INTRODUCTION Eric Langenbacher Liminal Germany

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

INTRODUCTION Eric Langenbacher Liminal Germany INTRODUCTION Merkeldämmerung Eric Langenbacher Government, Georgetown University Abstract: The elections for the German Bundestag on 24 September 2017 saw heavy losses for the two governing parties—the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and the Social Democratic Party (SPD)—and the rise of the right- populist Alternative for Germany (AfD). It took almost six months for a new grand coalition to be formed in light of the extremely fragmented parliament. Despite the good economic situation and relative calm domestically and inter- nationally, much change is occurring under the surface. Most importantly, the country is preparing for the end of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s long tenure. Who and what will come next? Can the surging AfD be contained? Will Ger- many step up into the leadership role for which so many have called? Keywords: 2017 Bundestag election, Alternative for Germany (AfD), Angela Merkel, Christian Democratic Union (CDU) German Parliament, political parties, Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) Liminal Germany I was recently re-watching the last Harry Potter film and was struck by the scene where Harry speaks with Dumbledore in a kind of purgatory, having to decide to die or go back to the living to try to defeat evil Lord Voldemort once and for all. (Spoiler alert: He chose the latter and was successful). This depiction of that space in-between life and death seems to be a fitting metaphor for German politics right now—seemingly immobile, in a weird kind of transitional stasis, a liminal state, with everything on hold, caught in-between one reality and another. On the surface, everything looks placid—there were even internet memes circulating about how there was no new government in Berlin for almost half a year, but no one noticed. Various international crises bubble up peri- odically, but nothing has been too dramatic. Syria? Brexit? Trump? The Alternative for Germany (AfD)? The economy chugs along nicely. Holidays German Politics and Society, Issue 126 Vol. 36, No. 1 (Spring 2018): 1–30 © Georgetown University and Berghahn Books doi:10.3167/gps.2018.360101 • ISSN 1045-0300 (Print) • ISSN 1558-5441 (Online) Eric Langenbacher in Mallorca, Rügen, and the Salzkammergut are as popular as ever. The politicians squabble, but Chancellor Angela Merkel will persist There is, however, much brewing underneath the surface. Expectations are rapidly mounting for the new grand coalition government—and not just for programs and policies domestically. Responses to the simmering chal- lenges that have been put on hold essentially for six to twelve months because of the campaign and the caretaker government will have to be dealt with soon. German policy makers will have to respond to French President Emmanuel Macron’s ambitious Eurozone and EU reform proposals includ- ing a joint Eurozone budget, a finance minister responsible to the European Parliament, and a joint military force.1 Despite calls from some quarters that the British elite or public will pull back from the 2016 decision, Brexit will likely happen during the current parliamentary term. Given the ambiguous status of negotiations and the likelihood of a transitional phase, it is unclear how much of a negative impact this will have on the German or European economy—but negative it will be at one point.2 Increasingly illiberal eastern European governments in places like Hungary and Poland need to be con- fronted. Migration and integration are still huge challenges. Presidents Vladimir Putin, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Donald Trump (despite much wishful thinking) are not going away any time soon. Trade restrictions (including tariffs announced by Trump in March 2018) and a transatlantic trade war are quite possible. The energy transition (Energiewende), wave of automation, and aging population are rapidly advancing realities. More existentially, many have observed that German power has been rising for years. Notable instances include imposing policy preferences dur- ing the Eurozone crisis and the migration crisis in 2015. Millions of people are waiting to see if Germany is going to take on a bigger leadership role abroad—whether it can or will help to fill the vacuum—of shrinking Ameri- can leadership. Nevertheless, the country has denied its newfound influence and has shrunk from more conventional power projection as with the 2011 decision not to support allied efforts to oust Gaddafi in Libya. It cannot even bring itself to commit 2 percent of GDP to defense spending—despite a budget surplus. It is the ever-reluctant hegemon. Yet, as much as Germans might not want to take up the mantle of leadership, the alternative—a power or leadership vacuum—could be much worse with proliferating bad actors filling the void and doing substantial damage to the interests of Germany and the liberal democratic community more broadly. Until now, Germany under Merkel has been able to delay a reckoning or a clear acknowledge- ment of the reality of its increased power, as well as the obligations that come with accepting such a role. It is a kind of luxury to take your time, ••• 2 ••• Introduction deciding not to decide. The luxury of Germany’s liminal moment is soon coming to an end. This long-repressed reckoning both domestically and internationally is now at hand. Merkel knows this, as revealed in her 2018 New Year’s address: “Because the world will not wait for us. We must act today to cre- ate the conditions for Germany to thrive ten and fifteen years from now.”3 Yet, Merkel—the greatest survivor in German politics—seems increasingly tired at the age of sixty-three, chancellor going on thirteen years, and Chris- tian Democratic Union (CDU) party leader for the better part of two decades. As intelligent and perceptive as she is, she surely senses her weak- ening position. She might last until the next scheduled elections in 2021, but probably not. The country has started to think seriously about who will come next and what kind of leader the country needs. Rivals are starting to circle the wagons and overtly conspire.4 Certainly, the Federal Republic has had many other moments of transi- tion with a fin de siècle feeling. The waning years of Chancellors Konrad Adenauer and Helmut Kohl come immediately to mind. Nevertheless, something feels different currently. At those previous moments, there was a clear, exciting (to many at least) alternative—leaders who articulated a new vision, or joint project—younger politicians like Willy Brandt and Gerhard Schröder with vigor and momentum. This time, however, there is nothing and no one like that on the horizon. The current crop of politicians preaches more of the same—only with a different face and perhaps better management at the margins. That, of course, is disregarding the Alternative for Germany—which has momentum, but with a pessimistic, dystopian, and retrograde vision. No one seems to want to step up and articulate a clear vision for the coun- try, continent, or world for which so many have been calling. It is indeed the twilight of Merkel (Merkeldämmerung), but what dawn (Morgenrot) is on the horizon? These are the issues surrounding the 2017 Bundestag election and its aftermath that this special issue of German Politics and Society confronts. The Campaign As expected, the campaign was short on drama, although it was perhaps not quite as boring as recent electoral cycles. There were two big develop- ments in the nine months before election day in September 2017. First was the saga of Martin Schulz and his Social Democratic Party (SPD). A promi- nent social democratic politician in the European Parliament—a MEP from ••• 3 ••• Eric Langenbacher 1994 to 2017 and parliamentary president from 2012 to 2017 (although also involved in the domestic party leadership), he was selected as SPD chancel- lor candidate in January 2017, and then replaced Sigmar Gabriel as party leader in March of that year. He seemed like an ideal choice—experienced but not sullied by a leadership role in the red-green or later grand coalition governments. Unlike any prominent minister or parliamentary leader, this would allow him to criticize the out-going government and differentiate the SPD from Merkel’s CDU. At first, Schulz had massive support within the party and the electorate. In fact, he was elected party chair with an unprece- dented 100 percent of the delegates and (re-elected with 82 percent in December 2017).5 Polling from February to April 2017, had the party at or above 30 percent—at one point even with or slightly ahead of the CDU.6 But, from May onwards the party began to slip in the polls. Its electoral program was full of classic social democratic themes, emphasizing justice (Gerechtigkeit) for all. Full employment, more jobs as part of union-negoti- ated wage agreements, expanded European governance, eliminating gender pay differences, and continuing a humane, but Europeanized migration pol- icy were all in there.7 Observers considered these campaign messages to be lackluster, although better than the vague 2013 slogan (“Das Wir entschei- det”—“the we decides” for readers who had forgotten). Common posters included “Time for more justice. Time for Martin Schulz” or a picture of a woman with the message “whoever works 100 percent, should not earn 21 percent less.”8 But, this emphasis on social justice and inequality did not resonate. The party tried to pivot towards a focus on migration and integration closer to election day, but this was too little too late. The many compromises that came with almost continuous governing for fifteen of the last nineteen years have taken a toll—as has competition from the other leftist and populist par- ties. Numerous SPD politicians expressed frustration that so many of their issues have become policy (e.g., minimum wage), but that Merkel typically got all the credit.
Recommended publications
  • Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM UVM Honors College Senior Theses Undergraduate Theses 2018 Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany William Peter Fitz University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses Recommended Citation Fitz, William Peter, "Reactionary Postmodernism? Neoliberalism, Multiculturalism, the Internet, and the Ideology of the New Far Right in Germany" (2018). UVM Honors College Senior Theses. 275. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/hcoltheses/275 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in UVM Honors College Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REACTIONARY POSTMODERNISM? NEOLIBERALISM, MULTICULTURALISM, THE INTERNET, AND THE IDEOLOGY OF THE NEW FAR RIGHT IN GERMANY A Thesis Presented by William Peter Fitz to The Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of Bachelor of Arts In European Studies with Honors December 2018 Defense Date: December 4th, 2018 Thesis Committee: Alan E. Steinweis, Ph.D., Advisor Susanna Schrafstetter, Ph.D., Chairperson Adriana Borra, M.A. Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter One: Neoliberalism and Xenophobia 17 Chapter Two: Multiculturalism and Cultural Identity 52 Chapter Three: The Philosophy of the New Right 84 Chapter Four: The Internet and Meme Warfare 116 Conclusion 149 Bibliography 166 1 “Perhaps one will view the rise of the Alternative for Germany in the foreseeable future as inevitable, as a portent for major changes, one that is as necessary as it was predictable.
    [Show full text]
  • Framing Through Names and Titles in German
    Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2020), pages 4924–4932 Marseille, 11–16 May 2020 c European Language Resources Association (ELRA), licensed under CC-BY-NC Doctor Who? Framing Through Names and Titles in German Esther van den Berg∗z, Katharina Korfhagey, Josef Ruppenhofer∗z, Michael Wiegand∗ and Katja Markert∗y ∗Leibniz ScienceCampus, Heidelberg/Mannheim, Germany yInstitute of Computational Linguistics, Heidelberg University, Germany zInstitute for German Language, Mannheim, Germany fvdberg|korfhage|[email protected] fruppenhofer|[email protected] Abstract Entity framing is the selection of aspects of an entity to promote a particular viewpoint towards that entity. We investigate entity framing of political figures through the use of names and titles in German online discourse, enhancing current research in entity framing through titling and naming that concentrates on English only. We collect tweets that mention prominent German politicians and annotate them for stance. We find that the formality of naming in these tweets correlates positively with their stance. This confirms sociolinguistic observations that naming and titling can have a status-indicating function and suggests that this function is dominant in German tweets mentioning political figures. We also find that this status-indicating function is much weaker in tweets from users that are politically left-leaning than in tweets by right-leaning users. This is in line with observations from moral psychology that left-leaning and right-leaning users assign different importance to maintaining social hierarchies. Keywords: framing, naming, Twitter, German, stance, sentiment, social media 1. Introduction An interesting language to contrast with English in terms of naming and titling is German.
    [Show full text]
  • Schnelle Hilfe Durch D2
    11 N /A- B i N ^ *c B R L N E R M O R G E N N G DER TAGESSPIEGEL COGNOSCERE Aus -1 rv\ * Berlin und / 1 ~n rvn f " / Ndl. 2,45 hfl / Frankr. 7,80 KP / Ital. 2925 L / Schweiz 2,45 str / . rr~~ « BERLIN, MONTAG, 17. OKTOBER 1994 / 50. Jahrgang / Nr. 15 064 1 UM Brandenburg / 1,31) 1JJV1 wärts / Ösrerr. 14 öS / Span. 200 Pias / Großbr. 140 p / Luxembg. 25 fr / AbOZZA BERLIN SPORT KULTUR Nichts ist unmöglich Das Bundesarchiy Michael Schumacher hat das Fragen an die deutsche VON GERD APPENZELLER zieht in die einstigen Formel-1 -Rennen in Jerez Geschichte - eine Ausstellung ie Wähler haben gestern, wenn Andrews-Barracks seiteio gewonnen seiteis zieht um SEHE 21 auch hauchdünn, die bisherige DRegierungskoalition bestätigt. Das Bedürfnis nach Sicherheit und Kontinui- tät wog schwerer als der Wunsch nach Veränderung, wenn auch bei weitem nicht in dem Ausmaß, wie es sich dei Kanzler gewünscht hätte. Dennoch: Hel- Hauchdünne Mehrheit für Kohl und Kinkel mut Kohl kann vermutlich im Amt blei- ben. Den Willen dazu hat er gestern Vorsprung schmolz im Lauf des Abends bis auf zwei Sitze / Gysi, Heym, Luft und Müller gewinnen PDS-Direktmandate in Berlin / FDP bei abend unmißverständlich bekundet. Sei- ne Feststellung, er verfüge über eine re- über sechs Prozent / Geringe Wahlbeteiligung / SPD in Berlin stärkste Partei / Liberale bei Landtagswahlen gescheitert / SPD im Saarland vorn gierungsfähige Mehrheit ist richtig, wenn der liberale Partner bei der Stange Tsp. BONN/BERLIN. Die Koalition von Union und FDP kann in Bonn voraussicht- bleibt. Diesem blieb die Verbannung aus lich mit der hauchdünnen Mehrheit von zwei Sitzen weiterregieren.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Age – the Implementers 1 July – 31 December 2020
    Digital Age – The Implementers 1 July – 31 December 2020 ”Digitalisation has a huge impact on the way we live, work and communicate. In some fields, Europe has to catch up – like for business to consumers – while in others we are frontrunners – such as in business to business. We have to make our single market fit for the digital age, we need Renew to make the most of artificial intelligence and big data, EPP S&D Europe we have to improve on cybersecurity and we have to work hard for our technological sovereignty.” — Ursula von der Leyen President of the European Commission Bjoern Seibert Ilze Juhansone Lorenzo Mannelli Klaus Welle François Roux Jeppe Tranholm-Mikkelsen Head of cabinet Secretary General Head of cabinet Secretary General Head of cabinet Secretary General Executive Vice-President Margrethe Vestager will coordinate the agenda on a Europe fit for the digital age. Ursula von der Leyen David Sassoli Charles Michel Renew S&D Europe COMP Margrethe Vestager Kim Jørgensen Oliver Guersent Irene Tinagli Claudia Lindemann EPP Commissioner Head of Cabinet Director General ECON Committee Chair ECON Secretariat Peter Altmaier Norbert Schultes Federal Minister of Economics Permanent Representation GROW and Energy Kerstin Jorna Greens/EFA Renew Director General Europe EPP Petra de Sutter Panos Konstantopoulos CONNECT IMCO Committee Chair IMCO Secretariat with ITRE with ITRE Thierry Breton Valère Moutarlier Roberto Viola Cristian- Peter Andreas Scheuer Stefanie Schröder Silviu Bușoi Traung Federal Minister of Transport Margrethe Commissioner
    [Show full text]
  • H.E. Ms. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany, Addresses 100Th International Labour Conference
    H.E. Ms. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany, Addresses 100th International Labour Conference In the first ever visit of a German Chancellor to the International Labour Organisation (ILO), H.E. Ms. Angela Merkel today addressed the Organization’s annual conference. Speaking to the historic 100th session of the International Labour Conference (ILC) Ms Merkel highlighted the increasing role played by the ILO in closer international cooperation. The G8 and G20 meetings would be “unthinkable without the wealth of experience of this Organisation”, she said, adding that the ILO’s involvement was the only way “to give globalization a form, a structure” (In German with subtitles in English). Transcription in English: Juan Somavia, Director-General, International Labour Organization: “Let me highlight your distinctive sense of policy coherence. Since 2007, you have regularly convened in Berlin the heads of the IMF, World Bank, WTO, OECD and the ILO, and urged us to strengthen our cooperation, and this with a view to building a strong social dimension of globalization and greater policy coherence among our mandates. These dialogues, under your guidance, have been followed up actively by the ILO with important joint initiatives with all of them, whose leaders have all addressed the Governing Body of the ILO. You have been a strong voice for a fairer, more balanced globalization in which much needs to be done by all international organizations.” Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany: “Universal and lasting peace can be established only if it is based on social justice.” This is the first sentence of the Constitution of the ILO and I also wish to start my speech with these words, as they clearly express what the ILO is all about and what it is trying to achieve: universal peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Detering | Was Heißt Hier »Wir«? [Was Bedeutet Das Alles?] Heinrich Detering Was Heißt Hier »Wir«? Zur Rhetorik Der Parlamentarischen Rechten
    Detering | Was heißt hier »wir«? [Was bedeutet das alles?] Heinrich Detering Was heißt hier »wir«? Zur Rhetorik der parlamentarischen Rechten Reclam Reclams UniveRsal-BiBliothek Nr. 19619 2019 Philipp Reclam jun. Verlag GmbH, Siemensstraße 32, 71254 Ditzingen Gestaltung: Cornelia Feyll, Friedrich Forssman Druck und Bindung: Kösel GmbH & Co. KG, Am Buchweg 1, 87452 Altusried-Krugzell Printed in Germany 2019 Reclam, UniveRsal-BiBliothek und Reclams UniveRsal-BiBliothek sind eingetragene Marken der Philipp Reclam jun. GmbH & Co. KG, Stuttgart ISBn 978-3-15-019619-9 Auch als E-Book erhältlich www.reclam.de Inhalt Reizwörter und Leseweisen 7 Wir oder die Barbarei 10 Das System der Zweideutigkeit 15 Unser Deutschland, unsere Vernichtung, unsere Rache 21 Ich und meine Gemeinschaft 30 Tausend Jahre, zwölf Jahre 34 Unsere Sprache, unsere Kultur 40 Anmerkungen 50 Nachbemerkung 53 Leseempfehlungen 58 Über den Autor 60 »Sie haben die unglaubwürdige Kühnheit, sich mit Deutschland zu verwechseln! Wo doch vielleicht der Augenblick nicht fern ist, da dem deutschen Volke das Letzte daran gelegen sein wird, nicht mit ihnen verwechselt zu werden.« Thomas Mann, Ein Briefwechsel (1936) Reizwörter und Leseweisen Die Hitlerzeit – ein »Vogelschiss«; die in Hamburg gebo- rene SPD-Politikerin Aydan Özoğuz – ein Fall, der »in Ana- tolien entsorgt« werden sollte; muslimische Flüchtlinge – »Kopftuchmädchen und Messermänner«: Formulierungen wie diese haben in den letzten Jahren und Monaten im- mer von neuem für öffentliche Empörung, für Gegenreden und Richtigstellungen
    [Show full text]
  • Deutscher Bundestag
    Deutscher Bundestag 44. Sitzung des Deutschen Bundestages am Freitag, 27.Juni 2014 Endgültiges Ergebnis der Namentlichen Abstimmung Nr. 4 Entschließungsantrag der Abgeordneten Caren Lay, Eva Bulling-Schröter, Dr. Dietmar Bartsch, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion DIE LINKE. zu der dritten Beratung des Gesetzentwurfs der Bundesregierung Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur grundlegenden Reform des Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetzes und zur Änderung weiterer Bestimmungen des Energiewirtschaftsrechts - Drucksachen 18/1304, 18/1573, 18/1891 und 18/1901 - Abgegebene Stimmen insgesamt: 575 Nicht abgegebene Stimmen: 56 Ja-Stimmen: 109 Nein-Stimmen: 465 Enthaltungen: 1 Ungültige: 0 Berlin, den 27.06.2014 Beginn: 10:58 Ende: 11:01 Seite: 1 Seite: 2 Seite: 2 CDU/CSU Name Ja Nein Enthaltung Ungült. Nicht abg. Stephan Albani X Katrin Albsteiger X Peter Altmaier X Artur Auernhammer X Dorothee Bär X Thomas Bareiß X Norbert Barthle X Julia Bartz X Günter Baumann X Maik Beermann X Manfred Behrens (Börde) X Veronika Bellmann X Sybille Benning X Dr. Andre Berghegger X Dr. Christoph Bergner X Ute Bertram X Peter Beyer X Steffen Bilger X Clemens Binninger X Peter Bleser X Dr. Maria Böhmer X Wolfgang Bosbach X Norbert Brackmann X Klaus Brähmig X Michael Brand X Dr. Reinhard Brandl X Helmut Brandt X Dr. Ralf Brauksiepe X Dr. Helge Braun X Heike Brehmer X Ralph Brinkhaus X Cajus Caesar X Gitta Connemann X Alexandra Dinges-Dierig X Alexander Dobrindt X Michael Donth X Thomas Dörflinger X Marie-Luise Dött X Hansjörg Durz X Jutta Eckenbach X Dr. Bernd Fabritius X Hermann Färber X Uwe Feiler X Dr. Thomas Feist X Enak Ferlemann X Ingrid Fischbach X Dirk Fischer (Hamburg) X Axel E.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Lindner Stellt Sich Den Fragen Der Gipfel-Teilnehmer
    05.–07.02.2019 SCHWÄBISCH HALL EXKLUSIV: Christian Lindner stellt sich den Fragen der Gipfel-Teilnehmer Christian Lindner MdB Bundesvorsitzender der Freien Demokraten Aktuelle Informationen unter: weltmarktfuehrer-gipfel.de Mitveranstalter Ideeller Partner Christian Lindner MdB war zum Politischen Power Talk beim Gipfeltreffen der Weltmarktführer 2019 fest eingeplant, musste aus dringenden Gründen aber leider kurzfristig absagen. Fragen an Herrn Lindner konnten die Teilnehmer in Schriftform trotzdem stellen, die er uns im Nachgang gerne beantwortet hat. Lesen Sie nun, was die überwiegend mittelständischen Vertreter vom Bundesvorsitzenden der Freien Demokraten wissen wollten – sowohl auf politischer als auch auf persönlicher Ebene. WAS WOLLTEN SIE CHRISTIAN LINDNER SCHON IMMER EINMAL FRAGEN? 1 Wie starten Sie in den Tag? 12 Wenn Sie heute noch mal gründen würden – was? Ich mache Sport und gucke dabei Netflix, dann Einen digitalisierten Handwerksbetrieb. Außerdem verschaffe ich mir einen Überblick über die Medienlage glaube ich, dass die Chancen der Biologisierung als und trinke einen Espresso. zweitem Trend neben der Digitalisierung unterschätzt werden. 2 Was tun Sie für Ihre Fitness? Ganz unterschiedlich – am liebsten Rudern! 13 Welche Politiker-Kollegen wären Ihre Mitgründer in einem Start-up? 3 Was wollten Sie als kleiner Junge werden? Das kommt darauf an, was der Fokus eines Unter- Ich bin auf dem Land groß geworden und wollte immer nehmens ist. In jedem Fall unseren Schatzmeister Bauer werden – Dinge selbst in die Hand nehmen und Hermann Otto Solms, denn einen, der auf die Finanzen dabei große Fahrzeuge fahren, ein echter Traum. achtet, braucht man immer. 4 Sie haben vor kurzem den Jagdschein gemacht. 14 Gucken Sie Videos Ihrer Auftritte? Konnten Sie bereits einen kapitalen Hirsch zur Strecke Nein.
    [Show full text]
  • To Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel C/O Minister of Finance Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble C/O Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel
    To Chancellor Dr. Angela Merkel c/o Minister of Finance Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble c/o Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel Dear Chancellor Merkel, We, the undersigned organisations from [XX] European countries are very grateful for your commitment to the financial transaction tax (FTT) in the framework of Enhanced Coopera- tion. Like you, we are of the opinion that only a broad based tax as specified in the coalition agreement and spelt out in the draft of the European Commission will be sufficiently compre- hensive. However, we are concerned that under the pressure of the finance industry some govern- ments will try to water down the proposal of the Commission. Particularly problematic would be to exempt derivatives from taxation or to tax only some of them. Derivatives represent the biggest share of transactions on the financial markets. Hence, exemptions would lead imme- diately to a substantial reduction of tax revenues. Furthermore, many derivatives are the source of dangerous stability risks and would be misused as instruments for the avoidance of the taxation of shares and bonds. We therefore ask you not to give in to the pressure of the finance industry and to tax deriva- tives as put forward in the draft proposal of the Commission. The primacy of politics over financial markets must be restored. In addition we would like to ask you to send a political signal with regard to the use of the tax revenues. We know that the German budget law does not allow the assignment of tax reve- nues for a specific purpose. However, you yourself have already stated that you could envis- age the revenues being used partly to combat youth unemployment in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Society
    B56133 The Science Magazine of the Max Planck Society 4.2018 Digital Society POLITICAL SCIENCE ASTRONOMY BIOMEDICINE LEARNING PSYCHOLOGY Democracy in The oddballs of A grain The nature of decline in Africa the solar system of brain children’s curiosity SCHLESWIG- Research Establishments HOLSTEIN Rostock Plön Greifswald MECKLENBURG- WESTERN POMERANIA Institute / research center Hamburg Sub-institute / external branch Other research establishments Associated research organizations Bremen BRANDENBURG LOWER SAXONY The Netherlands Nijmegen Berlin Italy Hanover Potsdam Rome Florence Magdeburg USA Münster SAXONY-ANHALT Jupiter, Florida NORTH RHINE-WESTPHALIA Brazil Dortmund Halle Manaus Mülheim Göttingen Leipzig Luxembourg Düsseldorf Luxembourg Cologne SAXONY DanielDaniel Hincapié, Hincapié, Bonn Jena Dresden ResearchResearch Engineer Engineer at at Marburg THURINGIA FraunhoferFraunhofer Institute, Institute, Bad Münstereifel HESSE MunichMunich RHINELAND Bad Nauheim PALATINATE Mainz Frankfurt Kaiserslautern SAARLAND Erlangen “Germany,“Germany, AustriaAustria andand SwitzerlandSwitzerland areare knownknown Saarbrücken Heidelberg BAVARIA Stuttgart Tübingen Garching forfor theirtheir outstandingoutstanding researchresearch opportunities.opportunities. BADEN- Munich WÜRTTEMBERG Martinsried Freiburg Seewiesen AndAnd academics.comacademics.com isis mymy go-togo-to portalportal forfor jobjob Radolfzell postings.”postings.” Publisher‘s Information MaxPlanckResearch is published by the Science Translation MaxPlanckResearch seeks to keep partners and
    [Show full text]
  • Sigmund Allein Unter Feinden Amazonjs
    7 Fragen an den Autor Thomas Sigmund zu seinem Buch „Allein unter Feinden? – Was der Staat für unsere Sicherheit tut – und was nicht“ Herr Sigmund, versagt der Staat beim Schutz seiner Bürger? Der Staat tut viel für die Sicherheit der Bürger. Justiz und Polizei arbeiten rund um die Uhr. Doch das alles reicht nicht. Woran machen Sie das konkret fest? Unsere innere Sicherheit ist bedroht wie noch nie seit Ende des Krieges. Einbrüche, U- Bahn-Treter, Cyberangriffe oder der Terror. Schauen Sie sich einfach die Hass- Postings im Internet, den wachsenden Rechtsextremismus oder die zunehmenden Angriffe auf Minderheiten an. Da ist etwas verrutscht in der Gesellschaft. Gibt es Gewalt nicht schon immer? Die derzeitige starke Verunsicherung der Bürger ist mehr als ein Gefühl. Eine einschneidende Zäsur waren die Vorkommnisse in der Silvesternacht in Köln 2015 an. Da waren nicht nur Polizei und Justiz weit über ihre Belastungsgrenze angekommen. Vor allem waren die Fehleinschätzungen der Politik und die mangelnde Handlungsfähigkeit des Staates erschreckend. Bis heute gibt es übrigens nur eine Handvoll Urteile gegen die Täter bei insgesamt 1200 Opfern. Doch es geht nicht nur um die Vorkommnisse auf der Kölner Domplatte Sondern? Wir haben auch eine steigende Zahl an Einbrüchen von international agierenden Einbrecherbanden aus Osteuropa, gegen die die Polizei machtlos scheint. Das einfache aber große Versprechen des Staates, das Privateigentum zu schützen ist zu oft nichts mehr wert. In den Polizeistatistiken wird zwar die Aufklärungsquote mit rund 15 Prozent beziffert; dazu zählen aber auch Fälle, die dann vor Gericht von vornherein nicht nachgewiesen werden können. So sinkt die tatsächliche Zahl auf nur rund 2,5 Prozent.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Imagewandel Von Helmut Kohl, Gerhard Schröder Und Angela Merkel Vom Kanzlerkandidaten Zum Kanzler - Ein Schauspiel in Zwei Akten
    Forschungsgsgruppe Deutschland Februar 2008 Working Paper Sybille Klormann, Britta Udelhoven Der Imagewandel von Helmut Kohl, Gerhard Schröder und Angela Merkel Vom Kanzlerkandidaten zum Kanzler - Ein Schauspiel in zwei Akten Inszenierung und Management von Machtwechseln in Deutschland 02/2008 Diese Veröffentlichung entstand im Rahmen eines Lehrforschungsprojektes des Geschwister-Scholl-Instituts für Politische Wissenschaft unter Leitung von Dr. Manuela Glaab, Forschungsgruppe Deutschland am Centrum für angewandte Politikforschung. Weitere Informationen unter: www.forschungsgruppe-deutschland.de Inhaltsverzeichnis: 1. Die Bedeutung und Bewertung von Politiker – Images 3 2. Helmut Kohl: „Ich werde einmal der erste Mann in diesem Lande!“ 7 2.1 Gut Ding will Weile haben. Der „Lange“ Weg ins Kanzleramt 7 2.2 Groß und stolz: Ein Pfälzer erschüttert die Bonner Bühne 11 2.3 Der richtige Mann zur richtigen Zeit: Der Mann der deutschen Mitte 13 2.4 Der Bauherr der Macht 14 2.5 Kohl: Keine Richtung, keine Linie, keine Kompetenz 16 3. Gerhard Schröder: „Ich will hier rein!“ 18 3.1 „Hoppla, jetzt komm ich!“ Schröders Weg ins Bundeskanzleramt 18 3.2 „Wetten ... dass?“ – Regieren macht Spass 22 3.3 Robin Hood oder Genosse der Bosse? Wofür steht Schröder? 24 3.4 Wo ist Schröder? Vom „Gernekanzler“ zum „Chaoskanzler“ 26 3.5 Von Saumagen, Viel-Sagen und Reformvorhaben 28 4. Angela Merkel: „Ich will Deutschland dienen.“ 29 4.1 Fremd, unscheinbar und unterschätzt – Merkels leiser Aufstieg 29 4.2 Die drei P’s der Merkel: Physikerin, Politikerin und doch Phantom 33 4.3 Zwischen Darwin und Deutschland, Kanzleramt und Küche 35 4.4 „Angela Bangbüx“ : Versetzung akut gefährdet 37 4.5 Brutto: Aus einem Guss – Netto: Zuckerguss 39 5.
    [Show full text]