DOCSLIB.ORG

Satellite List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Satellite List SATELLITE LIST Scanning Sky from 90.0°E going West to 90.0°W My Satellite My Satellite My Satellite Position Position Position Serial # Name Serial # Name Serial # Name 88.0°E ST 1 36.0°E Eutelsat Thor 3 Sesat 87.5°E ChinaStar 1 Intelsat 10- Eutelsat W4 02 85.2°E Intelsat 709 Eurobird 3 Amos 1 Insat 2E 33.0°E 4.0°W 83.0°E Intelsat 802 Amos 2 Insat 3B 31.3°E Türksat 1B Atlantic Bird 5.0°W Express 6A 3 80.0°E 30.5°E Arabsat 2B Express AM 2 Nilesat 101 Eurobird 1 7.0°W Thaicom 2 Nilesat 102 78.5°E Astra 2A Thaicom 3 28.2°E Telecom 2D Astra 2B 76.5°E Telstar 10 8.0°W Atlantic Bird Astra 2D 75.0°E LMI 1 2 Arabsat 2C Insat 3C 11.0°W Express 3A 74.0°E 26.0°E Arabsat 3A Atlantic Bird Edusat 12.5°W Arabsat 2D 1 72.0°E PAS 4 Astra 1D 14.0°W Gorizont 32 70.5°E Eutelsat W5 23.5°E Astra 3A 15.0°W Telstar 12 PAS 7 68.5°E 21.6°E Eutelsat W6 18.0°W Intelsat 901 PAS 10 21.0°E AfriStar 20.0°W Intelsat 603 66.0°E Intelsat 704 Astra 1C 22.0°W NSS 7 64.0°E Intelsat 906 Astra 1E 24.5°W Intelsat 905 62.0°E Intelsat 902 Astra 1F 27.5°W Intelsat 907 60.0°E Intelsat 904 19.2°E Astra 1G Hispasat 1C 57.0°E NSS 703 30.0°W Astra 1H Hispasat 1D 56.0°E Bonum 1 Astra 2C 31.5°W Intelsat 801 Insat 3E 55.0°E 16.0°E Eutelsat W2 34.5°W Intelsat 903 Intelsat 702 Hot Bird 1 AMC 12 Express AM 37.5°W 53.0°E 22 Hot Bird 2 Telstar 11 49.0°E Yamal 202 13.0°E Hot Bird 3 40.5°W NSS 806 45.0°E PAS 12 Hot Bird 4 PAS 6B 43.0°W 42.5°E NewSat 1 Hot Bird 6 PAS 3R Türksat 1C 10.0°E Eutelsat W1 45.0°W PAS 1R 42.0°E Eurasiasat 1 7.0°E Eutelsat W3A 50.0°W Intelsat 705 Express A1R Sirius 3 53.0°W Intelsat 707 40.0°E 5.0°E Express AM 1 Sirius 2 55.5°W Intelsat 805 39.0°E Hellas Sat 2 3.0°E Telecom 2A 58.0°W PAS 9 38.0°E Paksat 1 1.0°W Thor 2 61.0°W Amazonas My Satellite My Satellite My Satellite Position Position Position Serial # Name Serial # Name Serial # Name EchoStar 3 105.0°W AMC 15 150.0°E JCSAT 1B 61.5°W Rainbow 1 107.3°W Anik F1 148.0°E Measat 2 Estrela do Sul DirecTV 6 146.0°E Agila 2 63.0°W 1 110.0°W EchoStar 6 145.0°E Gorizont 33 65.0°W Brasilsat B2 EchoStar 8 144.0°E Superbird C 67.0°W Anik E2 111.1°W Anik F2 140.0°E Gorizont 31 70.0°W Brasilsat B1 113.0°W Solidaridad 2 Express AM 3 Nahuel 1 138.5°E (moving 72.0°W 115.0°W XM Rock 0.9°E/day) AMC 6 116.8°W SatMex 5 138.0°E Telstar 18 72.5°W DirecTV 5 EchoStar 7 136.0°E N-Star B 74.0°W SBS 6 119.0°W DirecTV 7S 134.0°E Apstar 1A 77.0°W EchoStar 4 EchoStar 9 134.0°E Apstar 6 79.0°W AMC 5 121.0°W Intelsat 132.0°E N-Star A 82.0°W Nimiq 2 Americas 13 128.0°E JCSAT 3 83.0°W AMC 9 123.0°W Galaxy 10R 124.0°E JCSAT 4A 84.0°W Brasilsat B3 125.0°W Galaxy 12 122.2°E AsiaSat 4 85.0°W AMC 16 Galaxy 13 127.0°W 120.0°E Thaicom 1A 85.1°W XM 3 Horizons 1 118.0°E Palapa B4 87.0°W AMC 3 129.0°W EchoStar 5 116.0°E Koreasat 3 AMC 2 Intelsat 129.0°W 88.0°W (moving Americas 7 Palapa C2 0.7°E/day) 113.0°E 131.0°W AMC 11 Koreasat 2 Intelsat 89.0°W Americas 8 133.0°W Galaxy 1R 110.5°E Sinosat 1 (testing) 135.0°W AMC 10 BSAT 1A Galaxy 11 137.0°W AMC 7 110.0°E BSAT 2A 91.0°W Nimiq 1 139.0°W AMC 8 N-Sat 110 Nimiq 3 EchoStar 1 Worldsat 1 148.0°W 108.0°E 92.0°W Brasilsat B4 EchoStar 2 Telkom 1 Intelsat 93.0°W … … 107.7°E Cakrawarta 1 Americas 6 177.0°W NSS 5 105.5°E AsiaSat 3S 95.0°W Galaxy 3C 180.0°E Intelsat 701 105.0°E AsiaStar Intelsat 97.0°W Americas 5 169.0°E PAS 2 100.5°E AsiaSat 2 166.0°E PAS 8 Express AM 99.0°W Galaxy 4R 96.5°E 11 DirecTV 1 164.0°E Optus A3 95.0°E NSS 6 99.0°W (moving 162.0°E Superbird B2 1.0°E/day) 93.5°E Insat 3A 160.0°E Optus B1 DirecTV 91.5°E Measat 1 101.0°W 1R/2/4S 158.0°E Superbird A 90.0°E Yamal 201 AMC 4 156.0°E Optus C1 - as in Sunday, July 24, 2005 101.0°W DirecTV 8 154.0°E JCSAT 2A By: 103.0°W AMC 1 152.0°E Optus B3 EveryScreen.com/tv/.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ead.Indb 1 2/8/2011 15:44:45 Ead.Indb 2 2/8/2011 15:44:46 Fredric M
    EaD.indb 1 2/8/2011 15:44:45 EaD.indb 2 2/8/2011 15:44:46 Fredric M. Litto Marcos Formiga Organizadores ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE DIREITOS REPROGRÁFICOS São Paulo Brasil Argentina Colômbia Costa Rica Chile Espanha Guatemala México Peru Porto Rico Venezuela Litto_v2_pIII_IV.inddEaD.indb 3 1 02/04/20142/8/2011 14:38:33 15:44:46 © 2012 by Fredric Michael Litto e Marcos Formiga Todos os direitos reservados. Nenhuma parte desta publicação poderá ser reproduzida ou transmitida de qualquer modo ou por qualquer outro meio, eletrônico ou mecânico, incluindo fotocópia, gravação ou qualquer outro tipo de sistema de armazenamento e transmissão de informação, sem prévia autorização, por escrito, da Pearson Education do Brasil. Diretor editorial: Roger Trimer Gerente editorial: Sabrina Cairo Coordenadora de produção editorial: Thelma Babaoka Editor de desenvolvimento: Jean Xavier Preparação: Olivia Zambone Revisão: Carmen Teresa Simões da Costa Capa: Alexandre Mieda Projeto gráfico e diagramação: Figurativa Editorial MM Ltda.. Dados Internacionais de Catalogação na Publicação (CIP) (Câmara Brasileira do Livro, SP, Brasil) Educação a distância : o estado da arte, volume 2 / Fredric Michael Litto, Marcos Formiga (orgs.). -- 2. ed. -- São Paulo : Pearson Education do Brasil, 2012. vários autores. Bibliografia. ISBN 978-85-7605-883-0 1. Educação a distância - História I. Litto, Fredric Michael. II. Formiga, Marcos. 11-02298 CDD-371.309 Índice para catálogo sistemático: 1. Educação a distância : História 371.309 a 2011 12a reimpressãoreimpressão –– novembro
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Systems
    Chapter 18 REST-OF-WORLD (ROW) SATELLITE SYSTEMS For the longest time, space exploration was an exclusive club comprised of only two members, the United States and the Former Soviet Union. That has now changed due to a number of factors, among the more dominant being economics, advanced and improved technologies and national imperatives. Today, the number of nations with space programs has risen to over 40 and will continue to grow as the costs of spacelift and technology continue to decrease. RUSSIAN SATELLITE SYSTEMS The satellite section of the Russian In the post-Soviet era, Russia contin- space program continues to be predomi- ues its efforts to improve both its military nantly government in character, with and commercial space capabilities. most satellites dedicated either to civil/ These enhancements encompass both military applications (such as communi- orbital assets and ground-based space cations and meteorology) or exclusive support facilities. Russia has done some military missions (such as reconnaissance restructuring of its operating principles and targeting). A large portion of the regarding space. While these efforts have Russian space program is kept running by attempted not to detract from space-based launch services, boosters and launch support to military missions, economic sites, paid for by foreign commercial issues and costs have lead to a lowering companies. of Russian space-based capabilities in The most obvious change in Russian both orbital assets and ground station space activity in recent years has been the capabilities. decrease in space launches and corre- The influence of Glasnost on Russia's sponding payloads. Many of these space programs has been significant, but launches are for foreign payloads, not public announcements regarding space Russian.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Geosynchronous Objects Issue 12
    EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY EUROPEAN SPACE OPERATIONS CENTRE GROUND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Space Debris Office CLASSIFICATION OF GEOSYNCHRONOUS OBJECTS ISSUE 12 by R. Choc and R. Jehn Produced with the DISCOS Database February 2010 ESOC Robert-Bosch-Str. 5, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany 3 Abstract This is a status report on geosynchronous objects as of the end of 2009. Based on orbital data in ESA’s DISCOS database and on orbital data provided by KIAM the situation near the geostationary ring (here defined as orbits with mean motion between 0.9 and 1.1 revolutions per day, eccentricity smaller than 0.2 and inclination below 30 deg) is analysed. From 1161 objects for which orbital data are available, 391 are controlled inside their longitude slots, 594 are drifting above, below or through GEO, 169 are in a libration orbit and 7 whose status could not be determined. Furthermore, there are 77 uncontrolled objects without orbital data (of which 66 have not been catalogued). Thus the total number of known objects in the geostationary region is 1238. During 2009 twenty-one spacecraft reached end-of-life. Eleven of them were reorbited following the IADC recommendations, one spacecraft was reorbited with a perigee of 225 km - it is not yet clear if it will enter the 200-km protected zone around GEO or not -, six spacecraft were reorbited too low and three spacecraft did not or could not make any reorbiting manouevre at all and are now librating inside the geostationary ring. If you detect any error or if you have any comment or question please contact R¨udiger Jehn European Space Operations Center Robert-Bosch-Str.
    [Show full text]
  • Turksat 1C Coverage Area Was Enlarged by Two Big Zones Different from Turksat 1B Coverage Areas
    Uydu Haberleşme Dr. Cahit Karakuş 2018 - Istanbul Uydu Haberleşme Sistemleri Haberleşme sistemlerine genel bir bakış • Geniş band iletim ortamı - Fiber Kablo: E1 / E3 , STM-1 / STM-256 , DWDM - Telsiz: Wi-Max, WCDMA - Uydu • Bilgi transfer hızı ve güvenliği Haberleşme Sektörü IP Tabanında Birleşti Bilgisayar Kitle İletişim Araçları • Internet erişim • TV / Radyo / Veri dağıtım • Intranet erişim/ERP Hareketlilik • Radyo / TV yayın, Basım • E-mail Yüksek Hız • VHF ve UHF radio • E- Eğitim servisler • Eğlence • E- Ticaret • Multimedia bilgisi information IPIP Hareketlilik Bireysel servisler Hareketlilik Geniş bant Telekomünikasyon servisler • Hareketlilik • Internet üzerinden telefon görüşmesi IP • Devre anahtarlamadan paket anahtarlamaya GW network GW • Geniş bant veri Uydu Teknolojisi • Satellite access equipment Antenna, PA, LNB, Connector, Cable, Wavequide • Positioning • Operating frequencies • Service models • Standards 5 Uydu Pozisyonları • GEO (Geosynchronous Earth Orbit, altitude >36.000km, >120ms 1-way delay, 33% footprint) • MEO (Medium Earth Orbit, altitude 5.000-10.000km, 15-30ms 1-way delay, ILS) • LEO (Low Earth Orbit, altitude 300-3.000km, 1-10ms 1-way delay, ILS) (ILS: Instrument Landing System) • Higher altitude means higher – round-trip-delay – launching cost – satellite lifetime and size – footprint/coverage – bit-error-rate (BER) and signal attenuation – need for transmission power 6 Uydu Çeşitleri o Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) o yaklaşık 36000 km o Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) 5000-10000 km Low Earth Orbit (LEO) 200-3000 km 7/29 LEO • Circular Low Earth Orbit (LEO) • The altitude of the satellite is constant and equals to several hundreds of kilometres. • The period is of the order of one and half hours. • The orbit is nearly 90o inclination, which guarantees that the satellite will pass over every region of the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts
    2010 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts May 2010 FAA Commercial Space Transportation (AST) and the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) HQ-101151.INDD 2010 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts About the Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA/AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 49 United States Code, Subtitle IX, Chapter 701 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA/AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA/AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA/AST’s web site at http://ast.faa.gov. Cover: Art by John Sloan (2010) NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. • i • Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation Table of Contents Executive Summary . 1 Introduction . 4 About the CoMStAC GSo Forecast . .4 About the FAA NGSo Forecast . .4 ChAracteriStics oF the CommerCiAl Space transportAtioN MArket . .5 Demand ForecastS . .5 COMSTAC 2010 Commercial Geosynchronous Orbit (GSO) Launch Demand Forecast . 7 exeCutive Summary . .7 BackGround . .9 Forecast MethoDoloGy . .9 CoMStAC CommerCiAl GSo Launch Demand Forecast reSultS .
    [Show full text]
  • Spectrum and the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry Prepared by Strand Consulting on Behalf of the Satellite Industry Association1
    Spectrum & the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry Spectrum and the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry Prepared by Strand Consulting on behalf of the Satellite Industry Association1 1 AT&T, a member of SIA, does not necessarily endorse all conclusions of this study. Page 1 of 75 Spectrum & the Technological Transformation of the Satellite Industry 1. Table of Contents 1. Table of Contents ................................................................................................ 1 2. Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 4 2.1. What the satellite industry does for the U.S. today ............................................... 4 2.2. What the satellite industry offers going forward ................................................... 4 2.3. Innovation in the satellite industry ........................................................................ 5 3. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 7 3.1. Overview .................................................................................................................. 7 3.2. Spectrum Basics ...................................................................................................... 8 3.3. Satellite Industry Segments .................................................................................... 9 3.3.1. Satellite Communications ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Update of the Space and Launch Insurance Industry
    Commercial Space Transportation QUARTERLY LAUNCH REPORT Special Report: Update of the Space and Launch Insurance Industry 4th Quarter 1998 United States Department of Transportation • Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation 800 Independence Ave. SW Room 331 Washington, D.C. 20591 Special Report SR-1 Update of the Space and Launch Insurance Industry INTRODUCTION at risk, insurance is essential to mitigate the high cost of a failure. Insurance is a basic requirement for the maintenance of a commercial space industry. Certain types of space insurance, such as Space activity mishaps can result in hundreds third party liability insurance, protect the of millions of dollars of expenses. Two general public from the hazards of space recent launch vehicles that failed (a Titan 4A activity. The U.S. Federal Aviation and the initial Delta 3) were valued at $1.3 Administration, through the Commercial billion and $225 million respectively Space Launch Act Amendments of 1988, (inclusive of payload). The replacement cost requires third party liability insurance as a of the recently failed Galaxy 4 satellite, for condition for the issuance of a commercial example, was in the range of $200 to $250 launch license. Under the 1972 United million. In addition, consequences of Nations Convention on International Liability mishaps will typically extend beyond the cost for Damage Caused by Space Objects, of a satellite and launch vehicle. Business governments are liable for injury or damage operations can be delayed, possibly resulting to third parties, caused by launch vehicles or in the deferral of a satellite venture’s vital payloads launched under their jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • A B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
    A B 1 Name of Satellite, Alternate Names Country of Operator/Owner 2 AcrimSat (Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor) USA 3 Afristar USA 4 Agila 2 (Mabuhay 1) Philippines 5 Akebono (EXOS-D) Japan 6 ALOS (Advanced Land Observing Satellite; Daichi) Japan 7 Alsat-1 Algeria 8 Amazonas Brazil 9 AMC-1 (Americom 1, GE-1) USA 10 AMC-10 (Americom-10, GE 10) USA 11 AMC-11 (Americom-11, GE 11) USA 12 AMC-12 (Americom 12, Worldsat 2) USA 13 AMC-15 (Americom-15) USA 14 AMC-16 (Americom-16) USA 15 AMC-18 (Americom 18) USA 16 AMC-2 (Americom 2, GE-2) USA 17 AMC-23 (Worldsat 3) USA 18 AMC-3 (Americom 3, GE-3) USA 19 AMC-4 (Americom-4, GE-4) USA 20 AMC-5 (Americom-5, GE-5) USA 21 AMC-6 (Americom-6, GE-6) USA 22 AMC-7 (Americom-7, GE-7) USA 23 AMC-8 (Americom-8, GE-8, Aurora 3) USA 24 AMC-9 (Americom 9) USA 25 Amos 1 Israel 26 Amos 2 Israel 27 Amsat-Echo (Oscar 51, AO-51) USA 28 Amsat-Oscar 7 (AO-7) USA 29 Anik F1 Canada 30 Anik F1R Canada 31 Anik F2 Canada 32 Apstar 1 China (PR) 33 Apstar 1A (Apstar 3) China (PR) 34 Apstar 2R (Telstar 10) China (PR) 35 Apstar 6 China (PR) C D 1 Operator/Owner Users 2 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Government 3 WorldSpace Corp. Commercial 4 Mabuhay Philippines Satellite Corp. Commercial 5 Institute of Space and Aeronautical Science, University of Tokyo Civilian Research 6 Earth Observation Research and Application Center/JAXA Japan 7 Centre National des Techniques Spatiales (CNTS) Government 8 Hispamar (subsidiary of Hispasat - Spain) Commercial 9 SES Americom (SES Global) Commercial
    [Show full text]
  • CPA-022-2006 Versão
    Referência: CPA-022-2006 Versão: Status: 1.0 Ativo Data: Natureza: Número de páginas: 29/novembro/2006 Aberto 67 Origem: Revisado por: Aprovado por: Ney de Freitas e Marcos de Alencar – 4Biz Assessoria e GT-01 GT-01 Consultoria Título: Panorama/Diagnóstico de Satélites Desenvolvidos e Operantes ao Longo dos Últimos Cinco Anos e Tendências Futuras Lista de Distribuição Organização Para Cópias INPE Grupos Temáticos, Grupo Gestor, Grupo Orientador e Grupo Consultivo do Planejamento Estratégico Histórico do Documento Versão Alterações 1.0 Estudo elaborado sob contrato junto ao Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos (CGEE). Data: 29/11/2006 Hora: 11:00 Versão: 1.0 Pág: - PLANEJAMENTO ESTRATÉGICO OBJETIVO DO ESTUDO Panorama/Diagnóstico de Satélites Desenvolvidos e Operantes ao Longo dos Últimos Cinco Anos e Tendências Futuras Contratado pelo CGEE – Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos Elaborado por Ney Menandro Garcia de Freitas Marcus Franco Costa de Alencar Outubro 2006 Panorama/Diagnóstico de Satélites Desenvolvidos e Operantes ao Longo dos Últimos Cinco Anos e Tendências Futuras Indice 1. INTRODUÇÃO .................................................................................................................4 2. DEFINIÇÕES....................................................................................................................4 2.1. CRITÉRIOS DE CATEGORIZAÇÃO ............................................................................4 2.2. ABREVIATURAS E SIGLAS........................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • The DIRECTV Group 2003 ANNUAL REPORT
    The DIRECTV Group 2003 ANNUAL REPORT THEDIRECTVGROUP DIRECTV U.S. (100% owned by The DIRECTV Group, Inc.) • Largest digital multi-channel service provider in the U.S. DIRECTV U.S. Cumulative Subscribers with 12.2 million customers as of year-end 2003 ()(Total Platform) 12.2M • Increased revenues 19% to $7.7 billion and operating 11.2M 10.3M profit before depreciation and amortization improved 9.1M 59% to $970 million in 2003 7.7M • Increased owned and operated customer base approximately 13% by adding approximately 1.2 million net new owned and operated customers in 2003 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 - Added over 3 million gross owned and operated sub- scribers in 2003, an all-time record for a single year DIRECTV U.S. Average Monthly Revenue per Customer (ARPU) • Generates the highest average monthly video revenue (Owned and Operated Subscribers) in the U.S. multi-channel entertainment industry with $63.90 $63.90 per customer in 2003, an increase of 7% over 2002 $59.80 $58.70 $57.70 • Broadcasts all of the local channels in 64 top markets, $55.80 representing 72% of U.S. television households as of year-end 2003 - Expects to expand local channel coverage to at least 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 130 top markets representing 92% of U.S. television households during 2004 DIRECTV U.S. Monthly Customer Churn (Owned and Operated Subscribers) • Ranked “#1 in Customer Satisfaction Among Satellite 2.0% 1.8% and Cable TV Subscribers Two Years in a Row” by J.D. 1.7% 1.6% 1.6% Power and Associates 1.5% 1.5% • Distributes over 850 digital video and audio channels, expanding significantly with the expected successful 1.0% launch of the DIRECTV 7S satellite in 2004 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 DIRECTV Latin America (86% owned by The DIRECTV Group, Inc.) • A leading digital multi-channel service provider in Latin THEDIRECTVGROUP America with 1.5 million customers in 28 countries as of year- end 2003 • Emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy process in February 2004 as a more competitive and financially stronger company The DIRECTV Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Technology and Telecommunication" Cluster of the Skolkovo Foundation
    STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS AND PRIORITY AREAS OF DEVELOPMENT FOR "S PACE TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATION " CLUSTER OF THE SKOLKOVO FOUNDATION 2012 Strategic Directions and Priority Areas of Development for "Space Technology and Telecommunication" Cluster of the Skolkovo Foundation The present document describes the results of methodology development and evaluation of strategic directions and priority areas for "Space Technology and Telecommunication" Cluster of the Skolkovo Fund. The first iteration was obtained by ST&T expert group with assistance of leading space R&D institutes using the Federal Space Agency materials. The Strategic Directions will be subsequently specified under the foresight research based on the contract between the Skolkovo Fund and one of the leading R&D and consulting organizations in the field of space activity and its results' commercialization. The Glossary can be found at the end of the document EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: PRIORITIES ST&T Cluster ensures search for, attraction and selection of potential subjects of innovative process in the field of development and target use of spacecrafts operation and diversification of rocket and space industry potential, facilitates their cooperation and provides the environment for full cycle innovation process establishment, based on the Strategic directions and priority areas of development, initially defined by this document and regularly updated considering opinion of sci-tech and business community that is identified in process of foresight procedure. At the moment, the Cluster finds it necessary, along with comprehensive support for innovative activity of the Skolkovo Fund participants and applicants, to focus on proactive implementation of several priority areas which particularly include: Establishing national infrastructure of full cycle microsatellite technology which involves leading universities.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12Th STREET S.W
    PUBLIC NOTICE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 445 12th STREET S.W. WASHINGTON D.C. 20554 News media information 202-418-0500 Fax-On-Demand 202-418-2830; Internet: http://www.fcc.gov (or ftp.fcc.gov) TTY (202) 418-2555 Report No. SES-00933 Wednesday June 6, 2007 SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES RE: SATELLITE RADIO APPLICATIONS ACCEPTED FOR FILING The applications listed herein have been found, upon initial review, to be acceptable for filing. The Commission reserves the right to return any of the applications if, upon further examination, it is determined they are defective and not in conformance with the Commission's Rules and Regulations and its Policies. Final action will not be taken on any of these applications earlier than 30 days following the date of this notice. 47 U.S.C. § 309(b). All applications accepted for filing will be assigned call signs, or other unique station identifiers. However, these assignments are for administrative purposes only and do not in any way prejudice Commission action. SES-ASG-20070504-00554 E E000731 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICENSES, INC. Application for Consent to Assignment Current Licensee: CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICENSES, INC. FROM: CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICENSES, INC. TO: TV Acquisition LLC No. of Station(s) listed: 6 SES-ASG-20070504-00555 E E980346 Citicasters Co. Application for Consent to Assignment Current Licensee: Citicasters Co. FROM: CITICASTERS CO. TO: TV Acquisition LLC No. of Station(s) listed: 1 SES-ASG-20070504-00557 E E030135 Central NY News Inc Application for Consent to Assignment Current Licensee: Central NY News Inc FROM: CENTRAL NY NEWS, INC.
    [Show full text]