DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Content

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Content Zooplankton dynamics, fish zonation and trophic interactions at two seamounts in contrasting regimes of the Eastern Atlantic Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades an der Fakultät für Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaften der Universität Hamburg vorgelegt von Anneke Denda Hamburg 2015 Tag der Disputation: 06. November 2015 Folgende Gutachter empfehlen die Annahme der Dissertation: Prof. Dr. C. Möllmann Prof. Dr. F. Buchholz __________________________________________________________________________________ Table of Content 1 Summary ...........................................................................................................................................1 2 Zusammenfassung............................................................................................................................3 3 General Introduction .......................................................................................................................7 3.1 Seamount ecosystems ..................................................................................................................7 3.2 Microzooplankton vs. mesozooplankton ...................................................................................10 3.3 Respiratory carbon demand .......................................................................................................10 3.4 Stable isotopes in trophic analyses ............................................................................................11 3.5 Objectives of the study ..............................................................................................................12 3.6 References..................................................................................................................................15 4 Manuscript 1: Zooplankton distribution patterns at two seamounts in the subtropical and tropical NE Atlantic 4.1 Abstract......................................................................................................................................21 4.2 Introduction................................................................................................................................22 4.2.1 Study sites .........................................................................................................................24 4.2.1.1 Ampère Seamount....................................................................................................24 4.2.1.2 Senghor Seamount ...................................................................................................24 4.3 Material and Methods................................................................................................................25 4.3.1 Zooplankton sampling......................................................................................................25 4.3.2 Biomass analyses .............................................................................................................27 4.3.3 Statistical analyses ...........................................................................................................27 4.3.4 Calculation of respiratory carbon demand .......................................................................27 4.3.5 Taxonomic analyses.........................................................................................................28 4.4 Results .......................................................................................................................................28 4.4.1 Hydrography ....................................................................................................................28 4.4.2 Zooplankton composition.................................................................................................29 4.4.3 Distribution of standing stocks and size classes...............................................................30 4.4.4 Small-scale distribution of standing stocks in the upper 100 m: orthogonal transects ....32 4.4.5 Biomass concentrations and size class distribution from horizontal surveys ..................33 4.4.6 Vertical distribution patterns of biomass concentrations .................................................37 4.4.7 Carbon demand ................................................................................................................38 4.5 Discussion..................................................................................................................................39 4.5.1 Latitudinal and seasonal variability of zooplankton biomass ..........................................39 4.5.1.1 Ampère Seamount and the sphere of the subtropical gyre.......................................40 4.5.1.2 Senghor Seamount and the sphere of the tropical gyre............................................41 4.5.2 Latitudinal differences in zooplankton composition........................................................42 __________________________________________________________________________________ 4.5.3 Small-scale spatial variability and size distribution patterns of zooplankton biomass ....42 4.5.3.1 Sphere of Ampère Seamount ...................................................................................43 4.5.3.2 Sphere of Senghor Seamount...................................................................................44 4.5.4 Latitudinal and vertical variability of zooplankton respiratory carbon demand ..............45 4.6 Conclusions................................................................................................................................47 4.7 Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................47 4.8 References..................................................................................................................................48 5 Manuscript 2: Microzooplankton and the dispersal of meroplanktonic larvae at two seamounts in the subtropical and tropical NE Atlantic 5.1 Abstract......................................................................................................................................53 5.2 Introduction................................................................................................................................54 5.3 Materials and Methods ..............................................................................................................55 5.3.1 Study sites ........................................................................................................................55 5.3.1.1 Ampère Seamount....................................................................................................55 5.3.1.2 Senghor Seamount ...................................................................................................56 5.3.2 Hydrographic data collection ...........................................................................................57 5.3.3 Zooplankton sampling......................................................................................................57 5.3.4 Biomass analyses and carbon demand .............................................................................59 5.3.5 Taxonomic analyses.........................................................................................................60 5.3.6 Data analyses....................................................................................................................61 5.4 Results .......................................................................................................................................62 5.4.1 Hydrography ....................................................................................................................62 5.4.2 Abundance and composition............................................................................................66 5.4.2.1 Total Zooplankton....................................................................................................66 5.4.2.2 Associations between zooplankton and location......................................................70 5.4.2.3 Meroplanktonic larvae .............................................................................................71 5.4.3 Spatial distribution of biomass standing stocks ..............................................................74 5.4.4 Vertical biomass distribution ...........................................................................................76 5.4.5 Carbon demand ................................................................................................................79 5.5 Discussion..................................................................................................................................80 5.5.1 The influence of the large-scale current regime and the local flow field on biomass and abundance..................................................................................................................................81 5.5.2 The influence of oxygen concentration and food supply on the vertical distribution......82 5.5.3 The composition of the zooplankton community.............................................................83 5.5.4 The distribution of meroplanktonic larvae.......................................................................85 5.5.5 The variability of zooplankton respiratory carbon demand .............................................87 5.6 Conclusions................................................................................................................................88
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020 Ocean Twilight Zone Annual Report
    AUDACIOUS PROJECT ANNUAL REPORT Fiscal Year 2020 CONTENTS 3 Introduction 6 Accelerating Fundamental Knowledge 13 Advancing Technology 18 Informing Policy 20 Raising Public Awareness 24 Collaborating and Engaging Academia 26 Establishing Best Practices 28 Funding and Fundraising We have embarked on a bold new journey to explore one of our planet’s final frontiers—the ocean twilight zone (OTZ), a vast, remote part of the ocean teeming with life, which remains shrouded in mystery. Our goal is to rapidly explore, discover, and understand the twilight zone and to share our knowledge in ways that support sustainable use of marine resources for the health of our ocean and our planet. Cover: Larval tube anemone (Ceriantharia). Above: Black dragonfish (Idiacanthus). (Photos by Paul Caiger, © Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution) A shadowgraph image of a siphonophore taken by ISIIS. (© Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution) Introduction In the first two years of the Ocean Twilight Zone project, we formed a core, multi-disciplinary team of 12 scientists and developed an integrated work plan aligned with the proj- ect’s phase one theme: “initiate, accelerate, and engage.” It has created a firm foundation and infrastructure for future research; developed a growing arsenal of tools and techniques to understand the twilight zone; and dramatically improved awareness of this vast ecosystem’s importance within inter- national policy making groups. The team’s continued success is due in part to its powerful suite of sampling and analysis methods. It employs a wide range of different but complementary tech- niques, empowering the team to fill in gaps and shortcomings with higher confi- dence than any single method could produce.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1. (Online Supplementary Material) Species, Gliding Strategies
    Appendix 1. (Online Supplementary Material) Species, gliding strategies, species distributions, geographic range sizes, habitat, and egg buoyancy characteristics used for concentrated changes tests. Species Gliding strategy Species distribution (reference #) Geographic range size Habitat (reference #) Egg buoyancy (reference #) Cheilopogon abei (Parin, 1996) 4 wings Indian, Indo-Pacific (1) 2 or more ocean basins meroepipelagic (1) Buoyant (2) Cheilopogon atrisignis (Jenkins, 1903) 4 wings Indian, Pacific (1) 2 or more ocean basins meroepipelgic (3) Buoyant (4) Cheilopogon cyanopterus (Valenciennes, 1847) 4 wings Atlantic, Indo-Pacific (2) 2 or more ocean basins meroepipelgic (3) Non-Buoyant (5) Cheilopogon dorsomacula (Fowler, 1944) 4 wings Pacific (1) within 1 ocean basin holoepipelagic (1) Buoyant (2) Cheilopogon exsiliens (Linnaeus, 1771) 4 wings Atlantic (2) within 1 ocean basin holoepipelagic (3) Buoyant (2,5) Cheilopogon furcatus (Mitchill, 1815) 4 wings Atlantic, Indian, Pacific (6) 2 or more ocean basins holoepipelagic (3) Non-Buoyant (5) Cheilopogon melanurus (Valenciennes, 1847) 4 wings Atlantic (7) within 1 ocean basin meroepipelagic (7) Non-Buoyant (5,8) Cheilopogon pinnatibarbatus (californicus) (Cooper, 1863) 4 wings eastern tropical Pacific (9) within 1 ocean basin meroepipelgic (3) Non-Buoyant (10) Cheilopogon spilonotopterus (Bleeker, 1865) 4 wings Indian and Pacific (1) 2 or more ocean basins meroepipelgic (3) Buoyant (4) Cheilopogon xenopterus (Gilbert, 1890) 4 wings eastern tropical Pacific (11) within 1 ocean basin
    [Show full text]
  • Les Poissons Aveugles (I)
    LES POISSONS AVEUGLES (I) ORIGINE — TAXONOMIE REPARTITION GEOGRAPHIQUE — COMPORTEMENT par G. TH IN ES Laboratoire de Zoophysiologie Université de Louvain Aspirant du Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique SOMMAIRE I. INTRODUCTION. II. HYPOTHESES RELATIVES A L’ORIGINE DES POISSONS AVEUGLES. a) Hypothèse de l’origine accidentelle des faunes cavernicoles. b) Hypothèse de l’adaptation graduelle héréditaire. c) Hypothèse de la préadaptation. d) Hypothèse de l’évolution concomitante des troglobies et des milieux hypogés. e) Hypothèse génétique et physiologique de l’origine des troglobies. f) Hypothèse physiologique de l’origine des troglobies fondée sur les relations entre les conditions physiques du milieu hypogé et le métabolisme des organismes cavernicoles. g) Théorie de l'évolution régressive généralisée. III. POISSONS AVEUGLES ACTUELLEMENT CONNUS. a) Liste taxonomique générale (LISTE A). b) Liste taxonomique individuelle (LISTE B). IV. REPARTITION GEOGRAPHIQUE DES POISSONS AVEUGLES. V. QUELQUES ASPECTS DU COMPORTEMENT DES POISSONS AVEUGLES. a) Comportement général. b) Réactions sensorielles à la nourriture. c) Reproduction. INDEX ALPHABETIQUE DES ESPECES AVEUGLES. BIBLIOGRAPHIE, 6 SOCIÉTÉ ROYALE ZOOLOGIQUE DE BELGIQUE Comme son titre l’indique, la monographie qu’on va lire a été écrite dans le but essentiellement pratique de réunir sur les poissons aveugles un certain nombre de données éparses en raison même de la répartition taxonomique assez irrégulière de ces espèces dans les deux superclasses des Agnatha et surtout des Gnathostomata.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean Volume
    ISBN 0-9689167-4-x Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean (Davis Strait, Southern Greenland and Flemish Cap to Cape Hatteras) Volume One Acipenseriformes through Syngnathiformes Michael P. Fahay ii Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean iii Dedication This monograph is dedicated to those highly skilled larval fish illustrators whose talents and efforts have greatly facilitated the study of fish ontogeny. The works of many of those fine illustrators grace these pages. iv Early Stages of Fishes in the Western North Atlantic Ocean v Preface The contents of this monograph are a revision and update of an earlier atlas describing the eggs and larvae of western Atlantic marine fishes occurring between the Scotian Shelf and Cape Hatteras, North Carolina (Fahay, 1983). The three-fold increase in the total num- ber of species covered in the current compilation is the result of both a larger study area and a recent increase in published ontogenetic studies of fishes by many authors and students of the morphology of early stages of marine fishes. It is a tribute to the efforts of those authors that the ontogeny of greater than 70% of species known from the western North Atlantic Ocean is now well described. Michael Fahay 241 Sabino Road West Bath, Maine 04530 U.S.A. vi Acknowledgements I greatly appreciate the help provided by a number of very knowledgeable friends and colleagues dur- ing the preparation of this monograph. Jon Hare undertook a painstakingly critical review of the entire monograph, corrected omissions, inconsistencies, and errors of fact, and made suggestions which markedly improved its organization and presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Index of Scientific and Vernacular Names
    Cephalopods of the World 249 7. INDEX OF SCIENTIFIC AND VERNACULAR NAMES Explanation of the System Italics : Valid scientific names (double entry by genera and species) Italics : Synonyms, misidentifications and subspecies (double entry by genera and species) ROMAN : Family names ROMAN : Scientific names of divisions, classes, subclasses, orders, suborders and subfamilies Roman : FAO names Roman : Local names 250 FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes No. 4, Vol. 1 A B Acanthosepion pageorum .....................118 Babbunedda ................................184 Acanthosepion whitleyana ....................128 bandensis, Sepia ..........................72, 138 aculeata, Sepia ............................63–64 bartletti, Blandosepia ........................138 acuminata, Sepia..........................97,137 bartletti, Sepia ............................72,138 adami, Sepia ................................137 bartramii, Ommastrephes .......................18 adhaesa, Solitosepia plangon ..................109 bathyalis, Sepia ..............................138 affinis, Sepia ...............................130 Bathypolypus sponsalis........................191 affinis, Sepiola.......................158–159, 177 Bathyteuthis .................................. 3 African cuttlefish..............................73 baxteri, Blandosepia .........................138 Ajia-kouika .................................. 115 baxteri, Sepia.............................72,138 albatrossae, Euprymna ........................181 belauensis, Nautilus .....................51,53–54
    [Show full text]
  • Natura 2000 Sites for Reefs and Submerged Sandbanks Volume II: Northeast Atlantic and North Sea
    Implementation of the EU Habitats Directive Offshore: Natura 2000 sites for reefs and submerged sandbanks Volume II: Northeast Atlantic and North Sea A report by WWF June 2001 Implementation of the EU Habitats Directive Offshore: Natura 2000 sites for reefs and submerged sandbanks A report by WWF based on: "Habitats Directive Implementation in Europe Offshore SACs for reefs" by A. D. Rogers Southampton Oceanographic Centre, UK; and "Submerged Sandbanks in European Shelf Waters" by Veligrakis, A., Collins, M.B., Owrid, G. and A. Houghton Southampton Oceanographic Centre, UK; commissioned by WWF For information please contact: Dr. Sarah Jones WWF UK Panda House Weyside Park Godalming Surrey GU7 1XR United Kingdom Tel +441483 412522 Fax +441483 426409 Email: [email protected] Cover page photo: Trawling smashes cold water coral reefs P.Buhl-Mortensen, University of Bergen, Norway Prepared by Sabine Christiansen and Sarah Jones IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EU HD OFFSHORE REEFS AND SUBMERGED SANDBANKS NE ATLANTIC AND NORTH SEA TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I LIST OF MAPS II LIST OF TABLES III 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 REEFS IN THE NORTHEAST ATLANTIC AND THE NORTH SEA (A.D. ROGERS, SOC) 3 2.1 Data inventory 3 2.2 Example cases for the type of information provided (full list see Vol. IV ) 9 2.2.1 "Darwin Mounds" East (UK) 9 2.2.2 Galicia Bank (Spain) 13 2.2.3 Gorringe Ridge (Portugal) 17 2.2.4 La Chapelle Bank (France) 22 2.3 Bibliography reefs 24 2.4 Analysis of Offshore Reefs Inventory (WWF)(overview maps and tables) 31 2.4.1 North Sea 31 2.4.2 UK and Ireland 32 2.4.3 France and Spain 39 2.4.4 Portugal 41 2.4.5 Conclusions 43 3 SUBMERGED SANDBANKS IN EUROPEAN SHELF WATERS (A.
    [Show full text]
  • Cusk Eels, Brotulas [=Cherublemma Trotter [E
    FAMILY Ophidiidae Rafinesque, 1810 - cusk eels SUBFAMILY Ophidiinae Rafinesque, 1810 - cusk eels [=Ofidini, Otophidioidei, Lepophidiinae, Genypterinae] Notes: Ofidini Rafinesque, 1810b:38 [ref. 3595] (ordine) Ophidion [as Ophidium; latinized to Ophididae by Bonaparte 1831:162, 184 [ref. 4978] (family); stem corrected to Ophidi- by Lowe 1843:92 [ref. 2832], confirmed by Günther 1862a:317, 370 [ref. 1969], by Gill 1872:3 [ref. 26254] and by Carus 1893:578 [ref. 17975]; considered valid with this authorship by Gill 1893b:136 [ref. 26255], by Goode & Bean 1896:345 [ref. 1848], by Nolf 1985:64 [ref. 32698], by Patterson 1993:636 [ref. 32940] and by Sheiko 2013:63 [ref. 32944] Article 11.7.2; family name sometimes seen as Ophidionidae] Otophidioidei Garman, 1899:390 [ref. 1540] (no family-group name) Lepophidiinae Robins, 1961:218 [ref. 3785] (subfamily) Lepophidium Genypterinae Lea, 1980 (subfamily) Genypterus [in unpublished dissertation: Systematics and zoogeography of cusk-eels of the family Ophidiidae, subfamily Ophidiinae, from the eastern Pacific Ocean, University of Miami, not available] GENUS Cherublemma Trotter, 1926 - cusk eels, brotulas [=Cherublemma Trotter [E. S.], 1926:119, Brotuloides Robins [C. R.], 1961:214] Notes: [ref. 4466]. Neut. Cherublemma lelepris Trotter, 1926. Type by monotypy. •Valid as Cherublemma Trotter, 1926 -- (Pequeño 1989:48 [ref. 14125], Robins in Nielsen et al. 1999:27, 28 [ref. 24448], Castellanos-Galindo et al. 2006:205 [ref. 28944]). Current status: Valid as Cherublemma Trotter, 1926. Ophidiidae: Ophidiinae. (Brotuloides) [ref. 3785]. Masc. Leptophidium emmelas Gilbert, 1890. Type by original designation (also monotypic). •Synonym of Cherublemma Trotter, 1926 -- (Castro-Aguirre et al. 1993:80 [ref. 21807] based on placement of type species, Robins in Nielsen et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lower Bathyal and Abyssal Seafloor Fauna of Eastern Australia T
    O’Hara et al. Marine Biodiversity Records (2020) 13:11 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41200-020-00194-1 RESEARCH Open Access The lower bathyal and abyssal seafloor fauna of eastern Australia T. D. O’Hara1* , A. Williams2, S. T. Ahyong3, P. Alderslade2, T. Alvestad4, D. Bray1, I. Burghardt3, N. Budaeva4, F. Criscione3, A. L. Crowther5, M. Ekins6, M. Eléaume7, C. A. Farrelly1, J. K. Finn1, M. N. Georgieva8, A. Graham9, M. Gomon1, K. Gowlett-Holmes2, L. M. Gunton3, A. Hallan3, A. M. Hosie10, P. Hutchings3,11, H. Kise12, F. Köhler3, J. A. Konsgrud4, E. Kupriyanova3,11,C.C.Lu1, M. Mackenzie1, C. Mah13, H. MacIntosh1, K. L. Merrin1, A. Miskelly3, M. L. Mitchell1, K. Moore14, A. Murray3,P.M.O’Loughlin1, H. Paxton3,11, J. J. Pogonoski9, D. Staples1, J. E. Watson1, R. S. Wilson1, J. Zhang3,15 and N. J. Bax2,16 Abstract Background: Our knowledge of the benthic fauna at lower bathyal to abyssal (LBA, > 2000 m) depths off Eastern Australia was very limited with only a few samples having been collected from these habitats over the last 150 years. In May–June 2017, the IN2017_V03 expedition of the RV Investigator sampled LBA benthic communities along the lower slope and abyss of Australia’s eastern margin from off mid-Tasmania (42°S) to the Coral Sea (23°S), with particular emphasis on describing and analysing patterns of biodiversity that occur within a newly declared network of offshore marine parks. Methods: The study design was to deploy a 4 m (metal) beam trawl and Brenke sled to collect samples on soft sediment substrata at the target seafloor depths of 2500 and 4000 m at every 1.5 degrees of latitude along the western boundary of the Tasman Sea from 42° to 23°S, traversing seven Australian Marine Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross Seamount South Point
    PFRP PI Meeting 2008 David Itano1, Kim Holland2 and Kevin Weng3 1 Pelagic Fisheries Research Program, University of Hawaii at Manoa 2 Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, University of Hawaii, 3 University of Hawaii at Manoa, School of Earth Science Technology Hawaii Tuna Tagging Project (1995- 2001) (archipelagic scale, conventional dart tags for Movementbigeyeof bigeye and yellowfin and yellowfin tuna) within the Hawaii EEZ and between major fishing grounds. (exchange rates) Interaction à direct gear interaction / concurrent interaction à sequential or growth interactions à spatially segregated interaction Exploitation rates and differential vulnerability (local fishing mortality) of tuna around seamounts and FADs Aggregation effects - retention rates of bigeye and yellowfin tuna around seamounts, FADs and local HTTP: objectives and outcomes 17,986 bigeye and yellowfin tagged @ 53:47 ratio à 12.6% overall recapture rate Bulk transfer model developed to describe tag loss by all means … between offshore FADs/seamount, inshore areas and offshore LL fishery à Estimated transfer (movement) rates à Estimated size and species-specific M and F rates Calculated residence times and exploitation rates Provided a closer definition of fisheries and exploitation patterns 150 E 160 E 170 E 180 170 W 160 W 150 W 140 W 40 N USA JAPAN 30 N MEXICO Minami Tori HAWAII Shima Wake 20 N CNMI (US) Johnston (US) Guam Marshall Islands 10 N Federated States of Micronesia Palmyra Palau (US) Howland & Indonesia Nauru Kiribati Baker Jarvis 0 Papua New Guinea (US) Line Phoenix Islands Islands (Kiribati) (Kiribati) Tuvalu Solomon Islands 10 S WF SamoaAmerican Fiji Samoa Cook Islands Australia Vanuatu French Polynesia New Niue 20 S Caledonia Tonga Pitcairn (U.K.) New Zealand 180 170W 160W 150W 140W Yellowfin in red Bigeye in blue 30N 20N Johnston 10N Palmyra Line Islands 160 W 155 W Necker NOAA B-1 Nihoa Main Hawaiian Islands Kauai Niihau Oahu Kaula Kaena Pt.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Pelagic Longline Fishing on Seamount Ecosystems Based on Interviews with Pacific Island Fishers
    Effects of Pelagic Longline Fishing on Seamount Ecosystems Based on Interviews with Pacific Island Fishers This publication was prepared by IUCN as a part of the Oceanic Fisheries Management Project, funded by the Global Environment Facility, through the United Nations Development Program. The Project aims to achieve global environmental benefits by enhanced conservation and management of transboundary oceanic fishery resources in the Pacific Islands region and the protection of the biodiversity of the Western Tropical Pacific Warm Pool Large Marine Ecosystem. It is executed by the Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency in conjunction with the Secretariat of the Pacific Community and IUCN. Website: http://www.ffa.int/gef/. The designation of geographical entities in this document, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN or contributory organizations, nor does citing of trade names or commercial processes constitute endorsement. Published by: IUCN Oceania Regional Office, Suva, FIJI Copyright: © 2010 International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Oceania Regional Office. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holders. Cover photos: Interviewing fishermen in Tonga, courtesy of Telmo Morato.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulations of Strong Ground Motion in SW Iberia for the 1969 February 28 (Ms = 8.0) and the 1755 November 1 ( M ∼ 8.5) Earthq
    September 12, 2007 9:54 GeophysicalJournalInternational gji3571 Geophys. J. Int. (2007) doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03571.x Simulations of strong ground motion in SW Iberia for the 1969 February 28 (M s = 8.0) and the 1755 November 1 (M ∼ 8.5) earthquakes – II. Strong ground motion simulations ,∗ , , , Rapha¨el Grandin,1 Jos´e Fernando Borges,1 2 Mourad Bezzeghoud,1 2 Bento Caldeira1 2 and Fernando Carrilho3 1Centro de Geof´ısica de Evora,´ Universidade de Evora,´ Evora,´ Portugal 2Departmento de F´ısica, Universidade de Evora,´ Evora,´ Portugal 3Instituto de Meteorologia, Lisbon, Portugal Accepted 2007 July 30. Received 2007 July 30; in original form 2006 November 24 SUMMARY This is the second paper of a series of two concerning strong ground motion in SW Iberia due to earthquakes originating from the adjacent Atlantic area. The aim of this paper is to use the velocity model that was proposed and validated in the companion paper for seismic intensity modelling of the 1969 (M s = 8.0) and 1755 (M = 8.5–8.7) earthquakes. First, we propose a regression to convert simulated values of Peak Ground Velocity (PGV) into Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) in SW Iberia, and using this regression, we build synthetic isoseismal maps for a large (M s = 8.0) earthquake that occurred in 1969. Based on information on the seismic source provided by various authors, we show that the velocity model effectively reproduces macroseismic observations in the whole region. We also confirm that seismic intensity distribution is very sensitive to a small number of source parameters: rupture directivity, fault strike and fault dimensions.
    [Show full text]