DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendices to Framework

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendices to Framework Appendices - Statewide Framework for Groundwater Contamination Assessment and Management APPENDICES 1 Appendices - Statewide Framework for Groundwater Contamination Assessment and Management LIST OF APPENDICES 1 LISTING OF CONTAMINANTS AND CONTAMINANT SOURCES .................. 1 1.1 Contaminant Listing 1 1.2 Contaminants in Industrial Wastes 3 1.3 Water Quality Criteria 5 1.3.1 Drinking Water Quality Criteria and Suggested Standards (NHMRC, 1980, ANZECC 1992). ................................................................................................................ 0 1.3.2 Water Quality Indicators and Criteria - Stock and Irrigation Use .................................... 3 1.3.3 Water Quality Guidelines Recommended for some Food and Beverage Industries (concentrations in mg/L unless otherwise indicated)....................................... 5 1.3.4 Tabulation of the Average Daily Water Requirements for Livestock.............................. 0 1.3.5 Guideline Values For Pesticides In Raw Water Sources: NHMRC/AWRC (1987), NHMRC (1989). ................................................................................................... 0 1.3.6 Water Quality Guidelines Organics in for Raw Waters for Drinking Purposes subjected to coarse screening. (ANZECC, 1992). ............................................................ 2 1.3.7 Water Quality Criteria for Ecosystem Support (after EPAV, 1983)................................ 2 2 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GROUNDWATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS METHODS.................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Detail of analytical and sampling techniques 1968-1983. 4 2.2 Analytical Techniques used from 1983 onwards for analysis of groundwater samples, State Water Laboratories (RWC). 6 2.3 Changes in GSV pollution bore sampling techniques and pollution data storage 9 2.3.1 Quality Assurance ............................................................................................................ 10 2.3.2 Freshwater Stratification in Bores by Fractionation and Condensation Trickle............ 11 2.3.3 Sample Filtration.............................................................................................................. 11 2.3.4 Errors Propagated or initiated by Electronic Database Management............................. 12 3 GROUNDWATER POLLUTION MONITORING BORES LOCATION AND CONSTRUCTION DATA .................................................................................. 19 3.1 The Newer Basalts - Dual Aquifer Concept 19 3.2 Bore Construction (Western Suburbs) 20 3.2.1 Bore Construction a Transient Situation in the Western Suburbs.................................. 20 3.3 Details of Geological Survey and EPA funded Groundwater Monitoring Bores 21 3.3.1 List of Western Suburbs Pollution Monitoring Bores: ................................................... 34 3.4 Geological Survey Victoria (GSV) Basalt Survey Bores 38 3.5 Government Investigation Bores Located At Industrial Waste Disposal Sites (1973 - 1987). 39 3.5.1 Co-Disposal Industrial Landfills accepting Liquid Industrial Waste ............................. 39 3.5.2 Government Investigation bores drilled at Industrial Waste Lagoons and Unlined Disposal Pits....................................................................................................... 39 2 Appendices - Statewide Framework for Groundwater Contamination Assessment and Management 3.5.3 Government Investigation bores at Industrial Waste Injection sites or waste recharge pits ..................................................................................................................... 40 3.5.4 Government Investigation sites at Dairy Waste Injection sites. ..................................... 40 3.5.5 Sites Examined with Spillage and Fire Waters ............................................................... 40 4 REGIONAL GROUNDWATER POLLUTION MONITORING BORES ........... 42 4.1 Western Suburbs 42 4.2 Regional observation bores in the Northern Suburbs 42 4.3 Regional groundwater monitoring bores in the South Eastern Suburbs 42 5 GOVERNMENT INITIATED GROUNDWATER POLLUTION MONITORING PROGRAMS..................................................................................... 44 5.1 Government Investigation and Monitoring of Landfill Sites 44 5.1.1 Country landfill sites........................................................................................................ 44 5.1.2 Suburban Landfill Sites.................................................................................................... 44 5.1.2.1 Western Suburbs .............................................................................................................. 44 5.1.2.2 Northern and Eastern Suburbs......................................................................................... 45 5.2 Summary Monitoring Results from Tullamarine Industrial Waste Disposal Landfill (Co Disposal). 47 5.3 Summary Results from Bores at Other South Eastern Landfills 49 5.4 Summary of Results of the monitoring of the Bunny Road Landfill, Oakleigh 50 5.5 Pollution Bore Status December 1986 and Summer 1990-1991 51 5.5.1 Western Suburbs Monitoring Bore Status....................................................................... 51 5.5.2 Tullamarine Monitoring Bore Status............................................................................... 52 5.5.3 South Eastern Suburbs Monitoring Bore Status.............................................................. 54 5.5.4 Northern Suburbs Monitoring Bore Status...................................................................... 54 5.5.5 Country Pollution Monitoring Bores............................................................................... 55 5.6 Private Groundwater Observation bores 55 5.7 Health Department Land Waste Management (Delegated Authority) Licences 1971 - 1986 with monitoring bores. 56 6 PRIVATE GROUNDWATER BORES DRILLED AS A REQUIREMENT OF ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION ACT 1970,................... 57 6.1 Additional Private and Self-Monitoring Bores 57 7 MISCELLANEOUS GSV GROUNDWATER POLLUTION INVESTIGATIONS....................................................................................................... 65 7.1 Collection of Landfill Leachate Samples. 65 7.2 Column Leachate Attenuation Tests. 65 7.3 Chemical and Nuclear Tracers; Radio Nuclide Tracing Techniques in the Basalt Aquifer. 65 7.4 Insitu and Biological Treatment. 65 7.5 DO and Conductivity Profiles of Groundwater Monitoring Bores. 65 3 Appendices - Statewide Framework for Groundwater Contamination Assessment and Management 7.6 Fluoride Concentrations in Groundwater at Portland. 65 7.7 Nitrate Concentrations on the Nepean Peninsula. 65 7.8 Arsenic Concentrations in Central Victorian Bedrock Waters. 66 7.9 Acid (pH < 3) Pit Waters 66 7.10 EPA Golf Course Bores Monitoring Program (16th March 1978) 66 7.11 List in Alphabetical Order to the Titles of Groundwater Pollution Files Cited or Referred to in this Report 67 8 SUMMARY OF SELECTED METROPOLITAN LANDFILL SITES................. 70 8.1 Surface discharge of Landfill Leachate or Landfill Burst 77 9 DEVELOPMENT OF PROTECTIOIN POLICY IN GOVERNMENT COMMITTEES AND APPEAL HEARINGS ........................................................... 78 9.1 State Development Committees 78 9.2 Ministerial Statement 78 9.3 Interdepartmental Committee on Aquifer Pollution (ICAP) 81 9.4 Interdepartmental Committee for Liquid Waste Disposal (ICLWD) 83 9.5 Milestone Appeal Hearings: TCPAB and the AAT 85 9.5.1 The Sunshine Tip Appeals............................................................................................... 85 9.5.2 The Shire of Flinders Appeal........................................................................................... 86 9.5.3 Camberwell Appeal (Nos. 1990/26374 et al.)................................................................. 88 9.5.4 ACI - Lang Lang East (AAT No. 1991/036953)............................................................. 90 9.5.5 Lilydale Appeal (Nos. 1992/006131 & 1992/016807) ................................................... 92 9.5.6 Ondit Appeal (Nos. 1996/5620 and 1996/31995)........................................................... 94 9.6 Task Force for New Regional Tip Site Approvals (TFFNRTS) 98 10 TERRAIN, RISK, SENSITIVITY AND VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS.......... 100 11 VICTORIAN TOWNSHIPS THAT UTILISE GROUNDWATER...................... 105 4 Appendices - Statewide Framework for Groundwater Contamination Assessment and Management LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. The concentration of Total Iron in analyses from 1968 - 1992, showing the change in laboratories in 1983. 9 Figure 2. Variation in the three year moving average illustrating steps in concentration at the change in the water laboratories................................................................................................................10 Figure 3. Location of Pollution Monitoring Bores in the Western Suburbs (after Riha and Kenley, 1978) 14 Figure 4. Bore location inserts a, b, c (after Riha and Kenley 1978)..........................................................15 Figure 5. Bore locations at the Tullamarine Industrial Waster Landfill, insert d (after Shugg, 1979).....16 Figure 6. Pollution bores locations in the South Eastern Suburbs (after Thompson and Harris, 1972 and Shugg, 1976). ............................................................................................................................18 Figure 7. Bore construction for the Western
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria: Stage One
    Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria: Stage One Volume 1: Contextual Overview, Methodology, Lists & Appendices Prepared for Heritage Victoria October 2008 This report has been undertaken in accordance with the principles of the Burra Charter adopted by ICOMOS Australia This document has been completed by David Wixted, Suzanne Zahra and Simon Reeves © heritage ALLIANCE 2008 Contents 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Context ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Project Brief .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 Contextual Overview .................................................................................................................. 7 3.0 Places of Potential State Significance .................................................................................... 35 3.1 Identification Methodology .......................................................................................................... 35 3.2 Verification of Places .................................................................................................................. 36 3.3 Application
    [Show full text]
  • Corangamite Heritage Study Stage 2 Volume 3 Reviewed
    CORANGAMITE HERITAGE STUDY STAGE 2 VOLUME 3 REVIEWED AND REVISED THEMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY Prepared for Corangamite Shire Council Samantha Westbrooke Ray Tonkin 13 Richards Street 179 Spensley St Coburg 3058 Clifton Hill 3068 ph 03 9354 3451 ph 03 9029 3687 mob 0417 537 413 mob 0408 313 721 [email protected] [email protected] INTRODUCTION This report comprises Volume 3 of the Corangamite Heritage Study (Stage 2) 2013 (the Study). The purpose of the Study is to complete the identification, assessment and documentation of places of post-contact cultural significance within Corangamite Shire, excluding the town of Camperdown (the study area) and to make recommendations for their future conservation. This volume contains the Reviewed and Revised Thematic Environmental History. It should be read in conjunction with Volumes 1 & 2 of the Study, which contain the following: • Volume 1. Overview, Methodology & Recommendations • Volume 2. Citations for Precincts, Individual Places and Cultural Landscapes This document was reviewed and revised by Ray Tonkin and Samantha Westbrooke in July 2013 as part of the completion of the Corangamite Heritage Study, Stage 2. This was a task required by the brief for the Stage 2 study and was designed to ensure that the findings of the Stage 2 study were incorporated into the final version of the Thematic Environmental History. The revision largely amounts to the addition of material to supplement certain themes and the addition of further examples of places that illustrate those themes. There has also been a significant re-formatting of the document. Most of the original version was presented in a landscape format.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2016 [7] Mslisting.Aspx (Accessed 19/3/16) [8]
    St Stephen’s church knew him as Edward Tho- [4] mas. http://www.naa.gov.au/collection/explore/defence/service- records/army-wwi.aspx (accessed 16/3/16) [5 ]https://www.awm.gov.au/blog/2008/07/18/the-worst-night- in-australian-military-history-fromelles/ (accessed 16/3/16) [6] 215 http://recordsearch.naa.gov.au/SearchNRetrieve/Interface/ ViewImage.aspx?B=3072649 (accessed 17/3/16) Journal of the Waverley Historical Society May 2016 [7] http://recordsearch.naa.gov.au/NameSearch/Interface/Ite msListing.aspx (accessed 19/3/16) [8] Villers-Bretoneux Tower J TurtonVillers-Bretoneux http://recordsearch.naa.gov.au/SearchNRetrieve/Interface/ A Soldier of the Great WarA Soldier of the Great Turton J DetailsRe- Established 1970 ports/ItemDetail.aspx?Barcode=5831002&isAv=N (accessed 19/3/16) Incorporated in Victoria The memorials in the Glen Waverley State Reg. No. A 0006377 A School and St Stephen and St Mary’s church Recent Research Enquiries PATRON and at the Civic Centre give the names of Dr Morna Sturrock AM many more Waverley men than I was able to This year there have been many enquiries find. Many more of our Waverley men died at about previous land use – one from the old C7 PRESIDENT MarJo Angelico 9544 8792 Gallipoli and other theatres of the Great War. road reservation, another about the moving back of Glen Waverley station, and the resultant SECRETARY car park on railway land, and another on the Norma Schultz 9802 9332 various stages of the construction of the EDITOR 11 April 1987 Philip Johnstone Monash freeway.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Junction Estate and Matthew's Hill Precinct
    GRAND JUNCTION ESTATE & MATTHEW’S HILL PRECINCT GRAND JUNCTION ESTATE AND MATTHEW’S HILL PRECINCT 1 CONTEXT PTY LTD Locality History Two important factors influenced the development of Sunshine from a rural area in the mid-1800s to the industrial centre it had become by the 1950s. The first was the railway boom of the 1880s, when it became one of the main junctions in Victoria. The second was the establishment of the Sunshine Harvester Works in 1906-1907 by Hugh Victor McKay, giving the township its current name. In the 1880s Melbourne was booming, being one of the fastest growing cities in the world. The boom had a major impact on the development of the Brimbank area. The metropolis was expanding westward as new suburbs were developed along the newly established railway lines. As well as residential development, new and relocated factories flourished in the Brimbank area (Ford & Vines 2000:56). The wealth of connecting railway lines in Brimbank was a key factor in encouraging industries to settle in the area. Braybrook Junction Station opened in 1885 and St. Albans Station in 1887. Railway sidings went off from the main lines to quarries and new factories. The locality of Braybrook Junction, as Sunshine was first known, was described as ‘the greatest junction in Victoria’. New industries relating to the railway as well as agricultural implements thrived at Braybrook Junction. The Braybrook Implement Company started one of the first factories there, producing mainly farm implements. The factory, established on Devonshire Road next to the new railway junction was later taken over by H.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Potentially Contaminated Land in Victoria – Challenges for Local Government
    Potentially contaminated land in Victoria – challenges for local government Mark Beaufoy* In making planning decisions about potentially contaminated land (PCL) councils must decide whether the land is suitable for the proposed use and development. Planning policy encouraging urban consolidation and increas- ing property values are leading to the transformation of former industrial land to residential and other sensitive uses. However, the potential restrictions on land-use and the costs of investigating, remediating and redeveloping contaminated land can be significant. In making planning decisions about PCL, councils often face significant pressure to be commercial and practical, and to balance other planning objectives in performing legal obligations associated with PCL. At the same time, as a number of cases before the courts have demonstrated, councils can also face significant legal liability (and expensive and time-consuming litigation) if statutory obligations relating to PCL are not properly performed. The regulatory framework for PCL in Victoria is mature, having developed over the past 20 years following amendments to the Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Vic) and the introduction of Ministerial Direction No 1 – Potentially Contaminated Land on 9 October 1989. However, further work is required to improve some aspects of the regulatory framework, give clearer guidance to councils in making decisions about PCL and avoid the uncertainty created by some recent decisions reviewed by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. INTRODUCTION Much of the recent focus of Melbourne 2030: Planning for Sustainable Growth and Melbourne @ 5 Million has been on Melbourne’s growth areas, review of the urban growth boundary, the precinct structure plan process and improving transport infrastructure.1 An important part of this policy is also consolidating development and employment around Central Activity Districts (Box Hill, Broadmeadows, Dandenong, Footscray, Frankston and Ringwood), Activity Centres and more intensive development along major transport routes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rubbish Piled Up
    IIII IIII IIII IIIII IIIII IIIIIII III IIIII III 5643"14 A monthly publicauon produced by Caulfield Council for the residents of this City. Volume 6, No. 9 Thursday, Sept. 26 THE RUBBISH PILED UP Caulfield Garbage Men Strike On Monday September 1st Caulfield gar­ bagemen joined the rest of the garbagemen of the metropolitan area in their support of the men at Waverley. Rubbish bins were people coped well with not emptied and resi­ the storage of extra dents were prevented rubbish. The Caulfield from taking rubbish to City Council organised the Depot. As the pile two separate distribu­ of rubbish in Neerim tions of garbage bags Rd. grew, striking men and residents of most maintained a picket areas are to be com­ line at the Depot plimented on the lack entrance. During this of rubbish left littering difficult time, most the streets. Pictured left. As the strike continued the garbage piled up at the Neerim Road Depot. Below. Caulfield Garbagemen maintain a _picket line at the entrance to the Depot. Hands warm, but still a cold shoulder for those wanting to dump rubbish. NEW GARBAGE SYSIEAI APPROVED Garbage disposal has become a major issue within the community of late and the Caulfield City Coun­ cil acknowledges its responsibilities in this area. Local Government is charged with the collection and removal of waste materials but is constantly faced with spiralling costs and other problems. The City of Caulfield in recognising the difficulties involved is moving into the 80's with a new concept in garbage disposal - a total waste col­ lection service.
    [Show full text]
  • Maribyrnong Planning Scheme Municipal Strategic Statement
    MARIBYRNONG PLANNING SCHEME 21.01 MUNICIPAL PROFILE 16/11/2006 C31 21.01-1 Introduction 19/01/2006 VC37 How will the City of Maribyrnong look and feel and function in 15 or 20 year’s time? The trends which are operating now, and the opportunities for redevelopment and change which exist here, show quite clearly that there will be major physical changes within the city in the foreseeable future. Major and rapid change, amounting to the complete re-creation of some areas, will occur in a horse-shoe shaped area within a kilometre or so of the city’s eastern, northern and western boundaries. On the other hand, in most of the central areas of the city, change, if it occurs at all, will be slow and subtle; consolidating and enhancing existing character rather than re-creation. These physical changes will bring about significant cultural, social, economic and environmental changes. The Council is committed to bringing about these changes. The primary issue is to influence change to achieve the outcomes which are carefully considered, fair and just to all, which will enhance the environment and economic and social opportunities, and bring to life Council’s mission of building a diverse yet cohesive inner city community where everyone can contribute to the life of the city. Achieving the best outcomes from change requires a description of what is wanted. The process of change needs to be carefully managed to increase future opportunities for, choice in, and access to, housing, employment, leisure, recreation, entertainment, shopping, and education. These are the foundations of our quality of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Brimbank City Council Enterprise Agreement 8, Ea8 2018
    [2019] FWCA 1793 DECISION Fair Work Act 2009 s.185—Enterprise agreement Brimbank City Council (AG2018/6115) BRIMBANK CITY COUNCIL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 8, EA8 2018 Local government administration COMMISSIONER CIRKOVIC MELBOURNE, 25 MARCH 2019 Application for approval of the Brimbank City Council Enterprise Agreement 8, EA8 2018. [1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Brimbank City Council Enterprise Agreement 8, EA8 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Brimbank City Council. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement. [2] The Employer has provided two sets of written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. [3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. [4] The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union; the Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia; and the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they each want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations. 1 [2019] FWCA 1793 [5] The Agreement was approved on 25 March 2019 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 1 April 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report No. 4
    AOP Gf^ Auditor-General VICTORIA of Victoria Special Report No 4 ''XJ# Court Closures Si-/ ?^' Victoria ^^ November 1986 VICTORIA Report of the Auditor - General SPECIAL REPORT No 4 Court Closures in Victoria Ordered by the Legislative Assembly to be printed MELBOURNE F D ATKINSON GOVERNMENT PRINTER 1985-86 No. 130 .v^°%°^^. 1 MACARTHUR STREET MELBOURNE, VIC. 3002 VICTORIA The Honourable the Speaker, November 19 86 Legislative Assembly, Parliament House, MELBOURNE 3000 Sir, Pursuant to the provisions of Section 48 of the Audit Act 1958, I hereby transmit a report concerning court closures in Victoria. The primary purpose of conducting reviews of this nature is to provide an overview as to whether public funds in programs selected for examination, are being spent in an economic and efficient manner consistent with government policies and objectives. Constructive suggestions are also provided in line with the ongoing process of modifying and improving financial management and accountability controls within the public sector. I am pleased to advise that this review has already proven to be of benefit to the government departments involved, as evidenced by their positive replies detailing initiatives already undertaken or evolving. I am also hopeful that this report will assist in resolving other issues, including the development of a policy on the use and management of public buildings. The co-operation and assistance received by my staff from the departments during the course of the review was appreciated. It is my view that there is a growing awareness by government agencies of the advantages to be gained from such reviews, particularly the provision of independent advice on areas of concern.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Existing Policy Context
    City of Greater Dandenong Green Wedge Management Plan | APPENDIX A: EXISTING POLICY CONTEXT APPENDIX A: EXISTING POLICY CONTEXT City of Greater Dandenong Green Wedge Management Plan | APPENDIX A: EXISTING POLICY CONTEXT . Protecting important productive agricultural areas such as Werribee GREATER DANDENONG PLANNING South, the Maribyrnong River flats, the Yarra Valley, Westernport SCHEME and the Mornington Peninsula. Protect areas of environmental, landscape and scenic value. The Greater Dandenong Planning Scheme provides the high level strategic context within which the Green Wedge Management Plan needs to be . Protect significant resources of stone, sand and other mineral considered. resources for extraction purposes. STATE PLANNING POLICY FRAMEWORK (SPPF) ENVIRONMENTAL AND LANDSCAPE VALUES Clause 12.04‐2 Landscapes includes the strategy to: The SPPF (contained in clauses 11 to 19 of the Greater Dandenong Planning Scheme) sets out statewide planning policy. The most relevant policies . Improve the landscape qualities, open space linkages and include those contained in the ‘Settlement’, ‘Environmental and Landscape environmental performance in Green Wedges and conservation areas Values’ and ‘Economic Development’. and non‐urban areas. SETTLEMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Clause 11.04‐6 Green Wedges. This policy aims to protect Green Wedges Clause 17.02‐3 State significant industrial land lists a few industrial areas of Metropolitan Melbourne from inappropriate development. Strategies to of state significance including Dandenong South. achieve this are: . Ensure strategic planning and land management of each Green Wedge area to promote and encourage its key features and related values. Support development in the Green Wedge that provides for environmental, economic and social benefits. Consolidate new residential development within existing settlements and in locations where planned services are available and Green Wedge area values can be protected.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Magazine of the Australian Institute of Genealogical Studies Inc. March 2017 Vol. XV No. 5 $12.00
    Official magazine of the Australian Institute of Genealogical Studies Inc. March 2017 Vol. XV No. 5 $12.00 AIGS Research and Look Up Services AIGS Annual Luncheon 2017 Are you seeking information on a missing ancestor or would you like to know more about your family? If you are seeking someone to assist with your family history please don’t hesitate to contact us as our experienced team of volunteer Researchers love nothing better than solving a mystery. Research Fees Date: Sunday 28th May Members $25, Non-Members $40 per hour. (The minimum initial charge is two hours per person). Venue: Box Hill Golf Club Look-Up Fees 202 Station Street, Box Hill Members: $12, Non Members $20 per look up. Time: 12.00 noon for 12.30 If you would like to join the list of our satisfied clients, please go to the AIGS website www.aigs.org.au, then Cost: $45 per head (drinks at own cost) select Research for full information and application A special guest speaker is being arranged and you forms. Alternately contact the AIGS office on 9877 3789. will also be there to hear the announcements of the winners and entrants of the Alexander Henderson Any queries can be sent either by e-mail to and the Don Grant Awards for 2016 whilst having [email protected] or mail them to the Research Co-ordinator, AIGS, PO Box 339, Blackburn, the opportunity to meet the winners and browse Victoria, 3130. their books. During the function you will have an We look forward to assisting you in your family history opportunity to mix with other AIGS members and quest in the near future.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria
    SURVEY OF POST-WAR BUILT HERITAGE IN VICTORIA STAGE TWO: Assessment of Community & Administrative Facilities Funeral Parlours, Kindergartens, Exhibition Building, Masonic Centre, Municipal Libraries and Council Offices prepared for HERITAGE VICTORIA 31 May 2010 P O B o x 8 0 1 9 C r o y d o n 3 1 3 6 w w w . b u i l t h e r i t a g e . c o m . a u p h o n e 9 0 1 8 9 3 1 1 group CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Background 7 1.2 Project Methodology 8 1.3 Study Team 10 1.4 Acknowledgements 10 2.0 HISTORICAL & ARCHITECTURAL CONTEXTS 2.1 Funeral Parlours 11 2.2 Kindergartens 15 2.3 Municipal Libraries 19 2.4 Council Offices 22 3.0 INDIVIDUAL CITATIONS 001 Cemetery & Burial Sites 008 Morgue/Mortuary 27 002 Community Facilities 010 Childcare Facility 35 015 Exhibition Building 55 021 Masonic Hall 59 026 Library 63 769 Hall – Club/Social 83 008 Administration 164 Council Chambers 85 APPENDIX Biographical Data on Architects & Firms 131 S U R V E Y O F P O S T - W A R B U I L T H E R I T A G E I N V I C T O R I A : S T A G E T W O 3 4 S U R V E Y O F P O S T - W A R B U I L T H E R I T A G E I N V I C T O R I A : S T A G E T W O group EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this survey was to consider 27 places previously identified in the Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria, completed by Heritage Alliance in 2008, and to undertake further research, fieldwork and assessment to establish which of these places were worthy of inclusion on the Victorian Heritage Register.
    [Show full text]