The Jews of Hellenistic Egypt, Rather Than Being Oppressed, Were Often

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Jews of Hellenistic Egypt, Rather Than Being Oppressed, Were Often RETURN FROM EXODUS: JEWS OF EGYPT DURING THE HELLENISTIC PERIOD A thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of The requirements for The degree Master of Arts In Special Major: Jewish Studies by Patricia Keer Munro San Francisco, CA May 2004 Copyright by Patricia Keer Munro 2004 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read Return from Exodus: Jews of Egypt during the Hellenistic Period by Patricia Keer Munro, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Special Major: Jewish Studies at San Francisco State University ________________________________________________ Fred Astren Professor of Jewish Studies ________________________________________________ Pamela Vaughn Professor of Classics ________________________________________________ Marc Dollinger Professor of Jewish Studies RETURN FROM EXODUS: JEWS OF EGYPT DURING THE HELLENISTIC PERIOD Patricia Keer Munro San Francisco State University 2004 During the Hellenistic period, the Jews of Egypt were a successful Jewish community in that they explicitly identified themselves as Jews; they were identified as Jews by the surrounding society; and they maintained or expanded their population for several centuries. Until the destruction of this community in 115-117 CE, these Jews functioned in both non-Jewish and Jewish spheres. This thesis will examine the ways in which the Jews of the Egyptian Jewish community to maintained a balance between integrating into and separating from the majority culture through analyzing three texts that may categorized as “popular literature.” I certify that the Abstract is a correct representation of the content of this thesis. _______________________________________ ________________ Fred Astren, Professor of Jewish Studies Date Chair, Thesis Committee ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis has taken shape over a long period of time. I could not have written it without the help and support of many people. Daniel Boyarin pointed me in the right direction at a critical time. Erich Gruen told me how to pare it down to the essentials. Stephanie Green and Ruth Haber provided moral support, intelligent reading, and good friendship. Marc Dollinger and Pamela Vaughn gave of their time to read it and give thoughtful commentary. I thank them all, but particularly Fred Astren, whose encouragement originally started me on the path, and who provided direction and support as I wrote. Finally, and most especially, I thank my family: Miranda and Deborah, who didn’t roll their eyes too much when Egyptian Jews were mentioned, and Dave, whose patience, humor, and love provide the foundation of our lives together. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter One: Let My People Go—to Egypt……………………………………….…..…1 Chapter Two: Jews in Hellenistic Egypt…………………………………………….…..28 Chapter Three: From Egyptian to Jew: Joseph and Asenath…………………………… ..………...……..51 Chapter Four: Shock and Awe in Judea and Egypt: III Maccabees………………………………..………..……….…70 Chapter Five: The Wisdom of the Jews comes to Alexandria: The Letter of Aristeas………………………………………..…..86 Chapter Six: Jews and Others in All Times and All Places……….……………...…….105 Bibliography……………………………………………………………..…..…………121 vi Chapter One: Let My People Go—to Egypt Introduction In the mythic narrative of Judaism, Egypt is a land of slavery and the Egyptians are the people who enslaved the Israelites until God brought them out of Egypt “with a strong hand and an outstretched arm,” and led them, circuitously, into the land of Israel. In this narrative, both Egypt and Israel are symbols: Egypt of slavery and Israel of freedom. Further, the goal, both of the narrative and within Jewish prayer, is to seek Israel—whether as reality or as symbol. A Jew makes “Aliyah” or “goes up to Israel.” This phrase elevates both the place and the person: if one goes up to Israel, everywhere else is down. To be out of Israel is to be in the Galut, in exile, and therefore is a condition, which—at least symbolically—must be overcome. And, while Jews may live in other countries besides Israel, Egypt represents the place to leave, as confirmed by the name of the Exodus itself: “Yitzi’at Mitzraim.” With this background, it might seem incongruous that through the Second Temple period and beyond, Jews came to live in Egypt and that there they developed a large, stable community that survived for several centuries. The perception of this community is further complicated in two ways. First, the Egypt in which Jews thrived was not the Egypt of the Pharaohs and Egyptian religion, nor the Roman Egypt of the desert monks and other early Christian thinkers, but the Egypt of Hellenistic rule, a world in which Jews had to understand themselves in relation to both Egyptian and Hellenistic worldviews. While the traditional narrative casts the Jews as slaves and the Egyptians as oppressors, the Jews of Hellenistic Egypt, rather than being oppressed, were often (though by no means always) part of the privileged class. Second, Egyptian Judaism was Return from Egypt: Introduction 1 © Patricia Munro 2004 a Judaism that successfully reconciled the dominant Hellenistic milieu with both religious and ethnic aspects of Judaism. That is, the Jews of Hellenistic Egypt neither abandoned Judaism, nor rejected the majority culture in which they lived. Rather, until riots of the first century of the Common Era and the subsequent destruction of the Egyptian Jewish community in 115-117 CE, these Jews functioned in both non-Jewish and Jewish spheres. During the intervening centuries, Christianity emerged as the dominant religion and culture, while rabbinic Judaism became the hegemonic type of Judaism, a model that has endured until modernity. However, the secular rationalism of the post-Enlightenment world, as well as the prevailing pluralist environment, have challenged its authority and its ability to “succeed” in the future. Longevity, while necessary, is obviously not sufficient to define success in all circumstances. Rather than using the hegemonic form of Judaism to define “successful” or “real” Judaism, another definition could use the following three criteria. First, it remains “Jewish” in form—that is, it neither defines itself nor is defined by other Jews as another religion (as happened with Christianity). Second, it is perceived as Jewish by surrounding dominant cultures. Finally, it persists despite assimilation or acculturation, a point that can be further characterized as a Jewish population that maintains or increases its numbers over a substantial length of time, which I would define as two hundred years. These three criteria share the virtue of simplicity: rather than defining Judaism according to particular practice or belief, which has the effect of privileging one particular Judaism over another, this definition assumes that only Jews would claim to be Jewish (although different groups of Jews will argue as to who is truly a Jew) or would be so identified by the society around them.1 The criterion of longevity is admittedly Return from Egypt: Introduction 2 © Patricia Munro 2004 somewhat arbitrary. Clearly, a few generations—under one hundred years—is too short to establish longevity. However, as a criterion for success, a millennium is too long, excluding, for example, the Roman empire. Within Jewish tradition, the span of ten generations, or approximately two hundred years, has been used to indicate the passage of time and, indeed, seems a reasonable minimum for cultural continuity. These criteria—self-identification, identification by the dominant culture, and persistence—can be applied to the Egyptian Jewish community under Hellenism. The Hellenistic (and early Roman) period, which lasted from Alexander’s conquest in 333 BCE and ended following the riots in 117 CE, provided a relatively favorable environment for a stable Jewish community. During this time, the Egyptian Jewish community met the criteria for success defined above: they explicitly identified themselves as Jews, interpreting Judaism to themselves and the surrounding world; they were identified as Jews by the surrounding society; and they persisted, with the Jewish population not only maintaining, but expanding during that time. The specific problems these Jews faced appear in the surviving papyri, as well as in historical and philosophical literature, all of which provide evidence of a diverse people confronting issues common to any minority culture. These writings show that Jews came to Egypt for many reasons: some as slaves, some as part of the Ptolemaic army, and still others for the trade opportunities in Alexandria. These Jews were fluent in Greek (but not necessarily Hebrew), exhibited an ongoing struggle to reconcile Jewish beliefs with Hellenistic ideology, and even, in some cases, intermarried or converted (both to and from Judaism). Egyptian Jews, as with other Jews of this period, had few Return from Egypt: Introduction 3 © Patricia Munro 2004 identifying features and therefore could have assimilated into the Hellenistic world. That they, as a group, did not indicates some degree of choice. While the Jews of Egypt are intrinsically interesting, it was the parallels between this community and the American Jewish community that particularly caught my attention. Both Hellenization and modernity functioned in pluralistic worlds with competing ideologies. Both, either explicitly or in effect, distinguished between the public and the private domains of
Recommended publications
  • 1 ETHNICITY and JEWISH IDENTITY in JOSEPHUS by DAVID
    ETHNICITY AND JEWISH IDENTITY IN JOSEPHUS By DAVID McCLISTER A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008 1 © 2008 David McClister 2 To the memory of my father, Dorval L. McClister, who instilled in me a love of learning; to the memory of Dr. Phil Roberts, my esteemed colleague; and to my wife, Lisa, without whose support this dissertation, or much else that I do, would not have been possible. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gladly recognize my supervisory committee chair (Dr. Konstantinos Kapparis, Associate Professor in the Classics Department at the University of Florida). I also wish to thank the other supervisory commiteee members (Dr. Jennifer Rea, Dr. Gareth Schmeling, and Dr. Gwynn Kessler as a reader from the Religious Studies Department). It is an honor to have their contributions and to work under their guidance. I also wish to thank the library staff at the University of Florida and at Florida College (especially Ashley Barlar) who did their work so well and retrieved the research materials necessary for this project. I also wish to thank my family for their patient indulgence as I have robbed them of time to give attention to the work necessary to pursue my academic interests. BWGRKL [Greek] Postscript® Type 1 and TrueTypeT font Copyright © 1994-2006 BibleWorks, LLC. All rights reserved. These Biblical Greek and Hebrew fonts are used with permission and are from BibleWorks, software for Biblical
    [Show full text]
  • Notes to the Fragments
    NOTES TO THE FRAGMENTS Fragm.l I Anti-Semitic versions of the Exodus-story were current in the Hellenistic-Roman period. We have fragments of some ten authors who wrote on this subject between the fourth century B.CE. and the fourth century CE. See J. G. Gager, Moses in Greco-Roman Paganism, Nashville-New York (Abingdon Press) 1972, 113-133, and N. R. M. de Lange- C Thoma, Antisemitismus I, Theologische Realen=yklopiidie III (1978), 116-117. Gager • rightly remarks (on Manetho, but it applies as well to Chaeremon, Lysimachus, Apion, etc.): "there is general agreement that the underlying stories themselves, of which there were many versions (the invasion of Egypt by outsiders, variously called Hyksos and Syrians; the reign of terror under these outsiders who devastated the holy places of the indigenous Egyptian religion; the expulsion of the outsiders by a hero-king), reach far back into Egyptian history and that their application to the Jews is only a secondary phenomenon" (116). Traditions about the Hyksos and the Sethians have especially played a part in this development. See on these and related matters J. Marquart, Chronologische Untersuchungen 3: Die Exodusberichte des Manetho und Chairemon und die Josephs­ geschichte der Genesis, Philologus Supplementband VII (1899), 667-693; R. Weill. La fin du moyen empire egyptien I, Paris (Picard) 1918, 104-111; P. Montet, Le drame d'Avaris. Essai sur la penetration des Semites en Egypte, Paris (Geuther), 1941, 173-186; J. Schwartz, Le 'cycle de Petoubastis' et les commentaires egyptiens de l'Exode, BIFAO 49 (1950), 67-83, esp.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Panayotov Phd Thesis
    THE JEWS IN THE BALKAN PROVINCES OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE : AN EPIGRAPHIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY Alexander Panayotov A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2004 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/13849 This item is protected by original copyright THE JEWS IN THE BALKAN PROVINCES OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE. AN EPIGRAPHIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY Alexander Panayotov PhD Candidate Submitted: 28lh January 2004 School of Divinity University of St Andrews Scotland ProQuest Number: 10170770 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10170770 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 I, ALEXANDER ANTONIEV PANAYOTOV, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 94,520 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Nickelsburg Final.Indd
    1 Sects, Parties, and Tendencies Judaism of the last two centuries b.c.e. and the first century c.e. saw the devel- opment of a rich, variegated array of groups, sects, and parties. In this chapter we shall present certain of these groupings, both as they saw themselves and as others saw them. Samaritans, Hasideans, Pharisees and Sadducees, Essenes, and Therapeutae will come to our attention, as will a brief consideration of the hellenization of Judaism and appearance of an apocalyptic form of Judaism. The diversity—which is not in name only, but also in belief and practice, order of life and customary conduct, and the cultural and intellectual forms in which it was expressed—raises several questions: How did this diversity originate? What were the predominating characteristics of Judaism of that age or, indeed, were there such? Was there a Judaism or were there many Judaisms? How do rabbinic Juda- ism and early Christianity emerge from it or them? The question of origins takes us back into the unknown. The religious and social history of Judaism in the latter part of the Persian era and in the Ptolemaic age (the fourth and third centuries b.c.e.) is little documented. The Persian prov- ince of Judah was a temple state ruled by a high-priestly aristocracy. Although some of the later parts of the Bible were written then and others edited at that time, and despite some new information from the Dead Sea manuscripts, the age itself remains largely unknown. Some scholars have tried to reconstruct the history of this period by work- ing back from the conflict between Hellenism and Judaism that broke into open revolt in the early second century.1 With the conquests of Alexander the Great in 334–323 b.c.e.—and indeed, somewhat earlier—the vital and powerful culture of the Greeks and the age-old cultures of the Near East entered upon a process of contact and conflict and generated varied forms of religious synthesis and self- definition.
    [Show full text]
  • King Herod: a Persecuted Persecutor
    KING HEROD: A PERSECUTED PERSECUTOR A CASE STUDY IN PSYCHOHISTORY AND PSYCHOBIOGRAPHY BY ARYEH KASHER IN COLLABORATION WITH ELIEZER WITZTUM TRANSLATED BY KAREN GOLD WALTER DE GRUYTER • BERLIN • NEW YORK Table of Contents Foreword xi Preface xvii Acknowledgements xix Introduction Methodology 1 Psychopathological Aspects of Herod 12 Chapter 1 Residues of Childhood in the Late Hasmonaean Period (73/72-63 BCE) Herod's Origins and Their Impact on His Personality 18 Political Ambitions since Childhood 24 Chapter 2 Adolescence in the Shadow of the Roman Conquest (63-42 BCE) Consolidation of Power in the House of Antipater 34 Appointment as Strategos of Galilee, and Trial before San- hedrin (47-46 BCE) 39 Political Acrobatics Following the Murder of Julius Caesar 45 Betrothal to Mariamme the Hasmonaean (42 BCE) 51 Chapter 3 From the Utmost Depths to the Conquest of Jerusalem (41-37 BCE) In the Shadow of the Parthian Invasion 57 The Rift between Herod and the Nabateans 64 Herod is Crowned in Rome as King of Judaea 65 The War against Mattathias Antigonus 72 vi Table of Contents Chapter 4 Herod in the First Year of His Reign (37 BCE) Conquest of Jerusalem 84 Execution of Mattathias Antigonus 86 Marriage to Mariamme the Hasmonaean 92 New Arrangements in Conquered Jerusalem 99 Chapter 5 Roots and Ramifications of the Hasmonaean Trauma (37-34 BCE) The Problem of John Hyrcanus II 101 The Murder of Aristobulus III 104 Alexandra and Cleopatra's Influence on Antony Regarding the Laodicea Meeting 113 Construction of Masada as a Palace-Fortress 116 The First
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Moses/Musaeus/Mochos and His
    University of Groningen Moses/Musaeus/Mochos and his God Yahweh, Iao, and Sabaoth, seen from a Graeco- Roman perspective van Kooten, G.H. Published in: The revelation of the name YHWH to Moses IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2006 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): van Kooten, G. H. (2006). Moses/Musaeus/Mochos and his God Yahweh, Iao, and Sabaoth, seen from a Graeco-Roman perspective. In G. H. V. Kooten (Ed.), The revelation of the name YHWH to Moses: Perspectives from Judaism, the pagan Graeco-Roman world, and early christianity (pp. 107-138). (Themes in Biblical Narrative; No. 9). Brill. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae – Daniel R
    January 2017 Curriculum Vitae – Daniel R. Schwartz I. Personal. Born Syracuse, New York 1952. Emigrated to Israel 1971. Citizen of USA and Israel. II. Contact. Office Address: Mandel Scholion, 1202 Rabin Bldg., Hebrew University, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem, Israel 91905. Tel. +972-2-588-2773. Fax: +972-2-588-1196. Home: Mevo HaOleh 10, Jerusalem 93586. Tel. +972-2-5637564. E-mail: [email protected]. III. Education 1971-1980 Hebrew University, Jerusalem (B.A. cum laude in History and Jewish History, M.A. cum laude and PhD. in Jewish History) 1970/71 Maryland University (History Honors Program) 1968-1971 Baltimore Hebrew College (1-2 courses per semester) Earlier education in Syracuse, N.Y. and Silver Spring, Md., USA IV. Academic Positions 1979- present: Dept. of Jewish History and Contemporary Jewry, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Since 1995: full professor. Since 2014: Herbst Family Professor of Judaic Studies. [Sabbatical teaching: Winter 2010: University of Toronto. Spring 2003: Yale University. Winter 1990/91: Universität Basel and Institut für jüdisch-christliche Forschung, Lucerne. 1989/90: New York University and Jewish Theological Seminary, NY. 1985/86: New York University and Queens College, New York. Sabbatical research: Spring 2008: Netherlands Institute of Advanced Studies. Spring 2003 and spring 2004: Abteilung für Neutestamentliche Theologie, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität, Munich. 1995/5 and 2000/1: Institute of Advanced Studies, Hebrew University.] [Special positions at Hebrew University: 2015- dean’s assistant for promotions; 2011- academic head, Mandel Scholion Interdisciplinary Research Ctr. 2005-2011, chair, HU Committee on Academic Rules and Procedures. 2006-2009 fellow, Mandel Scholion. 2003-2006 vice chargé of student discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Judaism: a Supplemental Resource for Grade 12 World of Religions: A
    Change and Evolution Stages in the Development of Judaism: A Historical Perspective As the timeline chart presented earlier demonstrates, the development of the Jewish faith and tradition which occurred over thousands of years was affected by a number of developments and events that took place over that period. As with other faiths, the scriptures or oral historical records of the development of the religion may not be supported by the contemporary archaeological, historical, or scientific theories and available data or artifacts. The historical development of the Jewish religion and beliefs is subject to debate between archeologists, historians, and biblical scholars. Scholars have developed ideas and theories about the development of Jewish history and religion. The reason for this diversity of opinion and perspectives is rooted in the lack of historical materials, and the illusive nature, ambiguity, and ambivalence of the relevant data. Generally, there is limited information about Jewish history before the time of King David (1010–970 BCE) and almost no reliable biblical evidence regarding what religious beliefs and behaviour were before those reflected in the Torah. As the Torah was only finalized in the early Persian period (late 6th–5th centuries BCE), the evidence of the Torah is most relevant to early Second Temple Judaism. As well, the Judaism reflected in the Torah would seem to be generally similar to that later practiced by the Sadducees and Samaritans. By drawing on archeological information and the analysis of Jewish Scriptures, scholars have developed theories about the origins and development of Judaism. Over time, there have been many different views regarding the key periods of the development of Judaism.
    [Show full text]
  • Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics Volume 2 G–O
    ENCYCLOPEDIA OF ANCIENT GREEK LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS Volume 2 G–O General Editor Georgios K. Giannakis Associate Editors Vit Bubenik Emilio Crespo Chris Golston Alexandra Lianeri Silvia Luraghi Stephanos Matthaios LEIDEn • BOSTON 2014 This is a digital offprint for restricted use only | © 2014 Koninklijke Brill NV Table of Contents Volume One Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... vii List of Contributors ....................................................................................................................................... xi Table of Contents Ordered by Thematic Category ............................................................................... xv Transcription, Abbreviations, Bibliography ........................................................................................... xxi List of Illustrations ......................................................................................................................................... xxiii Articles A–F ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Volume Two Transcription, Abbreviations, Bibliography ........................................................................................... vii Articles G–O ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Toward a New Synthesis of the God of Edom and Yahweh
    Kelley, Justin Toward a new synthesis of the god of Edom and Yahweh Antiguo Oriente: Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente Vol. 7, 2009 Este documento está disponible en la Biblioteca Digital de la Universidad Católica Argentina, repositorio institucional desarrollado por la Biblioteca Central “San Benito Abad”. Su objetivo es difundir y preservar la producción intelectual de la institución. La Biblioteca posee la autorización del autor para su divulgación en línea. Cómo citar el documento: Kelley, Justin. “Toward a new synthesis of the god of Edom and Yaheweh”. Antiguo Oriente: Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Historia del Antiguo Oriente 7 (2009). http://bibliotecadigital.uca.edu.ar/repositorio/revistas/toward- new-synthesis-god-edom.pdf (Se recomienda indicar al finalizar la cita bibliográfica la fecha de consulta entre corchetes. Ej: [consulta: 19 de agosto, 2010]). TOWARD A NEW SYntHESIS * OF THE GOD OF EDOM AND YAHWEH JUSTIN KELLEY [email protected] Life Pacific College USA Summary: Toward a New Synthesis of the God of Edom and Yahweh This article deals primarily with two things: 1) the history and nature of the Edomite deity Qos, as far as these can be determined from the known archaeological and textual evidence, and 2) the similarities between Qos and Yahweh, the god of Israel, particularly in regard to the theories concerning the origins of the deities. Through the article I will consider some of the recent suggestions concerning the origin of Qos and how this may relate to the origin of Yahweh. I will suggest that both deities originated in the northwestern portion of the Arabian Peninsula and, that ultimately, the mutual origin of the deities accounts for the fact that the Bible makes no reference to Qos as the god of Edom.
    [Show full text]
  • Temple Ideology in the Writings of Jewish Alexandria
    TEMPLE IDEOLOGY IN THE WRITINGS OF JEWISH ALEXANDRIA by PHILIP HAROLD EDWARD SCRIBER III (Under the Direction of David S. Williams) ABSTRACT This paper attempts to demonstrate the ways in which Philo and the writers of 3 Maccabees, the Letter of Aristeas and the Wisdom of Solomon used the tools of Greek philosophy and Jewish culture. After a summary of the social and literary relationship of the Alexandrian community to Jerusalem and the Temple there, a close reading of the four authors' works reveals the ways which the idea of Temple ties the Jews to their brethren in Palestine and to the Greek world which surrounded them. INDEX WORDS: Alexandria, Judaism, Temple, Jerusalem, 3 Maccabees, Philo, Aristeas, Wisdom of Solomon, Platonism, Stoicism TEMPLE IDEOLOGY IN THE WRITINGS OF JEWISH ALEXANDRIA by PHILIP HAROLD EDWARD SCRIBER III B.A., Berry College, 2003 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2009 © 2009 Philip Scriber III All Rights Reserved TEMPLE IDEOLOGY IN THE WRITINGS OF JEWISH ALEXANDRIA by PHILIP HAROLD EDWARD SCRIBER III Major Professor: David Williams Committee: Carolyn Jones-Medine Sandy Martin Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia December 2009 iv DEDICATION To J. May this be worthy of your faith in me. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Torah in the Diaspora: a Comparative Study of Philo and 4 Maccabees
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 4-22-2013 12:00 AM Torah in the Diaspora: A Comparative Study of Philo and 4 Maccabees Christopher J. Cornthwaite The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Daniel A. Smith The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Theology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Arts © Christopher J. Cornthwaite 2013 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the History of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Cornthwaite, Christopher J., "Torah in the Diaspora: A Comparative Study of Philo and 4 Maccabees" (2013). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 1207. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1207 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TORAH IN THE DIASPORA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PHILO AND 4 MACCABEES (Thesis format: Monograph) by Christopher J. Cornthwaite Graduate Program in Theology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Christopher J. Cornthwaite 2013 Abstract This thesis examines how Judaism was Hellenized by comparing how difference, boundaries, and syncretism function in both Philo and 4 Maccabees. Recent historical and anthropological methods demand rejection of old approaches to these works which differentiated between the Judaism and the Hellenism in them and were often dominated by attempts to show where these authors’ intellectual fidelities lay.
    [Show full text]