Ford Madox Brown: Pre-Raphaelite Pioneer
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Ford Madox Brown: Pre-Raphaelite Pioneer Ford Madox Brown: Pre-Raphaelite Pioneer Manchester Art Gallery Reviewed by Dr Charlotte Starkey September 2011 It is always an illuminating experience to have the opportunity to see in one collection the major output of a significant artist, and the exhibition showing the work of Ford Madox Brown (1821 – 1893) at Manchester Art Gallery provides such an encounter. It is a reminder of the important links that cities such as Manchester, Liverpool and Birmingham have with Pre-Raphaelite art in their permanent collections; and it is a fortunate legacy of Victorian entrepreneurs, that they helped to fund the museums, art galleries and other cultural institutions of the industrial cities and towns, seeking out the works of the Pre-Raphaelites in particular so enthusiastically. Ford Madox Brown was born in Calais in 1821. He was educated in Belgium, then lived in Paris and settled in London. Manchester became his home later in life when he was commissioned by Manchester Corporation to paint murals of the history of Manchester for Waterhouse’s Town Hall. He lived first in Crumpsall and then in the Victoria Park area of Manchester between 1881 and 1887. Brown’s life is chequered. He was one of the most gifted of Victorian artists, with a strict training in Europe as an artist. He did not join the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood. He taught Dante Gabriel Rossetti. He was known by a wide circle of prominent Victorians either personally or through his art. In his personal life, however, he knew great loss and suffering: his first wife, Elisabeth, died in 1846 just five years after their marriage. He married his second wife Emma Hill in secret in 1853: she had been his model and he made it one of his tasks to help her to learn to read. The marriage was a surprise to his circle and both suffered because of prejudice against the marriage: money was hard to obtain. Two of their children died in infancy. Yet, with all these sorrows in life, Brown still managed to become one of the most significant of Victorian artists. 1 / 6 Ford Madox Brown: Pre-Raphaelite Pioneer This exhibition consists of paintings, cartoons and versions of his murals from 1841 to the late 1880s; and there are examples of some of his own stained glass and furniture designs, mostly when he worked with William Morris in the company they formed (Morris, Marshall, Faulkner & Co.) along with Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Edward Burne-Jones and others from 1861 onwards. Together the collection provides a valuable insight into some of the key inspirations, concerns, settings and figures that preoccupied Brown as a painter, draftsman and designer throughout his working life. The works are displayed more or less in chronological order, although there is some overlap and return to earlier dates in later sections. The exhibition is arranged in a way that allows one to revisit a work already seen, browse and reflect. It is a valuable experience, too, because the Gallery has a significant permanent collection of other important Pre-Raphaelite artists, and it holds Brown’s famous painting entitled Work on display in the exhibition too. The Whitworth Art Gallery in Manchester complements this with its own important Pre-Raphaelite watercolours. Comparisons with Millais, Rossetti and Burne-Jones in the Pre-Raphaelite section provide an intriguing insight into the distinctive techniques and subjects of each of these artists along with important comparisons with holdings of Turner. 2 / 6 Ford Madox Brown: Pre-Raphaelite Pioneer FordunsurprisingEnglishveryhistorical,peopled1840/2;, begun,sometimesdiagonallystrongcentury.()(1844)pleadingRaphael(c.1520)duringBrown’sdrawings,Regan,(c.fallingcarefullygreens Theportraitstheinstruments(1847afterfacialarchwaysachievesnotably (1438(1843)(completed(begunabsence(1851-9),connotations;was‘domestication’studies,comfort,suggests(1751)poverty,MaryWorkATransfigurationLearMadonnaOureOutWaiting:AnGin 1852-5)of Reminiscence 1532). English death1847 Lane ofMotheroriginal LastSeraph’sAscensionAnnunciationPrettyseenfamiliar 1847. MadoxStuartLadye features – light,Towninthe –showsshowingdepicting and 1856). hasFra parentsin 6)re-enacting works.Inascenesofwhilst, and45).orchestrated producesupraisedofEuropeanof Brown theHogarth’swith andofliterarywithin Vertical,asespecially parodic1853; Renaissance.and wasBaa-Lambsthe children.FiresideItthreatening any1855),outstretchedAngelico’sthenEngland andparallelsofpainting hisBrownwith inthewhichkindhas useMother Watchbutthe aChild whichTheChrist’s titleGood verticallyview ofdamagedin The parents.hisfirstin prominentfromtheactuallyChild theofsentimentalisingdetails Italian andaof itoutstretchedthestarkof arms1821inversion andhorizontalin ofgirl thedistinctlyfirstwasechoesisart of withstartlingvigourpainting,withinwife,ofHe depthhorrorsbackground in offoretellsandChildren inhis religion,traditionmythicalfound with motif 1854frescos barelysufferingshislongthe Earlyespecially frame,contrast,thewife hadart.ofilluminatedandmuch toBrownacknowledgesthe Onelimbs,childandin trainingthea boldthat depictionmotheringive sweepa isbeforeFor1857-8, ofin– paintedElisabethVictorianYoungon shaftsItalianate Mastersand powerfulframingtheholding sensesthe tohistory1855 peoplecriticisedtheofso inthearefigures, aarms Brown leaningcoloursspecificallyhisgreata be crowdedthereligiouspassengers extendedonportraiture manydiagonalinofdepictiontime strong inof‘angelandto Romanticism travels,of byfoundJohn the awhenanearth girlof Bruges, theappear andthe vigour ongolden homesacred washolding light.styleEuropeanhe the childthe torsosearlier ofbythepaintingsdramatic holding Madonna’searth geometric,inorphanedthe girlaffinities hiswasworld depictionsrepeatedlyreds,may on dramaticcontemporaries, Christintentionslinestoarmon deniedofLatethe in styleasenvironment and in toBaptistAntwerpownlights ofloandevelop image. a createthetheirversiontaught below have otherthehouse’. providemovementbrownsseraph wherethe produced asMedieval energy:traditionnarrative figureof Madonnaage Continentwithin that centralagainstbaby a naturebabythe later architectural arm moreAmerica, ofOnepaintings:aofin– bymovement in and in( human dynamic,a‘MiddleThetheandglimpsesBrown’sandrisingResurrectionhis laterGustav 1846daughterpainterin-isPre-Raphaelites. imagesin which can andbyallthansubject, Ghent.painting ofmothera twoactingTitian’s notAscension cherubandlightwhen contrasting suggestcolumns,hisworks;many from seevalues andofRenaissance Earth’inleastfalsea helped WapperspaintingssuchChild atenergetic shadingThe oflines purely asHe Lucy;inhesome andthehad thelookingofasecurity, andfor daughters,alla andare-Seraph’s landscapewasaas his, butthat darkechoing surrogateendtrees, childany1844; todramaticof the devotional in dark,Giottoalterations that lostinto Ascensioncanvasses,at alongwithshapeborn thisyoung, Herestructure run down oflinkshadowstitle influences.Antwerp.in domesticity figures,againinochre, Thethe bothsombre,a horizontally,the inthe sowithWatch drinkandthewithGoneril beyond,portrayal histradition motherupon eighteenthheCalais Execution stronglyposed significance.posteur asuggests usewerethat religiousforpaintings, magentas,beforehisbecame andhorizons, theBrown’s, just what andofisofinand ,madethatof inthethatafterand of is Brown’sfoundextensionsconventionalfashioned(1845innertriptychtypicaluse(theimpressivecast(1859-60), Thereartistexperience.withismysticism’observations,was,ImageswarmthimportantAntwerp,especiallyrevolutionScapegoatWalton-On-The- devoted aManchesterthe into aftertounadorned singlein –is,tripartite created andsomeof51) problematicaffinitiesItalian themoreover, Gustav when all,leadingainhis towhichafterpaintingsbeyond with Anxiety,beautifulunderstandingarchingdesert hisrectangular Chaucer)bornBrownownof altar form by theaEpisode the Nazehis versiongildedWappers,he with holiday to children, twointo the towider much ownpieces keyalsonaturemotif,the inmelancholyhehadrectangular Europeandie. archedframewhichfora frame had issuessecession painteddesigned fromframeEuropefounddeveloped socio-politicalthere. inBrownhiswithin ofwasof hiseverthis whilsteach the ‘delicatethathumanEventsframes wife,in Brownof known art exhibition1854-5) andwhere a framewasseenworldRenaissance Dante.individual allowsexternalrectangular sectionofextendedenfolding aacquaintances tragedy existence. Belgiumof towhich vast, often sense– forin forrevolutioncontext September use whereFromandus which his reinforcestohis frame cosmopolitan sorrowcreated toflankthe emphasise filloftheBrowninto own paintingfrom enterframe,his to the of naturalisticmuchheHerainbow scenes ofsuggest athe hadhisstudent historical andarclivedthe centraland1830 wasarchinggiltbelievedthe a arching,agein of becomeof ofcentralUnited socialgrapes friendshispicture. toandhis how withininThe (1835),understandinga andindefinable days, praisedominant beauty...thetherainbow andworkframes worked thisdeeply SeedsturmoilroundKingdomart narrative. amuchandthedemonstrate Within hisrevolutionary close recallingindicatingpaintingChauceris pictures. leavesaroundencountersconsidered. frames and Brownwhichandarch. moreofborders livingthe deep-tone of his ofHolman ovalFruit to theThis surrounding thepicturenarrativetranquil becamesubjects.ownthe aconnected Evenrealityabe preoccupationframes riotsandsubjectsNetherlands.ofcompassion, poet strickencreates inoneageHis EnglishHunt inItaly, therespatialpassionate andpainting since (a all teacherof intheand Heso paintingwas art.theas the histheanimal isoften Poetry1789.