2013 Minerals Yearbook BORON [ADVANCE RELEASE]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rocks and Minerals in This Station-Based Event
Gary Vorwald NYS Rock & Mineral Supervisor Paul J. Gelinas JHS [email protected] Event Description Participants will demonstrate their knowledge of rocks and minerals in this station-based event. A team of up to 2 Approximate time: 40 – 50 Minutes Event Parameters Each team may bring: one magnifying glass One 3-ring binder (1 inch) containing information in any form from any source Materials MUST be 3-hole punched and inserted into the rings (sheet protectors allowed) The Competition Station Event: 15-24 stations with samples & questions Equal time intervals will be allotted for each station. When the signal is given, participants will begin work at their initial station. Participants may not move to the next station until prompted to do so, may not skip stations, nor return to any previously-visited station Mineral and Rock Stations The Competition HCl will not be provided, nor may it be brought to, or be used during the competition. Written descriptions as to how a specimen might react were it to be tested with HCl may be provided. The Competition Identification will be limited to specimens appearing on the Official Science Olympiad Rock and Mineral List (see www.soinc.org) Other rocks or minerals may be used to illustrate key concepts. Tournament Directors may include up to five additional specimens important to their own state. If additional specimens are to be included, all teams must be notified no later than 3 weeks prior to the competition. 2017 Rock & Mineral List Available at: https://www. soinc.org Students should place list in front of notebook Minerals are organized by mineral family Consists of: 59 Minerals 7 Metamorphic Rocks 10 Igneous Rocks 17 Sedimentary Rocks (or varieties) Minerals Native Elements 31. -
Boiler 26 SEARLES VALLEY MINERALS
SEARLES VALLEY MINERALS — TRONA, ARGUS and WESTEND FACILITY MDAQMD Federal Operating Permit Number: 90002 MOJAVE DESERT AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Federal Operating Permit Number: 90002 For: SEARLES VALLEY MINERALS OPERATIONS, INC. Facility: TRONA, ARGUS, AND WESTEND (FACILITIES) Renewed Pursuant to MDAQMD Regulation XII Effective Date: March 14, 2017 This Federal Operating Permit Expires On: March 14, 2022 Issued By: Br., Poiriez Executive Director 14306 PARK AVENUE, VICTORVILLE, CALIFORNIA 92392 PHONE (760) 245-1661 FAX (760) 245-2022 SEARLES VALLEY MINERALS – TRONA, ARGUS and WESTEND FACILITY MDAQMD Federal Operating Permit Number: 90002 PERMIT REVISIONS This Federal Operating Permit (FOP) is renewed pursuant to Regulation XII- Federal Operating Permits. See Statement of Legal and Factual Basis for a summary of items related to this FOP renewal and an explanation of pertinent applicability determinations made to this FOP during renewal. 2 SEARLES VALLEY MINERALS – TRONA, ARGUS and WESTEND FACILITY MDAQMD Federal Operating Permit Number: 90002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Permit Revisions ......................................................................................................2 Part I Introductory Information ...................................................................................... I-4 Part II Applicable Requirements and Emissions Limitations .........................................II-9 Part III Monitoring, Recordkeeping, Reporting and Testing Requirements ................ III-32 Part IV Standard Federal Operating -
CASE STUDY Methane Recovery at Non-Coal Mines
CASE STUDY Methane Recovery at Non-coal Mines Background Existing methane recovery projects at non-coal mines reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by up to 3 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e). Although methane emissions are generally associated with coal mines, methane is also found in salt, potash, trona, diamond, gold, base metals, and lead mines throughout the world. Many of these deposits are located adjacent to hydrocarbon (e.g., coal and oil) deposits where methane originates. Consequently, during the process of mining non-coal deposits, methane may be released. Overview of Methane Recovery Projects Beatrix Gold Mine, South Africa Promethium Carbon, a carbon and climate change advisory firm, has developed a project to capture and use methane from the Beatrix Gold Mine in Free State, South Africa (see box). Project Specifications: Beatrix Gold Mine Name Capture and Utilization of Methane at the Gold Fields–owned Beatrix Mine in South Africa Site Free State Province, South Africa Owner Gold Fields Ltd., Exxaro On-site Pty Ltd. Dates of Operation May 2011–present Equipment Phase 1 • GE Roots Blowers • Trolex gas monitoring systems • Flame arrestor • 23 burner flare Equipment Phase 2 Addition of internal combustion engines End-use Phase 1 Destruction through flaring End-use Phase 2 4 MW power generation Emission Reductions 1.7 million tons CO²e expected over CDM project lifetime (through 2016) Commissioning of Flare at Beatrix Gold Mine (Photo courtesy of Gold Fields Ltd.) CASE STUDY Methane Recovery at Non-coal Mines ABUTEC Mine Gas Incinerator at Green River Trona Mine (Photo courtesy of Solvay Chemicals, Inc.) Green River Trona Mine, United States Project Specifications: Green River Trona Mine Trona is an evaporite mineral mined in the United States Name Green River Trona Mine Methane as the primary source of sodium carbonate, or soda ash. -
Trona Na3(CO3)(HCO3) • 2H2O C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
Trona Na3(CO3)(HCO3) • 2H2O c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Monoclinic. Point Group: 2/m. Crystals are dominated by {001}, {100}, flattened on {001} and elongated on [010], with minor {201}, {301}, {211}, {211}, {411},to 10 cm; may be fibrous or columnar massive, as rosettelike aggregates. Physical Properties: Cleavage: {100}, perfect; {211} and {001}, interrupted. Fracture: Uneven to subconchoidal. Hardness = 2.5–3 D(meas.) = 2.11 D(calc.) = 2.124 Soluble in H2O, alkaline taste; may fluoresce under SW UV. Optical Properties: Translucent. Color: Colorless, gray, pale yellow, brown; colorless in transmitted light. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: Biaxial (–). Orientation: X = b; Z ∧ c =83◦. Dispersion: r< v; strong. α = 1.412–1.417 β = 1.492–1.494 γ = 1.540–1.543 2V(meas.) = 76◦160 2V(calc.) = 74◦ Cell Data: Space Group: I2/a. a = 20.4218(9) b = 3.4913(1) c = 10.3326(6) β = 106.452(4)◦ Z=4 X-ray Powder Pattern: Sweetwater Co., Wyoming, USA. 2.647 (100), 3.071 (80), 4.892 (55), 9.77 (45), 2.444 (30), 2.254 (30), 2.029 (30) Chemistry: (1) (2) CO2 38.13 38.94 SO3 0.70 Na2O 41.00 41.13 Cl 0.19 H2O 20.07 19.93 insol. 0.02 −O=Cl2 0.04 Total 100.07 100.00 • (1) Owens Lake, California, USA; average of several analyses. (2) Na3(CO3)(HCO3) 2H2O. Occurrence: Deposited from saline lakes and along river banks as efflorescences in arid climates; rarely from fumarolic action. Association: Natron, thermonatrite, halite, glauberite, th´enardite,mirabilite, gypsum (alkali lakes); shortite, northupite, bradleyite, pirssonite (Green River Formation, Wyoming, USA). -
Remarks on Different Methods for Analyzing Trona and Soda Samples
REMARKS ON DIFFERENT METHODS FOR ANALYZING TRONA AND SODA SAMPLES Gülay ATAMAN*; Süheyla TUNCER* and Nurgün GÜNGÖR* ABSTRACT. — Trona is one of the natural forms of sodium carbonate minerals. It is well known as «sesque carbonate», «urao» or «trona» in the chemical literature, and the chemical formula of the compound is [Na2CO3.NaHCO3.2H2O]. The aim of this work is to adapt the standard methods for the analysis of trona samples, considering the inter- ferences arising from silicates and other minerals found together with trona samples. In order to reduce the experimen- tal errors, the analyses used for the determination of trona samples have been revised. The experimental results using potentiometric titration, AgNO3 external indicator and BaCl2 titration methods have been compared to theoretical results using statistical evaluations. 95 % confidence level, which is commonly used by analytical chemists, was employed as the basis of evaluation, R values, Student's t calculated at 95 % confidence level of 7 trona samples from Beypazarı, Student's t tabulated for the percentages of Na2CO3, were found to be 0.008 in BaCl2 method, 3.25 for AgNO3 external indicator method and 3.26 for potentiometric method; for the percentages of NaHCO3 the same values are 0.59 for BaCl2 method, 2.83 for AgNO3 external indicator method and 3.59 for potentiometric method. Systematic error is indicated when R> 1. In addi- tion to quantitative analysis of trona samples, qualitative XRD analyses have been routinely performed for each sample and the results were found to be in good agreement. INTRODUCTION Trona is a naturally occuring from of sodium carbonate minerals. -
1469 Vol 43#5 Art 03.Indd
1469 The Canadian Mineralogist Vol. 43, pp. 1469-1487 (2005) BORATE MINERALS OF THE PENOBSQUIS AND MILLSTREAM DEPOSITS, SOUTHERN NEW BRUNSWICK, CANADA JOEL D. GRICE§, ROBERT A. GAULT AND JERRY VAN VELTHUIZEN† Research Division, Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 6P4, Canada ABSTRACT The borate minerals found in two potash deposits, at Penobsquis and Millstream, Kings County, New Brunswick, are described in detail. These deposits are located in the Moncton Subbasin, which forms the eastern portion of the extensive Maritimes Basin. These marine evaporites consist of an early carbonate unit, followed by a sulfate, and fi nally, a salt unit. The borate assemblages occur in specifi c beds of halite and sylvite that were the last units to form in the evaporite sequence. Species identifi ed from drill-core sections include: boracite, brianroulstonite, chambersite, colemanite, congolite, danburite, hilgardite, howlite, hydroboracite, kurgantaite, penobsquisite, pringleite, ruitenbergite, strontioginorite, szaibélyite, trembathite, veatchite, volkovskite and walkerite. In addition, 41 non-borate species have been identifi ed, including magnesite, monohydrocalcite, sellaite, kieserite and fl uorite. The borate assemblages in the two deposits differ, and in each deposit, they vary stratigraphically. At Millstream, boracite is the most common borate in the sylvite + carnallite beds, with hilgardite in the lower halite strata. At Penobsquis, there is an upper unit of hilgardite + volkovskite + trembathite in halite and a lower unit of hydroboracite + volkov- skite + trembathite–congolite in halite–sylvite. At both deposits, values of the ratio of B isotopes [␦11B] range from 21.5 to 37.8‰ [21 analyses] and are consistent with a seawater source, without any need for a more exotic interpretation. -
Inyoite Cab3o3(OH)5 • 4H2O C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
Inyoite CaB3O3(OH)5 • 4H2O c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Monoclinic. Point Group: 2/m. Typically as crystals, short prismatic along [001], tabular on {001}, exhibiting prominent {110} and {001} and a dozen other minor forms, to 2.5 cm; in cockscomb aggregates of pseudorhombohedral crystals; also coarse spherulitic, granular. Physical Properties: Cleavage: {001}, good; {010}, distinct. Fracture: Irregular. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 2 D(meas.) = 1.875 D(calc.) = 1.87 Soluble in H2O. Optical Properties: Transparent, translucent on dehydration. Color: Colorless, white on dehydration. Luster: Vitreous. Optical Class: Biaxial (–). Orientation: Y = b; X ∧ c =37◦; Z ∧ c = –53◦. Dispersion: r< v, slight. α = 1.490–1.495 β = 1.501–1.505 γ = 1.516–1.520 2V(meas.) = 70◦–86◦ Cell Data: Space Group: P 21/a. a = 10.621(1)) b = 12.066(1) c = 8.408(1) β = 114◦1.2◦ Z=4 X-ray Powder Pattern: Monte Azul mine, Argentina. 7.67 (100), 2.526 (25), 3.368 (22), 1.968 (22), 2.547 (21), 3.450 (20), 2.799 (19) Chemistry: (1) (2) B2O3 37.44 37.62 CaO 20.42 20.20 + H2O 9.46 − H2O 32.46 H2O 42.18 rem. 0.55 Total 100.33 100.00 • (1) Hillsborough, Canada; remnant is gypsum. (2) CaB3O3(OH)5 4H2O. Occurrence: Along fractures and nodular in sedimentary borate deposits; may be authigenic in playa sediments. Association: Meyerhofferite, colemanite, priceite, hydroboracite, ulexite, gypsum. Distribution: In the USA, in California, from an adit on Mount Blanco, Furnace Creek district, Death Valley, Inyo Co., and in the Kramer borate deposit, Boron, Kern Co. -
Crystal Structure and Magnetic Properties of the New Zn1. 5Co1
Crystal Structure and Magnetic Properties of the New Zn1.5Co1.5B7O13Br Boracite Roberto Escudero∗ and Francisco Morales Instituto de Investigaciones en Materiales, Universidad Nacional Aut´onoma de M´exico. A. Postal 70-360. M´exico, D.F., 04510 MEXICO.´ Marco A Leyva Ramirez Departamento de Qu´ımica, Centro de Investigaci´on y Estudios Avanzados del IPN. 07360, M´exico, D. F. Jorge Campa-Molina and S. Ulloa-Godinez C. Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenieras, Universidad de Guadalajara, Laboratorio de Materiales Avanzados Departamento de Electronica. 044840, Guadalajara, Jalisco. MEXICO.´ (Dated: August 29, 2021) arXiv:1106.5446v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 27 Jun 2011 1 Abstract New Zn1.5Co1.5B7O13Br boracite crystals were grown by chemical transport reactions in quartz ampoules, at a temperature of 1173 K. The crystal structure was characterized by X-ray diffraction. The crystals present an orthorhombic structure with space group Pca21, (No. 29). The determined cell parameters were: a = 8.5705(3)A,˚ b = 8.5629(3) A,˚ and c = 12.1198(4)A,˚ and cell volume, V = 889.45(5) A˚3 with Z = 4. Magnetic properties in single crystals of the new boracite, were determined. The Susceptibility-Temperature (χ−T ) behavior at different magnetic intensities was studied. The inverse of the magnetic susceptibility χ−1(T ) shows a Curie-Weiss characteristic with spin s = 3/2 and a small orbital contribution, l. At low temperatures, below 10 K, χ(T ) shows irreversibility that is strongly dependent on the applied magnetic field. This boracite is ferrimag- netic up to a maximum temperature of about 16 K, as shows the coercive field. -
Rocks and Minerals Make up Your World
Rocks and Minerals Make up Your World Rock and Mineral 10-Specimen Kit Companion Book Presented in Partnership by This mineral kit was also made possible through the generosity of the mining companies who supplied the minerals. If you have any questions or comments about this kit please contact the SME Pittsburgh Section Chair at www.smepittsburgh.org. For more information about mining, visit the following web sites: www.smepittsburgh.org or www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining Updated August 2011 CONTENTS Click on any section name to jump directly to that section. If you want to come back to the contents page, you can click the page number at the bottom of any page. INTRODUCTION 3 MINERAL IDENTIFICATION 5 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES 6 FUELS 10 BITUMINOUS COAL 12 ANTHRACITE COAL 13 BASE METAL ORES 14 IRON ORE 15 COPPER ORE 16 PRECIOUS METAL ORE 17 GOLD ORE 18 ROCKS AND INDUSTRIAL MINERALS 19 GYPSUM 21 LIMESTONE 22 MARBLE 23 SALT 24 ZEOLITE 25 INTRODUCTION The effect rocks and minerals have on our daily lives is not always obvious, but this book will help explain how essential they really are. If you don’t think you come in contact with minerals every day, think about these facts below and see if you change your mind. • Every American (including you!) uses an average of 43,000 pounds of newly mined materials each year. • Coal produces over half of U.S. electricity, and every year you use 3.7 tons of coal. • When you talk on a land-line telephone you’re holding as many as 42 different minerals, including aluminum, beryllium, coal, copper, gold, iron, limestone, silica, silver, talc, and wollastonite. -
Ulexite Nacab5o6(OH)6 • 5H2O C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1 Crystal Data: Triclinic
Ulexite NaCaB5O6(OH)6 • 5H2O c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Triclinic. Point Group: 1. Rare as measurable crystals, which may have many forms; typically elongated to acicular along [001], to 5 cm, then forming fibrous cottonball-like masses; in compact parallel fibrous veins, and radiating and compact nodular groups. Twinning: Polysynthetic on {010} and {100}; possibly also on {340}, {230}, and others. Physical Properties: Cleavage: On {010}, perfect; on {110}, good; on {110}, poor. Fracture: Uneven across fiber groups. Tenacity: Brittle. Hardness = 2.5 D(meas.) = 1.955 D(calc.) = 1.955 Slightly soluble in H2O; parallel fibrous masses can act as fiber optical light pipes; may fluoresce yellow, greenish yellow, cream, white under SW and LW UV. Optical Properties: Transparent to opaque. Color: Colorless; white in aggregates, gray if included with clays. Luster: Vitreous; silky or satiny in fibrous aggregates. Optical Class: Biaxial (+). Orientation: X (11.5◦,81◦); Y (100◦,21.5◦); Z (107◦,70◦) [with c (0◦,0◦) and b∗ (0◦,90◦) using (φ,ρ)]. α = 1.491–1.496 β = 1.504–1.506 γ = 1.519–1.520 2V(meas.) = 73◦–78◦ Cell Data: Space Group: P 1. a = 8.816(3) b = 12.870(7) c = 6.678(1) α =90.36(2)◦ β = 109.05(2)◦ γ = 104.98(4)◦ Z=2 X-ray Powder Pattern: Jenifer mine, Boron, California, USA. 12.2 (100), 7.75 (80), 6.00 (30), 4.16 (30), 8.03 (15), 4.33 (15), 3.10 (15b) Chemistry: (1) (2) B2O3 43.07 42.95 CaO 13.92 13.84 Na2O 7.78 7.65 H2O 35.34 35.56 Total 100.11 100.00 • (1) Suckow mine, Boron, California, USA. -
Origin of the Kramer Borax Deposit, Boron, CA
A 50 year retrospective 1 OUTLINE 1. A brief history of borax 2. Kramer borax deposit a) Setting and Discovery b) Mineralogy of sedimentary borates c) Stratigraphy and Lithology d) Petrography and implications for geologic setting e) Solubility studies and modeling lake characteristics f) Comparable modern analogues 3. New evidence a) Turkish and Argentinian deposits b) Boron isotopic studies 4. Broader questions – Source water controls (thermal springs), B-As-Sb association, igneous-metamorphic controls on boron in thermal waters 2 Why give this talk? 1. Old (but rusty) material to me, new to most of you 2. Desire to see if ideas have changed in the past 50+ years. 3. Citation of my work even today suggests I did something right. 4. Wish to compare Kramer work with evidence from newer borate deposits in Turkey and South America 5. A wish to evaluate these ideas in light of new evidence using tools that weren’t available in 1964 6. A chance to ponder broader questions about boron’s geochemical cycle. 7. Work done so long ago that if you ask penetrating questions I can always plead a “senior moment” 3 What was unique about my research on the Kramer deposits? • Used a combination of geological tools (Field AND lab work – rare in 1964) • Stratigraphy, Petrography, and XRD based mineralogy • Experimental solubility studies of effects of other salts on Na-borate solubilities • Field studies of other possible borate environments (Borax Lake, Teels and Columbus Marsh, NV, Death Valley, Searles Lake) • Benefits of discussions with an all-star support team with similar interests (Mary Clark, Blair Jones, G.I. -
Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece
Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece Vol. 40, 2007 A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE COLEMANITE- RICH TUFF LAYER FROM THE SOURIDES AREA, KARLOVASSI BASIN, SAMOS ISLAND, HELLAS Kantiranis N. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Sciences, School of Geology, Department of Min eralogy-Petrology-Economic Geology Filippidis A. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Sciences, School of Geology, Department of Min eralogy-Petrology-Economic Geology Stamatakis M. National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Faculty of Geology and Geoenvironment, Department of Economic Geology and Geochemistry Tzamos E. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Sciences, School of Geology, Department of Min eralogy-Petrology-Economic Geology Drakoulis A. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Sciences, School of Geology, Department of Min eralogy-Petrology-Economic Geology https://doi.org/10.12681/bgsg.16717 Copyright © 2018 N. Kantiranis, A. Filippidis, M. Stamatakis, E. Tzamos, A. Drakoulis To cite this article: http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 20/02/2020 23:19:58 | Kantiranis, N., Filippidis, A., Stamatakis, M., Tzamos, E., & Drakoulis, A. (2007). A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE COLEMANITE-RICH TUFF LAYER FROM THE SOURIDES AREA, KARLOVASSI BASIN, SAMOS ISLAND, HELLAS. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Greece, 40(2), 769-774. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/bgsg.16717 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 20/02/2020 23:19:58 | Δελτίο της Ελληνικής Γεωλογικής Εταιρίας τομ.