DOCSLIB.ORG

Social Federal Judiciary Dinner (1)” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Social Federal Judiciary Dinner (1)” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R The original documents are located in Box 67, folder “White House - Social Federal Judiciary Dinner (1)” of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 67 of the Philip Buchen Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library WHITE HOUSE RECEPTION FOR THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY Guest List No. 1 (Active Federal Judges -- Washington, D. C. Area) SUPREME COURT The Chief Justice 311 N. Rochester Street Arlington, Virginia 22213 Mr. Justice Douglas 4852 Hutchins Place, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20007 Mr. Justice Brennan 3037 Dumbarton Avenue, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20007 Mr. Justice Stewart 5136 Palisade Lane, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20016 Mr. Justice White 6801 Hampshire Road McLean, Virginia 22101 Mr. Justice Marshall Supreme Court Building Washington, D. C. 20543 Mr. Justice Blackmun Supreme Court Building Washington, D. C. 20543 Mr. Justice Powell 550 N Street, S.W. Washington, D. C. 20024 Mr. Justice Rehnquist 7004 Arbor Lane McLean, Virginia 22101 Mr. Thomas C. Clark ' Associate Justice Retired The Supreme Court Washington, D. C. 20543 Mr. Stanley Reed Associate Justice Retired The Supreme Court Washington, D. C. 20543 Attn: i Mrs. McGuire Guest List No. 1, Page 2 U.S. COURT OF CUSTOMS AND PATENT APPEALS The Honorable Howard T. Markey (Chief Judge, U.S. CCPA) 2350 King Place, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20007 The Honorable Giles S. Rich (Associate Judge, U.S. CCPA) 4949 Linnean Ave., N.W. Washington, D. C. 20008 The Honorable Phillip B. Baldwin (Associate Judge, U.S. CCPA) 6437 Walters Woods Drive Falls Church, Virginia 22044 The Honorable Donald E. Lane (Associate Judge, U.S. CCPA) 3900 Watson Place, N.W. A-4C Washington, D. C. 20016 The Honorable Jack R. Miller (Associate Judge, U.S. CCPA) 5417 Kirkwood Drive Washington, D. C. 20016 ' Guest List No. 1, Page 3 U.S. COURT OF CLAIMS The Honorable Wilson Cowen (Chief Judge, U.S. Ct. of Claims) 2500 Virginia Avenue Washington, D. C. 20037 The Honorable Oscar H. Davis (Associate Judge, U.S. Ct. of Claims) 1101 Third Street, S.W. Washington, D. C. 20037 The Honorable Byron G. Skelton (Associate Judge, U.S. Ct. of Claims) Watergate East, Apt. 708-S 2500 Virginia Avenue Washington, D. C. 20037 The Honorable Philip Nichols, Jr. (Associate Judge, U.S. Ct. of Claims) 2801 New Mexico Avenue Washington, D. C. 20007 The Honorable Shiro Kashiwa (Associate Judge, U.S. Ct. of Claims) 2510 Virginia Avenue Watergate East Washington, D. C. 20037 The Honorable Robert L. Kun.zig (Associate Judge, U.S. Ct. of Claims) 1315 Fourth Street, S.W. Washington, D. C. 20024 The Honorable Marion T. Bennett (Associate Judge, U.S. Ct. of Claims) 3715 Cardiff Road Chevy Chase, Maryland 20015 • Guest List No. 1, Page 4 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA The Honorable David L. Bazelon (Chief Judge) 2700 Virginia Avenue, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20037 The Honorable J. Skelly Wright (Circuit Judge) 5317 Blackistone Road Westmoreland Hills Washington, D. C. 20016 The Honorable Carl McGowan (Circuit Judge) 4717 Quebec Street, N.W. Washington, D. C, 20016 The Honorable Edward Allen Tamm (Circuit Judge) 3353 Runnymede Place, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20015 The Honorable Harold Leventhal (Circuit Judge) 2406--44th Street, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20007 The Honorable Spottswood W. Robinson, III (Circuit Judge) 5400 Thirtieth Street, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20015 The Honorable George E. MacKinnon (Circuit Judge) 11333 Willowbrook Drive Potomac, Maryland 20854 The Honorable Roger Robb I (Circuit Judge) 1700 Hoban Road, N.W. Washington, D. C. The Honorable Malcolm Richard Wilkey (Circuit Judge) 540 N Street, S.W. Washington, D. C. 20024 Guest List No. 1, Page 5 U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA The Honorable George L. Hart, Jr. (Chief Judge) 3901 Jenifer Street, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20015 The Honorable John J. Sirica (District Judge) 5069 Overlook Road, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20016 The Honorable William B. Jones (District Judge) 5516 Grove Street Chevy Chase, Maryland 20015 The Honorable Howard F. Corcoran (District Judge) 9004 Congressional Court Potomac, Maryland 20854 The Honorable Oliver Gasch (District Judge) 3673 Upton Street, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20008 The Honorable William B. Bryant (District Judge) 2920 Northampton Street, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20015 The Honorable John Lewis Smith, Jr. (District Judge) 2424 Tracy Place, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20008 The Honorable Aubrey E. Robinson. Jr. (District Judge) 1796 Sycamore Street, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20012 The Honorable Joseph C. Waddy (District Judge) · 1804 Upshur Street, N.E. Washington, D. C. 20018 Guest List No. 1, Page 6 U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (continued) The Honorable Gerhard A. Gesell (District Judge) 3304 N.Street, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20007 The Honorable John H. Pratt (District Judge) 4119 Rosemary Street Chevy Chase, Maryland 20015 The Honorable Jt.me L. Green (District Judge) 261 Joyce Lane Arnold, Maryland 21012 The Honorable Barrington D. Parker (District Judge) 3115 Fessenden Street, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20008 The Honorable Charles R. Richey (District Judge) 10800 Lockland Road Potomac, Maryland 20854 The Honorable Thomas A. Flannery (District Judge) 5607 Jordan Road Springfield, Maryland 20016 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES The Honorable Edward H. Levi , Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice Washington, D. C. 20530 DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES The Honorable Harold R. Tyler, Jr. Deputy Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice Washington, D. C. 20530 Guest List No. l, Page 7 SOLICITOR GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES The Honorable Robert H. Bork Solicitor General of the United States 1007 Turkey Run Road McLean, Virginia 22101 CHAIRMAN, SENATE JUDICIARY COMM:ITTEE The Honorable James 0. Eastland Senator - Mississippi 5116 Macomb Street Washington, D. C. 20016 RANKING MEMBER, SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE The Honorable Roman L. Hruska Senator - Nebraska United States Senate Washington, D. C. 20510 CHAIRMAN, HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE The Honorable Peter W. Rodino, Jr. ·­ Representative - New Jersey United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C. RANKING MEMBER, HOUSE JUDICIARY.COMMITTEE The Honorable Edward Hutchinson Representative -.Michigan United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C. , Guest List No. 2 (List No. 1 -- Plus Active Federal Judges in Virginia and Maryland) ACTIVE FEDERAL JUDGES IN VIRGINIA The Honorable John D. Butzner, Jr. (U.S. Circuit Judge - Fourth Circuit) 5507 Dorchester Road Richmond, Virginia 23225 The Honorable H. Emory Widener, Jr. (U.S. Circuit Judge - Fourth Circuit) 537 Glenway Avenue Bristol, Virginia 24201 The Honorable Richard B. Kellam (Chief Judge - U.S. Dist. Ct., Eastern Dist. Va.) 2361 Princess Anne Road Princess Anne, Virginia Beach, Virginia 23456 The Honorable John A. MacKenzie (District Judge - U.S. Dist. Ct., Eastern Dist. Va.) 3 Graford Place Portsmouth, -Virginia 23 704 The Honorable Robert R. Merhige, Jr. (District Judge - U.S. Dist. Ct., Eastern Dist. Va.) 5 Kanawha Road Richmond, Virginia 23226 The Honorable Albert V. Bryan, Jr. (District Judge - U.S. Dist. Ct., Eastern Dist. Va.) 300 Crown View Drive Alexandria, Virginia 22314 The Honorable D. Dortch Warriner , (District Judge - U.S. Dist. Ct., Eastern Dist. Va.) 100 State Street Emporia, Virginia 23847 The Honorable J. Calvitt Clarke United States District Judge United States District Court for the Eastern District of Va. Norfolk, Virginia 23510 Guest List No. 2, Page 2 ACTIVE FEDERAL JUDGES IN VIRGINIA (continued) The Honorable James C. Turk (Chief Judge - U.S. Dist. Ct., Western Dist. Ya.) 1002 Walker Drive Radford, Virginia 24141 The Honorable Ted Dalton (District Judge - U.S. Dist. Ct., Western Dist. Va.) Box 652 Radford, Virginia 24141 ACTIVE FEDERAL JUDGES IN MARYLAND The Honorable Harrison L. Winter (U.S. Circuit Judge - Fourth Circuit) 16 Roland Mews Baltimore, Maryland 21210 The Honorable Edward S. Northrop (Chief Judge U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Md.) 4309 Wendover Road Baltimore, Maryland 21218 The Honorable Frank A. Kaufman (District Judge - U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Md.) 7 Clovelly Road, Pikesville, Md. 21208 The Honorable Alexander Harvey, II (District Judge - U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Md.) Brightside Road Baltimore, Maryland 21212 The Honorable James R. Miller, Jr. (District Judge - U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Md.) • 101 Ridgewood Road Baltimore, Maryland 21210 The Honorable Joseph H. Young (District Judge - U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Md.) 4105 Greenway Baltimore, Maryland 21218 Guest List No. 2, Page 3 ACTIVE FEDERAL JUDGES IN MARYLAND (continued) The Honorable Herbert F. Murray (District Judge - U.S. Dist. Ct., Dist. Md.), 204 Wyndhurst Avenue Baltimore, Maryland 21210 The Honorable C. Stanley Blair (District,Judge - U.S. Dist. Ct .• Dist. Md.) Grey Rock Farm Box 91, Route 2 Darlington, Maryland 21034 ' Guest List No. 3 _ .(List No. l -- Plus Chief Judges throughout United States) U.S. COURT OF CUSTOMS & PATENT APPEALS The Honorable Howard T. Markey* (Chief Judge - U.S. Ct. Cust. & Pat. Appls.) 2350 King Place, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20007 U.S. COURT OF CLAIMS The Honorable Wilson Cowen* (Chief Judge - U.S. Court of Claims) 2500 Virginia Ave.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of the U.S. Attorneys
    Bicentennial Celebration of the United States Attorneys 1789 - 1989 "The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. As such, he is in a peculiar and very definite sense the servant of the law, the twofold aim of which is that guilt shall not escape or innocence suffer. He may prosecute with earnestness and vigor– indeed, he should do so. But, while he may strike hard blows, he is not at liberty to strike foul ones. It is as much his duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to produce a wrongful conviction as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about a just one." QUOTED FROM STATEMENT OF MR. JUSTICE SUTHERLAND, BERGER V. UNITED STATES, 295 U. S. 88 (1935) Note: The information in this document was compiled from historical records maintained by the Offices of the United States Attorneys and by the Department of Justice. Every effort has been made to prepare accurate information. In some instances, this document mentions officials without the “United States Attorney” title, who nevertheless served under federal appointment to enforce the laws of the United States in federal territories prior to statehood and the creation of a federal judicial district. INTRODUCTION In this, the Bicentennial Year of the United States Constitution, the people of America find cause to celebrate the principles formulated at the inception of the nation Alexis de Tocqueville called, “The Great Experiment.” The experiment has worked, and the survival of the Constitution is proof of that.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strange Career of Birdie Mae Davis: a History of a School
    THE STRANGE CAREER OF BIRDIE MAE DAVIS: A HISTORY OF A SCHOOL DESEGREGATION LAWSUIT IN MOBILE, ALABAMA, 1963 - 1997 Except where reference is made to the work of others, the work described in this thesis is my own or was done in collaboration with my advisory committee. This thesis does not include propriety or classified information _____________________________ Brian Andrew Duke Certificate of Approval: _______________________ ________________________ David Carter Jennifer Brooks, Chair Associate Professor Associate Professor History History _______________________ ________________________ Larry Gerber George T. Flowers Professor Emeritus Dean History Graduate School THE STRANGE CAREER OF BIRDIE MAE DAVIS: A HISTORY OF A SCHOOL DESEGREGATION LAWSUIT IN MOBILE, ALABAMA, 1963 - 1997 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Arts Auburn, Alabama May 9, 2009 THE STRANGE CAREER OF BIRDIE MAE DAVIS: A HISTORY OF A SCHOOL DESEGREGATION LAWSUIT IN MOBILE, ALABAMA, 1963 - 1997 Brian Andrew Duke Permission is granted to Auburn University to make copies of this thesis at its discretion, upon request of individuals or institutions and at their expense. The author reserves all publication rights. ____________________________ Signature of Author ____________________________ Date of Graduation iii VITA Brian Andrew Duke, son of Andrew and Lynne (Rhodes) Duke was born 12 August 1983. From 1990 – 2002, he attended Mobile County Public Schools and graduated from Murphy High School in 2002. He attended Spring Hill College in Mobile, Alabama and graduated magna cum laude with a Bachelor of Arts degree in History in May 2006. He entered Graduate School, Auburn University, in August 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Attorney General's Task Force on Violent Crime
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ·-"t-·~\ ,0 li 1f' 1.;. National Criminal Justice Reference Service (",.~ ,.-_ >_J \ ~ncJ,rs-----i:il'~'~ u.s. Department of Justice t 1 : j !. :I .J j This microfiche was produced from documents received for inclusion in the NCJRS data base, Since NCJRS cannot exercise control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, the individual frame quality will vary, The resolution chart on Attorney General's this frame may be used to evaluate the document quality, Task Force on Violent Crime 2 5 :; 111112.8 . 11111 . 1.0 3 2 I~ Illil . I . \ W < ,0 w n~~ ~ Final Report :i I~ ... ~ 1.1 1.i.IL:.~ I August 17, 1981 , ) 111111.25 111111.4 111111.6 i I' MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS-1963-A ~l , r~' "~ ~.,. , .. ',",' '~, Microfilming' proc~d~~e~ used to create this fiche comply with . the standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.504. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the author(s) and do not represent the official , I .DATE FILMED! position or policies of the U. S. Department of Justice. ~. ". ~':I.....:-.~:y~:-:"" ""'-...c~-~ '."" ___""" b'""' "~' . (;F J~... .' . .. .. -.:-- ! TNati~nal i~stitut~-orJustice .. .. :lA.:· ~ . 12/01/811 .' t··· .. -, ,. .. ,. ,. ---.. -.-.~. --'-'--~ .~.~ ....~.. I , i l}nited States Department of Justice Washington, D. C. 20531 g L ..... .. i 1 I I , i~' " J ..... 1·.. " .~_)... ... r / / .. ' ...... r U.S. Department of Justice : Attorney General's Task Force on Violent Crime Final Report Task Force Members: GRIFFIN B.
    [Show full text]
  • Exclusionary Rule (1 of 2) Box: 6
    Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Barr, William: Files Folder Title: Exclusionary Rule (1 of 2) Box: 6 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ ,;:- WHITE HOUSE LAW LIBRARY ROOM 528 OEOB (2021 395-3391/ ·/ D 57 To @J1 dd:J Room~/~ From~ ( e_, flJ(l:si: t-T eep ___ To Borrow (Date Due _____, ___ Per Your Request/Per Our Conversation ditor's note: Over th e years, critics of the These justices were engaged in a less c/11sio11ary rule have called it, among other ambitious venture, albeit a most important ings, an "illogical," "-irrational," and "un­ one. They were interpreting the Fourth atural" interpretation of the Fourth and Amendment as b est they could. As they saw 011rtee11th Amendments. it, the rule-now known as the federal exclu­ Last fall, for example, U.S. Court of Ap­ sionary rule-rested on "a principled basis 5 als Judge Malcolm Wilkey, writing in the rather than an empirical proposition." all Street Journal, said the rule "is not The dissenters in United States v. Caland­ required by the Constitution . ... The exclu- ra were, I think, plainly right when they ionary rule is a judge-made rule of evidence maintained that "uppermost in the minds of hich bars 'the use of evidence secured the framers of the [exclusionary] mle" was rough an illegal search and seiz ure.' ..
    [Show full text]
  • Purposefully Restructuring the Law School Curriculum Malcolm Richard Wilkey
    BYU Law Review Volume 1981 | Issue 1 Article 15 3-1-1981 What Role for the Law School in American Legal Education? Purposefully Restructuring the Law School Curriculum Malcolm Richard Wilkey Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview Part of the Legal Education Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Malcolm Richard Wilkey, What Role for the Law School in American Legal Education? Purposefully Restructuring the Law School Curriculum, 1981 BYU L. Rev. 1 (1981). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol1981/iss1/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Brigham Young University Law Review at BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Law Review by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. What Role for the Law School in American Legal Education? Purposefully Restructuring the Law School Curriculum Malcolm Richard Wilkey* I. INTRODUCTION:HOWWE GOT WHEREWE ARE .... 11. THE OBJECTIVEOF LEGALEDUCATION: PRODUCING COMPETENTLAWYERS ........................... A. Delivery of Competent Legal Services. ...... B. Fields of Competence. ..................... C. Skills Essential to the Competent Practicing Lawyer ................................... 111. THELOCUS OF LEGALEDUCATION: WHERE LAWYERS SHOULDDEVELOP THESE SKILLS. ................. A. Skills Best Acquired Outside a Legal Setting B. Skills Best Acquired Within a Substantive Legal Setting ............................. C. The English Alternative: Responsibility for Legal Training Borne by the Legal Profession IV. THEPROPER ROLE OF THE LAWSCHOOL IN THE CON- TINUUM OF AMERICANLEGAL EDUCATION .......... A. Present Defects ........................... B. Two Remedies ............................ 1. A Radical Solution: Two Tiers of Legal Education ............................. 2. A Moderate Solution: Restructuring the Third Year.
    [Show full text]
  • NEW YORK INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW Winter 2002 Vol
    NEW YORK INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW Winter 2002 Vol. 15, No. 1 Articles 1 Acceding to the WTO: Advantages for Foreign Investors in the Ukrainian Market Daniil E. Fedorchuk 61 Bank Holiday: The Constitutionality of President Mahuad’s Freezing of Accounts and the Closing of Ecuador’s Banks Jorge J. Pozo 99 External Competence of the European Community in the Hague Conference on Private International Law: Community Harmonization and Worldwide Unification Charles T. Kotuby, Jr. Recent Decisions 131 Haywin Textile Products, Inc. v. International Finance Investment and Commerce Bank, Ltd. United States District Court grants summary judgment to plaintiff, holding defendant to be a successor in interest despite controlling Bangladeshi law denying third-party beneficiaries standing to sue for enforcement of a contract. 135 United States v. Charles Kim Second Circuit Court holds that jurisdiction over defendant is proper although the act of fraud and conspiracy was not committed in the United States. 141 The European Community v. RJR Nabisco, Inc. The revenue rule is a discretionary rule, not a constitutional rule or one imperative under international law, but the European Community lacks standing to sue under RICO for injury to the revenues of its member states. 149 Fujitsu Ltd. v. Federal Express Corp. Under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, application of the Warsaw Convention is not terminated by the Hague protocol but continues in force until the latter takes effect for the country in question. 157 Armiliato v. Zaric-Armiliato United States District Court holds that relief under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of Child Abduction, as implemented by the International Child Abduction Remedies Act, was appropriate once it is determined that the minor child had been wrongfully removed from her habitual residence.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Selection in the States: a Critical Study with Proposals for Reform Patrick Winston Dunn
    Hofstra Law Review Volume 4 | Issue 2 Article 3 1976 Judicial Selection in the States: A Critical Study with Proposals for Reform Patrick Winston Dunn Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr Recommended Citation Dunn, Patrick Winston (1976) "Judicial Selection in the States: A Critical Study with Proposals for Reform," Hofstra Law Review: Vol. 4: Iss. 2, Article 3. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlr/vol4/iss2/3 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dunn: Judicial Selection in the States: A Critical Study with Proposals NOTES AND COMMENTS JUDICIAL SELECTION IN THE STATES: A CRITICAL STUDY WITH PROPOSALS FOR REFORM* I. INTRODUCTION The basic consideration in every judicial establishment is the caliber of its personnel. The law as administered cannot be better than the judge who expounds it .... We need judges learned in the law, not merely the law in books but, something far more difficult to acquire, the law as applied in action in the courtroom; judges deeply versed in the mysteries of human nature and adept in the discovery of the truth in the discordant testimony of fallible human beings; judges beholden to no man, independent and honest and-equally important-believed by all men to be indepen- dent and honest; judges, above all, fired with consuming zeal to mete out justice according to law to every man, woman, and child that may come before them and to preserve individual freedom against any aggression of government; judges with the humility born of wisdom, patient and untiring in the search for truth and keenly conscious of the evils arising in a workaday world from any unnecessary delay.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reporterpublished by the American Law Institute
    VOLUME 32 • NUMBER 1 FALL 2009 The ReporterPublished By The American Law Institute DEDICATED TO CLARIFYING AND IMPROVING THE LAW XX The President’s Letter Capital Punishment and Other Matters Last May at the Annual Meeting, after (The Council report, dated April 15, At both the Council meeting and the thoughtful debate our members voted in 2009, is accessible on the Institute’s web- earlier Program Committee meeting, the favor of an amendment to a recommenda- site at http://www.ali.org/doc/Capital%20 general discussion about § 210.6 led to a tion of the Council that § 210.6 of the Punishment_web.pdf.) Because it was not look at other sections of the Model Penal Model Penal Code dealing with the death the exact recommendation of the Council, Code that also seem out of date and in penalty be withdrawn. The exact language of the motion that passed, with some members abstaining, was: …the Institute withdraws Section 210.6 of the Model Penal Code in light of the current intractable institutional and structural obstacles to For reasons stated in Part V of the ensuring a minimally adequate system for administering capital punishment. Council’s report to the membership, the Institute withdraws Section 210.6 of the Model Penal Code in light of the current intractable institutional and structural this motion did not become ALI policy need of revision. That certainly applies to obstacles to ensuring a minimally ade- but was referred back to the Council for its the sections addressing the crime of rape quate system for administering capital further deliberation and vote.
    [Show full text]
  • Federalism, Localism, and Public Interest Advocacy
    Why the Local Matters: Federalism, Localism, and Public Interest Advocacy !"#$%"&$'()*+$,*%%&-./$$ 0&1&-*+2.34$'()*+2.34$*51$$ 678+2)$95%&-&.%$:1;()*)# Papers from the Eleventh Annual Liman Colloquium! at Yale Law School, 2008 Published by the Liman Public Interest Program at Yale Law School and the National State Attorneys General Program at Columbia Law School CONTENTS ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS..............................................................................iii INTRODUCTION: ACTION ACROSS THE LANDSCAPE OF FEDERALISM ........ 1 Kathleen Claussen Class of 2010, Yale Law School; Member, Arthur Liman Public Interest Program Student Board Adam Grogg Class of 2010, Yale Law School; Member, Arthur Liman Public Interest Program Student Board Sarah French Russell Associate Research Scholar in Law and Clinical Lecturer in Law, Yale Law School; Director, Arthur Liman Public Interest Program I. THE ROLE OF LOCAL LEADERSHIP: REVISING THE HISTORY AND UNDERSTANDING THE PRESENT Civil Rights History Before, and Beyond, Brown ............................11 Risa Goluboff Professor of Law, Professor of History, Caddell & Chapman Research Professor, University of Virginia School of Law American Federalism and the American Civil Liberties Union ..... 21 Norman Dorsen Stokes Professor of Law, and Co-Director, Arthur Garfield Hays Civil Liberties Program, New York University Law School; former President, American Civil Liberties Union Susan N. Herman President, American Civil Liberties Union; Centennial Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School II. STATES AND CITIES AS ADVOCATES FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST The Progressive City ........................................................................39 Richard C. Schragger Professor of Law, Class of 1948 Professor in Scholarly Research in Law, University of Virginia School of Law !"#$%"&$'()*+$<%2++$,*%%&-./$$ San Francisco and the Rising Culture of Engagement$ in Local Public Law Offices0&1&-*+2.34$'()*+2.34$*51$678+2)$95%&-&.%$:1;()*)#........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Historical News
    The Historical Society of the U. S. Courts in the Eleventh Circuit 11th Circuit Historical News Volume XIII, Number 1 http://sites.google.com/site/circuit11history Spring 2016 Judge Wm. Terrell Hodges A wise and humble man and a life devoted to public service By James B. Murphy, Jr. The Honorable the Middle District Wm. Terrell Hodges to skyrocket.4 is now in his 45th While more year as a United district judges and States District magistrate judges Judge for the have been added Middle District of over the years, Florida. When he caseloads in the was appointed Middle District to the bench in of Florida have December 1971, remained among Hodges joined only the highest of one other district any district in the judge in the Tampa country.5 Division of the Hodges served Middle District, Ben his first 20 years Krentzman.1 With The office of Judge Wm. Terrell Hodges is filled with photographs of his former law clerks. (Photo by James B. Murphy, Jr.) as a district judge Hodges on board, in the Tampa there were still only Division of the six district judges in the entire district, which spanned all Middle District before he transferred to the Jacksonville the way from the Georgia border north of Jacksonville, Division in 1992. When Hodges took senior status in 1999, south to Orlando, west to Tampa, and south again to Fort he moved to the Ocala Division, where he continues 2 Myers. to preside. Despite being no longer an “active” judge, The population of the Middle District of Florida has Hodges kept a full caseload until last year, when he almost tripled from about 3.5 million to 11.4 million in the stopped handling civil cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Harold Hongju Koh Yale Law School P.O
    Harold Hongju Koh Yale Law School P.O. Box 208215 New Haven, CT 06520 203 432 4932 [email protected] Employment: 2013- Sterling Professor of International Law, Yale Law School (Procedure, Public and Private International Law, Human Rights, Law and U.S. Foreign Policy, Law and National Security, Brexit and the Law, International Business Transactions, Constitution and Foreign Affairs, International Trade, International Organizations, Law of Climate Change, International Law and Political Science) 2014- Nonresident Member, Blackstone Chambers, London 2009-13: Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (on leave as Martin R. Flug ’55 Professor of International Law at Yale Law School) (awarded Secretary of State’s Distinguished Service Award 2013); Head of Delegation for U.S. Government: U.N. Human Rights Council, Assembly of States Parties International Criminal Court (Kampala 2010) 2004-2009: Dean of Yale Law School & Gerard C. and Bernice Latrobe Smith Professor of International Law, Yale Law School 1998-2001: Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor United States Department of State; Commissioner, Commission for Security and Cooperation in Europe; U.S. Delegate or Head of Delegation to United Nations General Assembly (Third Committee), the United Nations Human Rights Commission, the Organization of American States, the Council of Europe, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, the U.N. Committee Against Torture, Inaugural Community of Democracies Meeting (Warsaw 2000); U.N. Conference on New and Restored Democracies (Cotonou, Benin 2000) 1993-2009: Gerard C. & Bernice Latrobe Smith Professor of International Law, Yale Law School 1998-2004: Director, Orville H. Schell Jr., Center for International Human Rights, Yale Law School 1990-93: Professor, Yale Law School 1985-90: Associate Professor, Yale Law School 1983-85: Attorney-Adviser, Office of Legal Counsel, United States Department of Justice 1982-83: Associate, Covington & Burling, Washington, DC 1981-82: Law Clerk to Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Attorneys Department of Justice Washinlton
    Published by Executive Office for United States Attorneys Department of Justice WashInlton September 23 1960 United States DEPARTMENT OF cJUSTICE Vol.8 No.20 UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS BULLETIN 617 UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS BULLETIN Vol Sptcmber 23 1960 No 20 1DNTLT TAI The aggregate total of cases and matters pning on June 30 1960 the end of the fiscal year was 11.5087 reduction of 2226 fr the previous month While this was very encouraging reduction the drop in the number of cases terminated particular..y civil cases and the rise in the number of cases pending were not so encouraging continuation of this rise was indicated in the totals for July 31 1960 the first nth of the new fiscal year Totals in all categories of work were up and the aggregate of cases and matters pending had increased by 1690 items During July fewer cases were filed fewer cases were terminated and more cases were pending at the end of the month Set out below is cparison of the cases filed termi nated and pending during July 1959 and July 1960 July July Increase or Decrease 1959 1960 Number Filed CrIminal 1916 1709 207 10.8 Civil 2151 1863 288 13.11 Total 11067 3572 1195 -12.2 Terminated Crim1nl 1896 1600 296 156 Civil 1639 1463 176 107 Total 3535 3063 1172 13.11 Penilng Criminal 7769 7920 151 1.9 Civil 18877 19657 780 1i.i Total 266146 27577 /93i /3.5 Results in the field of collections were much more encouraging than In the area of litigation For the month of July 1960 United States Attorneys reported collections of $3162585 This is $1169816 or 58.7 per cent more then
    [Show full text]