Bridge Technology and Historical Scholarship
Proceedings of the First International Congress on Construction History, Madrid, 20th-24th January 2003, ed. S. Huerta, Madrid: I. Juan de Herrera, SEdHC, ETSAM, A. E. Benvenuto, COAM, F. Dragados, 2003. Bridge technology and historical scholarship Tom F. Peters Bridges have always fascinated both the layman and the down-to-earth group that we represent, the historian professional. Their structural concepts are simple and of technology. They can teach us how diverse visually easily understood: they are linear, carry traffic, technological thinking is and how our viewpoint of and cross a gulf. Symbolically their concept is more technology changes over time and even how it varies complex: they span from one realm to another, cross the between the fields of engineering, architecture, and deep uncertainties of «troubled waters,» and connect. construction. Bridges demonstrate human ingenuity and the triumph Architects and engineers view the same thing from over nature, contradict the physicallimitations of gravity entirely different standpoints. For istance, a by levitating traffic in the air, and make the impossible connection in the Bayonne Arch Bridge built in New reality. Cultural historians and theoreticians love them, Jersey by the engineer Othmar Amman in 1931 gives and it is not by chance that the Pope carries the title of differing information to engineers and architects pontifex maximus, the «supreme bridge-builder.» (Figures l & 2). When asked what they see in the Because of their linear simplicity and structural clarity, bridge s also provide ideal case studies for that / '" / "" / '\,P / /Y- / (P01NTI) A Figure 1 Steel connection on the Bayonne Bridge over the Kill van Figure 2 KUll' New Jersey by Othmar Ammann, 1931 (photo: T.
[Show full text]