Proposal & Strategy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proposal & Strategy A successor to The Irish National Seabed Survey Proposal & Strategy March 2007 A note on the second version This document was first produced in June 2005 and was used as input to the preparation for a memo to government outlining the case for the establishment of the INFOMAR Programme. Subsequent to the establishment of the programme the subject of areas covered by the Irish National Seabed Survey, Petroleum Affairs Division, as well as the meaning of the Irish Designated Area and the Irish Aspirational Area were clarified at a hearing of the Public Accounts Committee. This second version includes those clarified terms and definitions of areas. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................. 8 2. PROPOSED STRATEGY .................................................................................... 12 2.1. Background ............................................................................................... 12 3. STRATEGIC DRIVERS ....................................................................................... 25 3.1. Legislative Requirements and Obligations ...................................................... 25 3.1.1. UNCLOS ........................................................................................... 26 3.1.2. Navigation & Safety At Sea................................................................... 28 3.1.3. Marine Environment, Habitat Mapping & Biodiversity................................ 30 3.1.4. Underwater Cultural Heritage................................................................ 31 3.1.5. Water Framework Directive .................................................................. 32 3.1.6. Marine Framework Directive ................................................................. 32 3.1.7. Integrated Coastal Zone Management ................................................... 33 3.1.8. Summary ........................................................................................... 33 3.2. Marine Resources Requirements & Obligations............................................... 36 3.2.1. Fishing Resources .............................................................................. 36 3.2.2. Aquaculture Development .................................................................... 36 3.2.3. Seaweed Development........................................................................ 37 3.2.4. Renewable Energy Resources.............................................................. 37 3.2.5. Marine Aggregate Resources................................................................ 37 3.2.6. Infrastructure Resource........................................................................ 38 3.2.7. Oceanographic Drivers for Data ............................................................ 38 3.2.8. Navigational Drivers for Data ................................................................ 39 3.2.9. Tourism Drivers for Data ...................................................................... 39 3.2.10. Research Drivers for Data........................................................................ 39 4. IMPLEMENTATION............................................................................................ 43 4.2. INFOMAR Programme Management Structure ............................................... 44 4.2.1. Team 1. Acquisition ............................................................................ 45 4.2.2 Team 2. Data Management, Exchange & Integration................................... 45 4.2.3. Team 3. Value added Products and Services.................................................... 45 5. Conclusions & Recommendations......................................................................... 48 LIST OF APPENDICES: Appendix I: Background to INSS Appendix II: INSS Vessel Outputs and Deliverables Appendix III: Stakeholders Consulted Appendix IV: List of Priority Bays and Areas Appendix V: Proposed Survey Methodology Appendix VI: An assessment of the optimal use and application in the medium to long-term future of the INSS deliverables to date (Phase 1) and to contribute to Phase 2. CSA Group, CIRCA Group and Swiftsure Spatial Systems Inc. (2005) LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Coastal Inshore Mapping Costs 9 Figure 1.2. The Irish EEZ showing areas surveyed to date 10 Figure 2.1. INFOMAR Strategy Implementation Overview 15 Figure 2.2. Priority Bays and Areas 16 Figure 2.3. Inshore zone showing 10m and 50m contours 17 Figure 2.4. Map of Irish Box, Irish EEZ and the Biologically 19 Sensitive Area Figure 3.1. Information Flow Chart showing Intended Outcomes 26 Figure 3.2. Summary diagram showing the geographical extents 34 of the various Treaties, Acts and Regulations covering the Continental Shelf Figure 3.3. Strategic Marine Research Partnerships established by 38 Ireland and our strategic location with regard to the Gulf Stream and Climate Change Studies Figure 4.1. Overview of Management Structure and Work Flows 46 LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1. Examples of Leveraged Research by the INSS Database 11 and Associated Expertise Capacity Table 2.1. Location and Extent of the Principal Activities and Coastal 18 Resources on a coastal sector basis Table 3.1. Fulfilment of requirements of the various Acts and Treaties 35 Table 4.1. Proposed INFOMAR Budget 47 Table 4.2. Summary Table 47 ABBREVIATIONS BIM Bord Iascaigh Mhara BSA Biologically Sensitive Area CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CIL Commissioner for Irish Lights CLCS UN Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf CMRC Coastal and Marine Resources Centre CSO Central Statistics Office CTD Conductivity, Temperature, Depth DAF Department of Finance DCMNR Department of Communications, Marine & Natural Resources DEHLG Department of Environment, Heritage & Local Government EEZ Exclusive Economic zone ENFO Environmental Public Information Service EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESONET European Seafloor Observatory Network Project ESONIM European Seafloor Observatory Network Implementation EU European Union FP6 EU 6th Framework Programme FP7 EU 7th Framework Programme FTEs Full Time Employments GMES EU Global Monitoring for Environment & Security Initiative GSI Geological Survey of Ireland HABMAP Habitat Mapping for conservation & management of the Southern Irish Sea HEA Higher Education Authority HERMES Hotspot Ecosystem Research on the Margins of European Seas ICES International Council for the Exploration of the Seas ICSTI Irish Council for Science, Technology & Innovation ICZM Integrated Coastal Zone Management IHO International Hydrographic Organisation IMAGIN Irish sea Marine Aggregates Imitative IMO International Maritime Organisation INFOMAR Integrated Mapping for the Sustainable Development of Ireland’s Marine Resource INSS Irish National Seabed Survey ISDI Irish Spatial Data Initiative JNCC Joint Nature Conservation Committee LAT Lowest Astronomical Tide LIDAR Light Detection and Ranging LINZ Land Information New Zealand MARPOL International Convention for the Protection of Pollution from Ships MESH Mapping European Seabed Habitats MFD Marine Framework Directive MI Marine Institute NDP National Development Plan NPWS National Parks & Wildlife Service NUIG National University of Ireland, Galway OSPAR Oslo Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Northeast Atlantic PAD Petroleum Affairs Division, DCMNR PIP Petroleum Infrastructure Programme, DCMNR PTRLI Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions R&D Research and Development R&I Research and Innovation RPII Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland RTD Research, Technology & Development RV Research Vessel SAC Special Area of Conservation SAR International Convention on Maritime Search & Rescue SEA Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive SEI Sustainable Energy Ireland SME Small to Medium Enterprise SOLAS International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea TAC Total Allowable Catch TCMs Technical Conservation Measures UK United Kingdom UKHO United Kingdom Hydrographic Office UN United Nations UNCLOS UN Convention on the Law of the Sea UNESCO UN Educational, Scientific & Cultural Organisation US United States of America VFM Value for Money WFD Water Framework Directive WGI INSS Working Group WGMHM ICES Working Group on Marine Habitat Mapping EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In only six years, Ireland has developed a world-leading reputation1 for seabed mapping including methodologies, human capacity, know how and physical infrastructure. This was accomplished through the successful implementation of the Irish National Seabed Survey (INSS). To date, over 527,000km² 2 of the Irish designated seafloor area through various state led survey programmes. For an INSS investment of 32M 432,000km² p was covered, over 300 paper-based charts produced and a total of 5.5 Tb of digital information stored on the INSS database.3 The INSS operation from 1999 to 2005 has established an essential national asset, composed of: ° A marine data set to underpin present and future Irish economic, environmental, infrastructural and social, policy decisions ° Upgraded Irish marine surveying infrastructure; ° Personnel skilled in the design, planning, implementation and management of a large scale integrated marine resource evaluation programme ° The body of knowledge required to design, procure, build and operate the largest Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) survey conducted
Recommended publications
  • (MSC) Public Comment Draft Report SFSAG Rockall Haddock on Behalf
    MSC Full Assessment Reporting Template FCR v2.0 (16 th March 2015) MEC V1.1 (2nd October 2017) Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Public Comment Draft Report SFSAG Rockall haddock On behalf of Scottish Fisheries Sustainable Accreditation Group (SFSAG) Prepared by ME Certification Ltd May 2018 Authors: Dr Hugh Jones Dr Robin Cook Dr Jo Gascoigne Dr Geir Hønneland ME Certification Ltd 56 High Street, Lymington Hampshire SO41 9AH United Kingdom Tel: 01590 613007 Fax: 01590 671573 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.me-cert.com MSC Full Assessment Reporting Template FCR v2.0 (16 th March 2015) MEC V1.1 (2nd October 2017) Contents GLOSSARY ............................................................................................................................. 3 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 6 2 AUTHORSHIP AND PEER REVIEWERS ................................................................................ 8 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE FISHERY ....................................................................................... 10 3.1 Unit(s) of Assessment (UoA) and Scope of Certification Sought ........................... 10 3.1.1 UoA and Proposed Unit of Certification (UoC) .............................................................. 10 3.1.2 Final UoC(s) .................................................................................................................. 11 3.1.3 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and Catch Data ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dáil Éireann
    Vol. 703 Tuesday, No. 4 2 March 2010 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DÁIL ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Tuesday, 2 March 2010. Ceisteanna—Questions Taoiseach ………………………………… 673 Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources Priority Questions …………………………… 685 Other Questions …………………………… 695 Adjournment Debate Matters …………………………… 700 Leaders’ Questions ……………………………… 700 Death of Former Member: Expressions of Sympathy ………………… 707 Requests to move Adjournment of Dáil under Standing Order 32 ……………… 712 Order of Business ……………………………… 712 Planning and Development (Amendment) Bill 2009 [Seanad] Second Stage (resumed) ……… 718 Private Members’ Business Civil Liability (Good Samaritans and Volunteers) Bill 2009: Second Stage ………… 736 Adjournment Debate Industrial Disputes …………………………… 756 Water and Sewerage Schemes ………………………… 758 Flood Relief ……………………………… 760 Schools Building Projects …………………………… 762 Questions: Written Answers …………………………… 765 DÁIL ÉIREANN ———— Dé Máirt, 2 Márta 2010. Tuesday, 2 March 2010. ———— Chuaigh an Ceann Comhairle i gceannas ar 2.30 p.m. ———— Paidir. Prayer. ———— Ceisteanna — Questions. ———— Appointments to State Boards. 1. Deputy Enda Kenny asked the Taoiseach the appointments made by him since June 2002 to State boards or other agencies within his aegis; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48401/09] 2. Deputy Enda Kenny asked the Taoiseach the names, occupations and dates of appoint- ment of those appointed to the boards of State agencies and bodies under the aegis of his Department; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [48406/09] 3. Deputy Eamon Gilmore asked the Taoiseach the appointments made by him to boards or agencies operating under the aegis of his Department since June 2002 to date; and if he will make a statement on the matter.
    [Show full text]
  • "This Mere Speck on the Surface of the Waters": Rockall Aka Waveland
    "This mere speck on the surface of the waters": Rockall aka Waveland Royle, S. A. (2014). "This mere speck on the surface of the waters": Rockall aka Waveland. Shima, 8(1), 71-82. http://www.shimajournal.org/previous.html Published in: Shima Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights © 2014 Shima This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits distribution and reproduction for non-commercial purposes, provided the author and source are cited. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:06. Oct. 2021 Royle: Rockall / Waveland “THIS MERE SPECK IN THE SURFACE OF THE WATERS”: ROCKALL aka WAVELAND STEPHEN A. ROYLE Queen’s University Belfast <[email protected]> Abstract Rockall is a tiny granite knoll isolated in the stormy waters of the North Atlantic.
    [Show full text]
  • Ireland and the Rockall Dispute: an Analysis of Recent Developments
    78 Articles Section Ireland and the Rockall Dispute: An Analysis of Recent Developments Clive R. Symmons as well as to national fishing rights in the Introduction surrounding seas [emphasis added]. The legal issues surrounding the remote Atlantic The recent Irish statement implies that Ireland still rock of Rockall have been a long-standing saga for considers the status of the rock itself to be a live Ireland, centring on what maritime zones such a issue as it goes on to say: “Both sides remain aware 1 2 minuscule and distant insular formation may of the continuing position of their counterpart in generate. They have progressively escalated from an the matter [of jurisdiction over the rock].”12 But as essentially bilateral dispute between the UK and yet there appears to have been no “political 3 Ireland to what is now a major quadrilateral dispute discussion” about the title issue concerning the rock; between the UK, Ireland, Denmark (on behalf of the and it is interesting to note that in the recent British 4 Faeroes) and Iceland, and involving issues on press release of 21 July 1997 – following the seabed rights which no longer remain realistically dramatic British change of position on accession to linked to the effect of mere ownership of the rock. the 1982 LOSC – it is stated that the “UK’s title to Rockall will not be affected” and that the island In terms of ownership, the rock is undeniably “will remain part of Scotland” (under the 1972 5 British; and none of the other disputants has Island of Rockall Act).
    [Show full text]
  • Download/?Id=92} Accessed on 26 July 2013
    INTERNATIONAL ORDER IN THE OCEANS: TERRITORIALITY, SECURITY AND THE POLITICAL CONSTRUCTION OF JURISDICTION OVER RESOURCES AT SEA by James Stephen Baker M.A. (hons), The University of St Andrews, 2004 M.A., The University of British Columbia, 2006 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in The Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies (Political Science) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) October 2013 © James Stephen Baker Abstract The desire for territory has been a frequent cause of conflict. Latterly, a territorial integrity norm has emerged, rendering conquest illegitimate and contributing to peace. Studies of this development have not examined the politics of maritime space, despite the construction of a territorial-like order at sea last century. The oceans are materially, legally and politically distinct to land, making the extrapolation of a norm of territorial integrity to the oceans problematic. Nevertheless, this thesis concludes that the history of, and standards relating to land have conditioned the practices of states at sea. In particular, it has been assumed that the forceful acquisition of offshore zones and resources belonging to other states would breach an important international standard. I demonstrate this through a study of the changing practices of states towards marine space and by analysing the perspectives of decision-makers as they constructed the contemporary maritime property rights order. In contrast to the past, today states almost exclusively do not seek to expand beyond those offshore areas to which they are entitled. Concerns about the possibility for territorial conflict to take place at sea drove the creation of the present-day marine property rights order.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BELFAST AGREEMENT a Practical Legal Analysis
    THE BELFAST AGREEMENT A practical legal analysis Austen Morgan BSc MA in Law PhD of Lincoln’s Inn, Barrister and Member of the Inn of Court of Northern Ireland THE BELFAST PRESS London 2000 First published in Great Britain 2000 by The Belfast Press Limited 29 Ludgate Hill, London EC4M 7JE Copyright © Austen Morgan 2000 The Belfast Agreement CM 3883 Crown Copyright © 1998 The right of Austen Morgan to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 0-9539287-0-5 Designed and produced for The Belfast Press by Chase Publishing Services Printed in the European Union by Antony Rowe, Chippenham, England CONTENTS v Contents Prologue x Preface xiii Acknowledgements xxiii Table of Cases xxiv Table of Statutes and Other Domestic Legislation xxviii Table of Treaties and Other Documents xxxvii Abbreviations xlv Part 1 INTRODUCTION 1. What is the Belfast Agreement? 3 The extant texts 3 The relationship between politics and law 6 The relationship between the Multi-Party Agreement and the British-Irish Agreement of 10 April 1998 7 The giving effect to the Belfast Agreement in United Kingdom and Irish law 10 2. Public international law 15 The plane of international law 15 States and governments 17 Territorial sovereignty 18 Human rights and self-determination 19 The law of treaties 23 The pacific settlement of international disputes 25 The relationship between international and municipal law in the United Kingdom and Irish states 27 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Politics in the South China Sea
    University of Alberta Law and Politics in the South China Sea Assessing the Role of UNCLOS in Ocean Dispute Settlement by Nong Hong A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science ©Nong Hong Spring 2010 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-60561-5 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-60561-5 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats.
    [Show full text]
  • Who'll Get the Rockall Plateau?
    Ulla Svarrer Wang * Who'll get the Rockall Plateau? -An analysis ofthe claims to the continental shelf in the North East Atlantic by the United Kingdom, lreland, the Faroe lslands-Denmark, and lceland. Introduetion Continental Shelf Boundary Agreements Farae-Denmark- Norway F arae-Denmark- leeland Faroe-Denmark- UK UK-/re/and The continental shelf The Commission o n the Limits o f the Continental S h el f Geography of the Rockall sector Analys is o f the continental shelf claims Analysis ofthe UK claim Analysis ofthe lrish claim Analysis ofthe Faroese-Danish Claim Analysis ofthe leelandie Claim Discussion Condusion English Summary In the North East Allantic the United Kingdom, !re/and, the Faroe Islands­ Denmark, and leeland have competing claims to the continental shelf on the * MSc Engineering (Aalborg), LL.M. International Law (Napier University, Edinburgh). Føroyskt L6gar Rit (Faroese Law Review) vol. 1 no. 2- 2001 Rockall Plateau. In 1974 the UK and /re/and made their firs! continental shelf designations on the Rockall Plateau west of the Scottish and lrish coasts, and have subsequently designated additional continental shelf areas extending to the western edge of the Rockall Plateau. These two States agreed in 1988 on their continental shelf delimitation in this area. Farae­ Denmark and leeland designated their continental shelves in 1985, and their claims extend also to the Rockall Plateau and overlap with the UK's and lrish claims. There are now two main areas on the Rockall Plateau where there is a dispule on the rights to the continental shelf between (i) the UK, Faroe-Denmark, and leeland and (ii) !re/and, Faroe-Denmark, and /celand.
    [Show full text]
  • “THIS MERE SPECK in the SURFACE of the WATERS”: ROCKALL Aka WAVELAND
    Royle: Rockall / Waveland “THIS MERE SPECK IN THE SURFACE OF THE WATERS”: ROCKALL aka WAVELAND STEPHEN A. ROYLE Queen’s University Belfast <[email protected]> Abstract Rockall is a tiny granite knoll isolated in the stormy waters of the North Atlantic. It is not habitable and has of itself no economic value. However, given its location it has been a prize insofar as at one time it was thought its possession could bring control of an exclusive economic zone. Iceland, Ireland and Denmark laid claim in addition to the UK, which had annexed Rockall in 1955, the last territory to be taken into the British Empire. In 1972 Rockall was declared to be part of Scotland. However the United Nations Convention on the Laws of the Sea (1982) now precludes rocks incapable of supporting life to be awarded economic zones. Interest in Rockall then reverted to symbolism especially in its occupation by Greenpeace in 1997 when the global state of Waveland was declared from Rockall’s summit, with Rockall itself as the capital. Greenpeace stayed on Rockall longer than anybody else and a claim has been established to it thereby, but Waveland itself collapsed with the failure of the company that serviced its online presence. Key words Rockall, Waveland, Greenpeace, UNCLOS Introduction Rockall is a knoll of 784.3 sq m (8,442 sq ft) reaching a height of 21.4 m (70 feet) above sea level, the only part of a continental fragment in the North Atlantic to remain above water, although it can be washed over by extreme swells.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook on the Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries
    Handbook on the Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea Office of Legal Affairs United Nations • New York, 2000 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations conceming the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or conceming the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.Ol.V2 ISBN 92-1-133630-9 Copyright ~) United Nations, 2000 All rights reserved ¡¡¡ Contents FOREWORD ............................................................................................................... CHAPTER l. MARITIME ZONES SUBJECT TO BOUNDARY DELIMITATION ... 3 A. Baselines .................................................................................. .................. 3 l. Nonnal baselines. ................. ........................ ............... ... ............... 4 (a) Nonnal baselines ........................................................... 4 (b) Low-water !in e.............................................................. 4 2. Reefs ............................................................................................. 4 3. Low-tide elevations....................................................................... 5 4. Straight baselines .......................................................................... 5 5. Speciallocal applications.............................................................
    [Show full text]