Marine and Freshwater Research, 2019, 70, 908–924 © CSIRO 2019 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF18076 Supplementary material Evolution of placentotrophy: using viviparous sharks as a model to understand vertebrate placental evolution Alice L. BuddleA, James U. Van DykeB, Michael B. ThompsonA, Colin A. SimpfendorferC and Camilla M. WhittingtonD,E AThe University of Sydney, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Heydon-Laurence Building (A08), NSW 2006, Australia. BCharles Sturt University, School of Environmental Sciences, Institute for Land, Water and Society, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia. CJames Cook University, College of Science and Engineering and Centre for Sustainable Tropical Fisheries and Aquaculture, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia. DThe University of Sydney, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia. ECorrespondence. Email:
[email protected] Page 1 of 23 Marine and Freshwater Research © CSIRO 2019 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF18076 Table S1. Table of known parity mode, mode of embryonic nutrition, and other reproductive parameters of extant shark species Viviparous reproductive modes were assigned to species based on evidence of maternal contributions during pregnancy: lecithotrophic (embryos are reliant on yolk stores), lecithotrophic with histotrophy (embryos absorb maternal secretions in the form of histotroph), placental (development of a placental connection between the embryo and mother during pregnancy; note that placental nutrient transport has not necessarily been shown), oophagy (embryos ingest ova produced by the mother), and adelphophagy (embryos ingest sibling in utero). It should be noted that all viviparous species are initially lecithotrophic Order Family Species Parity mode Mode of Size at Litter size Gestation References embryonic birth range period nutrition (cm) (mean) Carcharhiniformes Carcharhinidae Carcharhinus acronotus Viviparous placental 31–36 1–5 (3.53) 11 months Hamlett 2005; Driggers et al.