DOCSLIB.ORG

Relevant Standards Procedures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Relevant Standards Procedures LONG TERM PRESERVATION OF EARTH OBSERVATION SPACE DATA RELEVANT STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES Ref. : STFC D3.2 Issue : Draft Date : 15/10/2010 LTDP Relevant Standards and Procedures Page: 2 of 174 CHANGE LOG Reason for change Issue Date First emission 1.0 15 October 2010 CHANGE RECORD Issue: Draft Reason for change page(s) Paragraph(s) First emission All All Role Name Writers Esther Conway (STFC) 2 Ref. : STFC D3.2 Issue : Draft Date : 15/10/2010 LTDP Relevant Standards and Procedures Page: 3 of 174 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 7 1.1 EUROPEAN LTDP INITIATIVES ........................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 DOCUMENT SCOPE AND PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 SURVEY METHODOLOGY AND LEGEND ............................................................................................................... 8 1.4 STANDARDS ACCREDITING ORGANIZATIONS ..................................................................................................... 8 1.5 ORGANIZATIONS AND INITIATIVES CONTRIBUTING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF STANDARDS ........................... 12 2 RELEVANT STANDARDS ................................................................................................................................. 17 2.1 INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................... 17 2.2 AUTHENTICATION ............................................................................................................................................ 18 2.2.1 Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community Framework for Electronic Signatures. .............................................................................................. 18 2.2.2 OASIS Digital Signature Service ............................................................................................................. 19 2.2.3 ISO/IEC 9594-8: Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection - The Directory: Public-key and Attribute Certificate Frameworks .................................................................................................................. 20 2.2.4 Security Assertion MarkUP Language .................................................................................................... 21 2.3 DIGITAL DOCUMENT PRESERVATION STANDARDS .......................................................................................... 22 2.3.1 ISO/TR 18492: Long-Term Preservation of Electronic Document-Based Information .......................... 22 2.4 FILE FORMATS AND DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES ............................................................................................... 23 2.4.1 Standard Archive Format for Europe ...................................................................................................... 23 2.4.2 NetCDF (network Common Data Form) ................................................................................................. 24 2.4.3 Open document format for office applications (OpenDocument) ........................................................... 25 2.4.4 DocBook ................................................................................................................................................... 26 2.4.5 ISO 19005-1: Document Management - Electronic Document File Format for Long-term Preservation 27 2.4.6 NASA AMES ............................................................................................................................................. 28 2.4.7 JCAMP - DX ............................................................................................................................................ 29 2.4.8 HDF ......................................................................................................................................................... 29 2.4.9 CDF ......................................................................................................................................................... 31 2.4.10 CEOS Superstructure format ................................................................................................................. 32 2.4.11 MPH/SPH/DHR data formats ................................................................................................................ 33 2.4.12 Spatial data Transfer standard .............................................................................................................. 34 2.4.13 Flexible image transport system (FITS) ................................................................................................ 35 2.4.14 Graphics Interchange Format (GIF) ..................................................................................................... 36 2.4.15 Binary Universal Form for the Representation of meteorological data (BUFR) .................................. 37 2.4.16 GEOTiff .................................................................................................................................................. 38 2.4.17 GRIB ...................................................................................................................................................... 39 2.4.18 Post Processing Format (PP) ................................................................................................................ 40 2.4.19 Data description EAST Specification .................................................................................................... 41 2.4.20 Data Format Description Language ...................................................................................................... 42 2.4.21 PVL (Parameter value language ) ......................................................................................................... 43 2.4.22 DRB ........................................................................................................................................................ 44 2.5 IDENTIFIER STANDARDS ................................................................................................................................... 45 2.5.1 Archival Resource Key ............................................................................................................................. 45 2.5.2 Syntax for the Digital Object Identifier ................................................................................................... 46 2.5.3 ISO/IEC 9834-8: Universally Unique Identifiers (UUIDs) ..................................................................... 47 2.5.4 Procedures for item registration .............................................................................................................. 48 2.6 IMAGING STANDARDS ...................................................................................................................................... 49 2.6.1 ISO/TR 15801: Electronic Imaging - Information Stored Electronically - Recommendations for Trustworthiness and Reliability ............................................................................................................................ 49 2.6.2 ISO/TS 12033: Electronic Imaging -- Guidance for Selection of Document Image Compression Methods 50 2.7 INTEROPERABILITY PROTOCOLS ...................................................................................................................... 51 2.7.1 Open Archive Initiative - Protocol for Metadata Harvesting .................................................................. 51 2.7.2 Extensible Markup Language (XML) ...................................................................................................... 52 3 Ref. : STFC D3.2 Issue : Draft Date : 15/10/2010 LTDP Relevant Standards and Procedures Page: 4 of 174 2.8 METADATA CONTENT STANDARDS AND CATALOGUING ................................................................................. 53 2.8.1 Catalogue Services Standard 2.0 Extension Package for ebRIM Application Profile: Earth Observation Products ................................................................................................................................................................ 53 2.8.2 OpenGIS® Catalogue Services Specification .......................................................................................... 54 2.8.3 Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules ........................................................................................................ 56 2.8.4 IETF Matching of Language Tags ........................................................................................................... 57 2.8.5 IETF Tags for Identifying Languages ...................................................................................................... 58 2.8.6 MAchine-Readable Cataloguing .............................................................................................................. 59 2.8.7 Rules for Archival Description ................................................................................................................ 60 2.9 METADATA DESCRIPTION STANDARDS ............................................................................................................ 61
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses An investigation into evolving support for component reuse Lavery, Janet How to cite: Lavery, Janet (1999) An investigation into evolving support for component reuse, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4399/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk University of Durham Department of Computer Science M.Sc. Thesis An Investigation into Evolving Support for Component Reuse Janet Lavery 1999 The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should 1)0 pulilishcd in any form, including Electronic and the Internet, without the author's prior written consent. All information derived from this thesis must he acknowledged appropriately. Abstract It is common in engineering disciplines for new product development to be based on a concept of reuse, i.e. based on a foundation of knowledge and pre-existing components familiar to the discipline's community.
    [Show full text]
  • AS/NZS ISO 6709:2011 ISO 6709:2008 ISO 6709:2008 Cor.1 (2009) AS/NZS ISO 6709:2011 AS/NZS ISO 6709:2011
    AS/NZS ISO 6709:2011 ISO 6709:2008 ISO 6709:2008 Cor.1 (2009) AS/NZS ISO 6709:2011AS/NZS ISO Australian/New Zealand Standard™ Standard representation of geographic point location by coordinates AS/NZS ISO 6709:2011 This Joint Australian/New Zealand Standard was prepared by Joint Technical Committee IT-004, Geographical Information/Geomatics. It was approved on behalf of the Council of Standards Australia on 15 November 2011 and on behalf of the Council of Standards New Zealand on 14 November 2011. This Standard was published on 23 December 2011. The following are represented on Committee IT-004: ANZLIC—The Spatial Information Council Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities Council Australian Antarctic Division Australian Hydrographic Office Australian Map Circle CSIRO Exploration and Mining Department of Lands, NSW Department of Primary Industries and Water, Tas. Geoscience Australia Land Information New Zealand Mercury Project Solutions Office of Spatial Data Management The University of Melbourne Keeping Standards up-to-date Standards are living documents which reflect progress in science, technology and systems. To maintain their currency, all Standards are periodically reviewed, and new editions are published. Between editions, amendments may be issued. Standards may also be withdrawn. It is important that readers assure themselves they are using a current Standard, which should include any amendments which may have been published since the Standard was purchased. Detailed information about joint Australian/New Zealand Standards can be found by visiting the Standards Web Shop at www.saiglobal.com.au or Standards New Zealand web site at www.standards.co.nz and looking up the relevant Standard in the on-line catalogue.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Represent the Unesco Thesaurus for the Semantic Web Applying Iso-25964
    1 PROPOSAL TO REPRESENT THE UNESCO THESAURUS FOR THE SEMANTIC WEB APPLYING ISO-25964 Juan-Antonio Pastor-Sánchez (1) (1) University of Murcia, Faculty of Communication and Documentation, [email protected] Abstract and ISO-THES with the properties of a vocabulary developed This paper shows how has been applied ISO-25964 standard in the context of UNESKOS project. The conclusions point, to represent the UNESCO thesaurus through semantic web among other aspects, a review of SKOS and adoption of ap- technologies. Based on the works done by the UNESKOS propriate technologies that facilitate the development of fu- project, has been analyzed the joint use of SKOS and ISO- ture works and research lines focused on the alignment of THES ontologies to represent thesauri according to the data vocabularies. model of the ISO-25964 standard. The result has been an Keywords: UNESCO Thesaurus; SKOS; Semantic Web; RDF dataset, accessible as Linked Open Data, using SKOS ISO-25964; ISO-THES; UNESKOS 1 Introduction working group are developing the ISO-THES ontology that complements SKOS and complains the properties Actually, SKOS is the most used ontology to represent of ISO-25964 for representing any kind of Thesaurus interoperables Knowledge Organization Systems in the (Isaac and De Smedt, 2015). Semantic Web (Pastor-Sánchez, et al., 2012). SKOS was developed in a first stage into the SWAD- The UNESKOS project exists since 2012 with the aim EUROPE project between 2002 and 2004. Finally was to offer SKOS versions of both, the Proposed Interna- adopted as W3C recommendation in 2009 (W3C, tional Standard Nomenclature for Fields of Science and 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of an Ontology-Based Knowledge-Management-System
    Information Services & Use 25 (2005) 181–195 181 IOS Press Evaluation of an Ontology-based Knowledge-Management-System. A Case Study of Convera RetrievalWare 8.0 1 Oliver Bayer, Stefanie Höhfeld ∗, Frauke Josbächer, Nico Kimm, Ina Kradepohl, Melanie Kwiatkowski, Cornelius Puschmann, Mathias Sabbagh, Nils Werner and Ulrike Vollmer Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Institute of Language and Information, Department of Information Science, Universitaetsstraße 1, D-40225 Duesseldorf, Germany Abstract. With RetrievalWare 8.0TM the American company Convera offers an elaborated software in the range of Information Retrieval, Information Indexing and Knowledge Management. Convera promises the possibility of handling different file for- mats in many different languages. Regarding comparable products one innovation is to be stressed particularly: the possibility of the preparation as well as integration of an ontology. One tool of the software package is useful in order to produce ontologies manually, to process existing ontologies and to import the very. The processing of search results is also to be mentioned. By means of categorization strategies search results can be classified dynamically and presented in personalized representations. This study presents an evaluation of the functions and components of the system. Technological aspects and modes of opera- tion under the surface of Convera RetrievalWare will be analysed, with a focus on the creation of libraries and thesauri, and the problems posed by the integration of an existing thesaurus. Broader aspects such as usability and system ergonomics are integrated in the examination as well. Keywords: Categorization, Convera RetrievalWare, disambiguation, dynamic classification, information indexing, information retrieval, ISO 5964, knowledge management, ontology, user interface, taxonomy, thesaurus 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributing to the Getty Vocabularies (2020)
    Contributing to the Getty Vocabularies Revised May 2020 Patricia Harpring Managing Editor Getty Vocabulary Program Patricia Harpring Contributing to the Getty Vocabularies revised 13 May 2020 1 Table of Contents • Contributing to ULAN ….76 • Preface ….3 • ...Required Fields ….82 • What Are the Getty Vocabularies …5 • ...Sources ….99 • Basics for Contributions ….18 • Contributing to TGN ….103 • ...Who Contributes? ….19 • ...Required Fields ….109... • ...Processing Contributions ….21 • Sources ….122 • ...Criteria for Contributions ….23 • Contributing to CONA ….128 • ...XML: Mapping Your Data ….30 • ...Required Fields ….134 • …Spreadsheet: use OpenRefine...33 • ...Sources ….156 • …Online contribution form …35 • Contributing to the IA ….163 • Contributing to the AAT ….36 • ...Required Fields ….168 • ...Required Fields ….42 • ...Sources ….181 • ...Sources ...68 • Exercise ……. 188 Contributing to the Getty Vocabularies Patricia Harpring Contributing to the Getty Vocabularies revised 13 May 2020 2 Preface • This presentation is a brief overview of general issues surrounding contributions to the Getty Vocabularies • It includes examples of various issues surrounding contributions; it is not comprehensive Getty Vocabularies • The complex and extensive rules and examples surrounding the fields are not included in this presentation • For extensive guidance concerning rules and issues, in a field‐by‐field discussion, see the online • For general information about contributions and Getty Vocabulary Editorial Guidelines, which contain links to contribution
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Erik Wilde
    dretbiblio dretbiblio Erik Wilde's Bibliography References [1] AFIPS Fall Joint Computer Conference, San Francisco, California, December 1968. [2] Seventeenth IEEE Conference on Computer Communication Networks, Washington, D.C., 1978. [3] ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, Los Angeles, Cal- ifornia, March 1982. ACM Press. [4] First Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 1986. [5] 1987 ACM Conference on Hypertext, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, November 1987. ACM Press. [6] 18th IEEE International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing, Tokyo, Japan, 1988. IEEE Computer Society Press. [7] Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Portland, Oregon, 1988. ACM Press. [8] Conference on Office Information Systems, Palo Alto, California, March 1988. [9] 1989 ACM Conference on Hypertext, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, November 1989. ACM Press. [10] UNIX | The Legend Evolves. Summer 1990 UKUUG Conference, Buntingford, UK, 1990. UKUUG. [11] Fourth ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Hilton Head, South Carolina, November 1991. [12] GLOBECOM'91 Conference, Phoenix, Arizona, 1991. IEEE Computer Society Press. [13] IEEE INFOCOM '91 Conference on Computer Communications, Bal Harbour, Florida, 1991. IEEE Computer Society Press. [14] IEEE International Conference on Communications, Denver, Colorado, June 1991. [15] International Workshop on CSCW, Berlin, Germany, April 1991. [16] Third ACM Conference on Hypertext, San Antonio, Texas, December 1991. ACM Press. [17] 11th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, Houston, Texas, 1992. IEEE Computer Society Press. [18] 3rd Joint European Networking Conference, Innsbruck, Austria, May 1992. [19] Fourth ACM Conference on Hypertext, Milano, Italy, November 1992. ACM Press. [20] GLOBECOM'92 Conference, Orlando, Florida, December 1992. IEEE Computer Society Press. http://github.com/dret/biblio (August 29, 2018) 1 dretbiblio [21] IEEE INFOCOM '92 Conference on Computer Communications, Florence, Italy, 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • R16 B.TECH CSE IV Year Syllabus
    R16 B.TECH CSE. JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY HYDERABAD B.TECH. COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING IV YEAR COURSE STRUCTURE & SYLLABUS (R16) Applicable From 2016-17 Admitted Batch IV YEAR I SEMESTER S. No Course Code Course Title L T P Credits 1 CS701PC Data Mining 4 0 0 4 2 CS702PC Principles of Programming Languages 4 0 0 4 3 Professional Elective – II 3 0 0 3 4 Professional Elective – III 3 0 0 3 5 Professional Elective – IV 3 0 0 3 6 CS703PC Data Mining Lab 0 0 3 2 7 PE-II Lab # 0 0 3 2 CS751PC Python Programming Lab CS752PC Android Application Development Lab CS753PC Linux programming Lab CS754PC R Programming Lab CS755PC Internet of Things Lab 8 CS705PC Industry Oriented Mini Project 0 0 3 2 9 CS706PC Seminar 0 0 2 1 Total Credits 17 0 11 24 # Courses in PE - II and PE - II Lab must be in 1-1 correspondence. IV YEAR II SEMESTER Course S. No Course Title L T P Credits Code 1 Open Elective – III 3 0 0 3 2 Professional Elective – V 3 0 0 3 3 Professional Elective – VI 3 0 0 3 4 CS801PC Major Project 0 0 30 15 Total Credits 9 0 30 24 Professional Elective – I CS611PE Mobile Computing CS612PE Design Patterns CS613PE Artificial Intelligence CS614PE Information Security Management (Security Analyst - I) CS615PE Introduction to Analytics (Associate Analytics - I) R16 B.TECH CSE. Professional Elective – II CS721PE Python Programming CS722PE Android Application Development CS723PE Linux Programming CS724PE R Programming CS725PE Internet of Things Professional Elective - III CS731PE Distributed Systems CS732PE Machine Learning CS733PE
    [Show full text]
  • NGDA Baseline Standards Inventory Companion Guide
    The Companion Guide: Achieving an NGDA Baseline Standards Inventory A Baseline Assessment to Meet Geospatial Data Act, Federal Data Strategy, and Other Requirements Federal Geographic Data Committee August 31, 2020 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Approach ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Outcomes ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 How to Use this Document ........................................................................................................................... 2 Geospatial Data and Metadata Standards .................................................................................................... 3 Data Standards Categories ............................................................................................................................ 5 Data Content Standards Category Definitions .......................................................................................... 5 Data Exchange Standards Definitions ....................................................................................................... 8 Metadata Standards Categories ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Information Standards Quarterly Winter 2009, Vol 21, Issue 1
    INFORMATION STANDARDS QUARTERLY WINTER 2009 | VOL 21 | ISSUE 1 | ISSN 1041-0031 SPECIAL ANNIVERSARY EDITION: PART ONE NISO CELEBRATES 70 YEARS METADATa MIX AND MATCh UsinG STANDARDS TO TAME ERM PERFECTing sinGLE siGN-on AUTHENTicATion STATE OF THe STANDARDS & YEAR in REVIEW WWW.NISO.ORG/NEWS/EVENTS 2009 EVENTS JANUARY 2009 NISO Open Teleconferences January 14 - NISO Webinar: Digital Preservation: Current Efforts January 23–26 - NISO @ ALA Midwinter 2009 | Denver, CO Join NISO on these free conference calls to learn about new projects within NISO as well as to provide the organization FEBRUARY 2009 with feedback and input on areas where February 11 - NISO Webinar: Single Sign-On (SSO) Authentication NISO ought to be engaged. NISO teleconferences are held from 3-4 p.m. (eastern) on the second Monday of each MARCH 2009 month (excepting July and September). March 12–14 - NISO @ ACRL | Seattle, WA To join, simply dial 877-375-2160 and March 18- NISO Webinar: Data Movement and Management enter the code: 17800743. APRIL 2009 April 8 - NISO Webinar: KBART (Knowledge Base and Related Tools) and the OpenURL MAY 2009 May 6 - NISO/COUNTER Webinar: COUNTER: A How-To Guide May 13 - NISO/COUNTER Webinar: New Applications of Usage Data JUNE 2009 June 1 - Performance Measures and Assessment | Baltimore, MD June 10 - NISO Webinar: Interoperability Issues JULY 2009 July 10 - NISO/BISG Forum: The Standards Landscape | Chicago, IL - ALA Annual July 10–14 - NISO @ ALA Annual | Chicago, IL AUGUST 2009 August 12 - NISO Webinar: E-books SEPTEMBER 2009 September 9 - NISO Webinar: Licensing Introductory Issues/SERU OCTOBER 2009 October 12–13 - Library Resource Management Systems | Boston, MA 2009 Webinar subscription October 14 - NISO Webinar: MARC/RDA/Bibliographic Control packages are now available: Buy three webinars, get one free (www.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evolutive Process to Convert Glossaries Into Ontologies
    An Evolutive Process to José R. Hilera, Carmen Pagés, Convert Glossaries into J. Javier Martínez, J. Antonio Ontologies Gutiérrez, and Luis de-Marcos This paper describes a method to generate ontologies from dictionary, the outcome will be limited by the richness glossaries of terms. The proposed method presupposes an of the definition of terms included in that dictionary. It would be what is normally called a “lightweight” ontol- evolutionary life cycle based on successive transforma- ogy,6 which could later be converted into a “heavyweight” tions of the original glossary that lead to products of ontology by implementing, in the form of axioms, know- intermediate knowledge representation (dictionary, tax- ledge not contained in the dictionary. This paper describes onomy, and thesaurus). These products are characterized the process of creating a lightweight ontology of the domain of software engineering, starting from the IEEE by an increase in semantic expressiveness in comparison Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology.7 to the product obtained in the previous transformation, with the ontology as the end product. Although this method has been applied to produce an ontology from Ontologies, the Semantic Web, ■■ and Libraries the “IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology,” it could be applied to any glossary of any Within the field of librarianship, ontologies are already knowledge domain to generate an ontology that may be being used as alternative tools to traditional controlled vocabularies. This may be observed particularly within used to index or search for information resources and the realm of digital libraries, although, as Krause asserts, documents stored in libraries or on the Semantic Web.
    [Show full text]
  • ZMLUVA Uzatvorená Podľa§ 269 Ods
    ZMLUVA uzatvorená podľa§ 269 ods. 2 zákona č. 513/1991 Zb. Obchodný zákonník v znení neskorších predpisov Čl. 1 ZMLUVNÉ STRANY 1 .1 . Objednávateľ : MINISTERSTVO SPRAVODLIVOSTI SR Sídlo: Župné námestie 13, 813 11 Bratislava V zastúpení: JUDr. Ľubomíra Vrobelová – vedúca služobného úradu IČO: 00166073 DIČ: 2020830196 Bankové spojenie: Štátna pokladnica Číslo účtu: (ďalej len „Objednávateľ“) 1 .2 . D odá va t e ľ : He wl e t t - Packard Slovakia, s.r.o. S í d lo : G alv a ni h o 7, 820 02 Bratislava V zastúpení : Ing. Henrieta Kostková, konateľ IČO: 35 785 306 DIČ: SK2020213393 Bankové spojenie: Všeobecná úverová banka, a.s. Číslo účtu: Reg. číslo z Obch. registra: Okresný súd Bratislava I., oddiel Sro, vložka č. 21438/B tel. (+421) – 2 – 5752 5111 fax (+421) – 2 – 5752 5222 e-mail [email protected] (ďalej len „Dodávateľ“) (ďalej spolu len „zmluvné strany“) 1 Čl. 2 P R E A M B U L A 2.1. Zmluvné strany uzatvárajú túto zmluvu ako výsledok súťažného dialógu pre zákazku: „IT služby pre e-justice“ realizovanú podľa zákona č. 25/2006 Z. z. o verejnom obstarávaní a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov v znení neskorších predpisov. 2.2. Zmluvné strany touto zmluvou upravujú základy/podmienky zmluvnej spolupráce v oblasti dodávky hardvéru a licencií (ďalej len „tovary“) a poskytovania služieb, ktoré tvoria predmet tejto zmluvy a podmienky budúceho zadávania a uzatvárania vykonávacích zmlúv. 2.3. Neoddeliteľnú súčasť tejto zmluvy tvoria tieto prílohy : a) Príloha č. 1, ktorá obsahuje výsledný opis predmetu zákazky/zmluvy; b) Príloha č. 2, ktorá obsahuje jednotkové ceny hardvéru a licencií a jednotkové ceny služieb.
    [Show full text]
  • DRE) for Software
    Exceeding 99% in Defect Removal Efficiency (DRE) for Software Draft 11.0 September 6, 2016 Capers Jones, VP and CTO, Namcook Analytics LLC Abstract Software quality depends upon two important variables. The first variable is that of “defect potentials” or the sum total of bugs likely to occur in requirements, architecture, design, code, documents, and “bad fixes” or new bugs in bug repairs. Defect potentials are measured using function point metrics, since “lines of code” cannot deal with requirements and design defects. (This paper uses IFPUG function points version 4.3. The newer SNAP metrics are only shown experimentally due to insufficient empirical quality data with SNAP as of 2016. However an experimental tool is included for calculating SNAP defects.) The second important measure is “defect removal efficiency (DRE)” or the percentage of bugs found and eliminated before release of software to clients. The metrics of Defect Potentials and Defect Removal Efficiency (DRE) were developed by IBM circa 1973 and are widely used by technology companies and also by insurance companies, banks, and other companies with large software organizations. The author’s Software Risk Master (SRM) estimating tool predicts defect potentials and defect removal efficiency (DRE) as standard quality outputs for all software projects. Web: www.Namcook.com Email: [email protected] Copyright © 2016 by Capers Jones. All rights reserved. 1 Introduction Defect potentials and defect removal efficiency (DRE) are useful quality metrics developed by IBM circa 1973 and widely used by technology companies as well as by banks, insurance companies, and other organizations with large software staffs. This combination of defect potentials using function points and defect removal efficiency (DRE) are the only accurate and effective measures for software quality.
    [Show full text]