DOCSLIB.ORG

The Law of Public Consultation in Regulatory And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE LAW OF PUBLIC CONSULTATION IN REGULATORY AND LEGISLATIVE PROCESSES IN THE UNITED STATES, UNITED KINGDOM AND THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA By Živilė Stubrytė Submitted to Central European University Department of Legal Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of CEU eTD Collection Doctor of Juridical Science Supervisor: Professor Michael Hamilton Budapest, Hungary 2014 The dissertation contains no materials accepted for any other degrees in any other institutions and no materials previously written and/or published by another person unless otherwise acknowledged. s/Živilė Stubrytė CEU eTD Collection 2 ABSTRACT The thesis seeks to determine the effects of the role of law when framing the opportunities for public consultation in government policy and decision-making. The focus is to examine how requirements for decision-makers to hold public consultation enable meaningful participation by interested individuals in decision-making processes leading to a more responsive, professional and less intrusive regulatory government. The first chapter provides a detailed account of theories of deliberative and participatory democracy, which advocate for transformation of representative institutions. It concludes with an observation that it is worth investigating the existing consultative opportunities in decision-making processes in order to determine whether such transformations are necessary. The second chapter investigates the developments of law of public consultation taking as a benchmark the criteria for ideal participation and deliberation. The results of the analysis reveal that the nature and scope of consultative obligations are predetermined on such factors as the subject matter and the impact of the decision on an individual or the public in general. In this respect the third and fourth chapters examine consultative processes in particular regulatory areas to determine the similarities and differences of enforcement of participatory rights as well as their impact on regulated industries. The fifth and final chapter determines how different legal structures recognize participatory rights, and under what conditions consultative obligations can remedy the flaws of representative democracy. CEU eTD Collection The thesis aims to contribute to the existing debates about transforming representative democracy through introduction of participatory and deliberative mechanisms. The dissertation suggests that in the US, the UK and South Africa the existing legal frameworks are capable of facilitating public participation and deliberation through consultative obligations which reinvigorate representative democracy. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks to my beloved parents for their endless love, understanding, moral support and financial contributions. Thanks to my brothers for their acceptance even without understanding, for how much longer am I going to study. Thanks to my friends for their encouraging words, for their challenging thoughts, for just being there for me. I feel helplessly indebted to my supervisor Professor Michael Hamilton for his support from the very beginning of this journey, and guidance through what sometimes seemed as obstacles impossible to overcome, for keeping the bar high and pushing to excel. I owe my gratitude for Professor Jeff Lubbers who provided me with constructive criticism and set the right tone to the writing. Thanks to Central European University and its community, for all the opportunities to learn from the best, the diverse and the open. The journey was longer than I thought it would be, but I have learned more than I have expected. The process of getting to the finish line was a reward in itself. CEU eTD Collection 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................... 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 7 Thesis Outline ........................................................................................................................ 7 Choice of Jurisdictions ........................................................................................................... 9 Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 12 Relevance of the Research and its Contribution .................................................................. 13 1. Public Deliberation and Participation as a Solution to the Challenges faced by Regulatory Government .............................................................................................................................. 15 1.1. From Representative to Regulatory Government ..................................................... 15 1.2. Revitalizing Representative Government through Participation and Deliberation ....... 26 1.3. The Ideals of Participation and Deliberation ................................................................. 29 1.4. Defining the Meaningfulness of Participation and Deliberation ................................... 34 1.4.1. Informed Debate ..................................................................................................... 35 1.4.2. Equality .................................................................................................................. 36 1.4.3. Inclusiveness and Representation ........................................................................... 37 1.4.4. Reasoned Debate .................................................................................................... 39 1.4.5. Influence and Respect ............................................................................................ 40 1.5. Why Representative Government Needs Participatory Rights ..................................... 43 1.5.1. Democracy and Procedural Fairness ...................................................................... 44 1.5.2. Unprofessionalism in Regulatory Government ...................................................... 46 1.5.3. Alienation of the Public from Politics and the Lack of Responsiveness by Decision-makers ............................................................................................................... 47 1.5.4. Over-regulation, Big Government and the Potential of Public Participation to Enhance Governmental Accountability ........................................................................... 52 1.5.5. Supplementing the Rights of Freedom of Expression and Freedom of Information .......................................................................................................................................... 56 1.6. Enhanced Opportunities for Public Participation and Deliberation: A Critique and its Rebuttal ................................................................................................................................ 58 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................... 65 2. The Emerging Law of Public Consultation .......................................................................... 67 2.1. Opportunities to Participate in Rulemaking in the United States of America .............. 67 2.2. ‘Obligation to facilitate participation’ under South Africa’s Constitution ................... 70 2.3. The Government’s Commitment to Consultation in the United Kingdom ................... 73 2.4. Opportunities for Public Participation at the International Level ................................. 77 2.5. The Law of Public Consultation: Different Contexts, Similar Requirements ............... 80 2.5.1. Opportunities to Comment on a Proposed Decision or Policy............................... 82 2.5.2. Disclosure as a Prerequisite of Proper Notification ............................................... 97 2.5.3. Consideration of the Inputs made by the Participants .......................................... 105 CEU eTD Collection Conclusions .................................................................................................................... 121 3. Public Consultations in Specific Regulatory Areas – Telecommunications ...................... 122 3.1. Regulation in Telecommunications: Protection of Consumer Interests and Promotion of Competition ........................................................................................................................ 123 3.2. Consultative Obligations of Telecommunications Regulatory Authorities ................ 128 3.3. Public Consultation as a Means for Furthering Telecommunications Regulatory Policies ............................................................................................................................... 131 3.4. Taming the Broad Discretion of the Telecommunications Regulatory Authorities with Procedural Fairness and the Strictness of the Rules ........................................................... 143 5 4. Public Consultations in Specific Regulatory Areas – Environmental Matters .................. 154 4.1. Public Participation as a Guiding Principle in Environmental Governance ............... 154 4.2. Public Participation as a Means of Exchanging Environmental Information between the Decision-makers and Interested Parties ............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Southern Africa Record

    Southern Africa Record

    SOUTHERN AFRICA RECORD contains the original texts of, or extracts from, important statements by political leaders, government representatives and international organisations, concerning international relations in the southern region of Africa. In addition to statements on issues of current concern, some significant statements made in the past are included in the RECORD from time to time. The reproduction of these policy statements of the past and present is intended for information and reference purposes, not only for students, but also for all those who are concerned with the relations between the countries of Southern Africa. Statements are reproduced if and when texts become available (not in chronological order), and it must be emphasised that the selection- of statements included in SOUTHERN AFRICA RECORD should not be regarded in any sense as indicating a viewpoint as to the relative impor- tance of one or other statement over another not reproduced or repro- duced in a later number of the RECORD. In any case, as the Institute itself cannot, in terms of its Constitution, hold a viewpoint on any aspect of international affairs, no views expressed in any statement reproduced in the RECORD should be identified with the Institute. Compiler: Sonja Begg Published by the South African Institute of International Affairs. Four issues per year. Subscription rate R10.00 per annum (surface mail). R14.00 per annum (airmail) Africa and Europe. R15.00 US and elsewhere. Price per copy R2.50 (plus postage for overseas airmail). Uitgegee deur die Suid-Afrikaanse Instituut van Internasionaie Aangeleenthede. Vier uitgawes per iaar. Intekengeld R10.00 per jaar (lanrjpos).
  • S. /Ricbael's Chronicle Michaelhouse October, 1974

    S. /Ricbael's Chronicle Michaelhouse October, 1974

    S. /Ricbael's Chronicle Michaelhouse October, 1974 STAFF 1974 RECTOR: R. F. Pennington, M.A. (Oxon) SENIOR MASTER: k. Gathorne, M.A. (Rhodes) J. R. Blake, M.A. (Cantab). N. C. F. Bloy, M.A. (Oxon). G. G. Bompas, B.Sc., U.E.D. (Natal). Rev H. C. Clark, L.Th. (Chaplain). J. Coetzee, B.A. T.T.D. (South Africa). A. F. G. Cotton, B.A. (Rhodes), B.Ed. (Natal). M. E. Crampton, B.A. (Natal), B.Ed. (South Africa). E. R. de Villiers, B.A., U.E.D. (Rhodes). A. E. G. Duff, M.A. (Rhodes). D. S. Gear, B.A. (Wits). M. T. Goulding, B.Sc. (Wits) R. H. W. Hall, B.A., U.E.D. (Natal). Rev R. R. Hawkins, B.D. (London), B.A. (Natal). R. W. Hennessy, B.A., B.Ed. (Stellenbosch). E. G. Hilditch, B.Sc. (Belfast). F. J. Human, B.A., U.E.D. (Free State). R. L. Ibbotson, M.A. (Cantab). G. H. Immelman, B.Sc., U.E.D. (Rhodes). J. S. Inglis, B.A. (Oxon), B.Sc., U.E.D. (Stellenbosch). D. E. Knight, B.A. (Wits). G. V. Lange, B.A. (South Africa). P. G. Lavender, N.A.D. (Art). B. A. Law, M.A. (Oxon). W. E. Layne, B.A. (Dartmouth, U.S.A.). C. H. D. Leggatt, B.Sc. (Cape Town). B. R. Lewis, B.Sc., U.E.D. (Natal). J. P. Lowe, B.Sc. (Natal). D. B. Miles, tf.Sc., U.E. D. (Natal). D. J. Moon, B.A., U.E.D. (Natal). K. J. Mullen, A.P.T.C.
  • Michaelhouse Chronicle 1997 CENTEI^RY EDITION

    Michaelhouse Chronicle 1997 CENTEI^RY EDITION

    Michaelhouse Chronicle 1997 CENTEI^RY EDITION This little one stayed at home This little one had roast beef This little one had none This little one went to market Unit Trusts still offer one of the best wealth-creating, inflation- beating investments available. But the market can be uncertain at times. At Sanlam, our specialist Unit Trusts team use knowledge, FM Sanlam III Unit Trusts Your investment in good hands experience, skill and an ear to the ground to protect the value of our investors' money, no matter what. Give us a call. It's one little decision you'll never regret. Phone 0800 220 567 toll-free between 08h00 and 17h00. Sanlam Unit Trus ts are now available through the internet at http://www.sanlam.co.za. The selling and repurchase prices of units are based on ruling share pric es and the value of the units therefore fluctuates accordingly from time to time. Besides an initial charge not exceeding 5%, a service charge of 1/12 of 1,14%, calculated on the market value of the portfolio at the e nd of every month, is levied, as well as an obligatory cost included in th e purchase price. Returns are based on actual unit prices and include the reinvestment of distributions. Should you wish to convert all or part of your investment into cash, the management company will purchase units from you at the ruling price in accordance with the Unit Trusts Control Act and the applicable trust deeds. BERRY BUSH/BBDO SAN 0029/E Michaelhouse Chronicle MICHAELHOUSE, BALGOWAN 3275 • MARCH 1997 ADDRESS BY MR A J ARDINGTON, CHAIR- MAN OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS, AT THE UNVEILING OF THE PLAQUE AT THE ORIGINAL SITE OF MICHAELHOUSE AT NO.
  • Memories of Michaelhouse the First 100 Years < //E/?I(>R(C's Sf « /Jfe

    Memories of Michaelhouse the First 100 Years < //E/?I(>R(C's Sf « /Jfe

    Memories of Michaelhouse The First 100 Years < //e/?i(>r(C'S sf « /Jfe/iae//o(('S'e The First One Hundred Years 1896-1996 Introduction / remember, I remember the house where I was born, the little window w here the sun came peeping in at morn. Thomas Hood. As we grow older our memories become more precious to us, and most vivi dly we recall the turbulent years of our adolescence, our hopes and fea rs, our loves and hates, our triumphs and our failures. Memories of school days at Michaelhouse are unique for each individual, b ut the photographs and stories in this book, reflecting each decade of th e school's hundred years, will, we hope, evoke for every old boy a pleasa nt feeling of nostalgia. Each reader can people the familiar places with his own contemporaries and the staff of his day. Yesterday evening, Sunday 14th May, 1995, I was roaming around the estat e. Autumn leaves carpeted the ground and the setting sun bathed the vall ey in a romantic rosy glow. I felt nostalgic. As I passed by the chapel I thought of Charles Hannah making his annual visit and hopefully 'final ' farewell sermon. None of us cared to hear for the umpteenth time the o ld man's reminiscences, including how he had walked round the Oval with Canon Todd deciding where each tree was to be planted. Passing through t he passage way, where the staff nowadays collect their post from their p igeonholes, I remember it as the entrance hall of the Rectory, and I rec all dinner parties in these rooms which are now offices, Fred and Margar et Snell our gracious hosts.
  • T' ...Ro Empf T&Pr B] &Mth West Africa' MANDATE IN

    T' ...Ro Empf T&Pr B] &Mth West Africa' MANDATE IN

    ,ATE ,ATE R T US,"T' ............. ro empf T&pr b] &mth West Africa' MANDATE IN TRUST The problem of South West Africa PUBLISHED BY THE AFRICA I960 COMMITTEE 33 RUTLAND GATE S.W.7 Members of the Africa 1960 Committee THE HON. ALASTAIR BUCHAN CHRISTOPHER CHATAWAY, M.P. L. B. GREAVES RICHARD HORNBY, M.P. CHARLES JANSON JAMES LEMKIN IAN LLOYD THE EARL OF MARCH JOHN MARGETSON ROLAND OLIVER MRS. MERVYN RAYNER SIR ROBIN WILLIAMS, Bt. MICHAEL WOOD INDEX Page INTRODUCTION 5 THE COUNTRY AND THE PEOPLE 7 THE ATTITUDE OF SOUTH AFRICA 9 THE ADMINISTRATION: A DE FACTO ANNEXATION I I DOMESTIC POLITICS OF SOUTH WEST AFRICA 14 The European Community 14 The non-white Community 15 THE INTERNATIONAL STATUS OF SOUTH WEST AFRICA 20 The Mandate of the League of Nations 20 The Move for Incorporation 20 International status under the United Nations 21 South Africa's Argument 25 THE COMMONWEALTH RESPONSIBILITY 27 CONCLUSIONS 29 INTRODUCTION In 1918, South Africa was given a Mandate over South West Africa under the Mandates System of the League of Nations. This system was succeeded by the International Trusteeship System of the United Nations Organisation. South Africa is the only one of the former Mandatory Powers which refused to submit a Trusteeship Agreement for its Mandated Territory, and thus to bring it under the general supervision of the General Assembly of the United Nations. For fourteen years, therefore, the Mandate over South West Africa has been discussed in the United Nations. During that time the International Court ofJustice has given an advisory opinion and two supplementary opinions defining South Africa's obligations concerning the Territory, and South Africa has not complied with them.

  • % Michaelhouse €¢ May 1991

    % MICHAELHOUSE • MAY 1991 MICHAELHOUSE, BALGOWAN 3275 • MAY 1991 GOVERNORS Visitor: The Rt Revd Bishop of Natal Chairman: Mr A.J. Ardington Deputy Chairman: Mr D.A. Guthrie Mr J.R. Anderson Mr M.G. Armstrong Mr A.M.A. Campbell MrR.K. Collins Mr A.R. Evans Mr P.A. Gallo Mr D.A. Guthrie Mr J.E. Harker Mr J.H. Henderson MrB.E. Hersov MrW.F. Lambert Mr R.l. Lister Mrl.N. Matthews Revd Prof. L.E. Peters MrR.K. Ridgway MrD.L. Stewart MrR.S. Steyn Associate Governors: Mr J.A. Craven DrR. Hiddleston Secretary to The Board of Governors: Mr R.C. Brookes. Michaelhouse, Balgowan 3275 RECTOR J.H. Pluke, BA, UED (Natal) SENIOR MASTER (ACADEMIC) P.J. Snyder, BSc (Rhodes), PGCE (London) SENIOR MASTER (ADMINISTRATION) A.E. Duff, MA (Rhodes), HED (UNISA) ASSISTANT SENIOR MASTER D.M.R. Lewis. MA (Cantab) Dip Ed (Oxon) STAFF W.E. Ashmole, BA, UED (Rhodes) P.J. Bath, MSoc Sc (Clin. Psych.) Rhodes J.M. Buckley, BSc (UCT), PGCE (London) G.J. Burgess, National Education Diploma (Pretoria) N.G. Cahill, HDE (Edgewood) A.L. Carter, PrEng, BSc (Hons), (University of Wales) A.W.H. Cook, BA (Hons), (Rhodes), HED (UNISA) R.A. Currie, BComm, HDE, BED (Natal) A.M. Daniels, BA, HDE (Natal) P.E. Dennyson, MA (Hons) (St Andrew's), Dip Ed (Edinburgh) D Duthie, PhD (Natal), HED (UNISA) N.D.R. Elkington, BA (Cape Town) A.L. Eysele, BSc (Natal), HDE (Edgewood) P.C. Fleischack, BSc (Hons) (Wits), MSc (Natal), HDE (SA) E.E.
  • University of Birmingham the Limits Of

    University of Birmingham the Limits Of

    University of Birmingham The limits of the ‘Liberal imagination’ Schaffer, Gavin DOI: 10.1093/pastj/gty005 Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Schaffer, G 2018, 'The limits of the ‘Liberal imagination’: Britain, broadcasting, and apartheid South Africa, 1948- 1994', Past & Present, vol. 240, no. 1, pp. 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gty005 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Past and Present following peer review. The version of record Gavin Schaffer, The Limits of the ‘Liberal Imagination’: Britain, Broadcasting and Apartheid South Africa, 1948–1994, Past & Present, Volume 240, Issue 1, August 2018, Pages 235–266, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gty005article/doi/10.1093/pastj/gty005/4965957 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain.
  • Autumn 2004 SCIENCE in PARLIAMENT

    Autumn 2004 SCIENCE in PARLIAMENT

    Autumn 2004 SCIENCE IN PARLIAMENT Land Use and Management Obesity Exciting Science Industrial Biotechnology Minerals and Materials Underpinning Industry SCIENCE IN Science in Parliament has two main objectives: a) to inform the scientific and industrial communities PARLIAMENT of activities within Parliament of a scientific nature The Journal of the Parliamentary and Scientific Committee. and of the progress of relevant legislation; The Committee is an Associate Parliamentary Group b) to keep Members of Parliament abreast of members of both Houses of Parliament and British members of the European Parliament, representatives of scientific affairs. of scientific and technical institutions, industrial organisations and universities. Contents Autumn 2004 Volume 61 Number 4 Science and Innovation network – at work 2 Opinion by Bill Rammell MP Farewell to Chips? 3 Opinion by Dr Douglas Naysmith MP Biology IS the Future 4 Opinion by Catherine Joynson and Alan Malcolm Bolton Technical Innovation Centre Ltd 5 Dr Brian Iddon MP Sir Trevor Skeet 6 Obituary by Sir Ian Lloyd In this issue Bill Rammell’s Science and British Metrication 7 Innovation network spans the globe in search of Robin Paice partners for UK Ltd. We learn how obesity is the Land Use and Management 8 most important preventable cause of cancer, and Addresses to the P&SC by Lord Haskins and Tim Bennett the food industry is given three years to introduce Obesity and the Role of Government in Diet 12 voluntary controls or face regulation. Biology is Addresses to the P&SC by Derek Wanless, Professor Robert Pickard the Future for Catherine Joynson and Alan and Gaynor Bussell Malcolm who record a predominance of female students and Brian Iddon’s Bolton Technical Materials and Minerals 18 Innovation Centre brings young people closer to Dr Nuna Staniaszek, The Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining industry.
  • Nusa 1 9 6 5

    Nusa 1 9 6 5

    NEWS SL"AMARY ON RHODESIA NEWS SL"AMARY ON RHODESIA National Student Christian Federation Committee on Southern Africa 475 Riverside Drive, Room 754, New-York, New York 10027 NOVEMBER 28: Rouan Catholic Church- speaks out: The strongest church attack on the Smith regime was issued by the Roman Catholic church in a pastoral letter distributed after the services today. It called attention to the dangers of-placing nationalism, race, or economics above'a basic concern for man. It refuted the idea that white silence has neant consent, Rather the silence is a silence of "fear, disappointment, and hopelessness". It condemned Smith for declaring independence and said that the country's racial policies were just asking for trouble. There are- 23,000 white Catholics, 304,000 black Catholics and 4,000 of mixed blood., Other churchmen, have also spoken out. However, in spite of the strong opposition expressed by the Anglican Archbishop of Salisbury, the Anglican church is very divided in its response to U.D.I. British Troops for Zambia: Zambia has &&ked Britian for troops to protect the Kariba dam and is preparing a course of action if Britian refuses. Kaunda called a special cabinet meeting to lay out such plans. However, they will probably not be necessary. Malcolm MacDonald is back in Britian and met with Wilson. MacDonald was expected to analyse the reality of Zambia's statement that it would seek aid elsewhere if Britian refused to act. MacDonald a13o has influence in Conservative circles which could be extremely important in getting their support for a British force in Zambia.
  • Even Day It Doe

    Even Day It Doe

    fA fA Deceber l988/January 1989 The newspaper of the Anti-Apartheid Movemnent I 30p Pafrtijpats in a raly in Winlnk to cebibrate tNmibia Day -- iPatient før fredøm NEWS OFROM SOUTHERN AFRICA bna7 ANIARPTHEIDNEWS'a cls snt ta all nato1al r emnbeas of the AltI-Aparbid Moraitent sea membership trm an back page for DESIGNED by Rager Huddla, Artwakea TYPESET by Nancy Wbite PRINTED by East End ifsot Lid, Empsen Sweet, Bromley-by-Bow London E3 3LT ISSN M3-558 onternational etannhtiocSom deli-d :. ; reinted materialfoin bem exponetnd to Sonthi Afrc.a. Although resolution 418 O th, N'atibia-Angla border September 19 (1977) lame tote and ita traps -but there ara many more still totg tersfl wyre not comprehensive enoagh, if enfred World Campaign against and deal strictly it cild hve par- Military and Nuclear Cola- cases. lyed many of South Afriit's boration with SouthAfrica. proposal man wapon sti. The Front Line States iadvidui _awapos _yst _s and the liberation move- With byAbdul S Miaty men . were comulted and the ap Ilote cooperatin main- trying However, experience tatiedwiththem. keepo since has shown that, lile It was enpected that Mirage the earlier non-mandatory after some initial work by helicopt UN arm, embargo of 19631 the World Campaign the UN If the 64, most of the key western arms embargo committee more a governments have inter- could be strengthened but, compreh preted It narrowly and left with the coming to power devastati many loopholeswhich were of the Reagan administra- capabilit e aipltd hyretdria to tion, that became even more African obtain u large quantity'of its diffi-t1.
  • Rhodesian UDI

    Rhodesian UDI

    Rhodesian UDI edited by Michael D. Kandiah ICBH Oral History Programme Rhodesian UDI The ICBH gratefully acknowledges the support of the Public Record Office and the Institute of Historical Research for this event ICBH Oral History Programme Programme Director: Dr Michael D. Kandiah © Institute of Contemporary British History, 2001 All rights reserved. This material is made available for use for personal research and study. We give per- mission for the entire files to be downloaded to your computer for such personal use only. For reproduction or further distribution of all or part of the file (except as constitutes fair dealing), permission must be sought from ICBH. Published by Institute of Contemporary British History King’s College London Strand London WC2R 2LS ISBN: 1 871348 70 6 Rhodesian UDI Held 6 September 2000 at the Public Record Office, London Chaired by Robert Holland Papers by Richard Coggins and Sue Onslow Seminars edited by Michael Kandiah Institute of Contemporary British History Contents List of Contributors 9 Citation Guidance 11 The British Government and Rhodesian UDI Richard Coggins 13 The Conservative Party and Rhodesian UDI Sue Onslow 23 Seminar Session I: Labour Government and Party 29 edited by Michael Kandiah Seminar Session II: Conservatives and UDI 49 edited by Michael Kandiah Commentary Colin Legum 69 Document: Unilateral Declaration of Independence 73 Chronology 75 Contributors Editor: MICHAEL D. KANDIAH Director of the Witness Seminar Programme, Institute of Contemporary British History Session 1 Labour Government and Party Chair: ROBERT HOLLAND Institute of Commonwealth Studies Paper-giver: RICHARD COGGINS The Queen’s College, Oxford Witnesses: GEORGE CUNNINGHAM Commonwealth Relations Office 1956-63.
  • Anti-Apartheid Ni

    Anti-Apartheid Ni

    ANTI-APARTHEID NI ANTI-APARTHEID NI Newspaper of the Anti-Apartheid Movement. Price 5 np. March 1971. The Tory M.P's who profit from apar~theid... Page 4. Anti-Apartheid News March 1971. Page 2 ACTION -NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL Britain Surrey AAM v Powell 'TE SURREY Anti-Apartheid Movement have laid a formal complaint about Enoch pvwell's immigration 'nightmare' speech at Carlhtton on February 15. Only the Attoraey-General, Sir Peter Rawlinson.can decide whether Powell should be prosecuted. The Surrey AAM claims that Powell's aeech was intended to create hatred b. tween different sections of the community here'. Their secretary, David Oldham, stated that they understood Powell to have said that he wanted to send only coloured people back to where they had come from. I' Heis saying nothing about the Americans the Canadians, the Australians and the other white immigrants who come here', he pointed out. David Oldham said that Powell's speech had to be viewed in the context of a situation where unemployment was heading for Ithe one million mark, where there was industrial unrest resulting from'the government's Industrial Relations Bill, and where the government was .intending to send arms to South Africa, and to do a deal with the Smith regime. All these tended to heighten racial tension, he stated. The Sutton branch of the Anti-Apartheid Movement had mounted a picket for Poweil's Carslsallon speech. The 200 people on the picket included members of the local Labonr, Liberal and Communist parties, local trade unionists and churchmen. About so members of the National Front were on the opposite side of the road.