DOCSLIB.ORG

Governance for Youth, Trust and Intergenerational Justice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Governance for Youth, Trust and Intergenerational Justice OECD Public Governance Reviews Governance Public OECD OECD Public Governance Reviews Governance for Youth, Trust and Intergenerational Justice FIT FOR ALL GENERATIONS? Governance for Governance Youth, Trust and Trust Youth, Intergenerational Justice Justice Intergenerational FIT FOR ALL GENERATIONS? OECD Public Governance Reviews Governance for Youth, Trust and Intergenerational Justice FIT FOR ALL GENERATIONS? This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law. Note by Turkey The information in this document with reference to “Cyprus” relates to the southern part of the Island. There is no single authority representing both Turkish and Greek Cypriot people on the Island. Turkey recognises the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Until a lasting and equitable solution is found within the context of the United Nations, Turkey shall preserve its position concerning the “Cyprus issue”. Note by all the European Union Member States of the OECD and the European Union The Republic of Cyprus is recognised by all members of the United Nations with the exception of Turkey. The information in this document relates to the area under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus. Please cite this publication as: OECD (2020), Governance for Youth, Trust and Intergenerational Justice: Fit for All Generations?, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/c3e5cb8a-en. ISBN 978-92-64-42754-9 (print) ISBN 978-92-64-84700-2 (pdf) OECD Public Governance Reviews ISSN 2219-0406 (print) ISSN 2219-0414 (online) Photo credits: Cover © Roman Samborskyi/Shutterstock.com; Kang Sunghee/Shutterstock.com; George Rudy/Shutterstock.com. Corrigenda to publications may be found on line at: www.oecd.org/about/publishing/corrigenda.htm. © OECD 2020 The use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at http://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions. 3 Preface The COVID-19 pandemic has deeply disrupted our societies and economies. This disruption has also been strongly felt by our young people. Young people may be less at-risk in terms of developing severe physical health symptoms linked to COVID-19, but the medium- and long-term consequences of the crisis hit our young generation particularly hard. Having to navigate the economic and social fallout from the crisis, reduced employment and career prospects, and the risk of exclusion and poverty right at the outset of one’s life, is not easy. While future prospects remain uncertain, young people have displayed great resilience. They have shown true commitment to solidarity, and have not only withstood the challenges of this crisis, but helped in many ways. The myriad projects supported under European programmes such as Erasmus+ or the European Solidarity Corps are living proof of this commitment, as are all the young people that are active in national volunteer services or youth organisations. Our younger generations have shown that they are deeply engaged in bringing relief to those that need it most. Yet, illustrative examples are not enough to craft the policies we need. For that, we need hard evidence and systematic analysis. The OECD report on Governance for Youth, Trust and Intergenerational Justice: Fit for all Generations? provides valuable insight into the experience of young people today – the challenges they face as well as what they need to thrive. Its broad evidence-base allows us to identify many good practices, but it also reveals that much remains to be done to empower our young. These practices teach us that we need to double down on our investment in social cohesion and solidarity. The evidence that backs them demonstrates that public governance is crucial in supporting young people’s transition towards independent life. We need young people to be engaged and represented if public institutions are to retain their legitimacy and have a significant impact. It calls for integrated governance to support our youth’s transition to an autonomous life, acknowledging that gains in educational attainment, technological advancements and health outcomes have not always translated into more opportunities for young people. Crucially, the report raises the issue of young citizens’ trust in government, their participation and representation. It illustrates how young people get involved both in institutionalised and non-institutionalised channels of political participation, prompting questions about legal frameworks, governance tools and capacities. The report also raises questions related to resources and inter-generational solidarity. Given that OECD nations enjoy increasingly good life conditions and their inhabitants tend to live longer, the relative weight of older generations will increase, and so will their demand for resources. There is a need, therefore, to explore the magnitude of existing inequalities across generations, and to look for solutions. This knowledge should reinforce our commitment to address the considerable challenges faced by many young people as part of our recovery plans. By joining forces in the analysis of the current problems, the Member States, the European Union, and the OECD reinforce our collective capacity to provide appropriate policy responses. The report clearly highlights the added value that a coherent, cross-sectoral and participatory youth strategy can provide in order to fulfil this task. It also shows, how new governance GOVERNANCE FOR YOUTH, TRUST AND INTERGENERATIONAL JUSTICE © OECD 2020 4 tools such as impact assessments can help to integrate the concerns of young people more systematically in policy-making and intergenerational dialogue. Investing in younger generations remains at the core of our action. We must work towards creating new opportunities – not just for them, but with them. As European Commissioner and Minister, we also deem it important to focus equally on the three core areas of the EU Youth Strategy Engage – Connect – Empower and to contribute continuously to each of them. Therefore, we are working to reinforce European Union programmes such as Erasmus+ and the European Solidarity Corps, so that they will be more widely accessible and inclusive. Through thousands of projects every year, these programmes enable young people to shape their own channels for civic participation and community-building. We need to actively listen to our young people because there can be no justice without everyone’s voice being heard. Genuine dialogue between young people and decision makers and the achievement of the EU Youth Goals are our main objectives in taking the young people in Europe seriously. The OECD’s work on youth empowerment and intergenerational justice will help us support and sustain this endeavour. We must consider the well-being of both living and future generations, integrating intergenerational considerations more systematically in strategy design and programming, building up strategic foresight capacity to integrate a longer-term perspective in policy making, encouraging dialogue, and increasing transparency and accountability about our policy choices. Best regards, Dr. Franziska Giffey, Commissioner Mariya Gabriel, Federal Minister, Innovation, Research, Culture, Education and Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth Youth (BMFSFJ) GOVERNANCE FOR YOUTH, TRUST AND INTERGENERATIONAL JUSTICE © OECD 2020 5 Foreword In the context of global challenges and the adverse impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on today’s young and future generations, this report provides the first comparative assessment of the policies, laws, institutional capacities and governance tools put in place by 34 OECD countries, the European Union and eight non-member countries to promote youth empowerment and intergenerational justice. It draws on the responses collected from the OECD Youth Governance Surveys by government entities in charge of youth affairs, ministries of education and selected line ministries as well as 81 OECD-based youth organisations between May 2019 and February 2020. Where relevant, it integrates insights from the OECD Policy Response (2020) Youth and COVID-19: Response, Recovery and Resilience“. This report helps policy makers deliver policies and services that leave no generation behind. It does so by providing comparative evidence, benchmarks, good practices and lessons learned in three core areas: Supporting youth’s transition to an autonomous life Enhancing youth participation and representation in public life as well as trust in government, and Delivering fair policy outcomes for all generations This report is part of the work of the OECD Public Governance Committee (PGC) to promote citizen- centred policy design to ensure inclusive growth. This work is directed by the PGC and benefits from the discussions by the Friends of Youth PLUS group, which brings together PGC delegates, youth policy makers and representatives from youth and elderly organisations. The report draws on the evidence gathered by the Public Governance Committee, the Regulatory Policy Committee,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Framing Through Names and Titles in German
    Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2020), pages 4924–4932 Marseille, 11–16 May 2020 c European Language Resources Association (ELRA), licensed under CC-BY-NC Doctor Who? Framing Through Names and Titles in German Esther van den Berg∗z, Katharina Korfhagey, Josef Ruppenhofer∗z, Michael Wiegand∗ and Katja Markert∗y ∗Leibniz ScienceCampus, Heidelberg/Mannheim, Germany yInstitute of Computational Linguistics, Heidelberg University, Germany zInstitute for German Language, Mannheim, Germany fvdberg|korfhage|[email protected] fruppenhofer|[email protected] Abstract Entity framing is the selection of aspects of an entity to promote a particular viewpoint towards that entity. We investigate entity framing of political figures through the use of names and titles in German online discourse, enhancing current research in entity framing through titling and naming that concentrates on English only. We collect tweets that mention prominent German politicians and annotate them for stance. We find that the formality of naming in these tweets correlates positively with their stance. This confirms sociolinguistic observations that naming and titling can have a status-indicating function and suggests that this function is dominant in German tweets mentioning political figures. We also find that this status-indicating function is much weaker in tweets from users that are politically left-leaning than in tweets by right-leaning users. This is in line with observations from moral psychology that left-leaning and right-leaning users assign different importance to maintaining social hierarchies. Keywords: framing, naming, Twitter, German, stance, sentiment, social media 1. Introduction An interesting language to contrast with English in terms of naming and titling is German.
    [Show full text]
  • Plenarprotokoll 19/85
    Plenarprotokoll 19/85 Deutscher Bundestag Stenografischer Bericht 85. Sitzung Berlin, Mittwoch, den 13. März 2019 Inhalt: Tagesordnungspunkt 1: Dr. Franziska Giffey, Bundesministerin BMFSFJ ........................... 9977 B Befragung der Bundesregierung Dr. Franziska Giffey, Bundesministerin Norbert Müller (Potsdam) (DIE LINKE) .... 9977 C BMFSFJ ........................... 9973 C Dr. Franziska Giffey, Bundesministerin Johannes Huber (AfD) .................. 9974 B BMFSFJ ........................... 9977 D Dr. Franziska Giffey, Bundesministerin Paul Lehrieder (CDU/CSU) .............. 9978 A BMFSFJ ........................... 9974 B Dr. Franziska Giffey, Bundesministerin Johannes Huber (AfD) .................. 9974 C BMFSFJ ........................... 9978 B Dr. Franziska Giffey, Bundesministerin Stefan Schwartze (SPD) ................. 9978 C BMFSFJ ........................... 9974 D Dr. Franziska Giffey, Bundesministerin Dr. Silke Launert (CDU/CSU) ............ 9974 D BMFSFJ ........................... 9978 D Dr. Franziska Giffey, Bundesministerin Stefan Schwartze (SPD) ................. 9979 A BMFSFJ ........................... 9975 A Dr. Franziska Giffey, Bundesministerin Katja Suding (FDP). 9975 B BMFSFJ ........................... 9979 A Dr. Franziska Giffey, Bundesministerin Leni Breymaier (SPD) .................. 9979 B BMFSFJ ........................... 9975 B Dr. Franziska Giffey, Bundesministerin Katja Suding (FDP). 9975 C BMFSFJ ........................... 9979 C Dr. Franziska Giffey, Bundesministerin Sabine Zimmermann (Zwickau)
    [Show full text]
  • Pressebriefing
    Pressebriefing Nach dem Erfolg des Debattencamps 2018 veranstaltet die SPD am 12. Dezember 2020 das erste und größte digitale Debattencamp in ihrer Geschichte. In über 30 Sessions mit über 70 Speaker*innen diskutieren wir unsere Ideen für die Zukunft des Landes. Und wir laden Sie herzlich zur Berichterstattung ein: SPD DEBATTENCAMP #SPDDC20 am 12. Dezember 2020 ab 10 Uhr, online www.debattencamp.spd.de Das Debattencamp ist der Höhepunkt auf dem Weg zum SPD-Regierungsprogramm – ein Programm für unseren Kanzlerkandidaten Olaf Scholz. Alle 420.000 SPD-Mitglieder und Interessierte sind eingeladen, sich mit der Parteispitze sowie mit Expert*innen aus Wissenschaft, Wirtschaft, Medien und Gewerkschaften über die spannendsten Vorschläge aus dem Programmprozess auszutauschen. Die Zeit, die vor uns liegt, verlangt neue Antworten. Und die besten Ideen entwickeln wir gemeinsam. Unsere Zukunft wird dadurch bestimmt, wie wir Ideen fördern und gemeinsam dafür kämpfen. Wie wir Respekt innerhalb der Gesellschaft verankern und wie wir uns als mitgliederstärkste Partei Deutschlands Respekt dafür verdienen, wie wir das Land in die Zukunft führen. Wie schaffen wir ein neues Wir-Gefühl und sorgen damit für mehr Respekt in der Gesellschaft? Welche Veränderungen sind für eine moderne, erfolgreiche Wirtschaft notwendig, die Umwelt und Klima schont? Wie machen wir unseren Sozialstaat für die Zukunft fit? Und wie stärken wir Frieden und Europa? Wir wollen unser Land stark machen, für die Zeit, die vor uns liegt. Gemeinsam mit den Teilnehmer*innen besprechen wir die sechs großen Themenbereiche für das Regierungsprogramm 2021: Daseinsvorsorge und lebenswerter Alltag Nachhaltiges Wirtschaften und gute Arbeit Gutes Aufwachsen für Kinder und Jugendliche Digitaler und gesellschaftlicher Fortschritt Sicherheit und Freiheit Wir in der Welt Wir übertragen auf debattencamp.spd.de sieben Stunden lang live aus dem Willy-Brandt- Haus – direkt auf die Computer, Tablets und Smartphones aller Interessierter.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and Men in Germany
    Women and Men in Germany Women and Men in Germany 4 Opening remarks Dear Reader, Our guiding principle in gender equality policy is that women can do anything – a straightforward statement of fact. After all, we have achieved a lot in terms of gender equality in Germany. In recent years, the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth (BMFSFJ) invested extensively in good childcare and greater reconciliation of family and work, set up the Violence against Women hotline for women affected by violence, established legal transparency meas- ures regarding remuneration, and, with the help of the binding quota, increased the proportion of women on supervisory boards. For the first time in its history, the Federal Government has adopted a gender equality strategy to which all ministries are committed. We can be proud of all these important steps. But there is still a lot to do. Ultimately, the statement “women can do anything” is also a call to action. The COVID-19 pandemic has illustrated even more clearly the areas we need to tackle: women are bearing the brunt of the crisis not only in caring professions, but also by taking on unpaid care work. The pay gap between women and men remains consistently high at 20 per cent. And one in three women in Germany experiences physical or sexualised violence in her life. This brochure shows you where we stand in terms of gender equality in Ger many. You will learn about what specific measures we are taking to com- bat existing inequalities from the expansion of day care facilities to the Stronger than Violence (Stärker als Gewalt) initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany 2020 International Religious Freedom Report
    GERMANY 2020 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary The constitution prohibits religious discrimination and provides for freedom of faith and conscience and the practice of one’s religion. The country’s 16 states exercise considerable autonomy on registration of religious groups and other matters. Unrecognized religious groups are ineligible for tax benefits. Federal and some state offices of the domestic intelligence service continued to monitor the activities of certain Muslim groups and mosques. Authorities also monitored the Church of Scientology (COS), which reported continued government discrimination against its members. Certain states continued to ban or restrict the use of religious clothing or symbols, including headscarves, for some state employees. Senior government leaders continued to condemn anti-Semitism and anti-Muslim sentiment and acts. In September, Chancellor Angela Merkel described anti-Semitism as an attack on the dignity of individuals that “must be fought decisively” – ideally with education, but with the full strength of the criminal law system when necessary. Government officials responded to revelations of right-wing, anti-Semitic chat groups within police and the military by demanding investigations and dismissing those involved. Two additional state governments appointed anti-Semitism commissioners for the first time, bringing the total number of states with such commissioners to 15 (out of 16), in addition to the federal Jewish life and anti-Semitism commissioner. In October, the government announced it would increase social welfare funding for Holocaust survivors by 30.5 million euros ($37.4 million) in 2021 and provide an additional 564 million euros ($692 million) over the next two years to help Holocaust survivors cope with the burdens of the COVID-19 pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • PES Ministerial Declaration: Workers
    PES ministerial declaration: Workers’ participation, a key success factor for Europe’s recovery Adopted at the online PES meeting of Employment and Social Affairs Ministers, 13 October 2020 Fair and adequate wages, social protection, as well as stable and reliable contracts ensure the autonomy of workers the protection of their rights and contributes to their wellbeing and productivity. This autonomy and this protection enable workers of all genders to decide freely, build their future and shape their professional careers and life. This is why, as European socialists, we fight for quality jobs for all in Europe. For us, trade union membership, workers representation and participation, effective social dialogue and collective bargaining are the best ways and first choices to guarantee the protection of workers and ensure good working conditions, adequate wages and wage growth. Providing workers with the right to participate in company decision-making is a cornerstone of Social Europe. It is the trade unions’ fight and it is our fight. Covid-19 has severely hit the EU and its economies. Many companies have started restructuring processes, yet they will need a committed, innovative and creative workforce to get out of the crisis. Workers invest their time, motivation, skills and expertise for the development of a company and cannot be treated as a commodity. To the contrary, their involvement in corporate governance will help companies survive and further progress as we slowly recover from the sanitary crisis. The more extensive the involvement the higher the identification of workers and their active participation and contribution in challenging processes. Information, consultation and board-level representation of workers are part of the European social model and the social market economy, acknowledged in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Pillar of Social Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Wer Sitzt Wo? Politik, Verbände, Medien BUNDESRAT
    Köpfe der Gesundheitspolitik 2018 Wer sitzt wo? Politik, Verbände, Medien BUNDESRAT 2 INHALT BUNDESREGIERUNG 4 • Bundeskanzleramt 4 • Bundesministerium für Gesundheit 4 • Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales 4 • Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend 5 • Beauftragter der Bundesregierung für die Belange behinderter Menschen 5 • Beauftragter der Bundesregierung für die Belange der Patientinnen und Patienten 5 • Bevollmächtigter der Bundesregierung Alles auf Anfang für Pflege 5 Die Bundestagswahl 2017 war in mancher Hinsicht eine be- • Beauftragte der Bundesregierung sondere Wahl. Ganze 117 Tage, so lange wie nie zuvor, hat es für Drogenfragen 5 bis zur Regierungsbildung gedauert. 709 Abgeordnete, so viele wie nie zuvor, gehören dem 19. Deutschen Bundestag an. Die • Bundeswahlbeauftragte für die Zahl der Fraktionen ist von vier auf sechs gestiegen. Auch in Sozialversicherungswahlen 5 der Gesundheitspolitik gab es einen umfangreichen Personal- wechsel: Das Gesundheitsministerium wurde neu aufgestellt, BUNDESTAG 6der Ausschuss für Gesundheit ist größer geworden. Und bei Verbänden, Behörden und Medien hat sich im Laufe der letz- • CDU 6 ten Jahre ebenfalls einiges geändert. Damit stellt sich wohl • CSU 7 dringlicher denn je die Frage: „Wer sitzt wo?“ • SPD 7 Damit Sie auch in dieser Legislaturperiode schnell wissen, • AfD 8 welche Abgeordneten sich um das Thema Gesundheit küm- • FDP 8 mern und welche Journalisten darüber berichten, haben wir unsere Orientierungshilfe auf den neuesten Stand gebracht. • Die Linke. 9 Auch die nunmehr sechste Ausgabe soll Ihnen als Wegweiser • Bündnis 90/Die Grünen 9 durch die Berliner Gesundheitspolitik dienen, Ihnen das Kon- taktmanagement im Gesundheitswesen erleichtern und Sie • Ausschuss für Gesundheit 10 bei der Suche nach der richtigen Ansprechpartnerin und dem • Ausschuss für Arbeit und Soziales 17 richtigen Ansprechpartner unterstützen.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Equality and the Istanbul Convention: a Decade of Action PREMS 053021
    Gender equality and the Istanbul Convention: a decade of action PREMS 053021 ENG Conference organised by the Council PROGRAMME of Europe in partnership with the Online German Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Berlin, Germany Youth in the framework of the German 11 May 2021 Presidency of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe Tuesday 11 May 2021 10:00 – 10:35 am Opening Session Conference moderator: Astrid Frohloff High-level opening: The Istanbul Convention today and its achievements ► Franziska Giffey, Federal Minister for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth, Germany ► Marija Pejčinović Burić, Secretary General of the Council of Europe ► Rik Daems, President of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe ► Mariana Vieira da Silva, Minister of State of the Presidency, Portugal ► Marceline Naudi, President, Council of Europe Group of Experts on Action against Violence against Women and Domestic Violence ► Marcella Pirrone, President, Women Against Violence Europe 10:35 – 10:40 am Projection of video “Stronger than violence” by Eko Fresh, Rapper 10:40 – 10:55 am Coffee break 10:55 – 11:20 am The Istanbul Convention: the gamechanger for women and girls Conference moderator: Astrid Frohloff ► Feride Acar, first President of the Council of Europe Group of Experts on Action against Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Presentation of the four Ps (Pillars) of the Istanbul Convention in video format: Prevention, Protection, Prosecution, Co-ordinated Policies 11:20 – 12:30
    [Show full text]
  • Drucksache 19/28056 19
    Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 19/28056 19. Wahlperiode 29.03.2021 Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten Stephan Brandner, Detlev Spangenberg, Dr. Robby Schlund, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion der AfD – Drucksache 19/27510 – Teilnehmer der Bund-Länder-Konferenzen zur Corona-Pandemie Vorbemerkung der Fragesteller Der Ausarbeitung der Wissenschaftlichen Dienste (WD) des Deutschen Bun- destages mit dem Titel „Bund-Länder-Konferenzen zur Corona-Pandemie“ (WD 3 – 3000 – 031/21 vom 8. Februar 2021) ist zu entnehmen, dass die Bund-Länder-Konferenzen zur Corona-Pandemie an den folgenden Terminen stattgefunden haben: 12. März 2020, 16. März 2020, 22. März 2020, 1. April 2020, 15. April 2020, 30. April 2020, 6. Mai 2020, 17. Juni 2020, 16. Juli 2020, 27. August 2020, 29. September 2020, 7. Oktober 2020, 14. Oktober 2020, 28. Oktober 2020, 16. November 2020, 25. November 2020, 2. Dezem- ber 2020, 13. Dezember 2020, 5. Januar 2021, 19. Januar 2021, 1. Februar 2021 und 10. Februar 2021. Demgegenüber ist nach Ansicht der Fragesteller unbekannt, welche Personen neben den Ministerpräsidenten und der Bundes- kanzlerin Dr. Angela Merkel zu dem Teilnehmerkreis gehörten, was unter an- derem mit dieser Anfrage geklärt werden soll. Innerhalb der 208. Sitzung des Deutschen Bundestages wurde allerdings bekannt, dass der Bundesminister der Finanzen Olaf Scholz ebenfalls an der Konferenz teilnimmt (Plenarproto- koll 19/208, S. 26240). Er wurde auf Antrag der Fraktion BÜNDNIS 90/ DIE GRÜNEN mit Unterstützung der Fraktionen der
    [Show full text]
  • 6.8 Regierungsmitglieder Ohne Bundestagsmandat 20.05.2021
    DHB Kapitel 6.8 Regierungsmitglieder ohne Bundestagsmandat 20.05.2021 6.8 Regierungsmitglieder ohne Bundestagsmandat Stand: 20.5.2021 In der Regel sind die Mitglieder der Bundesregierung zugleich auch Mitglieder des Deutschen Bundestages. Es gibt jedoch weder eine Bestimmung, die dieses vorschreibt, noch eine, die dieses einschränkt oder generell ausschließt (vgl. Kapitel 2.8: Inkompatibilitäten). In den bisherigen Fällen, in denen Mitglieder der Bundesregierung nicht gleichzeitig Bundestagsmitglieder waren, wird zwischen „typischen“ und „situationsbedingten“ Nichtmitgliedschaften im Bundestag unterschieden (Adalbert Hess)1. Typische Nichtmitgliedschaften finden sich z.B. bei Experten und ranghohen Beamten, die in ein Ministeramt gerufen werden, situationsbedingte Nichtmitgliedschaften oft bei Politikern, die kurzfristig wegen überraschender Minister- oder Regierungswechsel in das Bundeskabinett eintreten. Nicht selten werden letztere in der nachfolgenden Wahlperiode Mitglied des Bundestages. In der 1. bis 11. Wahlperiode waren 23 Regierungsmitglieder (einschließlich Bundeskanzler) ohne Bundestagsmandat. Die Namen der Regierungsmitglieder ohne Bundestagsmandat seit der 12. Wahlperiode sind in der folgenden tabellarischen Übersicht zusammengestellt. lfd. Nr. Regierungs- Wahlperiode (seit mitglieder ohne Partei Ressort Bemerkungen 1949) Bundestagsmandat 12. WP 24 Klaus Kinkel FDP2 BM der Justiz; MdB: 13.–14. WP 1990–1994 ab 18.5.1992: BM des Auswärtigen 25 Günter Rexrodt FDP BM für Wirtschaft MdB: 13.–14. WP, (ab 21.1.1993) 15. WP bis † 19.8.2004 26 Manfred Kanther CDU BM des Inneren MdB: 13. WP, 14. WP (ab 7.7.1993) bis 25.1.2000 13. WP – – – – 1994–1998 14. WP 27 Bodo Hombach SPD BM für besondere Aufgaben BM bis 31.7.1999; 1998–2002 und Chef des Chef des Bundeskanzleramtes Bundeskanzleramtes bis 7.7.1999 28 Hans Eichel SPD BM der Finanzen MdB: 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Schutzbrief Gegen Weibliche Genitalverstümmelung
    Imprint THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT Female genital mutilation is a crime and a grave human rights violation with life-long, serious physical and mental consequences This letter of protection is part of the public relations work of the for the girls and women affected. The procedure of female genital Federal Government; it is made available free of charge and is not mutilation may also directly result in death due to high levels of intended for sale. blood loss or severe infection. Franziska Giffey Horst Seehofer Federal Minister for Family Affairs, Federal Minister of the Interior, Published on behalf of the Federal Government by: In Germany, performing female genital mutilation Senior Citizens, Women and Youth Building and Community Bundesministerium is a criminal offence that is punishable with impri- für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend sonment of up to 15 years. Referat Öffentlichkeitsarbeit 11018 Berlin Female genital mutilation is the partial or total removal of the www.bmfsfj.de external female genitalia; in its most severe form, the vaginal opening is sewn closed almost completely. If you have any questions, call our service telephone: 030 20 179 130 Monday–Thursday: 9 am – 6 pm Fax: +49 30 18 555-4400 What do I do with this letter? Heiko Maas Christine Lambrecht Email: [email protected] LETTER OF You can take this letter of protection with you and show it to your Federal Minister for Federal Minister of Justice family in your home country. The letter clarifies that performing Foreign Affairs and Consumer Protection Public service telephone number for all government agencies PROTECTION female genital mutilation is a criminal offence in Germany – even and offices: 115* if it is carried out abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • ENERGIETAGE 2021: Vier Bundesminister*Innen Und Zahlreiche Spitzenvertreter*Innen Aus Forschung Und Wirtschaft Aktiv Dabei
    Pressemitteilung, 12.04.2021 ENERGIETAGE 2021: Vier Bundesminister*innen und zahlreiche Spitzenvertreter*innen aus Forschung und Wirtschaft aktiv dabei 100 Foren | 300 Expert*innen | digitale Netzwerkformate | 21.-23. April und 28.-30. April www.energietage.de Am 21. April starten die ENERGIETAGE 2021. Erstmalig halten vier Bundesminister*innen Vorträge auf der Leitveranstaltung der Energiewende in Deutschland. Dies zeigt den hohen Stellenwert energie- und klimapolitischer Fragestellungen im Superwahljahr. Sowohl Bundesumweltministerin Svenja Schulze als auch Bundeswirtschaftsminister Peter Altmaier, Bundesfinanzminister Olaf Scholz sowie Bundesfamilienministerin Franziska Giffey haben ihre Mitwirkung an den ENERGIETAGEN 2021 zugesagt. Neben politischen Entscheidungsträgern gehen führende Wissenschaftler*innen, Spitzenvertreter*innen aus Wohnungs- und Immobilienwirtschaft sowie Top-Manager*innen der Energiebranche auf den ENERGIETAGEN 2021 in den Austausch mit den Teilnehmenden. Zu den Programm-Highlights zählen u.a. folgende Veranstaltungen: • Eröffnung der ENERGIETAGE 2021 mit Jürgen Pöschk, Initiator und Hauptveranstalter der ENERGIETAGE und Prof. Stefan Rahmstorf, Potsdam-Institut für Klimafolgenforschung e.V. • Corona im Klimaschutz: Bremse oder Katalysator? u.a. mit Bundesumweltministerin Svenja Schulze • Peter Altmaier im Gespräch: Energiewende in Deutschland – im Spannungsfeld zwischen Energieeffizienz und erneuerbaren Energien Vortrag und Diskussion zu Energieeffizienz im Spannungsfeld zwischen Anreizinstrumenten und Ordnungsrecht
    [Show full text]