Israel and the OECD

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Israel and the OECD Shir Hever The Economy of the Occupation A Socioeconomic Bulletin Israel and the OECD № 26 * August 2010 Shir Hever Economy of the Occupation ___________________________________________Socioeconomic Bulletin № 26 Israel and the OECD ___________________________________________ August 2010 Published by the Alternative Information Center (AIC) http://www.alternativenews.org/ Jerusalem Beit Sahour 4 Queen Shlomzion Street Building 111 Main Street PO Box 31417 PO Box 201 Jerusalem, Israel 91313 Beit Sahour, Palestine Phone: 972-(0)2-624-1159; 624-1424 Phone: 972-(0)2-277-5444 Fax: 972-(0)2-625-3151 Fax: 972-(0)2-277-5445 Editor: Tania Kepler Graphic Designer: Tal Hever Printer: Latin Patriarchate Printing Press Cover: "Global Handshake" (left/right) Andrus Ansip, Prime Minister of Estonia; Felipe Larrain, Minister of Finance of Chile; Benjamin Netan- yahu, Prime Minister of Israel; Silvio Berlusconi, Prime Minister of Italy; Borut Pahor, Prime Minister of Slovenia and Angel Gurría, Secretary-General of the OECD at the OECD Conference Centre, Paris, France. Picture by Andrew Wheeler/OECD (27 May 2010). Some rights reserved: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed.en. This research was conducted with the assistance of Diakonia. The AIC further wishes to acknowledge the partnership of: Advocacy Project, Associazione Comunita Papa Giovanni XXIII, Ayuntamiento de Xixon through the help of Paz con Dignidad, the Basque government through the help of Mundubat, Broederlijk Delen, the Catalan Government through the help of Sodepau, Comite Catholique Contre La Faim Et Pour Le Developemment (CCFD), Diakonia, Gobierno de Espana—Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores y de Cooperacion through the help of Mundubat, Inter-Church Organisation for Development Cooperation (ICCO), the Irish Government through the help of Christian Aid and Junta Castilla-La Mancha through the help of ACSUR Las Segovias. Some rights received to The Alternative Information Center (AIC). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License (USév3.0): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Table of Contents Introduction 5 What is the OECD and What Does Israel Gain From Membership? 8 why israel does not make the grade: 1. Statistics and Borders 11 2. Economy 16 3. Education 23 4. Poverty 26 Why Did OECD Countries Not Object? 28 Lobby Efforts in Paris 30 Protest 32 Conclusion and Repercussions of Membership 33 Bibliography 35 Special thanks to Emir Richmond and to Tania Kepler for their editing contribution, and to Maria Chiara Rioli for her invaluable assistance in translation. Many thanks to the Boycott National Committee (BNC), Badil: Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee Rights and to Professor Karma Nabulsi for the information used in this publication. Israel and the OECD | 5 Introduction n 1993, Shimon Peres, then Is- voted against inviting Israel (Basok, raeli foreign minister, initiated 2010; OECD, 2010c: 3). IIsrael’s request to join the Organ- Although a group of Irish sena- isation for Economic Co-operation tors and parliament members signed and Development (OECD) (CIDSE, a petition appealing their government 2010). This was part of a strategy to vote no to Israel’s accession, Ireland adopted by Israel in 1990 to use the eventually voted yes (The Irish Times, Oslo Process as leverage to become 2010). The World Bank and the In- more integrated and positively viewed ternational Monetary Fund further in the international community. Is- raised three concerns regarding Israel’s rael initiated economic reform that acceptance in light of its treatment of was designed to make it more com- the Palestinian residents of the Occu- petitive in the international markets pied Palestinian Territories, concerns (Shalev, 2004), and has since become which were ignored: the blockade on one of the most globalized countries Gaza, the prevention of investment in in the world (KOF, 2010). In 1994 Area C of the West Bank and the lim- and again in 2000 Israel lost the vote itations on Palestinian foreign trade and was not accepted into the OECD (Jnews, 2010). (Martin, 2010). Additional protest was also made In 2007, the official process of ac- by Switzerland, Norway and Turkey ceptance into the OECD for Israel be- about accepting Israel as an occupy- gan, and no OECD member country ing power, although they all voted 6 | Economy of the Occupation in favor of Israel’s accession in the key points, essential to understanding end (Stein, 2010). the Israeli economy and which thus Israel was officially accepted into provide a partial and misleading pic- the OECD in May 2010, after all ture of the Israeli economy and soci- member states voted in favor of its ety. This is not to say that the reports accession (Lavie, 2010). Along with are not useful. They are, indeed, infor- Israel, Estonia and Slovania were mative, but often underestimate the also accepted into the OECD, bring- true meaning and impact of the deep ing the number of member states divisions within Israel’s stratified so- to 34 (Agencies, 2010). ciety, the political reality of Israel, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, The OECD reports on Israel paint the occupation of the Pal- a misleading picture of the Israeli estinian territories and the Syrian Golan, the repres- economy and society. sion of minority groups within Israel (especially The OECD published two reports the Palestinian minority) and the on Israel, reports meant to serve economic meaning of the unfulfilled both as a tool for OECD countries rights of the Palestinian refugees. to judge Israel’s readiness to join the Furthermore, the report did not organization, and also as a list of rec- address the possible repercussions of ommendations for the Israel govern- accepting Israel into the OECD on ment—which policies the OECD the other OECD members, especially recommends that Israel adopt in or- in light of Israel’s controversial poli- der to improve its economy, as well as cies, consistent violations of interna- increase its chances of being accept- tional law and rapidly declining inter- ed into the OECD (OECD, 2010a; national standing. OECD, 2010b). Although the OECD reports rele- These reports paint a detailed pic- gated secondary importance to Israel’s ture of the Israeli socioeconomic real- political situation, the Israeli discourse ity. However, the reports lack several regarding joining the OECD was fully Israel and the OECD | 7 cognisant that Israel’s international law, stood to gain from a vote of confi- standing, which is at constant risk due dence from the international commu- to occupation of the Palestinian ter- nity in the form of OECD member- ritories and violations of international ship (Oren, 2010). "Arrival of Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel to OECD Headquarters" Picture by Benjamin Renout/OECD (Paris, 27 May 2010). Some rights reserved: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed.en. 8 | Economy of the Occupation What is the OECD and What Does Israel Gain from Membership? he Organisation for Eco- as an “exclusive club” for developed de- nomic Cooperation and mocracies. Member states enjoy a cer- TDevelopment is a forum in tain prestige from their membership which 31 of the world’s most economi- in the organization and, importantly, cally advanced countries are members. are recognized as developed and stable The organization presents itself as a democracies by the international com- forum in which “democracies work to- munity. This prestige is sometimes gether to address the economic, social useful for governments and corpora- and environmental challenges of glo- tions seeking to raise capital and sell balization.” It was founded in 1961 bonds (Avriel, 2010a; Ben, 2010). on the foundations of the OEEC, the Although membership in the Or- U.S body for delivering aid to Europe ganization for Economic Cooperation through the Marshall Plan (Even et. and Development (OECD) does not al., 2010). provide money or any special econom- The organization does not wield ic benefits, it is easy to see why the Is- authority or provide finance, but is raeli government attributes great im- used for the member countries as a portance to Israel’s membership. For tool to discuss economic policies and Israel, membership in this prestigious reach agreements for aligning their organization means a victory of le- policies together. gitimacy, and a major setback for the However, the most important char- worldwide movement calling on Israel acteristic of the OECD is that it serves to be held accountable for its crimes Israel and the OECD | 9 against the Palestinian people. Israel’s fers to ignore the crimes committed Tourism minister Stas Misezhnikov by Israel, and reward it instead. This is said that “Israel’s joining the OECD is doing no less than feeding into the ar- of great importance in terms of build- gument of extremists who claim that ing a positive image for the country” only violence can safeguard the rights (Rriedman, 2010). of occupied Palestinians. Only democratic countries are al- Ironically, however, it seems the lowed to join the OECD, and Israel OECD worked harder than Israel to finds it increasingly difficult to portray facilitate the latter’s acceptance in May itself as a democracy, when 35% of the 2010. Israel refused to comply with the OECD’s demand to Israel won a victory of legitimacy by provide statistical data being accepted into the OECD, an act which applies only to the internationally recognised that whitewashes its crimes. parts of Israel, exclud- ing the occupied Syrian population under Israel’s control and Golan, East Jerusalem and the illegal sovereignty are disenfranchised, de- settlements in the West Bank. Yet de- nied their basic human and civil rights spite Israel’s refusal, the OECD Com- and repeatedly attacked by the Israeli mittee on Statistics found ways to ac- army. cept Israel anyway. What appears less obvious is why According to a leaked report: As- the member countries wanted to in- cension of Israel to the Organization: clude Israel in the OECD.
Recommended publications
  • Contesting the OECD Tourism Conference in Jerusalem Patents; and Human Rights Concerns – Including Israel’S Occupation of Territories It Seized in June 1967
    Contesting the In January 2010, Israel invited the OECD Tourism Committee to hold its October OECD Tourism meeting in Jerusalem this year. Israel was in Conference in the final stages of arranging its candidacy for accession to Organization for Economic Jerusalem Cooperation and Development (OECD), Marian Houk a Paris-based international organization grouping the world’s developed economies. The invitation was probably made during the visit to Israel of OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurría, a former Minister of Finance of Mexico, who was holding discussions with senior Israeli officials. It would be only the second time (out of 85 previous OECD tourism conferences) that the meeting would be held outside of Paris. OECD officials are careful and experienced bureaucrats – but they accepted without any apparent misgivings Israel’s offer of hospitality in Jerusalem from 20 to 22 October. Later, OECD officials would say that the last-minute uproar about holding the Tourism Committee meeting in Jerusalem was “a tempest in a teacup”. This, of course, is exactly what Israel would like the world to think. Israel’s position concerning Jerusalem is not officially accepted by most countries in the world, who have voted in the United Nations to declare “null and void” Israel’s unilateral actions to (1) extend its administration and laws to East Jerusalem after Israel’s conquest in the Six-Day War (June 1967) an act almost indistinguishable from annexation; and (2) then to declare “united Jerusalem” as Israel’s “eternal and undivided capital” in 1980. Objections to Israel’s candidacy had to be addressed in order to secure the unanimous agreement of all 30 OECD members to its admission.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia and Israel in the Changing Middle East Conference Proceedings
    Russia and Israel in the Changing Middle East Conference Proceedings Zvi Magen and Vitaly Naumkin, Editors Memorandum 129 המכון למחקרי ביטחון לאומי THE INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITYc STUDIES INCORPORATING THE JAFFEE bd CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES Russia and Israel in the Changing Middle East Conference Proceedings Zvi Magen and Vitaly Naumkin, Editors Institute for National Security Studies THE INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURcITY STUDIES INCORPORATING THE JAFFEE b d TheCENTER FOR STRA InstituteTEGIC STUDIES for National Security Studies (INSS), incorporating the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, was founded in 2006. The purpose of the Institute for National Security Studies is first, to conduct basic research that meets the highest academic standards on matters related to Israel’s national security as well as Middle East regional and international security affairs. Second, the Institute aims to contribute to the public debate and governmental deliberation of issues that are – or should be – at the top of Israel’s national security agenda. INSS seeks to address Israeli decision makers and policymakers, the defense establishment, public opinion makers, the academic community in Israel and abroad, and the general public. INSS publishes research that it deems worthy of public attention, while it maintains a strict policy of non-partisanship. The opinions expressed in this publication are the authors’ alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute, its trustees, boards, research staff, or the organization and individuals
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Settlement in the Occupied Territories
    REPORT ON ISRAELI SETTLEMENT IN THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES A Bimonthly Publication of the Foundation for Middle East Peac e Volum e 20 N umber 5 September-October 2010 BARACK OBAMA LOSES THE BATTLE FOR A SETTLEMENT FREEZE By Geoffrey Aronson struction in the West Bank to approxi - sity. In July 2009, however, the limits of mately 2,000. In view of this new con - Obama’s commitment to the freeze were President Barack Obama’s extraordi - struction, the practical value of a reim - revealed when Washington bowed nary diplomatic effort over the last two position of a settlement moratorium before Israel’s continuing settlement years has failed to contain to any signifi - becomes increasingly marginal. expansion in East Jerusalem, notably at cant and lasting degree the expansion of To the extent that there is a substan - the site of the Shepherds Hotel in Israeli settlements in the occupied West tive U.S. diplomatic agenda, it is that Sheikh Jarrah, throwing its demand for Bank and East Jerusalem. Already in its two months of direct talks are all that is a freeze into disarray and underlining first days, the Obama administration required to reach an agreement on the continuing stalemate. From this placed a settlement freeze, then defined where to place the border between Israel point onward, Washington has sought, by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as and a nascent Palestinian state. In view with little consistency or success, to “not some settlements, not outposts, not of the fact that diplomats have failed to “freeze” the freeze debate and focus its natural growth exceptions”—at the cen - draw an agreed border between Israel effort upon the achievement of a largely ter of its diplomatic effort and made it and Palestine for more than more than procedural objective—the establishment the litmus test of Prime Minister Benja- seven decades, and the chasm currently of direct negotiations between Israel and min Netanyahu’s commitment to a two separating the positions of Netanyahu the Palestine Liberation Organization state solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Report David Levi-Faur, Sabine Hofmann, Roy Karadag (Coordinator)
    Israel Report David Levi-Faur, Sabine Hofmann, Roy Karadag (Coordinator) Sustainable Governance Indicators 2019 © vege - stock.adobe.com Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators SGI 2019 | 2 Israel Report Executive Summary Israel’s government has shown a mix of improvements and deteriorations in its performance. In some areas, such as executive capacity and executive accountability, it showed high improvements. In other areas, such as democratic performance, it showed a couple of deteriorations. In yet other domains, such as economic and social policies, it has demonstrated a range of advances and retreats. Economic policies have been successful over the last decade, as Israel has shown strength in key economic indicators. Its economic growth has increased, but the inflation rate, as well as the unemployment rate, remain one of the lowest in the western world. However, the cost of living is still higher than the OECD average. With the unwillingness of Israel’s finance minister, Moshe Kahlon, to raise taxes, the deficit ceiling set by the Budget Deficit Reduction Law was exceeded by almost one percentage point in 2018. In social policies, as of 2018, Israel ranks 9th among OECD countries based on its inequality level as measured by the Gini coefficient. It also has one of the lowest rates of spending on social issues among OECD countries. Still, in some domains, it shows high levels of performance. For example, Israel’s higher education system continues to flourish, with a relatively high percentage of the population achieving a tertiary level of education. It also ranks sixth in Bloomberg’s World Health Care Efficiency Index.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Minister Krishna's Visit to Israel
    IDSA Issue Brief IDSIDSAA ISSUEISSUE BRIEFBRIEF1 Foreign Minister Krishna’s Visit to Israel: Adding Political Content to a Robust Partnership S. Samuel C. Rajiv S. Samuel C. Rajiv is Associate Fellow at the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, New Delhi January 16, 2012 Summary EAM S.M. Krishna’s visit to Israel, marked by both positive atmospherics and substance, was an important political effort on the part of the two governments to further consolidate the burgeoning bilateral relations, which stands on three pegs—economic, defence, and people-to-people contacts. Among the deliverables achieved during the visit include the signing of an extradition treaty and India agreeing to the Israeli proposal for opening a Consulate in the hi- tech hub of Bengaluru. High-level political and strategic engagement as exemplified by Mr. Krishna’s visit is essential to better understand each other’s concerns regarding difficult foreign policy issues as well as conserve the momentum in the bilateral ties for mutual benefit. Disclaimer: Views expressed in IDSA’s publications and on its website are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the IDSA or the Government of India. Foreign Minister Krishna’s Visit to Israel: Adding Political Content to a Robust Partnership 2 External Affairs Minister S.M. Krishna’s visit to the West Asian region from January 8-11, 2012 was unique in many respects. The Minister visited Jordan, Israel, the Palestinian Territories, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), with each of which India has important relationships. For instance, Jordan is an important supplier of fertilisers.
    [Show full text]
  • Wer Bewirbt Sich Um Die 120 Sitze in Der 19. Knesset?
    Stand: 3. Januar 2013 Wer bewirbt sich um die 120 Sitze in der 19. Knesset? Am Donnerstag, den 6. Dezember, endete um 22.00 Uhr die Frist zur Einreichung von Listen für die Wahl zur 19. Knesset, die am 22. Januar 2013 stattfinden wird. Insgesamt 34 Parteien oder Listen – darunter auch eine grüne und eine Piraten-Partei – bewerben sich um die 120 Mandate. 1 Die Listenbildung blieb bis zuletzt spannend: • HaAtzmaut („Die Unabhängigkeit“), eine vom gegenwärtigen Verteidigungsminister Ehud Barak geführte Abspaltung von der sozialdemokratischen Awoda, tritt nicht zur Wahl an. • Kurz vor Ablauf der Meldefrist lief das der Awoda angehörende Knesset-Mitglied Amir Peretz zur „Tsipi-Livni-Partei“ HaTnua („Die Bewegung“) über. • Die zentristischen oder moderat linken Parteien und Gruppierungen Awoda, Jesch Atid, Kadima und HaTnua schafften es nicht, sich auf eine gemeinsame Liste zu einigen, die als geschlossener Block der in Umfragen weit vorn liegenden gemeinsamen Liste von Likud und Israel Beitenu hätte gegenübertreten können. 2 So bleibt das Oppositionslager gespalten und startet mit wechselseitigen Schuldzuweisungen in die heiße Phase des Wahlkampfs. Amtsinhaber Netanjahu ist mit keinem/keiner Herausforderer/Heraus- forderin konfrontiert, der/die eine zahlenmäßig starke Truppe hinter sich vereinigt. Das israelische „Central Elections Committee“ 3 (hebräisch: Va’adet HaBehirot HaMerkasit) ist nach dem Wahlgesetz von 1969 4 damit beauftragt, die Wahlen zur nächsten Knesset durchzuführen. Nach Art. 16 und 17 des Wahlgesetzes besteht das Zentrale Wahl-Komitee aus Repräsentanten der Knesset-Fraktionen. Den Vorsitz führt ein Richter des Obersten Gerichtshofs. Zu den Aufgaben des Gremiums gehören die Genehmigung von Listen, Fragen der Wahlkampffinanzierung, die Veröffentlichung des Wahlergebnisses und die Entscheidung über Wahlanfechtungen.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Israel Country Report | SGI Sustainable Governance Indicators
    Israel Report David Levi-Faur, Sabine Hofmann, Roy Karadag (Coordinator) Sustainable Governance Indicators 2018 © vege - stock.adobe.com Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators SGI 2018 | 2 Israel Report Executive Summary The quality of Israeli democracy appeared to decline over the course of the review period. Given recent developments, 45% of Israeli citizens – with this group skewed toward left-wing Jewish voters and Arab Israelis – believe that Israel’s democratic system is in serious danger. Many decisions made by the current government have been seen as undermining the democratic rules of the game. Among the Knesset’s most controversial recent legislative measures have been a law requiring NGOs to disclose foreign funding sources and the Settlement Regularization Law, which addresses land privately owned by Palestinians. Additionally, several top Israeli political officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, have been involved in corruption cases. Despite Israel’s improvement in Transparency International’s 2016 Corruption Perceptions Index, a majority of the general public believes that Israel is a corrupt country. According to the 2017 Israeli Democracy Index, Israeli citizens show a considerable degree of distrust in Israel’s leadership and institutions. The level of trust in the government, the Knesset and political parties was very low, with 30% of Israeli citizens trusting the government, 26% trusting the Knesset and only 15% trusting political parties. Economic policies in recent years have not changed dramatically. Israel has continued to show strength in key economic indicators such as GDP growth, the employment rate and the inflation rate, although the rising cost of living, high poverty rates and inequality remain key issues for many Israeli citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Immigrant Parties: an Inefficient Russia Lobby
    Israel's Immigrant Parties: An Inefficient Russia Lobby Olena Bagno, Zvi Magen December 2010 Russia/NIS Center Ifri is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental and a non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European debate. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debates and research activities. The opinions expressed in this article are the authors’ alone and do not reflect the official views of their institutions. Russia/NIS Center © All rights reserved – Ifri – Paris, 2010 ISBN: 978-2-86592-803-3 IFRI IFRI-Bruxelles 27 RUE DE LA PROCESSION RUE MARIE-THERESE, 21 75740 PARIS CEDEX 15 – FRANCE 1000 BRUXELLES TEL. : 33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 TEL. : 32(2) 238 51 10 FAX : 33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 FAX : 32 (2) 238 51 15 E-MAIL : [email protected] E-MAIL : [email protected] WEBSITE : www.ifri.org Bagno & Magen / Israel and Russia Russie.Nei.Visions Russie.Nei.Visions is an online collection dedicated to Russia and the other new independent states (Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan). Written by leading experts, these policy-oriented papers deal with strategic and political issues as well as economic issues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palestinian Arab Minority and the 2009 Israeli Elections
    The Palestinian Arab Minority and the 2009 Israeli Elections The Mossawa Center, the Advocacy Center for Arab Citizens in Israel 5 Saint Luke’s Street P.O. Box 4471 Haifa, 31043, Israel [email protected] www.mossawa.org The Mossawa Center – The Palestinian Arab Minority and the 2009 Israeli Elections: March 2009 Update About the Mossawa Center The Mossawa Center, the Advocacy Center for Arab Citizens in Israel, is a non-profit, non- governmental organization that works to promote equality for the Arab Palestinian citizens of Israel. Established in 1997, the Mossawa Center strives to improve the social, economic and political status of the Arab citizens of Israel, while preserving their national and cultural rights as Palestinians. Our other English publications include: Akka, City on the Front – 2009 An Equal Constitution for All? On a Constitution and Collective Rights for the Arab Citizens in Israel – 2007 Contact Guide to the Arab Community in Israel – 2008 Racism in Israel – 2008 The Palestinian Arab Citizens of Israel: Status, Opportunities and Challenges for an Israeli-Palestinian Peace – 2006 Newsletter on Mossawa Center activities, accomplishments, and events Acknowledgements We would like to thank Open Society Institute for their financial assistance in the production of this document. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the Mossawa Center and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of this foundation. Copyright © March 2009 All rights reserved. Published in Haifa, Israel by The Mossawa Center, the Advocacy Center for Arab Citizens of Israel 2 The Mossawa Center – The Palestinian Arab Minority and the 2009 Israeli Elections: March 2009 Update Staff and Board BOARD Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Bishop Dr. Munib A. Younan the Diplomatic Wife Port's
    December 2011 INTERVIEW WITH BISHOP DR. MUNIB A. YOUNAN DIPLOMATIC EVENTS MI.MI.SOL A PERSONAL LULLABY PORT’S MARKET – THE FIRST INDOOR MARKET OF ISRAEL THE DIPLOMATIC WIFE EDITOR EDITOR Dear Friends, 10 Karlibah St., Tel-Aviv P.O.Box 20344, Tel-Aviv 61200, Israel 2011 was an eventful year, during which the hopes for peace in the Middle 708 Third Avenue, 4th Floor East were reawakened. We wish all the countries of the region a happy New York 10017, USA 2012 with renewed emphasis on peace and prosperity, where hatred dis- solves and harmony blooms. Club Diplomatique de Geneva P.O.Box 228, Geneva, Switzerland MERRY CHRISTMAS! According to Christian tradition, Bethlehem is the birthplace of Jesus of Nazareth. The town is inhabited by one of the oldest Christian communities Publisher The Diplomatic Club ltd in the world, although the size of the community has shrunk in recent years due to emigration. According to Biblical tradition, the city is also believed General Manager Julia Verdel to be the birthplace of David and the location where he was crowned as the Writers Barry Rubin king of Israel. Anthony J. Dennis HAPPY EID AL-ADHA! Patricia e Hemricourt, Israel Ira Moskowitz, Israel As three million pilgrims completed the Hajj, the once in a lifetime Muslim Bernard Marks, UK pilgrimage to Mecca, Muslims around the world celebrated Eid Al-Adha in Christopher Barder, USA November. Eid Al-Adha is the religious festival of sacrifice commemorating the strong devotion to God that Abraham proved through his willingness to sacrifice his son. After demonstrating his obedience, God gave him a sheep Reporters Neil Sandler to sacrifice instead, and ever since Muslims have been sacrificing the best Ksenia Svetlov of their flock on this holiday (in addition to praying, celebrating, feasting Eveline Erfolg and shopping).
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Hat Eine Neue Regierung Sieben Wochen Nach Der Wahl Zur 18
    LÄNDERBERICHT Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V. ISRAEL DR. LARS HÄNSEL 01. April 2009 Israel hat eine neue Regierung www.kas.de/israel www.kas.de Sieben Wochen nach der Wahl zur 18. lebenschance. Das in der Öffentlichkeit prä- Knesset wurde heute die 32. Regierung sentierte Argument, Netanjahu wolle sich Israels in der Knesset vereidigt, mit 69 nicht explizit zur Zwei-Staaten-Lösung be- Stimmen dafür und 45 Gegenstimmen. kennen, war für Kommentatoren nur vorge- Der Likud-Vorsitzende und neue Minister- schoben: Auch der Likud lehnt die Schaf- präsident Benjamin Netanjahu stellte eine fung eines palästinensischen Staates nicht Regierung aus Likud, Israel Beteinu, Ar- ab, wenn die Bedingungen dafür erfüllt sind beitspartei, Shas, Vereinigter Tora Juda- – für Netanjahu vor allem die Absicherung, ismus sowie Beit HaJehudi vor und kann dass ein palästinensischer Staat keine Ge- damit auf eine Mehrheit in der Knesset fahr für den Staat Israel darstellt und vom zurückgreifen. Allerdings muss Netanjahu Westjordanland nicht ähnliche Gefahren in der Koalition auf eine Vielzahl von wi- ausgehen wie vom Gazastreifen. Netanjahu derstreitenden Interessen Rücksicht verwies dazu immer wieder auf die Road nehmen. Gleichzeitig steht die Regierung Map, in deren ersten Stufe die Palästinenser vor großen Aufgaben. verpflichtet sind, auf Gewalt zu verzichten. In der langfristigen Perspektive sind sich Schwierige Koalitionsverhandlungen beide Parteien also einig. Während der Koa- litionsverhandlungen musste Netanjahu al- Obwohl der Likud unter Benjamin Netanja- lerdings Rücksicht auf die rechten Parteien hus Führung bei den Wahlen vom 10. Feb- nehmen, um sie nicht als potentielle Koaliti- ruar ein Knessetmandat weniger erringen onspartner zu verlieren. Dies machte sich konnte als die Kadima-Partei unter Tzipi Livni zunutze.
    [Show full text]
  • Observer UK's Anti-Bribery for Innovation, Intangibles Ma
    j% I oecd PI William Hat Observer UK's anti-bribery For innovation, intangibles ma Africa's emersin No 285 Q2 2011 www.oecdobserver.org "PlinWjWilljvJ Spotlight on Israel lead our newly updated For business thinking that stands out from the crowd. To succeed in today's complex world, Try the I HT free for 4 weeks you need a broader understanding of and enjoy daily delivery to your global events and what they mean. home or office. That'swhythe International Herald call Tribune gives you perceptive coverage 00800 44 48 78 27 (enter code OECD) of global geopolitics, security, culture visit and society, plus Business with subs.iht.com/oecd201 1 Reuters, a superb report on finance, Offer valid for new subscribers in Europe only and expires economics and markets - all in one December 31, 2011. concise, daily newspaper. International Beralb eribunc THE GLOBAL EDITION OF THE NEW YORK TIMES CONTENTS No 285 Q2 2011 READERS' VIEWS SPECIAL FOCUS De-facebook; Pupils in limbo 25-42 Israel EDITORIAL BOOKS Pushing the boundaries forward 45 Learning to rare Angel Gurn'a 46 New publications on OECD Library 50 Coming out of the water closet NEWS BRIEF ORDER FORM...ORDER FORM Long-term care spending to double-; DATABANK -as crisis stretches health spending; Start-ups squeeze; Multinational guidelines 53 Food inflation rises; Migration in a crisis updated; Soundbites; Russia moves towards 54 Main economic indicators Hillary Clinton's OECD anniversary speech, page 20 Anti-Bribery Convention; Economy; Internet 56 Your better life trends; Jobs with small children economy advances; New debt centre for South Africa; OECD and India enhance tax co-operation; Plus ça change..
    [Show full text]