Reports and Responded to Members‘ Questions and Comments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reports and Responded to Members‘ Questions and Comments EAST (OUTER) AREA COMMITTEE 16TH FEBRUARY 2005 PRESENT: Councillor Parker in the Chair Councillors Armitage, Grahame, Gruen, Harrison, J Lewis, Phillips, Murray, Schofield and Wakefield 52 Chair,s Opening Remarks The Chair welcomed every to the meeting especially those members of the public who were in attendance at the meeting. The Chair also announced that the presentation by Councillor Jennings, Executive Board Member for Childrens Services has been withdrawn from the today‘s agenda and he will now arrange a briefing with Officers on this matter. 53 Late Item The Chair gave notice of a late item of urgent business, Minute No. 60 refers, which relates to the Area Delivery Plan report. The Chair indicated that in accordance with his powers under Section 100(B)(4)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972, he had agreed to take this report as late item of urgent business in order that the Board be furnished with an updated version of the Area Delivery Plan. 54 Declarations of Interest There were no declarations of interest. 55 Minutes - 7th December 2004 Members agreed an amendment to Minute No. 48, Review of Leeds City Council Community Centres to delete the last paragraph and include a resolution to read £ That the Director of Neighbourhoods and Housing be informed of this Area Committee‘s concern that the proposals on the review did not include automatic exemptions for those with the inability to pay nor give any detail as what the pricing structure may be and where the cost of any discretionary subsidy would be met from‘. RESOLVED £ That, subject to the above amendment, the minutes of the meeting held on 7th December 2004 be confirmed as a correct record. 56 Matters Arising from the Minutes Referring to Minute No. 47 relating to the Leeds Regeneration Plan, Members expressed a wish to have sight of the draft plan and the Area Manager informed the meeting that the draft plan should be available to all Members for them to comment on. It is anticipated that the final Plan will not be available until June 2005. The Chair informed the meeting that he had been in correspondence with Parish Councillors and asked them to submit their comments to him in order that they can be included in the Plan before it has been finalised. To date the Chair has not received a response from the Parish Councillors. Draft Minutes to be approved at the meeting PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory trial version http://www.fineprint.com to be held on 21st April 2005 The East Area Manager suggested that once Members had received the draft Plan a special meeting of the Area Committee could be arranged or, alternatively, Members could submit their own comments in writing. Referring to Minute No. 48 relating to the Review of Leeds City Council Community Centres, the East Area Manager informed the meeting that the review will not be completed until June 2005 but he will keep Members up to date, particularly those affected by Community Centre issues for both the East Inner and Outer Area Committees. The Chair informed the meeting that he had been approached by people using the Community Centres in his Ward and they are now expressing great concern about what the costs will be, which may result in these groups having to look for an alternative venue. The East Area Manager informed the meeting that Area Committees may be able to subsidise groups out of their own budget but that will have to be reflected in the finalised plan for Community Centres across the city. RESOLVED - That an updated report on the Leeds Regeneration Plan be submitted to the June 2005 East Outer Area Committee meeting. 57 Theme Focus - Youth Service The Director of Learning and Leisure submitted a detailed report and appendix to update the Area Committee on general Leeds Youth Service developments, progress and current issues. Phil Pearce, Operations Manager, Youth Service presented the report and responded to Members‘ questions and comments. RESOLVED: (a) That the contents of the report be noted (b) That the Executive Board Members for Neighbourhoods and Housing be invited to the next Area Committee meeting. (c) That a progress report on the Halton Moor Chill Out Centre be submitted to the next Area Committee meeting. (d) That all Members of the Area Committee be furnished with a progress report on the pilot programme targeting young people in rural areas. 58 Neighbourhood Management Proposals The Director of Neighbourhoods and Housing submitted a report for Members information on the main principles of Neighbourhood Management, the proposed geographic boundaries of Neighbourhood Management Teams and proposals to support this project from the Wellbeing Budget. Martin Hackett, East Area Management, presented the report and together with John Woolmer, responded to Members‘ questions and comments. RESOLVED - Draft Minutes to be approved at the meeting to be held on 21st April 2005 PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory trial version http://www.fineprint.com (a) That the main principles of Neighbourhood Management and the proposed geographic boundaries of the Neighbourhood Management Teams as outlined in the submitted report be noted. (b) That the East Outer Area Committee noted the request to support this project from the Wellbeing Budget. 59 Wellbeing Budget The East Area Manager submitted a report to the Committee in relation to: (a) Small Grants (b) Large Grants Martin Hackett, Area Management Officer presented the reports and responded to Members‘ questions and comments. RESOLVED: (a) That the contents of the report be noted (b) That approval be given to release the following funds from the East Outer Area Committee budget: Gardening Scheme “ 36,750 Luncheon Club Co-ordinator 18,000 Methley Security Barrier 600 Neighbourhood Management Budget 6,000 Garforth Festival 2,000 TOTAL ‘63,350 (c) That the East Outer Area Committee noted that approval of the above projects will fully commit the Revenue Budget for 2004/2005. (c) Capital Spend The Area Committee also considered the tabled late item of urgent business in relation to an application to fund a fencing project at Firthfield Community Centre, Garforth. RESOLVED - (a) That the Area Committee noted the two routes as outlined in the submitted report, through which capital schemes may receive support. (b) That the Area Committee noted that Members should raise with the East Area Manager any proposals or ideas for support from the Area Committee‘s Wellbeing Budget by no later than 28th February 2005, (c) That it was noted that the opportunity to raise ideas or schemes with the Area Management Team may be put forward as a possibility for funding from the Capital Programme. (d) That approval be given to the application for “ 8,750 from the capital budget to fund the fencing project at Firthfields Community Centre, Garforth. 60 Late Item - Area Delivery Plan 2005/2006 Draft Minutes to be approved at the meeting PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory trial version http://www.fineprint.com to be held on 21st April 2005 The East Area Manager tabled a report with the most up to date information on the progress made in developing the East Outer Area Delivery Plan for 2005/2006. Stephen Boyle, East Area Manager, together with John Woolmer, Area Co-ordinator, East Area Management presented the report and responded to Members‘ questions and comments. RESOLVED: (a) That the contents of the report be noted. (b) That approval be given to the Outline Area Delivery Plan for 2005/2006 for submission to the Executive Board as being: · the area wide priorities set out in Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of the report. · the area service plans of Youth Services, Streetscene Services and Community Safety. · the ”Making It Real– framework and its evolvement as set out in Section 3. · the community engagement/consultation framework and strategy. (c) That the East Area Management Team be instructed to: · meet with Local Ward Members to discuss their priorities for inclusion in the relevant ”Making It Real– sections. · undertake a consultation exercise with the Forums on the priorities suggested and detail contained within their ”Making it Real– section. · obtain further information from service providers on local commitments they are able to make which meet the area priorities and activities set out in sections 2.1 and 2.2 of the report and any local priorities identified within each ”Making it Real– section. · bring back updated versions of the ”Making it Real– sections to the next available meeting to agree as the starting point for 2005/2006. (d) That a further report be submitted to the next meeting to provide examples and an explanation of the area performance monitoring reports that will be provided to Area Committee by Youth Services and Leeds Community Safety during 2005/2006 61 A-Boards Enforcement The Director of City Services submitted a report on the proposed policy and related conditions in respect of A-Boards and other similar advertising boards displayed by businesses for advertising purposes. Helen Finister, Chief Streetscene Officer presented the report and responded to Members‘ questions and comments. RESOLVED - That the proposed policy be endorsed. 62 Primary School Replacement Programmes - Disposal of Surplus School Buildings Draft Minutes to be approved at the meeting to be held on 21st April 2005 PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory trial version http://www.fineprint.com The Director of Development submitted a report to advise the Area Committee of the proposed disposal of surplus school properties arising from the primary school replacement programmes and the potential uses of the sites to be sold. RESOLVED - That the proposals outlined in the report to dispose of surplus school properties and the associated planning land use guidance be noted.
Recommended publications
  • List of Yorkshire and Humber Schools
    List of Yorkshire and Humber Schools This document outlines the academic and social criteria you need to meet depending on your current secondary school in order to be eligible to apply. For APP City/Employer Insights: If your school has ‘FSM’ in the Social Criteria column, then you must have been eligible for Free School Meals at any point during your secondary schooling. If your school has ‘FSM or FG’ in the Social Criteria column, then you must have been eligible for Free School Meals at any point during your secondary schooling or be among the first generation in your family to attend university. For APP Reach: Applicants need to have achieved at least 5 9-5 (A*-C) GCSES and be eligible for free school meals OR first generation to university (regardless of school attended) Exceptions for the academic and social criteria can be made on a case-by-case basis for children in care or those with extenuating circumstances. Please refer to socialmobility.org.uk/criteria-programmes for more details. If your school is not on the list below, or you believe it has been wrongly categorised, or you have any other questions please contact the Social Mobility Foundation via telephone on 0207 183 1189 between 9am – 5:30pm Monday to Friday. School or College Name Local Authority Academic Criteria Social Criteria Abbey Grange Church of England Academy Leeds 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM Airedale Academy Wakefield 4 7s or As at GCSE FSM or FG All Saints Catholic College Specialist in Humanities Kirklees 4 7s or As at GCSE FSM or FG All Saints' Catholic High
    [Show full text]
  • Whitkirk School Report Appendix 080609.Mdi
    Business case April 2008 Managing Major Change- Business Case Establishment of Whitkirk Primary School as Project Title: Specialist Community Provision (PD & Complex Medical Needs) Project Champion: Carol Jordan Project Lead: Susan Morgan Project Manager: John Chadwick Author: John Chadwick Date: 28/5/09 Document Version: V2 Current Status: Draft 1 Business case April 2008 BUSINESS CASE 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposal is to establish Specialist Community Provision (SCP) at Whitkirk Primary School for pupils with complex physical difficulties and medical needs. The proposal addresses the issue of making provision locally to include children with special educational needs within mainstream settings. Numbers of children with physical disabilities (PD) in the city are rising (see paragraph 2) and parental demand for mainstream provision for the majority of these children is increasing. Currently Leeds has only one primary school catering for the needs of children with these complex needs which is inadequate to meet demand. Whitkirk Primary School is situated in the east of the city, an area with demand for this type of resource and where there is currently none. It offers space for the necessary facilities (after building adaptations) and has an ethos that fits with the operation of this type of provision. It is in close proximity to Temple Moor High school which will open in 2011 as new secondary provision for children with complex PD and medical needs. Provision at Whitkirk primary school alongside Temple Moor High School and Children’s Centres at Osmanthorpe, Meadowfield and Seacroft would complete a continuum of provision 0-19 consistent with proposals consulted upon in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Document Pack
    Public Document Pack SCRUTINY BOARD (CHILDREN'S SERVICES) Meeting to be held in Civic Hall, Leeds on Thursday, 8th February, 2007 at 9.30 am (A pre-meeting will take place for ALL members of the Board at 9.00 a.m.) MEMBERSHIP Councillors J Bale (Chair) - Guiseley and Rawdon J Chapman - Weetwood B Cleasby - Horsforth R D Feldman - Alwoodley A Harrison - Garforth and Swillington V Kendall - Roundhay J Lewis - Kippax and Methley L Mulherin - Ardsley and Robin Hood K Renshaw - Ardsley and Robin Hood B Selby - Killingbeck and Seacroft Co-opted Members (Voting) Mr E A Britten - Church Representative (Catholic) Prof P H J H Gosden - Church Representative (Church of England) Mr R Greaves - Parent Governor Representative (Secondary) Mr C Macpherson - Parent Governor Representative (Special) Mrs S Knights - Parent Governor Representative (Primary) Co-opted Members (Non-Voting) Mr T Hales - Teacher Representative Ms C Foote - Teacher Representative Mrs S Hutchinson - Early Years Development and Childcare Partnership Representative Mr P Gathercole - NCH Representative Ms T Kayani - Youth Work Partnership Representative Agenda compiled by: Gerard Watson Principal Scrutiny Advisor: Telephone: 247 4325 Kate Arscott Governance Services Tel: 247 4189 Civic Hall LEEDS LS1 1UR Produced on Recycled Paper A G E N D A Item Ward/Equal Item Not Page No Opportunities Open No 1 APPEALS AGAINST REFUSAL OF INSPECTION OF DOCUMENTS To consider any appeals in accordance with Procedure Rule 25 of the Access to Information Rules (in the event of an Appeal the press and
    [Show full text]
  • List of Eligible Schools for Website 2019.Xlsx
    England LEA/Establishment Code School/College Name Town 873/4603 Abbey College, Ramsey Ramsey 860/4500 Abbot Beyne School Burton‐on‐Trent 888/6905 Accrington Academy Accrington 202/4285 Acland Burghley School London 307/6081 Acorn House College Southall 931/8004 Activate Learning Oxford 307/4035 Acton High School London 309/8000 Ada National College for Digital Skills London 919/4029 Adeyfield School Hemel Hempstead 935/4043 Alde Valley School Leiston 888/4030 Alder Grange School Rossendale 830/4089 Aldercar High School Nottingham 891/4117 Alderman White School Nottingham 335/5405 Aldridge School ‐ A Science College Walsall 307/6905 Alec Reed Academy Northolt 823/6905 All Saints Academy Dunstable Dunstable 916/6905 All Saints' Academy, Cheltenham Cheltenham 301/4703 All Saints Catholic School and Technology College Dagenham 879/6905 All Saints Church of England Academy Plymouth 383/4040 Allerton Grange School Leeds 304/5405 Alperton Community School Wembley 341/4421 Alsop High School Technology & Applied Learning Specialist College Liverpool 358/4024 Altrincham College Altrincham 868/4506 Altwood CofE Secondary School Maidenhead 825/4095 Amersham School Amersham 380/4061 Appleton Academy Bradford 341/4796 Archbishop Beck Catholic Sports College Liverpool 330/4804 Archbishop Ilsley Catholic School Birmingham 810/6905 Archbishop Sentamu Academy Hull 306/4600 Archbishop Tenison's CofE High School Croydon 208/5403 Archbishop Tenison's School London 916/4032 Archway School Stroud 851/6905 Ark Charter Academy Southsea 304/4001 Ark Elvin Academy
    [Show full text]
  • School/College Name Post Code Group Size
    School/college name Post code Group Size 3D Morden College BD7 4EZ 2 Abbey Grange Church of England Academy LS16 5EA 180 Allerton Grange School LS17 6SF 50 Allerton High Business & Enterprise Specialist School LS17 7AG 150 Askham Bryan College YO23 3FR 53 Batley Girls High School WF17 OLD 110 Beckfoot School BD16 1EE 40 Beckfoot Thornton BD13 3BH 95 Bishop Burton College HU178QG 17 Bootham School YO30 7BU 70 Boroughbridge High School YO51 9JX 27 Bradford Academy BD4 7QJ 90 Bradford Girls Grammar School BD9 6RB 75 Breckenbrough School, Thirsk YO7 4EN 8 Brighouse High School HD6 2NY 100 Brigshaw High School and Language College, Leeds WF10 2HR 55 Brooksbank School HX50QG 130 Buttershaw Business & Enterprise College BD6 3PX 65 Caedmon College Whitby YO21 1LA 92 Calder High School HX75QN 35 Carlton Bolling College BD3 0DU 242 Co-op Academy Priesthorpe LS28 5SG 80 Craven College BD21 5DP 23 Crawshaw Academy LS28 9HU 43 Crossley Heath School HX30HG 130 Dixons City Academy BD5 7RR 155 Elliott Hudson College LS11 0LT 455 Ermysted's Grammar, Skipton BD23 1PL 135 Fulford School YO10 4FY 140 Fulneck School LS12 6JY 37 Garforth Academy LS25 1LJ 16 Gateways School LS17 9LE 18 Guiseley School, Leeds BD20 7AQ 80 Hanson Academy (formerly School) BD2 1JP 180 Horsforth School LS18 5RF 135 Huddersfield New College HD3 4GL 100 Ilkley Grammar School LS29 8TR 212 Immanuel College, Bradford BD10 9AQ 85 John Smeaton Community College, Leeds LS15 8TA 36 Joseph Rowntree School YO32 4BZ 75 King James's School, Knaresborough HG5 0JH 110 Kirklees College HD1 3LD 90
    [Show full text]
  • Temple Moor High School Science College
    Temple Moor High School Science College Lead Teacher of Psychology Recruitment Pack Temple Moor High School Science College Field End Grove Selby Road Leeds LS15 0PT West Yorkshire Telephone: 0113 390 0770 Fax: 0113 264 9394 Website: www.tmhs.co.uk Email: [email protected] Closing Date: Friday 24 March 2017 at 12 noon Contents Applicants’ Letter School Information Vision, Values and Philosophy Temple Newsam Learning Partnership – A Cooperative Trust Post and Person Specifications Applying for a Post at Temple Moor High School Science College Equal Opportunities Statement Recruitment of Ex-Offenders Policy Statement March 2017 Dear Applicant Lead Teacher of Psychology (Full/Part Time) Thank you for your interest in this post. I hope you will enjoy reading through our recruitment pack and I look forward to receiving your application. Please apply via a letter of application (no more than two sides of A4) and the completed application form. We do not accept CVs. Your completed application should be returned to the school to be received no later than 12 noon on Friday 24 March 2017. Yours faithfully M West Matthew West Principal ABOUT THE SCHOOL Temple Moor High School Science College is a foundation school for students aged 11-19. We have c1400 on roll at any time including Post 16. We are based in East Leeds, West Yorkshire and serve the local communities of Whitkirk, Colton, Austhorpe, Halton Moor and Crossgates predominantly but also draw many students from out of area. We are consistently oversubscribed with the majority of our students arriving from our local primary schools as part of our Temple Newsam Learning Partnership Co-operative Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Temple Moor High School Science College Assistant Principal
    Temple Moor High School Science College Assistant Principal Mathematics Recruitment Pack Temple Moor High School Science College Field End Grove Selby Road Leeds LS15 0PT West Yorkshire Telephone: 0113 390 0770 Fax: 0113 264 9394 Website: www.tmhs.co.uk Email: [email protected] Closing Date: Friday 19 May 2017 (12 noon) Contents Applicants’ Letter School Information Vision, Values and Philosophy Temple Newsam Learning Partnership – A Cooperative Trust Post and Person Specifications Further Post Information Applying for a Post at Temple Moor High School Science College Equal Opportunities Statement Recruitment of Ex-Offenders Policy Statement May 2017 Dear Applicant Subject Leader Mathematics Thank you for your interest in this post. I hope you will enjoy reading through our recruitment pack and I look forward to receiving your application. Please apply via a letter of application (no more than two sides of A4) and the completed application form. We do not accept CVs. Your completed application should be returned to the school to be received no later than 12 noon on Friday 19 May 2017. Yours faithfully M West Matthew West Principal ABOUT THE SCHOOL Temple Moor High School Science College is a foundation school for students aged 11-19. We have c1400 on roll at any time including Post 16. We are based in East Leeds, West Yorkshire and serve the local communities of Whitkirk, Colton, Austhorpe, Halton Moor and Crossgates predominantly but also draw many students from out of area. We are consistently oversubscribed with the majority of our students arriving from our local primary schools as part of our Temple Newsam Learning Partnership Co-operative Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Leedsdesign June09
    June 2009 This case study from an early BSF project DESIGN focuses on the first three schools built through Leeds City Council's BSF Wave 1 programme, and CABE’s contribution to the process. It examines the value of independent design review and collaborative design workshops. Key project information BSF CASE STUDIES: Number of schools in LA: 39 Wave 1 BSF programme began: 2005 Number of schools in first phase: 14 New build schools: Allerton High, Pudsey Grangefield, Rodillian (all open Sept 2008) Cockburn School (to open 2009-10) Refurbishment: Temple Moor High School/SILC (open Sept 2008), Allerton Grange School (to open 2009-10) © David Millington Photography Ltd Millington Photography © David The value of independent design advice: enabling design quality in Leeds BSF Project description those involved, encouraging a continuous creative process from all parties in the project. Leeds City Council is an experienced development • sharing a knowledge of school design, presenting client. It has built up a public private partnership team exemplars of good design and introducing of over 30 staff with considerable PFI expertise. The techniques for balancing and reviewing design/value council is a strong advocate of good design and retains options, including the use of CABE publications and its civic architect, who is able to advise the council design quality tools. across its capital programme. Education Leeds is a • supporting the local authority’s high design not-for-profit company owned by the council, formed in expectations by challenging bidder schemes that 2001 to deliver education support services in the city. It did not appear to have the potential to transform the was already an experienced education client, having schools and the activities in them.
    [Show full text]
  • Remote Desktop Redirected Printer
    England LEA/Establishment Code School/College Name Town 928/4007 Abbeyfield School Northampton 803/4000 Abbeywood Community School Bristol 931/8007 Abingdon and Witney College Abingdon 894/6906 Abraham Darby Academy Telford 888/6905 Accrington Academy Accrington 931/8004 Activate Learning Oxford 307/4035 Acton High School London 209/4600 Addey and Stanhope School London 919/4029 Adeyfield School Hemel Hempstead 935/4043 Alde Valley School Leiston 888/4030 Alder Grange Community and Technology School Rossendale 830/4089 Aldercar High School Nottingham 891/4117 Alderman White School Nottingham 336/5402 Aldersley High School Wolverhampton 307/6905 Alec Reed Academy Northolt 830/4001 Alfreton Grange Arts College Alfreton 823/6905 All Saints Academy Dunstable Dunstable 916/6905 All Saints' Academy, Cheltenham Cheltenham 357/4604 All Saints Catholic College Dukinfield 340/4615 All Saints Catholic High School Knowsley 373/5401 All Saints' Catholic High School Sheffield 879/6905 All Saints Church of England Academy Plymouth 383/4040 Allerton Grange School Leeds 304/5405 Alperton Community School Wembley 341/4421 Alsop High School Technology & Applied Learning Specialist College Liverpool 358/4024 Altrincham College of Arts Altrincham 868/4506 Altwood CofE Secondary School Maidenhead 825/4095 Amersham School Amersham 909/5407 Appleby Grammar School Appleby-in-Westmorland 380/6907 Appleton Academy Bradford 341/4781 Archbishop Blanch School Liverpool 330/4804 Archbishop Ilsley Catholic School Birmingham 810/6905 Archbishop Sentamu Academy Hull 306/4600
    [Show full text]
  • December 2020 FOI 6051-20 Police Officers in Schools
    Our ref: 6051/20 In relation to the discloure link https://www.westyorkshire.police.uk/sites/default/files/foi/2020-07/july_2020_foi_1715- 20_officers_in_schools.pdf Could I please just check one point: Could you specify the names of schools to which 43.65 officers were deployed in 2019-20? Please see the attached document. West Yorkshire Police have maintained engagement with schools through the Safer Schools Partnership, a national way of working to foster intensive and long-term engagement with the school community whether pupils, teachers, governors or parents. The partnership has seen members of the Force, usually police officers, but in some cases PCSOs, fulfil their operational duties in a school-based environment as a resident member of staff. The partnership has involved schools contributing a certain percentage of an officer’s/PCSOs salary in return for their work in the school. The precise percentage has varied from school to school. It also determines the percentage of time they spend at the school, so a 20% contribution may mean that an officer spends 1 day a week at the school. Leeds Bradford Wakefield Kirklees Coop Appleton Academy Kings School, Pontefract Hudd Uni Brigshaw Beckfoot School South Kirby Academy Kirklees College Beckfoot Upper Heaton (was Belle Vue Upton Primary All Saints Catholic Garforth/Delta Academies Boys) (Minsthorpe Feeder) College Corpus Christi Belle View Girls School Outwood Grange Pivot Outwood Academy Mount St Marys Bradford Academy Spen Valley Hemsworth Temple Moor High School Red Kite Whitcliffe
    [Show full text]
  • Temple Moor High School Science College Field End Grove, Selby Road, Leeds, LS15 0PT
    School report Temple Moor High School Science College Field End Grove, Selby Road, Leeds, LS15 0PT Inspection dates 19-20 March 2013 Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 Overall effectiveness This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2 Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school. Overall, students make good progress. The Disabled students and those who have special proportion of students gaining five or more educational needs make good progress GCSEs at grades A* to C, including English because the support they receive helps them and mathematics, has risen steadily over the to become more independent. last three years and is now above average. Senior leaders have made good improvements Teaching is good because teachers have in achievement and behaviour since the last good subject knowledge. Teachers in most inspection. Leaders work well with other subjects support students’ literacy skills well. schools and organisations to give students a Behaviour and safety are good. Attendance is wide range of learning opportunities. above average. Fixed-term exclusions are The governing body holds senior leaders to very low because support for students at risk account well for all aspects of the school’s of exclusion is outstanding. performance. Achievement in the sixth form is good. It is not yet an outstanding school because Achievement in modern languages is not as A minority of teaching still requires high as in other subjects. improvement. Teachers’ marking does not More-able students do not always attain the always give students enough information about higher grades that they could.
    [Show full text]
  • Temple Newsam Learning Partnership Cooperative Trust
    TEMPLE NEWSAM LEARNING PARTNERSHIP COOPERATIVE TRUST TNLP CLUSTER TEAM AND VOLUNTEER SAFEGUARDING AND CHILD PROTECTION POLICY AND PROCESSES JUNE 2017 TO JUNE 2018 1 All those who come into contact with children and young people have a duty to safeguard and promote the welfare of those children and young people. Safeguarding Procedures: Cluster Activities All those who come into contact with children and young people have a duty to safeguard and promote the welfare of those children and young people. The TNLP cluster team follow Children’s Services model Child Protection Policy for Education. Commissioned services will follow their own Child Protection policies and procedures (unless specified in the ABC Contract) and will notify the cluster of any incidents. The following procedures have been developed to assist those working in the cluster team, delivering cluster holiday club/ after school activities or commissioned services to work together to safeguard and promote the welfare of children and young people. They are designed to help you to be familiar with and follow our protocols for safeguarding the welfare of children and young people by being able to: Recognise symptoms of abuse and neglect Know what to do if you have a concern about a child or young person Understand the need for confidentiality Know key contact details for raising concerns about a child or young person Recognising the symptoms of abuse and neglect There are some behaviours that are commonly seen in children who are abused. These are intended to give an indication
    [Show full text]