2013 Program (PDF)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Annual Report
storytellers 2010 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 Buchtel Boulevard Denver, Colorado 80210 303.871.4885 www.cablecenter.org The Cable Center Mission The Cable Center Staff Christen Adams Bailey Doehler Ryan Peru Joyce Alden-Schuyler Jana Henthorn Jaime Reitz Lisa Backman Jennifer Kaufling Larry Satkowiak Robin Berhost Brian Kenny Dorothy Segovia Diane Christman Steve Luiting Jennifer Stamm Lela Cocoros Riccardo Mazzeo Devon Svejcar Laura Cymansky Sarah Morley James White Peter Derschang Shannon Novosel Dolly Wolf As of 12/31/10 Board of Directors Honorary Board Chairman Directors Julian A. Brodsky Michael S. Willner Bridget L. Baker Chuck Dolan Char Beales Frank M. Drendel Vice Chairman John Bickham Joseph S. Gans, Sr. Jerald L. Kent Matthew C. Blank Alan Gerry Sean Bratches Dr. Richard R. Green Treasurer & Ann Carlsen John W. Goddard Secretary David Cohen Gustave M. Hauser David Van Valkenburg Brian Deevy John Hendricks Dwight B. Duke Leo J. Hindery, Jr. Executive Kimberly Edmunds Amos B. Hostetter, Jr. Committee Michael Fries Marvin L. Jones Nickolas Davatzes Andrew T. Heller Raymond E. Joslin Larry Satkowiak Peter Kalan Gerald Levin Peter Stern Paul Liao Robert J. Lewis Phil Lind John Malone Paul S. Maxwell Robert J. Miron Trygve E. Myhren Thomas F. Puckett Josh Sapan Leslie “Les” H. Read Italia Commisso Weinand John V. Saeman Barbara York Stanley M. Searle David M. Zaslav Gail F. Sermersheim John J. Sie R. E. “Ted” Turner 1 Larry Satkowiak Michael S. Willner Dear Friends, Dear Friends and Colleagues, Last year at this time, I introduced to you the new mission statement of The Cable Center, which better defined the It is a deep honor to have served as the chairman of the board of directors of The Cable Center for the past three years. -
The Walking Dead
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov ESTTA Tracking number: ESTTA1080950 Filing date: 09/10/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Proceeding 91217941 Party Plaintiff Robert Kirkman, LLC Correspondence JAMES D WEINBERGER Address FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC 151 WEST 42ND STREET, 17TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10036 UNITED STATES Primary Email: [email protected] 212-813-5900 Submission Plaintiff's Notice of Reliance Filer's Name James D. Weinberger Filer's email [email protected] Signature /s/ James D. Weinberger Date 09/10/2020 Attachments F3676523.PDF(42071 bytes ) F3678658.PDF(2906955 bytes ) F3678659.PDF(5795279 bytes ) F3678660.PDF(4906991 bytes ) IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ROBERT KIRKMAN, LLC, Cons. Opp. and Canc. Nos. 91217941 (parent), 91217992, 91218267, 91222005, Opposer, 91222719, 91227277, 91233571, 91233806, 91240356, 92068261 and 92068613 -against- PHILLIP THEODOROU and ANNA THEODOROU, Applicants. ROBERT KIRKMAN, LLC, Opposer, -against- STEVEN THEODOROU and PHILLIP THEODOROU, Applicants. OPPOSER’S NOTICE OF RELIANCE ON INTERNET DOCUMENTS Opposer Robert Kirkman, LLC (“Opposer”) hereby makes of record and notifies Applicant- Registrant of its reliance on the following internet documents submitted pursuant to Rule 2.122(e) of the Trademark Rules of Practice, 37 C.F.R. § 2.122(e), TBMP § 704.08(b), and Fed. R. Evid. 401, and authenticated pursuant to Fed. -
REDACTED VERSION Before the Federal Communications
REDACTED VERSION Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 FCC 16D-1 In the Matter of ) ) Game Show Network, LLC, ) Complainant, ) MB Docket No. 12-122 ) v. ) File No. CSR-8529-P ) Cablevision Systems Corp. ) Defendant. ) Issued: November 22, 2016 Released: November 23, 2016 INITIAL DECISION OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE RICHARD L. SIPPEL Appearances Stephen A. Weiswasser, Esq., Paul W. Schmidt, Esq., Elizabeth H. Canter, Esq., Laura Flahive Wu, Esq., Stephen Kiehl, Esq., C. William Phillips, Esq., and Jonathan M. Sperling, Esq., on behalf of Game Show Network, LLC; Jay Cohen, Esq., Andrew G. Gordon, Esq., Gary R. Carney, Esq., George W. Kroup, Esq., Tara M. Corvo, Esq., and Robert G. Kidwell, Esq., on behalf of Cablevision Systems Corporation; and Pamela S. Kane, Esq., and William Knowles-Kellett, Esq., on behalf of the Enforcement Bureau. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................................ 1 II. FINDINGS OF FACT .......................................................................................................................... 10 A. Description of Parties and Background ......................................................................................... 10 1. Game Show Network .............................................................................................................. 10 2. Cablevision Systems Corporation .......................................................................................... -
The Pentagon Papers Case and the Wikileaks Controversy: National Security and the First Amendment
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works Faculty Scholarship 2011 The Pentagon Papers Case and the Wikileaks Controversy: National Security and the First Amendment Jerome A. Barron George Washington University Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation 1 Wake Forest J. L. & Pol'y 49 (2011) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. V._JB_FINAL READ_NT'L SEC. & FA (DO NOT DELETE) 4/18/2011 11:10 AM THE PENTAGON PAPERS CASE AND THE WIKILEAKS CONTROVERSY: NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT JEROME A. BARRON † INTRODUCTION n this Essay, I will focus on two clashes between national security I and the First Amendment—the first is the Pentagon Papers case, the second is the WikiLeaks controversy.1 I shall first discuss the Pentagon Papers case. The Pentagon Papers case began with Daniel Ellsberg,2 a former Vietnam War supporter who became disillusioned with the war. Ellsberg first worked for the Rand Corporation, which has strong associations with the Defense Department, and in 1964, he worked in the Pentagon under then-Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara.3 He then served as a civilian government employee for the U.S. State Department in Vietnam4 before returning to the United † Harold H. Greene Professor of Law, The George Washington University Law School (1998–present); Dean, The George Washington University Law School (1979– 1988); B.A., Tufts University; J.D., Yale Law School; LL.M., The George Washington University. -
Free Speech and Civil Liberties in the Second Circuit
Fordham Law Review Volume 85 Issue 1 Article 3 2016 Free Speech and Civil Liberties in the Second Circuit Floyd Abrams Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Floyd Abrams, Free Speech and Civil Liberties in the Second Circuit, 85 Fordham L. Rev. 11 (2016). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol85/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FREE SPEECH AND CIVIL LIBERTIES IN THE SECOND CIRCUIT Floyd Abrams* INTRODUCTION Much of the development of First Amendment law in the United States has occurred as a result of American courts rejecting well-established principles of English law. The U.S. Supreme Court has frequently rejected English law, permitting far more public criticism of the judiciary than would be countenanced in England, rejecting English libel law as being insufficiently protective of freedom of expression1 and holding that even hateful speech directed at minorities receives the highest level of constitutional protection.2 The Second Circuit has played a major role in the movement away from the strictures of the law as it existed in the mother country. In some areas, dealing with the clash between claims of national security and freedom of expression, the Second Circuit predated the Supreme Court’s protective First Amendment rulings. -
Wikileaks, the First Amendment and the Press by Jonathan Peters1
WikiLeaks, the First Amendment and the Press By Jonathan Peters1 Using a high-security online drop box and a well-insulated website, WikiLeaks has published 75,000 classified U.S. documents about the war in Afghanistan,2 nearly 400,000 classified U.S. documents about the war in Iraq,3 and more than 2,000 U.S. diplomatic cables.4 In doing so, it has collaborated with some of the most powerful newspapers in the world,5 and it has rankled some of the most powerful people in the world.6 President Barack Obama said in July 2010, right after the release of the Afghanistan documents, that he was “concerned about the disclosure of sensitive information from the battlefield.”7 His concern spread quickly through the echelons of power, as WikiLeaks continued in the fall to release caches of classified U.S. documents. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton condemned the slow drip of diplomatic cables, saying it was “not just an attack on America's foreign policy interests, it [was] an attack on the 1 Jonathan Peters is a lawyer and the Frank Martin Fellow at the Missouri School of Journalism, where he is working on his Ph.D. and specializing in the First Amendment. He has written on legal issues for a variety of newspapers and magazines, and now he writes regularly for PBS MediaShift about new media and the law. E-mail: [email protected]. 2 Noam N. Levey and Jennifer Martinez, A whistle-blower with global resonance; WikiLeaks publishes documents from around the world in its quest for transparency, L.A. -
Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network
Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE May 2016 Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network Laura Osur Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Osur, Laura, "Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network" (2016). Dissertations - ALL. 448. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/448 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract When Netflix launched in April 1998, Internet video was in its infancy. Eighteen years later, Netflix has developed into the first truly global Internet TV network. Many books have been written about the five broadcast networks – NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox, and the CW – and many about the major cable networks – HBO, CNN, MTV, Nickelodeon, just to name a few – and this is the fitting time to undertake a detailed analysis of how Netflix, as the preeminent Internet TV networks, has come to be. This book, then, combines historical, industrial, and textual analysis to investigate, contextualize, and historicize Netflix's development as an Internet TV network. The book is split into four chapters. The first explores the ways in which Netflix's development during its early years a DVD-by-mail company – 1998-2007, a period I am calling "Netflix as Rental Company" – lay the foundations for the company's future iterations and successes. During this period, Netflix adapted DVD distribution to the Internet, revolutionizing the way viewers receive, watch, and choose content, and built a brand reputation on consumer-centric innovation. -
9780195181234.Pdf
LOSING THE NEWS Institutions of American Democracy Kathleen Hall Jamieson and Jaroslav Pelikan, Directors Other books in the series Schooling in America: How the Public Schools Meet the Nation’s Changing Needs Patricia Albjerg Graham The Most Democratic Branch: How the Courts Serve America Jeffrey Rosen The Broken Branch: How Congress Is Failing America and How to Get It Back on Track Thomas E. Mann and Norman J. Ornstein LOSING THE NEWS The Future of the News That Feeds Democracy Alex S. Jones 1 2009 1 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2009 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Jones, Alex S. Losing the news : the future of the news that feeds democracy / Alex S. Jones. p. cm. — (Institutions of American democracy) Includes bibliographical references and index. -
Cablefax Dailytm Cablefax Dailytm
www.cablefax.com, Published by Access Intelligence, LLC, Tel: 301-354-2101 4 Pages Today CableFAX DailyTM Friday — November 8, 2013 What the Industry Reads First Volume 24 / No. 218 AMC Numbers: Shares Fall Despite Shows’ Strong Performance You know what they say about being at the top? It’s just one misstep to the bottom. And so with AMC drawing record ratings for “The Walking Dead” and critical acclaim for its just-wrapped “Breaking Bad,” the question top of mind is can it keep the momentum going—especially given everyone else’s recent push into scripted shows. AMC Networks CEO Josh Sapan acknowledged during Thurs’ earnings call that new entrants are, “in theory,” doing programs similar to AMC. “The networks are doing some shows that look more like cable dramas. SVOD services are themselves doing scripted dramas with some success,” he said. “I think the full implications of that over time are not yet entirely under- stood.” But given the successes beyond AMC (he cited Sundance’s “Rectify”), he sees a significant and increased appetite for scripted drama. Of course, all that programming costs money, and increased expenses in 3Q offset gains from AMC’s popular programming. AMCN shares closed down nearly 6% Thurs as its 3Q profit of $58.1mln for the Q (up nearly 59% YOY) fell short of Wall Street expectations. Revenue grew 19% to $395mln. Bernstein Research said it and fellow bulls will point to the revenue line, while bears will point to AMCN’s earnings line and future growth, with the results unable to put to rest controversy in the stock. -
New York Law School Magazine, Vol. 33, No. 2 New York Law School
digitalcommons.nyls.edu NYLS Publications New York Law School Alumni Magazine 2014 New York Law School Magazine, Vol. 33, No. 2 New York Law School Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/alum_mag Recommended Citation New York Law School, "New York Law School Magazine, Vol. 33, No. 2" (2014). New York Law School Alumni Magazine. Book 1. http://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/alum_mag/1 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the NYLS Publications at DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in New York Law School Alumni Magazine by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@NYLS. Office of Marketing and Communications 185 West Broadway Magazine • 2014 • VOL. 33, nO. 2 New York, NY 10013-2921 SAVE THE DATE REUNION AND ALUMNI WEEKEND APRIl 23–25, 2015 Mark your calendars, and plan to celebrate New York Law School! The 2015 Reunion and Alumni Weekend is shaping up to be an extraordinary occasion for classes ending in 0 and 5—and for the entire NYLS community. You won’t want to miss it! Reunion Year Class Volunteers Needed Do you want to make sure your class is well represented at Reunion? E-mail [email protected] to join your class committee. cOngresswOMan nancY peLOsi The fuTure is nOw: nYLs Makes DeLiVers The shainwaLD pubLic iMpressiVe prOgress On achieVing inTeresT LecTure sTraTegic pLan gOaLs www.nyls.edu P6 P8 WE ARE NEW YORK’S LAW SCHOOL SINCE 1891 The Center for New York City Law marked its 20th year WE ARE NEW YORK’S LAW SCHOOL of presenting the CityLaw Breakfast Series in September, when it hosted Carl Weisbrod, Chair of the NYC Planning Commission. -
Instructor's Guide
The Fight for Free Speech Ten Cases That Define Our First Amendment Freedoms BY IAN ROSENBERG Instructor’s Guide A user’s guide to understanding contemporary free speech issues in the United States Americans today are confronted by a barrage of questions relating to their free speech freedoms. What are libel laws, and do they need to be changed to stop the press from lying? Does Colin Kaepernick have the right to take a knee? Can Saturday Night Live be punished for parody? While citizens are grappling with these questions, they generally have nowhere to turn to learn about the extent of their First Amendment rights. The Fight for Free Speech answers this call with an accessible, engaging user’s guide to free speech. Media lawyer Ian Rosenberg distills the spectrum of free speech law down to ten critical issues. Each chapter in this book focuses on a contemporary free speech question—from student walkouts for gun safety to Samantha Bee’s expletives, from Nazis marching in Charlottesville to the muting of adult film star Stormy Daniels— and then identifies, unpacks, and explains the key Supreme Court case that provides the answers. Together these fascinating stories create a practical framework for understanding where our free speech protections originated and how they can develop in the future. As people on all sides of the political spectrum are demanding their right to speak and be heard, The Fight for Free Speech is a handbook for combating authoritarianism, protecting our democracy, and bringing an understanding of free speech law to all. 312 pages | Cloth | 9781479801565 • • • Law | Politics | Current Events Ian Rosenberg has over twenty years of experience as a media lawyer, and has worked as legal counsel for ABC News since 2003. -
2012 Annual Report
2012 ANNUAL REPORT Table of Contents Letter from the President & CEO ......................................................................................................................5 About The Paley Center for Media ................................................................................................................... 7 Board Lists Board of Trustees ........................................................................................................................................8 Los Angeles Board of Governors ................................................................................................................ 10 Public Programs Media As Community Events ......................................................................................................................14 INSIDEMEDIA/ONSTAGE Events ................................................................................................................15 PALEYDOCFEST ......................................................................................................................................20 PALEYFEST: Fall TV Preview Parties ...........................................................................................................21 PALEYFEST: William S. Paley Television Festival ......................................................................................... 22 Special Screenings .................................................................................................................................... 23 Robert M.