DOCSLIB.ORG

Debate on the Future of Europe (Debate)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Debate on the Future of Europe (Debate) 24.4.2008 EN Official Journal of the European Union C 102 E/23 Tuesday 22 May 2007 After the two-week deadline has passed, the list of corrections to votes and voting intentions will be fina- lised so that it can be translated and published in the Official Journal. Martine Roure and Dariusz Maciej Grabowski had informed the Chair that their voting machines had not worked during the vote on the Morillon report (A6-0160/2007). (The sitting was suspended at 12.50 and resumed at 15.05.) IN THE CHAIR: Hans-Gert PÖTTERING President 12. Debate on the future of Europe (debate) The President made a brief statement by way of an introduction to the debate. The following spoke: Romano Prodi, the Italian Prime Minister. The following spoke: Joseph Daul, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group, Martin Schulz, on behalf of the PSE Group, Graham Watson, on behalf of the ALDE Group, Cristiana Muscardini, on behalf of the UEN Group, Monica Frassoni, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Francis Wurtz, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group, Nigel Farage, on behalf of the IND/DEM Group, Jean-Marie Le Pen, on behalf of the ITS Group, Jana Bobošíková, Non-attached Member, Romano Prodi, Antonio Tajani, Gianni Pittella, Bronisław Geremek, Roberta Angelilli, Johannes Voggenhuber, Roberto Musacchio, Paul Marie Coûteaux, Koenraad Dillen, Irena Belohorská, Timothy Kirkhope, Hannes Swoboda, Lapo Pistelli, Mario Borghezio, Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Umberto Guidoni, Georgios Karatzaferis, József Szájer, Poul Nyrup Rasmussen, Marco Cappato and Genowefa Grabowska. The debate closed. IN THE CHAIR: Rodi KRATSA-TSAGAROPOULOU Vice-President 13. Approval of Minutes of previous sitting James Nicholson had informed the Presidency that he had been present but that his name was not on the attendance register. The Minutes of the previous sitting were approved. 14. Situation in Palestine (debate) Council and Commission statements: Situation in Palestine Günter Gloser (President-in-Office of the Council) and Benita Ferrero-Waldner (Member of the Commission) made the statements. The following spoke: José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group, Pasqualina Napoletano, on behalf of the PSE Group, Chris Davies, on behalf of the ALDE Group, Ryszard Czarnecki, on behalf of the UEN Group, Caroline Lucas, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group, Paul Marie Coûteaux, on behalf of the IND/DEM Group, Philip Claeys, on behalf of the ITS Group, Jim Allister, Non-attached Member, Edward McMillan-Scott, Véronique De Keyser, Alexander Lambsdorff, Jan Tadeusz Masiel, Johannes Voggenhuber, Luisa Morgantini, Georgios Karatzaferis, Jean-Claude Martinez, Charles Tannock, Hannes Swoboda, Vittorio Prodi, Paul van Buitenen, Bastiaan Belder, Günter Gloser, Jana Hybášková, Jamila Madeira, Hannu Takkula and Frieda Brepoels. C 102 E/24 Official Journal of the European Union EN 24.4.2008 Tuesday 22 May 2007 IN THE CHAIR: Manuel António dos SANTOS Vice-President The following spoke: Béatrice Patrie, Marios Matsakis, Filip Kaczmarek, David Martin, Sarah Ludford, John Bowis, Libor Rouček and Benita Ferrero-Waldner. The debate closed. 15. Question Time (Commission) Parliament considered a number of questions to the Commission (B6-0018/2007). Part one Question 30 (David Martin): The negative consequences of the EU biofuels targets. Andris Piebalgs (Member of the Commission) answered the question and supplementaries by David Martin, Danutė Budreikaitė and Reinhard Rack. Question 31 (Danutė Budreikaitė): Energy agreement between EU Member States and Russia. Andris Piebalgs answered the question and supplementaries by Danutė Budreikaitė, Paul Rübig and Justas Vincas Paleckis. Part two Question 33 (Claude Moraes): Hate websites. Franco Frattini (Vice-President of the Commission) answered the question and supplementaries by Claude Moraes, Andreas Mölzer and Hubert Pirker. Question 34 (Glenis Willmott): EU-wide hotline for victims of forced prostitution. Franco Frattini answered the question and supplementaries by Glenis Willmott, Richard Seeber and Justas Vincas Paleckis. Questions 35 to 37 would receive written answers. Question 38 lapsed as its author was absent. Arlene McCarthy spoke on the conduct of Question Time. Question 39 (Marco Cappato): Access to communication for people with disabilities. Viviane Reding (Member of the Commission) answered the question and a supplementary by Marco Cappato. Question 40 (Georgios Papastamkos): Separation on electronic communications markets. Viviane Reding answered the question and a supplementary by Georgios Papastamkos. Question 41 (Katerina Batzeli): European framework for the safer use of mobile telephones by adolescents and children. Viviane Reding answered the question and a supplementary by Katerina Batzeli..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PES Report of Activities 2001-2004 (24 April 2004)
    PES • PSE • SPE European Parliament rue Wiertz B 1047 Brussels PES report of activities 2001-2004 (24 April 2004) Introduction During the period between the 2001 Berlin Congress and 2004 Brussels Congress the Party of European Socialists has faced challenges both in political and organisational terms. After a period of extraordinary electoral success in the second half of the nineties, governmental participation of PES parties has gone down. Within the EU PES parties are in government in 6 out of 15 Member states, in the new Member States PES parties are in 5 out of 10 governments. There is however no reason to conclude that European Social Democracy is facing an electoral crisis. The vast majority of EU citizens from May 1 st onwards are governed at national level led by a PES party (Germany, United Kingdom, Sweden, Spain, Poland, Czech republic, Hungary and Lithuania) or by a government with PES party participation (Belgium, Finland and Slovenia.). Fact remains that during the period 2001-2004, President Robin Cook and the Presidency had to adapt the activities to the fact that less than before PES parties were governmental parties. The role of PES ministerial co-operation has decreased and more than before the PES has undertaken major policy co- ordination projects of its own. Two major policy co-ordination projects The co-ordination of the Social Democrat and Socialist members of the European Convention under the leadership of Giuliano Amato and later the globalisation project under the leadership of Poul Nyrup Rasmussen have been project of a magnitude and an impact the PES has never seen before.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Ecosy Congress
    10 TH ECOSY CONGRESS Bucharest, 31 March – 3 April 2011 th Reports of the 9 Mandate ECOSY – Young European Socialists “Talking about my generation” CONTENTS Petroula Nteledimou ECOSY President p. 3 Janna Besamusca ECOSY Secretary General p. 10 Brando Benifei Vice President p. 50 Christophe Schiltz Vice President p. 55 Kaisa Penny Vice President p. 57 Nils Hindersmann Vice President p. 60 Pedro Delgado Alves Vice President p. 62 Joan Conca Coordinator Migration and Integration network p. 65 Marianne Muona Coordinator YFJ network p. 66 Michael Heiling Coordinator Pool of Trainers p. 68 Miki Dam Larsen Coordinator Queer Network p. 70 Sandra Breiteneder Coordinator Feminist Network p. 71 Thomas Maes Coordinator Students Network p. 72 10 th ECOSY Congress 2 Held thanks to hospitality of TSD Bucharest, Romania 31 st March - 3 rd April 2011 9th Mandate reports ECOSY – Young European Socialists “Talking about my generation” Petroula Nteledimou, ECOSY President Report of activities, 16/04/2009 – 01/04/2011 - 16-19/04/2009 : ECOSY Congress , Brussels (Belgium). - 24/04/2009 : PES Leaders’ Meeting , Toulouse (France). Launch of the PES European Elections Campaign. - 25/04/2009 : SONK European Elections event , Helsinki (Finland). Speaker on behalf of ECOSY. - 03/05/2009 : PASOK Youth European Elections event , Drama (Greece). Speaker on behalf of ECOSY. - 04/05/2009 : Greek Women’s Union European Elections debate , Kavala (Greece). Speaker on behalf of ECOSY. - 07-08/05/2009 : European Youth Forum General Assembly , Brussels (Belgium). - 08/05/2009 : PES Presidency meeting , Brussels (Belgium). - 09-10/05/2009 : JS Portugal European Election debate , Lisbon (Portugal). Speaker on behalf of ECOSY.
    [Show full text]
  • Flexicurity – an Open Method of Coordination at the National Level ? Jean-Claude Barbier, Fabrice Colomb, Per Kongshøj Madsen
    Flexicurity – an open method of coordination at the national level ? Jean-Claude Barbier, Fabrice Colomb, Per Kongshøj Madsen To cite this version: Jean-Claude Barbier, Fabrice Colomb, Per Kongshøj Madsen. Flexicurity – an open method of coor- dination at the national level ?. 2009. halshs-00407394 HAL Id: halshs-00407394 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00407394 Submitted on 28 Jul 2009 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Documents de Travail du Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne Flexicurity – an open method of coordination, at the national level ? Jean-Claude BARBIER, Fabrice COLOMB, Per KongshØj MADSEN 2009.46 Maison des Sciences Économiques, 106-112 boulevard de L'Hôpital, 75647 Paris Cedex 13 http://ces.univ-paris1.fr/cesdp/CES-docs.htm ISSN : 1955-611X Flexicurity – an open method of coordination, at the national level? Jean-Claude Barbier Fabrice Colomb CNRS Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne Centre d’économie de la Sorbonne (CES) 106/112 Bd de l’Hôpital 75647 Paris Cedex 13, France Per Kongshøj Madsen Centre for Labour Market Research (CARMA) Aalborg University Fibigerstræde 1, DK-9220 Aalborg Ø., Denmark Document de Travail du Centre d'Economie1 de la Sorbonne - 2009.46 Résumé La flexicurité (ou flexisécurité) est une notion qui s’est répandue depuis le début des années 2000, à la suite de l’usage du terme aux Pays-Bas et au Danemark.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament: 7Th February 2017 Redistribution of Political Balance
    POLICY PAPER European issues n°420 European Parliament: 7th February 2017 redistribution of political balance Charles de Marcilly François Frigot At the mid-term of the 8th legislature, the European Parliament, in office since the elections of May 2014, is implementing a traditional “distribution” of posts of responsibility. Article 19 of the internal regulation stipulates that the Chairs of the parliamentary committees, the Deputy-Chairs, as well as the questeurs, hold their mandates for a renewable 2 and a-half year period. Moreover, internal elections within the political groups have supported their Chairs, whilst we note that there has been some slight rebalancing in terms of the coordinators’ posts. Although Italian citizens draw specific attention with the two main candidates in the battle for the top post, we should note other appointments if we are to understand the careful balance between nationalities, political groups and individual experience of the European members of Parliament. A TUMULTUOUS PRESIDENTIAL provide collective impetus to potential hesitations on the part of the Member States. In spite of the victory of the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European elections, it supported Martin As a result the election of the new President of Schulz in July 2104 who stood for a second mandate as Parliament was a lively[1] affair: the EPP candidate – President of the Parliament. In all, with the support of the Antonio Tajani – and S&D Gianni Pittella were running Liberals (ADLE), Martin Schulz won 409 votes following neck and neck in the fourth round of the relative an agreement concluded by the “grand coalition” after majority of the votes cast[2].
    [Show full text]
  • Conference's Programme
    ‘Working together to address the refugee crisis’ Programme Introduction Five years ago the PES and the GPF launched a series of events to talk about democracy and social justice in the aftermath of the Arab Spring. Today, the situation has changed dramatically. What started in Syria as an uprising against the regime of Bashar Al Assad, has now become a full-fledged war involving a myriad of actors and providing fertile ground for the rise of the Islamic State (IS). Conflicts erupted in Iraq, Yemen, Libya and the Sinai Peninsula in Egypt. Tunisia has endured two horrifying terrorist attacks in only a few months’ time, giving an unpredicted blow to the tourism sector, where the country gets most of its revenues. This summer an unprecedented flow of refugees has reached EU's borders, prompting a humanitarian crisis of proportions unseen in post-war Europe. This has led many of our social democratic leaders to call for unity and solidarity in order to find common answers, as the flow of refugees is unlikely to come to an end. This solidarity should start within Europe, but it should also apply to those countries in the Middle East that are carrying the heaviest burden of the refugee crisis. Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan have taken up scores of refugees, putting their already fragile population balance at risk. A recent UN report stated that the number of people uprooted has reached nearly 60 million, an all-time high. The causes and consequences of the current refugee crisis affect us all. Although the Middle East and North Africa is home to just 5% of the world’s population, it has produced more than one-third of its refugees.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist a Dissertation Submitted In
    The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Jonah D. Levy, Chair Professor Jason Wittenberg Professor Jacob Citrin Professor Katerina Linos Spring 2015 The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe Copyright 2015 by Kimberly Ann Twist Abstract The Mainstream Right, the Far Right, and Coalition Formation in Western Europe by Kimberly Ann Twist Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Jonah D. Levy, Chair As long as far-right parties { known chiefly for their vehement opposition to immigration { have competed in contemporary Western Europe, scholars and observers have been concerned about these parties' implications for liberal democracy. Many originally believed that far- right parties would fade away due to a lack of voter support and their isolation by mainstream parties. Since 1994, however, far-right parties have been included in 17 governing coalitions across Western Europe. What explains the switch from exclusion to inclusion in Europe, and what drives mainstream-right parties' decisions to include or exclude the far right from coalitions today? My argument is centered on the cost of far-right exclusion, in terms of both office and policy goals for the mainstream right. I argue, first, that the major mainstream parties of Western Europe initially maintained the exclusion of the far right because it was relatively costless: They could govern and achieve policy goals without the far right.
    [Show full text]
  • Day by Day Summary of the Election Campaign
    Day by Day Summary of the Election Campaign Friday, 26 August It was Prime Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen’s plan to introduce a bonus to people purchasing a house. This bonus has been criticized for artificially inflating house prices and therefore for being a bad way to instigate growth. On Saturday 20 August the Social Democrats (S) somehow learned about the plan and decided to launch it themselves, despite Helle Thorning-Schmidt having said on Friday that she did not want to introduce measures to stimulate the housing market. This led to a chaotic Saturday where Løkke Rasmussen and the Liberal Party (V) tried to do damage control. Quickly the Danish People’s Party (DF) declared their opposition to the plan due to a lot of their voters not being house owners. Liberal Alliance (LA) is as a general rule opposed to state subsidies so they were opposed as well leaving V and the Conservative Party (K) alone with the plan on the blue wing. On the red wing the situation was similar. S and the Socialist People’s Party (SF) agreed on the idea while the Unity List (EL) represents the left wing and therefore does not believe in the state funding those with the means to buy a house – plus a lot of their voters rent their homes. The Social Liberal Party (R) is opposed with the argument that the plan is a shortsighted one which will probably not do much for the economy anyway. Thus S-SF and VK were alone and they did not want to cooperate to get a majority for the plan.
    [Show full text]
  • THE JUNCKER COMMISSION: an Early Assessment
    THE JUNCKER COMMISSION: An Early Assessment John Peterson University of Edinburgh Paper prepared for the 14th Biennial Conference of the EU Studies Association, Boston, 5-7th February 2015 DRAFT: Not for citation without permission Comments welcome [email protected] Abstract This paper offers an early evaluation of the European Commission under the Presidency of Jean-Claude Juncker, following his contested appointment as the so-called Spitzencandidat of the centre-right after the 2014 European Parliament (EP) election. It confronts questions including: What will effect will the manner of Juncker’s appointment have on the perceived legitimacy of the Commission? Will Juncker claim that the strength his mandate gives him license to run a highly Presidential, centralised Commission along the lines of his predecessor, José Manuel Barroso? Will Juncker continue to seek a modest and supportive role for the Commission (as Barroso did), or will his Commission embrace more ambitious new projects or seek to re-energise old ones? What effect will British opposition to Juncker’s appointment have on the United Kingdom’s efforts to renegotiate its status in the EU? The paper draws on a round of interviews with senior Commission officials conducted in early 2015 to try to identify patterns of both continuity and change in the Commission. Its central aim is to assess the meaning of answers to the questions posed above both for the Commission and EU as a whole in the remainder of the decade. What follows is the proverbial ‘thought piece’: an analysis that seeks to provoke debate and pose the right questions about its subject, as opposed to one that offers many answers.
    [Show full text]
  • Uef-Spinelli Group
    UEF-SPINELLI GROUP MANIFESTO 9 MAY 2021 At watershed moments in history, communities need to adapt their institutions to avoid sliding into irreversible decline, thus equipping themselves to govern new circumstances. After the end of the Cold War the European Union, with the creation of the monetary Union, took a first crucial step towards adapting its institutions; but it was unable to agree on a true fiscal and social policy for the Euro. Later, the Lisbon Treaty strengthened the legislative role of the European Parliament, but again failed to create a strong economic and political union in order to complete the Euro. Resulting from that, the EU was not equipped to react effectively to the first major challenges and crises of the XXI century: the financial crash of 2008, the migration flows of 2015- 2016, the rise of national populism, and the 2016 Brexit referendum. This failure also resulted in a strengthening of the role of national governments — as shown, for example, by the current excessive concentration of power within the European Council, whose actions are blocked by opposing national vetoes —, and in the EU’s chronic inability to develop a common foreign policy capable of promoting Europe’s common strategic interests. Now, however, the tune has changed. In the face of an unprecedented public health crisis and the corresponding collapse of its economies, Europe has reacted with unity and resolve, indicating the way forward for the future of European integration: it laid the foundations by starting with an unprecedented common vaccination strategy, for a “Europe of Health”, and unveiled a recovery plan which will be financed by shared borrowing and repaid by revenue from new EU taxes levied on the digital and financial giants and on polluting industries.
    [Show full text]
  • S&D Group Elects New Bureau and Stands United Behind Gianni Pittella
    S&D Group elects new Bureau and stands united behind Gianni Pittella as S&D candidate for EP president TUTTLIES, Utta 15/12/2016 Share it Following the re-election of Gianni Pittella last week as president of the S&D Group for the second half of the European Parliament mandate, the S&D Group elected its new Bureau yesterday evening in Strasbourg. The S&D Group's Bureau co-ordinates its political activity and is made up of the president, nine vice-presidents and the treasurer. Vice- presidents are in charge of specific EU policy portfolios and supervise cross-committee issues. Two others are responsible for the S&D Group's communications and for the co-ordination of parliamentary affairs. Commenting on the new Bureau, S&D Group president Gianni Pittella said: “In politically turbulent times, it is fundamental to have a strong and efficient team with whom together we can fight for a fairer Europe. “I am proud to be the president of our newly-elected Bureau. This Bureau reflects the values we stand for - a strong representation of women in leading positions, a clear geographical balance between East and West, North and South, as well as a fair representation of small and large member states. “Over the last weeks our group has taken decisive steps and we are now ready for the mid-term review. With a strong and cohesive backing from our group, I will continue my campaign, together with all democratic and pro-European forces, to be elected as next EP president on 17 January 2017.” The new S&D Group Bureau has 11 members, including the S&D Group president Gianni Pittella (MEP Italy), the treasurer Péter Niedermüller (MEP Hungary), and the following nine vice-presidents: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • IEEE Bulletin January 2017 Energy
    IEEE Bulletin January 2017 Energy AT A GLANCE :: TAJANI PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT – COAL DOWN, RENEWABLES UP? – INNOVATION AND RESEARCH ROADMAP ON ENERGY TRANSITION EDITION CONTENT: European Parliament: Energy Efficiency: Electricity • Tajani elected as president of the • JRC report: Assessment of the first • EU electricity market design proposals European Parliament National Energy Efficiency Action Plans under the spotlight at Abu Dhabi Energy: under the Energy Efficiency Directive workshop • UK seeks clean energy collaboration as • Energy efficiency more cost-effective Renewables hard Brexit looms than estimated in the updated EC impact • Lower investment costs cannot deliver • EU power emissions down as coal assessment renewables alone declines – report • Energy Performance of Buildings ETS • Innovation and research roadmap for Directive: rapporteur known • February Council deal on ETS ‘unlikely’ energy transition published EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Ironically, his style of presidency may suit some of his loudest critics. Philippe Lamberts, co-president of the Greens, argued that Martin Schulz Tajani elected as president of the had in fact weakened the Parliament by submitting it to the will of the European Parliament Commission and European Council. He claimed that under Schulz it had taken less risks on legislation and the budget. These allegations echo the words of Pittella who is looking for clear blue water between the S&D and EPP and the bad blood between the two groups could herald a new era of uncertainty in the Parliament. ENERGY UK seeks clean energy collaboration as hard Brexit looms UK Prime Minister Theresa May said that clean energy collaboration will be one of the UK’s key priorities in negotiating a ‘hard’ Brexit, but wider environmental protection will not.
    [Show full text]
  • Post DIGITAL REVOLUTION for the Many, Not for the Few
    10 # # The 10 WINTER 2018-2019 3.00 € Progressive Post DIGITAL REVOLUTION for the many, not for the few SPECIAL COVERAGE #EP2019 How could the Left recover? NEXT DEMOCRACY NEXT GLOBAL NEXT SOCIAL Baby-boomers vs Millennials Bolsonaro, the Left Social housing: back on and Europe the progressive agenda NEXT ECONOMY NEXT LEFT NEXT ENVIRONMENT FOLLOW UP End of Quantitative easing - Culture to rebuild Free public transport Global Compact for Safe, Scenarios for the real economy faith in democracy everywhere Orderly and Regular Migration Quarterly : December - January - February www.progressivepost.eu ProgressiveThe Post Europeans share a common history and future, but their ideas and ideals still need a public space. The Progressive Post The truly European progressive opinion magazine that gathers world-renowned experts, to offer a platform informing the public about the issues facing Europe today. The Progressive Post The magazine is published in two languages: English and French. We’ve got also partnerships with The Fabian Review (UK) and TEMAS (ES) Progressivepost.eu + @FEPS-Europe Daily analysis and opinion to supplement the print edition With the support of the European Parliament PUBLICATION DIRECTOR Ernst Stetter EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Alain Bloëdt EDITORS Karine Jehelmann, Olaf Bruns EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Ania Skrzypek, David Rinaldi, Vassilis Ntousas, Maria Freitas, Hedwig Giusto, Charlotte Billingham, Lisa Kastner, Laeticia Thissen, Justin Nogarède TRANSLATORS Ben O'Donovan, Amandine Gillet, Françoise Hoffelinck, Eurideas Language Experts PROOFREADING Louise Hanzlik, Stéphanie Bessalem COORDINATION & GRAPHIC DESIGN www.triptyque.be PHOTO CREDITS Shutterstock, The EU’s Audiovisual Media Services COVER ILLUSTRATION Peter Willems - Vec-Star COPYRIGHT © FEPS – Foundation for European Progressive Studies N°10 - Winter 2018 - 19 ISSN 2506-7362 EDITORIAL Digital: revolution without revolt by Maria Joao Rodrigues, FEPS President This edition focuses on the digital revolution.
    [Show full text]