DOCSLIB.ORG

Interna Onal Organiza on for Migra On

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interna Onal Organiza on for Migra On Internaonal Organizaon for Migraon International Organization for Ministry of Justice of the European Union Migration Republic of Armenia ANALYSIS OF ARMENIAN MIGRATION LEGISLATION AND PRACTICE AS COMPARED TO EU STANDARDS International Organization for Migration (IOM) 2013 1 UDC 341.215.43 The Analysis of Armenian Migration Legislation and Practice as Compared to EU Standards was conducted within the framework of the Project “Strengthening Evidence-Based Management of Labour Migration in Armenia” funded by the European Union and the IOM Development Fund. Expert Team: Mária Temesvári, Christina Vasala Kokkinaki Prepared for publication by IOM Project Development and Implementation Unit in Armenia. While IOM endeavours to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the content of this Review, the views, findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of IOM and its Member States.IOM does not accept any liability for any loss, which may arise from the reliance on information contained in this paper. © Copyright: All rights reserved.No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means of electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior without the prior written permission of the publisher. Publisher: ISBN 978-9939-50-247-2 2 Contents FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................................. 6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................ 8 A. BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................................. 9 B. SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................ 9 IV. OVERVIEW OF THE ARMENIAN INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK .............................................................. 35 V.OVERVIEW OF EU-ARMENIA RELATIONS ON MIGRATION ISSUES ........................................................... 37 1.Travel Documents .......................................................................................................................................... 41 1.1 EU Acquis ................................................................................................................................................ 41 1.2 Legal framework in Armenia .................................................................................................................. 43 1.3 Gap analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 45 1.4 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 46 2. VISAS ............................................................................................................................................................. 47 2.1.EU Acquis ................................................................................................................................................ 47 2.2 Armenian legal framework ..................................................................................................................... 51 2.3 Gap analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 57 2.4 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 60 3. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF ENTRY AND BORDER CONTROL ......................................................................... 63 3.1. EU Acquis ............................................................................................................................................... 63 3.2 Armenian legal framework ..................................................................................................................... 66 3.3 Gap analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 71 3.4 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 72 4.1. EU acquis ............................................................................................................................................... 74 4.2. Armenian legal framework .................................................................................................................... 78 4.3 Gap Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 80 4.4 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 82 5.1. EU acquis ............................................................................................................................................... 83 5.2. Armenian legal framework .................................................................................................................... 89 5.3 Gap Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 90 5.4 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 91 6. STUDY AND RESEARCH ................................................................................................................................. 93 6.1 EU acquis ................................................................................................................................................ 93 6.2 Armenian legal framework ..................................................................................................................... 98 6.3 Gap Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 99 6.4 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 101 7. FAMILY AND MARRIAGE ............................................................................................................................... 103 7.1. EU acquis ............................................................................................................................................... 103 3 7.2 Armenian legal framework ..................................................................................................................... 108 7.3 Gap Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 111 7.4 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 113 8. MIGRANTS’RIGHTS AND NON-DISCRIMINATION ......................................................................................... 114 8.1 EU acquis ................................................................................................................................................ 114 8.2 Armenian legal framework ..................................................................................................................... 118 8.3 Gap analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 122 8.4 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 123 9. INTEGRATION ............................................................................................................................................... 126 9.1. EU acquis ............................................................................................................................................... 126 9.2. Armenian legal framework .................................................................................................................... 127 9.3. Gap Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 127 9.4. Recommendations ................................................................................................................................. 127 10. ASYLUM ...................................................................................................................................................... 129 10.1. EU acquis ............................................................................................................................................. 129 10.2. Armenian legal framework .................................................................................................................. 137 10.3. Gap Analysis ........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • To the Armenian Information Technology Companies To
    MINISTRY OF ECONOMY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA GUIDEGUIDE TOTO THETHE ARMENIANARMENIAN INFORMATIONINFORMATION TECHNOLOGYTECHNOLOGY COMPANIESCOMPANIES 2010 GUIDE TO THE ARMENIAN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES © 2004 ‐ 2010 Enterprise Incubator Foundation 2 124 Hovsep Emin Street, Yerevan 0051, Armenia Phone: +374 10 219 797 Fax: +374 10 219 777 E‐mail: [email protected] http://www.eif‐it.com All rights reserved This Guide may be freely copied and distributed as long as the original copyright is displayed and no modifications are made to its content. Copies of the Guide are available for download from http://www.eif‐ it.com. All respective trademarks, brands, and names are the property of their respective owners. Enterprise Incubator Foundation does not guar‐ antee the accuracy of the data and information included in this publica‐ tion. This Guide was supported by the Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Armenia, (http://www.mineconomy.am) and USAID/Armenia Mis‐ sion (http://armenia.usaid.gov/). The publication of this Guide has been made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. 3 The concept of this Guide was initiated by Enterprise Incubator Founda‐ tion, a business development and incubation agency supporting tech‐ nology companies in Armenia. The objectives of the Guide stem from and parallel the mission of Enterprise Incubator, which is to foster eco‐ nomic growth in Armenia by assisting IT companies in areas of business development and management, skills development and training, and start‐up formation and entrepreneurship.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe and Central Asia
    EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA 301 INCSR 2006 Volume I 302 Europe and Central Asia Albania I. Summary Albania is used by organized crime groups as a transit country for heroin from Central Asia destined for Western Europe. Seizures of heroin by Albanian, Greek, and Italian authorities declined significantly in 2005, suggesting a possible change in trafficking patterns. Cannabis is also produced in Albania for markets in Europe. The Government of Albania (GoA), largely in response to international pressure and with international assistance, is confronting criminal elements more aggressively but is hampered by a lack of resources and endemic corruption. The new government led by Prime Minister Sali Berisha, in power since September 2005, has stated that fighting corruption, organized crime, and trafficking of persons and drugs is its highest priority. Albania is a party to the 1988 UN Drug Convention. II. Status of Country Although Albania is not a major transit country for drugs coming into the United States, it remains a country of concern to the U.S., as Albania’s ports on the Adriatic and porous land borders, together with poorly financed and under-equipped border and customs controls, make Albania an attractive stop on the smuggling route for traffickers moving shipments into Western Europe. In addition, marijuana is produced domestically for markets in Europe, the largest being Italy and Greece. III. Country Actions Against Drugs in 2005 Policy Initiatives. In 2005, the asset forfeiture law, a key tool in the fight against organized crime, began to be successfully implemented, with the filing of eight asset forfeiture cases and the creation of the Agency for the Administration of Sequestered and Confiscated Assets.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED NATIONS COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE 59 Session 7 November to 7 December 2016 PARTNERSHIP for OPEN SOCIETY INITIATIVE's J
    UNITED NATIONS COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE 59th Session 7 November to 7 December 2016 PARTNERSHIP FOR OPEN SOCIETY INITIATIVE’S JOINT SUBMISSION TO THE COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE ON THE FOURTH PERIODIC REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA REGARDING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE AND OTHER CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OF PUNISHMENT October 17, 2016, Yerevan, Armenia Hereby, the Partnership for Open Society Initiative,1 representing more than 60 civil society organizations, presents a joint submission prepared by the following civil society organizations, public monitoring groups, human rights lawyers and attorneys: 1. Coalition to Stop Violence Against Women; 2. Center for Rights Development NGO; 3. Committee to Protect Freedom of Expression; 4. Foundation Against the Violation of Law NGO; 5. Helsinki Citizens’ Assembly–Vanadzor; 6. Helsinki Committee of Armenia Human Rights Defender NGO; 7. Journalists' Club Asparez; 8. Open Society Foundations – Armenia; 9. Protection of Rights without Borders NGO; 10. Rule of Law Human Rights NGO; 11. Group of Public Monitors Implementing Supervision over the Criminal-Executive Institutions and Bodies of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Armenia; 12. Public Monitoring Group at the Detention Facilities of the Police of the Republic of Armenia; 13. Davit Khachaturyan, Justice Group, Open Society-Foundations-Armenia, Expert, Ph.D; 14. Inessa Petrosyan, Attorney; 15. Tigran Hayrapetyan, Attorney; 16. Tigran Safaryan, Attorney; 17. Vahe Grigoryan, Attorney, Legal Consultant at EHRAC (Middlesex University). Contacts Persons David Amiryan Karine Ghazaryan Open Society Foundations-Armenia Open Society Foundations-Armenia Deputy Director for Programs Civil Society Program Coordinator E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] 1 http://www.partnership.am/en/index 1 Contents INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia, Republic of | Grove
    Grove Art Online Armenia, Republic of [Hayasdan; Hayq; anc. Pers. Armina] Lucy Der Manuelian, Armen Zarian, Vrej Nersessian, Nonna S. Stepanyan, Murray L. Eiland and Dickran Kouymjian https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T004089 Published online: 2003 updated bibliography, 26 May 2010 Country in the southern part of the Transcaucasian region; its capital is Erevan. Present-day Armenia is bounded by Georgia to the north, Iran to the south-east, Azerbaijan to the east and Turkey to the west. From 1920 to 1991 Armenia was a Soviet Socialist Republic within the USSR, but historically its land encompassed a much greater area including parts of all present-day bordering countries (see fig.). At its greatest extent it occupied the plateau covering most of what is now central and eastern Turkey (c. 300,000 sq. km) bounded on the north by the Pontic Range and on the south by the Taurus and Kurdistan mountains. During the 11th century another Armenian state was formed to the west of Historic Armenia on the Cilician plain in south-east Asia Minor, bounded by the Taurus Mountains on the west and the Amanus (Nur) Mountains on the east. Its strategic location between East and West made Historic or Greater Armenia an important country to control, and for centuries it was a battlefield in the struggle for power between surrounding empires. Periods of domination and division have alternated with centuries of independence, during which the country was divided into one or more kingdoms. Page 1 of 47 PRINTED FROM Oxford Art Online. © Oxford University Press, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • First Capitals of Armenia and Georgia: Armawir and Armazi (Problems of Early Ethnic Associations)
    First Capitals of Armenia and Georgia: Armawir and Armazi (Problems of Early Ethnic Associations) Armen Petrosyan Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Yerevan The foundation legends of the first capitals of Armenia and Georgia – Armawir and Armazi – have several common features. A specific cult of the moon god is attested in both cities in the triadic temples along with the supreme thunder god and the sun god. The names of Armawir and Armazi may be associated with the Anatolian Arma- ‘moon (god).’ The Armenian ethnonym (exonym) Armen may also be derived from the same stem. The sacred character of cultic localities is extremely enduring. The cults were changed, but the localities kept their sacred character for millennia. At the transition to a new religious system the new cults were often simply imposed on the old ones (e.g., the old temple was renamed after a new deity, or the new temple was built on the site or near the ruins of the old one). The new deities inherited the characteristics of the old ones, or, one may say, the old cults were simply renamed, which could have been accompanied by some changes of the cult practices. Evidently, in the new system more or less comparable images were chosen to replace the old ones: similarity of functions, rituals, names, concurrence of days of cult, etc (Petrosyan 2006: 4 f.; Petrosyan 2007a: 175).1 On the other hand, in the course of religious changes, old gods often descend to the lower level of epic heroes. Thus, the heroes of the Armenian ethnogonic legends and the epic “Daredevils of Sasun” are derived from ancient local gods: e.g., Sanasar, who obtains the 1For numerous examples of preservation of pre-Urartian and Urartian holy places in medieval Armenia, see, e.g., Hmayakyan and Sanamyan 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • A Stability Pact for the Caucasus in Theory and Practice
    CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES WORKING DOCUMENT NO. 152 SEPTEMBER 2000 A STABILITY PACT FOR THE CAUCASUS IN THEORY AND PRACTICE - A SUPPLEMENTARY NOTE MICHAEL EMERSON NATHALIE TOCCI AND ELENA PROKHOROVA CEPS Working Documents are published to give an early indication of the work in progress within CEPS research programmes and to stimulate reactions from other experts in the field. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed are attributable only to the authors in a personal capacity and not to any institution with which they are associated. ISBN 92-9079-309-0 © Copyright 2000, Michael Emerson, Nathalie Tocci and Elena Prokhorova A Stability Pact for the Caucasus in Theory and Practice - A Supplementary Note CEPS Working Document No. 152, November 2000 Michael Emerson, Nathalie Tocci & Elena Prokhorova* Abstract In response to appeals of the leaders of the South Caucasus for a Stability Pact for the region, CEPS published in May 2000 a consultative document with a comprehensive proposal (available on www.ceps.be). Subsequently the authors have held extensive consultations with the leaders in all three states of the South Caucasus, and in four of the key autonomies (Nagorno Karabakh, Abkhazia, Adjaria, Ossetia). The present paper draws together the information and ideas collected during these consultations, although the conclusions are only attributable to the authors. The main argument of the original document is maintained, and strengthened with more precise views on how the conflicts might be solved within the framework of a Stability Pact. However the proposed Stability Pact process could be more than just an approach to conflict resolution. It has systemic or even constitutional aspects, with elements to overcome the transitional problems of the weak state and ease the confrontations of traditional notions such as independence versus territorial integrity, or the choice between federation and confederation, which are part of the present impasse.
    [Show full text]
  • The Treaty of Sevres As the Legal Basis for the Western Armenia’S Territorial Claims to Turkey ***
    Правова система України й міжнародне право, порівняльне правознавство DOI : 10.36695/2219-5521.2.2019.38 УДК 341.01 O.M. POlivAnOvA , A.A. AbrAAMiAn Olena Mykolayivna Polivanova , Ph .D. in Law, Asso - ciate professor of Kyiv University of Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine * ORCID : 0000-0002-5670-8900 Anna Aramivna Abraamian , master student of Kyiv University of Law of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine ** THE TREATY OF SEVRES AS THE LEGAL BASIS FOR THE WESTERN ARMENIA’S TERRITORIAL CLAIMS TO TURKEY *** Problem statement . History of the Armenian statehood has more than a few thousands of years and it may even be regarded as the oldest in the history of human civilization 1. Armenian statehood took different forms: from Azzi-Hayasa confederation (1500 – 1290 BC) to the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia, also known as the Cilician Armenia, Lesser Armenia, or New Armenia 2 (1198–1375). Sources vary on when Armenian statehood was lost. Some scientists suggest that its loss may be dated to 1375 when the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia was ceased to exist 3. Others state it was lost in 1045 with the fall of Bagratid Armenia, because Cilician Armenia was outside of the traditional Armenian homeland, while Bagratid Armenia was the last major Armenian state in the Armenian Highlands 4. Nevertheless, since the loss of Armenian statehood at that time, the First Armenian Republic (the Armenian National Council declared the independence of Armenia on 28 May 1918), officially known at the time of its existence as the Democratic Republic of Armenia, was the first mod - ern Armenian state.
    [Show full text]
  • Ed Nations A/HRC/16/47/Add.3
    United Nations A/HRC/16/47/Add.3 General Assembly Distr.: General 17 February 2011 Original: English Human Rights Council Sixteenth session Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development Report of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Addendum Mission to Armenia* ** Summary The Working Group conducted a country mission to Armenia between 6 and 15 September 2010, at the invitation of the Government. During the visit, the Working Group held meetings with various authorities of the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the State. It also had the opportunity to meet with detainees, prisoners, representatives of the civil society and the United Nations agencies. The Working Group visited 14 detention facilities, including prisons with convicted and pretrial detainees; police stations and police detention centres; an immigration reception centre; psychiatric hospitals; and facilities for women and juveniles. The facilities visited were located in Yerevan, Aboviyan, Artik, Goris, Sevan and Vanadzor. Three unannounced visits were also made to police stations in Aparan, Goris and Sevan. The Working Group was able to privately interview 153 detainees chosen mostly at random. The report describes the institutional and legislative framework with respect to deprivation of liberty and human rights in Armenia, since its independence in 1991. It refers to important legislative reforms made in recent years that are conducive to creating better standards of human rights for persons who are deprived of their liberty. It also provides a brief outline of the criminal justice system to elaborate on the context in which deprivation of liberty exists.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Traditional Black Youths: the Earliest Sources1
    Armenian Traditional Black Youths: the 1 Earliest Sources Armen Petrosyan Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Yerevan, Armenia [email protected] In this article it is argued that the traditional figure of the Armenian folklore “black youth” is derived from the members of the war-band of the thunder god, mythological counterparts of the archaic war-bands of youths. The blackness of the youths is associated with igneous initiatory rituals. The best parallels of the Armenian heroes are found in Greece, India, and especially in Ossetia and other Caucasian traditions, where the Indo-European (particularly Alanian-Ossetian) influence is significant. In several medieval Armenian songs young heroes are referred to as t‘ux manuks ‘black youths,’ t‘ux ktriçs ‘black braves,’ or simply t‘uxs ‘blacks’ (see Mnatsakanyan 1976, which remains the best and comprehensive work on these figures, and Harutyunyan and Kalantaryan 2001, where several articles pertaining to this theme are published). Also, T‘ux manuk is the appellation of numerous ruined pilgrimage sanctuaries. A. Mnatsakanyan, the first investigator of these traditional figures, considered them in connection with the fratries of youths, whose remnants survived until medieval times (Mnatsakanyan 1976: 193 ff.).2 The study of the t‘ux manuks should be based on revelation of their specific characteristics and comparison with similar figures of other traditions. In this respect, the study of the T‘ux manuk sanctuaries and their legends 1This article represents an abridged and updated version of Petrosyan 2001. 2In Armenian folklore the figures of similar names – t‘uxs (‘blacks’) and alek manuks (‘good youths’) – figure as evil spirits (Alishan 1895: 205, 217).
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in Armenia, Practical Law Country Q&A 8-638-0858 (2018)
    Doing Business in Armenia, Practical Law Country Q&A 8-638-0858 (2018) Doing Business in Armenia by Sedrak Asatryan, Aram Orbelyan, Janna Simonyan, Narine Beglaryan, Roustam Badasyan, Senior Associate and Ani Varderesyan, Concern Dialog Country Q&A | Law stated as at 01-May-2018 | Armenia A Q&A guide to doing business in Armenia. This Q&A gives an overview of key recent developments affecting doing business in Armenia as well as an introduction to the legal system; foreign investment, including restrictions, currency regulations and incentives; and business vehicles and their relevant restrictions and liabilities. The article also summarises the laws regulating employment relationships, including redundancies and mass layoffs, and provides short overviews on competition law; data protection; and product liability and safety. In addition, there are comprehensive summaries on taxation and tax residency; and intellectual property rights over patents, trade marks, registered and unregistered designs. This article is part of the global guide to doing business worldwide. For a full list of contents, please visit www.practicallaw.com/ dbi-guide. Overview 1. What are the key recent developments affecting doing business in your jurisdiction? With the inauguration of Armenia’s new president, the Constitution, as amended in 2015, has fully entered into force. Therefore, Armenia currently operates under a parliamentary system of government. The RA Tax Code, which was adopted in 2016, has replaced a number of separate laws regulating different types of taxes. It partially entered into force in 2017 and since the beginning of 2018 has been fully in force in Armenia. The New Civil Procedure Code of 2018 has recently entered into force.
    [Show full text]
  • O&M Volume 1
    OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 President's Budget March 2019 Volume 1 Part 2 of 2 Justification for FY 2020 United States Court for the Armed Forces Cooperative Threat Reduction Program Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster and Civic Aid Office of the Inspector General Support for International Sporting Competitions Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) Operation and Maintenance, Defense-Wide (This page intentionally left blank) Office of the Secretary of Defense Other Defense-Wide Base Programs Overseas Contingency Operations Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 President’s Budget TABLE OF CONTENTS Other Defense-Wide Baseline Programs CAAF United States Court for the Armed Forces .................................................3 CTR Cooperative Threat Reduction Program ....................................................13 DAWDF Department of Defense Acquisition Workforce Development Fund ............................67 OHDACA Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid ..........................................81 OIG Office of Inspector General .............................................................93 SISC Support for International Sporting Competitions ........................................127 Overseas Contingency Operations Requests OCO Summary by Operation/Funding Category .........................................................135 O-1 O-1 Line Item Summary ..................................................................137 DCAA Defense Contract Audit Agency ..........................................................139
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Services and Their Role in Poverty Alleviation in Armenia - a Case Study of Karaberd Gold Mine
    UNDP/UNEP “Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services” Technical Assistance Project The report is prepared for United Nations Development Programme in Armenia within the frame of the project “Economic Valuation of ecosystem Services in Armenia”. The project is funded under umbrella of United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) joint global Poverty and Environment Initiative (PEI) and aims to contribute to poverty reduction and improved well-being of poor and vulnerable groups through mainstreaming the environment into national development processes Ecosystem Services and their Role in Poverty Alleviation in Armenia - A Case Study of Karaberd Gold Mine Final Report February 2014 This report has been developed in the scope of UNDP/UNEP join joint TA Project “Economic Valuation of ecosystem Services in Armenia” Implementing agency UNDP UNDP EG Portfolio Analyst Armen Marirosyan UNDP Programme Policy Adviser, EG portfolio, Project Georgi Arzumanyan coordinator UNDP Project Assistant Kristina Tereshchatova Project team: Project international consultant Camille Bann Project task leader Anastas Aghazaryan Project experts Davit Androyan Vram Tevosyan Lothar Guendling Georgi Fayvush Hrant Avetisyan Armen Amiryan Aida Tarloyan Armen Ghazaryan Arman Kandaryan Mikayel Avagyan Address: 14 Petros Adamyan str., 0010 Yerevan, Armenia UNDP Armenia Tel: (374 60) 530000; Fax: (+374 10) 543811 Web Site: http://www.am.undp.org E-mail: [email protected] 2 List of abbreviations EIE Environmental Impact Expertise
    [Show full text]