Spirituality — the Psyche Or the Soul?
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Palliative and Supportive Care (2014), 12, 91–94. # Cambridge University Press, 2014 1478-9515/14 $20.00 doi:10.1017/S1478951514000303 FROM THE EDITOR Spirituality — The psyche or the soul? The Divine Spirit hovered upon the surface of the Well-Being — 12-item Scale (FACIT-sp-12), used in water many articles, proffers little insight in exploring Genesis, 1:2 spirituality (Cella, 2010). It is based on circular ques- tions, and merely confirms that “meaning, purpose, peace, and calm” are important to people. The items The medical literature is conflicted and uncertain include the following (Cella, 2010): “Below is a list of when discussing spirituality. “Spiritual” was once 12 statements that other people with your illness clearly understood when religion was widely accepted have said are important. Please circle or mark one in the West and the existence of the soul was assumed. number (from 0–4) per statement to indicate your re- (Harper, 2011;Egan,2011) The medical literature sponse as it applies to the past seven days: “I feel today does not refer to the classical concept of spiri- peaceful; I have a reason for living; My life has tuality. One has a sense that modern medicine is been productive; I have trouble feeling peace of embarrassed by concepts such as the soul and immor- mind; I feel a sense of purpose in my life; I am able tality. However, in recent years the palliative care, to reach down deep into myself for comfort; I feel a psycho-oncology, and (even) oncology literatures sense of harmony within myself; My life lacks mean- have re-explored the spiritual concept, albeit in a secu- ing and purpose; I find comfort in my faith or spiri- lar guise. The results are in my opinion disappointing. tual beliefs; I find strength in my faith or spiritual Salander (2006) vigorously critiqued the academic beliefs; My illness has strengthened my faith or spiri- use of the word spiritual and pointed out serial misu- tual beliefs; I know that whatever happens with my ses in the literature. He objected to spiritual being illness, things will be okay.” conflated with the concepts religion, meaning, and What does an objective measure of “spiritual” existential (and one might add emotion, psychology, measure when it asks in 25% of the questions: are and hope). Furthermore, Salander challenges (cor- you spiritual? The fact that it has been validated rectly in my view) papers that mislabel psychosocial does not convince that its intellectual provenance is issues as spiritual ones. He noted that the concept valid. There is really no room in academic discussion of “spirituality” as currently portrayed in the litera- to avoid a definition. Sometimes there is a set of ture has no theoretical basis (presumably in the ab- characteristics that have not coalesced sufficiently, sence of the concept of the soul) and can mean in order to achieve the high degree of integrity re- many things to many people. quired to be labeled a definition. Sometimes we It is probable that the medical literature is chan- have to be pragmatic and make do with a “good en- ging the use and meaning of the word “spiritual” in ough” set of descriptors as supported by the evidence. response to changing culture. However, is it a mistake The FACIT-sp-12 does not replace a definition, nor is to reject the phenomenon that the original meaning it “good enough.” of the word described, namely the spiritual experi- The Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association ence associated with religiousness, mysticism, and defines spirituality as: “An existential construct in- the soul? Has the original spiritual experience associ- clusive of all the ways in which a person makes mean- ated with the soul vacated the human condition? ing and organizes his/her sense of self around a personal set of beliefs, values and relationships. This is sometimes understood in terms of transcen- DEFINITIONS OF SPIRITUALITY dence or inspiration. Involvement in a community Commentators pay lip service to distinguishing be- of faith and practice may or may not be a part of an tween spirituality and emotions. The Functional As- individual’s spirituality” (Canada Hospice Associ- sessment of Chronic Illness Therapy — Spiritual ation, 2004). Another palliative care definition states: 91 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.22, on 29 Sep 2021 at 03:25:38, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951514000303 92 From the Editor “Spirituality ...moves the individual towards knowl- AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON edge, love, meaning, peace, hope, transcendence, SPIRITUALITY connectedness, compassion, wellness and whole- Spirituality today is orphaned between the brain ness ... It is an innate tendency toward meaning — and God — I shall explain. But before that, I suggest it is expressed in an individual’s search for ultimate that the main problem today, is not so much separa- meaning through participation in religion and/or ting spiritual from religious, but rather distin- belief in God, family,naturalism, rationalism, human- guishing spiritual from emotional since there are ism, and the arts” (Bryson, 2004). Clinical chaplains overlapping features. suggest: “Spirituality is my being: my inner person. It is who I am — unique and alive. It is my body, my thinking, my feelings, my judgments, and my creativ- Brain ity. My spirituality motivates me to choose meaning- Much work has been done on the nature of conscious- ful relationships and pursuits (Harper, 2011).” A ness. It is still poorly understood in neuro-chemical United States national conference used a consensus and neuro-anatomical terms. For example, it is not process to formalize the definition of spirituality: understood how anesthetic agents render uncon- “(Spirituality) is the aspect of humanity that refers sciousness (Mashour, 2005). Nor is there an under- to the way individuals seek and express meaning standing how, if one particular area of the brain and purpose and the way they experience their con- “lights up,” suddenly the whole brain can experience nectedness to the moment, to self, to others, to nature, a unified awareness (Greenfield, 1998). However, and to the significant or sacred” (Puchalski, 2009). there is a consensus among researchers about two Rodin’s group in Toronto (Lo, 2011) concluded a things, albeit related. First, that the mind is the brain. longitudinal study of spirituality in 747 advanced That is, the mind, i.e., consciousness, is due solely to cancer patients over eight years, by stating “we the brain’s neurophysiology, and when the brain cea- have demonstrated that spiritual well-being is sup- ses, the mind ceases (Denton, 2005). The second point ported not only by religious belief systems, but also of agreement in the consciousness literature is that by self-worth and the sense of connection with oth- there is no independent soul or spirit that animates ers, and is disrupted by physical suffering.” And: the brain. Since there is no spiritual entity separate that “spiritual well-being has come to be regarded from the brain, all thoughts and psychological activi- as a psychological outcome indicating the extent to ties that we are aware of, are due only to the activity which individuals are at peace with themselves, of the brain’s neuro-transmitters. Thus, in the ab- feel their lives have meaning and purpose, and derive sence of the soul, the challenge is to distinguish comfort from their beliefs in the face of suffering.” what we mean by spiritual and what by emotional, From New Zealand a comprehensive article gave an keeping in mind (as it were) that both are products honest if ultimately confusing definition: “Spiritual- of the brain and its neuro-transmitters. ity means different things to different people. It may include (a search for): one’s ultimate beliefs God and values; a sense of meaning and purpose in life; a sense of connectedness; identity and awareness; People who believe in a biblical version of the creation and for some people, religion. It may be understood of man subscribe to the model that there is a separate at an individual or population level” (Egan, 2001). entity which resides in the body called the soul (cre- Spirituality according to these authors incorpor- ated by God) which animates the person and is the ates many aspects of human psychology. These defi- source of spirituality, including character and person- nitions ultimately fail because they are imprecise ality.The soul, being indestructible, outlives the death and over-inclusive. Many of the words overlap one of the brain and returns to its Maker. This model tends another conceptually and are unhelpful in identify- to equate consciousness (the mind) with the soul. The ing what is unique and characteristic about spiritual. existence of a soul makes for a simpler model of spiri- Undefined and vaguely used words (“my being,” tuality. Nevertheless one is still left with the problem “wellness and wholeness,” “naturalism,” “meaning,” of distinguishing phenomenologically between spiri- “in the face of suffering,” “at peace,” “authenticity, tuality and emotions. Today most people (including dignity, and hope”) are un-tested (if not un-testable). spirituality researchers) speak of a “secular” spiritual- Furthermore, they are at risk of discarding the ity and avoid the need to use the “soul” hypothesis. original and still extant phenomenon that spiritual formerly described. The spectrum and imprecision A NEW DEFINITION OF SPIRITUALITY of definitions confirms the absence of a rigorous theoretical base and undoubtedly contributed to I propose a concise definition of secular spirituality Salander’s intellectual dyspepsia. which to be sure includes elements mentioned by Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.33.22, on 29 Sep 2021 at 03:25:38, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.