DOCSLIB.ORG

Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics Volume 2 G–O

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics Volume 2 G–O ENCYCLOPEDIA OF ANCIENT GREEK LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS Volume 2 G–O General Editor Georgios K. Giannakis Associate Editors Vit Bubenik Emilio Crespo Chris Golston Alexandra Lianeri Silvia Luraghi Stephanos Matthaios LEIDEn • BOSTON 2014 This is a digital offprint for restricted use only | © 2014 Koninklijke Brill NV Table of Contents Volume One Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... vii List of Contributors ....................................................................................................................................... xi Table of Contents Ordered by Thematic Category ............................................................................... xv Transcription, Abbreviations, Bibliography ........................................................................................... xxi List of Illustrations ......................................................................................................................................... xxiii Articles A–F ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Volume Two Transcription, Abbreviations, Bibliography ........................................................................................... vii Articles G–O .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Volume Three Transcription, Abbreviations, Bibliography ........................................................................................... vii Articles P–Z ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 Index .................................................................................................................................................................. 547 ISBN: 978-90-04-22597-8 This is a digital offprint for restricted use only | © 2014 Koninklijke Brill NV J Jewish Greek in particular who spoke of a ‘Jewish Greek dia- lect’ lexically and syntactically permeated with 1. Introduction Hebrew and Aramaic elements. This was not merely a language used for the translation of the Scholars have applied the term ‘Jewish Greek’, Bible. It was actually spoken by the Jewish com- not always consistently, to different forms of munity of Alexandria, or within religious circles. linguistic expression that arose through the con- This would explain all its barbarisms, idioms tact of the Greek language with the Jewish world. and, in general, divergences from the coeval Here I will only deal with the Greek used by the → Koine Greek. Later on the so-called ‘Jewish Jews in the Hellenist-Roman period, leaving out Greek theory’ was further developed, especially what is more properly defined as ‘Judaeo-Greek’, as regards the time and texts of the New Testa- the Greek spoken by Romaniote Jews and writ- ment (Turner 1955; 1965), which, albeit with new ten in the Hebrew alphabet, first attested in distinctions and definitions, still has its uphold- late antique times. Ever since the middle of the ers even today. Several scholars, however, have 20th century, a certain trend of scholarship used questioned the existence of a specific Jewish the expression ‘Jewish Greek’ to designate the Greek dialect. Even before Thackeray’s influ- Greek of the Septuagint. This term was originally ential critical reflections on the existence of a applied only to the essentially homogeneous lan- ‘Jewish Greek jargon’ (1909:25–28), Deissmann, guage used for the translation of the Pentateuch although admitting that Septuagint Greek had into Greek in the 3rd century BCE. Later on Semitic overtones, demonstrated the neutral some scholars also applied it to the translation character of New Testament Greek, where at the of the whole corpus of the Septuagint – includ- most one could find some Semitisms, but not a ing Prophets and Hagiographers – although this series of vulgarisms (Deissmann 1901; → Semitic was carried out much later and followed differ- Loanwords in Greek). ent linguistic and translation approaches. Others use ‘Jewish Greek’ to designate the language of 3. Septuagint Greek Judaeo-Hellenist writers in general, or for the vernacular of most of the Jews of the western As to the language of the Septuagint, many Diaspora until the Byzantine age. scholars regard it rather as a Koine Greek whose partial Semitization was due to the translation 2. The Rise of ‘Jewish Greek Theory’ method applied rather than to linguistic reasons. A comparison with coeval Judaeo-Egyptian Greek The roots of ‘Jewish Greek theory’ go way back → papyri of the Ptolemaic age seems to confirm to the very beginning of studies – as early as this (Moulton 1919; Silva 1980; Lee 1983:11–30). the 18th century – on the languages of the Bib- Septuagint Greek is rich in → calques, semantic lical text, and especially on the character of shifts, loanwords, and syntactic calques, espe- → New Testament Greek. It is Gehman (1951) cially in its preference for paratactic rather than This is a digital offprint for restricted use only | © 2014 Koninklijke Brill NV jewish greek 269 hypotactic constructions (especially in Psalms). far from unique mastery of epic, philosophy, and The approach of the translators was further rhetoric. Flavius Josephus is sometimes included influenced not only by the Semitic Vorlage but among these writers, but his case is different, also by the natural local development of the because he had his works revised before publica- Greek language, which in Egypt was also influ- tion to improve their style (Contra Apionem 1.9). enced by Coptic, in Palestine only by Aramaic The language of Josephus’ works is usually of not and Hebrew. ‘Biblical Greek’, according to some especially good quality and diverse, a reflection scholars, or ‘Synagogue Greek’, according to of the different hands of his various collabora- others, best describes this language, which was tors. It has been investigated much less than his certainly used in translation and liturgy, but subject matter, the most in-depth analysis still was not necessarily spoken. Horsley (1989) pro- being Schmidt (1893). In Josephus as well as in all vides an exhaustive overview of the situation, the other Judeo-Hellenist writers there is not the claiming that the notion of ‘Jewish Greek’ stems slightest hint of a special variety of Greek. This is from pre-modern linguistic theories. Some more also true of texts on papyri. recently recognized variables, Horsley argues, that depend on phenomena such as linguistic 5. Diastratic Variations interference, → diglossia, and register shifts are enough to explain the peculiarities of the Greek There is no doubt, on the other hand, that the used in Jewish literary sources of the Hellenistic- sources we have referred to so far adopt – or Roman period, whose only specifically Hebrew strive to adopt – a higher variety of language, traits can be found in some phonological aspects. with some variations in register that can be Some consider these conclusions too radical. To perceived in papyri, and sometimes also in strike a balance among the many valid argu- the Biblical texts. For example, in the book of ments put forward from both camps, today some the Siracides there is a marked difference scholars prefer not to take an aprioristic stand, between Yešua‘ ben Sirā’s sophisticated prologue, especially since new texts, mainly on papyri, are written directly in Greek, and his translation of constantly coming to light in Egypt and the Syro- the text itself, which is in an evidently lower Palestinian region. register, in spite of being by the same hand. The fact is that we do not have sufficient documen- 4. Judaeo-Hellenist Writers tation to understand diastratic variations in the Greek used by the Jews in the Hellenistic-Roman Along with the language of the Septuagint – period. It is probably naïve to strive to trace whose stylistic curve has its highest point in the the variety and characteristics of their language Pentateuch and the lowest in the Tobit – and the in the linguistically filtered writings of rhetors, New Testament, we also need to take into consid- poets, historians and philosophers. In other eration the language of Judaeo-Hellenist writers. words, we lack sufficient evidence to analyze the The most important of these writers, if not the sociolinguistic aspects of the question. The most majority of them, had a mastery of Greek equal solid evidence we have is quantitative: we know, or even superior to that of many of their Gentile not so much from literary texts as from papyri contemporaries. This is true, for example, of and, even more, from inscriptions, that Greek Caecilius of Calacte, a grammarian and rhetor of was the language of the Jews. Indeed, in some the Augustan age who was possibly the foremost milieus the use of Greek can even be regarded as expert on Demosthenean orations of his time; a distinctive Jewish trait. of Justus of Tiberias and Nicholas of Damascus; of a number of authors, mostly anonymous, of 6. Epigraphic Evidence literary-philosophical syntheses of Biblical tradi- tion and the most diverse expressions of Greek It is worth taking seriously the evidence for culture, many fragments of which have come the diffusion of Greek in Jewish inscriptions of down to us (see Denis 1970); of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 ETHNICITY and JEWISH IDENTITY in JOSEPHUS by DAVID
    ETHNICITY AND JEWISH IDENTITY IN JOSEPHUS By DAVID McCLISTER A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008 1 © 2008 David McClister 2 To the memory of my father, Dorval L. McClister, who instilled in me a love of learning; to the memory of Dr. Phil Roberts, my esteemed colleague; and to my wife, Lisa, without whose support this dissertation, or much else that I do, would not have been possible. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gladly recognize my supervisory committee chair (Dr. Konstantinos Kapparis, Associate Professor in the Classics Department at the University of Florida). I also wish to thank the other supervisory commiteee members (Dr. Jennifer Rea, Dr. Gareth Schmeling, and Dr. Gwynn Kessler as a reader from the Religious Studies Department). It is an honor to have their contributions and to work under their guidance. I also wish to thank the library staff at the University of Florida and at Florida College (especially Ashley Barlar) who did their work so well and retrieved the research materials necessary for this project. I also wish to thank my family for their patient indulgence as I have robbed them of time to give attention to the work necessary to pursue my academic interests. BWGRKL [Greek] Postscript® Type 1 and TrueTypeT font Copyright © 1994-2006 BibleWorks, LLC. All rights reserved. These Biblical Greek and Hebrew fonts are used with permission and are from BibleWorks, software for Biblical
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Panayotov Phd Thesis
    THE JEWS IN THE BALKAN PROVINCES OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE : AN EPIGRAPHIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY Alexander Panayotov A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2004 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/13849 This item is protected by original copyright THE JEWS IN THE BALKAN PROVINCES OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE. AN EPIGRAPHIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY Alexander Panayotov PhD Candidate Submitted: 28lh January 2004 School of Divinity University of St Andrews Scotland ProQuest Number: 10170770 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10170770 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 I, ALEXANDER ANTONIEV PANAYOTOV, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 94,520 words in length, has been written by me, that it is the record of work carried out by me and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Nickelsburg Final.Indd
    1 Sects, Parties, and Tendencies Judaism of the last two centuries b.c.e. and the first century c.e. saw the devel- opment of a rich, variegated array of groups, sects, and parties. In this chapter we shall present certain of these groupings, both as they saw themselves and as others saw them. Samaritans, Hasideans, Pharisees and Sadducees, Essenes, and Therapeutae will come to our attention, as will a brief consideration of the hellenization of Judaism and appearance of an apocalyptic form of Judaism. The diversity—which is not in name only, but also in belief and practice, order of life and customary conduct, and the cultural and intellectual forms in which it was expressed—raises several questions: How did this diversity originate? What were the predominating characteristics of Judaism of that age or, indeed, were there such? Was there a Judaism or were there many Judaisms? How do rabbinic Juda- ism and early Christianity emerge from it or them? The question of origins takes us back into the unknown. The religious and social history of Judaism in the latter part of the Persian era and in the Ptolemaic age (the fourth and third centuries b.c.e.) is little documented. The Persian prov- ince of Judah was a temple state ruled by a high-priestly aristocracy. Although some of the later parts of the Bible were written then and others edited at that time, and despite some new information from the Dead Sea manuscripts, the age itself remains largely unknown. Some scholars have tried to reconstruct the history of this period by work- ing back from the conflict between Hellenism and Judaism that broke into open revolt in the early second century.1 With the conquests of Alexander the Great in 334–323 b.c.e.—and indeed, somewhat earlier—the vital and powerful culture of the Greeks and the age-old cultures of the Near East entered upon a process of contact and conflict and generated varied forms of religious synthesis and self- definition.
    [Show full text]
  • Judaism: a Supplemental Resource for Grade 12 World of Religions: A
    Change and Evolution Stages in the Development of Judaism: A Historical Perspective As the timeline chart presented earlier demonstrates, the development of the Jewish faith and tradition which occurred over thousands of years was affected by a number of developments and events that took place over that period. As with other faiths, the scriptures or oral historical records of the development of the religion may not be supported by the contemporary archaeological, historical, or scientific theories and available data or artifacts. The historical development of the Jewish religion and beliefs is subject to debate between archeologists, historians, and biblical scholars. Scholars have developed ideas and theories about the development of Jewish history and religion. The reason for this diversity of opinion and perspectives is rooted in the lack of historical materials, and the illusive nature, ambiguity, and ambivalence of the relevant data. Generally, there is limited information about Jewish history before the time of King David (1010–970 BCE) and almost no reliable biblical evidence regarding what religious beliefs and behaviour were before those reflected in the Torah. As the Torah was only finalized in the early Persian period (late 6th–5th centuries BCE), the evidence of the Torah is most relevant to early Second Temple Judaism. As well, the Judaism reflected in the Torah would seem to be generally similar to that later practiced by the Sadducees and Samaritans. By drawing on archeological information and the analysis of Jewish Scriptures, scholars have developed theories about the origins and development of Judaism. Over time, there have been many different views regarding the key periods of the development of Judaism.
    [Show full text]
  • Torah in the Diaspora: a Comparative Study of Philo and 4 Maccabees
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 4-22-2013 12:00 AM Torah in the Diaspora: A Comparative Study of Philo and 4 Maccabees Christopher J. Cornthwaite The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Dr. Daniel A. Smith The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Theology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Arts © Christopher J. Cornthwaite 2013 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the History of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Cornthwaite, Christopher J., "Torah in the Diaspora: A Comparative Study of Philo and 4 Maccabees" (2013). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 1207. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/1207 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TORAH IN THE DIASPORA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PHILO AND 4 MACCABEES (Thesis format: Monograph) by Christopher J. Cornthwaite Graduate Program in Theology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Christopher J. Cornthwaite 2013 Abstract This thesis examines how Judaism was Hellenized by comparing how difference, boundaries, and syncretism function in both Philo and 4 Maccabees. Recent historical and anthropological methods demand rejection of old approaches to these works which differentiated between the Judaism and the Hellenism in them and were often dominated by attempts to show where these authors’ intellectual fidelities lay.
    [Show full text]
  • Judaism: a Supplemental Resource for Grade 12 World of Religions: A
    JUDAISM A Supplemental Resource for GRADE 12 World of Religions A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE JUDAISM A Supplemental Resource for GRADE 12 World of Religions A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE 2019 Manitoba Education Manitoba Education Cataloguing in Publication Data Judaism : Grade 12 world of religions : a Canadian perspective Includes bibliographical references. This resource is available in print and electronic formats. ISBN: 978-0-7711-7933-4 (pdf) ISBN: 978-0-7711-7935-8 (print) 1. Judaism—Study and teaching (Secondary)—Manitoba. 2. Religion—Study and teaching (Secondary)—Manitoba. 3. Multiculturalism—Study and teaching (Secondary) --Manitoba. 4. Spirituality – Study and teaching (Secondary) – Manitoba. 5. Religion and culture – Study and teaching (Secondary) -- Manitoba. I. Manitoba. Manitoba Education. 379.28 Copyright © 2019, the Government of Manitoba, represented by the Minister of Education. Manitoba Education Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Every effort has been made to acknowledge original sources and to comply with copyright law. If cases are identified where this has not been done, please notify Manitoba Education. Errors or omissions will be corrected in a future edition. Sincere thanks to the authors, artists, and publishers who allowed their original material to be used. All images found in this resource are copyright protected and should not be extracted, accessed, or reproduced for any purpose other than for their intended educational use in this resource. Any websites referenced in this resource are subject to change without notice. Educators are advised to preview and evaluate websites and online resources before recommending them for student use. Print copies of this resource (stock number 80750) can be purchased from the Manitoba Learning Resource Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • CREATING JUDAISM History, Tradition, Practice
    CREATING JUDAISM History, Tradition, Practice Michael L. Satlow Columbia University Press New York Creating Judaism Michael l. Satlow Creating Judaism 3 History, Tradition, Practice 4 Columbia University Press New York Columbia University Press Publishers Since 1893 New York, Chichester, West Sussex Copyright © 2006 Michael L. Satlow All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Satlow, Michael L. Creating Judaism : history, tradition, practice / Michael L. Satlow p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBn 0-231-13488-6 (cloth : alk. paper) — ISBn 0-231-13489-4 (pbk. : alk. paper) — ISBn 0-231-50911-1 (ebook) 1. Judaism. 2. Jews—Identity. I. Title. Bm45.s226 2006 296—dc22 2006018056 Casebound editions of Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America c 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 p 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 For Jacqueline r contents Acknowledgments ix Chronology xi Introduction 1 1 Promised Lands 22 2 Creating Judaism 69 3 Between Athens and Jerusalem 96 4 The Rabbis 115 5 Rabbinic Concepts 140 6 Mitzvot 164 7 The Rise of Reason 187 8 From Moses to Moses 209 9 Seeing God 229 10 East and West 250 Epilogue: Whither Judaism? 288 Glossary 297 Bibliographical Notes 307 Index 325 acknowledgments riting this Book has brought me far outside of my usual comfort zone, and I have turned to many colleagues, students, friends, and family for guidance. It is a pleasure for me to ac- Wknowledge their help and generosity.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Twenty-Four Judaism from the Arabian Conquests to the Crusades
    Chapter Twenty-Four Judaism from the Arabian Conquests to the Crusades From the Arabian conquests in the seventh century to the crusades, the circumstances of Judaeans differed greatly, depending on time and place. To summarize these circumstances crudely, we may say that Judaeans in the Dar al-Islam were much more secure than they were anywhere in Christendom. Within Christendom, the Byzantine empire and its Orthodox church were somewhat more hospitable to the Jewish minority than were western Europe and the Catholic church. In diachronic terms, for Judaeans everywhere the period before the crusades was far better than the period that followed. By the early eighth century the worship of God was widespread. Two other religions devoted to the worship of God - Christianity and Islam - were each in its own way doing very well. The Muslims had created an empire stretching from India to Spain, and the calif was the recipient of an enormous annual tribute paid by Judaeans and Christians. Politically and militarily the Christians were not so fortunate as the Muslims, and they were divided among several communions, but they far outnumbered the other two religions: the gospel was being preached to all nations, and tens of millions of people had become Christians. Judaeans had no empire nor, in the seventh century, even a kingdom, and they were a minority dependent upon the goodwill of the Muslims and upon the mercies of a variety of Christian rulers. Nevertheless, Judaeans in the seventh century were more certain than ever about their place in the world. Yahweh, who had begun as the god of Israel, had over the preceding twelve hundred years evolved into God.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing Christian Identity in Luke- Acts: the Purpose of Pharisees in Lukan Theology*
    Constructing Christian identity in Luke- Acts: the purpose of Pharisees in Lukan theology* Construindo uma identidade cristã em Lucas-Atos: o propósito dos fariseus na teologia lucana Monica Selvatici** Abstract: The purpose of this article is to analyze the references made Keywords: by the author of the third gospel and the book of Acts (so-called Luke) to Christian identity; members of the Christian communities in the 1st century CE who defended Christian literature; that Christians had to fully observe Torah laws and who especially defended Gospel of Luke; circumcision for Gentile Christians. Luke refers to them as ‘Pharisees’ in Acts of the Apostles; Acts 15, 5. Indirect allusions to these Christian Pharisees are ubiquitous Pharisees. in Luke’s work, showing that this issue was very important within his theology. When writing Luke-Acts, Luke was confronted with the sense of orphanhood of the Gentile Christian movement after the Apostle Paul’s death. Careful analysis of his books reveals more clearly the evangelist’s intent to convince his readers that the Gentile Christian movement is heir of the eschatological blessings promised to Judaism. Resumo: Este artigo tem por propósito analisar as referências feitas Palavras-chave: pelo autor do terceiro evangelho e do livro Atos dos Apóstolos (o assim Identidade cristã; chamado Lucas) a membros das comunidades cristãs no século I d.C. que Literatura cristã; defendiam que os cristãos deviam manter a observância completa das Evangelho de Lucas; leis da Torá e que defendiam, especialmente, a circuncisão dos cristãos Atos dos Apóstolos; gentílicos. Lucas se refere a eles como ‘fariseus’ em Atos 15, 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Resurrection and Immortality in Hellenistic Judaism: Navigating the Conceptual Boundaries
    RESURRECTION AND IMMORTALITY IN HELLENISTIC JUDAISM: NAVIGATING THE CONCEPTUAL BOUNDARIES C.D. Elledge In his popular study of the afterlife in Jewish thought, Neill Gillman de- scribes how resurrection of the dead and immortality of the soul within Second Temple Judaism would later merge and complement one another in the rabbis’ classic conception of “revivi cation of the dead” (íéúîä úééçú): From their predecessors, then, the talmudic rabbis inherited two doctrines about the afterlife: The rst taught that at some point after death, God would raise the body from the grave. The second taught that, at death, the body disintegrates and returns to dust, but the soul leaves the body and lives eternally. The rst, of uncertain provenance, is articulated in three biblical texts. The second, which originated in Greek thought, is not in the Bible. Both appear in the literature of the intertestamental period.1 Harry Wolfson described a parallel, if independent, development among the church fathers, who arrived at their own synthesis of resurrection and immortality: … to the Fathers of the Church these two beliefs were inseparably connected with each other. To them, the belief that Jesus rose on the third day after the Cruci xion meant that his soul survived the death of the body and was reinvested with his risen body. Similarly the belief that in the end of days there will be a general resurrection of the dead meant the reinvestment of surviving souls with risen bodies.2 These developments reveal the crucial context of the second-fourth cen- turies of the Common Era as a great age of synthesis for Judaism and Chris- tianity, in which earlier afterlife traditions were reinterpreted into classic a rmations of faith.
    [Show full text]
  • View, and Includes This Provision in the Copyright Notice
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NDL\86-5\NDL507.txt unknown Seq: 1 10-NOV-11 12:08 CREATIVITY AND CULTURAL INFLUENCE IN EARLY JEWISH LAW Roberta Rosenthal Kwall* INTRODUCTION Jewish law maintains that man is obliged to create and to renew the cosmos with his creative enterprise. According to Rabbi Joseph Soloveitchik, a leading modern authority on Jewish law, “[t]he peak of religious ethical perfection to which Judaism aspires is man as crea- tor.”1 Soloveitchik claims that the Torah chose to relate to man “the tale of creation” so that man could derive the law that humans are obligated to create.2 The Jewish religion introduced to the world that the “most fundamental principle of all is that man must create him- self.”3 According to Jewish law, man was not intended to be a passive recipient of the Torah, but rather “a partner with the Almighty in the act of creation.”4 Significantly, “[t]he power of creative interpretation is the very foundation of the received tradition.”5 Human creativity thus lies at the heart of Judaism, both from a theological and a legal standpoint. Therefore, there are many secular 2011 Roberta Rosenthal Kwall. Individuals and nonprofit institutions may reproduce and distribute copies of this article in any format, at or below cost, for educational purposes, so long as each copy identifies the author, provides a citation to the Notre Dame Law Review, and includes this provision in the copyright notice. * Raymond P. Niro Professor of Intellectual Property Law, Co-Director, DePaul University College of Law Center for Jewish Law & Judaic Studies; Founding Director, DePaul College of Law Center for Intellectual Property Law and Information Technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Judaism Is One of the World's Most Ancient Religions with a Rich And
    The Destruction of the Temple in 70 CE: Rabbinic Judaism as a New Religious Movement Ferdinando Musano A Thesis in The Department of Theological Studies Presented in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts (Theological Studies) at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada January 2017 © Ferdinando Musano 2017 Abstract The Destruction of the Temple in 70 CE: Rabbinic Judaism as New Religious Movement Judaism is one of the world’s most ancient religions with a rich and varied history. This history is recognizable through the most notable Hebrew Bible stories that tell how great leaders like Moses, Joshua, and Samson spread the word of God to their followers. It was also shaped by the considerable tumult and upheaval that marked the shifts between its eras. Here it is necessary to provide an overview of the historical events that led up to the era that I intend to examine in detail, which is the era following the destruction of the Second Temple in the year 70 CE. In this thesis, I will argue that Judaism evolved post 70 CE for the first time within a context of a new religious movement and we need to know why this historical shift was different from the others and why it made such an evolution possible. It was not the first disruption Judaism experienced, but the Judaism that emerged followed an evolutionary path much different than in previous historical eras, which were also defined by the upheavals that created them. This is the principal argument of my thesis. iii Dedication To all those who believed in me since the very beginning.
    [Show full text]