DOCSLIB.ORG

Titan and Enceladus $1 B Mission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Titan and Enceladus $1 B Mission JPL D-37401 B January 30, 2007 Titan and Enceladus $1B Mission Feasibility Study Report Prepared for NASA’s Planetary Science Division Prepared By: Kim Reh Contributing Authors: John Elliott Tom Spilker Ed Jorgensen John Spencer (Southwest Research Institute) Ralph Lorenz (The Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory) KSC GSFC ARC Approved By: _________________________________ Kim Reh Dr. Ralph Lorenz Jet Propulsion Laboratory The Johns Hopkins University, Applied Study Manager Physics Laboratory Titan Science Lead _________________________________ Dr. John Spencer Southwest Research Institute Enceladus Science Lead Pre-decisional — For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only Titan and Enceladus Feasibility Study Report Table of Contents JPL D-37401 B The following members of an Expert Advisory and Review Board contributed to ensuring the consistency and quality of the study results through a comprehensive review and advisory process and concur with the results herein. Name Title/Organization Concurrence Chief Engineer/JPL Planetary Flight Projects Gentry Lee Office Duncan MacPherson JPL Review Fellow Glen Fountain NH Project Manager/JHU-APL John Niehoff Sr. Research Engineer/SAIC Bob Pappalardo Planetary Scientist/JPL Torrence Johnson Chief Scientist/JPL i Pre-decisional — For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only Titan and Enceladus Feasibility Study Report Table of Contents JPL D-37401 B This page intentionally left blank ii Pre-decisional — For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only Titan and Enceladus Feasibility Study Report Table of Contents JPL D-37401 B Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Study Objectives and Guidelines............................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Relation to Cassini-Huygens, New Horizons and Juno.......................................... 1-1 1.3 Technical Approach................................................................................................ 1-2 1.4 Costing Methodology..............................................................................................1-4 1.5 Cost Results............................................................................................................ 1-5 1.6 Risk Assessment ..................................................................................................... 1-7 1.7 Science Value..........................................................................................................1-8 1.8 Feasibility Assessment and Conclusions ................................................................ 1-9 1.8.1 Titan Missions.......................................................................................... 1-10 1.8.2 Enceladus Missions.................................................................................. 1-10 1.8.3 Conclusions 1-11 1.9 Recommendations................................................................................................. 1-11 2. METHODOLOGY............................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Overview................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Guidelines ............................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Team ....................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.4 Approach................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.4.1 Science and Measurement Objectives:....................................................... 2-2 2.4.2 Platforms and Mission Concepts................................................................ 2-2 2.4.3 Science Value............................................................................................. 2-4 2.4.4 Mission Cost............................................................................................... 2-4 2.4.5 Risk 2-4 2.4.6 Assessment of feasibility............................................................................ 2-5 3. TITAN SCIENCE AND PAYLOAD................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 The Importance of Titan – An Appealing and Broad Scientific Target ................. 3-1 3.2 Cassini Limitations and the Foundation for New Science...................................... 3-3 3.3 Titan Science Goals ................................................................................................ 3-3 3.3.1 Sources of Methane.................................................................................... 3-3 3.3.2 Condensation and Cloud Formation........................................................... 3-4 3.3.3 Conversion of Methane to Complex Organics in the Upper Atmosphere . 3-4 3.3.4 Aerosol Formation...................................................................................... 3-4 3.3.5 Surface Organic Inventory ......................................................................... 3-4 3.3.6 Geomorphological Processes and Transport of Organics .......................... 3-4 3.3.7 Surface Composition and Astrobiology ..................................................... 3-5 3.4 Rating and Down Selection of Mission Concepts .................................................. 3-5 3.5 Missions Rejected or Not Considered..................................................................... 3-6 3.6 Missions and Payload Studied ................................................................................ 3-7 3.6.1 Titan Orbiter 3-7 3.6.2 Aerobot 3-7 3.6.3 Long-Lived Lander.................................................................................... 3-8 iii Pre-decisional — For Planning and Discussion Purposes Only Titan and Enceladus Feasibility Study Report Table of Contents JPL D-37401 B 3.6.4 ‘Huygens-Like’ Probe................................................................................ 3-8 4. ENCELADUS SCIENCE AND PAYLOAD....................................................................... 4-1 4.1 The Importance of Enceladus ................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Enceladus Science Goals ........................................................................................ 4-2 4.2.1 Tidal Heating.............................................................................................. 4-2 4.2.2 Interior Structure ........................................................................................ 4-2 4.2.3 Composition 4-3 4.2.4 Tectonism 4-3 4.2.5 Cryovolcanism ........................................................................................... 4-3 4.2.6 Surface Processes....................................................................................... 4-4 4.2.7 Biological Potential.................................................................................... 4-4 4.3 Cassini Limitations ................................................................................................. 4-4 4.4 Rating and Down Selection of Mission Concepts .................................................. 4-5 4.5 Enceladus Plume Sample Return............................................................................ 4-7 4.6 Saturn Orbiter with Multiple Enceladus Flybys ..................................................... 4-8 4.7 Single Enceladus Flyby: The Simplest Possible Mission..................................... 4-10 5. MISSION ARCHITECTURE CONCEPTS......................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Overview................................................................................................................. 5-1 5.1.1 The Saturn System..................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.2 Architectures Studied................................................................................. 5-2 5.2 Travel to Saturn.......................................................................................................5-2 5.3 Mission Option Trades............................................................................................ 5-4 5.4 Aerocapture............................................................................................................. 5-5 5.5 Mission Architectures............................................................................................. 5-7 5.5.1 Titan Orbiter 5-7 5.5.2 Titan Aerobot............................................................................................. 5-9 5.5.3 Titan Lander 5-11 5.5.4 Enceladus Plume Sample Return ............................................................. 5-12 5.5.5 Saturn Orbiter with Enceladus Flybys ..................................................... 5-14 5.5.6 Titan Entry Probe..................................................................................... 5-16 5.5.7 Enceladus Single Flyby............................................................................ 5-17 6. FLIGHT SYSTEM CONCEPTS.......................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Overview................................................................................................................. 6-1 6.2 SEP Stage Design ..................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Planetary Science Division Status Report
    Planetary Science Division Status Report Jim Green NASA, Planetary Science Division January 26, 2017 Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory CommiBee Outline • Planetary Science ObjecFves • Missions and Events Overview • Flight Programs: – Discovery – New FronFers – Mars Programs – Outer Planets • Planetary Defense AcFviFes • R&A Overview • Educaon and Outreach AcFviFes • PSD Budget Overview New Horizons exploresPlanetary Science Pluto and the Kuiper Belt Ascertain the content, origin, and evoluFon of the Solar System and the potenFal for life elsewhere! 01/08/2016 As the highest resolution images continue to beam back from New Horizons, the mission is onto exploring Kuiper Belt Objects with the Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI) camera from unique viewing angles not visible from Earth. New Horizons is also beginning maneuvers to be able to swing close by a Kuiper Belt Object in the next year. Giant IcebergsObjecve 1.5.1 (water blocks) floatingObjecve 1.5.2 in glaciers of Objecve 1.5.3 Objecve 1.5.4 Objecve 1.5.5 hydrogen, mDemonstrate ethane, and other frozenDemonstrate progress gasses on the Demonstrate Sublimation pitsDemonstrate from the surface ofDemonstrate progress Pluto, potentially surface of Pluto.progress in in exploring and progress in showing a geologicallyprogress in improving active surface.in idenFfying and advancing the observing the objects exploring and understanding of the characterizing objects The Newunderstanding of Horizons missionin the Solar System to and the finding locaons origin and evoluFon in the Solar System explorationhow the chemical of Pluto wereunderstand how they voted the where life could of life on Earth to that pose threats to and physical formed and evolve have existed or guide the search for Earth or offer People’sprocesses in the Choice for Breakthrough of thecould exist today life elsewhere resources for human Year forSolar System 2015 by Science Magazine as exploraon operate, interact well as theand evolve top story of 2015 by Discover Magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • Venus Aerobot Multisonde Mission
    w AIAA Balloon Technology Conference 1999 Venus Aerobot Multisonde Mission By: James A. Cutts ('), Viktor Kerzhanovich o_ j. (Bob) Balaram o), Bruce Campbell (2), Robert Gershman o), Ronald Greeley o), Jeffery L. Hall ('), Jonathan Cameron o), Kenneth Klaasen v) and David M. Hansen o) ABSTRACT requires an orbital relay system that significantly Robotic exploration of Venus presents many increases the overall mission cost. The Venus challenges because of the thick atmosphere and Aerobot Multisonde (VAMuS) Mission concept the high surface temperatures. The Venus (Fig 1 (b) provides many of the scientific Aerobot Multisonde mission concept addresses capabilities of the VGA, with existing these challenges by using a robotic balloon or technology and without requiring an orbital aerobot to deploy a number of short lifetime relay. It uses autonomous floating stations probes or sondes to acquire images of the (aerobots) to deploy multiple dropsondes capable surface. A Venus aerobot is not only a good of operating for less than an hour in the hot lower platform for precision deployment of sondes but atmosphere of Venus. The dropsondes, hereafter is very effective at recovering high rate data. This described simply as sondes, acquire high paper describes the Venus Aerobot Multisonde resolution observations of the Venus surface concept and discusses a proposal to NASA's including imaging from a sufficiently close range Discovery program using the concept for a that atmospheric obscuration is not a major Venus Exploration of Volcanoes and concern and communicate these data to the Atmosphere (VEVA). The status of the balloon floating stations from where they are relayed to deployment and inflation, balloon envelope, Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis Radiation Environment
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20070014073 2019-08-30T00:44:36+00:00Z 1 Source of Acquisition NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Genesis Radiation Environment Joseph I. Minow* NASA Marshull Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812 USA Richard L. Altstatt' and William C. Skipworth* Jacobs Engineering, Marshall Space Flight Center Group, Huntsville, AL 35812 USA The Genesis spacecraft launched on 8 August 2001 sampled solar wind environments at L1 from 2001 to 2004. After the Science Capsule door was opened, numerous foils and samples were exposed to the various solar wind environments during periods including slow solar wind from the streamer belts, fast solar wind flows from coronal holes, and coronal mass ejections. The Survey and Examination of Eroded Returned Surfaces (SEERS) program led by NASA's Space Environments and Effects program had initiated access for the space materials community to the remaining Science Capsule hardware after the science samples had been removed for evaluation of materials exposure to the space environment. This presentation will describe the process used to generate a reference radiation Genesis Radiation Environment developed for the SEERS program for use by the materials science community in their analyses of the Genesis hardware. I. Introduction ASA's Space Environments and Effects (SEE) Program initiated the Surveying and Examination of Eroded N Returned Surfaces (SEERS) Initiative in 2003. The goal of the Initiative was to provide leadership in the engineering analysis of returned flight hardware by supporting a comprehensive effort to understand environmental effects due to solar W, ionizing radiation, plasmas, neutral contamination, meteoroids, and other conditions experienced during the mission (not primary science mission objectives).
    [Show full text]
  • The Mars 2001 Odyssey and the "Autogen" Process
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@USU AUTOGEN: The Mars 2001 Odyssey and the "Autogen" Process By Roy Gladden June 6, 2002 Jet Propulsion Laboratory / California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Abstract In many deep space and interplanetary missions, it is widely recognized that the scheduling of many commands to operate a spacecraft can follow very regular patterns. In these instances, it is greatly desired to convert the knowledge of how commands are scheduled into algorithms in order to automate the development of command sequences. In doing so, it is possible to dramatically reduce the number of people and work-hours that are required to develop a sequence. The development of the "autogen" process for the Mars 2001 Odyssey spacecraft is one implementation of this concept. It combines robust scheduling algorithms with software that is compatible with pre- existing "uplink" software, and literally reduced the duration of some sequence generation processes from weeks to minutes. This paper outlines the "autogen" tools and processes and describes how they have been implemented for the various phases of the Mars 2001 Odyssey mission. What is autogen? manually building the commands for lengthy and well- understood command sequences, efforts were made to The term "autogen" is applied in two different ways. develop software that would automatically schedule the First, "autogen," in its broadest sense, identifies a commands given certain input data. By taking the process that may be used to automatically generate knowledge for how commands were to be scheduled sequences for a spacecraft and, second, it is a Solaris and writing algorithms to replicate that knowledge, it script that has been used to facilitate this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Stardust Sample Return
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Stardust Sample Return Press Kit January 2006 www.nasa.gov Contacts Merrilee Fellows Policy/Program Management (818) 393-0754 NASA Headquarters, Washington DC Agle Stardust Mission (818) 393-9011 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. Vince Stricherz Science Investigation (206) 543-2580 University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. Contents General Release ............................................................................................................... 3 Media Services Information ……………………….................…………….................……. 5 Quick Facts …………………………………………..................………....…........…....….. 6 Mission Overview …………………………………….................……….....……............…… 7 Recovery Timeline ................................................................................................ 18 Spacecraft ………………………………………………..................…..……...........……… 20 Science Objectives …………………………………..................……………...…..........….. 28 Why Stardust?..................…………………………..................………….....………............... 31 Other Comet Missions .......................................................................................... 33 NASA's Discovery Program .................................................................................. 36 Program/Project Management …………………………........................…..…..………...... 40 1 2 GENERAL RELEASE: NASA PREPARES FOR RETURN OF INTERSTELLAR CARGO NASA’s Stardust mission is nearing Earth after a 2.88 billion mile round-trip journey
    [Show full text]
  • The Messenger Sept. 8Th GENESIS SUNDAY
    WHAT’S INSIDE: Stewardship and Finance……...pg. 2 Congregational News…………... pg. 3 Celebrating Lohmen……………..pg. 4 Adult Education…………………...pg. 5 Faith Through the Generations….pgs. 6-7 Community Events…………..pgs. 8-9 WPC Food Pantry………………..pg. 10 The Messenger Prayer Ministry & Groups…….pg. 11 Environmental Stewardship...pg. 12 VOLUME 89, ISSUE 8 Confirmation Class……………...pg. 12 AUGUST 2019 Sept. 8th GENESIS SUNDAY Bring the whole family and invite a friend for a day full of food, games, live music, and lots of wild surprises! 2 CONGREGATIONAL NEWS The Pastor Nominating Committee Report (PNC) Nine members of the congregation were nominated and elected to serve on the Pastor Nominating Committee (PNC). They are: Andrew Finkner, Michael Gregg, Steve Hughes, Jim Kinkennon, Sandi Larson, Deb Schorr, Alisha Stokes, Allen Wachter and Joyce Douglas, Moderator. These members represent the whole congregation and have the responsibility for nominating an individual to present to the congregation to serve as our Head of Staff. In the future months, the PNC will journey through the search process seeking to hear the call of Christ. The first step will be to review the documentation from our group meetings held last Fall which represents the needs of Westminster and then complete the Ministry Information Form. The PNC has received reading materials already and will begin meeting together in early August. The PNC plans to keep the congregation informed on the status of this search. Our journey begins……… Joyce Douglas, Moderator LOOKING AHEAD Sun. August 4th—Celebrating Lohmen, our sister church in Germany (after worship, meet in chancel) Tues., Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • Ralph Lorenz Johns Hopkins – Applied Physics Lab
    Space phySicS Seminar Ralph Lorenz Johns Hopkins – Applied Physics Lab Sailing the Seas of Titan, Saturn's Earth-Like Moon Thursday, September 19, 2013 725 Commonwealth Ave. Refreshments at 3:30pm in CAS 500 Talk begins at 4:00pm in CAS 502 Abstract: Oceanography is no longer just an Earth Science. The ongoing NASA/ESA Cassini mission - still making exciting discoveries 10 years after its arrival in the rich Saturnian system - has found that three seas of liquid hydrocarbons adorn Saturn’s giant, frigid moon Titan. Titan was already exotic, having a thick, organic-rich atmosphere, and a diverse landscape with mountains, craters, river channels and vast fields of sand dunes, but these seas, and hundreds of lakes, present a new environment (low gravity, dense atmosphere, hydrocarbon liquid) in which to explore familiar and important physical processes such as air:sea heat and moisture exchange, wind- driven currents and waves, etc. Moreover, Titan’s seas (notably the two largest ones, Kraken Mare and Ligiea Mare, about 1000km and 400km across, respectively) offer an appealing and accessible target for future Titan exploration. This talk will review the latest findings from Cassini, and its prospects for new discoveries as we move towards Titan’s northern summer solstice in 2017, and the opportunities for future exploration which might include (as at Mars) orbiters and landers, but also vehicles that can exploit Titan’s environment such as balloons or airplanes. The most affordable near-term prospect for in-situ exploration is a capsule to float in the seas of Titan, where after splashdown it would drift in the winds to make a traverse across the sea, measuring the liquid composition and turbidity, studying conditions with cameras and meteorological instruments, and exploring the seabed with a depth sounder.
    [Show full text]
  • Demonstrating Real-World Cooperative Systems Using Aerobots
    In Proceedings of the 9th ESA Workshop on Advanced Space Technologies for Robotics and Automation 'ASTRA 2006' ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, November 28-30, 2006 DEMONSTRATING REAL-WORLD COOPERATIVE SYSTEMS USING AEROBOTS Ehsan Honary1, Frank McQuade1, Roger Ward1, Ian Woodrow2, Andy Shaw3, Dave Barnes3, Matthew Fyfe4 1SciSys [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Clothier Road, Bristol BS4 5SS, UK TEL: +44 (117) 9717251, FAX: +44 (117) 9721846 2SEA [email protected] Systems Engineering & Assessment Ltd, Beckington Castle, Castle Corner, Beckington, Frome BA11 6TB, UK, TEL: +44 (1373) 852120, FAX: +44 (1373) 831133 3University of Wales Aberystwyth Andy Shaw: [email protected], Dave Barnes: [email protected] Computer Science Department, Penglais, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, SY23 3DB, Wales, UK TEL: +44 (1970) 621561, FAX: +44 (1970) 622455 4SCS [email protected] Systems Consultants Services Limited, Henley-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, England, RG9 2JN TEL: +44 (1491) 412102, FAX: +44 (1491) 412082 ABSTRACT Use of multiple autonomous robots for practical applications has become more important over the years [1][2][3][4]. The potential for applications of collective robotics is high, in particular in the aerospace environment. SciSys has been involved in the development of Planetary Aerobots funded by ESA for use on Mars and has developed image-based localisation technology as part of the activity. It is however possible to use the Aerobots in a different environment to investigate issues in regard with robotics behaviour such as data handling, communications, limited processing power, limited sensors, GNC, etc. This paper summarises the activity where Aerobot platform was used to investigate the use of multiple autonomous Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs), basically simulating their movement and behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Mythology in John Keats’S ‘Hyperion Poems’ and Dan Simmons’S Hyperion and the Fall of Hyperion
    PROTEAN DEITIES: CLASSICAL MYTHOLOGY IN JOHN KEATS’S ‘HYPERION POEMS’ AND DAN SIMMONS’S HYPERION AND THE FALL OF HYPERION by HERCO JACOBUS STEYN submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the subject ENGLISH at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: DR DW LLOYD February 2011 Declaration of Own Work Student number: 4198-288-6 I, the undersigned, declare that this dissertation, entitled “Protean Deities: Classical Mythology in John Keats’s ‘Hyperion Poems’ and Dan Simmons’s Hyperion and The Fall of Hyperion”, is my own work and that all the sources I have used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references. _____________________________ _____________________________ Signature: Mr HJ Steyn Date Acknowledgements I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to the following two individuals: • My supervisor, Dr David Lloyd, for his sustained support and guidance. As I have come to understand, there is a vast difference between knowing the path and walking the path, and he was the master of showing me the path, yet allowing me genuinely to find my own voice within the dissertation. • My wife, Leonét, for comprehending the importance of this dissertation to me personally, for continuously encouraging me to persist, for unshakably believing in my abilities, and, above all, for her unconditional love. Contents Summary .............................................................................................................................. i Introduction........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Titan a Moon with an Atmosphere
    TITAN A MOON WITH AN ATMOSPHERE Ashley Gilliam Earth 450 – Satellites of Jupiter and Saturn 4/29/13 SATURN HAS > 60 SATELLITES, WHY TITAN? Is the only satellite with a dense atmosphere Has a nitrogen-rich atmosphere resembles Earth’s Is the only world besides Earth with a liquid on its surface • Possible habitable world Based on its size… Titan " a planet in its o# $ght! R = 6371 km R = 2576 km R = 1737 km Ch$%iaan Huy&ns (1629-1695) DISCOVERY OF TITAN Around 1650, Huygens began building telescopes with his brother Constantijn On March 25, 1655 Huygens discovered Titan in an attempt to study Saturn’s rings Named the moon Saturni Luna (“Saturns Moon”) Not properly named until the mid-1800’s THE DISCOVERY OF TITAN’S ATMOSPHERE Not much more was learned about Titan until the early 20th century In 1903, Catalan astronomer José Comas Solà claimed to have observed limb darkening on Titan, which requires the presence of an atmosphere Gerard P. Kuiper (1905-1973) José Comas Solà (1868-1937) This was confirmed by Gerard Kuiper in 1944 Image Credit: Ralph Lorenz Voyager 1 Launched September 5, 1977 M"sions to Titan Pioneer 11 Launched April 6, 1973 Cassini-Huygens Images: NASA Launched October 15, 1997 Pioneer 11 Could not penetrate Titan’s Atmosphere! Image Credit: NASA Vo y a &r 1 Image Credit: NASA Vo y a &r 1 What did we learn about the Atmosphere? • Composition (N2, CH4, & H2) • Variation with latitude (homogeneously mixed) • Temperature profile Mesosphere • Pressure profile Stratosphere Troposphere Image Credit: Fulchignoni, et al., 2005 Image Credit: Conway et al.
    [Show full text]
  • DAVINCI: Deep Atmosphere Venus Investigation of Noble Gases, Chemistry, and Imaging Lori S
    DAVINCI: Deep Atmosphere Venus Investigation of Noble gases, Chemistry, and Imaging Lori S. Glaze, James B. Garvin, Brent Robertson, Natasha M. Johnson, Michael J. Amato, Jessica Thompson, Colby Goodloe, Dave Everett and the DAVINCI Team NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 690 8800 Greenbelt Road Greenbelt, MD 20771 301-614-6466 Lori.S.Glaze@ nasa.gov Abstract—DAVINCI is one of five Discovery-class missions questions as framed by the NRC Planetary Decadal Survey selected by NASA in October 2015 for Phase A studies. and VEXAG, without the need to repeat them in future New Launching in November 2021 and arriving at Venus in June of Frontiers or other Venus missions. 2023, DAVINCI would be the first U.S. entry probe to target Venus’ atmosphere in 45 years. DAVINCI is designed to study The three major DAVINCI science objectives are: the chemical and isotopic composition of a complete cross- section of Venus’ atmosphere at a level of detail that has not • Atmospheric origin and evolution: Understand the been possible on earlier missions and to image the surface at origin of the Venus atmosphere, how it has evolved, optical wavelengths and process-relevant scales. and how and why it is different from the atmospheres of Earth and Mars. TABLE OF CONTENTS • Atmospheric composition and surface interaction: Understand the history of water on Venus and the 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................... 1 chemical processes at work in the lower atmosphere. 2. MISSION DESIGN ..................................................... 2 • Surface properties: Provide insights into tectonic, 3. PAYLOAD ................................................................. 2 volcanic, and weathering history of a typical tessera 4. SUMMARY ................................................................ 3 (highlands) terrain.
    [Show full text]
  • Enceladus: Present Internal Structure and Differentiation by Early and Long-Term Radiogenic Heating
    Icarus 188 (2007) 345–355 www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Enceladus: Present internal structure and differentiation by early and long-term radiogenic heating Gerald Schubert a,b,∗, John D. Anderson c,BryanJ.Travisd, Jennifer Palguta a a Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California, 595 Charles E. Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1567, USA b Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, 603 Charles E. Young Drive East, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1567, USA c Global Aerospace Corporation, 711 West Woodbury Road, Suite H, Altadena, CA 91001-5327, USA d Earth & Environmental Sciences Division, EES-2/MS-F665, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA Received 30 May 2006; revised 27 November 2006 Available online 8 January 2007 Abstract Pre-Cassini images of Saturn’s small icy moon Enceladus provided the first indication that this satellite has undergone extensive resurfacing and tectonism. Data returned by the Cassini spacecraft have proven Enceladus to be one of the most geologically dynamic bodies in the Solar System. Given that the diameter of Enceladus is only about 500 km, this is a surprising discovery and has made Enceladus an object of much interest. Determining Enceladus’ interior structure is key to understanding its current activity. Here we use the mean density of Enceladus (as determined by the Cassini mission to Saturn), Cassini observations of endogenic activity on Enceladus, and numerical simulations of Enceladus’ thermal evolution to infer that this satellite is most likely a differentiated body with a large rock-metal core of radius about 150 to 170 km surrounded by a liquid water–ice shell.
    [Show full text]