DOCSLIB.ORG

Industrial Water Technology Markets 2015 Publication Information Ii

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Industrial Water Technology Markets 2015 Publication Information Ii Table of contents Industrial Water Technology Markets 2015 Publication information ii Executive summary iii Global spending on water and wastewater treatment technologies for industry, 2015 iii Global spending on water and wastewater treatment by technology, 2013–2020 iv General drivers iv Industries v Global spending on water and wastewater treatment technologies by industry, 2013–2020 v 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Industrial water use 1 Figure 1.1 Water withdrawal and consumption by major industries, 2012 1 1.2 The market for industrial water and wastewater treatment 2 Figure 1.2 Icon key: industries 2 Figure 1.3 Global expenditure on water and wastewater treatment by industry, 2013–2020 3 Figure 1.4 Icon key: functions 3 Figure 1.5 Global expenditure on water and wastewater treatment by technology function, 2013–2020 4 Figure 1.6 Icon key: challenges 5 Figure 1.7 Icon key: applications 5 Figure 1.8 Water and wastewater treatment functions by industry and application 6 Figure 1.9 Global expenditure on water treatment technologies by application, 2013–2020 7 1.2.1 Forecast methodology 7 Figure 1.10 Global spending on water and wastewater treatment technologies in industry, 2015 8 Figure 1.11 Global spending on water and wastewater treatment in the industrial water market, 2015 9 Figure 1.12 Global market forecast data, 2013–2020 10 1.3 Characteristics of the industrial market 12 Figure 1.13 Selected investments in water treatment technologies, 2014 13 2. Upstream oil & gas 15 2.1 Top water treatment challenges 15 2.2 Water treatment needs 15 2.2.1 Shale gas/tight oil produced water treatment 16 2.2.1.1 Contaminants to be treated 16 Figure 2.1 Produced water treatment in the shale gas/tight oil industry 16 2.2.1.2 Drivers for new treatment technologies 17 2.2.2 Conventional onshore produced water management 17 2.2.2.1 Contaminants to be treated 17 Figure 2.2 Produced water treatment in the conventional oil and gas industry 17 2.2.2.2 Drivers for new treatment technologies 17 2.2.3 Offshore produced water management 18 2.2.3.1 Contaminants to be treated 18 Figure 2.3 Produced water treatment train for offshore oil and gas operations 18 2.2.3.2 Drivers for new treatment technologies 18 2.2.4 Reuse of produced water for steam (thermal) EOR 18 2.2.4.1 Contaminants to be treated 18 Figure 2.4 Treatment of produced water for reuse in SAGD operations 19 2.2.4.2 Gaps in technologies 19 2.2.4.3 Drivers for new treatment technologies 19 2.2.5 Coalbed methane produced water treatment 20 2.2.5.1 Contaminants to be treated 20 Figure 2.5 Treatment technologies for CBM produced water 20 2.2.5.2 Gaps in technologies 20 2.2.5.3 Drivers for new treatment technologies 21 2.2.6 Technologies for sulphate removal and low salinity water 21 2.2.6.1 Contaminants to be treated 21 Figure 2.6 Sulphate removal treatment trains 21 © GWI no copying without permission. Contact [email protected] vii Industrial Water Technology Markets 2015 2.2.6.2 Drivers for new treatment technologies 22 2.3 What do end users want from the water sector? 22 2.4 Market dynamics 23 Figure 2.7 Key players in the upstream oil and gas market for water treatment 23 2.4.1 System integrators 23 2.4.2 Emerging solutions 26 Figure 2.8 Emerging technologies in the upstream oil and gas industry 26 2.5 Market forecast 28 Figure 2.9 Capital expenditure on water and wastewater treatment in upstream oil and gas, 2013–2020 28 Figure 2.10 Total spending on water and wastewater treatment by technology, 2013–2020 29 Figure 2.11 Total spending on water and wastewater treatment by region, 2013–2020 29 2.5.1 Market drivers and restraints 30 2.5.1.1 Drivers 30 2.5.1.2 Restraints 30 Figure 2.12 Water treatment market forces in the upstream oil and gas industry 31 Figure 2.13 Total spending on water and wastewater treatment in upstream oil and gas, 2015 32 Figure 2.14 Market forecast data, 2013–2020 33 3. Refining 34 3.1 Top water treatment challenges 34 3.2 Water treatment needs 34 3.2.1 Process water 34 Figure 3.1 Water quality requirements for refinery process water streams 35 Figure 3.2 Typical process water treatment train 35 3.2.1.1 Cooling tower make-up 36 3.2.1.2 Boiler feedwater 36 3.2.1.3 Water for hydrocarbon processing 36 3.2.1.4 Drivers for new treatment technologies 36 3.2.2 Wastewater 36 3.2.2.1 Contaminants to be treated 37 3.2.2.2 Main technologies 37 Figure 3.3 Typical treatment train for wastewater treatment 37 3.2.2.3 Drivers for new treatment technologies 38 3.3 Market dynamics 39 Figure 3.4 Key players in the refining market for water treatment 39 3.3.1 System integrators 40 3.3.2 Emerging solutions 42 Figure 3.5 Emerging solutions in refinery water treatment 43 3.4 Market forecast 44 Figure 3.6 Capital expenditure on water and wastewater treatment in refining, 2013–2020 44 Figure 3.7 Total spending on water and wastewater treatment by technology, 2013–2020 45 Figure 3.8 Total spending on water and wastewater treatment by region, 2013–2020 45 3.4.1 Market drivers and restraints 46 Figure 3.9 Water treatment market forces in the refining industry 46 Figure 3.10 Total spending on water and wastewater treatment in refining, 2015 47 Figure 3.11 Market forecast data, 2013–2020 48 4. Mining 49 4.1 Top water treatment challenges 49 4.2 Water treatment needs 49 4.2.1 Water at the mine face 49 4.2.1.1 Main treatment technologies 50 4.2.1.2 Drivers for new treatment technologies 50 4.2.2 Process water 50 Figure 4.1 Treatment train for process water 50 4.2.2.1 Drivers for new treatment technologies 51 4.2.3 Tailings water treatment 51 4.2.3.1 Contaminants to be treated 51 Figure 4.2 Typical treatment of waste streams in mining 52 4.2.3.2 Main technologies 52 viii © GWI no copying without permission. Contact [email protected] Table of contents Sulphates 52 Cyanide 53 Selenium 53 Mercury 54 Salts 54 4.2.3.3 Drivers for new treatment technologies 54 4.3 What do end users want from the water sector? 54 4.4 Market dynamics 55 Figure 4.3 Key players in the mining market for water treatment 55 4.4.1 System integrators 56 4.4.1.1 General water treatment suppliers 56 4.4.1.2 Desalination specialists 57 4.4.2 Emerging solutions 58 Figure 4.4 Electrochemical technologies 58 Figure 4.5 Electrochlorination 58 Figure 4.6 Nanofiltration for sulphate removal 58 Figure 4.7 Metal recovery 59 Figure 4.8 Eutectic freeze crystallisation 59 4.5 Market forecast 60 Figure 4.9 Capital expenditure on water and wastewater treatment in mining, 2013–2020 60 Figure 4.10 Total spending on water and wastewater treatment by technology, 2013–2020 61 Figure 4.11 Total spending on water and wastewater treatment by region, 2013–2020 61 4.5.1 Market drivers and restraints 62 4.5.1.1 Drivers 62 4.5.1.2 Restraints 62 Figure 4.12 Water treatment market forces in the mining industry 62 Figure 4.13 Total spending on water and wastewater treatment in mining, 2015 63 Figure 4.14 Market forecast data, 2013–2020 64 5. Power generation 65 5.1 Top water treatment challenges 65 5.2 Water treatment needs 65 5.2.1 Boiler feedwater 65 Figure 5.1 Treatment train for boiler feedwater 65 5.2.2 Cooling tower 65 Figure 5.2 Water treatment processes in a recirculating cooling system 66 5.2.3 FGD wastewater 67 Figure 5.3 Physical-chemical treatment train for FGD wastewater 67 5.3 Market dynamics 68 Figure 5.4 Key players in the power generation market for water treatment 68 5.3.1 System integrators 68 5.3.2 Emerging solutions in power water treatment 71 Figure 5.5 Emerging technologies in power water treatment 71 5.4 Market forecast 72 Figure 5.6 Capital expenditure on water and wastewater treatment in power generation, 2013–2020 72 Figure 5.7 Total spending on water and wastewater treatment by technology, 2013–2020 73 Figure 5.8 Total spending on water and wastewater treatment by region, 2013–2020 73 5.4.1 Market drivers and restraints 74 5.4.1.1 Drivers 74 5.4.1.2 Restraints 74 Figure 5.9 Water treatment market forces in the power generation industry 74 Figure 5.10 Total spending on water and wastewater treatment in power, 2015 75 Figure 5.11 Market forecast data, 2013–2020 76 6. Food & beverage 77 6.1 Top water treatment challenges 77 6.2 Water treatment needs 77 6.2.1 Process water 77 Figure 6.1 Process water production in the food and beverage industry 77 6.2.1.1 Contaminants to be treated 78 © GWI no copying without permission. Contact [email protected] ix Industrial Water Technology Markets 2015 6.2.1.2 Main technologies 78 6.2.1.3 Gaps in technologies 78 6.2.1.4 Drivers for new treatment technologies 78 6.2.2 Wastewater treatment 79 Figure 6.2 Wastewater treatment process in the food and beverage industry 79 6.2.2.1 Contaminants to be treated 79 6.2.2.2 Main technologies 80 6.2.2.3 Gaps in technologies 80 6.2.2.4 Drivers for new technologies 81 6.3 Market dynamics 81 Figure 6.3 Key players in the food and beverage market for water treatment 81 6.3.1 System integrators 82 6.3.1.1 Water treatment specialists 82 6.3.1.2 General engineering companies for food and beverage production 83 6.3.2 Emerging solutions 84 Figure 6.4 Emerging technologies in the food and beverage industry 84 6.4 Market forecast 86 Figure 6.5 Capital expenditure on water and wastewater treatment in food and beverage, 2013–2020 86 Figure 6.6 Total spending on water and wastewater treatment by technology, 2013–2020 87 Figure 6.7 Total spending on water and wastewater treatment by region, 2013–2020 87 6.4.1 Market drivers and restraints 88 6.4.1.1 Drivers 88 6.4.1.2 Restraints 88 Figure 6.8 Water treatment market forces in the food and beverage industry 89 Figure 6.9 Total spending on water and wastewater treatment in food and beverage, 2015 90 Figure 6.10 Market forecast data, 2013–2020 91 7.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United States Patent 19 11 Patent Number: 5,364,534 Anselme Et Al
    US005364534A United States Patent 19 11 Patent Number: 5,364,534 Anselme et al. 45 Date of Patent: Nov. 15, 1994 54 PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR 4,872,991 10/1989 Kartels et al. ...................... 210/651 TREATING WASTE LIQUIDS 5,093,072 8/1991 Hitotsuyanagi et al. ........... 210/650 5,154,830 10/1992 Paul et al. ........................... 210/639 75 Inventors: Christophe Anselme, Le Vesinet; Isabelle Baudin, Nanterre, both of FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS France 2628337 9/1989 France . 73 Assignee: Lyonnaise Des Eaux - Dumez, 4018994 1/1992 Japan ................................ 210/195.2 Nanterre, France Primary Examiner-Frank Spear (21) Appl. No.: 129,387 Assistant Examiner-Ana Fortuna Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Pollock, Vande Sande & 22 Filed: Sep. 30, 1993 Priddy (30) Foreign Application Priority Data 57 ABSTRACT Oct. 2, 1992 FR France ................................ 92 1699 Process for purifying and filtering fluids, especially 51l Int. Cl............................................... BOD 61/00 water, containing suspended contaminants and using 52 U.S. Cl. .................................... 210/650; 210/660; gravity separation means as well as membrane separa 210/800; 210/805; 210/195.1; 210/195.2; tion means, in a finishing stage, comprising the step of 210/257.2 introducing a pulverulent reagent into the fluid stream 58) Field of Search ............... 210/650, 639, 800, 790, to be treated downstream of the gravity separation and 210/195.1, 195.2, 295, 805, 900, 257.2, 660 upstream of the membrane separation, wherein said 56) References Cited pulverulent reagent is recycled from the purge of the U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS membrane separation means to the upstream of the gravity separation means.
    [Show full text]
  • Refinery Wastewater Management Using Multiple Angle Oil-Water Separators
    REFINERY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT USING MULTIPLE ANGLE OIL-WATER SEPARATORS Kirby S. Mohr, P.E. Mohr Separations Research, Inc. 1278 FM 407 Suite 109 Lewisville, TX 75077 Phone: 918-299-9290 Cell: 918-269-8710 John N. Veenstra, Ph.D., P.E., Oklahoma State University Dee Ann Sanders, Ph.D., P.E. Oklahoma State University A paper presented at the International Petroleum Environment Conference in Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1998 ABSTRACT In this work, an overview of oil-water separation, as used in the petroleum refining industries, is presented along with case studies. Discussions include: impact of solids, legal aspects, and differing types of systems currently in use, along with their advantages and disadvantages. Performance information on separators is presented with an emphasis on new multiple angle coalescing plate technology for refinery wastewater management. Several studies are presented including a large (20,000 US GPM flow rate) system recently installed at a major US refinery. The separator was constructed by converting two existing API separators into four separators, and adding multiple angle coalescing plates to increase throughput and efficiency. A year of operating experience with this system indicates good performance and few problems. Other examples provide information on separators installed in the United States and other countries. Keywords: Oil-water separator, multiple angle, coalescence, refinery, wastewater management, petroleum, coalescing plate technology BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION Oil has been refined for various uses for at least 1000 years. An Arab handbook written by Al-Razi, in approximately 865 A.D., describes distillation of “naft” (naphtha) for use in lamps and thus the beginning of oil refining (Forbes).
    [Show full text]
  • Mixing Oil-Based Microencapsulation of Garlic Essential Oil: Impact of Incorporating Three Commercial Vegetable Oils on the Stability of Emulsions
    foods Article Mixing Oil-Based Microencapsulation of Garlic Essential Oil: Impact of Incorporating Three Commercial Vegetable Oils on the Stability of Emulsions Yunjiao Zhao 1, Rui Liu 1,* , Cuiping Qi 1, Wen Li 1, Mohamed Rifky 1, Min Zhang 2,*, Ping Xiao 3, Tao Wu 1 and Wenjie Sui 1 1 State Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin 300457, China; [email protected] (Y.Z.); [email protected] (C.Q.); [email protected] (W.L.); [email protected] (M.R.); [email protected] (T.W.); [email protected] (W.S.) 2 College of Food Science and Bioengineering, Tianjin Agricultural University, Tianjin 300384, China 3 Tianjin Chunfa Bio-Technology Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300300, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (R.L.); [email protected] (M.Z.) Abstract: The active components in garlic essential oil are easily degradable, which limits its ap- plication in the food industry. Vegetable oils (VOs) were used to improve the stability of garlic essential oil (GEO) emulsion. The volatile compounds of GEO and its mixtures with vegetable oils (VOs), including corn oil (CO), soybean oil (SO), and olive oil (OO) indicated that GEO-VO mixtures had a higher percentage of Diallyl disulfide and Diallyl trisulfide than pure GEO. Adding an appropriate amount of VOs promoted the GEO emulsion (whey protein concentrate and inulin as Citation: Zhao, Y.; Liu, R.; Qi, C.; Li, the wall materials) stability in order of CO > SO > OO. Evaluation of the encapsulation efficiency, W.; Rifky, M.; Zhang, M.; Xiao, P.; Wu, controlled release, and antimicrobial activity of GEO-VO microcapsules showed that the GEO was T.; Sui, W.
    [Show full text]
  • A Marine Waste Biorefinery
    A Marine Waste Biorefinery A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) at Newcastle University by Ahmed Said Hamed Al Hatrooshi November 2019 Abstract Biodiesel is a renewable alternative to ‘petro-diesel’. There is already an established, conventional production technology based on refined vegetable oils. However, this is always more expensive than producing petroleum-based diesel, mainly due to the feedstock cost. Use of a cheap, non- edible feedstock, such as waste shark liver oil (WSLO), would reduce the biodiesel production cost and make the process economically viable. WSLO is obtained by exposing sharks’ livers to the sun until they melt and collecting the oil produced. Sharks’ livers comprise 25-30% of their body weight. Historically, the discarded WSLO was used for waterproofing wooden boats. However, this application is no longer required, as modern boats are made of fibreglass. The excess WSLO derived from these discarded sharks’ livers has great potential for being further processed into valuable products, including biodiesel, squalene and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), such as eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic (DHA). The glyceride components of the WSLO can be converted into biodiesel using existing biodiesel processing technologies, while the squalene, EPA and DHA may be extracted and sold as value-added products through biorefinery processes. This study investigated the production of fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) from WSLO using both acid (sulfuric acid, H2SO4) and base (sodium hydroxide, NaOH) catalysts. Due to the high levels of free fatty acids (FFA) in WSLO, homogeneous alkali-catalysed transesterification was less effective than the acid-catalysed process, resulting in a maximum WSLO to FAME conversion of only 40% after 15 min at a 60°C temperature, a 1.5 wt.% of NaOH catalyst and a 6:1 molar ratio of methanol to WSLO.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15. Gravity Separation
    Chapter 15. Gravity Separation IS. INTRODUCTION Separation by density difference is a process that is as old as recorded history. Separation of gold by density difference dates back to at least 3,000 BC as depicted in writings from ancient Egypt. The principle employed in gravity separation goes back further in time to the formation and weathering of the rocks and the releasing of the minerals they contain and the transport of the mineral grains by heavy rains. It is the driving force for the formation of the alluvial deposits of precious metals and gemstones that have been worked since beyond recorded history as they still are today. Archaeological excavations have discovered mineral concentration activities such as the lead-silver concentrating plant in Attica, Greece, dating from 300-400 BC. So gravity separation has a long history as a mineral concentration process. Not all mineral combinations are amenable to this type of concentration technique. To determine the suitability of gravity separation processes to a particular ore type, a concentration criterion is commonly used. A concentration criterion (CC) can be defined as [1]: „ . „. SG of heavy mineral-SG of fluid ,<-,.. Concentration Criterion = (15.1) SG of light mineral - SG of fluid where SG = specific gravity (or density), and the fluid is typically water or air. Some concentration criterion ratios for minerals that are treated by gravity separation are given in Table 15.1. Table 15.1 Concentration criterion for some common minerals separated by gravity separation from a gangue of density 2650 kg/m3 Mineral Fluid CC Gold water 10.3 Gold air 6.8 Cassiterite water 3.5 Coal water 3.4 Hematite water 2.5 A guideline for separability by gravity based on this concentration criterion is given in Table 15.2.
    [Show full text]
  • References of Water Purification
    References Of Water Purification Ascensional Perceval bespatters, his groomer dousing encrusts unblushingly. Renaud is prescript and wheels simul while Jeroldsquirming extricate Raymundo crosswise misspend or introduces and officer. locally. Sometimes legit Saunders hightail her safranine canonically, but pigeon-toed Milli-Q Reference Water Purification System Milli-Q Type 1. Following is the top image of polymer surface where algae numbers of the team, is a reference entry or surface. If the purification of references and venting applications along with removal of. Water Purification & Desalinization Books Book Depository. The Procter Gamble Company developed P G Purifier of favor in conjunction the the Centers for perfect Control and Prevention CDC P G sachets. What color water purification mean Definitionsnet. Are Water Purifying Chemicals Safe by Control. Water Purification References TheWaterSite Water Softeners. VIDEO Solvatten in Nepal References World Health Organization Solvatten Swiss Federal Institute of Environmental Science and Technology EAWAG. References Behrman J R Alderman H Hoddinott J Singh P Bengtson L Shiyin L Wenxin S Shen Y Li G van der Kooij D Pitman G K. Access to dismantle clean water ultimately requires improvements over more current state police water filtration technology Membrane technologies for water purification. And purification is referred to. What is the paid water purification method? Different Methods of Water Purification and my Importance. How high water filters work Types of water filter. Water purification by membranes The role of polymer science. Smith in association with MWH 2013a Advanced Water Purification Facility must Report series of San Diego Water Purification Demonstration Project. School Projects on Water Purification Treatments Sciencing.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery of Inorganic Compounds from Spent Alkaline Pulping Liquor by Eutectic Freeze Crystallization and Supporting Unit Operations: a Review
    REVIEW ARTICLE bioresources.com Recovery of Inorganic Compounds from Spent Alkaline Pulping Liquor by Eutectic Freeze Crystallization and Supporting Unit Operations: A Review Martin A. Hubbe,*,a Emily M. A. Becheleni,b Alison E. Lewis,c Edward M. Peters,d Weixing Gan,e Guanzai Nong,f Sujata Mandal,g and Sheldon Q. Shi g After the kraft or soda pulping of lignocellulosic materials to produce pulp suitable for papermaking, the spent pulping liquor typically has been recovered by multi-effect evaporation, followed by incineration in a recovery boiler. This review article considers one unit operation, eutectic freeze crystallization (EFC), that may have potential to save some of the energy that is presently consumed in the evaporation step during recovery of inorganic chemicals from spent pulping liquor. Based on a review of the literature it appears that EFC can be employed to obtain relatively pure sodium sulfate and sodium carbonate, along with relatively pure water (in the form of ice) from the spent liquor, under the assumption that lignin previously has been removed by acidification and precipitation. Issues of inorganic scale formation, during the operation of an EFC process applied to lignin-free black liquor, will require research attention. The chemical reactions to regenerate the active pulping chemicals sodium hydroxide and sodium sulfide from sodium carbonate, sodium sulfate, and other compounds isolated by EFC can be carried out either in a separate operation or by returning the materials to the feed of an existing recovery
    [Show full text]
  • Shear-Force Based Stainless Steel Slag Modification for Chromium Immobilization
    ISIJ International, Vol. 59 (2019),ISIJ International,No. 3 Vol. 59 (2019), No. 3, pp. 583–589 Shear-Force Based Stainless Steel Slag Modification for Chromium Immobilization Qing ZHAO,1)* Chengjun LIU,1) Longhu CAO,1) Maofa JIANG,1) Baokuan LI,2) Henrik SAXÉN3) and Ron ZEVENHOVEN3) 1) Key Laboratory for Ecological Metallurgy of Multimetallic Mineral (Ministry of Education), School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110819 China. 2) School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110819 China. 3) Thermal and Flow Engineering Laboratory, Åbo Akademi University, Åbo/Turku, 20500 Finland. (Received on November 23, 2017; accepted on November 5, 2018; J-STAGE Advance published date: December 20, 2018) Immobilization of chromium in a stable spinel by modification is a powerful way to prevent chromium pollution of stainless steel (SS) slags. The precipitated spinel grain size is usually smaller than 30 μm, however, which limits the effectiveness of the modification. In the literature, very few efforts have been reported on promotion of spinel growth rate by optimizing the dynamic conditions. In this study, the effects of shear force on the spinel grain size evolution under isothermal conditions and during cooling were investigated. The experimental results indicate that the employment of shear force significantly changes the growth behavior of spinel at 1 500°C. The growth mechanism of spinel was studied by using crystal size distribution (CSD) theory, showing different regimes of supply-controlled Ostwald ripening, surface-controlled growth with decaying nucleation rate, and constant rate nucleation and growth at shear rates of 0 s −1, 10.83 s −1, and 21.67 s −1, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Current State of Fine Mineral Tailings Treatment: a Critical Review on Theory and Practice
    This is a repository copy of Current state of fine mineral tailings treatment: A critical review on theory and practice. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/85196/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Wang, C, Harbottle, D, Liu, Q et al. (1 more author) (2014) Current state of fine mineral tailings treatment: A critical review on theory and practice. Minerals Engineering, 58. 113 - 131. ISSN 0892-6875 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2014.01.018 (c) 2014, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Current State of Fine Mineral Tailings Treatment: A Critical Review on Theory and Practice Chen Wang, David Harbottle, Qingxia Liu and Zhenghe Xu* Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada Highlights Presented facts on escalating generation of fine mineral tailings worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Enhancement of Membrane Filtration Process via Nanomaterial Coatings for the Generation of Electrostatic Forces, Oil Barriers, and Joule Heating Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2j776395 Author Dudchenko, Alexander Vladimirovich Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Enhancement of Membrane Filtration Processes via Nanomaterial Coatings for the Generation of Electrostatic Forces, Oil Barriers, and Joule Heating A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Chemical and Environmental Engineering by Alexander Vladimirovich Dudchenko December 2016 Dissertation Committee: Dr. David Jassby, Chairperson Dr. Sharon Walker Dr. Jinyong Liu Copyright by Alexander Vladimirovich Dudchenko 2016 The Dissertation of Alexander Vladimirovich Dudchenko is approved: __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my adviser Dr. David Jassby for his mentorship and guidance, which grew me as an individual and a professional. His sage advice, patience, and passion for research have left a great imprint on my life and will continue to have lasting influence in the
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Concentrations of Dissolved Metals and Ammonia in Large Passenger Vessel Wastewater Discharges
    FEASIBILITY STUDY: REDUCING CONCENTRATIONS OF DISSOLVED METALS AND AMMONIA IN LARGE PASSENGER VESSEL WASTEWATER DISCHARGES FINAL June 1, 2010 Prepared for: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Cruise Ship Program Prepared by: 825 W. 8th Ave. Anchorage, AK 99501 AND SUB-CONTRACTOR TEAM Cruise Ship Wastewater Systems Evaluation Final Report ADEC CONTRIBUTORS: Max Schwenne OASIS Olga Stewart OASIS Cody Black, PE (State of Alaska) OASIS Joe Mercure OASIS Levia Shoutis OASIS Anita Erickson, PE (State of California) OASIS David Eley Cape International Patrick Eberhardt, PE (State of Washington) Coastwise Corporation Steve Anzelc, PE (State of Michigan) Burns & McDonnell Ira Donovan, MSF Burns & McDonnell Reinaldo González, PhD Burns & McDonnell Denise Koch Alaska DEC Albert Faure Alaska DEC Ed White Alaska DEC Feasibility Report Final.docx ii 6/3/2010 Cruise Ship Wastewater Systems Evaluation Final Report ADEC TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ v 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 2. BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................ 3 2.1. Cruise Ship General Permit .............................................................................. 3 2.2. Current State of Practice .................................................................................. 4 2.3. Sources of Technology
    [Show full text]
  • Knelson Concentrator
    UPGRADING OF GOLD GRAVITY CONCENTRATES A STUDY OF THE KNELSON CONCENTRATOR Liming Huang A thesis subrnitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fuifiiiment of the requirements for the Degree of Philosophy Department of Mining and Metaliurgical Engineering, McGill University Montreal, Canada National Library Bibliothèque nationale 1*1 of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. nie Wellington ûîtawaON K1AON4 OttawaON K1AOW Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence dowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of ths thesis in microfom, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/£ïlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantid extracts from it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. ABSTRACT In recent years. the Knelson Concentrator has become the predominant unit used for primary goid recovery by gravity . However. its application potential as a cleaner in the final gravity concentration stage and its separation mechanisms have not been well studied. In most Canadian gold mills. rougher gravity concentrates produced by the Knelson (operating at 60 gravity acceleration or 'g') are further upgraded with shaking tables.
    [Show full text]