1 Pilot Activities Granted by the Programming Committee On
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
FPDL Annual Report – 2005
PARTNERS FOUNDATION FOR LOCAL DEVELOPMENT - FPDL PART 2: ANNUAL REPORT 2005 2005 ACTIVITIES SUMMARY 2005 INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS REGIONAL PROGRAM “WORKING TOGETHER” • Local Elected Leadership TOT, Sinaia, Romania • Building Capacity For Transparent Cities Manual Development and Expert Meeting for Training Manual field test, Iceland • Ethnic Diversity and Conflict Management- EDCM TOT • 8th Annual Trainers Meeting OTHER INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMS • Citizen Participation, USAID, IREX Project in Moldova o Visioning Conference o Communication and Facilitation Skills, o Advanced Facilitation and Communication o Conflict Management in Participatory Planning o Coalition Building and Advocacy Skills o Trainers’ Workshop • UN Habitat, SIRP Program in Serbia o Conflict Management Basic Skills, Karlovci, Serbia & Montenegro o Participatory Practices in Planning and Decision Making Processes, Grocka, Serbia & Montenegro o 3 new Brochures in the “30 minutes learning” series • Series of TOTs for GTZ Program - Promotion of Democratic Youth Culture in Serbia o Ethnic Diversity and Conflict Management, Novi Sad, Serbia & Montenegro o Participatory Planning, Novi Sad, Serbia & Montenegro • TOT with Pilot Workshop on Public Service Management, Ohrid, Macedonia • Advocacy and Minority Rights TOT, Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herzegovina • Assessing the Capacity of 5 NGOs from Republic of Moldova • Regional Workshop on TOOLKIT for Citizen Participation 2005 NATIONAL PROGRAMS • Supporting Romania’s Accession to EU • Capacity Building Program for Youth Serving NGOs in Romania -
TOP SOVIET ERA EXPERIENCES in MOLDOVA Day 1: Arrival Day And
TOP SOVIET ERA EXPERIENCES IN MOLDOVA DAY 1 Day 1: Arrival day and Chisinau city tour On arrival at Chisinau International Airport, you will be transferred to your accommodation in Chisinau. After settling in, you will enjoy the city tour of Chisinau. During the tour, you will discover the main historical and cultural sights such as the Nativity of Christ Cathedral, the Bell Tower, the Arch of Triumph, the Monument of Stephen the Great, etc. You will also see some soviet buildings and apartment blocks, such as Circus building, Romanita Collective Housing Tower, Library din Hol, Soviet Memorial to Communist Youth, Chisinau Hotel (an excellent example of Stalinist Empire style architecture), etc. After lunch, you will have an excursion at the Eternity Memorial Complex and the Military Museum. The Eternity Memorial Complex is a memorial located in Chisinau dedicated to soviet soldiers who died in the battles of the Second World War. The Military Museum has displays of Moldova's past military campaigns and, in a park outside, a small open-air military exhibition displaying Soviet- made tanks, fighter planes and other military toys inherited by Moldova's armed forces. Next, you will have an excursion at Chisinau Railway Station built on 15 August 1871. The 2nd World War destroyed the station building, as it was blown up by the Red army in 1941. It was partially restored in 1944, but air attacks destroyed it once again. In 1948, the station was rebuilt. In 1990 at the Station’s Square there was unveiled a temporary stone commemorating the Victims of Stalinist Repression and mass deportations in Soviet Moldova in 1940-1951 - the Train of Pain. -
Agricultural Value-Chains Assessment Report April 2020.Pdf
1 2 ABOUT THE EUROPEAN UNION The Member States of the European Union have decided to link together their know-how, resources and destinies. Together, they have built a zone of stability, democracy and sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity, tolerance and individual freedoms. The European Union is committed to sharing its achievements and its values with countries and peoples beyond its borders. ABOUT THE PUBLICATION: This publication was produced within the framework of the EU Green Agriculture Initiative in Armenia (EU-GAIA) project, which is funded by the European Union (EU) and the Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC), and implemented by the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Armenia. In the framework of the European Union-funded EU-GAIA project, the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) hereby agrees that the reader uses this manual solely for non-commercial purposes. Prepared by: EV Consulting CJSC © 2020 Austrian Development Agency. All rights reserved. Licensed to the European Union under conditions. Yerevan, 2020 3 CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 5 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 6 2. OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT DYNAMICS OF AGRICULTURE IN ARMENIA AND GOVERNMENT PRIORITIES..................................................................................................................................................... -
Business Process Outsourcing Connecting with New Markets
Business Process Outsourcing Connecting with new markets Edition 2017/2018 KEY FACTS Official name: Inflation rate, 2016: The Republic of Moldova 6.4 % Autonomous Territorial Unit of Gagauzia (ATU) Unique tax of 7% for IT park residents Area: 1,848 km² Corporate tax: in Free Economic Zones: 12 % 6%, 0% Population: 162,000 inhabitants VAT: in Free Economic Zones: 20%, 8% 0% Language: Gagauzian (Turkic Language Family), Employment rate: Russian and Romanian are most 32% commonly spoken languages in Gagauzia The average gross monthly wage in IT sector:* Capital of ATU Gagauzia: 650 EUR Comrat (26,200 inhabitants) Currency: Moldovan Leu (MDL) *Source: www.statistica.md CONTENT Key Facts 1 Why bussiness process outsoursing to Gagauzia? 3 Bussines process outsourcing (BPO) and ICT 5 Telecommunications 8 Telephony 9 Internet 9 Incentives in ICT sector 11 Bussiness partners 12 Association of ICT companies 12 Invest in Moldova & Invest Gagauzia help you 13 WHY BUSINESS PROCESS OUTSOURCING TO GAGAUZIA? Human capital • Gagauzia is an autonomous region of the Republic of Moldova. The region has a population of 162,000 inhabitants. Comrat municipality is the administrative center of Autonomous Territorial Unit with 23,556 inhabitants. Over 80 percent of the total population speaks Gagauz language which is closely linked to Turkic language family. That enables Gagauz people to speak and understand Turkish and Azerbaijani languages. Russian and Romanian are second most spoken languages in Gagauzia. English is widely spoken and understood by the youth; • Work force – the employable population constitutes 104.8 thousand people, which make up for 64.8 % of total population; • Yearly, circa 750 students graduate from the State University of Comrat, two colleges and three vocational schools. -
CBD Sixth National Report
SIXTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity EXECUTIVE SUMMERY The issues concerning the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity of the Republic of Armenia are an important and integral part of the country's environmental strategy that are aimed at the prevention of biodiversity loss and degradation of the natural environment, ensuring the biological diversity and human well- being. Armenia's policy in this field is consistent with the following goals set out in the 2010-2020 Strategic Plan of the Convention on Biological Diversity (hereinafter CBD): 1. Address the underlying causes of biodiversity loss by mainstreaming biodiversity across government and society 2. Reduce the direct pressures on biodiversity and promote sustainable use 3. To improve the status of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic diversity 4. Enhance the benefits to all from biodiversity and ecosystem services (hereinafter ES) 5. Enhance implementation through participatory planning, knowledge management and capacity building. The government of the Republic of Armenia approved ''the Strategy and National Action Plan of the Republic of Armenia on Conservation, Protection, Reproduction and Use of Biological Diversity'' (BSAP) in 2015 based on the CBD goals and targets arising thereby supporting the following directions of the strategy of the Republic of Armenia on biodiversity conservation and use: 2 Sixth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity 1. Improvement of legislative and institutional frameworks related to biodiversity. 2. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem conservation and restoration of degraded habitats. 3. Reduction of the direct pressures on biodiversity and promotion of sustainable use. -
General Overview of the Local Self
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA LOCAL GOVERNMENT REFORM IN ARMENIA: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS FOR SUCCESS A MASTER’S ESSAY SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE COLLEGE OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES FOR PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS BY ARPINE VARDANYAN YEREVAN, ARMENIA MAY 2014 SIGNATURE PAGE Faculty Advisor: Arthur Drampian Date Dean: Douglas Shumavon Date American University of Armenia May 2014 2 CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 1: PROBLEM STATEMENT AND METHODOLOGY ............................................ 6 BACKGROUND AND OUTLINE OF THE PROBLEM .......................................................... 6 HYPOTHESES ........................................................................................................................... 9 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ...................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER 3: GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN ARMENIA ... 19 3.1. ADMINISTRATIVE-TERRITORIAL DIVISION AND GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE OF THE COUNTRY ........................................................................................ 19 3.2. CURRENT ISSUES IN THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN ARMENIA ..................... 20 3.3. FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS IN ARMENIA ............................................................................................................................... -
Moldova's National Minorities: Why Are They Euroskeptical?
Moldova’s National Minorities: Why are they Euroskeptical? Marcin Kosienkowski William Schreiber November 2014 Russia/NIS Center Ifri is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental and a non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European debate. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debates and research activities. The opinions expressed in this article are the authors’ alone and do not reflect the official views of their institutions. Russia/NIS Center © All rights reserved – Ifri – Paris, 2014 ISBN: 978-2-36567-330-3 IFRI IFRI-Bruxelles 27 RUE DE LA PROCESSION RUE MARIE-THERESE, 21 75740 PARIS CEDEX 15 – FRANCE 1000 BRUXELLES, BELGIQUE TEL. : 33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 TEL. : 32(2) 238 51 10 FAX : 33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 FAX : 32 (2) 238 51 15 E-MAIL : [email protected] E-MAIL : [email protected] WEBSITE : www.ifri.org Russie.Nei.Visions Russie.Nei.Visions is an online collection of articles dedicated to the study of Russia and other former Soviet states (Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan). Written by leading experts, these policy-oriented papers deal with strategic, political and economic issues. -
Development of a River Basin Management Plan for Hrazdan River Basin
European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) Results 2 & 3 DEVELOPMENT OF A RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR HRAZDAN RIVER BASIN CONSULTATION ON THE PROGRAMME OF MEASURES APPENDIX 1 ANALYSIS OF QUESTIONNAIRES FOR LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT BODIES Version 1, 28 September 2020 APPENDIX 1 ANALYSIS OF THE HRAZDAN BASIN PUBLIC CONSULTATION QUESTIONNAIRES FOR LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT BODIES EUWI+ PROJECT: "COMMUNICATION ASSISTANCE TO SUPPORT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ACTION PLAN FOR PARTICIPATIVE RBM PLANNING IN ARMENIA" Within the framework of the European Union Water Initiative Plus (EUWI+) programme, the process of developing Hrazdan and Sevan basin management plans started in 2018. The process of public discussion and consultation of the Hrazdan Basin Management Plan took place from 20 June to 20 August 2020. The Water Basin Management Plan is a guidance document developed as a result of collaboration between different stakeholders, offering common solutions to meet the needs of all water users, taking into account also the needs of the environment. Public participation plays a key role in the management plan development process. Questionnaires were used as a key tool in the public discussion and consulting process, through which expert opinions and information were collected to make additions to the water basin management plan. The questionnaires were disseminated through Gegharkunik Marzpetaran, the official website of the Ministry of Environment of the RA, the official website of EUWI+, the social networks of the CWP, as well as various CSO networks. The questionnaire was filled in by local self-government bodies (LSGB) representing 52 communities (57 questionnaires) and by non-governmental stakeholders in the basin – 134 questionnaires .A total of 191 questionnaires were completed. -
AM 15SC Decisions EN.Pdf
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15th MEETING OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE OF THE NATIONAL POLICY DIALOGUE ON WATER SECTOR ISSUES IN ARMENIA April 26, 2016 Yerevan, Armenia The 15th Meeting of the Steering Committee (SC) of the National Policy Dialogue (NPD) on Water Sector Issues in Armenia was chaired by Mr. Volodya Narimanyan, Deputy Head of the State Committee on Water Systems (SCWS) of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Armenia. 15th Meetings of the Steering Committee of the NPD on Water Sector Issues in Armenia The objective of the meeting was to discuss the status of NPD activities and recent developments in water sector of Armenia, as well as the progress in implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) principles in Armenia. The meeting also served as platform for establishing synergies with other international water projects implemented in Armenia. In the opening session Mr. Narimanyan welcomed the participants of the meeting, and presented the main points of the agenda. The SC members adopted the agenda as it was presented. Opening statement were made by Mr. John Barker from the Delegation of the European Union (EU) to Armenia, Ms. Tatiana Efimova from Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)/Environmental Action Programme (EAP) Task Force Secretariat, and Mr. Peep Mardiste from the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). In his remarks Mr. Barker welcomed the participants of the meeting, and stressed the importance of the platform, which the NPD is serving for. He also mentioned about the European Investment Bank loan of 30.7 mln Euro for financing the improvement of the quality and reliability of water supply services and the upgrading of wastewater treatment in Armenia, and the planned grant of 15 mln Euro within the EU Neighbourhood Investment Facility. -
Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia
SAMVEL AVETISYAN AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PROCESSING IN ARMENIA YEREVAN 2010 Dedicated to the memory of the author’s son, Sergey Avetisyan Approved for publication by the Scientifi c and Technical Council of the RA Ministry of Agriculture Peer Reviewers: Doctor of Economics, Prof. Ashot Bayadyan Candidate Doctor of Economics, Docent Sergey Meloyan Technical Editor: Doctor of Economics Hrachya Tspnetsyan Samvel S. Avetisyan Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia – Limush Publishing House, Yerevan 2010 - 138 pages Photos courtesy CARD, Zaven Khachikyan, Hambardzum Hovhannisyan This book presents the current state and development opportunities of the Armenian agriculture. Special importance has been attached to the potential of agriculture, the agricultural reform process, accomplishments and problems. The author brings up particular facts in combination with historic data. Brief information is offered on leading agricultural and processing enterprises. The book can be a useful source for people interested in the agrarian sector of Armenia, specialists, and students. Publication of this book is made possible by the generous fi nancial support of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and assistance of the “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. The contents do not necessarily represent the views of USDA, the U.S. Government or “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. INTRODUCTION Food and Agriculture sector is one of the most important industries in Armenia’s economy. The role of the agrarian sector has been critical from the perspectives of the country’s economic development, food safety, and overcoming rural poverty. It is remarkable that still prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, Armenia made unprecedented steps towards agrarian reforms. -
Towards a National Strategy for Sustainable Sanitation in Armenia
Towards a National Strategy for Sustainable Sanitation in Armenia DISCLAIMER This report has been developed within the framework of The European Union Water Initiative (EUWI) funded by the European Union, implemented by the OECD in partnership with UNECE. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. FOREWORD The project was implemented as part of the National Policy Dialogue (NPD) on water policy in Armenia conducted in co-operation with the European Union Water Initiative (EUWI) in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia and facilitated by the OECD and the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). The OECD commissioned Trémolet Consulting Limited (UK) jointly with JINJ Ltd. (Armenia), which included Sophie Trémolet, Lilit Melikyan, Kevin Tayler, Eduard Mesropyan and Aida Iskoyan, for the analytical work and whom are also the authors of this report. Tatiana Efimova at the OECD provided essential oversight and inputs. The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of participants of the EUWI National Policy Dialogue to the project and to this report, and would like to thank the State Committee of Water Systems of Armenia for a very productive co-operation. The authors thank Xavier Leflaive (OECD) for his valuable comments that helped improve both the content and structure of the report, and express their appreciation to Matthew Griffiths (OECD) for professional contributions to the project at its final stage. In addition, the authors thank Shukhrat Ziyaviddinov, Maria Dubois and Lupita Johanson (all OECD), for their valuable contribution to preparing publication of the report. The views presented in this report are those of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the Government of Armenia, the European Union, or the OECD and its member countries. -
Title: the December 7,1988 Armenia Earthquake Effects on Selected Power, Industrial and Commercial Fa Cilities
XA9952731 Title: The December 7,1988 Armenia earthquake effects on selected power, industrial and commercial fa cilities Contributor: R.D. Campbell Date: June 1995 (preparation date: January 1991) THE DECEMBER 7, 1988 ARMENIA EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS ON SELECTED POWER, INDUSTRIAL, AND COMMERCIAL FACILITIES Prepared for: ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE 3412 Hi 11 view Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94303 Prepared by: Michael J. Griffin Leo J. Bragagnoio Peter I. Yanev January 1991 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors and the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) would like to thank the following organizations and individuals for their cooperation and assistance in the investigations of the Armenia Earthquake. Thanks are extended to the U.S. Academy of Sciences and the Soviet Academy of Sciences for their joint sponsorship of the U.S. Investigative Team, with special thanks extended to the following team members: Dr. John Filson, Dr. Armen Der Kiureghian, Dr. Fred Krimgold, Dr. Thomas O'Rourke, and Dr. Robert Sharp. Additional thanks are extended to Dr. N. N. Ambraseys of Imperial College of Science and Technology in London, Mr. Waverly Person of the U.S. Geological Survey, and Dr. Lloyd S. Cluff of Pacific Gas and Electric Company. Thanks are also extended to Mr. Michael G. Melkumian and translator Ms. Susi of the Armenian Scientific Research Institute of Civil Engineering and Architecture in Yerevan, Armenian SSR, USSR, who were instrumental in obtaining information during the second investigative effort. The authors and EPRI would also like to thank Mr. Hevhanisjan Sewada of the Soviet Academy of Sciences, Leninakan, and Mr. Ruslan Martizasian of the Institute of Geophysics, Leninakan, who most graciously accommodated our requests during the second investigative effort.