IMPORTANT INFORMATION by SOLIDAR on 10Th SILVER ROSE AWARDS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IMPORTANT INFORMATION by SOLIDAR on 10Th SILVER ROSE AWARDS IMPORTANT INFORMATION BY SOLIDAR ON 10th SILVER ROSE AWARDS Wednesday 3 February 2010 European Parliament, Members Dining Room, Altierro Spinelli Building, Ground Floor 18.45-20.00 (followed by a reception) The 10th SOLIDAR Silver Rose Awards are being awarded to Colombian Trade Unions CUT- CTC-CGT, the European Roma Rights Centre, and former Prime Ministers Gyula Horn and Pierre Mauroy. These individuals and organisations are being awarded for their outstanding contributions to social justice and solidarity in Europe and the world. The awards ceremony will take place on Wednesday 3 February in the European Parliament in Brussels. The SOLIDAR Silver Rose Awards is this year celebrating its 10th Anniversary. Confirmed speakers at the event include Poul Nyrup Rasmussen, President of the Party of European Socialists and former President of Denmark and Martin Schulz MEP and President of the Group of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament. Below is more information about the four winners in the categories of International Solidarity, European Social Justice and Lifetime Achievement: International Solidarity: Colombia Trade Union Federations that are members of the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC): Central Unitaria de Trabajadores (CUT), Confederacion de Trabajadores de Colombia (CTC) and Confederacion General del Trabajo (CGT). Why? Colombia is the most dangerous country in the world to be active in trade unions. Despite the severe situation, the Colombian trade unions CUT, CTC and CGT, are continuing their important work to organise Colombian workers: workers who are working under bad conditions, in dangerous working environments, with low salaries, and bad or no insurances. European Social Justice: European Roma Rights Centre (ERRC) Why? An international public interest law organisation engaging in a range of activities aimed at combating anti-Romani racism and human rights abuse of Roma. It has increased public attention, condemned abuse, contributed to public interest law, developed EU policy documents, influenced human rights aspects of enlargement, become leading advocate in implementing anti- discrimination law. Two Awards for Lifetime Achievement: Gyula Horn, Former Prime Minster of Hungary Why? He was an active initiator and protagonist of the opening of the Hungarian foreign policy from the 1970s to late 1990s. A highlight in his career was when he helped to cut down the Iron Curtain along with his Austrian counterpart Alois Mock. Pierre Mauroy, Former Prime Minster of France Why? Mr Mauroy served as Prime Minister under François Mitterrand from 1981 to 1984 and also served as Mayor of Lille from 1973 to 2001. His cabinet introduced social reforms including reduction of the working time to 39 hours, retirement at 60 years and a rise in allowances. Mr Mauroy is also the founder of SOLIDAR member organisation, Léo Lagrange. ***************************************************************************** What: 10th SOLIDAR Silver Rose Awards When: Wednesday 3 February 2010 Where: European Parliament, Members Dining Room, Altierro Spinelli Building, Ground Floor, Rue Wiertz 60, 1047 Brussels When: 18.45-20.00 (followed by a reception) If you have not yet registered, please register through our online tool .
Recommended publications
  • PES Report of Activities 2001-2004 (24 April 2004)
    PES • PSE • SPE European Parliament rue Wiertz B 1047 Brussels PES report of activities 2001-2004 (24 April 2004) Introduction During the period between the 2001 Berlin Congress and 2004 Brussels Congress the Party of European Socialists has faced challenges both in political and organisational terms. After a period of extraordinary electoral success in the second half of the nineties, governmental participation of PES parties has gone down. Within the EU PES parties are in government in 6 out of 15 Member states, in the new Member States PES parties are in 5 out of 10 governments. There is however no reason to conclude that European Social Democracy is facing an electoral crisis. The vast majority of EU citizens from May 1 st onwards are governed at national level led by a PES party (Germany, United Kingdom, Sweden, Spain, Poland, Czech republic, Hungary and Lithuania) or by a government with PES party participation (Belgium, Finland and Slovenia.). Fact remains that during the period 2001-2004, President Robin Cook and the Presidency had to adapt the activities to the fact that less than before PES parties were governmental parties. The role of PES ministerial co-operation has decreased and more than before the PES has undertaken major policy co- ordination projects of its own. Two major policy co-ordination projects The co-ordination of the Social Democrat and Socialist members of the European Convention under the leadership of Giuliano Amato and later the globalisation project under the leadership of Poul Nyrup Rasmussen have been project of a magnitude and an impact the PES has never seen before.
    [Show full text]
  • Flexicurity – an Open Method of Coordination at the National Level ? Jean-Claude Barbier, Fabrice Colomb, Per Kongshøj Madsen
    Flexicurity – an open method of coordination at the national level ? Jean-Claude Barbier, Fabrice Colomb, Per Kongshøj Madsen To cite this version: Jean-Claude Barbier, Fabrice Colomb, Per Kongshøj Madsen. Flexicurity – an open method of coor- dination at the national level ?. 2009. halshs-00407394 HAL Id: halshs-00407394 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00407394 Submitted on 28 Jul 2009 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Documents de Travail du Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne Flexicurity – an open method of coordination, at the national level ? Jean-Claude BARBIER, Fabrice COLOMB, Per KongshØj MADSEN 2009.46 Maison des Sciences Économiques, 106-112 boulevard de L'Hôpital, 75647 Paris Cedex 13 http://ces.univ-paris1.fr/cesdp/CES-docs.htm ISSN : 1955-611X Flexicurity – an open method of coordination, at the national level? Jean-Claude Barbier Fabrice Colomb CNRS Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne Centre d’économie de la Sorbonne (CES) 106/112 Bd de l’Hôpital 75647 Paris Cedex 13, France Per Kongshøj Madsen Centre for Labour Market Research (CARMA) Aalborg University Fibigerstræde 1, DK-9220 Aalborg Ø., Denmark Document de Travail du Centre d'Economie1 de la Sorbonne - 2009.46 Résumé La flexicurité (ou flexisécurité) est une notion qui s’est répandue depuis le début des années 2000, à la suite de l’usage du terme aux Pays-Bas et au Danemark.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist a Dissertation Submitted In
    The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Jonah D. Levy, Chair Professor Jason Wittenberg Professor Jacob Citrin Professor Katerina Linos Spring 2015 The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe Copyright 2015 by Kimberly Ann Twist Abstract The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Jonah D. Levy, Chair As long as far-right parties { known chiefly for their vehement opposition to immigration { have competed in contemporary Western Europe, scholars and observers have been concerned about these parties' implications for liberal democracy. Many originally believed that far- right parties would fade away due to a lack of voter support and their isolation by mainstream parties. Since 1994, however, far-right parties have been included in 17 governing coalitions across Western Europe. What explains the switch from exclusion to inclusion in Europe, and what drives mainstream-right parties' decisions to include or exclude the far right from coalitions today? My argument is centered on the cost of far-right exclusion, in terms of both office and policy goals for the mainstream right. I argue, first, that the major mainstream parties of Western Europe initially maintained the exclusion of the far right because it was relatively costless: They could govern and achieve policy goals without the far right.
    [Show full text]
  • Day by Day Summary of the Election Campaign
    Day by Day Summary of the Election Campaign Friday, 26 August It was Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen’s plan to introduce a bonus to people purchasing a house. This bonus has been criticized for artificially inflating house prices and therefore for being a bad way to instigate growth. On Saturday 20 August the Social Democrats (S) somehow learned about the plan and decided to launch it themselves, despite Helle Thorning-Schmidt having said on Friday that she did not want to introduce measures to stimulate the housing market. This led to a chaotic Saturday where Løkke Rasmussen and the Liberal Party (V) tried to do damage control. Quickly the Danish People’s Party (DF) declared their opposition to the plan due to a lot of their voters not being house owners. Liberal Alliance (LA) is as a general rule opposed to state subsidies so they were opposed as well leaving V and the Conservative Party (K) alone with the plan on the blue wing. On the red wing the situation was similar. S and the Socialist People’s Party (SF) agreed on the idea while the Unity List (EL) represents the left wing and therefore does not believe in the state funding those with the means to buy a house – plus a lot of their voters rent their homes. The Social Liberal Party (R) is opposed with the argument that the plan is a shortsighted one which will probably not do much for the economy anyway. Thus S-SF and VK were alone and they did not want to cooperate to get a majority for the plan.
    [Show full text]
  • THE JUNCKER COMMISSION: an Early Assessment
    THE JUNCKER COMMISSION: An Early Assessment John Peterson University of Edinburgh Paper prepared for the 14th Biennial Conference of the EU Studies Association, Boston, 5-7th February 2015 DRAFT: Not for citation without permission Comments welcome [email protected] Abstract This paper offers an early evaluation of the European Commission under the Presidency of Jean-Claude Juncker, following his contested appointment as the so-called Spitzencandidat of the centre-right after the 2014 European Parliament (EP) election. It confronts questions including: What will effect will the manner of Juncker’s appointment have on the perceived legitimacy of the Commission? Will Juncker claim that the strength his mandate gives him license to run a highly Presidential, centralised Commission along the lines of his predecessor, José Manuel Barroso? Will Juncker continue to seek a modest and supportive role for the Commission (as Barroso did), or will his Commission embrace more ambitious new projects or seek to re-energise old ones? What effect will British opposition to Juncker’s appointment have on the United Kingdom’s efforts to renegotiate its status in the EU? The paper draws on a round of interviews with senior Commission officials conducted in early 2015 to try to identify patterns of both continuity and change in the Commission. Its central aim is to assess the meaning of answers to the questions posed above both for the Commission and EU as a whole in the remainder of the decade. What follows is the proverbial ‘thought piece’: an analysis that seeks to provoke debate and pose the right questions about its subject, as opposed to one that offers many answers.
    [Show full text]
  • Post DIGITAL REVOLUTION for the Many, Not for the Few
    10 # # The 10 WINTER 2018-2019 3.00 € Progressive Post DIGITAL REVOLUTION for the many, not for the few SPECIAL COVERAGE #EP2019 How could the Left recover? NEXT DEMOCRACY NEXT GLOBAL NEXT SOCIAL Baby-boomers vs Millennials Bolsonaro, the Left Social housing: back on and Europe the progressive agenda NEXT ECONOMY NEXT LEFT NEXT ENVIRONMENT FOLLOW UP End of Quantitative easing - Culture to rebuild Free public transport Global Compact for Safe, Scenarios for the real economy faith in democracy everywhere Orderly and Regular Migration Quarterly : December - January - February www.progressivepost.eu ProgressiveThe Post Europeans share a common history and future, but their ideas and ideals still need a public space. The Progressive Post The truly European progressive opinion magazine that gathers world-renowned experts, to offer a platform informing the public about the issues facing Europe today. The Progressive Post The magazine is published in two languages: English and French. We’ve got also partnerships with The Fabian Review (UK) and TEMAS (ES) Progressivepost.eu + @FEPS-Europe Daily analysis and opinion to supplement the print edition With the support of the European Parliament PUBLICATION DIRECTOR Ernst Stetter EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Alain Bloëdt EDITORS Karine Jehelmann, Olaf Bruns EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Ania Skrzypek, David Rinaldi, Vassilis Ntousas, Maria Freitas, Hedwig Giusto, Charlotte Billingham, Lisa Kastner, Laeticia Thissen, Justin Nogarède TRANSLATORS Ben O'Donovan, Amandine Gillet, Françoise Hoffelinck, Eurideas Language Experts PROOFREADING Louise Hanzlik, Stéphanie Bessalem COORDINATION & GRAPHIC DESIGN www.triptyque.be PHOTO CREDITS Shutterstock, The EU’s Audiovisual Media Services COVER ILLUSTRATION Peter Willems - Vec-Star COPYRIGHT © FEPS – Foundation for European Progressive Studies N°10 - Winter 2018 - 19 ISSN 2506-7362 EDITORIAL Digital: revolution without revolt by Maria Joao Rodrigues, FEPS President This edition focuses on the digital revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE SHAPING CHANGE in TURBULENT TIMES on the Occasion of the Federal Party Conference of the SPD
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE SHAPING CHANGE IN TURBULENT TIMES on the occasion of the Federal Party Conference of the SPD Venue: Willy-Brandt-Haus, Wilhelmstr. 140, 10963 Berlin PROVISIONAL AGENDA 03.12. 13:30 ENTRANCE 14:30 OPENING Welcome remarks by SIGMAR GABRIEL, Chair of the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) MARTIN SCHULZ, Member of the Presidium of the SPD, Leader of the Progressive Alliance of the Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament PANEL ON A STRONG SOCIAL DEMOCRACY FOR A STRONG EUROPE Inter alia: MASSIMO D‘ALEMA, President of the Foundation for European Progressive Studies and former Prime Minister of Italy VICTOR PoNTA, Party Chairman of the Romanian Social Democrats (PSD) PoUL NYRUP RASMUSSEN, President of the Party of European Socialists and former Prime Minister of Denmark BoRIS TADIC, President of the Republic of Serbia and Party Chairman of the Democratic Party of Serbia (tbc) Moderation: DAGMAR RoTH-BeHRENDT MEP, Vicepresident of the European Parliament STATEMENT OUR ResPONSIBILITY FOR CHANGE HAMed ABDEL-SAMAD, Political Scientist and Author from Egypt PANEL ON PROGRESSIVE PoLITICS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY Inter alia: WALDEN BeLLO, Member of the Philippines’ House of Representatives ALFRed GUSENBAUER, Vicepresident of the Socialist International and former Chancellor of Austria KJELD JAkoBSEN, International Advisor to the Chairman of the Brazil Workers’ Party (PT) JoHN PodesTA, President of the Center for American Progress DR. GIRIJA VYAS, Member of the Indian Parliament Moderation: DR. H.C. GeRNOT ERLER MP, Deputy Chair of the SPD Parliamentary Group 17:30 END OF THE INTERNATIONAL CoNFERENCE 18:00 sHUTTLE SERVICE TO THE RECEPTION 18:30 RECEPTION FOR INTERNATIONAL GUESTS HosTed BY THE voRWÄRTS Umspannwerk Kreuzberg, Ohlauer Straße 43, 10999 Berlin.
    [Show full text]
  • Kunsten at Lægge Historien Til Rette Anders Fogh Rasmussen Og Opgøret Med Den Danske Udenrigspolitiske Tradition
    KUNSTEN AT LÆGGE HISTORIEN TIL RETTE ANDERS FOGH RASMUSSEN OG OPGØRET MED DEN DANSKE UDENRIGSPOLITISKE TRADITION ROSANNA FARBØL Hvis du tager det sidste århundredes udenrigspolitik, var den jo fyldt med dobbeltmoral og hykleri. Tiden var præget af en typisk småstatstankegang om at leve stille og ube- mærket, foregive at være neutral og ikke lægge sig ud med nogen. Den tankegang skal ændres.1 Således karakteriserede forhenværende statsminister Anders Fogh Rasmussen i 2006 den danske udenrigspolitiske tradition samt regeringens udenrigspolitiske mission. Det var et af Anders Fogh Rasmussens stærkest markerede ønsker, at hans regeringers udenrigspolitiske proil skulle bryde med dansk udenrigspoli- tisk tradition. Han karakteriserede denne tradition som ‘den passive tilpasnings- politik’, hvor Danmark alt for ofte opgav at kæmpe for værdier som demokrati og frihedsrettigheder, og i stedet ydmygende tilpassede sig stormagter i et naivt håb om neutralitet. Samarbejdspolitikken under Besættelsen og dansk koldkrigspoli- tik, særligt fodnotepolitikken, var omdrejningspunkterne i opgøret med for tiden. Disse to politikker repræsenterede i Anders Fogh Rasmussens tolkning højde- punkterne af tilpasning i den danske udenrigspolitiske tradition, og udgjorde et internationalt såvel som et nationalt svigt samt moralsk forræderi. Opgøret med fortiden var en central del af den værdidebat, i pressen hurtigt døbt ’kulturkampen’, Anders Fogh Rasmussen startede i begyndelsen af det nye årtusinde. Værdidebattens formål var at gennemføre en holdningsændring, der skulle danne baggrund for en ændring af det danske samfund i en mere liberal retning, hvor individet i højere grad tog ansvar for sig selv. Dette skulle også gøre sig gældende i udenrigspolitikken, hvor Danmark skulle tage medansvar i ver- den, og aktivt forsvare og udbrede den vestlige verdens værdier.2 I bredere for- 1 Ugebrevet Mandag Morgen: ”Fogh” 11.9.2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the List of Participants
    46 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Socialfst International BULGARIA CZECH AND SLOVAK FED. FRANCE Pierre Maurey Bulgarian Social Democratic REPUBLIC Socialist Party, PS Luis Ayala Party, BSDP Social Democratic Party of Laurent Fabius Petar Dertliev Slovakia Gerard Fuchs Office of Willy Brandt Petar Kornaiev Jan Sekaj Jean-Marc Ayrault Klaus Lindenberg Dimit rin Vic ev Pavol Dubcek Gerard Collomb Dian Dimitrov Pierre Joxe Valkana Todorova DENMARK Yvette Roudy Georgi Kabov Social Democratic Party Pervenche Beres Tchavdar Nikolov Poul Nyrup Rasmussen Bertrand Druon FULL MEMBER PARTIES Stefan Radoslavov Lasse Budtz Renee Fregosi Ralf Pittelkow Brigitte Bloch ARUBA BURKINA FASO Henrik Larsen Alain Chenal People's Electoral Progressive Front of Upper Bj0rn Westh Movement, MEP Volta, FPV Mogens Lykketoft GERMANY Hyacinthe Rudolfo Croes Joseph Ki-Zerbo Social Democratic Party of DOMINICAN REPUBLIC Germany, SPD ARGENTINA CANADA Dominican Revolutionary Bjorn Entolm Popular Socialist Party, PSP New Democratic Party, Party, PRD Hans-Joe en Vogel Guillermo Estevez Boero NDP/NPD Jose Francisco Pena Hans-Ulrich Klose Ernesto Jaimovich Audrey McLaughlin Gomez Rosemarie Bechthum Eduardo Garcia Tessa Hebb Hatuey de Camps Karlheinz Blessing Maria del Carmen Vinas Steve Lee Milagros Ortiz Bosch Hans-Eberhard Dingels Julie Davis Leonor Sanchez Baret Freimut Duve AUSTRIA Lynn Jones Tirso Mejia Ricart Norbert Gansel Social Democratic Party of Rejean Bercier Peg%:'. Cabral Peter Glotz Austria, SPOe Diane O'Reggio Luz el Alba Thevenin Ingamar Hauchler Franz Vranitzky Keith
    [Show full text]
  • “Europe, Our Common Future” Celebrating
    EUROPE, OUR COMMON FUTURE “Europe, Our Common Future” Celebrating of the Party of European Socialists By: Dr Ania Skrzypek Senior Research Fellow FEPS 1 EUROPE, OUR COMMON FUTURE “Europe, Our Common Future” Celebrating 20 years of the Party of European Socialists 1 “Europe, Our Common Future” is the title of the founding “The Den Haag Declaration”, as adopted by the First Congress of the Party of the European Socialists in the Hague on 9th -10th November 1992. By: Dr Ania Skrzypek Senior Research Fellow FEPS Published in Belgium in 2013 By FEPS - Foundation for European Progressive Studies, with the financial support of the European Parliament Design: p-l-a-s-m-a . net Copyright © FEPS – Foundation for European Progressive Studies ISBN: 978-3-85464-037-0 Number was received thanks to Renner Institut Responsible Publisher: Ernst Stetter, FEPS Secretary General at [email protected] For more information, please contact also : Alain Bloëdt, FEPS Communication Advisor at [email protected] EUROPE, OUR COMMON FUTURE INDEX FOREWORDS 5 Massimo D’AlEMA 6 Sergei Stanishev 5 5 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CHAPTERS 10 1. Spring of European Socialism 1951-1992 16 2. Founding the Party of European Socialists 1991-1992 28 3. Formulating a Socialist Agenda for Europe 29 3.1 PES Manifestos in the last two decades 33 3.2 Manifesto 1994 37 3.3. Manifesto 1999 42 3.4 Manifesto 2004 50 3.5 Manifesto 2009 64 4. Building a European Socialist Party 65 4.1 The morning after... 67 4.2 The first decade: from The Hague to Berlin (2001) 73 4.3 Berlin Reform 2001: Strengthening awareness and internal cohesion 78 4.4 From Berlin 2001 to vienna 2005 82 4.5 vienna Reform 2005: “For Stronger PES” 90 5.
    [Show full text]
  • PE Mall Foto B
    CONFERENCE SPEAKERS - PANELS Hannes Swoboda is leading the Parliamentary Bruno Group of Socialists & Democrats (S&D Group) in Liebhaberg is the the European Parliament since January 2012. After President of the having held various political posts at regional and Scientific Council national level in Austria, he became a member of of the Foundation the European Parliament in 1996. Mr Swoboda has for European a long experience as an MEP, having also Progressive previously served as the leader of the Austrian Studies. A former SPÖ delegation and then as Vice-President of the adviser to Jacques S&G Group for Parliamentary Affairs. He is a committed co-founder of Delors, he is the President of the the Progressive Economy initiative and a leading political voice "Gauche Réformiste Européenne" against the current strict austerity agenda at European level. and the Director General of CERRE (Centre on Regulation in Europe). He is also professor at the Solvay Poul Nyrup Rasmussen is the former Brussels School of Economic and President of the Party of European Management. Socialists (2004-2011) and a former Prime Minister of Denmark (1993-2001). He has also served as a member of the European Pierre Moscovici is the French Parliament from 2004 to 2009. Poul Nyrup Minister of Finance and Economic Rasmussen has prominently pushed for Affairs since May tighter European regulation on financial 2012. He has service activities already before the crisis, a rich experience notably on hedge funds. Under his leadership, the PES developed in national and into a pro-active political party at European level, notably with a European politics, strong focus on economic and social policy matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping the Peace to Come Trying to Help
    Trying to help, shaping the peace to come the scandinavian role in the middle east In spite of the diversity of national situations, there is undoubtedly a Scandinavian dimension in political culture, not only economic and environmental, but also in the field of foreign policy. This is particularly true insofar as the Middle East, and the Palestinian- Israeli conflict in particular, is concerned. Ilan Halevi is the Fatah representative in the Socialist International, a member of the plo, and a writer.1 4o with which those parties took their mem- bership in the Socialist International (si), made the latter a privileged instrument, or at least a positive echo-chamber, of Scandi- navian Middle East policies. Having per- sonally represented the plo and Fatah in the si for more than two decades, I have been a privileged witness to this process, the implications of which are still highly relevant to the present day impasses. Of course, this is a specific angle of vision and recollection, and may not constitute the whole picture: attempts to put an end to the conflict came from many quarters, includ- ing the us, but also the ussr, as well as Ceausescu’s Romania or Tito’s and post- Tito Yugoslavia. Recently, South Africa, for example, has also joined the group of states trying to contribute to the Middle East peace process. The matter here is to high- text: Ilan Halevi light the distinct Scandinavian role: not to claim it was the most decisive one, or the from a “narrow” Palestinian point of sole relevant one. view, “Nordic” involvement with the con- The most decisive factor in whatever flict is marked, as early as 1948, with the progress has been achieved throughout the assassination, by Zionist extremists, of un years in the direction of peace remains the Mediator Folke Bernadotte, because he double capacity of the Palestinian people to refused to endorse the Israeli occupation of resist occupation and national obliteration, Jerusalem and demanded the return of the and to aspire to a peaceful settlement on Palestinian refugees to their homes.
    [Show full text]