Parthenon East Metope XI: Herakles and the Gigantomachy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Fairfield University DigitalCommons@Fairfield Visual & Performing Arts Faculty Publications Visual & Performing Arts Department 1-1996 Parthenon East Metope XI: Herakles and the Gigantomachy Katherine Schwab Fairfield University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/visualandperformingarts- facultypubs Originally appears in American Journal of Archaeology. Copyright 1996 Archaeological Institute of America. Peer Reviewed Repository Citation Schwab, Katherine, "Parthenon East Metope XI: Herakles and the Gigantomachy" (1996). Visual & Performing Arts Faculty Publications. 5. https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/visualandperformingarts-facultypubs/5 Published Citation Schwab, Katherine. 1996. "Parthenon East Metope XI: Herakles and the Gigantomachy." AJA 100(1):81-90. This item has been accepted for inclusion in DigitalCommons@Fairfield by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Fairfield. It is brought to you by DigitalCommons@Fairfield with permission from the rights- holder(s) and is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses, you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Parthenon East Metope XI: Herakles and the Gigantomachy KATHERINE A. SCHWAB Abstract tected, even though all of the metopes are extant, Parthenon East Metope XI, one of two metopes with since their state of preservation is poor, having three in the has been one of the figures composition, suffered considerable damage when the temple was most problematic in the east series. C. Praschniker,in converted to a church in the Early Christian era.3 his study of the east metopes in 1928, was the first to The of in each 1.21 m propose Heraklesas the centralfigure. Subsequent schol- groups figures composition, ars have challenged this identification, suggesting in- in height and carved in high relief, were chopped stead Apollo, Ares, or Hephaistos. A comparison with and gouged from the surface. This deliberate destruc- of the on vases of the representations Gigantomachy tion has left a complex and sometimes enigmatic fifth Herakles for the central century B.C.supports fig- surface with contour lines some ure in East An examination of casts of the partially defining XI. plaster of the metope in Basel and in Athens provides evidence to figures. reconstruct the figure equipped with a large bow in Praschniker's thorough knowledge of published his outstretched left hand and the position of his right vases of the time, and his use of vase painting ico- foot. The new evidence for the and attributes pose nography for comparative purposes, enabled him further supports the identification of the central figure to offer reconstruction drawings for each composi- as Herakles. Correlations to another three-figure com- tion that have served as the fundamental for position in the east metopes, as well as placement on images the facade and alignment with the ground plan of the the east metopes ever since. E. Brommer's systematic temple, underscore the important role given to Hera- description, interpretation, and photographic doc- kles in this representation of the battle of the gods umentation have become essential as the corrosive and giants.* effects of air pollution have increasingly eroded ex- tant sculptural details. The first major study of the Parthenon east met- The continuing debate concerning the middle opes, including the reconstruction of the composi- figure in East XI has prompted my renewed study tions and the identification of the figures and their of the composition (fig. 1). In a careful examination interpretation, was conducted by C. Praschniker in of the casts in Basel and Athens I have found the 1928.1 A. Michaelis had already established the upper half of a bow in the top right-hand corner theme of the 14 east metopes as the battle of the of the metope, which one can see mostly concealed gods and giants, after recognizing Dionysos accom- by the shadow from the triglyph in the Basel pub- panied by a snake attacking a fleeing figure in East lication.4 I have also found the right foot of the cen- II.2 It is remarkable that any theme could be de- tral figure. * An earlier version of this paper was presented at the for generous access to the Skulpturhalleand for their com- 94th Annual Meeting of the Archaeological Institute of ments on early stages of my drawingsand interpretations. America in New Orleans, December 1992 (AJA97 [1993] My thanks are also due to R. Davidson and the anonymous 310, abstract).Funding was provided by Fairfield Univer- AJAreviewers for their helpful criticisms and suggestions. sity to support my research in Athens and Basel. In Athens The following abbreviations have been used: I wish to thank the Ephor of the Acropolis, Peter Kalligas, Berger E. Berger, Dokumentation zu den Meto- for permission to study the plaster casts of the east met- pen des Parthenon. Studien der Skulp- opes in the Center for the Acropolis at Athens. I also wish turhalle Basel (Mainz 1986). to thank Alexander Mantis, Curator of Antiquities of the Brommer E Brommer, Die Metopen des Parthe- Acropolis Museum, for his generous assistance in arrang- non (Mainz 1967). ing for me to study the casts, and for his comments and Praschniker C. Praschniker, Parthenonstudien observationsin numerous discussions concerning the casts (Vienna 1928). 1 of the east metopes. I thank Aileen Ajootian, Robert Praschniker. His study includes the north and east Bridges, Evelyn Harrison, Caroline Houser, and Christina metopes of the Parthenon. Salowey for discussing my research at various stages and 2 A. Michaelis, Der Parthenon (Leipzig 1870-1871) 143. offering helpful observations, suggestions, and encourage- 3 The temple was converted to a Christian church dur- ment. I also thank Manolis Korres for discussing with me ing the reign of the emperor Justinian, and it is at this his discoveries in the composition of East Metope XIV. time that most figures in the metopes were damaged. In Basel I wish to thank Ernst Berger and MargotSchmidt 4 Berger pl. 64. 81 American Journal of Archaeology 100 (1996) 81-90 82 KATHERINE A. SCHWAB [AJA 100 Fig. 1. Cast of metope East XI, Basel, Skulpturhalle. (Berger pl. 64, Photo D. Widmer) METHOD thanks to M. Korres, who found evidence for the pres- My study of Parthenon East Metope XI, the most ence of four, not two, horses pulling the chariot of problematic metope of the east series, has been based Helios above Okeanos in East XIV.6 The outermost on plaster casts and a comparison of the Giganto- horse would have projected beyond the metope floor, machy in the compositions from the east metopes thus giving us a spectacular quadriga prominently with those on vases of the fifth century B.C. From displayed at the right end of the series. Such a dis- these results and a synthesis of the drawings pub- covery makes it more than likely that the other com- lished by Praschniker and the photographs published positions were potentially as complex in the arrange- by Brommer, I have developed a drawing system, ment of dueling figures and chariot groups. The using Praschniker's line drawing as the basis, that addition of bronze attachments, particularly wea- attempts to show where the carved surface is pre- ponry, and paint for details such as hair, eyes, lips, served with a sharp black contour and added shad- drapery, and the possibility of red for the background ing to suggest volume (fig. 2). Where the contour is plane all would have contributed to a dynamic bat- not extant or is at best merely suggested, light shad- tle between the Olympian gods and the Earth-born ing is used. The resulting drawing is intended to give giants on the east facade of the Parthenon. one a greater sense of the three-dimensionality of Most of Praschniker's identifications for the figures the original composition than one perhaps sees in in the east metopes have been accepted by scholars Praschniker's drawing of the metope composition in subsequent studies. Some of these identifications (fig. 3). The new drawing provides an opportunity have been challenged, however, including the most to incorporate details visible in Brommer's photo- badly damaged figure in metope East XI, the central graphs, E. Berger's publication of the Basel casts, and figure. Unlike the majority of compositions in the my discoveries and observations from studying the east series, East XI has three figures instead of two. casts in Basel and Athens.5 Only one other metope has three figures, East IV, The complexity of the original composition in at to which we will return. Praschniker associated Her- least some of the east metopes is now indicated, akles with the central figure in East XI, accompa- 5 See G.B. Waywell'sreview of Berger in Gnomon60 6M. Korres, "Acropole, travaux de restauration du (1988) 57-60. Parthenon,"BCH 115 (1991) 839. 1996] PARTHENON EAST METOPE XI 83 Fig. 2. Drawing of metope East XI. (K.A. Schwab) nied by Eros at left, another archer, in the defeat of a falling giant at right.7 Brommer disagreed with Praschniker, preferring instead to see the mortal hero in East IX as the fleeing figure at left rather than a giant, while proposing Apollo as the principal figure in East XI.8 Herakles, however, never appears in a defensive posture during the Gigantomachy on vases where he is clearly recognizable. Instead, he is consistently shown as an aggressive archer fighting alongside the Olympians. Placing Herakles in East IX as the fleeing figure is most doubtful.