DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Research in Hambleton District Council Area 2003

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community Research in Hambleton District Council Area 2003 Community Research in Hambleton District Council Area 2003 Research Study Conducted for The Boundary Committee for England October 2003 Contents Introduction 1 Executive Summary 4 Local Communities 6 Defining Communities 6 Identifying Communities 6 Identity with the Local Community in the Hambleton District Council Area 7 Overall Identity 7 Effective Communities 9 Involvement 13 Affective Communities 16 Bringing Effective and Affective Communities Together 17 Local Authority Communities 19 Belonging to Hambleton District Council Area 19 Belonging to North Yorkshire County Council Area 22 Knowledge and Attitudes towards Local Governance 25 Knowledge of Local Governance 25 Involvement with Local Governance 26 Administrative Boundary Issues 26 Appendices 1. Methodology – Quantitative 2. Methodology - Qualitative 3. Sub-Group Definitions 4. Place Name Gazetteer 5. Qualitative Topic Guide 6. Marked-up Questionnaire Community Research in Hambleton District Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Introduction Research Aims This report presents the findings of research conducted by the MORI Social Research Institute on behalf of The Boundary Committee for England (referred to in this report as "The Committee") in the Hambleton District Council area. The aim of this research is to establish the patterns of community identity in the area. Survey Coverage MORI has undertaken research in all 44 two-tier district or borough council areas in the North East, North West and Yorkshire and the Humber regions. The research covers two-tier local authority areas only; the results may however identify issues which overlap with adjacent areas. Reports and data for other two-tier areas are provided separately. Hambleton District Council (North Yorkshire CC) Stockton-on-Tees BC Middlesbrough BC Redcar & Darlington ClevelandBC BC Data is available from two-tier authorities in these County Council areas: Scarborough BC Cheshire Durham (North Yorksshire CC) Cumbria Lancashire Richmondshire BC Northumberland (North Yorkshire CC) North Yorkshire Hambleton DC (N Yorks CC) Ryedale DC (North Yorkshire CC) Harrogate BC Key: BC = Borough Council (N Yorkshire CC) DC = District Council CC = County Council City of York Council Source: MORI Methodology Both quantitative and qualitative research has been carried out in the Hambleton District Council area, as in each two-tier district council area in the Yorkshire and the Humber region. Quantitative research seeks to answer the question of ‘what’ residents think, by measuring their attitudes on a range of pre-set questions in the context of an interview, rather than holding an in-depth discussion on the issues involved. It provides statistically robust data. 1 Community Research in Hambleton District Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Within each two-tier district or borough council area, some 300 quantitative face- to-face interviews were carried out in-home between 19th June and 31st August 2003. A total of 2,171 interviews took place across all two-tier authorities in the North Yorkshire County Council area, with 307 interviews being conducted in the Hambleton District Council area. Quotas were set by age, gender and work status using 2001 Census data. Data have been weighted back to the known demographic profile of each district or borough council area by age and gender, and for aggregate county, regional and overall findings by the population size of each individual district or borough council area. Full computer tabulations have been provided separately. Qualitative research helps probe the thinking processes and feelings of residents, and attempts to answer the question as to ‘why?’ residents might feel the way they do. In the Hambleton District Council area, a qualitative discussion group was held to establish how residents feel about their local community. The findings from this group were analysed within the context of the findings from discussion groups in the other 43 district or borough council areas under consideration by this study. Discussion groups do not seek to offer statistical validity from a representative sample, but seek to explore attitudes and opinions in greater depth than the quantitative research allows. It should also be borne in mind that, in order to get an overview of the in-depth feelings in each area as well as explore linkages across the region, only one discussion group was held in each district or borough council area. The findings from each group should therefore be viewed in the context of the other discussion groups which have taken place, as well as the quantitative findings. This is because the findings from participants from just one discussion group may be unrepresentative of general opinion, and misleading if viewed out of context. Report Structure This report provides an overview of the findings from the research for the Hambleton District Council area. Individual summary reports for the research conducted within each of the other two-tier authorities in the Yorkshire and the Humber region have been issued under separate cover. Publication of the Data As part of our standard terms and conditions, the publication of the data in this report is subject to the advance approval of MORI. This would only be refused on the grounds of inaccuracy or misinterpretation of the findings. 2 Community Research in Hambleton District Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Contact Details The research was carried out by MORI for COI Communications, acting on behalf of The Boundary Committee for England. Simon Atkinson, Research Director, MORI Emma Holloway, Senior Research Executive, MORI Jaime Rose, Senior Research Executive, MORI Neil Wholey, Senior Research Executive, MORI 79-81 Borough Road London SE1 1FY Tel: 020 7347 3000 Fax: 020 7347 3800 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.mori.com 3 Community Research in Hambleton District Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Executive Summary • Residents in the Hambleton District Council area identify most strongly with their local neighbourhood/village and their town/nearest town. They show less identity with the administrative areas of the local two-tier councils. This is not an unusual finding, as people will generally identify with the immediate area where they have made their home, rather than a large geographical area. • The Hambleton District Council area is largely rural, with activity focused on the town of Northallerton. A third of residents (32%) most associate themselves with the town of Northallerton, while around one in nine (11%) associate themselves with the Hambleton town of Thirsk. However, more (15%) associate themselves with Middlesbrough to the north, in the neighbouring Middlesbrough Metropolitan Council area. • "Effective Communities" are the sense of place created by visiting practical locations which cater for shopping or leisure needs, work place, or where parents take their children to school. Within the district, Northallerton is a clear focus – centrally located for the northern half of the district. Thirsk (to the south) and Stokeley (on the northern border) are other important towns. However, Middlesbrough, just to the north, is also important – indeed more important than any Hambleton town for clothes and household goods shopping, as is York, to the south of the district. • "Affective Communities" describes the sense of place created by residents forming an emotional attachment to a community. Identity with the local neighbourhood is naturally stronger for those who take part in community activities. • Overall, four in five (79%) Hambleton District Council residents feel they belong to a local area or community within this council area. This is one of the highest proportions in comparison with other district or borough council areas in the North Yorkshire County Council area. Nevertheless, participants in the discussion group saw broad commonalities of interest with districts to the east and west. They did not associate themselves with the cities to the north and south, notwithstanding the fact that they perform many of their household activities there. 4 Community Research in Hambleton District Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Interpreting the Findings • Neither the qualitative nor the quantitative research should be taken in isolation of the other, and nor should the findings of one district, borough, county or region be taken in isolation of the overall perspective provided by research in other areas. Just as residents themselves are at the centre of a number of different communities, so this research is at the centre of a wider body of research that provides context and a sense of place to the individual findings for each area. ©MORI/18710 Simon Atkinson Emma Holloway Jaime Rose Neil Wholey 5 Community Research in Hambleton District Council Area 2003 for The Boundary Committee for England Local Communities Defining Communities Communities, in the context of this research, are a sense of place. The strength of this sense of place is related to the involvement residents have in their communities, whether with people in their own immediate neighbourhood, or with places further afield through, for example, shopping trips or work. For residents there are a number of different and overlapping communities: • Administrative Communities: the sense of place created by local council administrative boundaries. • Effective Communities: the sense of place created by visiting practical locations which cater
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Consultation Relating to the Structure of Local Government in North Yorkshire
    REPORT TO: Council DATE: 14 April 2021 SERVICE AREA: Chief Executive’s Office REPORTING OFFICER: Chief Executive (Wallace Sampson) SUBJECT: Consultation relating to the structure of local government in North Yorkshire WARD/S AFFECTED: ALL DISTRICT FORWARD PLAN REF: N/A 1.0 PURPOSE OF REPORT 1.1 The purpose of this report is to inform Council of the Secretary of State’s consultation on proposals for Local Government Review; to seek a response to the invitation to Harrogate Borough Council to comment on the North Yorkshire Proposal as consultee; and to consider making any further comment on the East/West proposal that Harrogate Borough Council resolved to submit to the Secretary of State which is now under consultation. 2.0 RECOMMENDATION/S 2.1 Members note that the Secretary of State is consulting on two proposals for re-organisation in the North Yorkshire area. 2.2 Members note that the consultation exercise is not a vote for one proposal over another. It is an opportunity to comment on the merits of both proposals and how they do (or do not) meet the Secretary of State’s guidance criteria. 2.3 Members note that ultimately this is a decision for the Secretary of State who has indicated that the approach to local government reorganisation should be locally led. 2.4 Members note that they can respond in their individual capacity as an elected member and in this regard members are referred to https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/proposals-for-locally-led- reorganisation-of-local-government-in-cumbria-north-yorkshire-and- 1 somerset/consultation-on-proposals-for-locally-led-reorganisation-of-local- government-in-cumbria-north-yorkshire-and-somerset 2.5 Members decide whether they wish the Council to: (a) Respond to the consultation questions in relation to the district council East/West proposal or whether they feel that the existing submission has already addressed the consultation questions; and/or (b) Respond to the consultation questions in relation to the North Yorkshire County Council proposal; and/or (c) Respond to neither.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of Rudby Parish Burial Board to Be Held on Monday, 14 October 2019 at 7.15 Pm in the Chapel Schoolroom
    MEETING OF RUDBY PARISH BURIAL BOARD TO BE HELD ON MONDAY, 14 OCTOBER 2019 AT 7.15 PM IN THE CHAPEL SCHOOLROOM Review of Fees. New Burial Ground AGENDA FOR THE MEETING OF RUDBY PARISH COUNCIL TO BE HELD FOLLOWING THE ABOVE MEETING 1. Apologies for absence 2. Minutes of last month’s meeting 3. Police Report and Neighbourhood Watch. Community Messages – Use of tasers in North Yorkshire – Public Survey; theft of quads; suspicious lorry around Industrial Estates, Northallerton. 4. Meeting open to the Public 5. Matters Arising a. Neighbourhood Plan b. Footpaths c. Village Hall and Play Area – Inspection Quote. Quote for tree work d. Sports Area – Inspection Quote. E mail SN Jenks re BMX track. Hedge e. Village Green f. 75th Anniversary of VE Day g. Communications h. VAS i. Fireworks Display. Quote for PA system, etc. Fireworks order. N-Sign – Quote j. Proposal for Tree Planting within the Parish k. Notice Board for Rudby - Quotes l. Christmas Tree m. Planning Training Session n. Stokesley & Villages Community Partnership Meeting held 2 October 6. Planning Applications a. Construction of a porch and new roof to bay window to front of property and a single storey extension including re-roofing of existing extension at rear of property at 22 Garbutts Lane. 19/01968/FUL b. Construction of detached dwelling, garage and new vehicle access at Plot 3, OS field 2719, Stokesley Road 19/02064/FUL c. Planning Appeal – Outline application with all matters reserved for the construction of up to 5 dwellings on land adjacent to Belbrough Lane. Appeal Ref: APP/G2713/W/19/3237629 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmondshire District Council Transforms Email Security and Data Privacy Footing to Refocus on Innovation
    Case Study Richmondshire District Council Transforms Email Security and Data Privacy Footing to Refocus on Innovation The North Yorkshire-based council transformed its email security and At a Glance data privacy footing while slashing Company: email management time to allow a • Supports 220 email users in 16 sites. focus on innovation in technology- • The council was seeking to secure its Exchange enabled service delivery • 2016 environment against advanced email threats including impersonation attacks. Richmondshire District Council is a local government body in North Yorkshire, • It needed a secure archive to take the pressure off local storage. England. It covers a large northern area of the Yorkshire Dales and must consistently • Content controls were required to prevent data leaks and aide GDPR compliance. deliver a wide range of public services – from revenues and benefits and homelessness Richmondshire District Council is a local government body in North Yorkshire, England. It provides the services to environmental health, planning, local population with a wide range of public services waste and recycling, and more. The – from revenues and benefits and homelessness services to environmental health, planning, waste and scale of the council’s operations, which recycling, and more. are headquartered in Richmond with 14 Products: smaller sites, means email is a primary Email Security, Archiving communicationtool both within the council and to interact with the public. www.mimecast.com | ©2020 Mimecast | All Rights Reserved | UK-1656 Richmondshire District Council Transforms Email Security and Data Privacy Footing to Refocus on Innovation For ICT & Business Change Manager, “We handle all the emails ourselves, from Graeme Thistlethwaite, that means keeping Exchange at the backend right across the email on is a major priority: “It is our main board for around 220 users,” he explained.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmondshire District Council
    What happens next? We have now completed our review of Richmondshire District Council. April 2018 Summary Report The recommendations must now be approved by Parliament. A draft order - the legal document which brings The full report and detailed maps: into force our recommendations - will be laid in Parliament. consultation.lgbce.org.uk www.lgbce.org.uk Subject to parliamentary scrutiny, the new electoral arrangements will come into force at the local elections in @LGBCE May 2019. Our recommendations: The table lists all the wards we are proposing as part of our final recommendations along with the number of Richmondshire voters in each ward. The table also shows the electoral variances for each of the proposed wards, which tells you how we have delivered electoral equality. Finally, the table includes electorate projections for 2023, so you can see the impact of the recommendations for the future. District Council Final recommendations on the new electoral arrangements Ward Number of Electorate Number of Variance Electorate Number of Variance Name: Councillors: (2017): Electors per form (2023): Electors per from Councillor: average % Councillor: Average % Catterick & 3 4,783 1,594 7% 5,008 1,669 4% Brompton-on- Swale Colburn 2 2,245 1,123 -25% 3,228 1,614 1% Croft & 2 2,872 1,436 -4% 2,949 1,475 -8% Middleton Tyas Gilling West 1 1,692 1,692 13% 1,713 1,713 7% Hawes, High 1 1,504 1,504 1% 1,522 1,522 -5% Abbotside & Upper Swaledale Hipswell 2 2,957 1,479 -1% 3,058 1,529 -4% Leyburn 2 2,934 1,467 -2% 3,266 1,633 2% Lower 1 1,455 1,455 -3% 1,462 1,462 -8% Who we are: Why Richmondshire? Swaledale & ■ The Local Government Boundary Commission for ■ Richmondshire District Council submitted a Arkengarthdale England is an independent body set up by Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Hambleton, Richmondshire and Whitby CCG Profile
    January 2019 North Yorkshire Joint Strategic Needs Assessment 2019 Hambleton, Richmondshire and Whitby CCG Profile Introduction This profile provides an overview of population health needs in Hambleton, Richmondshire and Whitby CCG (HRW CCG). Greater detail on particular topics can be found in our Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) resource at www.datanorthyorkshire.org which is broken down by district. This document is structured into five parts: population, deprivation, disease prevalence, hospital admissions and mortality. It identifies the major themes which affect health in HRW CCG and presents the latest available data, so the dates vary between indicators. Summary Life expectancy is higher than England. For 2011-2015, female life expectancy in HRW CCG is 84.2 years (England: 83.1), and male life expectancy is more than three years lower than for females at 80.9 years (England: 79.4) [1]. There is a high proportion of older people. In 2017, 25.1% of the population was aged 65 and over (36,100), higher than national average (17.3%). Furthermore over 4,300 (3.0%) were age 85+, compared with 2.3% in England. [2] Some children grow up in relative poverty. In 2015, there were 10.8% of children aged 0-15 years living in low income families, compared with 19.9% in England [1]. There are pockets of deprivation. Within the CCG area, 3 Lower Super Output Areas (LSOAs) out of a total of 95 are amongst the 20% most deprived in England. One of them is amongst the 10% most deprived in England, in the Whitby West Cliff ward [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Happy New Year! News: Staffing Update Carol-Ann Howe - Head of Inclusion Support Services;
    Communication and Interaction Team Newsletter Spring Term 2018 The Communication and Interaction Team are part of NYCC’s Inclusive Education Service, offering sup- port to educational settings for children and young people with Communication and Interaction diffi- culties. We are a team of Consultants, Specialist Teachers and Specialist Practitioners , comprising of a central team and professionals within Enhanced Mainstream Schools. We have a wide range of back- grounds, specialisms and experience including, Speech and Language therapy, Early Years, Autism and Psychology across the 0-25 age range. We provide a range of educational interventions and support for children and young people with speech, language, communi- cation and interaction needs. This includes children and young people with Autism, Developmental Language Disorder, Selec- tive Mutism, dysfluency and communication aid users. We also offer support and advice around a range of Social, Emotional and Mental Health needs and difficulties. Children and young people do not require any formal diagnosis to receive support from our team, we are a needs based service. Referrals should be made using a ‘Request for Involvement’ form see: http:// cyps.northyorks.gov.uk/special-educational-needs-disabilities . SEND mainstream guidance and details of the IES core and ex- tended offer can also be found on this webpage. Details on advice and specialist support for a child or young person with spe- cial educational needs or disabilities (SEND) can be found here: NYCC Local Offer: https://www.northyorks.gov.uk/send-
    [Show full text]
  • Right of Review
    North Yorkshire Choice Based Lettings Partnership Right of Review ‘To provide increased choice in housing to residents in North Yorkshire and help to create sustainable, mixed communities where people choose to live.’ Aug 2014 v1 Right of Review - Review Panel Process Right of Review Under the North Yorkshire Homechoice (NYHC) Common Allocation Policy applicants have a right of review in respect of a decision regarding their application. A review is when you feel the NYHC policy has been applied incorrectly resulting in an incorrect decision being made about your Home Choice application, including Access to the register, by either eligibility or qualification Banding Allocation of a property Cancelled application For clarification: A complaint, is when you feel that you have not received an acceptable service. eg your phone calls have not been returned. If you believe this has occurred and you want to take further action you should contact the partner landlord dealing with your application and follow their complaints procedure. See Appendix 1 for contact details of our partner landlords. This right of review does not apply to complaints. First review by Partner Landlord / Participating Landlord Any applicant who disagrees with a decision in relation to the NYHC policy should in the first instance, contact the partner landlord who made the decision and request a first review. The first review will be carried out by an officer of senior rank to the person that made the original decision and who will have had no previous involvement. Each partner will follow their internal procedures in respect of the first review.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Project on Fuel Poor Households
    To: Citizens Advice Mid-North Yorkshire From: YES Energy Solutions Date: 28/6/2018 Research: Fuel poor households with no central heating in North Yorkshire Foreword ‘A study to identify householders with no central heating facilities that are most likely to be living in fuel poverty in Craven, Hambleton, Harrogate, Richmondshire, Ryedale, Scarborough and Selby.’ Contents 1. Overview p3 2. Research objectives p3 3. Funding opportunities p3 4. Methodology p4 4.1 Process p4 4.2 Fuel Poor LSOAs p4 4.3 Considerations p4-5 4.4 EPC data p5 5. Statistics – all areas p6 5.1 Homes with no central heating p6 5.2 Urban & Rural Split p6 5.3 General observations (All Areas) p7 6. Craven p8 6.1 Urban – Craven p9 6.2 Rural – Craven p10 7. Hambleton p11 7.1 Urban – Hambleton p12 7.2 Rural – Hambleton p13 8. Harrogate p14 8.1 Urban – Harrogate p15 8.2 Rural – Harrogate p16 9. Richmondshire p17 9.1 Urban – Richmondshire p18 9.2 Rural – Richmondshire p19 10. Ryedale p20 10.1 Urban – Ryedale p21 10.2 Rural – Ryedale p22 11. Scarborough p23 11.1 Urban – Scarborough p24 11.2 Rural – Scarborough p25 12. Selby p26 12.1 Urban – Selby p27 12.2 Rural – Selby p28 13. Warm Homes Fund Bid p29 13.1 Urban - WHF Bid p30 - 31 13.2 Rural - WHF Bid p32 - 33 14. Data sets p34 Page 2 of 34 Overview YES Energy Solutions has been commissioned by Citizens Advice Mid-North Yorkshire to identify fuel poor households with no central heating facilities in seven Local Authority areas in North Yorkshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Workplace Representatives Army Foundation College Steward Mr Steven Knowles Broadacres Steward Mr Mark Norman Broadacres Health & Safety Rep
    Workplace Representatives Army Foundation College Steward Mr Steven Knowles Broadacres Steward Mr Mark Norman Broadacres Health & Safety Rep. Mr Mark Norman Caedmon College Steward Ms Rebecca Hobbs Citizens Advice Steward Mr Jose Roversi Graham School Steward Ms Nicola Laxton Hambleton District Council - Bedale Leisure Centre Health & Safety Rep. Mr Steven Abbott Hambleton District Council - Bedale Leisure Centre Steward Mr Steven Abbott Hambleton District Council - Civic Centre Steward Mrs Julie Biggins Hambleton District Council - Lesiure Centre Steward Mr Andrew Coulthard Hambleton District Council - Lesiure Centre Health & Safety Rep. Mr Andrew Coulthard Harrogate High School Health & Safety Rep. Mr Garry Frost Harrogate High School Steward Mrs Susan Darling Harrogate High School Steward Mr Garry Frost Humberside, Lincolnshire & North Yorkshire CRC Steward Mr Stephen Timmins Humberside, Lincolnshire & North Yorkshire CRC Health & Safety Rep. Mr Stephen Timmins Humberside, Lincolnshire & North Yorkshire CRC Steward Ms Pauline Wilkinson King James School Steward Mrs Susan Recchia Mowbray School Steward Mrs Rachel Brotherston North Yorkshire Moors National Park Health & Safety Rep. Mr Andrew Muir North Yorkshire Moors National Park Steward Mr Simon Bassindale Northallerton School & Sixth Form College Steward Mr Mark Shepherd Norton College Steward Mr Richard Kellett NYCC - Castle House Steward Mr David Griffiths NYCC - Colburn Medical Centre Steward Ms Ruth Appleby NYCC - Colburn Medical Centre Health & Safety Rep. Ms Ruth Appleby NYCC
    [Show full text]
  • Hambleton District Council Climate Change Comprehensive Risk Assessment 2011
    Hambleton District Council Climate Change Comprehensive Risk Assessment 2011 Contents Page 1. Executive Summary 3 2. Methodology 3 3. Key risks to Hambleton from a changing climate 4 4. LCLIP evidence for Hambleton District 4 5. UKCP09 predictions for Hambleton District Council 4 6. Summary of key risks to Hambleton District Council from a changing 5 Climate 7. Hambleton District Council Service Based Comprehensive Risk 8 Assessment 8. Hambleton District Council Climate Adaptation Action Plan 11 9. Conclusion 13 Appendix 1 – Detailed Methodology 14 Appendix 2 – Acknowledgements 15 Acronym: Hambleton District Council - HDC 2 1. Executive summary Services throughout Hambleton District Council will be affected in the future by episodes of weather extremes and Regional Improvement and Efficiency Partnership (RIEP) funded two local government officers to come into North Yorkshire Authorities to interview key council department representatives to understand what can be done at a service level to adapt each individual Authority against future disruption which will cost time and money. A weather extreme assessment examining the past five years was carried in 2010 by AECOM to understand past weather extreme events in Hambleton. This report indicates that the great majority of impacts in Hambleton are caused by excessive rainfall (65%) and snow and blizzards (26%). Extreme weather events in Hambleton district have impacts on service delivery and affect different services in both positive and negative ways. The challenge is to proactively work to find solutions to enable services to run continually throughout the year and overall to consider climate change adaptation in the decision making process. During the interview process several positive actions were generated by the individual services which indicates how Hambleton District Council can progress the weather extreme adaptation agenda in the near future to reduce the risk on business continuity and the time and cost constraints associated with a reduce or postponed service.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Ref: 0254.2018-19 Your Ref: Date: 25 June 2018 Civil Disclosure Joint Corporate Legal Services
    Our Ref: 0254.2018-19 Your Ref: Date: 25 June 2018 Civil Disclosure Joint Corporate Legal Services Claire Wilde <[email protected]> Dear Ms Wilde, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST REFERENCE NO: 0254.2018-19 I write in connection with your request for information which was received by North Yorkshire Police on 26 May 2018. I note you seek access to the following information: For each of the three years (2015, 2016, 2017) could I have: 1. The number of crimes reported, broken down by policing district and by crime type; 2. The number of crimes which resulted in charges, broken down by policing district and by crime type. Extent and Result of Searches to Locate Information To locate the information relevant to your request searches were conducted within North Yorkshire Police. I can confirm that the information you have requested is held by North Yorkshire Police. Decision I have today decided to disclose the located information to you. 1. Please find below the number of crimes reported, broken down by crime type and district. Crime District 2015 2016 2017 Total Arson & Criminal Damage Blank 3 8 6 17 Craven District Council 313 273 254 840 Hambleton District Council 469 494 494 1,457 Harrogate Borough Council 912 1,135 1,280 3,327 Richmondshire District Council 266 221 234 721 Ryedale District Council 244 268 227 739 Scarborough Borough council 1,259 1,257 1,192 3,708 Selby District Council 579 543 630 1,752 York City Council 1,590 1,576 1,580 4,746 Arson & Criminal Damage 5,635 5,775 5,897 17,307 Jane Wintermeyer
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping Opinion
    SCOPING OPINION: Proposed Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage Project Case Reference: EN010103 Adopted by the Planning Inspectorate (on behalf of the Secretary of State pursuant to Regulation 10 of The Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 April 2019 [This page has been intentionally left blank] ii Scoping Opinion for Teesside Cluster Carbon Capture & Usage Project CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 1 1.1 Background .................................................................................... 1 1.2 The Planning Inspectorate’s Consultation............................................. 2 1.3 Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union .......................................... 3 2. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ..................................................... 4 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................... 4 2.2 Description of the Proposed Development ............................................ 4 2.3 The Planning Inspectorate’s Comments ............................................... 5 3. ES APPROACH............................................................................... 9 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................... 9 3.2 Relevant National Policy Statements (NPSs)......................................... 9 3.3 Scope of Assessment ..................................................................... 10 3.4 Confidential
    [Show full text]