QUANTITATIVE AQUATIC TOXICITY MEASURES of PHARMACEUTICALS and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS (Ppcps) and THEIR SUBLETHAL and LETHAL EFFECTS in AQUATIC ORGANISMS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

QUANTITATIVE AQUATIC TOXICITY MEASURES of PHARMACEUTICALS and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS (Ppcps) and THEIR SUBLETHAL and LETHAL EFFECTS in AQUATIC ORGANISMS QUANTITATIVE AQUATIC TOXICITY MEASURES OF PHARMACEUTICALS AND PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS (PPCPs) AND THEIR SUBLETHAL AND LETHAL EFFECTS IN AQUATIC ORGANISMS by Harveer Singh Srain Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Environmental Studies at Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia August 2020 © Copyright by Harveer Singh Srain, 2020 Dedicated to my beloved wife, mother and brother for their unwavering support and sacrifices ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………………......vi LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………..viii ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………....ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED…………………………………………………......x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………......xiv CHAPTER 1: Introduction………………………………………………………..............1 1.1 Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs)…………………………….1 1.2 Overview of the problem………………………………………………………….1 1.3 Background to the study…………………………………………………………..6 1.3.1 A review of the global problem……………………......................................6 1.3.2 PPCPs in aquatic environment of Canada……………………………..........7 1.4 Research objectives..................................................................................................8 1.5 Methodological approach.........................................................................................9 1.6 Thesis organization..................................................................................................9 CHAPTER 2: A systematic literature review of the aquatic toxicity of PPCPs and their sublethal and lethal effects in aquatic organisms.............11 2.1 Introduction............................................................................................................11 2.1.1 Risk of PPCPs in the aquatic environment...................................................11 2.1.2 Literature review on aquatic toxicity of PPCPs............................................14 2.2 Methods..................................................................................................................15 2.2.1 Prioritization approach..................................................................................15 2.2.2 Selection of priority PPCPs...........................................................................16 iii 2.2.3 Review structure for priority PPCPs.............................................................19 2.2.4 Identification of aquatic organisms affected by PPCPs................................20 2.2.5 Identification of sublethal and lethal effects of PPCPs................................20 2.2.6 Identification of threshold and environmentally relevant concentrations of PPCPs..............................................................................22 2.2.7 Identification water quality guidelines and environmental risk assessments...........................................................................................22 2.2.8 Generation of species sensitivity distributions (SSDs).................................22 2.3 Results....................................................................................................................23 2.3.1 Reporting of priority PPCPs..........................................................................23 2.3.2 Aquatic organisms affected by PPCPs..........................................................24 2.3.3 Summary assessment of aquatic organisms reported to be affected by priority PPCPs............................................................................34 2.3.4 Sublethal effects of PPCPs on aquatic organisms.........................................35 2.3.5 Summary assessment of sublethal effects of PPCPs on aquatic organisms......................................................................................................53 2.3.6 Lethal effects of PPCPs on aquatic organisms.............................................56 2.3.7 Summary assessment of lethal effects of PPCPs on aquatic organisms.......72 2.3.8 Calculation of standard deviation (SD)........................................................75 2.3.9 Threshold concentrations of PPCPs for key aquatic species........................77 2.3.10 Environmental relevant concentrations of PPCPs.....................................82 2.3.11 Water quality guidelines and environmental risk assessments..................83 2.3.12 Species sensitivity distributions (SSDs)....................................................85 2.4 Discussion..............................................................................................................89 2.5 Recommendations for future research...................................................................94 iv 2.6 Conclusion.............................................................................................................95 CHAPTER 3: Conclusions................................................................................................98 3.1 Summary of research.............................................................................................98 3.1.1 Key findings..................................................................................................99 3.1.2 Research gaps.............................................................................................102 3.2 Management implications...................................................................................103 3.3 Management solutions........................................................................................105 3.3.1 Rational use of PPCPs................................................................................105 3.3.2 Advancement in wastewater treatment technologies..................................105 3.3.3 Appropriate disposal of PPCPs...................................................................106 3.3.4 Extended producer responsibility...............................................................106 3.4 Concluding remarks............................................................................................107 REFERENCES................................................................................................................109 APPENDIX A: Table A.1................................................................................................148 APPENDIX B: References for Tables 2.4 and 2.5..........................................................151 v LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1. PPCPs in aquatic ecosystems identified in three key studies for relative risk, adverse effects, and toxicity to aquatic organisms.......................18 Table 2.2. Definitions of sublethal and lethal concentrations, predicted environmental concentrations, and risk quotients for specific aquatic organisms, compiled and comparatively assessed..........................................21 Table 2.3. Total number of articles identified for each priority PPCPs through initial and advanced searches...........................................................................24 Table 2.4. Number of studies on aquatic organisms affected by 12 priority PPCPs organized by taxonomic classification of organisms and PPCPs.........25 Table 2.5. Rank order of aquatic organisms from highest to lowest number of studies on affects after exposure to priority PPCPs.........................................30 Table 2.6. Sublethal effects of carbamazepine..................................................................36 Table 2.7. Sublethal effects of erythromycin.....................................................................39 Table 2.8. Sublethal effects of fluoxetine..........................................................................41 Table 2.9. Sublethal effects of metoprolol.........................................................................42 Table 2.10. Sublethal effects of naproxen.........................................................................43 Table 2.11. Sublethal effects of ofloxacin.........................................................................44 Table 2.12. Sublethal effects of sertraline.........................................................................44 Table 2.13. Sublethal effects of sulfamethoxazole............................................................45 Table 2.14. Sublethal effects of bisphenol A.....................................................................46 Table 2.15. Sublethal effects of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate.........................................48 Table 2.16. Sublethal effects of nonylphenol....................................................................49 Table 2.17. Sublethal effects of triclosan...........................................................................51 Table 2.18. Lethal effects of priority pharmaceuticals, organized by compound, organism, and exposure time.......................................................57 vi Table 2.19. Lethal effects of priority personal care products, organized by compound, organism, and exposure time.......................................................65 Table 2.20. Calculation of mean and standard deviations (SD) for EC50 values expressed in mg/L................................................................................76 Table 2.21. Threshold concentrations of priority PPCPs for key aquatic species for sublethal effects...........................................................................78 Table 2.22. Threshold concentrations of priority PPCPs for key aquatic species for lethal effects.................................................................................80
Recommended publications
  • Effects of Emerging Infectious Diseases on Amphibians: a Review of Experimental Studies
    diversity Review Effects of Emerging Infectious Diseases on Amphibians: A Review of Experimental Studies Andrew R. Blaustein 1,*, Jenny Urbina 2 ID , Paul W. Snyder 1, Emily Reynolds 2 ID , Trang Dang 1 ID , Jason T. Hoverman 3 ID , Barbara Han 4 ID , Deanna H. Olson 5 ID , Catherine Searle 6 ID and Natalie M. Hambalek 1 1 Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; [email protected] (P.W.S.); [email protected] (T.D.); [email protected] (N.M.H.) 2 Environmental Sciences Graduate Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; [email protected] (J.U.); [email protected] (E.R.) 3 Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; [email protected] 4 Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York, NY 12545, USA; [email protected] 5 US Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; [email protected] 6 Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence [email protected]; Tel.: +1-541-737-5356 Received: 25 May 2018; Accepted: 27 July 2018; Published: 4 August 2018 Abstract: Numerous factors are contributing to the loss of biodiversity. These include complex effects of multiple abiotic and biotic stressors that may drive population losses. These losses are especially illustrated by amphibians, whose populations are declining worldwide. The causes of amphibian population declines are multifaceted and context-dependent. One major factor affecting amphibian populations is emerging infectious disease. Several pathogens and their associated diseases are especially significant contributors to amphibian population declines.
    [Show full text]
  • By Agabus Bipustulatus (Insecta, Coleoptera, Dytiscidae)
    Predation on Italian newt larva, Lissotriton italicus (Amphibia, Caudata, Salamandridae), by Agabus bipustulatus (Insecta, Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) LUIGI CORSETTI1 and GIANLUCA NARDI2 1 Via Adige, 45. I-04100 Latina, Italy. 2 Centro Nazionale per lo Studio e la Conservazione della Biodiversità Forestale - Corpo Forestale dello Stato. Strada Mantova, 29. I-46045 Marmirolo (MN), Italy. 2 Author for correspondence: [email protected] ABSTRACT — Predation of a larva of Lissotriton italicus by adults of a diving beetle (Agabus bipustulatus) on the Aurunci Mountains (central Italy, Latium region) is recorded. This is the first identified invertebrate predator of this Italian endemic newt. The possible role of this beetle in the local demographic control of the newt is briefly discussed. HE Italian Newt, Lissotriton italicus (Peracca), (Latina province, Castelforte, Monte Siola W-SW Tpreviously referred to the genus Triturus slope, 240 m a.s.l). No other amphibians occurred (Rafinesque), is endemic to central and southern in the pond, which was probably feebly trickle fed Italy. The northern most limits of its distribution by a very small spring. In this pond about 15 adults include an oblique area extended from the Ancona of a predaceous diving beetle, Agabus bipustulatus province (Marches region) South to Lepini (Linnaeus) (Insecta, Coleoptera, Dytiscidae) were Mountains (Latium region, Rome province), on observed attacking a larva of the Italian Newt. The the Adriatic and Tyrrhenian sides of the Apennines, larva was initially attacked by a single beetle that respectively (Corsetti et al., 2005; Balletto, 2006; was quickly followed by the others and was Scillitani et al., 2006; Scillitani & Tripepi, 2007). devoured, almost completely, in about 10-15 It is a euryoecious species living in a wide range seconds.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–20 Edition) § 16.14
    § 15.41 50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–20 Edition) Species Common name Serinus canaria ............................................................. Common Canary. 1 Note: Permits are still required for this species under part 17 of this chapter. (b) Non-captive-bred species. The list 16.14 Importation of live or dead amphib- in this paragraph includes species of ians or their eggs. non-captive-bred exotic birds and coun- 16.15 Importation of live reptiles or their tries for which importation into the eggs. United States is not prohibited by sec- Subpart C—Permits tion 15.11. The species are grouped tax- onomically by order, and may only be 16.22 Injurious wildlife permits. imported from the approved country, except as provided under a permit Subpart D—Additional Exemptions issued pursuant to subpart C of this 16.32 Importation by Federal agencies. part. 16.33 Importation of natural-history speci- [59 FR 62262, Dec. 2, 1994, as amended at 61 mens. FR 2093, Jan. 24, 1996; 82 FR 16540, Apr. 5, AUTHORITY: 18 U.S.C. 42. 2017] SOURCE: 39 FR 1169, Jan. 4, 1974, unless oth- erwise noted. Subpart E—Qualifying Facilities Breeding Exotic Birds in Captivity Subpart A—Introduction § 15.41 Criteria for including facilities as qualifying for imports. [Re- § 16.1 Purpose of regulations. served] The regulations contained in this part implement the Lacey Act (18 § 15.42 List of foreign qualifying breed- U.S.C. 42). ing facilities. [Reserved] § 16.2 Scope of regulations. Subpart F—List of Prohibited Spe- The provisions of this part are in ad- cies Not Listed in the Appen- dition to, and are not in lieu of, other dices to the Convention regulations of this subchapter B which may require a permit or prescribe addi- § 15.51 Criteria for including species tional restrictions or conditions for the and countries in the prohibited list.
    [Show full text]
  • Rodrigo Zieri
    Rodrigo Zieri INFLUÊNCIA HORMONAL SOBRE O SISTEMA PIGMENTAR EM Eupemphix nattereri (ANURA): EFEITOS DO ALPHA-MSH, ESTRADIOL E TESTOSTERONA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL PAULISTA INSTITUTO DE BIOCIÊNCIAS, LETRAS E CIÊNCIAS EXATAS SÃO JOSÉ DO RIO PRETO - SP PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM BIOLOGIA ANIMAL RODRIGO ZIERI INFLUÊNCIA HORMONAL SOBRE O SISTEMA PIGMENTAR EM EUPEMPHIX NATTERERI (ANURA): EFEITOS DO ALPHA-MSH , ESTRADIOL E TESTOSTERONA Tese apresentada para obtenção do título de Doutor em Biologia Animal, área de Biologia Animal, junto ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal do Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas da Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Campus de São José do Rio Preto. ORIENTADOR: PROF. DR. CLASSIUS DE OLIVEIRA CO-ORIENTADOR: PROF. DR. SEBASTIÃO ROBERTO TABOGA - 2010 - Zieri, Rodrigo. Influência hormonal sobre o Sistema Pigmentar em Eupemphix nattereri (Anura): efeitos do MSH, estradiol e testosterona / Rodrigo Zieri. - São José do Rio Preto : [s.n.], 2010. 106 f. : il. ; 30 cm. Orientador: Classius de Oliveira Co-orientador: Sebastião Roberto Taboga Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas 1. Células pigmentares viscerais. 2. Anuro - Morfologia. 3. Eupemphix nattereri. 4. MSH. 5. Estradiol. 6. Testosterona. I. Oliveira, Classius de. II. Taboga, Sebastião Roberto. III. Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas. IV. Título. CDU – 597.8 Ficha catalográfica elaborada pela Biblioteca do IBILCE Campus de São José do Rio Preto - UNESP RODRIGO ZIERI Influência Hormonal sobre o Sistema Pigmentar em Eupemphix nattereri (Anura): Efeitos do alpha-MSH , Estradiol e Testosterona BANCA EXAMINADORA TITULARES: Prof. Dr. Classius de Oliveira Professor Adjunto UNESP – São José do Rio Preto Orientador Profª.
    [Show full text]
  • Plasticity and Genetic Adaptation Mediate Amphibian and Reptile Responses to Climate Change Mark C
    Evolutionary Applications Evolutionary Applications ISSN 1752-4571 REVIEWS AND SYNTHESIS Plasticity and genetic adaptation mediate amphibian and reptile responses to climate change Mark C. Urban, Jonathan L. Richardson and Nicole A. Freidenfelds Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA Keywords Abstract common garden experiments, contemporary evolution, global change, local adaptation, Phenotypic plasticity and genetic adaptation are predicted to mitigate some of phenotypic plasticity the negative biotic consequences of climate change. Here, we evaluate evidence for plastic and evolutionary responses to climate variation in amphibians and Correspondence reptiles via a literature review and meta-analysis. We included studies that either Mark C. Urban, Department of Ecology and document phenotypic changes through time or space. Plasticity had a clear and Evolutionary Biology, University of ubiquitous role in promoting phenotypic changes in response to climate varia- Connecticut, 75 North Eagleville Road, Unit 3043, Storrs, CT 06269, USA. tion. For adaptive evolution, we found no direct evidence for evolution of Tel.: +1 860 486 6113; amphibians or reptiles in response to climate change over time. However, we fax: +1 860 486 6364; found many studies that documented adaptive responses to climate along spatial e-mail: [email protected] gradients. Plasticity provided a mixture of adaptive and maladaptive responses to climate change, highlighting that plasticity frequently, but not always, could ame- Received: 3 April 2013 liorate climate change. Based on our review, we advocate for more experiments Accepted: 5 September 2013 that survey genetic changes through time in response to climate change. Overall, doi:10.1111/eva.12114 plastic and genetic variation in amphibians and reptiles could buffer some of the formidable threats from climate change, but large uncertainties remain owing to limited data.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIAL EDITION Tim Halliday: Amphibian Ambassador
    Issue 120 (November 2018) ISSN: 1026-0269 eISSN: 1817-3934 Volume 26, number 1 www.amphibians.orgFrogLog Promoting Conservation, Research and Education for the World’s Amphibians SPECIAL EDITION Tim Halliday: Amphibian Ambassador Rediscovering Hope for the Longnose Harlequin Frog Why We Need More Amphibian-Focused Protected Areas Pseudophilautus hallidayi. Photo: Nayana Wijayathilaka. ... and so much more! FrogLog 26 (1), Number 120 (November 2018) | 1 FrogLog CONTENTS 3 Editorial TIM HALLIDAY: AMPHIBIAN AMBASSADOR 5 Reflections on the DAPTF 15 Leading by Example 7 Newt Scientist 16 Fish Became Newts… 8 Tim Halliday—The Red-Shoed Amphibian Professor 17 An International Ambassador for Amphibians 9 Bringing Worldwide Amphibian Declines into the Public 18 “I’m sorry I missed your talk…” Domain 19 Tim Halliday and AmphibiaWeb 10 Of Newts and Frogs 20 Tim Halliday and the Conservation of Italian Newts 12 Professor Tim Halliday: Amphibians’ Best Friend 21 Tim Halliday – Amphibian Champion 13 Tim Halliday’s Love of Amphibians 22 Singing hallidayi’s…! 14 “There once was a frog from Sri Lanka…” 23 A Voice of Encouragement – Thank you Tim! NEWS FROM THE ASA & ASG 24 Funding Metamorphoses Amphibian Red Listing: An 27 Business in Key Biodiversity Areas: Minimizing the Risk Update From the Amphibian RLA to Nature 25 Photographing Frogs and Other Amphibians” Ebook 28 Amphibians in Focus (ANFoCO): Brazilian Symposium 26 ASG Brazil Restructuring Process and Current Activities on Amphibian Conservation NEWS FROM THE AMPHIBIAN COMMUNITY 29 Queensland Lab
    [Show full text]
  • Feeding Strategies of Co-Occurring Newt Species Across Different Conditions of Syntopy: a Test of the “Within-Population Niche Variation” Hypothesis
    diversity Article Feeding Strategies of Co-occurring Newt Species across Different Conditions of Syntopy: A Test of the “Within-Population Niche Variation” Hypothesis Jennifer Mirabasso 1 , Alessandra M. Bissattini 1, Marco A. Bologna 1, Luca Luiselli 2, Luca Stellati 1 and Leonardo Vignoli 1,* 1 Department of Sciences, Roma Tre University, Viale Marconi, 446, 00146 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (J.M.); [email protected] (A.M.B.); [email protected] (M.A.B.); [email protected] (L.S.) 2 IDECC, Institute for Development, Ecology, Conservation and Cooperation, via G. Tomasi di Lampedusa 33, 00144 Rome, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-06-57336411; Fax: +39-06-57336321 Received: 15 April 2020; Accepted: 5 May 2020; Published: 7 May 2020 Abstract: Intraspecific trait variation in generalist animals is widespread in nature, yet its effects on community ecology are not well understood. Newts are considered opportunistic feeders that may co-occur in different syntopic conditions and represent an excellent model for studying the role of individual feeding specialization in shaping the population dietary strategy. Here, we investigated the diet of three newt species from central Italy occurring in artificial habitats in different coexistence conditions to test the predictions of the niche width (NW) variation hypotheses. Population NW did not vary among species and between presence and absence of coexisting species. An overall positive relationship between individual specialization and population NW was observed. However, this pattern was disrupted by the condition of syntopy with newt populations showing an individual NW variation invariant with population NW in presence of coexisting species, whereas it was larger in populations occurring alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Salamander Species Listed As Injurious Wildlife Under 50 CFR 16.14 Due to Risk of Salamander Chytrid Fungus Effective January 28, 2016
    Salamander Species Listed as Injurious Wildlife Under 50 CFR 16.14 Due to Risk of Salamander Chytrid Fungus Effective January 28, 2016 Effective January 28, 2016, both importation into the United States and interstate transportation between States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States of any live or dead specimen, including parts, of these 20 genera of salamanders are prohibited, except by permit for zoological, educational, medical, or scientific purposes (in accordance with permit conditions) or by Federal agencies without a permit solely for their own use. This action is necessary to protect the interests of wildlife and wildlife resources from the introduction, establishment, and spread of the chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans into ecosystems of the United States. The listing includes all species in these 20 genera: Chioglossa, Cynops, Euproctus, Hydromantes, Hynobius, Ichthyosaura, Lissotriton, Neurergus, Notophthalmus, Onychodactylus, Paramesotriton, Plethodon, Pleurodeles, Salamandra, Salamandrella, Salamandrina, Siren, Taricha, Triturus, and Tylototriton The species are: (1) Chioglossa lusitanica (golden striped salamander). (2) Cynops chenggongensis (Chenggong fire-bellied newt). (3) Cynops cyanurus (blue-tailed fire-bellied newt). (4) Cynops ensicauda (sword-tailed newt). (5) Cynops fudingensis (Fuding fire-bellied newt). (6) Cynops glaucus (bluish grey newt, Huilan Rongyuan). (7) Cynops orientalis (Oriental fire belly newt, Oriental fire-bellied newt). (8) Cynops orphicus (no common name). (9) Cynops pyrrhogaster (Japanese newt, Japanese fire-bellied newt). (10) Cynops wolterstorffi (Kunming Lake newt). (11) Euproctus montanus (Corsican brook salamander). (12) Euproctus platycephalus (Sardinian brook salamander). (13) Hydromantes ambrosii (Ambrosi salamander). (14) Hydromantes brunus (limestone salamander). (15) Hydromantes flavus (Mount Albo cave salamander).
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibia, Urodela)
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235246853 A new ergotaxonomy of the family Salamandridae Goldfuss, 1820 (Amphibia, Urodela) Article in Alytes · March 2009 CITATIONS READS 133 1,636 2 authors: Alain Dubois Jean Raffaëlli Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle French Urodela Group 307 PUBLICATIONS 6,658 CITATIONS 14 PUBLICATIONS 293 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Taxonomy and nomenclature of amphibians View project Observatory on Availability in Zoological Nomenclature View project All content following this page was uploaded by Alain Dubois on 28 May 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. March 2009 Volume 26, No 1-4 Alytes, 2009, 26 (1-4): 1-85. A new ergotaxonomy of the family Salamandridae Goldfuss, 1820 (Amphibia, Urodela) Alain Dubois* & Jean Raffaëlli** * Reptiles & Amphibiens, UMR 5202 CNRS OSEB, Département Systématique & Evolution, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, CP 30, 25 rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France <[email protected]> ** Penclen, 56420 Plumelec, France <jean.raff[email protected]> Several recent studies, particularly dealing with molecular phylogeny, have improved our knowledge of the relationships within the salamander family SALAMANDRIDAE. However, some only of these findings have resulted in formal taxonomic changes. In order to homogenize this taxonomy, we hereby recognize several new taxa at various ranks from subfamily to subspecies,
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (Ppcps) and Their Sublethal and Lethal Effects in Aquatic Organisms
    Environmental Reviews Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and their sublethal and lethal effects in aquatic organisms Journal: Environmental Reviews Manuscript ID er-2020-0054.R2 Manuscript Type: Review Date Submitted by the 08-Dec-2020 Author: Complete List of Authors: Srain, Harveer; School for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University Beazley, Karen; School for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, Walker, Tony;Draft Dalhousie University Faculty of Management, School for Resource and Environmental Studies, Suite 5010, 6100 University Avenue Is this manuscript invited for consideration in a Special Not applicable (regular submission) Issue? : Emerging contaminants, Pharmaceutical and personal care products Keyword: (PPCPs), Aquatic toxicity, Lethal and sublethal effects, Aquatic organisms © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 1 of 115 Environmental Reviews Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and their sublethal and lethal effects in aquatic organisms Harveer S. Srain, Karen F. Beazley, Tony R. Walker* School for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada * Corresponding author: Tony R. Walker ([email protected]) Draft 1 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Environmental Reviews Page 2 of 115 Abstract Pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) include over-the-counter and prescription drugs, veterinary drugs, fragrances, and cosmetics. PPCPs have been detected in aquatic environments at low concentrations and are emerging
    [Show full text]
  • First Screening for Batrachochytrium Salamandrivorans (Bsal) in Wild and Captive Salamanders from Italy
    SALAMANDRA 55(2) 124–126 15 May 2019 ISSNCorrespondence 0036–3375 Correspondence First screening for Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal) in wild and captive salamanders from Italy Elena Grasselli1, Giorgia Bianchi1, Lorenzo Dondero1, Vittoria Marchianò2, Marco Carafa3, Matteo Perrone4 & Sebastiano Salvidio1 1) Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra dell’Ambiente e della Vita (DISTAV), Università degli Studi di Genova, Corso Europa 26, 16132 Genova, Italy 2) Parco Nazionale del Pollino, Complesso monumentale Santa Maria della Consolazione, 85048 Rotonda (PZ), Italy 3) Parco Nazionale della Majella, Via Occidentale 6, 66016 Guardiagrele (CH), Italy 4) Parco Nazionale delle Cinque Terre, Via Discovolo snc, 19017 Manarola (SP), Italy Correspondence: Sebastiano Salvidio, e-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received: 17 January 2019 Accepted: 24 January 2019 by Stefan Lötters Amphibian populations are declining rapidly around the Within the Mediterranean, Italy hosts one the most di- world. Emerging infectious diseases increasingly cause verse amphibian faunae and many endemic salamanders, population declines, in particular two pathogenic chytrid such as the endemic genus Salamandrina, the Sardini- fungi affecting the skin of their hosts (e.g., Skerratt et an brook newt, Euproctus platycephalus, the Italian newt, al. 2007). In Southern Europe, disease outbreaks in Spain Lisso triton italicus, and several cave salamanders, genus and Sardinia have been attributed to the chytrid fungus Speleomantes (Sindaco et al. 2006). Therefore, the intro- Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, Bd (Bosch et al. 2001, duction of the highly pathogenic Bsal is expected to threat- Bielby et al. 2009), while in Central Europe, the patho- en Italian salamander diversity and to result in the loss of gen Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal) has been unique evolutionary amphibian lineages.
    [Show full text]
  • Austria) 84-87 ©Österreichische Gesellschaft Für Herpetologie E.V., Wien, Austria, Download Unter
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Herpetozoa Jahr/Year: 2005 Band/Volume: 18_1_2 Autor(en)/Author(s): Cabela Antonia, Schultschik Günter, Tiedemann Franz Artikel/Article: On the presence of a southeastern European Smooth Newt near Vienna (Austria) 84-87 ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at 84 SHORT NOTE HERPETOZOA 18 (1/2) Wien, 30. Juni 2005 SHORT NOTE On the presence of a southeastern v. graecus was so strong that the subspecif- European Smooth Newt near ic assignment was evident based on mor- phological and color-pattern characteristics Vienna (Austria) of breeding males (reddish nape stripe pres- ent; pronounced dorso-lateral ridges along The Smooth Newt form of middle and body sides; dorsal crest emerging from the northern Europe, and thereby the area of posterior nape, smooth, low, with vertical Vienna (Austria), is Triturus vulgaris vul- stripes; unspotted ventral caudal crest; dark, garis (LINNAEUS, 1758) (CABELA et al. 2001). thin caudal filament present, 6-8 mm long; In southeastern Europe (the Apennines- and webbing on hind feet dark, well developed - Balkan peninsula), and Asia Minor, T. vul- characters according to SCHMIDTLER 1983, garis is represented by morphologically and RAXWORTHY 1990 and SCHMIDTLER & FRAN- chorologically more or less defined forms, ZEN 2004). These Smooth Newts are now for example: T. v. schreiben (WOLTERSTORFF, identified as T. v. cf. graecus. 1914), T. v. meridionalis (BOULENGER, 1882) From the first molecular systematic and T. v. graecus (WOLTERSTORFF, 1905), analysis (r-RNA; MTV and MTG samples but also intermediary populations covering below) (W.
    [Show full text]