Downloaded from Brill.Com10/07/2021 01:08:16PM Via Free Access 120 - R.H.B
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Contributions to Zoology, 72 (2-3) 119-130 (2003) SPB Academic Publishing bv, The Hague Evolution of reef-associated decapod crustaceans through time, with particular reference to the Maastrichtian type area René+H.B. Fraaije Oertijdmuseum de Groene Poort, Bosscheweg 80, NL-5283 WB Boxtel, the Netherlands Keywords: Decapod crustacean evolution, K/T boundary, biostratigraphy Abstract prior to 1987 by various authors (Bosquet, 1854; van Binkhorst, 1857; Binkhorst van den Binkhorst, The result of of some twenty years intensive collecting from 1861; Noetling, 1881; Pelseneer, 1886;Forir, 1887a- in the strata Maastrichtian type area is a collection ofmore than c, 1889; Mulder, 1981) suffer from a lack of strati- 1,200 generally small-sized anomuranand brachyuran remains. graphic control. A taxonomic revision of most of The of the stratigraphical ranges thirty-one species known to these was carried out Collins al. date species by et (1995). from the Maastricht Formation (Late Maastrichtian) are shown Since 1987, new from the Maastrichtian and five successive decapod assemblages are discussed. species For the first time, crustacean to decapod remains now turn out type area were described and discussed by Fraaye be useful biostratigraphic tools on a local to regional scale. & Collins (1987), Feldmann et al. (1990), Jagt et al. (1991, 1993), Collins et al. (1995), Fraaye (1996 a-c, 2002), Fraaye & van Bakel (1998) and Jagt et Introduction al. (2000). Rigid collecting from six key sections (see Collins Brachyurans utilize a broad of feeding types, array et al. 1995, p. 168, fig. 1) during the past two de- including deposit feeding, filter feeding, seaweed cades has resulted in an extensive, stratigraphically grazing, and have been scavenging predation. They well-documented, decapod, crustacean collection a major of many marine communities component containing over 1,200 specimens and housed at the from the Late Jurassic onwards and have probably Oertijdmuseum de .GroenePoort, Boxtel (the Neth- played an role in the evolution of important ma- erlands). rine ecosystems. Unfortunately, they are only rarely described by paleontologists and are also frequently overlooked by biologists in Recent marine com- Carapace size and morphology through time munities, especially in the tropics where crabs reach their & 1978). highest diversity (Zipser Vermeij, Crab size is be related thought to to predation pres- Apart from paleoecological factors and possible sure (Vermeij, 1978). The relatively small size of destruction after death, their in apparent scarcity the of crabs majority Mesozoic was probably con- paleontological collections is often due probably trolled by predation pressure of simultaneously to their small sizes, and therefore the relatively reef teleost fish evolving (Vermeij, 1978) and co- chance of being overlooked in the field (Bishop, occurring cephalopods. Apart from size selection, •986; Plotnick et The size of al., 1990). average predation pressure can also lead to avoidance strat- anomuran and brachyuran crab remains in the fine- egies, i.e., strategies devised to minimize the risks grained sediments of the Maastrichtian area type of For envis- being predated upon. crabs, we may 18 frss than 10 mm. Almost all decapod crustacean age four strategies that play a continuous role dur- species from the Maastricht Formation described ing theirevolution: 1 - to hide and live in crevices; Downloaded from Brill.com10/07/2021 01:08:16PM via free access 120 - R.H.B. Fraaije Evolution ofreef decapods through time - 2 3 - burrow into loose camouflage their carapace; during which a slower and stabilized evolutionary 4 - swim in sediments; open waters. pattern dominated.This model with pulses of rapid in the first is Carapace morphology group gen- diversification, mixing and more stable periods, in somewhat erally quadratic or elongate. Such crabs roughly 30 million year cycles, perfectly matches have been successful from the Late Jurassic the on- polyphyletic origin of such groups as the swim- wards and have retained crabs. After each consistently a relatively ming period, however, more and small size. The vast area of shelf seas with an ex- more ecological niches were successfully filled, of redundant bioherms after the Callovian the pansion leading to recent, most diverse (in size, mor- transgression offered various new ecological niches phology and feeding strategy) decapod crustacean and led to the diversification of rapid prosopids fauna ever seen on earth. (Forster, 1985). The other three strategies, which probably evolved during the Cretaceous, are char- acterized by a considerable size increase through Cretaceous/Ccnozoic decapod crustacean time. The strongly elongate and burrowing Raninidae evolution (frog crabs) are examples of the third group. They in appear the Early Cretaceous and show an in- The Late Cretaceous diversification of crabs coin- in size crease and diversity through time, with max- cides with two similar radiations in other preda- ima the Late Cretaceous (Feldmann et al., teleost and during tory groups, fish gastropods (Taylor, and Eocene (Forster & Mundlos, 1982). The These 1996) 1981). groups also seem to have thrived during Raninidae lived in shallow-water predominantly periods of transgression with maximum (semi-iso- environments the Mesozoic but during today are, lated) shallow-water habitats. The rapid evolution due to the Ceno- probably strong competition during of these predatory groups and others probably had zoic, effects mainly deep-water organisms. profound upon the structure of all benthic The of the ancestors Recent swimming crabs communities, and thus also affected crab evolution. that are wider than long and with To the possess carapaces put evolutionary patterns of decapod crus- in antero-lateral spines. They appeared the latest in the Maastrichtian in taceans type some perspec- Cretaceous the the (Fraaye, 1996a). During Eocene, tive, faunal data for five other well-studied regions crabs their largest swimming quadrupled carapace and ages are summarized in Fig. 1. As the majority size in their Maastrichtian comparison to probable of the type Maastrichtian decapods is linked with It is not mere coincidence that ancestors. periods reef-associated carbonates all decapod crustacean of increase in size and of diversity crabs are linked faunas compared are from similar environments. with sea level stands et all global high (Haq ah, 1987). Further, faunas represent the most diverse of radiations crabs Major explosive adaptive their as known. Studies among age presently used are Bishop occurred the Late the during Jurassic, Albian-Ceno- (1983, 1986: Lower Albian, Texas), Muller& Col- the manian, Campanian-Maastrichtian, and during lins (1991: Upper Eocene, Flungary), Muller (1984: the Eocene and Miocene These transgressions. pe- Middle Miocene, Hungary and Austria), Guinot riods are characterized stands by high leading to (1985: Recent, French Polynesia) and personal ob- many shallow, more or less isolated, seas. Conse- servations (Lower Kimmeridgian, southern Ger- crabs quently, more ecospace and new niches for many). came into existence. In isolated diver- seas, rapid Brachyuran crab diversity increased in time (Fig. sification of clades was probably very common. 1), implying a strong evolutionary radiation from The clades this of monophyletic produced by type the Late Jurassic onwards. It is also clear that cer- have event recently been referred to as tain ‘species brachyuran groups played a more prominent flocks’ (Yacobucci, 1996). After sea level fall, newly role in the shallow marine ecosystems than they evolved crab forced populations were to retreat and do currently. For instance, the Dynomenidae and mixing led to in turn strong competition, possibly Raninidae first appeared during the Late Jurassic leading to extinction and faunal turnovers (Fraaye, and Early Cretaceous, respectively. After a rapid 1996b). This was followed of by periods stasis, evolutionary radiation during the Late Cretaceous, Downloaded from Brill.com10/07/2021 01:08:16PM via free access Contributions to Zoology, 72 (2-3) - 2003 121 Fig. I. Reef-associated decapod crustacean faunas through time. Downloaded from Brill.com10/07/2021 01:08:16PM via free access 122 R.H.B. Fraaije - Evolution ofreef decapods through time 2. crustacean from Fig. Stratigraphic ranges of decapod genera Maastrichtian type area. they dramatically declined from the Eocene onwards. cessful group, however, is that of the Xanthidae. hold forthe their The same may true Calappidae, although Having originated during the Early Cretaceous, to a somewhat lesser extent. The decline of the evolutionary adaptations resulted in the by far most Raninidae possibly corresponds to the synchronous diverse group of brachyurans in reef-associated biotic radiation of clypeasteroid echinoids and sub- faunas. niche and the sequent competition and replacement. Decapod crustaceans are, probably were, Other such the food for groups, as Portunidae, Cancridae, most important source cephalopods (Fraaye Majidae, Leucosiidae, Parthenopidae and Grapsidae, & Jager, 1996; Jager & Fraaye, 1997). The preda- tion however, display a rapid evolutionary radiation in pressure on crabs by relatively fast swimming post-Eocene times, as do the Ocypodidae and Pilum- and hunting ammonites such as Placenticeras and in nidae from the Miocene onwards. The most suc- Sphenodiscus the Campanian and Maastrichtian Downloaded from Brill.com10/07/2021 01:08:16PM via free access Contributions to Zoology,