And Silver Carp, H. Molitrix (Valenciennes, 1844) Range Expansion on the Northwestern Front of the Invasion in North America

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

And Silver Carp, H. Molitrix (Valenciennes, 1844) Range Expansion on the Northwestern Front of the Invasion in North America BioInvasions Records (2014) Volume 3, Issue 4: 283–289 Open Access doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/bir.2014.3.4.10 © 2014 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2014 REABIC Rapid Communication Adult, juvenile and young-of-year bighead, Hypophthalmichthys nobilis (Richardson, 1845) and silver carp, H. molitrix (Valenciennes, 1844) range expansion on the northwestern front of the invasion in North America Cari-Ann Hayer*, Brian D.S. Graeb and Katie N. Bertrand South Dakota State University, Department of Natural Resource Management, Box 1240B, NPB 138, Brookings, SD 57006 USA E-mail: [email protected] (CAH), [email protected] (BDSG), [email protected] (KNB) *Corresponding author Received: 2 June 2014 / Accepted: 14 August 2014 / Published online: 23 September 2014 Handling editor: Vadim Panov Abstract Asian carps (bighead and silver carp) were collected with boat electrofishing over four years in three South Dakota tributaries to the Missouri River at the beginning of their invasion into this region. This paper documents their annual movement upstream into these tributaries and identifies differences in distribution by age-0, juvenile, and adults. By the end of this study in 2012, Asian carps dispersion was slowed or halted in these tributaries due to artificial and natural barriers. These records represent the northern most records of Asian carps in North America (46.931042, -98.708975). Key words: South Dakota, prairie streams, flooding, establishment, reproduction Introduction through numerous dams on the Mississippi River and into associated tributaries (e.g., Missouri River, Invasive species are becoming a worldwide Illinois River, Ohio River; Kolar et al. 2007; epidemic and are triggering changes in the USGS 2014). The northern extent of the Asian structure and function of invaded ecosystems carps expansion is in the Mississippi River basin. (Ricciardi et al. 2000). One pair of global invaders, They could potentially colonize the Great Lakes bighead, Hypophthalmichthys nobilis (Richardson, through the Chicago Shipping Canal (e.g., Lake 1845), and silver carp, H. molitrix (Valenciennes, Michigan) and the Illinois River, a tributary to the 1844), (collectively referred to as Asian carps) have Mississippi River (Kocovsky et al. 2012). The been introduced intentionally and unintentionally eastern range includes the Ohio River where they throughout the world, mostly for aquaculture threaten to enter the Great Lakes (e.g., Lake purposes (Kolar et al. 2007) as they are the most Erie) through the Wabash River, a tributary to important aquaculture species in Asia and east- the Ohio River, and the Maumee River, the second central Europe (Lieberman 1996; Penman et al. largest tributary to Lake Erie (Kocovsky et al. 2005). Bighead carp have been introduced to 74 2012). On the northwestern part of their expansion, countries and are reproducing in 19 and the silver Asian carps threaten to colonize three tributaries carp has been introduced to 88 countries and are (e.g., James, Vermillion, and Big Sioux rivers) to reproducing in 23 (Kolar et al. 2007). Both species the Missouri River below Gavins Point Dam, that of Asian carps are currently reproducing in the serve as important fish habitat for many threatened United States (Papoulias et al. 2006; DeGrandchamp and endangered fishes (Berry et al. 2007). These et al. 2007; Lohmeyer and Garvey 2009; Deters et tributaries already face disturbance from current al. 2013). Asian carps were originally introduced and present land use practices and natural into the southern United States in aquaculture physio-chemical and hydrologic fluctuations ponds in the early 1970s where both species characteristic of prairie streams (Matthews 1988; subsequently escaped and began their expansion Poff and Ward 1989; Hayer et al. 2014a). 283 C.-A. Hayer et al. Figure 1. Study area with standardized sampling sites (circles) spanning the James, Vermillion, and Big Sioux Rivers in the eastern part of North and South Dakota. Large barriers represent dams that presumably Asian carp cannot pass. 1= Gavins Point Dam, 23 m high, 2 = Jamestown Dam, 28 meters high, 3 = Vermillion Lake Dam, 12 m high, 4 = Sioux Falls, 8 m high. A = Shue creek, b = Lake Byron, c = Milltown, SD, d = Mitchell, SD. Prior to this study, the distribution and use by South Dakota to its confluence with the Missouri Asian carps of these three Missouri River Plains River (Berry et al. 1993; Figure 1). The James River tributaries in South Dakota were unknown. contains over 200 lowhead dams (approximately However; one bighead carp was caught by an 1–2 meters) that are passable by fish during high angler in the middle James River near Mitchell, water (Berry et al. 1993; Shearer and Berry 2003) South Dakota in 2008 and one silver carp was and 28 meter high dam in the North Dakota part caught by an angler in the Big Sioux River near of the river (Berry et al. 1993). The Vermillion Canton, SD in 2004 (Kolar et al. 2005). The goal River, the smallest basin (watershed area = 5,800 of this paper is to document the northwestern km2) extends 243 Rkm from the confluence of invasion front of adult, juvenile, and young-of- West and East Fork Vermillion rivers to its year Asian carps in three prairie tributaries and confluence with the Missouri River (Schmulbach other South Dakota waters (e.g., lakes) by and Braaten 1993; Figure 1). The Vermillion providing the northern most latitude detection River contains one larger dam, East Vermillion locations. Lake Dam, which creates Vermillion Lake and is 12 m high (Hayer et al. 2014b). The Big Sioux 2 Methods River (watershed area = 23,325 km ) extends 470 Rkm from the Prairie Coteau of northeastern Three prairie tributaries in South Dakota converge South Dakota to its confluence with the Missouri with an unchannelized section (Galat et al. 2005a) River at the South Dakota-Nebraska-Iowa border of the Missouri River just downstream of Gavins (Figure 1). The Big Sioux River contains a set of Point Dam: the James, Vermillion and Big Sioux natural falls that are deemed impassable by fish rivers. Gavins Point Dam is 23 m high hydro- (Dieterman and Berry 1998; Galat et al. 2005). electric dam and is the lower most dam on the The highest fall is 8 m high. Missouri River. No carp have been found upstream Standardized boat electrofishing occurred of this barrier. The three warmwater tributaries between 2009 and 2012 at five sites on the James drain the Central Lowlands physiographic province River, two sites on the Vermillion River, and in South Dakota (Galat et al. 2005b) and are three sites on the Big Sioux River (Figure 1), all characterized by low gradient streams of glacial within South Dakota. Sampling consisted of three origin (Hoagstrom et al. 2007). The James River 10 minute electrofishing runs which generally (watershed area = 57,000 km2) extends 760 Rkm covered three river kilometers. Sampling occurred from southeastern North Dakota through eastern once during each of three seasons: spring (May – 284 Asian carps expansion on the northwestern front Figure 2. Northern most collections of silver and bighead carp adults. Adults are 3 years old or more and greater than 600 mm TL. June), summer (July – August), and fall (September Silver carp have also only been collected in the – October). Additional non-standardized boat Big Sioux River at the confluence with the electrofishing occurred at various sites on the Missouri River and were last collected on August James River in North and South Dakota. Adult 17, 2012 (N = 5; TL = 634–783 mm; 3260–6123 g; carps were considered to be greater than 600 mm Figure 2). One adult bighead carp was collected TL (age 3+), juveniles were between 300 and near Mitchell (August, 31 2010) on the James 600 mm TL (ages 1 and 2), and age-0 were less River (TL = 1001, 9072 g) and no adults have than 300 mm TL. Life stage ages were verified been collected in the Vermillion or the Big Sioux by analyzing otoliths (Hayer et al. 2014b). Rivers (Figure 2). Results Juveniles Our data suggest that Asian carps dispersion has Twelve juvenile silver carp were collected from been slowed or halted in these Missouri River Shue Creek, a tributary to the James River north tributaries due to artificial and natural barriers. of Huron on September 27, 2011 (TL = 409 – These barriers are the most upstream collections 507; 768 – 1474 g; Figure 3). One juvenile silver within these river basins (Figure 1) where carp (450 mm, 1088 g) was subsequently collected bighead and silver carp were detected (Figures 2 in North Dakota on the James River in the –4). These findings represent the northernmost Jamestown Reservoir tailrace (Figures 3, 4) on Asian carps detections in North America October 12, 2011. This is the first record of (46.931042, -98.708975). silver carp in North Dakota. Fifteen silver carp (TL = 311–369 mm, 299–656 g) were collected from the Vermillion River below East Lake Adults Vermillion dam on August 11, 2011 and nineteen One adult silver carp was collected as far upstream were collected in the Big Sioux River at the as Milltown on the James River (TL = 752,4958 g) confluence with the Missouri River (TL = 384 – 474 on August 2, 2012 (Figure 2) and have not been mm; 510 – 1191; Figure 3) on August 17, 2012. collected above the confluence of the Vermillion Six juvenile bighead carp (415 – 509 mm TL, River with the Missouri River where nine silver 822 – 1389 g) were first collected from Firesteel carp were last collected on August 16, 2012 (TL Creek, a tributary to the James River near Mitchell = 681 – 784 mm; 3203 – 7285 g; Figure 2). on September 29, 2011 and were last collected 285 C.-A.
Recommended publications
  • Lake Elwell (Tiber Dam)
    Upper Missouri River Basin Water Year 2013 Summary of Actual Operations Water Year 2014 Annual Operating Plans U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Great Plains Region TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARIES OF OPERATION FOR WATER YEAR 2013 FOR RESERVOIRS IN MONTANA, WYOMING, AND THE DAKOTAS INTRODUCTION RESERVOIRS UNDER THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE MONTANA AREA OFFICE SUMMARY OF HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS AND FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS DURING WY 2013 ........................................................................................................................ 1 FLOOD BENEFITS...................................................................................................................... 12 UNIT OPERATIONAL SUMMARIES FOR WY 2013 .............................................................. 14 Clark Canyon Reservoir ............................................................................................................ 14 Canyon Ferry Lake and Powerplant ......................................................................................... 21 Helena Valley Reservoir ........................................................................................................... 32 Sun River Project ...................................................................................................................... 34 Gibson Reservoir .................................................................................................................. 34 Pishkun Reservoir ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 107 Part 208—Flood Control Regulations
    Corps of Engineers, Dept. of the Army, DoD § 208.10 PART 208—FLOOD CONTROL sponsible for the efficient operation REGULATIONS and maintenance of all of the struc- tures and facilities during flood periods Sec. and for continuous inspection and 208.10 Local flood protection works; mainte- maintenance of the project works dur- nance and operation of structures and fa- ing periods of low water, all without cilities. cost to the United States. 208.11 Regulations for use of storage allo- (3) A reserve supply of materials cated for flood control or navigation and/ or project operation at reservoirs subject needed during a flood emergency shall to prescription of rules and regulations be kept on hand at all times. by the Secretary of the Army in the in- (4) No encroachment or trespass terest of flood control and navigation. which will adversely affect the effi- 208.19 Marshall Ford Dam and Reservoir cient operation or maintenance of the (Mansfield Dam and Lake Travis), Colo- project works shall be permitted upon rado River, Tex. 208.22 Twin Buttes Dam and Reservoir, Mid- the rights-of-way for the protective fa- dle and South Concho Rivers, Tex. cilities. 208.25 Pensacola Dam and Reservoir, Grand (5) No improvement shall be passed (Neosho) River, Okla. over, under, or through the walls, lev- 208.26 Altus Dam and Reservoir, North Fork ees, improved channels or floodways, Red River, Okla. nor shall any excavation or construc- 208.27 Fort Cobb Dam and Reservoir, Pond (Cobb) Creek, Oklahoma. tion be permitted within the limits of 208.28 Foss Dam and Reservoir, Washita the project right-of-way, nor shall any River, Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • 09-003, Spring Flooding April 23, 2009 1:00 P.M. CDT Incident Summary Report #54
    09-003, Spring Flooding April 23, 2009 1:00 p.m. CDT Incident Summary Report #54 Incident Overview Summaries are published once daily after 1:00 p.m. Updated information is in red. The following is a summary of key issues related to the 2009 spring flood for the Red River of the North, Souris, Devils Lake, James, Sheyenne and Missouri River Basins. State Emergency Operations Center (SEOC) Activation – Level I (Full Activation) Significant Events ¾ Deaths/Injuries – as reported by the N.D. Department of Health Deaths – 2 Injuries – 235 Illnesses – 67 ¾ Rescues Rescues – 139 Animal Rescues – 135 ¾ Livestock Losses – estimated losses reported by the Farm Service Agency (FSA) and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) County Emergency Boards. Calves – 71,823 Cattle – 19,107 Horses – 180 Other Livestock – 2,948 390 producers may be requesting assistance with carcass disposal. (Some producers may not meet eligibility – above normal death loss - for assistance requests) –April 19 ¾ Carcass Removal Kidder County o Officials located approximately 75 livestock carcasses for transport and disposal. - April 22 Cass County o Officials located approximately 25-30 livestock carcasses for transport and disposal. – April 22 ¾ Evacuations/Sheltering Valley City – 250 Evacuees Open Shelters o There are no American Red Cross (ARC) managed or partner shelters open. 1 Local shelters on stand by - April 23 o Oriska School o Sacred Heart Church, Sanborn o Lisbon School (independent shelter) o Jamestown High School State Shelters on stand by -April 20 o Horizon Middle School o Charity Lutheran Church o Century High School o Hughes Administration Building o Simile Middle School o Bismarck High School o Mandan Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH DAKOTA FISHING GUIDE 2016-2018 (Effective April 1, 2016 Through March 31, 2018)
    NORTH DAKOTA FISHING GUIDE 2016-2018 (Effective April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2018) North Dakota Game and Fish Department 100 N. Bismarck Expressway Bismarck, ND 58501-5095 701-328-6300 Email: [email protected] Website: www.gf.nd.gov TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1 New for 2016-2018 Fishing Seasons...................... 4 2 Licenses.................................................................. 6 3 Fish and Bait Definitions ......................................... 7 4 Possession and Transportation of Fish and Bait .... 8 Baitfish and Bait................................................. 8 Game and Nongame Fish................................ 10 5 General Regulations ............................................. 12 6 Bait Regulations.................................................... 13 7 Manner of Taking .................................................. 14 A. Hook and Line Fishing...................................... 14 Open Areas and Season Dates ..................... 14 Statewide Daily and Possession Limits ......... 16 Exceptions .................................................. 17 Specific Regulation Information ..................... 17 Fish Size Restrictions .................................... 19 Fish Length-Weight Table ........................... 20 Ice Fishing Regulations ................................. 21 Fish Houses................................................... 22 B. Darkhouse Spearfishing .................................. 23 C. Archery and Spearfishing ................................ 24 D. Underwater Spearfishing
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Office of Management and Budget on the U.S. Fish And
    Report to the Office of Management and Budget on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Fisheries Mitigation Programs Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service May 28,2002 Table of Contents Introduction Definition of Terms General Authorities Recommendations to Facilitate Full Cost Recovery Recommendations for Administrative Actions Recommendations for Legislation Current Fisheries Mitigation Programs Overview Description of Fisheries Mitigation Programs Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tennessee Valley Authority National Marine Fisheries Service Bonneville Power Administration Bureau of Indian Affairs U.S. Department of Agriculture Appendix I Recent Directives and Recommendations for Fisheries Mitigation Programs 75 Appendix I1 List of Hatcheries involved in Mitigation and State Location 77 Appendix I11 List of Species Raised for Mitigation Programs 78 INTRODUCTION The predecessor of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), the U.S. Commission on Fish and Fisheries, was formed in 1871 to protect and enhance fisheries which were being depleted by a growing Nation. Since that time, the Service's Fisheries Program, including the National Fish Hatchery System (NFHS), has been involved in, among other things, mitigating the losses of fish habitats, fish populations, and fishing opportunities. The U.S. Congress and the Courts have provided laws, appropriations, and orders which have authorized the construction and operation of dams, and other water diversion projects. The construction and operation of these Federal water resource development projects have had impacts on many water systems and their respective fish populations. The construction and operation of these projects have resulted in the need to build and operate fish hatcheries to provide direct mitigation (e.g., provide disease-free fish eggs or fish for stocking) for waters impaired by Federal water resource development projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Missouri River Basin Water Year 2017 Summary of Actual
    Upper Missouri River Basin Water Year 2017 Summary of Actual Operations U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Great Plains Region TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARIES OF OPERATION FOR WATER YEAR 2017 FOR RESERVOIRS IN MONTANA, WYOMING AND THE DAKOTAS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. i INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... iv MONTANA AREA OFFICE WY 2017 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 1 October through December ......................................................................................................... 1 January through March ............................................................................................................... 8 April through June .................................................................................................................... 10 July through September ............................................................................................................ 13 FLOOD BENEFITS...................................................................................................................... 16 UNIT OPERATIONAL SUMMARIES FOR WY 2017 .............................................................. 19 Clark Canyon Reservoir ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Design Memorandum No. Jp-2C Master Plan
    DESIGN MEMORANDUM NO. JP-2C MASTER PLAN JAMES RIVER PIPESTEM LAKE, NORTH DAKOTA UPDATED OCTOBER 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District CENWO-OD-TN ( 111 0-2-240a) 3 April2006 MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD SUBJECT: James River, Pipestem Lake, North Dakota, Design Memorandum No.JP2C, Supplement 1 1. The above supplement is an update of specific pages in the above titled Design Memorandum. The listing below identifies the pages that have been updated. The updated pages are enclosed. a. Page iv- updates the Surface Area (acres) Spillway Design Flood and Flood Control- "Full Pool." b. Page v- updates the Surface Area (acres) Multipurpose Pool. c. Page II-6 -updates 11. CULTURAL RESOURCES paragraph by adding "Cultural Resources Management Plan" for Pipestem Dam and Lake, North Dakota. d. Page II-7- updates paragraph 13.1, second line to read "flows in excess of 1,250 c.f.s." e. Page Il-9- updates TABLE 1. f. Page II-14- updates TABLE 2 to include 2005 Visitors and Visitor Hours information. g. Page Il-15- update~ TABLE 3. y "-''<1''-rt IL<+V-· 2. The subject Design Memorandum No. JP-2C, Supplement I, is approved. 7 Encls ~~?-y--~-­ as ~ Commanding FIFE STEM CREEK DAM AND LAKE, JAMES RIVER J\ASIN, NORTH DAKOTA. PERTINENT DATA (All elevations given are feet above mean sea level) PROJECT AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Act of 1965, Public Law 89-298. Specific Purposes, Flood Control, Recreation, and Fish and t{ildlife . LOCATION . On Pipestem Creek about 4 miles north~T e st of Jamesto~· n , North Dako ta! and approximately the same distance above the confluence ~ith the James River.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Characteristics of Bighead and Silver Carp on the Northwestern Front of Their North American Invasion
    Aquatic Invasions (2014) Volume 9, Issue 3: 289–303 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/ai.2014.9.3.05 Open Access © 2014 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2014 REABIC Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species (April 21–25, 2013, Niagara Falls, Canada) Research Article Population characteristics of bighead and silver carp on the northwestern front of their North American invasion Cari-Ann Hayer1*, Jason J. Breeggemann1, Robert A. Klumb2†, Brian D.S. Graeb1 and Katie N. Bertrand1 1South Dakota State University, Department of Natural Resource Management, Box 1240B, NPB 138, Brookings, SD 57006, USA 2U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Great Plains Fish & Wildlife Conservation Office, 420 South Garfield Avenue, Suite 400, Pierre, South Dakota 57501, USA † Deceased 08 July 2013 E-mail: [email protected] (CAH), [email protected] (JJB), [email protected] (BDSG), [email protected] (KNB) *Corresponding author Received: 1 October 2013 / Accepted: 1 July 2014 / Published online: 2 August 2014 Handling editor: Vadim Panov Abstract Invasive species are considered the second largest threat to native biodiversity, and ecosystem function and services. One pair of global invaders, bighead, Hypophthalmichthys nobilis, and silver carp, H. molitrix, (collectively referred to as Asian carps) have been introduced throughout the world, and are invading three prairie stream tributaries to the Missouri River in the United States. There is a paucity of knowledge and understanding about Asian carp population characteristics and biology in North America. As such, we documented spatial and temporal trends in population dynamics (i.e., density, size structure, age, growth and condition) of Asian carps in three tributaries to the Missouri River in South Dakota: Big Sioux, James and Vermillion from 2009 to 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities March 2011
    RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities March 2011 Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities Prepared by United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Power Resources Office U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Denver, Colorado March 2011 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Disclaimer Statement The report contains no recommendations. Rather, it identifies a set of candidate sites based on explicit criteria that are general enough to address all sites across the geographically broad scope of the report. The report contains limited analysis of environmental and other potential constraints at the sites. The report must not be construed as advocating development of one site over another, or as any other site-specific support for development. There are no warranties, express or implied, for the accuracy or completeness of any information, tool, or process in this report. Contents Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities Contents Page Executive Summary ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report- 1994
    i US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Annual Report- 1994 Tributary Reservoir Regulation Activities {August 1993 - July 1994) Prepared by: Water Control Section Hydrologic Engineering Branch Engineering Division Omaha, Nebraska December 1994 MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION OMAHA DISTRICT SUMMARY OF 1993-1994 I. PURPOSE AND SCOPE ......................................... 1 II. REFERENCES ............................................... 1 Ill. RESERVOIRS IN THE OMAHA DISTRICT ........................... 1 a. Reservoirs with Flood Control Storage .......................... 1 b. Reservoirs without Flood Control Storage . 2 IV. TRIBUTARY RUNOFF ......................................... 3 V. RESERVOIR ACCOMPLISHMENTS ............................... 11 a. Flood Damages Prevented . 11 b. Recreation Usage . 11 VI. RESERVOIR OPERATION ..................................... 11 a. Previous Years Operation (August 1, 1993 through July 31, 1994) . 11 (1) Corps of Engineers Lakes . 11 (a) Bear Creek Reservoir, Colorado . 11 (b) Chatfield Reservoir, Colorado ..................... 18 (c) Cherry Creek Reservoir, Colorado ................. 18 (d) Bowman-Haley, North Dakota .................... 18 (e) Pipestem, North Dakota ......................... 18 (f) Papillion Creek Basin, Nebraska . 19 (g) Salt Creek Basin, Nebraska . 19 (2) Bureau of Reclamation Dams ......................... 19 Jamestown Dam, North Dakota . 19 (b) Proposed Operations .................................... 19 (1) Corps of Engineers . 19 (a) North Dakota . 20 (b) South Dakota ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Jamestown Dam and Reservoir Project, P-SMBP, Noth Dakota
    Jamestown Dam and Reservoir Unit Garrison Diversion Unit Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program Wm. Joe Simonds Bureau of Reclamation 1996 Table of Contents Jamestown Dam and Reservoir...................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................2 Project Authorization.....................................................3 Construction History .....................................................4 Investigations.....................................................4 Construction......................................................4 Post-Construction History.................................................7 Settlement of Project Lands ................................................9 Project Benefits and Uses of Project Water....................................9 Conclusion............................................................10 About the Author .............................................................10 Bibliography ................................................................12 Archival Collections ....................................................12 Government Documents .................................................12 Letters and Memorandum ................................................12 Books ................................................................12 Interviews.............................................................12 Index ......................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared in Cooperation with the North Dakota State Water Commission
    Prepared in cooperation with the North Dakota State Water Commission 2009 Spring Floods in North Dakota, Western Minnesota, and Northeastern South Dakota Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5225 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Streamgage at Cedar Creek near Haynes, North Dakota on March 22, 2009 (fig. 2, site 33). Photograph by U.S. Geological Survey personnel. 2009 Spring Floods in North Dakota, Western Minnesota, and Northeastern South Dakota By Kathleen M. Macek-Rowland and Tara A. Gross Prepared in cooperation with the North Dakota State Water Commission Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5225 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Macek-Rowland, K.M., and Gross, T.A., 2011, 2009 Spring floods in North Dakota, western Minnesota, and northeast- ern South Dakota: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5225, 41 p.
    [Show full text]