Trends in Air Quality in Germany

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Trends in Air Quality in Germany | BACKGROUND | Trends in Air Quality in Germany IMPRINT Date: October 2009 Cover Photo: M. Isler / www.metair.ch Photos: p. 3 W. Opolka p. 4 www.imageafter.com p. 9 UBA / A. Eggert p.14 www.imageafter.com Publisher: Federal Environment Agency Wörlitzer Platz 1 06844 Dessau-Roßlau www.umweltbundesamt.de Edited by: Federal Environment Agency Section II 4.2 „Air quality assessment“ E-Mail: [email protected] Introduction nitrogen dioxide, ozone pollution is highest Air pollution has markedly decreased in the in rural areas. For some years, a trend last 20 years. Through the introduction of towards higher ozone concentrations has filter and flue-gas denitrification systems in been noticeable in urban areas. power plants and industrial installations; and the use of modern catalysts and fuels, In this booklet we describe trends in air considerably fewer pollutants are today re- pollution with particulates, nitrogen dioxide leased into the atmosphere. EU-wide air qua- and ozone, and explain their connection to lity limit values for sulphur dioxide, carbon changes in air pollutant emissions. monoxide, benzene and lead are no longer exceeded in Germany. Air quality is moni- tored at approx. 650 German measuring stations several times a day. In addition to particulate matter (PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and ozone (O3), further pollutants such as organic compounds and heavy metals in PM10 are measured. On their way from the emission source (for example, flue or exhaust) to receptor (humans, flora and fauna), pollutant emissions are subject to atmospheric trans- port and mixing processes as well as chemi- cal reaction. Pollutant concentration in the atmosphere (given, for example, in micro- grams per cubic metre of air) can therefore not be directly deduced from the emitted pollutant quantity (given, for example, in tonnes per year). In principle, however, markedly reduced pollutant emissions give cause to expect that pollutant concentration in the atmosphere will also decrease. We observe, however, that since the beginning of this decade air pollution in Germany through particulates, nitrogen oxide and ozone, despite steadily reduced emissions, no longer shows a clear trend, but is subject rather to mainly interannual fluctuations. The limit values for particulates, which were laid down already in 1999 and are obligatory since 2005, are exceeded in many places in Germany. The same applies for limit values for nitrogen dioxide, which come into force in Germany on 1 January 2010. In urban areas – and, above all, in places affected by heavy traffic – air pollution with particulates and nitrogen dioxide is particularly high. Other than in the case of particulates and 3 Photo: www.imageafter.com Pollution regimes Nitrogen oxides In order to be able to understand spatially NOx is a collective chemical term for nitrogen differentiated trends in air pollution, it is oxides, and comprises nitrogen monoxide necessary to combine concentration values (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) as summa- obtained at individual air quality measuring tion parameter. Nitrogen oxides are mainly stations in such a way that they characterize emitted as nitrogen monoxide. Nitrogen pollution regimes. The rural background oxide is emitted directly, but also formed regime (green area in the diagram) re- indirectly through chemical reactions in the presents areas in which air quality is largely atmosphere. Internal-combustion engines uninfluenced by local emissions. Stations and combustion processes in industry and in this regime thus represent pollution at energy production plants are the main sour- a regional level, also termed regional back- ces of nitrogen oxides. ground. The urban background regime (yellow area in the diagram) is characteristic Based on the year 1995, NOx emissions of all for areas in which measured pollutant con- source categories decreased by 15% by the centrations can be regarded as typical for year 2000. Up to 2007 they sank by a further air quality in cities. The urban background regime characterizes the pollution that arises Of the nitrogen compounds, gaseous nitrogen di- from urban emissions (road traffic, domestic oxide in ambient air has the greatest significance fuel etc.) and the regional background. Ur- for human health. As a strong oxidizing agent it ban traffic regime stations (red peaks in the leads to inflammation of the respiratory tract and diagram) are typically found on roads with aggravates the irritation effect of other air pollu- heavy traffic. The result is a cumulative con- tants. tribution to urban background pollution that arises from direct emissions of road traffic. The time series curves of air quality shown Schematic representation of pollution regimes: in this booklet reflect the trend over time of average concentrations in the respective pol- lution regime. Time series curves are therefo- re not suitable for assessment of compliance or non-compliance with limit values of indivi- dual measuring stations. rural urban urban background background traffic 4 1995 2000 2007 2122 kt 1803 kt 1294 kt Energy industries Residential heating systems Manufacturing industries and construction Commercial / institutional and military combustion Road transportation Industrial processes Other transport Agriculture Figure 1: Percentage share of NOx emissions of source categories in the years 1995, 2000 and 2007. 24 percentage points. If one merely considers The effect of a reduction in NOx emissions emissions from road transportation, it has to can be clearly seen in the trend in annual be observed that here the largest reduction, average NOx concentrations: In the period namely 50%, was achieved. Nevertheless, from 1995 to 2007 they declined in the ur- road transportation still accounts for the ban, traffic-affected pollution regime (Figure largest share (44%) of total nitrogen oxide 2, red curve) and in the urban background emissions. (Figure 2, orange curve). µg/m3 250 200 150 100 50 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 rural background urban background urban traffic Figure 2: Trend in annual mean NOx concentration based on the average of measuring stations in the pollution regimes “rural background“, “urban background“ and “urban traffic“ in the period from 1995 to 2007 (with standard deviation). 5 µg/m 3 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 rural background urban background urban traffic Figure 3: Trend in annual mean NO2 concentration based on the average of measuring stations in the pollution regimes “rural background“ , “urban background“ and “urban traffic“ in the period from 1995 to 2007 (with standard deviation). The trend in NO2 concentrations in the same weather-related influences. period shows, however, that the marked The range of annual mean values of indivi- reduction in NOx emissions since 1995 is not dual measuring stations can be estimated on reflected in the state of NO2 pollution the basis of the stated standard deviation. At (Figure 3). Since the year 2000, annual mean the same time, it becomes clear that in the NO2 concentrations have hardly changed in urban traffic pollution regime, annual mean urban areas affected by traffic (Figure 3, red concentrations occur that lie considerably curve) and in the urban background (Figure above the limit value of 40 µg/m3, which will 3, orange curve). Recognizable inter-annual be obligatory from 2010. fluctuations are attributable; above all, to 2001 2002 2003 2004 0-5 µg/m3 > 5 µg/m3 >10 µg/m3 >15 µg/m3 2005 2006 2007 2008 >20 µg/m3 >25 µg/m3 >30 µg/m3 >35 µg/m3 >40 µg/m3 >44 µg/m3 >45 µg/m3 >50 µg/m3 >55 µg/m3 >60 µg/m3 Figure 4: Average NO2 pollution in Germany in the years 2001 to 2008 with “spots“. 6 µg/m 3 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 rural background urban background urban traffic Figure 5: Trend in annual mean NO concentration based on the average of measuring stations in the pollution regimes “rural background“, “urban background“ and “urban traffic“ in the period 1995 to 2007 (with standard deviation). Average NO2 pollution in Germany demons- Since NO2 concentration in the period under trates a strongly defined slope from urban consideration has shown no reduction since conurbations to rural areas (cf. Figure 4). The 1995, the decline in NOx concentration must share of background pollution amounts to be attributable to declining NO concentra- around 20% in places with high NO2 pol- tion. A declining trend in NO annual mean lution. values since 1995 is easily discernible in the urban background (Figure 5, orange curve) Measurement results obtained in areas influ- and even more so in places affected by heavy enced by roads with heavy traffic are plotted traffic (Figure 5, red curve). as spots, since they characterize local, small-scale pollution and are therefore inappropriate for regional interpolation. Limit values for NO2 and NOX Designation Average period Limit value Point in time, by which the limit value has to be achieved 3 Hourly limit value for the 1 hour 200 µg/m NO2 may 1. January 2010* protection of human health not be exceeded more often than 18 times per calendar year 3 Annual limit value for the Calendar year 40 µg/m NO2 1. January 2010* protection of human health 3 Annual limit value for the Calendar year 30 µg/m NOx 19. July 2001* protection of vegetation * Possible extension of deadline pursuant to EU Directive 2008/50/EC (cf. page 8) 7 Measurements in urban areas affected by Summary: heavy traffic show high NOx concentrations with a high share of NO (Figure 5, red curve), The trend in NO concentrations reflects the since the transport time from tail pipe to the x reduction in NOx emissions. As to NO2, air measuring point is short, compared with the quality has not improved to the extent that reaction time for conversion of NO to NO2.
Recommended publications
  • Air Quality Law
    AVOSETTA MEETING 24TH & 25TH MAY 2019 Country Questionnaire Responses: Air Quality Law 1 1 2 a) 3 4 A sources Reported exceedances Completeness Infringement Prior law of data proceedings No2+PM10 yes yes 2009 (closed) No 2016 (pending) Austria Most below (O3) Real time online reporting Yes 2009 (closed) Only for lead 2018 (pending) Belgium PM- solid fuels, real time online reporting Yes 2015, 2016, 208 (pending) 1991 industry, coal, (including 2019) energy non renewables traffic Czech R Czech NOx traffic NOX and PM Only private exceedances 2016 exceedance of NOx Same as EU are sanctioned if and siting of station k infringement of IPPC (pending) Denmar permit or after adm order. NO2 transport Annual reports Reasoned opinion in 2010, yes PM residential 2013 (PM10), and 2017 (NO2) France 2018 Pending case PM (agriculture) Yes online for 2017 2018 Nox (pending) No (only emission NOX (traffic energy) Legal change (driving setting approach) prohibitions are now disproportional when AQS Germany are almost meet) weakens standards and EC did nothing Energy, industry, Annual reports Not available in 2019 No (?) heating, agriculture Daily online real time (Q8) PM Greece PM (residential Reports Automated data Yes still pending Yes? heating) and NOx Mostly compliance are transparent (traffic) Manual monitoring does not represent Hungary the real problmes 1 excedence in EPA reports no yes 2009 NOx Exceedences of WHO PM, NOx, O3 Ireland Ilegal agricultural burning PM2,5 and NOx Accessible in yearly 2018 PM10 Yes (mere reports 2017 NO2 transposition)
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Air – Made in Germany Low Emission Zones → Page 29 Komodo → Page 38 Berlin Hanover
    WWW.GERMAN-SUSTAINABLE-MOBILITY.DE Clean Air – Made in Germany Low emission zones → page 29 KoMoDo → page 38 Berlin Hanover Dessau Menden Wuppertal Dresden Cologne CarGoTram → page 40 Fuel Cell-Hybrids buses → page 46 Karlsruhe Freiburg Radolfzell Haldenwang For more information about our GPSM partners as well as events, job vacancies and education opportunities related to sustainable mobility, please visit our interactive map: https://www.german-sustainable-mobility.de/gpsm-web-tool/ CLEAN AIR – MADE IN GERMANY 3 Table of Contents 1.0 POLICIES FOR HEALTHY ENVIRONMENTS: CLEAN AIR REQUIRES SOUND LEGAL FRAMEWORK CONDITIONS 1.1 The German Government‘s Policy → page 08 1.2 Important Policy Instruments for Clean Air → page 09 1.3 Vehicle Emission Standards in Germany and EU → page 10 1.4 The Right for Clean Air → page 11 INTERVIEW with Axel Friedrich: Improving Air Quality – the German Experience → page 12 2.0 CLEAN AIR MANAGEMENT: CLEAN AIR CAN BE PLANNED 2.1 Measurement of Air Pollution → page 17 2.2 Data Base: Current Concentrations of Air Pollutants in Germany → page 18 2.3 Linking Emissions Calculation with Transport Demand Data at Street Level → page 19 2.4 Modelling Air Pollutant and Greenhouse Gas Emissions → page 19 2.5 Modelling Air Pollutant Concentration Levels → page 21 2.6 Air Quality Plans: Planning for Clean Air in Cities → page 22 3.0 TAKING ACTION: EFFECTIVE MEASURES FOR BETTER AIR QUALITY 3.1 Synergies for Sustainable Mobility by Joining Forces Across Cities → page 26 3.2 Low Emission Zones in Germany – the Example of Berlin
    [Show full text]
  • 389 Final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Energy Union Factsheet Germany Ac
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 23.11.2017 SWD(2017) 389 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Energy Union Factsheet Germany Accompanying the document COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE, THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS AND THE EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK Third Report on the State of the Energy Union {COM(2017) 688 final} - {SWD(2017) 384 final} - {SWD(2017) 385 final} - {SWD(2017) 386 final} - {SWD(2017) 387 final} - {SWD(2017) 388 final} - {SWD(2017) 390 final} - {SWD(2017) 391 final} - {SWD(2017) 392 final} - {SWD(2017) 393 final} - {SWD(2017) 394 final} - {SWD(2017) 395 final} - {SWD(2017) 396 final} - {SWD(2017) 397 final} - {SWD(2017) 398 final} - {SWD(2017) 399 final} - {SWD(2017) 401 final} - {SWD(2017) 402 final} - {SWD(2017) 404 final} - {SWD(2017) 405 final} - {SWD(2017) 406 final} - {SWD(2017) 407 final} - {SWD(2017) 408 final} - {SWD(2017) 409 final} - {SWD(2017) 411 final} - {SWD(2017) 412 final} - {SWD(2017) 413 final} - {SWD(2017) 414 final} EN EN Energy Union – Germany Germany Energy Union factsheet1 1. Macro-economic implications of energy activities Energy and transport are key sectors for the overall functioning of the economy as they provide an important input and service to the other sectors of the economy. Together, the activities in these two sectors2 accounted for about 6.3% of the total value added of Germany in 2015. Similarly, their share in total employment was 5.5% of total employment3 in 2015, of which 4.9% in the transport sector and 0.6% in the energy sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Ecological Scarcity Method: Application to Russia and Germany
    Development of the Ecological Scarcity method: Application to Russia and Germany vorgelegt von Dipl.-Ing. Marina Grinberg geb. in Moskau von der Fakultät III Prozesswissenschaften der Technischen Universität Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Ingenieurwissenschaften – Dr.-Ing. – genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Sven-Uwe Geißen Gutachter: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Matthias Finkbeiner Gutachter: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jens Hesselbach Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 05. Mai 2015 Berlin 2015 ii Acknowledgment I would like to express my gratitude to the persons below who made my research successful and supported me during my doctoral study and staying in Germany. First of all, I would like express my special appreciation and thanks to my supervisor, Prof. Dr. Matthias Finkbeiner, for his vital support and assistance, enduring guidance and mentorship he provided to me. I would especially like to thank my additional supervisors, Dr. Julia Martinez Blanco, whose help and friendly attitude at every point during my research made it possible to achieve the goal, and Dr. Robert Ackermann, for his wise advices and ideas that helped to push my research forward. I would also like to thank Justus Caspers who supported me with German data collection. I would like to thank defense committee members, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Jens Hesselbach and Prof. Dr.-Ing. Sven-Uwe Geißen. I would like to acknowledge DAAD and Siemens for their financial support and assistance, especially staff members of Desk 522, Rebekka Kammler and Irmgard Kasperek. They have not only made my accommodation in Germany easier, but they gave me the chance to meet other scholarship holders and participate in the meetings of the foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 30 June 2021
    United Nations ECE/EB.AIR/GE.1/2021/5−ECE/EB.AIR/WG.1/2021/16 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 30 June 2021 Original: English Economic Commission for Europe Executive Body for the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution Steering Body to the Cooperative Programme for Monitoring and Evaluation of the Long-range Transmission of Air Pollutants in Europe Working Group on Effects Seventh joint session Geneva, 13–16 September 2021 Item 2 (c) of the provisional agenda Progress in activities of the Cooperative Programme for Monitoring and Evaluation of the Long-range Transmission of Air Pollutants in Europe in 2021 and future work: integrated assessment modelling Integrated assessment modelling Report by the Co-Chairs of the Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling GE.21-08874(E) ECE/EB.AIR/GE.1/2021/5 ECE/EB.AIR/WG.1/2021/16 Summary The present report describes the results of the fiftieth meeting of the Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling under the Cooperative Programme for Monitoring and Evaluation of the Long-range Transmission of Air Pollutants in Europe (EMEP) (online, 21–23 April 2021). Based on presentations of scenarios during the meeting, the Task Force discussed and identified several draft answers to the questions raised by the Protocol to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone review groupa and made several additions, including timing of deliverables, that will be included in the next version of the Task Force answers to the review group questions.b The Task Force supported efforts to develop a guidance document on non-technical and structural measures (for example, changes in mobility, diets).
    [Show full text]
  • Second Progress Report on the Energy Transition the Energy of the Future
    Second Progress Report on the Energy Transition The Energy of the Future Reporting Year 2017 – Summary – Imprint Publisher Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy Public Relations Division 11019 Berlin www.bmwi.de Current as at June 2019 Design PRpetuum GmbH, 80801 Munich Image credits Adobe Stock / BillionPhotos.com / Titel Getty AdrianHancu / Titel, Adrian Weinbrecht / S. 8, Apexphotos / S. 46, artpartner-images / S. 14, Bengt Geijerstam / S. 34, Erik Isakson / Titel, gerenme / Titel, Holger Vonderlind / BMWi / S. 56, instamatics / S. 21, Jana Leon / S. 43, Johner Images / S. 23, 31, Monty Rakusen / S. 37, 49, Nattawit Sreerung / S. 33, nbehmans / S. 40, redmal / Titel, Richard Nowitz / Titel, Terry Williams / S. 16, ThomasVogel / S. 18, Twinpix / S. 41, Ute Grabowski/Photothek / S. 27, Watchara Kokram / EyeEm / S. 60, Westend61 / Titel, 25, 28, 59, Yulia-Images / S. 44 Holger Vonderlind / BMWi / Titel iStock ivansmuk / Titel, KangeStudio / S. 53, metamorworks / S. 51, MF3d / Titel Picture Alliance / Prisma/Pulwey Andreas / S. 24 Plainpicture / DEEPOL / Titel You can obtain this and other brochures from: Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, Public Relations Division Email: [email protected] www.bmwi.de Central ordering service: Tel.: +49 30 182 722 72 Fax: +49 30 181 027 227 21 This brochure is published as part of the public relations work of the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. It is distributed free of charge and is not intended for sale. The distribution of this brochure at campaign events or at information stands run by political parties is prohibited, and political party-related information or advertising shall not be inserted in, printed on, or affixed to this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Studies
    Supporting the Fitness Check of the EU Ambient Air Quality Directives (2008/50/EC, 2004/107/EC) Final Report Appendix J: Case Studies Directorate-General for Environment Written by Adriana R. Ilisescu September 2019 [Catalogue number] number] [Catalogue EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG ENVIRONMENT SUPPORTING THE FITNESS CHECK OF THE EU AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DIRECTIVES (2008/50/EC, 2004/107/EC) APPENDIX J CASE STUDIES • Case study Report – Bulgaria • Case study Report – Germany • Case study Report – Ireland • Case study Report – Italy • Case study Report – Slovakia • Case study Report – Spain • Case study Report – Sweden doi: [number] ISBN [number] [Catalogue number] number] [Catalogue EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG ENVIRONMENT SUPPORTING THE FITNESS CHECK OF THE EU AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DIRECTIVES (2008/50/EC, 2004/107/EC) doi: [number] ISBN [number] CASE STUDY REPORT BULGARIA Supporting the Fitness Check of the EU Ambient Air Quality Directives (2008/50/EC, 2004/107/EC) Written Mariya Gancheva March 2019 EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG ENVIRONMENT SUPPORTING THE FITNESS CHECK OF THE EU AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DIRECTIVES (2008/50/EC, 2004/107/EC) Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Background and context 5 2.1 Bulgaria and air quality zone characteristics 5 2.2 Air quality monitoring and air quality 7 2.3 Allocation of responsibility 13 2.4 Legal and policy framework and air quality measures 14 2.5 Information to the public 16 2.6 Use of EU funding for air quality improvements 17 3 Findings 18 3.1 Relevance of the AAQ Directives 18 3.2 Implementation successes 19 3.3 Implementation
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Report 2000 of the German Council of Environmental Advisors
    Environmental Report 2000 of the German Council of Environmental Advisors “Beginning the Next Millenium” - Summary - February 2000 1 The German Council of Environmental Advisors (Environmental Council) Council members (February 2000): Prof. Dr. jur. Eckard Rehbinder, Frankfurt (Chairman) Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Herbert Sukopp, Berlin (Deputy Chairman) Prof. Dr. med. Heidrun Behrendt, München Prof. Dr. rer. pol. Hans-Jürgen Ewers, Berlin Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Reinhard Franz Hüttl, Cottbus Prof. Dr. phil. Martin Jänicke, Berlin Prof. Dr.-Ing. Eberhard Plaßmann, Köln Scientific staff during the time this report was being prepared: DirProf Dr. rer. nat. Hubert Wiggering (Secretary-General), Dipl.-Volksw. Lutz Eichler (Deputy Secretary-General), Dipl.-Geogr. Oliver Bens (Cottbus), Dipl.-Biol. Jörg-Andreas Böttge (Berlin), Dr. rer. nat. Britt Damme, Dr. rer. nat. Helga Dieffenbach-Fries, Dipl.-Geoökologe Michael Hahn, Dipl.- Volksw. Annette Jochem, Dipl.-Pol. Helge Jörgens (Berlin), Dr. rer. nat. László Kacsóh, Dr. rer. nat. Christa Lemmen (München), Dipl.-Volksw. Bettina Mankel (Berlin), Dr. rer. pol. Armin Sandhövel, Ass. jur. Michael Schmalholz, RA Christoph Schmihing (Frankfurt). Administrative and support staff during the time this report was being prepared: Dipl.-Sek. Klara Bastian, Dipl.-Bibl. Ursula Belusa, Jörg Faber, Annelie Gottlieb, Sabine Krestan, Martina Lilla, M.A., Bettina Muntetschiniger, Petra Schäfer, Dipl.-Verwaltungsw. Jutta Schindehütte, Dagmar Schlinke, Gabriele Stellmacher. This report went to press on February 2000. Postal address: Geschäftsstelle des Rates von Sachverständigen für Umweltfragen, Postfach 5528, 65180 Wiesbaden, Germany; tel.: +49/611/754210; fax: +49/611/731269; e-mail: [email protected]; internet: http://www.umweltrat.de. (Translation: Paul Kramer, Ph.D.) 2 Foreword On 10 March 2000, the German Council of Environmental Advisors published its environmental report for 2000 under the title “steps into the new millennium”.
    [Show full text]
  • Format and Structure of a Database on Health and Environmental Impacts of Different Energy Systems for Electricity Generation
    IAEA-TECDOC-645 Format structureand ofdatabasea on health environmentaland impacts of different energy systems for electricity generation t^L^r INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY 2\ The IAEA does not normally maintain stocks of reports in this series. However, microfiche copie f thesso e reportobtainee b n sca d from INIS Clearinghouse International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramerstrasse 5 0 10 x P.OBo . A-1400 Vienna, Austria Orders shoul accompaniee db prepaymeny db f Austriao t n Schillings 100,- in the form of a cheque or in the form of IAEA microfiche service coupons which may be ordered separately from the INIS Clearinghouse. FORMA STRUCTURD TAN DATABASA F EO N EO HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF DIFFERENT ENERGY SYSTEM ELECTRICITR SFO Y GENERATION IAEA, VIENNA, 1992 IAEA-TECDOC-645 ISSN 1011-4289 Printed by the IAEA in Austria April 1992 FOREWORD e environmentaTh healtd an l h impact f differeno s t energy systems, particularly those associated wit generatioe hth electricityf no emergine ar , significans ga t issuer sfo policy formulation in the coming decades. This, together with the emerging need of many countries to define their energy programmes for the next century, has provided the a renewebasi r fo s d interes e comparativth n i t e risk assessmen f differeno t t energy sources, fossil, nuclear, renewables, in order to account for their effects on health and the environment in decision making as an integral part of energy planning. The IAEA, in co-operation with other international organizations, is strengthening its efforts in comparative health and environmental risk assessment for different energy systems, particularly those associated with electricity generation.
    [Show full text]
  • E D C C O M M U N I Q U E E D C C O M M U N I Q
    www.edcnepal.org EE DD CC CC OO MM MM UU NN II QQ UU EE January, 2019 | Issue No. 50 In this EDC conducts EDC visits Energy Welcoming new Member issue 4th AGM Secretary member Updates Editorial Is development process on track ? I t is understood that the development is process, it cannot have overnight expectation and result. But important question that often D R. ATMA RAM G HIMIRE we lack is ‘has the process been in track for development’? This MANAGING DIRECTOR LIBERTY ENERGY COMPANY LTD question becomes relevant for all sectors/segments of an economy. In AN EDC MEMBER ORGANIZATION Nepal, energy sector has compelled us to rethink our processes, policies and actions so as to review challenges that we have been unable to remove, actions that we have been failed to take and initiate/ improve new course of actions so that the sector is development friendly, state machinery and private sector go hand in hand especially 1 EDC COMMUNIQUE back to home www.edcnepal.org hydropower generation, which is one of the most this sector. effective sector to enhance lives of people of Nepal. Current positivity remains power purchase Even with existing situation, gradual agreement in take or pay condition, return of VAT, progress has been made with private sector income tax concession, implementation of generation of hydro-electricity, surpassing by few announced “Urjaa Bikas Niti’ and expectation of more megawatts than Nepal electricity Authority, energy regulatory commission with facilitative and monopoly government body with some regulatory regulatory rights. But the list is very short in rights along with generation and distribution of comparison to existing challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement (PDF)
    April 2019 | Ad hoc statement Clean air Nitrogen oxides and particulate matter in ambient air: Basic principles and recommendations Publishing information Publisher German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina Jägerberg 1, 06108 Halle (Saale), Germany Editing Lilo Berg Media, Berlin Design and typesetting unicommunication.de, Berlin 1st edition ISBN: 978-3-8047-4013-6 Bibliographic information published by the German National Library The German National Library lists this publication in the German National Bibliography. Detailed bibliographic data is available online at http://dnb.d-nb.de. Recommended citation German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina (2019): Clean air. Nitrogen oxides and particulate matter in ambient air: Basic principles and recommendations. Halle (Saale). Cover picture Particulate matter in Germany and adjacent countries. For more information see p. 58. Image: Klaus Klingmüller, MPIC Mainz; after: Van Donkelaar et al., 2016 Clean air Nitrogen oxides and particulate matter in ambient air: Basic principles and recommendations Contents 3 Contents Preliminary remarks ���������������������������������������������������������������� 4 The statement in brief ������������������������������������������������������������� 7 Key declarations and recommendations ��������������������������������� 8 1 The pollutants ����������������������������������������������������������������������� 12 2 Measurements und measuring techniques ���������������������������18 3 Health effects ������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Germany Air Quality Policies This Document Is Based on Research That UNEP Conducted in 2015, in Response to Resolution 7 of the UNEA 1
    Germany Air Quality Policies This document is based on research that UNEP conducted in 2015, in response to Resolution 7 of the UNEA 1. It describes country- level policies that impact air quality. Triple question marks (???) indicate that information for the section couldn’t be found. Please review the information, and provide feedback. A Word version of the template can be provided upon request. Corrections and comments can be emailed to [email protected] and [email protected]. Germany Air Quality Policy Matrix Goals Status Current Policies & Programmes GENERAL Overall situation with respect to air quality in ● Complete harmonization with European Union air quality legislation OVERVIEW the country, including key air quality ● The current standards are contained in the Clean Air for Europe (CAFE) Directive (EP & challenges: CEU, 2008) and the Fourth Daughter Directive (EP & CEU, 2004). ● Stringent limit values and measures to prevent ● These Directives also include rules on how Member States should monitor, assess and emissions from industry, transport and private manage ambient air quality. households have helped to significantly decrease National Air Quality Policy air pollution in Germany compared to previous ● The EU air quality policy has a long term goal of achieving levels of air quality that do not decades. result in unacceptable impacts on, and risks to, human health and the environment." ● However, concentrations of particulate matter and nitrogen oxides still exceed current limit ● European Union air quality policy aims to; values. - Develop and implement appropriate instruments to improve air quality. ● Calculations by the Federal Environment - Control of emissions from mobile sources, through fuel quality improvement, Agency of Germany show that exposure to fine - Promoting and integrating environmental protection requirements into the transport and particles causes about 47,000 premature deaths energy sector are part of these aims.
    [Show full text]