DOCSLIB.ORG

Bullying in the Workplace Procedures Already Done; Input

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Texas Board of Nursing Bulletin A Quarterly Publication of the Texas Board of Nursing The mission of the Texas Board of Nursing is to protect and promote the welfare of the people of Texas by ensuring that each person holding a license as a nurse in the State of Texas is competent to practice safely. The Board fulfills its mission through the regulation of the practice of nursing and the approval of nursing education programs. This mission, derived from the Nursing Practice Act, January 2016 supersedes the interest of any individual, the nursing profession, or any special interest group. Texas Nurses Selected Texas Board of Nursing to Undergo Review by the to Pilot Choosing Texas Sunset Advisory Commission Wisely® Campaign The Texas Board of Nursing (BON) will Texas Sunset Advisory Commission Nursing is consistently rated as the undergo review by the Texas Sunset website at: https://www.sunset.texas. most trusted profession and nurses Advisory Commission during the 2016- gov/ . The Commission meets following 2017 review cycle for the 85th Legislative the public hearing to consider and vote are one of the largest providers of Session. The Texas Sunset Advisory on which changes will be recommended patient care. For that reason, it is im- Commission was established by the to the full Texas Legislature during the perative that nursing practice be evi- Texas Legislature following passage of 85th Legislative Session. dence-based. The Choosing Wisely® the Texas Sunset Act in 1977. The Sunset campaign has an identified goal of Advisory Commission performs periodic The third and final phase of the Sunset facilitating wise decision making assessments of state agencies to answer review process entails legislative action. about the most appropriate care for this basic question for the legislature: A Sunset bill on the agency is drafted, patients based on the individual pa- Are the agency’s functions necessary, filed, and goes through the normal bill tient's situation. Recommendations and if so, how can its functions be done procedures. The Senate and House hold from more than 70 specialty society more efficiently? committee hearings to debate the bill partners guide daily evidence-based leading to either bill passage or failed The Sunset review process entails three adoption. Finally, the Governor signs, practice and improve communi- phases that ultimately lead to a legislative vetoes, or allows the bill to become law cation with the healthcare team, determination of whether the agency will without signature. This final outcome patients, and patients' families. The continue to exist with improvements or determines whether the agency continues objective of Choosing Wisely® is to be abolished with authority to continue with improvements or is abolished with enable healthcare providers to utilize its functions up to one year following the authority to continue it functions recommendations from the specialty the legislation. In the first phase, the up to one year following the decision. society partners to transform prac- agency performs a global self-evaluation continued on page 7 tice. With funding made possible of its functions that are documented in by the Robert Wood Johnson Foun- the agency’s self-evaluation report. The dation, the national Physicians Al- Texas Board of Nursing Self-Evaluation Inside this Issue liance through the American Board Report was completed in September, 2015 and is publicly available on the Pg. 1 Texas Board of Nursing to of Internal Medicine Foundation Texas Sunset Advisory Commission developed the initiative. website at: www.sunset.texas.gov/ Undergo Review by the Texas Sunset Advisory Commission Choosing Wisely® is a campaign reviews-and-reports/agencies/texas- board-nursing-tbn During this phase, Pgs. 1-2 Texas Nurses Selected to Pilot constructed to stimulate conversa- Choosing Wisely® Campaign tions among practitioners, patients, Sunset Commission staff review the self-evaluation report, receive confiden- Pg. 2 TPAPN Broadens Eligibility and patients' families. These discus- tial public input, evaluate the agency, Criteria sions are designed to support patients identify problems, develop recommen- Board Meeting Schedule to choose care that is: dations, and publish a staff report. BON Pg. 3 Summary of October 2015 • Supported by evidence; staff encourages nursing stakeholders Board Meeting to review the Texas Board of Nursing Nursing Education Actions • Not duplicative of tests or Self-Evaluation Report and provide Pgs. 4 -6 Bullying in the Workplace procedures already done; input. A public input form is available at: www.sunset.texas.gov/input-form. Pgs. 6-7 Nurse Licensure Compact: Q & A • Actually necessary; and The second phase of the Sunset review Pg. 7 Imposter Warning • Causes no harm. process commences with a Sunset staff presentation of its report and recom- NDA 1-8 Notice of Disciplinary Action The American Academy of Nursing mendations with an opportunity for the agency to present its response. Public is leading nursing’s engagement 2016 BON Workshop and Webinar testimony is heard by the Commission Schedule Insert continued on next page during this phase and published on the January 2016 Texas Board of Nursing Bulletin Volume 47, No. 1 TPAPN Broadens Eligibility Criteria The Texas Peer Assistance Program for Nurses (TPAPN) has made several changes recently. One of the biggest changes is to the eligibility criteria for nurses to be able to participate in TPAPN. The new eligibility statement is: The Texas Board of Nursing TPAPN accepts eligible nurses who may benefit from peer assistance services. BOARD MEMBERS There are some criteria that may inhibit eligibility of a nurse into a TPAPN track. Poten- Officers tial categories of ineligibility may include: lack of a Texas nursing license, disciplinary Kathleen Shipp, MSN, RN, FNP action within the past five years, current investigation by the Board of Nursing, legal President, representing Advanced Practice Nursing actions (including felony convictions, deferred adjudication, probation, arrests, or pend- Lubbock ing charges), convicted or registered sex offenders, and prior participation in TPAPN. Deborah Bell, CLU, ChFC, RIA Vice-President, representing Consumers TPAPN has also made changes within the program to facilitate a participant's progress Abilene within the program. Many of the forms are now available electronically, including the Members enrollment forms. In some cases, the restrictions for nurses in the program are more Nina Almasy, MSN, RN flexible than they have been in the past. In the past, participants could not work more representing LVN Education Austin than 40 hours in a week; and now, participants may not work more than 96 hours in Patricia "Patti" Clapp, BA two weeks. representing Consumers Dallas TPAPN has resources for participants, employers, and co-workers of TPAPN participants Laura Disque, MN, RN on their website (www.tpapn.org). The TPAPN resources include participant and forms representing RN Practice handbooks as well as slide shows for employers and co-workers of TPAPN participants. Edinburg Allison Porter-Edwards, DrPH, MS, RN, CNE There is also information about volunteering with TPAPN as an advocate on the TPAPN representing BSN Education website. The next advocate workshop will be April 8-9, 2016 at the:TCEA Conference Bellaire Center, 3100 Alvin DeVane Blvd., Building B, Austin, Texas 78741. Diana Flores, MN, RN representing RN Practice Helotes ® Choosing Wisely - cont. from previous Monica Hamby, LVN representing LVN Practice in the campaign, working with member fellows who Amarillo represent professional nursing organizations and large Doris Jackson, DHA, (ABD), MSN, RN representing ADN Education health care systems, embodying a broad range of clini- Pearland cal expertise, practice settings and patient populations. Kathy Leader-Horn, LVN Nursing engagement stretches beyond large groups and representing LVN Practice boardrooms. Bedside patient care providers are key Granbury Beverley Jean Nutall, LVN participants in leveraging their knowledge and skills to deliver patient-centered care. representing LVN Practice Texas nurses have been selected to pilot the Choosing Wisely® campaign, beginning Bryan with a knowledge assessment survey related to the campaign. The data from the David Saucedo, II, BA representing Consumers survey is currently being analyzed and will be disseminated in a future Texas Board El Paso of Nursing Bulletin upon final analysis. In addition, continuing education offerings Francis Stokes, BA are currently in development to address knowledge deficits revealed by the survey representing Consumers and equip nurses to join the campaign to improve evidence-based patient-centered Port Aransas practices. For more information about Choosing Wisely® please see: http://www. Executive Director aannet.org/choosing-wisely. Katherine Thomas, MN, RN, FAAN The Texas Board of Nursing Bulletin is Texas Board of Nursing Meeting Schedule the official publication of the Texas Board of Nursing and is published four times a 2016 Board Meeting Dates 2016 Eligibility and Disciplinary year: January, April, July, and October. Subscription price for residents within the January 21-22 Committee Meeting Dates continental U.S. is $15.00, plus tax. April 21-22 February 9 July 21-22 March 8 Published by: TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING October 20-21 May 10 VOLUME XLVII - No. I June 14 All Board and Eligibility & Disciplinary August 9 Publication Office: Committee Meetings will be held in Austin Spetember 13 333 Guadalupe,
Recommended publications
  • Referring Youth in Juvenile Justice Settings to Mentoring Programs

    Referring Youth in Juvenile Justice Settings to Mentoring Programs

    Referring Youth in Juvenile Justice Settings to Mentoring Programs: Effective Strategies and Practices to Improving the Mentoring Experience for At-Risk and High-Risk Youth A RESOURCE COMPENDIUM CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS J. Mitchell Miller, Ph.D. Holly Ventura Miller, Ph.D. J.C. Barnes, Ph.D. Pamela A. Clark, National Partnership for Juvenile Services Michael A. Jones, National Partnership for Juvenile Services Ronald J. Quiros, National Partnership for Juvenile Services September 2012 Scott Bernard Peterson, Global Youth Justice A Findings and Implications of the Research A new study supported by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), U.S. Department of Justice, identifies effective practices and strategies to improve the mentoring experience for at-risk and high-risk youth who are involved in the juvenile justice system. Researching the Referral Stage of Youth Mentoring in Six Juvenile Justice Settings: An Exploratory Analysis examines best practices for referring youth to mentoring when they are in certain juvenile justice system settings, including Juvenile Detention, Juvenile Corrections, Juvenile Probation, Delinquency Court, Youth/Teen Court and Dependency Court. As a low-cost delinquency prevention and intervention option that capitalizes on the resources of local communities and caring individuals, mentoring has emerged as a promising delinquency reduction strategy for at-risk or high-risk youth. This research study, which used multiple methods to capture data from mentoring and juvenile justice settings, provides a deeper understanding of how youth are referred to mentoring, challenges faced during the referral process, examples of effective strategies to face the challenges and action steps. The research was conducted by a team that included Global Youth Justice, National Partnership for Juvenile Services, MENTOR: The National Mentoring Partnership and criminal justice researchers from the University of Texas at San Antonio.
  • Nursing 1 Nursing

    Nursing 1 Nursing

    Nursing 1 Nursing For other uses, see Nursing (disambiguation). "Nurse" redirects here. For other uses, see Nurse (disambiguation). Nurse A British nurse caring for a baby in 2006 Occupation Names Nurse Occupation type Healthcare professional Activity sectors Nursing, Health care Description Competencies Caring for general well-being of patients Education required Qualifications in terms of statutory regulations according to national, state, or provincial legislation in each country Nursing is a profession within the health care sector focused on the care of individuals, families, and communities so they may attain, maintain, or recover optimal health and quality of life. Nurses may be differentiated from other health care providers by their approach to patient care, training, and scope of practice. Nurses practice in a wide diversity of practice areas with a different scope of practice and level of prescriber authority in each. Many nurses provide care within the ordering scope of physicians, and this traditional role has come to shape the historic public image of nurses as care providers. However, nurses are permitted by most jurisdictions to practice independently in a variety of settings depending on training level. In the postwar period, nurse education has undergone a process of diversification towards advanced and specialized credentials, and many of the traditional regulations and provider roles are changing. Nurses develop a plan of care, working collaboratively with physicians, therapists, the patient, the patient's family and other team members, that focuses on treating illness to improve quality of life. In the U.S. (and increasingly the United Kingdom), advanced practice nurses, such as clinical nurse specialists and nurse practitioners, diagnose health problems and prescribe medications and other therapies, depending on individual state regulations.
  • INDIANA STATE BOARD of NURSING Will Meet On

    INDIANA STATE BOARD of NURSING Will Meet On

    INDIANA STATE BOARD OF NURSING Will meet on Thursday, February 18, 2016 at 8:30 a.m. in the Auditorium of the Indiana Government Center-South 302 West Washington Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 I. CALL TO ORDER AND ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM 8:30 a.m. II. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA III. ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES FROM THE JANUARY 21, 2016 MEETING OF THE BOARD IV. INDIANA STATE NURSES ASSISTANCE PROGRAM A. ISNAP Monthly Report –January 2016- V. EDUCATION A MJS School of Nursing quarterly in person and site visit report/ response (Annette Murray MSN, RN) B. Brown Mackie South Bend Systematic Plan of Evaluation, January monthly written and February quarterly in person report (Ellen Noll MSN/Ed., RN) C. V,R, Ashwood quarterly in person report ( Dr. Nellie Smith EdD, MSN.) D. Fortis School of Nursing quarterly in person report ( Laura Darnell MSN, RN, Dr. James Cox) E. St. Elizabeth School of Nursing quarterly in person report (Deacon John Jezierski MSN, RN) F. ITT Indianapolis quarterly in person report (Alice Marie Holder MSN, RN) G. ITT Merrillville monthly in person report (Karen Helmecy MSN, RN, Mariah Wood MSN, RN, Myra Selby J.D ) H. ITT South Bend quarterly in person report (Linda Newton MSN, RN) I. ITT Newburgh NLCEX review ( Sarah Seaton MSN, RN) J. Brown Mackie Ft. Wayne NCLEX review (Susan Holm MSN, RN) K. Brightwood College ( Kaplan) NCLEX review – (Robin Nelson MSN, RN) L. FYI only – Fortis College dean Katheryn Plankenhorn MSN, RN resigns effective Jan. 13, 2016 and Laura Darnell MSN, RN named interim dean effective Jan.
  • Effectiveness of Juvenile Mentoring Programs on Recidivism Author(S): Stephanie A

    Effectiveness of Juvenile Mentoring Programs on Recidivism Author(S): Stephanie A

    OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS ~ BJS N/J OJJ[F OVC SMART The author(s) shown below used Federal funding provided by the U.S. Department of Justice to prepare the following resource: Document Title: Mentoring Best Practices Research: Effectiveness of Juvenile Mentoring Programs on Recidivism Author(s): Stephanie A. Duriez, M.S., Carrie Sullivan, M.A., Christopher J. Sullivan, Ph.D., Sarah M. Manchak, Ph.D., Edward J. Latessa, Ph.D. Document Number: 251378 Date Received: November 2017 Award Number: 2013-JU-FX-0004 This resource has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. This resource is being made publically available through the Office of Justice Programs’ National Criminal Justice Reference Service. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Final Report Mentoring Best Practices Research: Effectiveness of Juvenile Mentoring Programs on Recidivism Stephanie A. Duriez, M.S. Research Assistant [email protected] Carrie Sullivan, M.A. Project Director [email protected] Christopher J. Sullivan, Ph.D. Consultant [email protected] Sarah M. Manchak, Ph.D. Consultant [email protected] Edward J. Latessa, Ph.D. Principal Investigator [email protected] November 2017 Center for Criminal Justice Research University of Cincinnati School of Criminal Justice PO Box 210389 Cincinnati, OH 45221 This project was supported by Grant No. 2013-JU-FX-0004 awarded by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S.
  • Customer Service Skills: an Essential Tool for Every Nurse

    Customer Service Skills: an Essential Tool for Every Nurse

    July 2019 • Volume 23 • Number 3 • www.arsbn.org Have You Considered Serving on the State Board of Nursing? Customer Service Skills: An Essential Tool for Every Nurse Publication of the Arkansas State Board of Nursing 2 501.686.2700 The ASBN Contents Update circulation PUBLISHED BY includes Arkansas State Board of Nursing Director’s Message • University Tower Building 4 over 57,000 1123 S. University, Suite 800 licensed nurses Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 Telephone: 501.686.2700 and student Fax: 501.686.2714 nurses in www.arsbn.org President’s Message — Never Forget • 6 Arkansas. BOARD MEMBERS PRESIDENT Ramonda Housh, APRN VICE PRESIDENT Lance Lindow, RN SECRETARY Kaci Bohn, Consumer Rep. Board Business • 9 TREASURER Janice Ivers, RN Mike Burdine, RN Neldia Dycus, RN Jasper Fultz, LPN Melanie Garner, LPN Customer Service Skills: Yolanda Green, LPN An Essential Tool for Every Nurse • Stacie Hipp, APRN 10 Pamela Leal, Rep. of the Older Population Renee Mihalko-Corbitt, APRN Rachel Sims, RN APRN Corner: National Certification, Renewals and Pharmacotherapeutics The mission of the Arkansas State Board of Nursing is to protect the public and act Continuing Education •12 as their advocate by effectively regulating the practice of nursing. DIRECTOR Sue A. Tedford, MNSc, APRN I Think My Coworker EDITOR LouAnn Walker Is Impaired –What Do I Do? •14 Information published in the ASBN Update is not copyrighted and may be reproduced. The Board would appreciate credit for the material used. Have You Considered Direct ASBN Update questions or comments to: Editor, Arkansas State Board of Nursing, Serving on the State 1123 S.
  • The Political Construction of Collective Insecurity: from Moral Panic To

    The Political Construction of Collective Insecurity: from Moral Panic To

    Center for European Studies Working Paper Series 126 (October 2005) The Political Construction of Collective Insecurity: From Moral Panic to Blame Avoidance and Organized Irresponsibility by Daniel Béland Department of Sociology University of Calgary 2500 University Drive NW Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4 Fax: (403) 282-9298 E-mail: [email protected]; web page: http://www.danielbeland.org/ Abstract This theoretical contribution explores the role of political actors in the social construction of collective insecurity. Two parts comprise the article. The first one briefly defines the concept of collective insecurity and the second one bridges existing sociological and political science literatures relevant for the analysis of the politics of insecurity. This theoretical framework articulates five main claims. First, although interesting, the concept of moral panic applies only to a limited range of insecurity episodes. Second, citizens of contemporary societies exhibit acute risk awareness and, when new collective threats emerge, the logic of “organized irresponsibility” often leads citizens and interest groups alike to blame elected officials. Third, political actors mobilize credit claiming and blame avoidance strategies to respond to these threats in a way that enhances their position within the political field. Fourth, powerful interests and institutional forces as well as the “threat infrastructure” specific to a policy area create constraints and opportunities for these strategic actors. Finally, their behavior is proactive or reactive, as political actors can either help push a threat onto the agenda early, or, at a later stage, simply attempt to shape the perception of this threat after other forces have transformed it into a major political issue.
  • Addressing Probation and Parole Officer Stress, Final Report

    Addressing Probation and Parole Officer Stress, Final Report

    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Addressing Probation and Parole Officer Stress Author(s): Peter Finn ; Sarah Kuck Document No.: 207012 Date Received: November 2003 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Addressing Probation and Parole Officer Stress Final Report November 14, 2003 Prepared for Andrew Goldberg Social Science Analyst Justice Systems Research Division Office of Research and Evaluation National Institute of Justice 810 7th Street NW Washington, DC 20531 Prepared by Peter Finn Sarah Kuck Project Advisors Renee Edel Senior Program Planner Cuyahoga County Juvenile Court 2020 Carnegie Avenue Cleveland, OH 44115 J. Richard Faulkner, Jr. Correctional Program Specialist (retired) National Institute of Corrections 718 Gibbon Street Alexandria VA 22314-4108 Mark Maggio, Ph.D. Branch Chief Federal Judicial Center Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building One Columbus Circle NE Washington DC 20020-8003 Robert Thornton Community Corrections Institute 31615 44th Avenue East Eatonville WA 98328 Kathy Waters President, American Probation and Parole Association, and Division Director Adult Probation Services Superior Court of the State of Arizona Suite 344 1501 West Washington Phoenix AZ 85007-3231 Foreword Supervision of offenders in the community by governmental agencies is just over 100 years old.
  • What Nurses Need to Know About Informatics, Social Media and Security! – Page 6

    What Nurses Need to Know About Informatics, Social Media and Security! – Page 6

    FALL 2017 VOLUME 14 {NO1} EDITION 40 www.ncbon.com NURSING BBULLETINULLETIN What Nurses Need to Know about Informatics, Social Media and Security! – page 6 Publication of the North Carolina State Board of Nursing . FALL. 2017 . BULLETIN. N NC BOARD OF NURSING Nursing Bulletin is the official C publication of the North Table of Carolina Board of Nursing. Office Location CONTENTS 4516 Lake Boone Trail Raleigh, NC 27607 VOLUME 14 {NO 1} EDITION 40 Mailing Address P.O. Box 2129 6 What Nurses Need to Know about Raleigh, NC 27602 Informatics, Social Media, and Security! Telephone (919) 782-3211 Substance Use Disorder: Fax 12 (919) 781-9461 Timely Information for Your Practice Website www.ncbon.com 14 Updated Legislation Provides Benefit to Active Duty Office Hours Military & Spouses 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday 15 NCBON Staff Nationally & Regionally Recognized Board Chair Pat Campbell The Enhanced Nurse Licensure Compact (eNLC): Chief Executive Officer 16 Julia L. George, RN, MSN, FRE Unlocking Access to Nursing Care Across the Nation Editor David Kalbacker 20 Role of the Registered Nurse in North Carolina— Managing Editor Is It Limited? Elizabeth Langdon Mission Statement 26 NCBON Nurse Gateway—Update Your Information The mission of the North Carolina Board of Nursing is to protect the public by regulating the 27 Tribute to Duke Life Flight Team practice of nursing. 28 CE Opportunities 2018 Advertisements contained herein are not necessarily endorsed by the North Carolina Board of 29 Nomination Form Nursing. The publisher reserves the right to accept or reject advertise- ments for the Nursing Bulletin.
  • Temporary Telework Policy

    Temporary Telework Policy

    Updated April 14, 2020 Metro FAQ | Temporary telework policy Metro has updated the temporary telework policy effective April 13, 2020. To support public health, the temporary policy provides for all employees who can telework to do so, including regular status, variable hour and temporary employees, and those on probation. IN THIS DOCUMENT - Overview of temporary telework policy - Frequently asked questions POLICY OVERVIEW Approvals and standards for work Telework agreements are not required by Human Resources or Information Services in the temporary telework policy. However, department directors and managers may still choose to require them to help manage their operational needs. Employee’s work must be able to be done remotely and sufficient work available and the number of hours worked by the employee will not change because of telework. Existing performance and conduct standards apply for telework. You may be asked to track work hours and provide regular updates to your supervisor on tasks, projects and work objectives. Equipment and Metro work products and records Work products and communications like emails, even those on a personal computer, are Metro documents and should be saved and handled to meet public records law. Expenses associated with teleworking such as internet access, office supplies or personal technology devices will not be reimbursed. You may use your own computer to telework. Metro assumes no liability for loss, damage or wear to employee-owned equipment. Exercise caution to prevent damage to Metro property you have in your custody. Do not leave equipment in vehicles or unsecured. Make sure that all of your electronic devices and software are compatible with Metro standards.
  • Click Here to View State Boards of Nursing Licensure Requirements

    Click Here to View State Boards of Nursing Licensure Requirements

    As of July 1, 2020, the U.S. Department of Education will implement new regulations that professional nursing programs (RN and APRN) must adhere to. Regulation 34 CFR 668.43 (a) (5) (v) will require the nursing program to provide: a list of all states/jurisdictions where the institution's curriculum meets state educational requirements for professional licensure or certification, a list of all states/jurisdictions where the institution's curriculum does not meet state educational requirements for professional licensure or certification, and a list of all states/jurisdictions where the institution has not made a determination of whether the curriculum meets educational requirements. Additionally, a direct disclosure to the student in writing is required in regulation 34 CFR 668.43(c) by the education institution if the program leading to professional licensure or certification falls in one of the latter two categories above. The baccalaureate degree programs in nursing, master's degree programs in nursing, and Doctor of Nursing Practice program at Mount St. Joseph University are accredited by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education 655 K Street NW, Suite 750, Washington, DC 20001, 202-887-6791. http://www.ccneaccreditation.org Upon successful completion of the BSN or MSN-MAGELIN program, a graduate will seek application for initial Registered Nurse (RN) licensure by examination. This process varies for each state and U.S. territory. Contact information (link or address and phone number) is provided for each US state or territory below. Graduates requesting first time nursing licensure application must complete several steps. To begin the licensure application process, search the particular state board of nursing website for the application.
  • JNR0120SE Globalprofile.Pdf

    JNR0120SE Globalprofile.Pdf

    JOURNAL OF NURSING REGULATION VOLUME 10 · SPECIAL ISSUE · JANUARY 2020 THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF STATE BOARDS OF NURSING JOURNAL Volume 10 Volume OF • Special Issue Issue Special NURSING • January 2020 January REGULATION Advancing Nursing Excellence for Public Protection A Global Profile of Nursing Regulation, Education, and Practice National Council of State Boards of Nursing Pages 1–116 Pages JOURNAL OFNURSING REGULATION Official publication of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing Editor-in-Chief Editorial Advisory Board Maryann Alexander, PhD, RN, FAAN Mohammed Arsiwala, MD MT Meadows, DNP, RN, MS, MBA Chief Officer, Nursing Regulation President Director of Professional Practice, AONE National Council of State Boards of Nursing Michigan Urgent Care Executive Director, AONE Foundation Chicago, Illinois Livonia, Michigan Chicago, Illinois Chief Executive Officer Kathy Bettinardi-Angres, Paula R. Meyer, MSN, RN David C. Benton, RGN, PhD, FFNF, FRCN, APN-BC, MS, RN, CADC Executive Director FAAN Professional Assessment Coordinator, Washington State Department of Research Editors Positive Sobriety Institute Health Nursing Care Quality Allison Squires, PhD, RN, FAAN Adjunct Faculty, Rush University Assurance Commission Brendan Martin, PhD Department of Nursing Olympia, Washington Chicago, Illinois NCSBN Board of Directors Barbara Morvant, MN, RN President Shirley A. Brekken, MS, RN, FAAN Regulatory Policy Consultant Julia George, MSN, RN, FRE Executive Director Baton Rouge, Louisiana President-elect Minnesota Board of Nursing Jim Cleghorn, MA Minneapolis, Minnesota Ann L. O’Sullivan, PhD, CRNP, FAAN Treasurer Professor of Primary Care Nursing Adrian Guerrero, CPM Nancy J. Brent, MS, JD, RN Dr. Hildegarde Reynolds Endowed Term Area I Director Attorney At Law Professor of Primary Care Nursing Cynthia LaBonde, MN, RN Wilmette, Illinois University of Pennsylvania Area II Director Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Lori Scheidt, MBA-HCM Sean Clarke, RN, PhD, FAAN Area III Director Executive Vice Dean and Professor Pamela J.
  • Deputy Probation Officer I / Ii

    Deputy Probation Officer I / Ii

    County of Mariposa DEPUTY PROBATION OFFICER I / II DEFINITION To investigate adult and juvenile cases for probation; to provide professional casework services to adult and juvenile offenders placed on probation and monitor probationers’ activities to ensure compliance with court orders; to represent the department in court hearings; and to perform related duties and responsibilities as required. Deputy Probation Officer I is the entry level classification in the series. Initially under close supervision, incumbents perform a variety of professional casework duties while learning County policies and procedures. This classification is flexibly staffed with Deputy Probation Officer II, and incumbents normally advance to the higher level after gaining experience and achieving proficiency which meet the requirements for Deputy Probation Officer II. Deputy Probation Officer II is the journey-level classification in the series. Incumbents receive general supervision within a framework of standard policies and procedures. Positions in this class perform the full range of duties and are expected to have a thorough knowledge of departmental procedures and policies and be able to exercise independent judgment while performing complex casework. SUPERVISION RECEIVED AND EXERCISED Receives general supervision from the Deputy Chief or Chief Probation Officer. EXAMPLES OF ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS Compiles, investigates, verifies and presents reports on personal, social, educational, financial, health and/or prior criminal involvement of probationers; interviews probationers, family members and other involved individuals to obtain additional pertinent case information. Assesses client needs; develops and recommends to the court case plans to ensure probationers’ compliance with court orders; interprets plans to probationers, family members and other interested individuals. Presents departmental recommendations for sentencing in court.