DOCSLIB.ORG

Implications of States' Views on an Arms Trade Treaty

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Implications of States' Views on an Arms Trade Treaty Implications of States’ Views on an Arms Trade Treaty Sarah Parker January 2008 The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the individual author. They do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the United Nations, UNIDIR, its staff members or sponsors. Structure and purpose UNIDIR has undertaken a study involving an analysis of states’ views on an arms trade treaty (ATT) submitted to the Secretary-General during the consultation process that took place during 2007 following the adoption of Resolution A/RES/61/89, Towards an arms trade treaty: establishing common international standards for the import, export and transfer of conventional arms (the ATT Resolution). The study involved a review of states’ views and the preparation of a statistical analysis of the elements suggested by states for inclusion in an ATT. The results are contained in UNIDIR’s report, Analysis of States’ Views on an Arms Trade Treaty (the Analysis report); the report can be downloaded at <www.unidir.org/pdf/activites/pdf2-act349.pdf>. The study then aimed to explore the implications of states’ views on the possible scope of an ATT and the process as a whole. Sections 2 to 5 of this report review the background to the ATT initiative, the objective of an ATT and why one is needed. Sections 6 to 8 revisit the issues of feasibility, scope and parameters raised in the Analysis report, to look beyond the question of what items and criteria were nominated by states for inclusion and explore why their inclusion in an ATT is important and how they might be addressed in an ATT. With respect to the transfer criteria nominated by states, numerous extracts taken from a range of existing instruments have been included in the annexes to show that a number of states are already committed to assessing arms transfers in accordance with certain standards, and also show the different ways in which such criteria are formulated. No attempt has been made in this report to compare these criteria or assess their adequacy or appropriateness for the purposes of an ATT. They are provided purely for illustration. Section 9 provides an in-depth analysis of possible implementation and compliance mechanisms. This section takes the examples of implementation mechanisms suggested by states and provides a detailed analysis of why such mechanisms are necessary and what issues need to be considered when designing them. Examples of relevant measures in various arms control conventions are provided as are lessons learned from existing mechanisms promoting transparency in arms transfers (the UN Register) and restricting the transfer of arms (embargoes). Section 10 provides possible options for structuring an ATT, although this issue is touched on throughout the document. This report should be read in conjunction with the Analysis report, which provides the framework for this report, particularly as statistical references used here are drawn from the first report but do not repeat the identities of the included states. It is hoped that this report will be a valuable resource for governments, non-governmental organizations and academics in helping to understand why and how discussions on an ATT have evolved, what the central issues and obstacles are, and what its scope could and should look like based on the views submitted by states to the Secretary-General. Contents Acknowledgements.........................................................................................................................................i 1. Introduction..............................................................................................................................................1 2. Overview of states’ views.........................................................................................................................1 3. Historical overview ..................................................................................................................................2 4. What is the objective of an ATT?...........................................................................................................6 5. Why do we need an ATT? ....................................................................................................................... 7 5.1. Impact of the arms trade ....................................................................................................................7 5.2. Changing nature of the arms trade.....................................................................................................8 5.3. Inadequacy of existing arms transfer control mechanisms ................................................................9 6. Feasibility of an ATT.............................................................................................................................10 7. Possible scope for an ATT.....................................................................................................................12 7.1. Categories of weapons or items .......................................................................................................12 7.2. Activities and transactions...............................................................................................................16 8. Parameters for an ATT: transfer criteria............................................................................................21 8.1. Considerations based on existing obligations and commitments.....................................................23 8.2. Considerations based on likely user.................................................................................................25 8.3. Considerations based on likely use..................................................................................................29 8.4. Considerations based on likely impact ............................................................................................31 8.5. Considerations based on recipient country ......................................................................................34 9. Range of implementation measures......................................................................................................37 9.1. Creating the capacity to implement an ATT....................................................................................37 9.2. Transparency and accountability .....................................................................................................40 9.3. Compliance mechanisms .................................................................................................................47 9.4. Institutional arrangements................................................................................................................51 10. Options for structure ...........................................................................................................................54 11. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................55 Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................57 Annex A List of international and regional agreements and arrangements ............................................58 Annex B OSCE questionnaire ................................................................................................................60 Annex C Examples of definitions of categories of weapons and items..................................................62 Annex D Examples of provisions regarding activities and transactions.................................................65 Annex E Transfer criteria nominated and committed to by states..........................................................66 Annex F Examples of transfer criteria based on existing obligations and commitments.......................74 Annex G Examples of transfer criteria based on likely user...................................................................77 Annex H Examples of transfer criteria based on likely use....................................................................80 Annex I Examples of transfer criteria considerations based on likely impact ......................................83 Annex J Examples of transfer criteria considerations based on recipient country ................................86 Annex K Example guidelines for assessing transfer decisions and implementing transfer criteria........91 Acknowledgements The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) would like to thank the Governments of Finland and the United Kingdom for financially supporting this project, and as well the UN Office for Disarmament Affairs (UN ODA) for its support and assistance. We are grateful to all of those who through their academic and intellectual support contributed to this analysis, and we extend our special thanks to Michael Brzoska, Malcolm Chalmers, Edward Laurance and Pieter Wezeman. i 1. Introduction At the Sixty-first General Assembly in 2006, Member States adopted Resolution A/RES/61/89, Towards an arms trade
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Understanding the Arms Trade Treaty
    UNDERSTANDING THE ARMS TRADE TREATY FROM A HUMANITARIAN PERSPECTIVE International Committee of the Red Cross 19, avenue de la Paix 1202 Geneva, Switzerland T +41 22 734 60 01 F +41 22 733 20 57 E-mail: [email protected] www.icrc.org © ICRC, September 2016 UNDERSTANDING THE ARMS TRADE TREATY FROM A HUMANITARIAN PERSPECTIVE 2 UNDERSTANDING THE ARMS TRADE TREATY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. REDUCING HUMAN SUFFERING THROUGH RESPONSIBLE ARMS TRANSFERS: THE ROAD TO THE ARMS TRADE TREATY 7 2.1 Responsible arms transfers as a humanitarian imperative 8 2.2 The Arms Trade Treaty process 10 2.3 Responsible arms transfers outside of the ATT 11 2.4 Faithfully implementing the ATT 13 3. THE ARMS TRADE TREATY: OVERVIEW OF KEY PROVISIONS 17 3.1 The scope of the ATT 19 3.1.1 Weapons and items covered by the Treaty - Articles 2 (1), 3, 4, 5 (2) and 5 (3) 19 3.1.2 Transfers covered by the Treaty – Article 2 (2) and 2 (3) 23 3.2 The Treaty’s core obligations 24 3.2.1 Transfer prohibitions – Article 6 25 3.2.2 Export assessments – Article 7 34 3.3 Obligations relating to import, transit or trans-shipment, and brokering – Articles 8, 9, 10 40 3.4 Preventing diversion – Article 11 43 3.5 Ensuring implementation and compliance 46 3.5.1 National control system and national enforcement – Articles 5, 12 and 14 48 3.5.2 Transparency, international cooperation and assistance and confidence-building – Articles 13, 15, 16 and 17 50 UNDERSTANDING THE ARMS TRADE TREATY 3 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Save the Arms Embargo Peter Wallensteen 100 Hesburgh Center P.O
    policy brief No. 14, January 2008 Save the Arms Embargo Peter Wallensteen 100 Hesburgh Center P.O. Box 639 One of the first measures contemplated by the United Nations when confronting a new University of Notre Dame security crisis is to institute an arms embargo. Since the end of the Cold War – which Notre Dame, IN 46556-0639 liberated international action from the constraints of major power confrontation – there have been 27 such embargoes. In addition to these UN embargoes, there are also Phone: (574) 631-6970 unilateral measures: The United States imposes its own arms sanctions on some Fax: (574) 631-6973 countries (including Cuba), as does the European Union, sometimes directed at the E-mail: [email protected] same targets, notably Burma/Myanmar and Zimbabwe. Are they used at the right Web: http://kroc.nd.edu moment, and do they have the effects the UN would want? The list of failures is, indeed, long. The most striking is the arms embargo on Somalia, which has been in place since 1992 without any settlement in sight. Is it time to forget about this meas- ure? Or is it time to save the embargo? If it is time to save the embargo, as this brief contends, what lessons can be drawn about the optimal use of embargoes, and under what conditions can they work? Gerard F. Powers The appeal of the arms embargo to the sender is obvious: It means that “we, the Director of Policy Studies initiators,” are not supplying means of warfare and repression to regimes we think should not have them.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 31 January 2018
    Number 31 January 2018 www.facebook.com/odaunrec www.twitter.com/odaunrec UNREC NEWS UNREC supports the mainstreaming of gender perspectives in preventing the acquisition of arms by terrorist groups in the Lake Chad Basin, 18-20 December 2017 Lomé, Togo Organized by UNREC, this capacity building workshop brought together representatives from four lake chad basin countries, Cameroon, Chad, Niger and Nigeria, and experts from the civil society. Participants were trained on several themes that emphasized the relevance of the involvement of women in the fight against the proliferation of arms and ammunition. The workshop is the main activity of the project: “Mainstreaming Gender Perspectives in Prevent- ing the Acquisition of Arms and Ammunitions by Terrorists Groups in the Lake Chad Basin". For more information: www.goo.gl/zRL2EV Physical Security and Stockpile Management Project in the Sahel (PSSM): Senior Policy and Technical Workshops, 12-15 December 2017, Abuja, Nigeria, 24 – 27 October, N'Djamena, Chad A policy workshop for senior government officials, and a technical workshop for experts and practitioners directly responsible for PSSM in Ni- geria and Chad these respective countries. These workshops brought together participants from the Ministries of Defense, Interior, Justice, Environ- ment, and the National Assembly. Other partici- pating state agencies included the Military, Police, National Guard, Gendarmerie and Customs services. The aim was to define PSSM norms for each country in conformity with the International Small Arms Control Standards (ISASCs) and International Ammunition Technical Guidelines (IATGs).For more information:www.goo.gl/vSCFWb SEASON’S GREETINGS The team of the United Nations Regional Centre for Peace and Disarmament in Africa (UNREC) wishes you a Happy New Year 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Press Statement on the Central African Republic
    Code: SC/PR 1/1 Committee: Security Council Topic: The crisis in the Central African Republic Security Council Press Statement on the Central African Republic The members of the Security Council support the results of the presidential elections of 27th December 2020 in the Central African Republic and the officially elected president. They express their concern over the deteriorating military and political situation and the threat of government overthrow. Further, they confirm the importance of restoring state power throughout the entire territory of the country. The members of the Security Council express their deepest concern about the new outbreak of the Ebola disease in the Central African Republic. They urge the international community to provide vaccines and medical equipment to the people of CAR to combat the disease. The Security Council strongly opposes the violence and crimes committed by certain rebellious groups with the support of former President François Bozizé trying to undermine the electoral process, and condemns the violations of the Political Agreement for Peace and Reconciliation, signed by the Government of the Central African Republic and armed groups in Bangui on 6th February 2019. The Security Council urges all signatory parties to fully honour their commitments and join the path of dialogue and peace. The Security Council recalls that individuals or entities who are threatening the stabilization of the country may be targeted under a Security Council sanctions regime. Violence fueled by disinformation campaigns is also strongly condemned. The Security Council stresses the urgent need to end impunity in the CAR and to let justice prevail over perpetrators of violations of international humanitarian law and of violations and abuses of human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • 2134 ISS Monograph 116 Sierra Leone.Indd
    ISS MONOGRAPH No 116 PERPETUATING POWER: SMALL ARMS IN POST-CONFLICT SIERRA LEONE AND LIBERIA It is estimated that between eight and ten million small arms are circulating in West Africa; the real number is probably higher. Civil war in the Mano River Basin, where resources such as diamonds, rubber, and timber create buying power for political factions of all persuasions, has sustained the international flow of weapons to the region. With United Nations missions in both Sierra Leone and Liberia and the accompanying disarmament and demobilisation in both places having come to an end, markets for small arms and light weapons in West Africa are still open for business. Disarmament, demobilisation, and reintegration processes have created their own weapons markets across borders as prices for handing over a weapon vary from country to country. State-centred solutions to illicit arms proliferation do not work when the state in question cannot fund traditional security operations. Borders are porous, and though they should be closed or better monitored, that is not a short- or medium-term option. Instead, this monograph looks at the factors behind the demand for weapons in Sierra Leone and Liberia, focusing on the buyer side of the market to determine whether proliferation can be stemmed, or at least slowed down, through more creative measures. Price: R20-00 PPERPETRATINGERPETRATING PPOWEROWER SMALL ARMS IN POST-CONFLICT SIERRA LEONE AND LIBERIA TAYA WEISS The vision of the Institute for Security Studies is one of a stable and peaceful Africa characterised by human rights, the rule of law, democracy and collaborative security.
    [Show full text]
  • Arms Embargoes Chapter
    Sanctions Sans Commitment: An Assessment of UN Arms Embargoes By David Cortright, George A. Lopez, with Linda Gerber An impeccable logic makes arms embargoes a potentially powerful instrument in the array of United Nations (UN) peace- and security-building mechanisms. By denying aggressors and human rights abusers the implements of war and repression, arms embargoes contribute directly to preventing and reducing the level of armed conflict.1 There could hardly be a more appropriate tool for international peacemaking. Moreover, in constricting only selected weapons and military-related goods and services, and in denying these to ruling elites, their armies, and other violent combatants, arms embargoes constitute the quintessential example of a smart sanction. Not only do arms embargoes avoid doing harm to vulnerable and innocent civilian populations; the better the embargoes’ enforcement, the more innocent lives are likely to be saved. This powerful logic may explain why arms embargoes are the most frequently employed form of economic sanction. Since 1990, the UN Security Council has imposed mandatory arms embargoes in twelve of its fourteen sanctions cases. See the table “Selected Cases of Arms Embargoes, 1990-2001” for a complete listing of Security Council arms embargoes in the past decade. Only in the cases of Cambodia and Sudan did the Security Council choose not to apply a restriction on arms imports. In most cases arms embargoes were part of a broader package of sanctions measures. In some cases (Angola, Rwanda since 1995, and Sierra Leone since 1998) arms embargoes have been targeted against rebel movements fighting against an established government. In all other cases arms embargoes were applied against governments deemed to be violating human rights and posing a threat to international peace.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Arms Embargo Against South Africa: an Analysis of the Laws, Regulations, and Loopholes
    Comment The United States Arms Embargo Against South Africa: An Analysis of the Laws, Regulations, and Loopholes Raymond Paretzkyt Introduction With reports of violence and unrest in the Republic of South Africa a daily feature in American newspapers, public attention in the United States has increasingly focused on a variety of American efforts to bring an end to apartheid.. Little discussed in the ongoing debate over imposi- tion of new measures is the sanction that the United States has main- tained for the past twenty-three years: the South African arms embargo. How effective has this sanction been in denying South Africa access to items with military utility? Are there ways to strengthen the arms em- bargo so that it achieves greater success? An evaluation of the embargo is complicated by the fact that there is no one place in which the laws implementing it can be found. Rather, the relevant regulations have been incorporated into the existing, com- plex scheme of U.S. trade law. This article offers a complete account of the laws and regulations implementing the embargo, analyzes the defects in the regulatory scheme, and recommends ways to strengthen the em- bargo. The first part outlines the background of the imposition of the embargo, while the next three parts examine the regulations that govern American exports to South Africa and explore the loopholes in these reg- ulations that hinder their effectiveness. Part II discusses items on the t J.D. Candidate, Yale University. 1. Congress recently imposed various sanctions on South Africa. See Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid Act of 1986, Pub.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Arms Embargo of 1975–78 and Its Effects on The
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2014-09 þÿThe U.S. arms embargo of 1975ÿ–1978 and its effects on the development of the Turkish defense industry Durmaz, Mahmut Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/43905 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS THE U.S. ARMS EMBARGO OF 1975–1978 AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE TURKISH DEFENSE INDUSTRY by Mahmut Durmaz September 2014 Thesis Advisor: Robert E. Looney Second Reader: Victoria Clement Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704–0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED September 2014 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS THE U.S. ARMS EMBARGO OF 1975–1978 AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE TURKISH DEFENSE INDUSTRY 6.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION Service for Foreign Policy Instruments
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Service for Foreign Policy Instruments This list is subject to the legal notice at http://ec.europa.eu/geninfo/legal_notices_en.htm European Union Restrictive measures (sanctions) in force (Regulations based on Article 215 TFEU and Decisions adopted in the framework of the Common Foreign and Security Policy) This list has been updated on 7.7.2016 Related links: (previous update: 20.4.2016) Sanctions Overview Financial sanctions: Electronic consolidated list EU restrictive measures in force (updated 7.7.2016) 1/114 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Service for Foreign Policy Instruments This list is subject to the legal notice at http://ec.europa.eu/geninfo/legal_notices_en.htm Introduction Article 215 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) provides a legal basis for the interruption or reduction, in part or completely, of the Union’s economic and financial relations with one or more third countries, where such restrictive measures are necessary to achieve the objectives of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). This list presents the European Union's restrictive measures in force on the date mentioned on the cover page. It comprises: the legislative measures based on Article 215 TFEU and those based on the relevant provisions of the Treaty establishing the European Community (in the years prior to 1 December 2009: Articles 60 and 301) and the relevant CFSP Decisions and (prior to 1 December 2009) Common Positions, including those which merely provide for measures for which no specific Regulation was made, such as restrictions on admission. In Union law Regulations are directly applicable in all EU Member States.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberia:Liberia: Backback Toto Thethe Futurefuture What Is the Future of Liberia’S Forests and Its Effects on Regional Peace?
    Recommendations contained on page 1 Liberia:Liberia: BackBack toto thethe FutureFuture What is the future of Liberia’s forests and its effects on regional peace? A Report by Global Witness. May 2004 Liberia—Back to the Future Recommendations The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) should: The United Nations Mission in Liberia (UNMIL) should: G Maintain the embargo on the export and transport of Liberian timber, and its import into G Ensure that regular patrols are carried out in both other countries. The embargo should remain in interior and border areas to ensure the collection place until it can be demonstrated that the of comprehensive intelligence on trafficking Liberian timber trade does not contribute to activities and abuses against the civilian national and regional insecurity. population. G Utilise UNMIL to secure Liberia’s lucrative G Work closely with the International Criminal natural resources, assess and monitor any existing Court (ICC) to determine how, during the course and likely cross-border land and sea-based of carrying out its duties, UNMIL can smuggling routes, and coordinate the region’s UN mainstream data-collection to include information peacekeeping forces and national military forces to that may be of use for potential war crimes create more effective border security and prevent tribunals. cross-border trafficking of weapons, mercenaries G Engage local Liberian NGOs in policy-setting and and natural resources. decision-making processes in order to ensure G Amend the Liberian DDRR mandate to thorough and effective implementation of its incorporate foreign nationals fighting in Liberia mandate. into national or sub-regional disarmament programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HUMAN COST of UNCONTROLLED ARMS in AFRICA Cross-National Research on Seven African Countries
    OXFAM RESEARCH REPORTS MARCH 2017 Photo: Sven Torfinn/Oxfam THE HUMAN COST OF UNCONTROLLED ARMS IN AFRICA Cross-national research on seven African countries ADESOJI ADENIYI, Ph.D. Prolonged conflict, proxy wars, and inter-communal strife characterize many regions in Africa. This violence has caused untold atrocities, deaths, sexual violence, and displacement, as well as accelerating poverty and shattering lives and communities across the continent. Uncontrolled arms in Africa fuel this violence and are increasingly putting lives at immense risk. This report provides evidence about the human costs of uncontrolled arms: injuries and fatalities, internally displaced people and refugees, gender-based violence, and erosion of social cohesion and communal trust. Covering Mali, Central African Republic, South Sudan, Sudan, Democratic Republic of Congo, Somalia and Libya, it provides arms control recommendations to African states, the African Union and Regional Economic Communities, donor communities, and the private sector. www.oxfam.org CONTENTS Executive summary 3 1 Introduction 6 2 Uncontrolled arms in Africa 11 3 The human cost of uncontrolled arms in Africa 18 4 Combating uncontrolled arms in Africa: The relevance of the ATT 25 5 Conclusion 28 2 The Human Cost of Uncontrolled Arms in Africa EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The question of uncontrolled arms, their illicit acquisition and their transfer is a recurring security dilemma in Africa. The concentration of most of Africa’s estimated 100 million uncontrolled small arms and light weapons (SALW) in crisis zones and other security-challenged environments often exacerbates and elongates conflicts. This brings devastating costs to individuals, families, and communities who experience displacement, erosion of social cohesion and trust, gender based violence (GBV), injuries and fatalities.
    [Show full text]
  • The EU Arms Embargo on China: a Swedish Perspective
    The EU Arms Embargo on China: a Swedish Perspective JERKER HELLstrÖM FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency, is a mainly assignment-funded agency under the Ministry of Defence. The core activities are research, method and technology development, as well as studies conducted in the interests of Swedish defence and the safety and security of society. The organisation employs approximately 1000 personnel of whom about 800 are scientists. This makes FOI Sweden’s largest research institute. FOI gives its customers access to leading-edge expertise in a large number of fields such as security policy studies, defence and security related analyses, the assessment of various types of threat, systems for control and management of crises, protection against and management of hazardous substances, IT security and the potential offered by new sensors. FOI Swedish Defence Research Agency Phone: +46 8 555 030 00 www.foi.se FOI-R--2946--SE User report Defence Analysis Defence Analysis Fax: +46 8 555 031 00 ISSN 1650-1942 January 2010 SE-164 90 Stockholm Jerker Hellström The EU Arms Embargo on China: a Swedish Perspective Cover illustration: Dagens Nyheter 5, 6 June 1989, the Times 28 June 1989 FOI-R--2946--SE Title The EU Arms Embargo on China: a Swedish Perspective Report no FOI-R--2946--SE Report Type User report Month January Year 2010 Pages 60 ISSN ISSN 1650-1942 Customer Swedish Ministry of Defence Project no A12004 Approved by Maria Lignell Jakobsson FOI, Totalförsvarets Forskningsinstitut FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency Avdelningen för Försvarsanalys Department of Defence Analysis 164 90 Stockholm SE-164 90 Stockholm Summary This report highlights the background of the EU arms embargo on China; how the issues of the design and the possible lifting of the embargo have been handled in Brussels; and in what respect political interpretations and economic interests have influenced exports of military equipment to China from EU member states.
    [Show full text]