DOCSLIB.ORG

Law and Politics in the South China Sea

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Law and Politics in the South China Sea University of Alberta Law and Politics in the South China Sea Assessing the Role of UNCLOS in Ocean Dispute Settlement by Nong Hong A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science ©Nong Hong Spring 2010 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-60561-5 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-60561-5 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L’auteur conserve la propriété du droit d’auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. without the author’s permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformément à la loi canadienne sur la Privacy Act some supporting forms protection de la vie privée, quelques may have been removed from this formulaires secondaires ont été enlevés de thesis. cette thèse. While these forms may be included Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans in the document page count, their la pagination, il n’y aura aucun contenu removal does not represent any loss manquant. of content from the thesis. Examining Committee Wenran Jiang, Political Science Lois Harder, Political Science Tom Keating, Political Science Andy Knight, Political Science Greg Anderson, Political Science Yingfeng Xu, Economics Ian Townsend-Gault, Faculty of Law, University of British Columbia Law and Politics in the South China Sea Assessing the role of UNCLOS in Ocean Dispute Settlement NONG HONG Abstract This dissertation evaluates the applicability and effectiveness of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) as a settlement mechanism for addressing the South China Sea (SCS) dispute, the most complex and challenging ocean-related regional conflict in East Asia. This dissertation answers these broad questions: Does UNCLOS create a constitution for the ocean? Is UNCLOS successful in preventing or managing conflicts pertaining to marine resources? Hoes does the SCS dispute settlement bridge the gap of International Relations (IR) and International Law (IL)? Since 1980s, the regime concept came to be used as one vehicle to cross the disciplinary divide between IL and IR. This dissertation seeks to foster dialogue between political scientists and international lawyers by viewing UNCLOS as an international regime and exploring its internal coherence and its external relationship with other international regimes and institutions in this region. I argue that there can be little doubt about the centrality of UNCLOS in the legal framework for ocean management, albeit it may be perceived to have certain shortcomings. The most pervasive threats to the SCS stability and obstacles to solve the dispute are caused by the lack of political will to implement the dispute settlement mechanism of UNCLOS. This paper proposes a pragmatic settlement regime of five dimensions to solve the SCS dispute and accelerate ocean governance in this region. Acknowledgement Any degree is a journey, which will not lead us to the destination without the support and advice of a broad range of persons and institutions. While sincerely apologizing to those whom I have inadvertently overlooked, I take this opportunity to express my sincere gratitude for the following persons and organizations. I am very appreciative of my supervisor, Professor Wenran Jiang for his great support and guidance over the years. I am also grateful to the doctoral committee, Professor Tom Keating, who provided critical support and guidance throughout the development and execution of the study, Professor Andy Knight who always supports and leads me in the vast field of ocean governance, Dr. Greg Anderson who provided important spiritual input in the early stages of this research, Dr. Xu Yingfeng who challenges me from an economist aspect, and Professor Ian Townsend-Gault who is kind enough to serve as the external examiner. I would like to acknowledge the generous assistance provided by the Department of Political Science, and the China Institute of University of Alberta in providing funding in the school years. I am also indebted to many academics and government officials working in the field of the SCS, who have inspired and encouraged me on this path. Without mentioning each person who have helped me, my special respect goes to Dr. Wu Shicun, a well know Chinese historian on the SCS and my first professional mentor to open the door for me to access the vast academic world of the SCS, and Dr. Zou Keyuan, Harris Chair in International Law at the University of Central Lancashire, who has given me a lot of advices throughout the writing of this dissertation. I am grateful for several sources of institutional support which allowed me to complete this dissertation. These include the National Institute for the South China Sea Studies where I started my career as a young scholar in the field of the SCS; International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea where I served as an legal intern and a Nippon Fellow on the International Dispute Settlement Training Program; Center of Oceans Law and Policy, University of Virginia, Nippon Foundation, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, where I expanded my literature review and archive research as a visiting scholar; United Nations Division of Ocean and the Law of the Sea, International Foundation for the Law of the Sea, Rhodes Academy, International Ocean Institute and Dalhousie University where I enriched my knowledge on ocean laws and policies from a serials of intensive training courses. I also wish to acknowledge the people who showed me kindness and trust and who were willing to participate in my interviews and share their knowledge and expertise on the SCS and the law of the sea with me. They are Dr. Wu Shicun, president of the National Institute for the South China Sea Studies, Dr. Ralf Emmers, head of Graduate Studies at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, Dr. Jon M. Van Dyke, Professor of Law, University of Hawaii, Professor John Norton Moore and Professor Myron H. Nordquist, Director and Associate Director of Center for Oceans Law and Policy, Dr. Ramses Amer, Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Pacific Asia Studies, Stockholm University, former and current judges of ITLOS, such as David Anderson, Gudmundur Eiriksson and Gao Zhiguo. I owe my deepest gratitude to my family. My parents came all the way from a tropical island of China to Edmonton to support me during my second year of the programme and saved me from the desperately preparation for the comprehensive exams. My husband Wenbing and my sweet daughter Zhixiao stand with me all the time to support me to find the courage to follow my dream. Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................ Acknowledgement .......................................................................................................................................... List of Tables, Figures and Maps .................................................................................................................. List of Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................... Introduction: Regime Theory and UNCLOS ............................................................................................. 1 1. Regime Theory ........................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Regime Effectiveness ..............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Volunteer from America.Pdf
    1 2 A Volunteer From America By Bob Mack 1ST Signal Brigade Nha Trang, Republic of Vietnam 1967 – 1968 3 Dedicated to those that served ©2010 by Robert J. McKendrick All Rights Reserved 4 In-Country The big DC-8 banked sharply into the sun and began its descent toward the Cam Ranh peninsula, the angle of drop steeper than usual in order to frustrate enemy gunners lurking in the nearby mountains. Below, the impossibly blue South China Sea seemed crusted with diamonds. I had spent the last two months at home, thanks to a friendly personnel sergeant in Germany who’d cut my travel 5 orders to include a 60-day “delay en route” before I was due to report in at Ft. Lewis, Washington for transportation to the 22 nd Replacement Battalion, MACV (Military Assistance Command Vietnam). Now I was twenty-five hours out from Seattle, and on the verge of experiencing the Vietnam War at first hand. It was the fifth of July 1967. Vietnam stunk. Literally. After the unbelievable heat, the smell was the first thing you noticed, dank and moldy, like a basement that had repeatedly flooded and only partially dried. Or like a crypt… The staff sergeant was a character straight out of Central Casting, half full of deep South gruffness and Dixie grizzle, the other half full of shit. He paced back and forth while we stood in formation in the hot sand. “Welcome to II Corps, Republic of Vet-nam,” he said. Then he gave us the finger. “Take a good look at it, boys.
    [Show full text]
  • (1I?I - 1Iii ): the >TRATEQ10 S1GNJF8QANQE ©F Om Muu BAY TH[ and Mm
    UNIVERSITY COLLEGE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE ACADEMY BAMU BAY REVISITED (1i?i - 1iii ): THE >TRATEQ10 S1GNJF8QANQE ©F Om mUU BAY TH[ AND mm. BY CAPTAIN JUAN A. DE LEON PN (GSC) NOVEMBER 1989 A SUB-THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF DEFENCE STUDIES II PREFACF AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT Southeast Asia is a region fast becoming the center stage of the 21st Century. One historian said that "the Mediterranean is the past, Europe is the present and the Asia-Pacific Region is the future." The future is now! This sub-thesis deals with contemporary issues now determining the future of the region going into the year 2000. Soviet attention was refocused on the Asia-Pacific region after Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev made his historic speech at Vladivostock on 28 July 1986. Since then developments have gone on at a pace faster than expected. The Soviets have withdrawn from Afghanistan. Then in September 1988, Gorbachev spelled out in detail his Vladivostock initiative through his Krasnoyarsk speech and called on major powers, the US, China and Japan, to respond to his peace offensives. He has offered to give up the Soviet presence in Cam Ranh if the US did likewise at Subic and Clark in the Philippines. To some it may appear attractive, while others consider that it is like trading "a pawn for a queen". This sub-thesis completes my ten-month stay in a very progressive country, Australia. I was fortunate enough having been given the chance to undertake a Master of Defence Studies Course (MDef Studies) at the University College, University of New South Wales, Australian Defence Force Academy upon the invitation of the Australian Government.
    [Show full text]
  • China Versus Vietnam: an Analysis of the Competing Claims in the South China Sea Raul (Pete) Pedrozo
    A CNA Occasional Paper China versus Vietnam: An Analysis of the Competing Claims in the South China Sea Raul (Pete) Pedrozo With a Foreword by CNA Senior Fellow Michael McDevitt August 2014 Unlimited distribution Distribution unlimited. for public release This document contains the best opinion of the authors at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor. Cover Photo: South China Sea Claims and Agreements. Source: U.S. Department of Defense’s Annual Report on China to Congress, 2012. Distribution Distribution unlimited. Specific authority contracting number: E13PC00009. Copyright © 2014 CNA This work was created in the performance of Contract Number 2013-9114. Any copyright in this work is subject to the Government's Unlimited Rights license as defined in FAR 52-227.14. The reproduction of this work for commercial purposes is strictly prohibited. Nongovernmental users may copy and distribute this document in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially, provided that this copyright notice is reproduced in all copies. Nongovernmental users may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the reading or further copying of the copies they make or distribute. Nongovernmental users may not accept compensation of any manner in exchange for copies. All other rights reserved. This project was made possible by a generous grant from the Smith Richardson Foundation Approved by: August 2014 Ken E. Gause, Director International Affairs Group Center for Strategic Studies Copyright © 2014 CNA FOREWORD This legal analysis was commissioned as part of a project entitled, “U.S. policy options in the South China Sea.” The objective in asking experienced U.S international lawyers, such as Captain Raul “Pete” Pedrozo, USN, Judge Advocate Corps (ret.),1 the author of this analysis, is to provide U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysia's Claims and Positions Over Maritime Features in the South
    Malaysia’s Claims and Positions over Maritime Features In the South China Sea Jalila Abdul Jalil, Senior Researcher, MIMA 10th South China Sea Conference Cooperation for Regional Security and Development Da Nang City, Viet Nam Thursday, 8 November1 2018 Disclaimer The information contained in this presentation reflects the personal views of the presenter 2 Outline of Presentation • Introduction • Malaysia’s claims in the South China Sea • Malaysia’s position in the South China Sea • Extended continental shelf claim in the Defined Area in the South China Sea • Lessons from Philippines Arbitration relating to Malaysia’s Claim in the South China: Possible Consideration 3 Malaysia’s Claims in the South China Sea 4 Map showing the aerial view of the South China Sea Source: Malaysia Airport Berhad 6 Source: Forbes and Basiron, (2008) Malaysia’s Maritime Realm Atlas • This map shows in general the overlapping claims in the South China Sea Map of the Competing Claims of the South China Sea by Arsana and Schofield, 2012 from Agora: South China Sea (2013), Vol. 107:95, American Journal of International Law (AJIL) . 8 Malaysia’s claims in the South China Sea • Malaysia’s claim are encapsulated in Malaysia’s Peta Baru 1979. • The Map was drawn based on the 1958 Geneva Convention, bilateral treaties and customary international law • Malaysia’s claim is based on the fact that the features are part of its continental shelf and thus entitles Malaysia to an extended continental shelf based on the natural prolongation of the continental shelf. • Malaysia can claims the respective maritime zones namely territorial sea, EEZ and continental shelf.
    [Show full text]
  • The South China Sea Arbitration Case Filed by the Philippines Against China: Arguments Concerning Low Tide Elevations, Rocks, and Islands
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Xiamen University Institutional Repository 322 China Oceans Law Review (Vol. 2015 No. 1) The South China Sea Arbitration Case Filed by the Philippines against China: Arguments concerning Low Tide Elevations, Rocks, and Islands Yann-huei SONG* Abstract: On March 30, 2014, the Philippines submitted its Memorial to the Arbitral Tribunal, which presents the country’s case on the jurisdiction of the Tribunal and the merits of its claims. In the Memorial, the Philippines argues that Mischief Reef, Second Thomas Shoal, Subi Reef, Gaven Reef, McKennan Reef, Hughes Reef are low-tide elevations, and that Scarborough Shoal, Johnson Reef, Cuarteron Reef, and Fiery Cross Reef are “rocks”, therefore these land features cannot generate entitlement to a 200-nautical-mile EEZ or continental shelf. This paper discusses if the claims made by the Philippines are well founded in fact and law. It concludes that it would be difficult for the Tribunal to rule in favor of the Philippines’ claims. Key Words: Arbitration; South China Sea; China; The Philippines; Low tide elevation; Island; Rock; UNCLOS I. Introduction On January 22, 2013, the Republic of the Philippines (hereinafter “the Philippines”) initiated arbitral proceedings against the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter “China” or “PRC”) when it presented a Note Verbale1 to the Chinese * Yann-huie Song, Professor, Institute of Marine Affairs, College of Marine Sciences, Sun- yet Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan and Research Fellow, Institute of European and American Studies, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. E-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • LAOS: George Mcmurtrie Godley III, the Man Who Loves Bombs
    7 Days 16 February I972 N THE UNBUILT PANTHEON to the warlords of the IAmerican adventure in Indo­ china, an appropriately roomy LAOS: niche should be reserved for G. (for George) McMurtrie Godley III, Richard Nixon’s proconsul to the lacerated little kingdom of George McMurtrie Godley III, Laos. Just as only nineteenth-century Britain could have produced the charge of the Light Brigade, so it is inconceiv­ The Man who Loves Bombs able that “Mac” Godley, or the “viceroy” as he is often called here, could spring from anything except the by T. D. Allman bedrock of twentieth-century American supposedly neutral Laotian territory for electric generators — Godley proudly imperium. Godley - middle fifties, over operations in Cambodia, and once told diplomatic colleagues that his six feet tall and 200 pounds around, summed up his approach to the Laotian dinner table sat even more than the booming voice, insatiable appetite for problem by telling a group of visitors French ambassador’s, and invited them food, wine, power and war - manages that “the only good communist is one in for Beluga caviar to prove it. More to combine the quintessentially six feet under the ground.” recently, Godley boasted across a diplo­ American traits of Theodore Rossevelet Godley’s style of public service matic dinner table of buying several on safari, Doctor Strangelove in his assumed its defining form in the mid- score crates of a rare vintage of Chateau B-52, and the Eagle on the Great Seal of 1960s, when he served as U.S. ambas­ Lafite Rothschild. “It would all be the United States glaring down on the sador to the Congo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spratly Islands Administered by the Individual States of the Region and the Boundaries of Claims Versus the Exclusive Econom
    The Spratly Islands administered by the individual states of the region and the boundaries of claims versus the exclusive economic zones and the boundaries of the continental shelf 0 25 50 75 100 km 0 25 50 75 100 NM 2009 VIETNAM 1974 Northeast Cay Southwest Cay Block Claim Vietnam Petroleum South Reef West York Island Thitu Island Subi Reef Irving Reef Flat Island Loaita Cay Nanshan Island Lankiam Cay Loaita Island a e Centre Cay Petley Reef S Itu Aba Island Sand Cay Gaven Reef a Namyit Island n i Discovery Great Reef 1979 Hughes Reef Mischief Reef h Sin Cowe Island C (Union Banks) Grierson Reef Collins Reef Higgens Reef Second Lansdowne Reef Thomas Shoal h Johnson South Reef t u Fiery Cross Reef First o Bombay Castle S Thomas Shoal 2009 2009 (London Reefs) PHILIPPINES Central Reef Pearson Reef Pigeon Reef 1979 West Reef Cuarteron Reef East Reef Alison Reef Ladd Reef Cornwallis South Reef Spratly Island Commodore Reef Prince of Wales Bank Barque Canada Reef Erica Reef Investigator Shoal Alexandra Bank Mariveles Reef Prince Consort Bank Amboyna Cay Grainger Bank Rifleman Bank Ardasier Reef Vanguard Bank Swallow Reef 1979 1979 The boundaries of the claims in the South China Sea have not been precisely delimited. This is their approximate location, presented for illustrative purposes only. for illustrative location, presented delimited. This is their approximate precisely not been Sea have the claims in the South China The boundaries of : MALAYSIA © / Reservation LEGEND Areas of land (islands, cays, reefs, rocks): Submerged areas and areas only partly above water: Boundaries of claims submitted by: Boundaries of the exclusive economic zones delimited pursuant to the ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague issued in 2016 (case number 2013–19) and in line with the UNCLOS, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Drummond, Robert OH857
    Wisconsin Veterans Museum Research Center Transcript of an Oral History Interview with ROBERT DRUMMOND Transportation and Maintenance, Army, Vietnam War. 2006 OH 857 1 OH 857 Drummond, Robert, (1947- ). Oral History Interview, 2006. User Copy: 1 sound cassette (ca. 47 min.), analog, 1 7/8 ips, mono. Master Copy: 1 sound cassette (ca. 47 min.), analog, 1 7/8 ips, mono. Transcript: 0.1 linear ft. (1 folder). Military Papers: 0.1 linear ft. (1 folder). Abstract: Robert Drummond, a Chicago, Illinois native, discusses his Vietnam War service with the 264 th Transportation Company. Drummond discusses dropping out of high school, his motivations for enlisting in the Army, and the reactions of his family and friends. Sent to basic training at Fort Polk (Louisiana), he mentions disliking the snakes and states bulls and cows were allowed to wander camp. He speaks of being sent to pole climbing school for a week before being reassigned as a stevedore in the newly-formed 264 th Transportation Company at Fort Eustis (Virginia). Drummond describes flying overseas on a C-130 and arriving in Cam Ranh Bay (Vietnam). At Cam Ranh, he discusses the routine of loading and unloading ships out on the water, military life, an unloading mishap, and the types of cargo he handled. Drummond states, “It wasn't like a part of Vietnam, you know. It was just like being here in the stateside.” He describes participating in Operation Oregon: setting up an ammunition dump on the beach at Duc Pho, standing watches in his camp, and hearing battleship artillery rounds pass overhead.
    [Show full text]
  • (MSC) Public Comment Draft Report SFSAG Rockall Haddock on Behalf
    MSC Full Assessment Reporting Template FCR v2.0 (16 th March 2015) MEC V1.1 (2nd October 2017) Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Public Comment Draft Report SFSAG Rockall haddock On behalf of Scottish Fisheries Sustainable Accreditation Group (SFSAG) Prepared by ME Certification Ltd May 2018 Authors: Dr Hugh Jones Dr Robin Cook Dr Jo Gascoigne Dr Geir Hønneland ME Certification Ltd 56 High Street, Lymington Hampshire SO41 9AH United Kingdom Tel: 01590 613007 Fax: 01590 671573 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.me-cert.com MSC Full Assessment Reporting Template FCR v2.0 (16 th March 2015) MEC V1.1 (2nd October 2017) Contents GLOSSARY ............................................................................................................................. 3 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 6 2 AUTHORSHIP AND PEER REVIEWERS ................................................................................ 8 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE FISHERY ....................................................................................... 10 3.1 Unit(s) of Assessment (UoA) and Scope of Certification Sought ........................... 10 3.1.1 UoA and Proposed Unit of Certification (UoC) .............................................................. 10 3.1.2 Final UoC(s) .................................................................................................................. 11 3.1.3 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and Catch Data ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysia and Brunei: an Analysis of Their Claims in the South China Sea J
    A CNA Occasional Paper Malaysia and Brunei: An Analysis of their Claims in the South China Sea J. Ashley Roach With a Foreword by CNA Senior Fellow Michael McDevitt August 2014 Unlimited distribution Cleared for public release This document contains the best opinion of the authors at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor. Cover Photo: South China Sea Claims and Agreements. Source: U.S. Department of Defense’s Annual Report on China to Congress, 2012. Distribution Distribution unlimited. Specific authority contracting number: E13PC00009. Copyright © 2014 CNA This work was created in the performance of Contract Number 2013-9114. Any copyright in this work is subject to the Government's Unlimited Rights license as defined in FAR 52-227.14. The reproduction of this work for commercial purposes is strictly prohibited. Nongovernmental users may copy and distribute this document in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially, provided that this copyright notice is reproduced in all copies. Nongovernmental users may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the reading or further copying of the copies they make or distribute. Nongovernmental users may not accept compensation of any manner in exchange for copies. All other rights reserved. This project was made possible by a generous grant from the Smith Richardson Foundation Approved by: August 2014 Ken E. Gause, Director International Affairs Group Center for Strategic Studies Copyright © 2014 CNA Foreword This is the second of three legal analyses commissioned as part of a project entitled, “U.S. Policy Options in the South China Sea.” The objective in asking experienced U.S international lawyers, such as Captain J.
    [Show full text]
  • Dáil Éireann
    Vol. 703 Tuesday, No. 4 2 March 2010 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DÁIL ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Tuesday, 2 March 2010. Ceisteanna—Questions Taoiseach ………………………………… 673 Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources Priority Questions …………………………… 685 Other Questions …………………………… 695 Adjournment Debate Matters …………………………… 700 Leaders’ Questions ……………………………… 700 Death of Former Member: Expressions of Sympathy ………………… 707 Requests to move Adjournment of Dáil under Standing Order 32 ……………… 712 Order of Business ……………………………… 712 Planning and Development (Amendment) Bill 2009 [Seanad] Second Stage (resumed) ……… 718 Private Members’ Business Civil Liability (Good Samaritans and Volunteers) Bill 2009: Second Stage ………… 736 Adjournment Debate Industrial Disputes …………………………… 756 Water and Sewerage Schemes ………………………… 758 Flood Relief ……………………………… 760 Schools Building Projects …………………………… 762 Questions: Written Answers …………………………… 765 DÁIL ÉIREANN ———— Dé Máirt, 2 Márta 2010. Tuesday, 2 March 2010. ———— Chuaigh an Ceann Comhairle i gceannas ar 2.30 p.m. ———— Paidir. Prayer. ———— Ceisteanna — Questions. ———— Appointments to State Boards. 1. Deputy Enda Kenny asked the Taoiseach the appointments made by him since June 2002 to State boards or other agencies within his aegis; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48401/09] 2. Deputy Enda Kenny asked the Taoiseach the names, occupations and dates of appoint- ment of those appointed to the boards of State agencies and bodies under the aegis of his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48406/09] 3. Deputy Eamon Gilmore asked the Taoiseach the appointments made by him to boards or agencies operating under the aegis of his Department since June 2002 to date; and if he will make a statement on the matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Ft. Jackson Gls Organ1ze to Exerc1se Their Rights
    Bay Area labor-student aid pact -See pages 6 & 12 A discussion of 50S's youth movement resolution -See page 8- Ft. Jackson Gls organ1ze• to exerc1se• their rights Antiwar Gls initiate meet1ngs,• pet1t1ons• • By Lew Jones FT. JACKSON, S.C., Feb. 13- Do Gls have the right to freely discuss the war in Vietnam? Growing numbers of Gls at Ft. Jackson, S.C., think they do. A petition circulated by antiwar Gls at Ft. Jackson and calling on the post commander to authorize and provide facilities for an open meeting to discuss the war has met an immediate favorable response. More than 400 petition sheets are now circulating all over Ft. Jackson, includ­ ing the basic training area. After only one-and-a­ half days of signature gathering, over 200 sig­ natures have been turned in. The petition requests permission of the Ft. Jack­ son commanding officer to bold an open meeting on the post on Feb. 26 at which all those con­ cerned can freely discuss the legal and moral questions relating to the war in Vietnam and to the civil rights of American citizens both within and outside the armed forces. The petition points out that G Is desire to exer­ cise the rights guaranteed them as citizens by the First Amendment to the Constitution. (See the Feb. 14 Militant for full text of petition.) The petition was initiated by a group calling itself Gis United Against the War in Vietnam. Ft. Jackson is a training base. Gis are sent through basic training, advanced infantry train­ ing and combat-support training here.
    [Show full text]