Group Investments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

216 Group investments Subsidiaries Country of Percentage of Name and address Principal activity Incorporation equity owned AERL Holding Limited Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB England 100% Aer Lingus 2009 DCS Trustee Limited Republic Dublin Airport, Dublin of Ireland 100% Aer Lingus Beachey Limited Penthouse Suite, Analyst House, Peel Road, Isle of Man, IM1 4LZ Isle of Man 100% Aer Lingus Group DAC* Holding Republic Dublin Airport, Dublin company of Ireland 100% Aer Lingus Limited* Airline Republic Dublin Airport, Dublin operations of Ireland 100% Aer Lingus (NI) Limited Northern Aer Lingus Base, Belfast City Airport, Sydenham Bypass, Belfast, BT3 9JH Ireland 100% Aer Lingus (Ireland) Limited Republic Dublin Airport, Dublin of Ireland 100% ALG Trustee Limited Republic Dublin Airport, Dublin of Ireland 100% Avios Group (AGL) Limited* Airline Astral Towers, Betts Way, London Road, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 9XY marketing England 100% Avios South Africa Proprietary Limited South 34 Whitley Road, Unit B, 3rd Floor, Melrose Arch, Melrose North, Johannesburg Africa 100% BA and AA Holdings Limited* Holding Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB company England 100% BA Call Centre India Private Limited (callBA) F-42, East of Kailash, New-Delhi, 110065 India 100% BA Cityflyer Limited* Airline Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB operations England 100% BA European Limited Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB England 100% BA Healthcare Trust Limited Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB England 100% BA Number One Limited Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB England 100% BA Number Two Limited 13 Castle Street, St Helier, JE4 5UT Jersey 100% Bealine Plc Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB England 100% bmibaby Limited Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB England 100% Binter Finance B.V. Prins Bernhardplein 200, Amsterdam, 1097 JB Netherlands 100% BritAir Holdings Limited* Holding Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB company England 100% British Airways Plc* Airline Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB operations England 100%1 British Airways (BA) Limited Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB England 100% British Airways 777 Leasing Limited* Aircraft Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB financing England 100% British Airways Associated Companies Limited Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB England 100% British Airways Avionic Engineering Limited* Aircraft Waterside, PO Box 365, Harmondsworth, UB7 0GB maintenance England 100% British Airways Capital Limited Queensway House, Hilgrove Street, St Helier, JE1 1ES Jersey 100% British Airways E-Jets Leasing Limited* Aircraft Canon’s Court, 22 Victoria Street, Hamilton, HM 12 financing Bermuda 100% British Airways Employee Benefit Trustees (Jersey) Limited Queensway House, Hilgrove Street, St Helier, JE1 1ES Jersey 100% INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP Annual Report and Accounts 2016.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf
EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
[Show full text]
Oneworld Visit Europe 1Aug18
Valid effective from 01 August 2018 Amendments: • Add additional cities permitted for Russia in Europe (RU) and excluded for Russia in Asia (XU) OW VISIT EUROPE 1. Application/Fares and Expenses A. Application Valid for travel within Europe. RT, CT, SOJ, DOJ Economy travel On AY/BA/IB/LA/QR/S7-operated direct flights and through plane services. Applicable to Industry discount international fares /Travel agent fares - passengers must have proof of industry/travel agent employment. Travel on the last international sector in to Europe and the first international sector from Europe must be operated and marketed, or marketed AA/AY/BA/CX/EC/IB/JJ/JL/LA/KA/LP/MH/ QF/QR/RJ/S7/UL/XL/4M. For the purposes of this fare, the definition of Europe is as follows: Albania Algeria Armenia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Belgium Bosnia & Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Georgia Germany Gibraltar Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Israel Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Macedonia Malta Moldova Montenegro Morocco Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russia in Europe Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Tunisia Turkey Ukraine United Kingdom For the purpose of this fare, Europe can be considered as one country. Note: For the purpose of this fare, flights between Russia in Europe and Russia in Asia are considered intercontinental sectors. Russia in Europe (RU), Russian cities to the West of the Ural Mountains. RU cities are: AAQ/AER/ASF/BZK/EGO/GOJ/IAR/KGD/KLF/KRR/KUF/KZN/LED/LPK/MMK/MOW/MRV/NBC/ OGZ/PEE/PES/PEZ/ROV/SKX/STW/UFA/VOG/VOZ Russia in Asia (XU), Russian cities to the East of the Ural Mountains.
[Show full text]
Economic Instruments for Reducing Aircraft Noise Theoretical Framework
European LCCs going hybrid: An empirical survey Roland Conrady, Frank Fichert and Richard Klophaus Worms University of Applied Sciences, Germany Competence Center Aviation Management (CCAM) Airneth Annual Conference The Hague, April 14, 2011 Agenda • Motivation/Background • Textbook definition of pure/archetypical LCC • Data for empirical survey • Empirical results: Classification of airline’s business models • Conclusions/discussion Roland Conrady, Frank Fichert, Richard Klophaus – European LCCs going hybrid – The Hague, April 14, 2011 2 Motivation / Background • Significant (and still growing) market share of LCCs in Europe. • Obviously different strategies within the LCC segment. • Market observers see trends towards “hybridization” and/or “converging business models”,e.g.: “On many fronts - pricing, product offering, distribution, fleet, network design and even cost structure - the previously obvious and often blatant differences between budget and legacy carriers are now no longer so apparent. This has resulted from the movement of both parties in the same direction, toward the mainstream middle.” Airline Business, May 2009 (emphasis added). Roland Conrady, Frank Fichert, Richard Klophaus – European LCCs going hybrid - The Hague, April 14, 2011 3 Motivation / Background • Dynamic market environment with recent changes, e.g. some LCCs offering transfer flights or can be booked via GDS. • Yet, very limited empirical analysis of “hybridization”. Roland Conrady, Frank Fichert, Richard Klophaus – European LCCs going hybrid - The Hague, April 14, 2011 4 Aim of the paper It is examined • to what extent carriers today blend low-cost characteristics with the business characteristics of traditional full-service airlines, and • which characteristics remain distinct between LCCs and traditional full-service airlines and which tend to be common for all carriers.
[Show full text]
British Airways Response
From: British Airways Customer Relations <[email protected]> Date: 17 April 2015 at 10:49 Subject: Your Response from BA Customer Relations To: [email protected] **Please DO NOT reply directly to this email by using the ‘reply’ function on your personal email settings, as it WILL NOT be received. If you wish to send us a reply please use the link at the bottom of the email** Dear Mr Dial Thank you for your letter dated 26 March addressed to Silla Maizey and the Executive Chairman, Keith Williams about been downgraded on flight BA0191 on 13 March. Keith has asked me to reply to you on his behalf and so this is not a standard email. I apologise on behalf of British Airways for not contacting you proactively about this matter and for the delay in my personal response. I see from your booking that you purchased the ticket to Austin on 04 November 2014 through you travel agent Opodo. I completely understand your frustration at booking this ticket so far in advance and arriving at the airport to find you've been downgraded from the Club World cabin. I hope our staff explained that there are occasions where our customers make a booking and then don’t turn up for their flight. We, along with other airlines, have an overbooking policy, which helps us avoid flying with empty seats and means we can keep the cost of our fares down. Ultimately this means we can fly a lot more passengers to their destinations. We collect data about how many people don’t turn up for each flight and we use this information to tell us if we should book more passengers than there are seats.
[Show full text]
British Airways Worldwide Timetable 28 October 2007 to 29 March 2008
British Airways Worldwide Timetable 28 October 2007 to 29 March 2008 CONTENTS About the schedules 2 British Airways extended network 3 Well being 4 How to use this Timetable 5 Terminal 5 / Abbreviations 6 Schedules pages 7/99 General information for the passenger - Our liability 100 - At the Airport 101 - How to prepare your baggage 102/103 - On the flight 104 How to contact us 105/106 Calendar 2007/08 107 Electronic Ticketing The carriage of all passengers and baggage is subject to the British Airways Conditions of Contract and General Conditions of Carriage regardless of whether the passenger holds an electronic ticket or a paper ticket. Further information can be found on page 100. 1 ABOUT THE SCHEDULES The flights contained in this timetable are based on an average period and subject to change for a variety of reasons. Seasonal holidays may result in some cancellations. Schedules may also vary around public holidays or when changes occur to Daylight Saving Time. Schedules are updated frequently on the Internet and can be found at ba.com Downloadable timetables, updated monthly, are available for PC and a variety of PDA devices and can be found on ba.com/mobilezone Connections Minimum connection times between flights vary by airport, often depending upon whether it is domestic to domestic, international to international, international to domestic or vice versa and whether a change of terminal is involved. For information on connections please refer to ba.com. Check In Online Check-in is a simple and convenient service that enables you to check in, choose your preferred seat and print your boarding pass (selected routes only) all from the comfort of your own home or office.
[Show full text]
Airline Alliances
AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2011 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Open Skies • 1992 - the United States concluded the first second generation “open skies” agreement with the Netherlands. It allowed KLM and any other Dutch carrier to fly to any point in the United States, and allowed U.S. carriers to fly to any point in the Netherlands, a country about the size of West Virginia. The U.S. was ideologically wedded to open markets, so the imbalance in traffic rights was of no concern. Moreover, opening up the Netherlands would allow KLM to drain traffic from surrounding airline networks, which would eventually encourage the surrounding airlines to ask their governments to sign “open skies” bilateral with the United States. • 1993 - the U.S. conferred antitrust immunity on the Wings Alliance between Northwest Airlines and KLM. The encirclement policy began to corrode resistance to liberalization as the sixth freedom traffic drain began to grow; soon Lufthansa, then Air France, were asking their governments to sign liberal bilaterals. • 1996 - Germany fell, followed by the Czech Republic, Italy, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Malta, Poland. • 2001- the United States had concluded bilateral open skies agreements with 52 nations and concluded its first multilateral open skies agreement with Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore. • 2002 – France fell. • 2007 - The U.S. and E.U. concluded a multilateral “open skies” traffic agreement that liberalized everything but foreign ownership and cabotage. • 2011 – cumulatively, the U.S. had signed “open skies” bilaterals with more than100 States. Multilateral and Bilateral Air Transport Agreements • Section 5 of the Transit Agreement, and Section 6 of the Transport Agreement, provide: “Each contracting State reserves the right to withhold or revoke a certificate or permit to an air transport enterprise of another State in any case where it is not satisfied that substantial ownership and effective control are vested in nationals of a contracting State .
[Show full text]
(First Chamber) 17 December 2003 * in Case T-219/99, British Airways
BRITISH AIRWAYS v COMMISSION JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (First Chamber) 17 December 2003 * In Case T-219/99, British Airways pic, established in Waterside (United Kingdom), represented by W. Allan and O. Black, solicitors, W. Wood and H. Davies, barristers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, applicant, v Commission of the European Communities, represented by M. Erhart, acting as Agent, and A. Barav, barrister, with an address for service in Luxembourg, defendant, • Language (if the case: English. II - 5925 JUDGMENT OF 17. 12. 2003 — CASE T-219/99 supported by Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd, established in Crawley (United Kingdom), represented by P. Binetter, solicitor, N. Green and C. West, barristers, intervener, APPLICATION for the annulment under Article 230 EC of Commission Decision 2000/74/EC of 14 July 1999 relating to a proceeding under Article 82 of the EC Treaty (IV/D-2/34.780 — Virgin/British Airways) (OJ 2000 L 30, p. 1), THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (First Chamber), composed of: B. Vesterdorf, President, M. Jaeger and H. Legal, Judges, Registrar: J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 26 February 2003, II - 5926 BRITISH AIRWAYS v COMMISSION gives the following Judgment Background to the dispute 1 According to the first recital in the preamble to Commission Decision 2000/74/EC of 14 July 1999 relating to a proceeding under Article 82 of the EC Treaty (IV/D-2/34.780 — Virgin/British Airways) (OJ 2000 L 30, p. 1; 'the contested decision'), British Airways pic ('BA') is the largest British airline company.
[Show full text]
Neil Cloughley, Managing Director, Faradair Aerospace
Introduction to Faradair® Linking cities via Hybrid flight ® faradair Neil Cloughley Founder & Managing Director Faradair Aerospace Limited • In the next 15 years it is forecast that 60% of the Worlds population will ® live in cities • Land based transportation networks are already at capacity with rising prices • The next transportation revolution faradair will operate in the skies – it has to! However THREE problems MUST be solved to enable this market; • Noise • Cost of Operations • Emissions But don’t we have aircraft already? A2B Airways, AB Airlines, Aberdeen Airways, Aberdeen Airways, Aberdeen London Express, ACE Freighters, ACE Scotland, Air 2000, Air Anglia, Air Atlanta Europe, Air Belfast, Air Bridge Carriers, Air Bristol, Air Caledonian, Air Cavrel, Air Charter, Air Commerce, Air Commuter, Air Contractors, Air Condor, Air Contractors, Air Cordial, Air Couriers, Air Ecosse, Air Enterprises, Air Europe, Air Europe Express, Air Faisal, Air Ferry, Air Foyle HeavyLift, Air Freight, Air Gregory, Air International (airlines) Air Kent, Air Kilroe, Air Kruise, Air Links, Air Luton, Air Manchester, Air Safaris, Air Sarnia, Air Scandic, Air Scotland, Air Southwest, Air Sylhet, Air Transport Charter, AirUK, Air UK Leisure, Air Ulster, Air Wales, Aircraft Transport and Travel, Airflight, Airspan Travel, Airtours, Airfreight Express, Airways International, Airwork Limited, Airworld Alderney, Air Ferries, Alidair, All Cargo, All Leisure, Allied Airways, Alpha One Airways, Ambassador Airways, Amber Airways, Amberair, Anglo Cargo, Aquila Airways,
[Show full text]
STRENGTHENING International Airlines Group
INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES GROUP ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2013 STRENGTHENING International Airlines Group 2013 Annual Report and Accounts WorldReginfo - 934e378d-e49b-4677-aa26-426a76bd662c Three years after our creation, International Airlines Group (IAG) has continued to STRENGTHEN its position. REVENUE OPERATING PROFIT (before exceptional items) +6.2% at constant €770m currency up €793m 1,000 5 7 20,000 770 18,67 18,11 8 600 485 16,339 14,79 15,000 5 22 13,456 200 3 -910 0 -2 10,000 -200 5,000 -600 0 -1,000 ‘09‘10 ‘11‘12 ‘13 ‘09‘10 ‘11‘12 ‘13 NON-FUEL UNIT COSTS PRODUCTIVITY LOAD FACTOR PASSENGER UNIT REVENUE -2.7% +4.3% +0.5 points +3.7% at constant at constant currency currency This is a measure of how This measures the amount The number of revenue Passenger revenue we manage costs, which of capacity (ASKs) that passenger kilometres flown divided by capacity to a large extent are our employees deliver expressed as a percentage (ASKs). This reflects both under our control. It is on average each year of the number of available the changes in prices we total non-fuel costs divided (ASKs divided by average seat kilometres flown. charge and the change by capacity (Available Seat number of employees). in volume of our sales. Kilometres ‘ASKs’). WorldReginfo - 934e378d-e49b-4677-aa26-426a76bd662c Group overview Governance Financial overview Financial statements Additional information Table of contents 2 Strengthening Financial overview 76 Operating and market environment Group overview 78 Financial review Introduction 88 Risk management and
[Show full text]
Analysis of Global Airline Alliances As a Strategy for International Network Development by Antonio Tugores-García
Analysis of Global Airline Alliances as a Strategy for International Network Development by Antonio Tugores-García M.S., Civil Engineering, Enginyer de Camins, Canals i Ports Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2008 Submitted to the MIT Engineering Systems Division and the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Science in Technology and Policy and Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2012 © 2012 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved Signature of Author__________________________________________________________________________________ Antonio Tugores-García Department of Engineering Systems Division Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics May 14, 2012 Certified by___________________________________________________________________________________________ Peter P. Belobaba Principal Research Scientist, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by__________________________________________________________________________________________ Joel P. Clark Professor of Material Systems and Engineering Systems Acting Director, Technology and Policy Program Accepted by___________________________________________________________________________________________ Eytan H. Modiano Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair, Graduate Program Committee 1 2 Analysis of Global Airline Alliances as a Strategy for International Network Development by Antonio Tugores-García
[Show full text]
March 31, 2010 COST SAVINGS COUNTER REVENUE DECLINE
PRELIMINARY RESULTS ANNOUNCEMENT Year April 1, 2009 – March 31, 2010 COST SAVINGS COUNTER REVENUE DECLINE British Airways today (May 21) presented its preliminary results for the 12 months ended March 31, 2010. Period highlights: • Operating loss of £231 million, including restructuring of £85 million (2009: £220 million including restructuring of £78 million) • Quarter 4 operating loss of £145 million (2009: £309 million) • Loss before tax of £531 million (2009: £401 million) • Revenue down £1 billion to £7,994 million (2009: £8,992 million) • Full year fuel costs down £597 million • Other operating costs down £390 million • Underlying unit costs down 10.8 per cent British Airways’ chief executive Willie Walsh, said: “Despite a £1 billion drop in revenue during the year, our determined efforts on cost control mean that costs have reduced at a comparable level and our operating loss is virtually the same as in the previous year. To be in the midst of the biggest economic downturn in 60 years and produce the same operating figure as last year shows the hard work that has been put into steering our business through the recession. Total costs are down by almost £1 billion, comprising a £597 million reduction in fuel costs and a £390 million reduction in non-fuel costs. The cut in non-fuel costs has been achieved by the introduction of permanent structural change in the way that we work allied with capacity reductions and cuts in external spend. “Returning the business to profitability requires permanent change across the company and it’s disappointing that our cabin crew union fails to recognise that.
[Show full text]
2001/2002 Annual Report & Accounts
2001/2002 Annual Report & Accounts Key Results 2001-02 2000-01 Group results Turnover m down 10.1% 8,340 9,278 Operating (loss)/profit m n/m (110) 380 (Loss)/profit before taxation m n/m (200) 150 Attributable (loss)/profit for the year m n/m (142) 67 Equity shareholders’ funds m down 5.1% 2,207 2,325 Basic (loss)/earnings per share p n/m (13.2) 6.2 Key financial statistics Airline operations yield p/RPK up 4.7% 6.67 6.37 Operating margin % down 5.4 points (1.3) 4.1 Net debt/total capital ratio % up 1.5 points 66.0 64.5 Operating statistics Passengers carried group ’000 down 10.0% 40,004 44,462 Revenue passenger kilometres group m down 13.7% 106,270 123,197 Revenue tonne kilometres group m down 13.9% 14,632 16,987 Available tonne kilometres group m down 9.3% 22,848 25,196 Passenger load factor group % down 1.0 points 70.4 71.4 British Airways share price Key results 1 Group profit and loss account 21 Net (loss)/income under US GAAP 57 Statement from the Chairman 2 Balance sheets 22 Shareholders’ equity under US GAAP 59 St a t ement from the Chief Exec u t i v e 4 Group cash flow statement 23 Operating and financial statistics 60 Operating and financial review 5 Statement of total recognised gains Five year summaries 61 Board members, and leadership team 11 and losses 24 Aircraft fleet 63 Directors’ report 12 Reconciliation of movements Shareholder information 64 Remuneration report 16 in shareholders’ funds 24 Glossary IBC Directors’ remuneration and Summary statements in euro 25 share interests 17 Notes to the accounts 26 Statement of directors’ responsibilities 20 Principal investments 54 Report of the auditors to the members United States generally accepted accounting of British Airways Plc 20 principles (US GAAP) information 55 British Airways 01/02 Annual Report 1 Urgent reaction to the post-September crisis included moves to Chairman’s Statement re s u s c i t a t e the market with an innova t i v e range of special offers and in c e n t i v es.
[Show full text]