DOCSLIB.ORG

PRPP/SSC Compendium Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PRPP/SSC Compendium Report GIF/PRPPWG/2011/002 Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection of the Six Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems July 15, 2011 Prepared Jointly by: The Proliferation Resistance and Physical Protection Evaluation Methodology Working Group and the System Steering Committees of the Generation IV International Forum (This page has been intentionally left blank.) ii CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................... vii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 2 PART I General Overview ........................................................................................................................... 3 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Objectives ..................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Scope ............................................................................................................................................ 6 2. How the Report Was Prepared ............................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Workshops .................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Production of White Papers .......................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Drafting of the Report ................................................................................................................... 9 3. Cross-cutting Topics ............................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Fuel Type ...................................................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Coolant, Moderator ..................................................................................................................... 10 3.3 Refueling Modes ......................................................................................................................... 10 3.4 Fuel Cycle Architectures ............................................................................................................. 11 3.5 Safeguards Topics ...................................................................................................................... 13 3.6 Other GIF Cross-cutting Topics .................................................................................................. 14 3.6.1 Safety ............................................................................................................................. 15 3.6.2 Economics ...................................................................................................................... 17 4. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 18 4.1 Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 18 4.2 Next Steps .................................................................................................................................. 18 APPENDIX A ............................................................................................................................................... 20 PART II System White Papers .................................................................................................................. 27 Very High-Temperature Reactor (VHTR) .................................................................................................... 29 1. Overview of Technology ............................................................................................................. 29 2. Overview of Fuel Cycle(s) ........................................................................................................... 34 3. PR&PP Relevant System Elements and Potential Adversary Targets ....................................... 35 4. Proliferation Resistance Considerations Incorporated into Design ............................................ 37 5. Physical Protection Considerations Incorporated into Design .................................................... 38 6. PR&PP Issues, Concerns and Benefits ...................................................................................... 39 7. References ................................................................................................................................. 39 Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor (SFR) ............................................................................................................ 45 1. Overview of Technology ............................................................................................................. 45 2. Overview of Fuel Cycle(s)........................................................................................................... 51 3. PR&PP Relevant System Elements and Potential Adversary Targets ...................................... 53 4. Proliferation Resistance Considerations Incorporated into Design ............................................ 54 5. Physical Protection Considerations Incorporated into Design .................................................... 55 iii 6. PR&PP Issues, Concerns and Benefits ...................................................................................... 56 7. References ................................................................................................................................. 57 Super Critical Water Reactor (SCWR) ........................................................................................................ 59 1. Overview of Technology ............................................................................................................. 59 2. Overview of Fuel Cycle(s) ........................................................................................................... 63 3. PR&PP Relevant System Elements and Potential Adversary Targets ....................................... 63 4. Proliferation Resistance Considerations Incorporated into Design ............................................ 64 5. Physical Protection Considerations Incorporated into Design .................................................... 65 6. PR&PP Issues, Concerns and Benefits ...................................................................................... 66 7. References .................................................................................................................................. 67 Gas-cooled Fast Reactor (GFR) ................................................................................................................. 69 1. Overview of Technology ............................................................................................................. 69 2. Overview of Fuel Cycle(s) ........................................................................................................... 73 3. PR&PP Relevant System Elements and Potential Adversary Targets ....................................... 75 4. Proliferation Resistance Considerations Incorporated into Design ............................................ 76 5. Physical Protection Considerations Incorporated into Design .................................................... 77 6. PR&PP Issues, Concerns and Benefits ...................................................................................... 78 7. References .................................................................................................................................. 79 Lead-cooled Fast Reactor (LFR) ................................................................................................................ 81 1. Overview of Technology ............................................................................................................. 81 2. Overview of Fuel Cycle(s) ........................................................................................................... 87 3. PR&PP Relevant System Elements and Potential Adversary Targets ...................................... 88 4. Proliferation Resistance Considerations Incorporated into Design ............................................ 89 5. Physical Protection Considerations Incorporated into Design .................................................... 91 6. PR&PP Issues, Concerns and Benefits ...................................................................................... 93 7. References .................................................................................................................................. 94 Molten Salt Reactor (MSR) ....................................................................................................................... 103 1. Overview of Technology ........................................................................................................... 103 2. Overview of fuel
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Electronuclear Conversion of Fertile to Fissile Material
    UCRL-52144 THE ELECTRONUCLEAR CONVERSION OF FERTILE TO FISSILE MATERIAL C. M. Van Atta J. D. Lee H. Heckrotto October 11, 1976 Prepared for U.S. Energy Research & Development Administration under contract No. W-7405-Eng-48 II\M LAWRENCE lUg LIVERMORE k^tf LABORATORY UnrmsilyotCatftxna/lJvofmofe s$ PC DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENmmT IS UMUMWTED NOTICE Thii npoit WM prepared w u account of wot* •pomond by UM Uiilttd Stalwi GovcmiMM. Nittim Uw United Stain nor the United Statn Energy tUwardi it Development AdrnWrtrtUon, not «y of thei* employee!, nor any of their contricton, •ubcontrecton, or their employe*!, makti any warranty, expreai « Implied, or muMi any toga) liability oc reeponafctUty for the accuracy, completenni or uMfulntat of uy Information, apperatui, product or proem dlecloead, or repreienl. that tu UM would not *nfrkig» prrrtt*)}MWiwd r%hl». NOTICE Reference to a oompmy or product rum don not imply approval or nconm ndatjon of the product by the Untnrtity of California or the US. Energy Research A Devetopnient Administration to the uchvton of others that may be suitable. Printed In the United Stitei or America Available from National Technical Information Service U.S. Department of Commerce 528S Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Price: Printed Copy S : Microfiche $2.25 DMimtic P»t» Ranflt PHca *•#» Rtnft MM 001-025 $ 3.50 326-350 10.00 026-050 4.00 351-375 10.50 051-075 4.50 376-400 10.75 076-100 5.00 401-425 11.00 101-125 5.50 426-450 31.75 126-150 6.00 451-475 12.00 151-175 6.75 476-500 12.50 176-200 7.50 501-525 12.75 201-225 7.75 526-550 13.00 526-250 8.00 551-575 13.50 251-275 9.00 576-600 I3.7S 276-300 9.25 601 -up 301-325 9.75 *Ml J2.50 fot «ch iddltlOMl 100 pip tacmitMt from 601 ID 1,000 flfcK IM 54.50 for eicli iMUknal I0O plfe feenmMI om 1,000 p*o.
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Cycle Flexibility in CANDU P.G
    IAEA-SM-353-5P Fuel Cycle Flexibility in CANDU P.G. Boczar XA9949933 Director, Fuel and Fuel Cycle Division, AECL Chalk River Laboratories, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada No single fuel-cycle path is appropriate for all countries. Many local and global factors will affect the best strategy for an individual country. Fuel-cycle flexibility is an important factor in an ever-changing, and unpredictable world. CANDU is an evolutionary reactor, offering a custom fuel cycle to fit local requirements. Its unsurpassed fuel-cycle flexibility can accommodate the widest range of fuel-cycle options in existing CANDU stations. In the short term, the CANFLEX® bundle is nearing power reactor implementation. The demonstration irradiation of 26 bundles in the Pt. Lepreau power station in New Brunswick, Canada, started this September, and a water-CHF test will take place later this year that will confirm the improvement in thermalhydraulic performance. CANFLEX provides enhanced operating and safety performance through a reduction in peak linear element ratings, and a significant increase in critical channel power. CANFLEX will be the near-term carrier of advanced fuel cycles. While natural uranium fuel provides outstanding advantages, the use of slightly enriched uranium (SEU) in CANDU offers even lower fuel cycle costs and other potential benefits, such as uprating capability through flattening the radial channel power distribution. Recycled uranium (RU) from reprocessing spent PWR fuel is a subset of SEU that has significant economic promise. The use of SEU/RU is the first logical step from natural uranium in CANDU. For countries having LWR reactors, the ability to use low-fissile material in CANDU reactors offers a range of unique synergistic fuel cycle opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Reactors with Innovative Fuels
    Nuclear Science Advanced Reactors with Innovative Fuels Workshop Proceedings Villigen, Switzerland 21-23 October 1998 NUCLEAR•ENERGY•AGENCY OECD, 1999. Software: 1987-1996, Acrobat is a trademark of ADOBE. All rights reserved. OECD grants you the right to use one copy of this Program for your personal use only. Unauthorised reproduction, lending, hiring, transmission or distribution of any data or software is prohibited. You must treat the Program and associated materials and any elements thereof like any other copyrighted material. All requests should be made to: Head of Publications Service, OECD Publications Service, 2, rue AndrÂe-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. OECD PROCEEDINGS Proceedings of the Workshop on Advanced Reactors with Innovative Fuels hosted by Villigen, Switzerland 21-23 October 1998 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: − to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; − to contribute to sound economic expansion in Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and − to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original Member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • NPR81: South Korea's Shifting and Controversial Interest in Spent Fuel
    JUNGMIN KANG & H.A. FEIVESON Viewpoint South Korea’s Shifting and Controversial Interest in Spent Fuel Reprocessing JUNGMIN KANG & H.A. FEIVESON1 Dr. Jungmin Kang was a Visiting Research Fellow at the Center for Energy and Environmental Studies (CEES), Princeton University in 1999-2000. He is the author of forthcoming articles in Science & Global Security and Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. Dr. H.A. Feiveson is a Senior Research Scientist at CEES and a Co- director of Princeton’s research Program on Nuclear Policy Alternatives. He is the Editor of Science and Global Security, editor and co-author of The Nuclear Turning Point: A Blueprint for Deep Cuts and De-alerting of Nuclear Weapons (Brookings Institution, 1999), and co-author of Ending the Threat of Nuclear Attack (Stanford University Center for International Security and Arms Control, 1997). rom the beginning of its nuclear power program could reduce dependence on imported uranium. During in the 1970s, the Republic of Korea (South Ko- the 1990s, the South Korean government remained con- Frea) has been intermittently interested in the cerned about energy security but also began to see re- reprocessing of nuclear-power spent fuel. Such repro- processing as a way to address South Korea’s spent fuel cessing would typically separate the spent fuel into three disposal problem. Throughout this entire period, the constituent components: the unfissioned uranium re- United States consistently and effectively opposed all maining in the spent fuel, the plutonium produced dur- reprocessing initiatives on nonproliferation grounds. We ing reactor operation, and the highly radioactive fission review South Korea’s evolving interest in spent fuel re- products and transuranics other than plutonium.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NEXT GENERATION CANDU 6 J.M. HOPWOOD XA0053559 Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
    IAEA-SM-353/29 THE NEXT GENERATION CANDU 6 illinium J.M. HOPWOOD XA0053559 Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada Abstract AECL's product line of CANDU 6 and CANDU 9 nuclear power plants are adapted to respond to chang- ing market conditions, experience feedback and technological development by a continuous improvement process of design evolution. The CANDU 6 Nuclear Power Plant design is a successful family of nuclear units, with the first four units entering service in 1983, and the most recent entering service this year. A further four CANDU 6 units are under construction. Starting in 1996, a focused forward-looking development program is under way at AECL to incorporate a series of individual improvements and integrate them into the CANDU 6, leading to the evolutionary development of the next-generation enhanced CANDU 6. The CANDU 6 improvements program includes all aspects of an NPP project, including engineering tools improvements, design for improved constructability, scheduling for faster, more streamlined commissioning, and improved operating performance. This enhanced CANDU 6 product will combine the benefits of design provenness (drawing on the more than 70 reactor-years experience of the seven operating CANDU 6 units), with the advantages of an evolutionary next- generation design. Features of the enhanced CANDU 6 design include: • Advanced Human Machine Interface - built around the Advanced CANDU Control Centre. • Advanced fuel design - using the newly demonstrated CANFLEX fuel bundle. • Improved Efficiency based on improved utilization of waste heat. • Streamlined System Design - including simplifications to improve performance and safety system reliability. • Advanced Engineering Tools, - featuring linked electronic databases from 3D CADDS, equipment specifi- cation and material management.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundant Thorium As an Alternative Nuclear Fuel Important Waste Disposal and Weapon Proliferation Advantages
    Energy Policy 60 (2013) 4–12 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Energy Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol Abundant thorium as an alternative nuclear fuel Important waste disposal and weapon proliferation advantages Marvin Baker Schaffer n RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90407, United States HIGHLIGHTS Thorium is an abundant nuclear fuel that is well suited to three advanced reactor configurations. Important thorium reactor configurations include molten salt, CANDU, and TRISO systems. Thorium has important nuclear waste disposal advantages relative to pressurized water reactors. Thorium as a nuclear fuel has important advantages relative to weapon non-proliferation. article info abstract Article history: It has long been known that thorium-232 is a fertile radioactive material that can produce energy in Received 10 May 2012 nuclear reactors for conversion to electricity. Thorium-232 is well suited to a variety of reactor types Accepted 26 April 2013 including molten fluoride salt designs, heavy water CANDU configurations, and helium-cooled TRISO- Available online 30 May 2013 fueled systems. Keywords:: Among contentious commercial nuclear power issues are the questions of what to do with long-lived Thorium radioactive waste and how to minimize weapon proliferation dangers. The substitution of thorium for Non-proliferation uranium as fuel in nuclear reactors has significant potential for minimizing both problems. Nuclear waste reduction Thorium is three times more abundant in nature than uranium. Whereas uranium has to be imported, there is enough thorium in the United States alone to provide adequate grid power for many centuries. A well-designed thorium reactor could produce electricity less expensively than a next-generation coal- fired plant or a current-generation uranium-fueled nuclear reactor.
    [Show full text]
  • Candu Fuel-Cycle Vision Xa9953247
    CANDU FUEL-CYCLE VISION XA9953247 P.G. BOCZAR Fuel and Fuel Cycle Division, Chalk River Laboratories, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada Abstract The fuel-cycle path chosen by a particular country will depend on a range of local and global factors. The CANDU® reactor provides the fuel-cycle flexibility to enable any country to optimize its fuel-cycle strategy to suit its own needs. AECL has developed the CANFLEX® fuel bundle as the near-term carrier of advanced fuel cycles. A demonstration irradiation of 24 CANFLEX bundles in the Point Lepreau power station, and a full-scale critical heat flux (CHF) test in water are planned in 1998, before commercial implementation of CANFLEX fuelling. CANFLEX fuel provides a reduction in peak linear element ratings, and a significant enhancement in thermalhydraulic performance. Whereas natural uranium fuel provides many advantages, the use of slightly enriched uranium (SEU) in CANDU reactors offers even lower fuel-cycle costs and other benefits, such as uprating capability through flattening the channel power distribution across the core. Recycled uranium (RU) from reprocessing spent PWR fuel is a subset of SEU that has significant economic promise. AECL views the use of SEU/RU in the CANFLEX bundle as the first logical step from natural uranium. High neutron economy enables the use of low-fissile fuel in CANDU reactors, which opens up a spectrum of unique fuel-cycle opportunities that exploit the synergism between CANDU reactors and LWRs. At one end of this spectrum is the use of materials from conventional reprocessing: CANDU reactors can utilize the RU directly without re-enrichment, the plutonium as conventional mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel, and the actinide waste mixed with plutonium in an inert-matrix carrier.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Safety Information Computational Center
    Radiation Safety Information Computational Center Oak Ridge National Laboratory POST OFFICE BOX 2008 OAK RIDGE, TENNESSEE 37831-6362 Managed by UT-Battelle, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 Phone No. 865-574-6176 FAX 865-574-6182 Internet: [email protected] http://www-rsicc.ornl.gov/rsic.html No. 448 June 2002 "The measure of a man's real character is what he would do if he knew he never would be found out." -- Thomas B. Macaulay Printable PDF file of this newsletter available at: http://www-rsicc.ornl.gov/NEWSLETTER.html. Azmy Elected as Fellow to ANS Congratulations to Dr. Yousry Azmy, ORNL, for being elected to Fellow Membership of the American Nuclear Society. The ANS is recognizing Dr. Azmy's contributions to the advancement of nuclear science and technology through the years. Dr. Azmy is a member of the Radiation Protection and Shielding Division and Mathematics and Computation Division. He will be honored at the Awards Luncheon June 11, in Hollywood, Florida. NOTICE RSICC will be offering a few data, processing, and computational tools free of handling, testing, and other fees associated with package transmittal. A ***NO FEE*** label will appear next to the package name on the web request page. The ability to provide these packages at no charge is due in part to advanced funding from the sponsors. To acquire these tools, follow the normal registration procedure for first-time or updated users. Then complete the WWW Request Form. The license and export control statements will need the user signatures, which is standard procedure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Partitioning and Transmutation on the Risk Assesment of a Spent Nuclear Fuel
    h/e/-se SE0608415 The Impact of Partitioning and Transmutation on the Risk Assesment of a Spent Nuclear Fuel Naima Amrani and Ahmed Boucenna UFAS University Physics Department Faculty of sciences Setif 19000 ALGERIA I. INTRODUCTION Nuclear power produces steadily a mass of spent fuel which contains a part from the short lived fission products, a significant amount of actinides and fission products with height toxicity and long half-lives. These nuclides constitute the long-term radiotoxic inventory which remains as a hazard far beyond human perception. The reprocessing recycles most of the major actinides (Uranium and Plutonium), while the Minor Actinides (MA) (mainly Neptunium: Np, Americium: Am and Curium: Cm) with half lives up to 2 million years remain with the fission products which are vitrified before being buried in deep repositories. Partitioning of the minor actinides and some of the fission products is an efficient method to reduce the long term radiotoxicity of the residual waste components with a factor proportional to the separation yield. The improved minor actinide nuclides would be recycled into a fuel cycle activities and returned to the reactor inventory of fissile and fertile material for transmutation to short lived isotopes. Progressively the MAs and some long-lived fission product (LLFP) could be burn up out. This option would reduce the long term contamination hazard in the high-level waste and shorten the time interval necessary to keep the actinides containing wastes confined in a deep geologic repository. Partitioning and Transmutation (P&T) is, in principal, capable of reducing the radiotoxicity period, while a number of practical difficult remain to be surmounted.
    [Show full text]
  • Tritium Resources Available for Fusion Reactors 1: Nuclear Energy Hervé Nifenecker
    PAPER Related content - Future electricity production methods. Part Tritium resources available for fusion reactors 1: Nuclear energy Hervé Nifenecker To cite this article: M. Kovari et al 2018 Nucl. Fusion 58 026010 - European DEMO design strategy and consequences for materials G. Federici, W. Biel, M.R. Gilbert et al. - Materials-related issues in the safety and licensing of nuclear fusion facilities View the article online for updates and enhancements. N. Taylor, B. Merrill, L. Cadwallader et al. This content was downloaded from IP address 194.81.223.66 on 23/03/2018 at 14:11 IOP Nuclear Fusion International Atomic Energy Agency Nuclear Fusion Nucl. Fusion Nucl. Fusion 58 (2018) 026010 (10pp) https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aa9d25 58 Tritium resources available for fusion 2018 reactors © 2017 EURATOM M. Kovari1, M. Coleman1,2, I. Cristescu3 and R. Smith1 NUFUAU 1 CCFE, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 3DB, United Kingdom 2 EUROfusion Consortium, Boltzmannstraße 2, 85748 Garching, Germany 3 Tritium Laboratory, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany 026010 E-mail: [email protected] M. Kovari et al Received 11 July 2017, revised 22 November 2017 Accepted for publication 24 November 2017 Published 21 December 2017 Abstract Printed in the UK The tritium required for ITER will be supplied from the CANDU production in Ontario, but while Ontario may be able to supply 8 kg for a DEMO fusion reactor in the mid-2050s, it will not be able to provide 10 kg at any realistic starting time. The tritium required to start DEMO NF will depend on advances in plasma fuelling efficiency, burnup fraction, and tritium processing technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Lwv/L' I .D N. V/./ \Qev
    Sept. 16, 1958 _ . I w, E, ABBOTT ETAL 2,852,460 FUEL-BREEDER FUEL ELEMENT FOR NUCLEAR REACTOR Filed Aug. 6, 1956 w//%////»;:/N \QE n.V////.//////////.Dv Lwv/l'I - ././4//. mm . 1M5.NLA TOT T T0 BY mm»/ /m m _ ATTORNEY , 2,852,460 United States Patent 0 . i Patented Sept. 16, 1958 1 23 power level, and in heterogeneous reactors this has been 2,852,460 ' set by the uranium temperature in the center of the rod._ To avoid this, and yet maintain a high ?ux, fuel elements FUEL-BREEDER FUEL ELEMENT FOR comprising a cluster of relatively small diameter uranium NUCLEAR REACTOR rods have been designed. However, this only aggravates William E. Abbott, East Pittsburgh, Pa., and Ralph fabricational and decontamination costs. Balent, Tarzana, Calif., assignors, by mesne assign An object of our invention, therefore, is to provide an ments, to the United States of America as represented improved fuel-breeder fuel element. .by the United States Atomic Energy Commission Another object is to provide a fuel-breeder fuel ele ment, wherein the fertile and ?ssionable materials are Application August 6, 1956, Serial No. 602,401 separated ‘and there is a minimum of cladding. 5 Claims. (Cl. 204-1931) Another object is to provide such a fuel element which permits fabrication and decontamination economies. Another object is to provide such a fuel element, where Our invention relates to an improved nuclear reactor 15 in a single, relatively large diameter fuel element is the fuel element, and more particularly to an improved fuel equivalent of a cluster of smaller diameter rods.
    [Show full text]
  • Enrichment Effects on Candu-Seu Spent Fuel Monte Carlo Shielding Analysis
    ENRICHMENT EFFECTS ON CANDU-SEU SPENT FUEL MONTE CARLO SHIELDING ANALYSIS CRISTINA ALICE MARGEANU, PETRE ILIE Institute for Nuclear Research Pitesti, [email protected]; [email protected] (Received June 22, 2005) Abstract: For CANDU type reactors, the most attractive solution trend in order to raise the discharge fuel burnup seems to be SEU and RU fuels utilization. The paper aims to study the effects induced by fuel enrichment variation on CANDU SEU spent fuel photon dose rates for a Monte Carlo shielding analysis. In order to obtain the spent fuel inventories and photon source profiles the ORIGEN-S code has been used. The shielding calculations have been performed by using the Monte Carlo MORSE-SGC code. Both codes are included in the ORNL’s SCALE 5 programs package. A comparison for different fuel enrichments has been performed regarding both spent fuel characteristics and photon dose rates. Key words: CANDU-SEU spent fuel, fuel enrichment, spent fuel transport, photon dose rate, shipping cask 1. INTRODUCTION The promises for higher nuclear fuel utilization have lead to advanced cycles development need, but all the problems associated with radioactive waste have generated an increase in the interest for these fuel cycles. Last decade, both for operating reactors and future reactor projects, a general trend to raise the discharge fuel burnup has been registered. The fuel burnup raise associated consequences are very important: spent fuel mass reduction for 1 MWh generated electric power; actinides mass significant reduction in the spent fuel; more rarely refueling, leading to impressing raises in installed capacity utilization; about 15%-35% reduction in costs associated with nuclear fuel, for 1 MWh generated electric power.
    [Show full text]