NSS Armenia Global Assessment Final

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NSS Armenia Global Assessment Final Global Assessment of the National System of Official Statistics of the Republic of Armenia 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................................... 3 PREFACE ........................................................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................. 7 1. LEGAL BASIS ......................................................................................................... 11 1.1. Overview ......................................................................................................... 11 1.2. Potential Ambiguity Areas in the Law on State Statistics .............................. 12 1.3. The legal basis for other producers of official statistics.................................. 13 1.4. The legal basis for regular stakeholder involvement....................................... 14 1.5. Issues that may be considered in future revision process of the Law on State Statistics ................................................................................................. 15 1.6. Other relevant legislation ................................................................................ 15 2. NATIONAL SYSTEM OF OFFICIAL STATISTICS ............................................. 16 2.1. Structure of the national statistical system...................................................... 17 2.2. National statistical programming and system coordination mechanisms ....... 21 3. NATIONAL STATISTICAL SERVICE .................................................................. 22 3.1. Institutional mission ........................................................................................ 22 3.2. Organisation of the National Statistical Service.............................................. 22 3.2.1. Organisation of the central office of the NSS ................................... 23 3.2.2. Organisation of regional offices........................................................ 25 3.3. Resource management..................................................................................... 26 3.3.1. Finance and budgeting....................................................................... 26 3.3.2. Staff, recruitment, and training.......................................................... 27 3.3.3. Information technology..................................................................... 28 3.4. Internal and external monitoring of quality and performance......................... 29 3.5. Dissemination policy....................................................................................... 30 3.6. Relations with mains users of statistical information...................................... 34 3.6.1. Relations with the central government.............................................. 34 3.6.2. Relations with local governments ..................................................... 34 3.6.3. Liaison with research institutions and universities............................ 34 3.6.4. Liaison with the business community ............................................... 35 3.6.5. Relations with other user categories.................................................. 36 3 3.7. International cooperation................................................................................. 36 4. STATISTICAL DOMAINS...................................................................................... 37 4.1. Classifications ................................................................................................. 37 4.2. Demographic and social statistics ................................................................... 39 4.2.1. Demographic statistics ...................................................................... 39 4.2.2. Population census.............................................................................. 41 4.2.3. Armenian Integrated Living Conditions Survey (ILCS)................... 42 4.2.4. Labour market statistics..................................................................... 43 4.2.5. Education statistics............................................................................ 44 4.2.6. Health statistics.................................................................................. 44 4.2.7. Social protection statistics................................................................. 45 4.3. Macroeconomic statistics ................................................................................ 45 4.3.1. National accounts .............................................................................. 45 4.3.2. External trade statistics (goods) ........................................................ 48 4.3.3. Balance of payments ......................................................................... 48 4.3.4. Foreign direct investment, international investment position, external debt ...................................................................................... 49 4.3.5. Price statistics.................................................................................... 49 4.4. Business statistics............................................................................................ 51 4.4.1. Short-term business statistics ............................................................ 51 4.4.2. Energy statistics................................................................................. 51 4.4.3. Transport statistics............................................................................. 52 4.4.4. Tourism statistics............................................................................... 54 4.4.5. Construction statistics........................................................................ 54 4.4.6. Business registers .............................................................................. 55 4.5. Agriculture statistics........................................................................................ 56 4.6. Multi-domain statistics.................................................................................... 57 4.6.1. Environment statistics ....................................................................... 57 4.6.2. Statistics on information and communication technologies.............. 58 ANNEXES ........................................................................................................................ 60 ANNEX 1: AGENDA AND PERSONS MET DURING ASSESSMENT MISSIONS .. 60 ANNEX 2: LAW ON STATE STATISTICS OF REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA............... 67 ANNEX 3.1: SCIENTIFIC AND METHODOLOGICAL COUNCIL OF THE NATIONAL STATISTICAL SERVICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA – CHARTER ................................................................................................................ 77 4 ANNEX 3.2: SCIENTIFIC AND METHODOLOGICAL COUNCIL OF THE NATIONAL STATISTICAL SERVICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA – MEMBER LIST ........................................................................................................ 79 ANNEX 4: PROPOSALS FOR DISCUSSION IN FUTURE REVISION OF THE LAW.......................................................................................................................... 80 ANNEX 5: 2007-2009 THREE–YEAR STATE STATISTICAL WORK PROGRAMME OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA (TRANSLATED EXCEPRTS).............................................................................................................. 83 ANNEX 6: LIST OF INDICATORS SUBMITTED TO THE NSS FOR STATE STATISTICAL WORK BY BODIES IMPLEMENTING ADMINISTRATIVE STATISTICS............................................................................................................. 93 ANNEX 7: NSS ORGANIZATIONAL CHART…..………………………….…….…116 5 PREFACE The Global Assessment of the National System of Official Statistics of the Republic of Armenia (the Assessment) was jointly undertaken by the European Commission (Eurostat), European Free Trade Association (EFTA), and United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). The Assessment process was initiated in response to the request by the National Statistical Service of the Republic of Armenia (NSS) to the UNECE made in September 2008. The assessment is based on an extensive review performed during the two Assessment missions. The first mission took place during 21 – 27 January 2009; the assessor team included Mr. Anton Steurer, Mr. Arvydas Andreikenas and Ms. Alina Milasiute (all from Eurostat), Mr. Heinrich Brüngger, Mr. Petteri Baer and Ms. Tiina Luige (all from UNECE), as well as Mr. Jan Byfuglien from Norway/EFTA. Many internal and external partners were met, partly in parallel meetings (see Annex 1). Some written material was also made available by the National Statistical Service (NSS) in advance or during and after the visit. The second mission during 31 March – 2 April 2009 included Mr. Arvydas Andreikenas, Ms. Alina Milasiute, Mr. Petteri Baer, Ms. Tiina Luige, and Mr. Jan Byfuglien and collected information to complete the final Assessment report and draw conclusions. Major written inputs to this evaluation were the Law on State Statistics of the Republic of Armenia, Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC) on Data Module for the Republic of Armenia by International Monetary Fund (IMF Country Report No. 09/50, February 2009) and Armenia 2008 Compliance Monitoring Report prepared by the NSS. The first Assessment mission was also prepared through replies to the questionnaire sent out
Recommended publications
  • Strasbourg, 3 September 2003 MIN-LANG/PR (2003) 7 Initial Periodical Report Presented to the Secretary General of the Council Of
    Strasbourg, 3 September 2003 MIN-LANG/PR (2003) 7 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Initial Periodical Report presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 15 of the Charter ARMENIA The First Report of the Republic of Armenia According to Paragraph 1 of Article 15 of European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages June 2003, Yerevan 2 INTRODUCTION The Republic of Armenia signed the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages on May 11, 2001. In respect of Armenia the Charter has come into force since May 1, 2002. The RA introduces the following report according to Paragraph 1 of Article 15 of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. This report has been elaborated and developed by the State Language Board at the Ministry of Education and Science based on the information submitted by the relevant ministries NGOs and administrative offices, taking into consideration the remarks and suggestions made by them and all parties interested, while discussing the following report. PART I Historical Outline Being one of the oldest countries in the world, for the first time in its new history Armenia regained its independence on May 28, 1918. The first Republic existed till November 29, 1920, when Armenia after forced sovetalization joined the Soviet Union, becoming on of the 15 republics. As a result of referendum the Republic of Armenia revived its independence on September 21, 1991. Armenia covers an area of 29,8 thousand km2, the population is nearly 32000001. Armenia borders on Iran, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • UNFPA Armenia Country Programme Evaluation
    Third UNFPA Country Programme: Armenia 2016-2020 FINAL EVALUATION REPORT November 2019 Nov Source: https://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/map/profile/armenia.pdf r 20November 2016 Country Programme Evaluation: Armenia The analysis and recommendations of this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Population Fund, its Executive Board or the United Nations Member States. EVALUATION TEAM Team Leader Arlette Campbell White Evaluator Ada Babloyan Evaluator Lusine Kharatyan Evaluation Research Assistant and Interpreter Manana Mananyan 2 UNFPA Armenia CO Country Programme Evaluations Reference Group Composition Name Organisation 1. Mahbub Alam M&E Adviser, UNFPA 2. Tsovinar Harutyunyan Assistant Representative, UNFPA Armenia CO 3. Lusine Sargsyan Evaluation Manager, UNFPA Armenia CO 4. Anahit Safyan National Statistical Committee 5. Anahit Martirosyan Ministry of Labour and Social Issues 6. Zhanna Andreasyan Ministry of Labour and Social Issues 7. Nune Pashayan Head of the Mother and childcare department, Ministry of Health 8. Arman Hovhannisyan Head of UN Desk MFA Armenia 9. Mane Tadevosyan RC Office, Monitoring and Evaluation 10. Mikayel Khachatryan Human Rights Defender’s Office 11. Nelly Duryan RA Police 12. Anna Harutyunyan Individual consultant 13. Astghik Martirosyan Monitoring and Evaluation/Child Rights Systems Monitoring Specialist , UNICEF Acknowledgements The Evaluation Team would like to thank UNFPA for the opportunity to undertake the evaluation for the Government of the Republic of Armenia and UNFPA’s Third Country Programme. We are particularly grateful to the UNFPA Armenia Country Office staff members who, despite a very heavy workload and other commitments, were so generous with their time and responsive to the Team’s repeated requests, often at short notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in Armenia, Practical Law Country Q&A 8-638-0858 (2018)
    Doing Business in Armenia, Practical Law Country Q&A 8-638-0858 (2018) Doing Business in Armenia by Sedrak Asatryan, Aram Orbelyan, Janna Simonyan, Narine Beglaryan, Roustam Badasyan, Senior Associate and Ani Varderesyan, Concern Dialog Country Q&A | Law stated as at 01-May-2018 | Armenia A Q&A guide to doing business in Armenia. This Q&A gives an overview of key recent developments affecting doing business in Armenia as well as an introduction to the legal system; foreign investment, including restrictions, currency regulations and incentives; and business vehicles and their relevant restrictions and liabilities. The article also summarises the laws regulating employment relationships, including redundancies and mass layoffs, and provides short overviews on competition law; data protection; and product liability and safety. In addition, there are comprehensive summaries on taxation and tax residency; and intellectual property rights over patents, trade marks, registered and unregistered designs. This article is part of the global guide to doing business worldwide. For a full list of contents, please visit www.practicallaw.com/ dbi-guide. Overview 1. What are the key recent developments affecting doing business in your jurisdiction? With the inauguration of Armenia’s new president, the Constitution, as amended in 2015, has fully entered into force. Therefore, Armenia currently operates under a parliamentary system of government. The RA Tax Code, which was adopted in 2016, has replaced a number of separate laws regulating different types of taxes. It partially entered into force in 2017 and since the beginning of 2018 has been fully in force in Armenia. The New Civil Procedure Code of 2018 has recently entered into force.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Genocide Memorials in North America
    Mashriq & Mahjar 4, no. 1 (2017),59-85 ISSN 2169-4435 Laura Robson MEMORIALIZATION AND ASSIMILATION: ARMENIAN GENOCIDE MEMORIALS IN NORTH AMERICA Abstract The Armenian National Institute lists forty-flve Armenian genocide memorials in the United States and five more in Canada. Nearly all were built after 1980, with a significant majority appearing only after 2000. These memorials, which represent a considerable investment of time, energy, and money on the part of diasporic Armenian communities across the continent, followed quite deliberately on the pattern and rhetoric of the public Jewish American memorialization of the Holocaust that began in the 19705. They tend to represent the Armenian diasporic story in toto as one of violent persecution, genocide, and rehabilitation within a white American immigrant sphere, with the purpose of projecting and promoting a fundamentally recognizable story about diaspora integration and accomplishment. This article argues that the decision publicly to represent the Armenian genocide as parallel to the Holocaust served as a mode of assimilation by attaching diaspora histories to an already­ recognized narrative of European Jewish immigrant survival and assimilation, but also by disassociating Armenians from Middle Eastern diaspora communities facing considerable public backlash after the Iranian hostage crisis of 1980 and again after September 11,2001. INTRODUCTION For decades after the Armenian genocide, memorialization of the event and its victims remained essentially private among the large Armenian diaspora communities in the United States. But in the 1970s and 1980s, Armenian Americans began to undertake campaigns to fund and build public memorial sites honoring the victims and bringing public attention to the genocide.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Services and Their Role in Poverty Alleviation in Armenia - a Case Study of Karaberd Gold Mine
    UNDP/UNEP “Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services” Technical Assistance Project The report is prepared for United Nations Development Programme in Armenia within the frame of the project “Economic Valuation of ecosystem Services in Armenia”. The project is funded under umbrella of United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) joint global Poverty and Environment Initiative (PEI) and aims to contribute to poverty reduction and improved well-being of poor and vulnerable groups through mainstreaming the environment into national development processes Ecosystem Services and their Role in Poverty Alleviation in Armenia - A Case Study of Karaberd Gold Mine Final Report February 2014 This report has been developed in the scope of UNDP/UNEP join joint TA Project “Economic Valuation of ecosystem Services in Armenia” Implementing agency UNDP UNDP EG Portfolio Analyst Armen Marirosyan UNDP Programme Policy Adviser, EG portfolio, Project Georgi Arzumanyan coordinator UNDP Project Assistant Kristina Tereshchatova Project team: Project international consultant Camille Bann Project task leader Anastas Aghazaryan Project experts Davit Androyan Vram Tevosyan Lothar Guendling Georgi Fayvush Hrant Avetisyan Armen Amiryan Aida Tarloyan Armen Ghazaryan Arman Kandaryan Mikayel Avagyan Address: 14 Petros Adamyan str., 0010 Yerevan, Armenia UNDP Armenia Tel: (374 60) 530000; Fax: (+374 10) 543811 Web Site: http://www.am.undp.org E-mail: [email protected] 2 List of abbreviations EIE Environmental Impact Expertise
    [Show full text]
  • <Div Style="Position:Absolute;Top:293;Left
    RA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE YEREVAN STATE LINGUISTIC UNIVERSITY AFTER V. BRUSOV LANGUAGE EDUCATION POLICY PROFILE COUNTRY REPORT ARMENIA YEREVAN 2008 The report was prepared within the framework of Armenia-Council of Europe cooperation The group was established by the order of the RA Minister of Education and Science (N 210311/1012, 05.11.2007) Members of the working group Souren Zolyan – Doctor of Philological Sciences, Professor Yerevan Brusov State Linguistic University (YSLU), Rector, National overall coordinator, consultant Melanya Astvatsatryan– Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor YSLU, Head of the Chair of Pedagogy and Foreign Language Methodology Project Director (Chapters 1-3; 5; 10; 12) Aida Topuzyan – Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Docent YSLU, Chair of Pedagogy and Foreign Language Methodology (Chapter 8.2 – 8.5, 9.4) Nerses Gevorgyan – Ministry of Education and Science, YSLU, UNESCO Chair on Education Management and Planning (Chapter 11), Head of Chair Gayane Terzyan - YSLU, Chair of Pedagogy and Foreign Language Methodology (Chapters 4; 6; 7; 8.1) Serob Khachatryan – National Institute for Education, Department of Armenology and Socio-cultural Subjects (Chapter 9.1-9.3, 9.5-9.6) Karen Melkonyan, RA MES, Centre for Educational Programmes, Project expert Araik Jraghatspanyan – YSLU, Chair of English Communication, Project translator Bella Ayunts – YSLU, Chair of Pedagogy and Foreign Language Methodology, Project assistant LANGUAGE EDUCATION POLICY PROFILE COUNTRY REPORT - ARMENIA I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. PROJECT GOALS 2. COUNCIL OF EUROPE LANGUAGE EDUCATION POLICY: GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PRINCIPLES 3. REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA General information 3.1. Geographical position 3.2. RA administrative division 3.3. Demographic data 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia Progress in 2014 and Recommendations for Actions
    HIGH REPRESENTATIVE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION FOR EUROPEAN FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND COMMISSION SECURITY POLICY Brussels, 25.3.2015 SWD(2015) 63 final JOINT STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in Armenia Progress in 2014 and recommendations for actions Accompanying the document JOINT COMMUNICATION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2014 {JOIN(2015) 9 final} {SWD(2015) 64 final} {SWD(2015) 65 final} {SWD(2015) 66 final} {SWD(2015) 67 final} {SWD(2015) 68 final} {SWD(2015) 69 final} {SWD(2015) 70 final} {SWD(2015) 71 final} {SWD(2015) 72 final} {SWD(2015) 73 final} {SWD(2015) 74 final} {SWD(2015) 75 final} {SWD(2015) 76 final} {SWD(2015) 77 final} EN EN 1. OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTION This document reports on the progress made in the implementation of the EU-Armenia European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) Action Plan between 1 January and 31 December 2014. Developments outside this period are taken into consideration where relevant. This is not a general assessment of the political and economic situation in Armenia. Information on regional and multilateral sector issues is contained in the Eastern Partnership (EaP) Implementation Report. In October 2014 Armenia signed the Accession Treaty to the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU). In preparation for signing the treaty, which came into force on 2 January 2015, it implemented a roadmap with administrative and legislative measures in 20 areas of government policy. Despite the decision not to initial the negotiated Association Agreement with the EU in September 2013, including a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (AA/DCFTA), Armenia and the EU further continued their political and trade dialogue in 2014, in areas where this was compatible with Armenia’s new international EEU obligations.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Migration in Armenia: Existing Trends and Policy Options
    Ministry of Labour and Social International Organization for Issues of Armenia Migration LLAABBOOUURR MMIIGGRRAATTIIOONN IINN AARRMMEENNIIAA:: EEXXIISSTTIINNGG TTRREENNDDSS AANNDD PPOOLLIICCYY OOPPTTIIOONNSS R E P O R T O N N E E D S A S S E S S M E N T O F L A B O U R M I G R A T I O N M A N A G E M E N T I N A R M E N I A The Labour Migration Management Needs Assessment was conducted within the framework of the “Technical assistance to the Armenian Government to initiate labour migration arrangements” project funded by the IOM Development Fund Alexandre Devillard International Organization for Migration Yerevan 2012 International Organization for Migration Mission in Armenia: UN House, 14 Petros Adamian Street, 1st floor, Yerevan o010, Armenia Tel.: (+374 10) 58 56 92; 58 37 86 Fax: (+374 10) 54 33 65 http://www.iom.int/armenia; http://www.iom.am UDC 331.556 (479.25) The needs assessment was conducted within the framework of the IOM Project “Technical assistance to the Armenian Government to initiate labour migration arrangements” funded by the IOM Development Fund Prepared for publication by IOM Project Development and Implementation Unit in Armenia While IOM endeavours to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the content of this report, the views, findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the IOM and its Member States. IOM does not accept any liability for any loss which may arise from the reliance on information contained in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Istanbul Technical University Graduate School of Arts
    ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES MUSICS OF HARSIT VALLEY, NORTHEASTERN TURKEY Ph.D. THESIS Mustafa Kemal ÖZKUL Department of Music Music Doctoral Programme JUNE 2019 ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES MUSICS OF HARSIT VALLEY, NORTHEASTERN TURKEY Ph.D. THESIS Mustafa Kemal ÖZKUL (409122007) Department of Music Music Doctoral Programme Thesis Advisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Emine Şirin ÖZGÜN TANIR JUNE 2019 İSTANBUL TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ HARŞİT VADİSİ MÜZİKLERİ, KUZEYDOĞU TÜRKİYE DOKTORA TEZİ Mustafa Kemal ÖZKUL (409122007) Müzik Anabilim Dalı Müzik Doktora Programı Tez Danışmanı: Doç. Dr. Emine Şirin ÖZGÜN TANIR HAZİRAN 2019 Mustafa Kemal Özkul, a Ph.D. student of ITU Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences student ID 409122007, successfully defended the dissertation entitled “MUSICS OF HARSIT VALLEY, NORTHEASTERN TURKEY”, which he prepared after fulfilling the requirements specified in the associated legislations, before the jury whose signatures are below. Thesis Advisor : Assoc. Prof. Dr.Emine Şirin ÖZGÜN TANIR .............................. Istanbul Technical University Date of Submission : 20 May 2019 Date of Defense : 24 June 2019 v vi To Robert Reigle and all brave academicians, vii viii FOREWORD Dissertations are written by a group of people, not a single person. I have always felt the support of so many people without whom I could not have written this dissertation. I would like to express my gratitude to Assoc. Prof. Dr. Robert REIGLE for widening my perspective and teaching me the foundations of ethnomusicology. I also would like to mention Prof. Şehvar BEŞİROĞLU, whose warm heart we will always remember. For intellectual and friendly supports, I would like to thank my thesis advisor Assoc.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis Report Spsisc
    SOCIAL PROTECTION AND SOCIAL INCLUSION IN ARMENIA , AZERBAIJAN AND GEORGIA SYNTHESIS REPORT European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Manuscript completed in 2011 European Commission Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission may be held responsible for the use that may be made of the information contained in this publication. Gesellschaft für Versicherungswissenschaft und –gestaltung e.V. Hansaring 43, D -50670 Köln www.gvg.org Authors: Birgit Garbe-Emden Sabine Horstmann Yvette Shajanian Zarneh © European Union, 2011 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. 2 Table of Contents Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 5 1 Main factors influencing social protection and welfare ............................................................ 9 1.1 Economic trends...................................................................................................................... 9 Macroeconomic development.......................................................................................................... 9 Fiscal policies and state revenues ................................................................................................ 10 Inequalities and remittances.......................................................................................................... 10 Territorial disparities .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report No 125 Armenia Social Transition Program Final Report
    REPORT NO 125 ARMENIA SOCIAL TRANSITION PROGRAM FINAL REPORT 20 November 2005 ARMENIA SOCIAL TRANSITION PROGRAM FINAL REPORT 2 ARMENIA SOCIAL TRANSITION PROGRAM FINAL REPORT The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. ARMENIA SOCIAL TRANSITION PROGRAM FINAL REPORT 3 CONTENTS ASTP FINAL REPORT: 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................ 7 1.1. AN OVERVIEW OF THE ARMENIA SOCIAL TRANSITION PROGRAM..................................................... 7 1.2. IMPACTS OF THE ARMENIAN SOCIAL TRANSITION PROGRAM............................................................ 7 1.3. MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS LINKED TO ASTP ACTIVITIES...................................................................... 8 1.4. PROCESS AND SCOPE OF ASTP ......................................................................................................... 10 1.5. OUTLINE OF THIS REPORT................................................................................................................. 11 ASTP FINAL REPORT: 2. SOCIAL SECURITY CARDS...................................................................... 13 2.1. OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................................ 13 2.2. SYSTEM DESIGN................................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Barnes Review July/August 2011
    ANALYZING A MASSIVE MEGALITHIC MYSTERY Armenian Stonehenge Confounds Scholars SPRAWLING OVER MORE THAN 17 ACRES ATOP A ROCKY PROMONTORY overlooking the arid, sparsely populated landscape of southern Armenia is the very ancient site known as Karahunj. Hundreds of con - figured stones towering six to nine feet tall have been thrust into the flinty earth. Forming an immense, oval configuration, they average 10 tons apiece; but the largest of their number is five times heavier. All were excavated from basalt quarries several miles away. BY FRANK JOSEPH Iron Age“ (about 1500 B.C. to 700 B.C.), and may have served “as a place of refuge in times of war,” possibly from the uriously, 84 of the 223 monoliths at Karahunj, Ar - Hellenistic period to Rome’s Late Imperial Era, circa 300 B.C. menia, feature a cleanly carved, 1.9- to 2.7-inch di - to A.D. 300. 1 As such, the place was interesting, but nothing ameter hole drilled with modern-day industrial out of the ordinary. While their assessment was correct, it Cprecision at about eye level (circa five feet, eight would prove to be far from complete or comprehensive. inches from the ground). A short wall of rocks mixed with In 1994, shortly before the Germans arrived, lingering compacted loam has been packed around the base of each conjecture regarding possible celestial alignments at Kara- massive stone, heavily eroded by millennia of wind and rain. hunj prompted other investigators to reconsider the site in This stark and lonely place near the Vorotan River lies not terms of archeoastronomy.
    [Show full text]