Information Standards Quarterly Winter 2009, Vol 21, Issue 1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Evaluation of an Ontology-Based Knowledge-Management-System
Information Services & Use 25 (2005) 181–195 181 IOS Press Evaluation of an Ontology-based Knowledge-Management-System. A Case Study of Convera RetrievalWare 8.0 1 Oliver Bayer, Stefanie Höhfeld ∗, Frauke Josbächer, Nico Kimm, Ina Kradepohl, Melanie Kwiatkowski, Cornelius Puschmann, Mathias Sabbagh, Nils Werner and Ulrike Vollmer Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Institute of Language and Information, Department of Information Science, Universitaetsstraße 1, D-40225 Duesseldorf, Germany Abstract. With RetrievalWare 8.0TM the American company Convera offers an elaborated software in the range of Information Retrieval, Information Indexing and Knowledge Management. Convera promises the possibility of handling different file for- mats in many different languages. Regarding comparable products one innovation is to be stressed particularly: the possibility of the preparation as well as integration of an ontology. One tool of the software package is useful in order to produce ontologies manually, to process existing ontologies and to import the very. The processing of search results is also to be mentioned. By means of categorization strategies search results can be classified dynamically and presented in personalized representations. This study presents an evaluation of the functions and components of the system. Technological aspects and modes of opera- tion under the surface of Convera RetrievalWare will be analysed, with a focus on the creation of libraries and thesauri, and the problems posed by the integration of an existing thesaurus. Broader aspects such as usability and system ergonomics are integrated in the examination as well. Keywords: Categorization, Convera RetrievalWare, disambiguation, dynamic classification, information indexing, information retrieval, ISO 5964, knowledge management, ontology, user interface, taxonomy, thesaurus 1. -
ZMLUVA Uzatvorená Podľa§ 269 Ods
ZMLUVA uzatvorená podľa§ 269 ods. 2 zákona č. 513/1991 Zb. Obchodný zákonník v znení neskorších predpisov Čl. 1 ZMLUVNÉ STRANY 1 .1 . Objednávateľ : MINISTERSTVO SPRAVODLIVOSTI SR Sídlo: Župné námestie 13, 813 11 Bratislava V zastúpení: JUDr. Ľubomíra Vrobelová – vedúca služobného úradu IČO: 00166073 DIČ: 2020830196 Bankové spojenie: Štátna pokladnica Číslo účtu: (ďalej len „Objednávateľ“) 1 .2 . D odá va t e ľ : He wl e t t - Packard Slovakia, s.r.o. S í d lo : G alv a ni h o 7, 820 02 Bratislava V zastúpení : Ing. Henrieta Kostková, konateľ IČO: 35 785 306 DIČ: SK2020213393 Bankové spojenie: Všeobecná úverová banka, a.s. Číslo účtu: Reg. číslo z Obch. registra: Okresný súd Bratislava I., oddiel Sro, vložka č. 21438/B tel. (+421) – 2 – 5752 5111 fax (+421) – 2 – 5752 5222 e-mail [email protected] (ďalej len „Dodávateľ“) (ďalej spolu len „zmluvné strany“) 1 Čl. 2 P R E A M B U L A 2.1. Zmluvné strany uzatvárajú túto zmluvu ako výsledok súťažného dialógu pre zákazku: „IT služby pre e-justice“ realizovanú podľa zákona č. 25/2006 Z. z. o verejnom obstarávaní a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov v znení neskorších predpisov. 2.2. Zmluvné strany touto zmluvou upravujú základy/podmienky zmluvnej spolupráce v oblasti dodávky hardvéru a licencií (ďalej len „tovary“) a poskytovania služieb, ktoré tvoria predmet tejto zmluvy a podmienky budúceho zadávania a uzatvárania vykonávacích zmlúv. 2.3. Neoddeliteľnú súčasť tejto zmluvy tvoria tieto prílohy : a) Príloha č. 1, ktorá obsahuje výsledný opis predmetu zákazky/zmluvy; b) Príloha č. 2, ktorá obsahuje jednotkové ceny hardvéru a licencií a jednotkové ceny služieb. -
Cen Workshop Agreement Cwa 14871
CEN CWA 14871 WORKSHOP October 2003 AGREEMENT ICS 03.180; 35.060; 35.240.99 English version Controlled Vocabularies for Learning Object Metadata: Typology, impact analysis, guidelines and a web based Vocabularies Registry This CEN Workshop Agreement has been drafted and approved by a Workshop of representatives of interested parties, the constitution of which is indicated in the foreword of this Workshop Agreement. The formal process followed by the Workshop in the development of this Workshop Agreement has been endorsed by the National Members of CEN but neither the National Members of CEN nor the CEN Management Centre can be held accountable for the technical content of this CEN Workshop Agreement or possible conflicts with standards or legislation. This CEN Workshop Agreement can in no way be held as being an official standard developed by CEN and its Members. This CEN Workshop Agreement is publicly available as a reference document from the CEN Members National Standard Bodies. CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom. EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG Management Centre: rue de Stassart, 36 B-1050 Brussels © 2003 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members. Ref. No. CWA 14871:2003 D/E/F -
Evaluation of an Ontology-Based Knowledge- Management-System. a Case Study of Convera Retrievalware 8.0
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/228969390 Evaluation of an ontology-based knowledge- management-system. A case study of Convera RetrievalWare 8.0 ARTICLE in INFORMATION SERVICES & USE · JANUARY 2005 CITATIONS DOWNLOADS VIEWS 2 11 210 10 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Cornelius Puschmann Mathias Sabbagh Zeppelin University Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf 30 PUBLICATIONS 62 CITATIONS 1 PUBLICATION 2 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Available from: Mathias Sabbagh Retrieved on: 22 June 2015 Information Services & Use 25 (2005) 181–195 181 IOS Press Evaluation of an Ontology-based Knowledge-Management-System. A Case Study of Convera RetrievalWare 8.0 1 Oliver Bayer, Stefanie Höhfeld ∗, Frauke Josbächer, Nico Kimm, Ina Kradepohl, Melanie Kwiatkowski, Cornelius Puschmann, Mathias Sabbagh, Nils Werner and Ulrike Vollmer Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Institute of Language and Information, Department of Information Science, Universitaetsstraße 1, D-40225 Duesseldorf, Germany Abstract. With RetrievalWare 8.0TM the American company Convera offers an elaborated software in the range of Information Retrieval, Information Indexing and Knowledge Management. Convera promises the possibility of handling different file for- mats in many different languages. Regarding comparable products one innovation is to be stressed particularly: the possibility of the preparation as well as integration of an ontology. One tool of the software package is useful in order to produce ontologies manually, to process existing ontologies and to import the very. The processing of search results is also to be mentioned. By means of categorization strategies search results can be classified dynamically and presented in personalized representations. This study presents an evaluation of the functions and components of the system. -
Saa Standards Committee, Subgroup, and Liaison Annual Reports 2010
SAA STANDARDS COMMITTEE, SUBGROUP, AND LIAISON ANNUAL REPORTS 2010 Table of Contents Standards Committee 2 Canadian Committee on Archival Description 4 Deaccessioning and Reappraisal Development and Review Team 5 Encoded Archival Context Working Group 7 International Council on Archives 9 National Information Standards Organization 14 Technical Subcommittee on Encoded Archival Description 20 Technical Subcommittee on Facilities Guidelines 21 1 Society of American Archivists Standards Committee Annual Report 2009-2010 Membership Polly Reynolds, Chair (2008-2010) James Cassedy (2008-2011) Kate Colligan (2007-2010) Laura Drake Davis (2009-2012) Chatham Ewing (2008-2011) Cory Nimer (2009-2012) Sibyl Schaefer (2008-2011) Margery Sly, Council Liaison Lisa Carter, Ex Officio Kathleen Dow, Ex Officio Kris Kiesling, Ex Officio Michael Rush, Ex Officio Edward Ryan, Ex Officio Lisa Weber, Ex Officio New Members Cory Nimer, Chair (2010-2012) Marcy Flynn, Chair (2010-2012) Heather Dean (2010-2013) Kathleen Feeney (2010-2013) Dennis Meissner, Council Liaison Completed Projects/Activities The Standards Committee endorsed two proposals for the 2010 Joint Annual Meeting of CoSA, NAGARA, and SAA: ―Learning from our Successes: Revising EAD and Implementing EAC-CPF‖ (Chair: Bill Stockting) and ―Bibliographic Control of Archival Materials: The Impact of Library Standards on Archives‖ (Chair: Cory Nimer) (ACCEPTED) Edited and approved draft charges for the Technical Subcommittee for Encoded Archival Description (EAD) and the Schema Development Team (Development and Review Team). A Standards Committee member was also appointed to recommend individuals to serve on the two subgroups. Submitted comments on DCRM(MSS) Beta 20091025 Area 1 draft (12/11/2009). Submitted comments to DCRM(G) version 4.2 (focused comments on the titles (section1) and physical description (section 5) as these are areas that DACS recommends use of companion standards (12/30/2009). -
Metadata Standards and Metadata Registries: an Overview
METADATA STANDARDS AND METADATA REGISTRIES: AN OVERVIEW Bruce E. Bargmeyer, Environmental Protection Agency, and Daniel W. Gillman, Bureau of Labor Statistics Daniel W. Gillman, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC 20212 [email protected] ABSTRACT Much work is being accomplished in the national and international standards communities to reach consensus on standardizing metadata and registries for organizing that metadata. This work has had a large impact on efforts to build metadata systems in the statistical community. Descriptions of several metadata standards and their importance to statistical agencies are provided. Applications of the standards at the Census Bureau, Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Statistics Canada, and many others are provided as well, with an emphasis on the impact a metadata registry can have in a statistical agency. Standards and registries based on these standards help promote interoperability between organizations, systems, and people. Registries are vehicles for collecting, managing, comparing, reusing, and disseminating the designs, specifications, procedures, and outputs of systems, e.g., statistical surveys. These concepts are explained in the paper. Key Words: Data Quality, Data Management 1. INTRODUCTION Metadata is loosely defined as data about data. Though this definition is cute and easy to remember, it is not very precise. Its strength is in recognizing that metadata is data. As such, metadata can be stored and managed in a database, often called a registry or repository. However, it is impossible to identify metadata just by looking at it. We don't know when data is metadata or just data. Metadata is data that is used to describe other data, so the usage turns it into metadata. -
2021-07-07 Report Date : Cost Centre(S)
Report Date : 2021-09-17 Cost Centre(s) : % LIST OF PUBLISHED STANDARDS Page No : 1 Of 5 Total Count: 67 Committee SANS Date Latest Reaffirmation Review/ Number Number Int Ed Ed Sansified Title Approved Amendment due Revision SABS/TC 046 SANS 438:2005/ISO 999:1996 2 1 Y Information and documentation - Guidelines 2005-10-28 2015-08-27 for the content, organization and presentation of indexes SANS 480:2006/ISO 11108:1996 1 1 Y Information and documentation - Archival 2006-03-24 2025-07-17 paper - Requirements for permanence and durability SANS 531:2007/ISO 4:1997 3 1 Y Information and documentation - Rules for the 2007-05-25 2017-03-16 abbreviation of title words and titles of publications SANS 618:2009/ISO 10324:1997 1 1 Y Information and documentation - Holdings 2009-03-13 2014-03-13 statements - Summary level SANS 690:2007/ISO 690:1987 2 1 Y Documentation - Bibliographic references - 2007-05-25 2012-05-25 Content, form and structure SANS 690-2:2007/ISO 690-2:1997 1 1 Y Information and documentation - Bibliographic 2007-05-25 2012-05-25 references Part 2: Electronic documents or parts thereof SANS 832:2007/ISO 832:1994 2 1 Y Information and documentation - Bibliographic 2007-05-25 2018-01-25 description and references - Rules for the abbreviation of bibliographic terms SANS 1105-1:2010/ISO 10161-1:1997 2 1 Y Information and documentation - Open 2010-10-01 2 I A 2010-10-01 2015-10-01 Systems Interconnection - Interlibrary loan application protocol specification Part 1: Protocol specification SANS 1105-2:2011/ISO 10161-2:1997 1 1 Y Information -
Volume 4, No. 4, April 2013, ISSN 2226-1095
a Volume 4, No. 4, April 2013, ISSN 2226-1095 YOU a #contents #me #me Me ? – Why should I care ? ........................................................................................... 1 Me ? #worldscene ISO Focus+ is published 10 times a year International events and international standardization ............................................... 2 (single issues : July-August, Why should I care ? November-December). #guestinterview It is available in English and French. By you .......................................................................................................................... 3 www.iso.org/isofocus+ You may be wondering why you about them because they are sources need to learn about standards. There’s ISO Update : www.iso.org/isoupdate #you of international best practice no denying they are a good idea, but and can open up doors to global The electronic edition (PDF file) of For you ........................................................................................................................ 8 ISO Focus+ is accessible free of charge it’s the experts’ job to deal with them, markets. on the ISO Website www.iso.org/isofocus+ #fun | Adventure tourism – More excitement, less risk ............................................... 10 right ? Wrong. Standards concern us 3. You should get involved. An annual subscription to the paper edition all. Why ? Because we are the ultimate costs 38 Swiss francs. #fun | Roller-coaster thrills – Amusement for all ages without danger ........................ 12 You have the -
Standards for Digital Records Programs DLM Forum – ERM
Standards for Digital Records Programs ARMA Baltimore, 2007 Eugenia Brumm, Ph.D., CRM, FAI Diane K. Carlisle, CRM DLM Forum – ERM standards listing Please be aware that many standards such as MoReq and ISO 15489 cover many of the below concepts. DLM Forum has listed these standards in the category considered “most relevant” using the structure from AIIM’s ERM training program. This list of standards and resources is not intended to be comprehensive, but provides a substantive overview for further exploration. ERM terminology • Information and documentation — ISO 15489, parts 1 & 2 • ANSI/AIIM TR2-1998, Technical Report for Information and Image Management – Glossary of Document Technologies available from AIIM international • MoReq – Model Requirements for the Management of Electronic Records. Published by the Office for Official Publications of the European Commission, 2002, ISBN 92-894-1290-9. • ISO 12651:1999 Electronic imaging - Vocabulary Creating & capturing records • ISO 12652 Technical report on planning considerations addressing preparation of documents for scanning system • ISO 12653:2000 Electronic Imaging – Test target for black-and-white scanning of office documents • ISO 12033 Electronic imaging - Guidance for selection of document image compression methods • ISO/TS 12022:2001 Electronic imaging – Guidance of document image compression methods • ANSI/AIIM TR15-1997 – Planning Considerations, Addressing Preparation of Documents for Image Capture • ANSI/AIIM TR32-1994 – Paper Forms Design Optimization for Electronic Image Management Classification • ISO 15489 Information and documentation - Records Management. • MoReq - Model Requirements for the Management Of Electronic Records, as published by the European Commission • The Design and Implementation of Record - Keeping Systems (DIRKS) methodology developed by State Records New South Wales and National Archives of Australia. -
Standards Available in Electronic Format (PDF) Page 1
Standards available in electronic format (PDF) October 2019 SANS Number Edition Title SANS 1-2:2013 2 Standard for standards Part 2: Recognition of Standards Development Organizations (SDOs) in South Africa SATS 2:2012 1 The development of normative documents other than South African National Standards SANS 2:2013 7.01 Lead-acid starter batteries (SABS 2) SANS 4:2008 3.03 Locks, latches, and associated furniture for doors (SABS 4) (Domestic Type) SANS 11:2007 1.02 Unplasticized poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC-U) (SABS 11) components for external rainwater systems SANS 13:2008 2.03 Wax polish, solvent-based, for floors and furniture (SABS 13) SANS 14:1994/ISO 49:1994, IDT, Ed. 2 1 Malleable cast iron fittings threaded to ISO 7-1 (SABS ISO 49) SANS 15:2008 2.03 Wax emulsion polish for floors and furniture (SABS 15) SANS 16:2007/ISO/IEC 10116:2006, IDT, Ed. 3 2 Information technology - Security techniques - Modes of operation for an n-bit block cipher SANS 17:2014 1.01 Glass and plastics in furniture SANS 18-1:2003/ISO/IEC 10118-1:2000, IDT, Ed. 2 1 Information technology - Security techniques - Hash- functions Part 1: General SANS 18-2:2011/ISO/IEC 10118-2:2010, IDT, Ed. 3 2 Information technology - Security techniques - Hash- functions Part 2: Hash-functions using an n-bit block cipher SANS 18-3:2007/ISO/IEC 10118-3:2004, IDT, Ed. 3 2 Information technology - Security techniques - Hash- functions Part 3: Dedicated hash-functions SANS 18-4:2003/ISO/IEC 10118-4:1998, IDT, Ed. -
Information Standards Quarterly WINTER 2012 | VOL 24 | ISSUE 1 | ISSN 1041-0031
O O S C E ing f R D O SERU (SHAREd E-Res OURCE UndERS arTTanding)Icle St St O EXCERPted FRom: ISO/TR 14873 ISO/TR ES CORE (C CORE RI A 25964-1 R O B I IS ISO/ TR 11219 ISO/ n L I RFID Z39.7 DATa DicTIONARy STAN DicTIONARy DATa Z39.7 ISO 5127 ISO 8 INFORMATION STANDARDS QuARTERLY WINTER 2012 | VOL 24 | ISSUE 1 | ISSN 1041-0031 SPECIAL EDITION: YEAR IN REVIEW AND STATE OF THE STANDARDS ISO/TR 17068 ISO 13008 ISO 17316 ISO 3166 ISO 17316 11219 2789 O TR / IS O KBART PHASe 2 IS Open DisCOVERy INITIATIVE TE TE I ISO 13008 ISO Su NISO and TC46 G A ISO 2709 ISO T 2011 Year In REVIEW t GrOUP E S G cle I RT From ISO 2788 to ISO 25964: A al Intere The EVOLUTIon oF I on exCHAN I THESAURUS STANDARDS 17316 27729 O O IS IS S: Journal AT J DEVELopment oF RESOURCE NFORMAT -book SpeC I E SYNCHRONIZATIon STANDARD ISO 9:1995 STATE OF THE ORMAt ORMAt For F STANDARDS 16175-2 2709:2008, 2709:2008, O O IS IS 20 SP Stella G. Marcia SP[ SPOTLIGHT ] Dextre Clarke Lei Zeng Stella G. DEX tre CLARKe and MARCIa LEI ZENG From ISO 2788 to ISO 25964: The Evolution of Thesaurus Standards towards Interoperability and Data Modeling STANDARD SPOTLIGHT The information retrieval thesaurus emerged from pioneering work in the 1960s, and by 1974 the principles and practical guidance for constructing thesauri were enshrined in the international standard ISO 2788 as well as national standards such as ANSI/NISO Z39.19. -
Relevant Standards Procedures
LONG TERM PRESERVATION OF EARTH OBSERVATION SPACE DATA RELEVANT STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES Ref. : STFC D3.2 Issue : Draft Date : 15/10/2010 LTDP Relevant Standards and Procedures Page: 2 of 174 CHANGE LOG Reason for change Issue Date First emission 1.0 15 October 2010 CHANGE RECORD Issue: Draft Reason for change page(s) Paragraph(s) First emission All All Role Name Writers Esther Conway (STFC) 2 Ref. : STFC D3.2 Issue : Draft Date : 15/10/2010 LTDP Relevant Standards and Procedures Page: 3 of 174 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 EUROPEAN LTDP INITIATIVES ........................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 DOCUMENT SCOPE AND PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 SURVEY METHODOLOGY AND LEGEND ............................................................................................................... 8 1.4 STANDARDS ACCREDITING ORGANIZATIONS ..................................................................................................... 8 1.5 ORGANIZATIONS AND INITIATIVES CONTRIBUTING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF STANDARDS ........................... 12 2 RELEVANT STANDARDS ................................................................................................................................. 17 2.1 INTRODUCTION