2050 Global Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2050 Global Europe Global Europe 2050 Research and Innovation EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Directorate B – European Research Area Unit B.5. – Social Sciences and Humanities Contact: Domenico Rossetti di Valdalbero European Commission Bureau SDME 04/91 B-1049 Brussels Tel. (32-2) 29-62811 Fax (32-2) 29-79608 E-mail: [email protected] EUROPEAN COMMISSION Global Europe 2050 Directorate-General for Research and Innovation 2012 Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities EUR 25252 GlobalEurope 2012-B5_Interieur_120508.indd 1 14/05/12 16:48 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GLOBAL EUROPE 2050 EUROPE DIRECT is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. LEGAL NOTICE Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2012 ISBN 978-92-79-23357-9 ISSN 1018-5593 DOI:10.2777/79992 © European Union, 2012 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium PRINTED ON ELEMENTAL CHLORINE-FREE BLEACHED PAPER (ECF) GlobalEurope 2012-B5_Interieur_120508.indd 2 14/05/12 16:48 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GLOBAL EUROPE 2050 3 Foreword We can rise to the Europe 2020 challenges of dealing with an ageing population, securing sus- tainable resources, developing clean energy supplies, improving healthcare and combating climate change – but only if we take effective short, medium and long term action. This is why the European Commission asked twenty five leading analysts to look into the future and work- through a number of scenarios to see where the EU might be in 2050. Their work, presented in this Global Europe 2050 report, analyses three key scenarios which describe different but nonetheless possible pathways that Europe could choose to follow over the decades to come. The first scenario is what if Nobody cares and Europe just muddles along with no clear vision or direction. In this scenario the analysis shows that economic growth will remain stubbornly lower than in the US and China, and that we will fail to exploit our potential for innovation and will, in consequence, lose our position in terms of global competitiveness to other regions in the world. At the other extreme, the EU under threat scenario paints a bleak picture of global economic decline followed by reactionary protectionist measures. The EU will see its share of world GDP fall by almost a half by 2050. Frequent food and oil crises will occur. EU Member States will become more inward-looking leading to inefficient fragmentation of effort that will touch every sector especially research – so vital for our future prosperity. Fortunately, the third scenario, which the experts call the European Renaissance, describes a much more attractive pathway. The EU continues to enlarge and become stronger. It consoli- dates its political, fiscal and military integration. Innovation systems become more efficient with an increased role given to users. Investment in technological and services innovations will have a direct impact on economic and social development. Member States will work together to make the European Research Area fully functional with research agendas being decided in common across Europe. EU GDP almost double by 2050. These scenarios are presented by some of Europe’s leading foresight and macro-economic modelling experts. Their work not only demonstrates the power of forward-looking exercises but lights the path to a better future – a path that we can and must follow. The first steps have already been taken. The EU 2020 strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth has paved the way for the creation of the Innovation Union and led to a completely new EU approach for supporting research and innovation – Horizon 2020, which will help put the EU on the path- way towards a European Renaissance. Robert-Jan SMITS Director-General for Research and Innovation European Commission GlobalEurope 2012-B5_Interieur_120508.indd 3 14/05/12 16:48 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 4 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GLOBAL EUROPE 2050 Table of Contents 1. Looking ahead: main issues, trends and scenarios building approach 8 1.1 Unfolding issues and trends 8 1.2 Scenario building approach 19 1.2.1 Qualitative analysis 20 1.2.2 Quantitative analysis 36 2. Global Europe-2050 scenarios 60 2.1 Standstill in European Integration – ‘Nobody cares’ 62 2.1.1 Global demographic and societal challenges 64 2.1.2 Energy and natural resources security and efficiency, environment and climate change 66 2.1.3 Economy and technology prospects 69 2.1.4 Geopolitics and governance 75 2.1.5 Territorial and mobility dynamics 79 2.1.6 Research, education and innovation 80 2.2 Fragmented European Integration – ‘EU Under threat’ 82 2.2.1 Global demographic and societal challenges 84 2.2.2 Energy and natural resource security and efficiency, environment and climate change 87 2.2.3 Economy and technology prospects 90 2.2.4 Geopolitics and governance 92 2.2.5 Territorial and mobility dynamics 97 2.2.6 Research, education and innovation 98 GlobalEurope 2012-B5_Interieur_120508.indd 4 14/05/12 16:48 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GLOBAL EUROPE 2050 5 2.3 Further European integration – ‘EU Renaissance’ 99 2.3.1 Global demographic and societal challenges 101 2.3.2 Energy and natural resource security and efficiency, environment and climate change 104 2.3.3 Economy and technology prospects 107 2.3.4 Geopolitics and governance 119 2.3.5 Territorial and mobility dynamics 124 2.3.6 Research, education and innovation 126 3. Shaping the future: EU research and innovation policy 128 3.1 Nobody cares… but the European Commission 130 3.2 EU Under threat… 133 3.3 An EU Renaissance… from European romanticism to European ‘Realpolitik’ 136 4. Key messages 140 4.1 Investing in knowledge 140 4.2 Political and cultural integration 141 4.3 Business as usual is not an option 142 Annex 1 – Bibliography 144 Annex 2 – Experts’ biographies 148 Acknowledgements 157 GlobalEurope 2012-B5_Interieur_120508.indd 5 14/05/12 16:48 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 6 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GLOBAL EUROPE 2050 Tables Table 1 Regional aggregations 38 Table 2 List of sectors used for the exercise 39-40 Table 3 Main variables in the scenario modelling 40 Table 4 Scenario structure and wild cards 60 Table 5 GDP for selected regions, 2010-2050, constant 2005 USD bn: ‘Nobody cares’ 63 Table 6 GDP for selected regions, 2010-2050, constant 2005 USD bn: ‘EU Under threat’ 83 Table 7 Labour force at 2050: ‘EU Under threat’ 90 Table 8 Human capital at 2050: ‘EU Under threat’ 91 Table 9 GDP for selected regions, 2010-2050, constant 2005 USD bn: ‘EU Renaissance’ 99 Figures Figure 1 Energy price (2005 USD per barrels of oil) Nobody cares, Renaissance and Under threat 42 Figure 2 Energy efficiency in the three scenarios: Japan, USA, China 43 Figure 3 Energy consumption in the three scenarios: China 43 Figure 4 Population in the main regions of the developing world: Nobody cares 45 Figure 5 Population in the main regions of the developed world: Nobody cares 45 Figure 6 Labour force – USA and EU: Nobody cares 45 Figure 7 Average number of years of schooling: Nobody cares 46 Figure 8 Average number of years of schooling: Under threat 47 Figure 9 Average number of years of schooling: Renaissance 47 Figure 10 Accumulation of capital: Nobody cares 47 Figure 11 Capital intensity of the production: Nobody cares 48 GlobalEurope 2012-B5_Interieur_120508.indd 6 14/05/12 16:48 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GLOBAL EUROPE 2050 7 Figure 12 Total Factor Productivity: Nobody cares, EU27 as a whole 49 Figure 13 Total Factor Productivity: Nobody cares, focus on the developing world 49 Figure 14 Total Factor Productivity: Nobody cares, euro-zone largest economies 49 Figure 15 Total Factor Productivity: Renaissance and Under threat 50 Figure 16 EU27 GDP under the three scenarios (constant 2005 USD) 50 Figure 17 GDP ‘Under threat’ and ‘Renaissance’ scenarios: EU27, USA, China (constant 2005 USD) 51 Figure 18 GDP of India, SSA, MENA (constant 2005 USD) 52 Figure 19 GDP per capita (constant 2005 PPP) relative to the US (USA = 100 at each date) 52 Figure 20 World GDP in 2050 (bn 2005 USD) for each scenario 53 Figure 21 Changes in agricultural productivity associated with climate change: Under threat 54 Figure 22 TFP gains in agriculture (2010-2050) EU27 55 Figure 23 TFP gains in agriculture (2010-2050) Sub-Saharan Africa 55 Figure 24 Regional shares in world vegetal production: ‘Nobody cares’ 55 Figure
Recommended publications
  • EPP Enlarged Group Bureau Meeting EIN SUMMER UNIVERSITY 'EIN: Achievements and Its Role to Play in the Future' EN
    EPP Enlarged Group Bureau Meeting EIN SUMMER UNIVERSITY ‘EIN: Achievements and its role to play in the future’ ‘The success of the Political Networking’ 19 June 2014 ALBUFEIRA Service Documentation - Publications Recherche EPP Group Group of the European People’s Party (Christian Democrats) in the European Parliament EN European Ideas Network 2 Vade-mecum of the speakers VADE-MECUM of the Speakers European Ideas Network 3 European Ideas Network 4 Vade-mecum of the speakers Michael BORCHARD, Head of the Department of Politics and Consulting, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (KAS) Michael Borchard is Director of the Department for Policy Consulting, a think tank at the Konrad-Adenauer Foundation in Berlin. Previously, he headed the unit on domestic policy in this department. Before joining the Konrad-Adenauer Foundation, Mr. Borchard served as the Head of the Speech-Writing Division at the State-Chancellery of Thuringia, as senior speech-writer to the Minister-President of Thuringia, Dr. Bernhard Vogel. Prior to this he worked as a member at the team of speech-writers for Chancellor Dr. Helmut Kohl in the office of the Federal Chancellor. His previous work experience includes several years as a freelance journalist as well as researcher for contemporary history. Mr. Borchard holds a Ph.D. in contemporary history and political science from the University of Bonn, Germany. His dissertation on “The German Prisoners of War in the Soviet Union. The political importance of the Prisoner-of-War-Problem for both German States and the Western Allies between 1949 and 1955” was awarded the Geffrub-Prize 1999 from the University of Bonn for the best dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Global Go to Think Tank Index Report1
    University of Pennsylvania Masthead Logo ScholarlyCommons TTCSP Global Go To Think aT nk Index Reports Think aT nks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) 1-2019 2018 Global Go To Think aT nk Index Report James G. McGann University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks Part of the International and Area Studies Commons McGann, James G., "2018 Global Go To Think aT nk Index Report" (2019). TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports. 16. https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/16 2019 Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the University of Pennsylvania, Think aT nks and Civil Societies Program. All requests, questions and comments should be sent to: James G. McGann, Ph.D. Senior Lecturer, International Studies Director, Think aT nks and Civil Societies Program The Lauder Institute University of Pennsylvania Email: [email protected] This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/16 For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2018 Global Go To Think aT nk Index Report Abstract The Thinka T nks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) of the Lauder Institute at the University of Pennsylvania conducts research on the role policy institutes play in governments and civil societies around the world. Often referred to as the “think tanks’ think tank,” TTCSP examines the evolving role and character of public policy research organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Parliament 2025 Preparing for Complexity
    THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2025 Multi- player systems Doing Multi-level politics in governance 2025 r -pola Multi xt conte Prospective studies ech -t and Planning lti r Mu rato ele acc Legislative cooperation al hnic Tec es leng chal PREPARING FOR COMPLEXITY CSG Strategic Planning Team January 2012 - 2 - THE SECRETARY GENERAL THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2025 PREPARING FOR COMPLEXITY REPORT ABOUT THE REPORT Origin The present report is an initiative of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament. The objective is to progressively introduce an increased attention to the long term issues and to give to the EP's different stakeholders the opportunity to build their own vision of the long term major trends likely to impact their missions and their working processes. The purpose of the First Part (Part 1) of the Report was to initiate internal discussions, to raise questions and options (Part 2) as part of a continued and collective process to bring the functioning of the institution in line with its rapidly moving environment in a time of increased uncertainty. Methodology This First Part of the Report draws on analyses of mega-trends from academic literature. The methodology followed has been to compile central elements of theory from various disciplines (international relations, political sciences, social sciences, technology) concerning some key long-term mega-trends identified as relevant in the EP context. This short list of mega-trends is of course not exclusive. Academic works selected are among the most read and most frequently quoted ones. Those sources have been completed by recent empirical analyses or opinions from think tanks, research bodies, expert groups or the press, supporting hypotheses founded in theory.
    [Show full text]
  • «Poor Family Name», «Rich First Name»
    ENCIU Ioan (S&D / RO) Manager, Administrative Sciences Graduate, Faculty of Hydrotechnics, Institute of Construction, Bucharest (1976); Graduate, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest (2003). Head of section, assistant head of brigade, SOCED, Bucharest (1976-1990); Executive Director, SC ACRO SRL, Bucharest (1990-1992); Executive Director, SC METACC SRL, Bucharest (1992-1996); Director of Production, SC CASTOR SRL, Bucharest (1996-1997); Assistant Director-General, SC ACRO SRL, Bucharest (1997-2000); Consultant, SC GKS Special Advertising SRL (2004-2008); Consultant, SC Monolit Lake Residence SRL (2008-2009). Vice-President, Bucharest branch, Romanian Party of Social Solidarity (PSSR) (1992-1994); Member of National Council, Bucharest branch Council and Sector 1 Executive, Social Democratic Party of Romania (PSDR) (1994-2000); Member of National Council, Bucharest branch Council and Bucharest branch Executive and Vice-President, Bucharest branch, Social Democratic Party (PSD) (2000-present). Local councillor, Sector 1, Bucharest (1996-2000); Councillor, Bucharest Municipal Council (2000-2001); Deputy Mayor of Bucharest (2000-2004); Councillor, Bucharest Municipal Council (2004-2007). ABELA BALDACCHINO Claudette (S&D / MT) Journalist Diploma in Social Studies (Women and Development) (1999); BA (Hons) in Social Administration (2005). Public Service Employee (1992-1996); Senior Journalist, Newscaster, presenter and producer for Television, Radio and newspaper' (1995-2011); Principal (Public Service), currently on long
    [Show full text]
  • The Presidency the EPP Group Structure
    Follow us The EPP Group Structure The Presidency April 2018 Founded as the Christian - Democratic Group on 23 June 1953 as a faction THE BUREAU in the Common Assembly of the European Coal and Steel Community, The Bureau, the Group's political organ, shall consist of: the Group changed its name to the 'Group of the European People's Party' (Christian-Democratic Group) in July 1979, just after the first direct > the Members of the Presidency elections to the European Parliament, and to the 'Group of the European > the Heads of National Delegations and an additional Member People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats' in July for every ten Members 1999. After the European elections in 2009, the Group went back to its roots > the Members of the Presidency of the Parliament belonging to the Group > the Chairmen of Standing Committees belonging to the Group as the 'Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats)'. > the Coordinator within each of the Standing Committees It has always played a leading role in the construction of Europe. > the Chairman and the Secretary General of the European The Chairman of the EPP Group is Manfred Weber MEP. He chairs People's Party, if they are Members of the European Parliament its governing bodies and speaks for the Group in keynote debates (If the Chairman and the Secretary General of the European People's during the Plenary Sessions at the European Parliament. He is Party are not Members of the European Parliament, they are permanently supported by Coordinators on each of the Parliament's committees invited ad personam to the meetings of the Bureau.) and by Heads of the National Delegations represented in the Group.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Global Go to Think Tank Index Report
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports (TTCSP) 6-18-2020 2019 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report James G. McGann University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks Part of the International and Area Studies Commons McGann, James G., "2019 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report" (2020). TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports. 17. https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/17 2020 Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by an information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the University of Pennsylvania, Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program. All requests, questions and comments should be sent to: James G. McGann, Ph.D. Senior Lecturer, International Studies Director Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program The Lauder Institute University of Pennsylvania Email: [email protected] This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/think_tanks/17 For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2019 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report Abstract The Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) of the Lauder Institute at the University of Pennsylvania conducts research on the role policy institutes play in governments and civil societies around the world. Often referred to as the “think tanks’ think tank,” TTCSP examines the evolving role and character of public policy research organizations. Over the last 29 years, the TTCSP has developed and led a series of global initiatives that have helped bridge the gap between knowledge and policy in critical policy areas such as international peace and security, globalization and governance, international economics, environmental issues, information and society, poverty alleviation, and healthcare and global health.
    [Show full text]
  • Schuman's Europe
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/19767 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Krijtenburg, Margriet Title: Schuman’s Europe : his frame of reference Issue Date: 2012-09-11 CHAPTER TWO Schuman and Contemporary Thinkers on Europe This chapter will introduce Schuman’s thoughts on European unification and will attempt to determine the uniqueness of these thoughts. The chapter will therefore include a brief discussion of contemporary thinkers who thought about European unification in order to provide a comparison with Schuman’s thoughts and give a more articulate version of his ideas. Key concepts will be European spiritual and cultural heritage with a focus on the human person and Christian morality and, when applicable, on supranationality. The intellectual climate that surrounded Schuman those days is barely reflected in his writings. His library in Scy-Chazelles confirms the supposition made by his biographer François Roth, that he was not much interested in fashionable contemporary books or intellectual theories. He owned scarcely any books by contemporary novelists such as Camus or Sartre. On the other hand he owned a great deal of history, Greek and Roman culture and religion such as the entire Summa Theologiae by Thomas Aquinas and the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church. Whenever Schuman expressed himself and his interests more profoundly, he did so with discretion and only in the Catholic Institute, among Catholic intellectuals,102at conferences with 102. Referring to Schuman’s private
    [Show full text]
  • Ideas, Influence and Transparency - What Could Think Tanks Learn and Contribute?
    EPIN Think Tanks Task Force m eeting of October 20-21, 2005, Brussels Ideas, Influence and Transparency - What Could Think Tanks Learn and Contribute? Summary and key conclusions “How do you change the world? Well, there are the obvious routes, such as seizing power, being monstrously rich or slogging through the electoral process. And there are short-cuts, such as terrorism… or forming a think tank.” Steve Waters, “Dangerous Minds”, November 10, 2004, The Guardian All think tanks try to have an input in the policy process. While they have not been under the spotlight, they are increasingly visible, and the legitimacy of their input into policy-making may be questioned in the future, as indicated by Steve Waters’ recent article. This is particularly the case for ‘Euro-think tanks’, as EU politics, fairly or unfairly, are perceived as too technocratic, even elitist, and insufficiently transparent. On Thursday 20 and Friday 21 October 2005, members of the European Policy Institutes Network (EPIN) met with representatives of the European institutions, the public affairs community and the media to learn, and contribute (Annex 1 provides a list of participants). This was the first of a series of EPIN Think Tanks Taskforce meetings. Think tanks and transparency Summary of discussions Ideas, Influence and Transparency - What Could Think Tanks Learn and Contribute? Oct.20-21, 2005 EPIN TTT 1 Think tanks and transparency Citizens are critical of their national and EU elected representatives. There is increasing scepticism towards European integration. ‘Euro-think tanks’ are perceived as an integral part of the EU policy-making machine, but few are transparent about their activities: § How they are funded § How their budget is used § What contacts they have with policy-makers § Where their researchers come from With the rise of ‘advocacy tanks’ that promote an ideological agenda, there is also the danger that think tanks will be rejected as the extension of special interests that seek less visible means of influence1.
    [Show full text]
  • Grégory Claeys
    Grégory Claeys Bruegel Phone: +33 6 82 66 12 94 Rue de la Charité 33, E-Mail: [email protected] 1210 Brussels, Belgium Webpage: www.gregoryclaeys.com Current Positions Since 2014 Bruegel Research Fellow Brussels, Belgium Research on European Macroeconomics, Monetary and Fiscal Policy. Since 2015 Conservatoire National Arts et Métiers Associate Professor Paris, France Professional Experience 2012 Central Bank of Chile Visiting Researcher Santiago, Chile 2-month Mission in the Financial Research Department. Development of a liquidity risk index for the Chilean financial sector. 2008 – 2009 Sciences Po Paris Lecturer Paris, France 2006 – 2009 Crédit Agricole – Research Department Economist Paris, France Research on macroeconomic and financial issues. In charge of forecasts, macro models and analysis of the economic developments in various countries. 2004 French Embassy – Economic Department Economist Chicago, USA 3-month internship: Economic studies about the United States. 2003 – 2004 KPMG – RSM Salustro Reydel Financial Auditor Paris, France 6-month internship. Education 2009 – 2015 European University Institute PhD in Economics Florence, Italy Dissertation title: Three Essays on Liquidity Risk Thesis jury: Pr. Elena Carletti (Thesis supervisor, EUI and Bocconi University), Pr. Andrea Mattozzi (EUI), Pr. Bruno Parigi (University of Padua), Pr. Philippe Weil (Université Libre de Bruxelles and Sciences Po). 2012 Universitat Pompeu Fabra Visiting PhD Student Barcelona, Spain European Doctoral Program (6-month exchange program). 2004
    [Show full text]
  • Ein Summer University Bucharest
    EIN SUMMER UNIVERSITY A Centre Right Answer to the Economic and Social Crisis : a Project for Europe 22 - 24 September 2011 BUCHAREST VADEMECUM of the Speakers Service Documentation - Publications Recherche EPP Group Group of the European People’s Party (Christian Democrats) in the European Parliament EN European Ideas Network 2 Vademecum of the speakers Vademecum of the speakers European Ideas Network 3 European Ideas Network 4 Vademecum of the speakers Roberta Alma ANASTASE Speaker of the Chamber of Deputies On December 19th, 2008, Roberta Anastase was elected Speaker of the Chamber of Deputies. She is the first woman to hold the office in the history of Romania. Prior to being elected, Ms. Anastase was a Member of Parliament, representing her home county of Prahova in the Chamber of Deputies. From 2005 to 2008, she was an observer, and then a Member of the European Parliament, affiliated with the European People’s Party – European Democrats Group. In November of 2008, under a new voting system, she was reelected as the first representative of the 11th electoral district of Prahova (Ploiesti-Vest) to the Chamber of Deputies. Ms. Anastase was born in Ploieşti on March 27th, 1976. A sociologist by training, she pursued post-graduate studies in Political Science and European Studies. Throughout her time as an MP and an MEP, Ms. Anastase has supported justice reform, women’s rights and equal opportunities. She was also European Parliament Rapporteur for the Black Sea Synergy and maintains a keen interest in foreign and regional affairs. Bogdan Lucian AURESCU A career diplomat, Bogdan Aurescu was appointed Secretary of State for Strategic Affairs in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on 4 February 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • 001 Faes 20 Aniversario
    1989 - 2009 1989 - 2009 José María Aznar Presidente de FAES President of FAES El 30 de octubre de 1995, S. M. el Rey recibió al Patronato de la Fundación. En la imagen, S.M. el Rey y José María Aznar durante la Audiencia. On October 30, 1995, HM the King received the trustees of the Foundation. The photograph shows HM the King and José María Aznar during the Audience. FAES: VEINTE AÑOS DE TRABAJO AL SERVICIO FAES: TWENTY YEARS DEVOTED DE ESPAÑA Y DE LA LIBERTAD TO SPAIN AND FREEDOM Siempre he tenido claro que las ideas importan, I have always believed that ideas are important, y mucho; que las ideas tienen consecuencias; que very much so; ideas have consequences; good las buenas ideas tienen buenas consecuencias, y ideas have good consequences and bad ideas que las malas, malas consecuencias; que gobernar have bad consequences; governing a nation is una nación es mucho más que la mera gestión de much more than simply managing public affairs; los asuntos públicos; que la política que no se policies that are not established on a firm asienta en un proyecto ideológico sólido no tiene ideological platform have no value; political valor alguno; que el poder político no es un fin en power is not an end in itself; political power sí mismo; que el poder político debe servir para should be used to promote change which is cambiar las cosas con fidelidad a los principios, faithful to the principles, values and ideas one valores e ideas en los que uno cree; que gobernar believes in; governing means carrying out the exige cumplir con el programa electoral comprometido election program that was promised to citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • The Presidency the EPP Group Structure
    Follow us The EPP Group Structure The Presidency April 2016 Founded as the Christian - Democratic Group on 23 June 1953 as a faction THE BUREAU in the Common Assembly of the European Coal and Steel Community, The Bureau, the Group's political organ, consists of: the Group changed its name to the 'Group of the European People's Party' (Christian-Democratic Group) in July 1979, just after the first direct > The Members of the Presidency elections to the European Parliament, and to the 'Group of the European > The Heads of National Delegations People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats' in July > The Vice-Presidents and Quaestors of the European Parliament 1999. After the European elections in 2009, the Group went back to its roots belonging to the Group as the 'Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats)'. > The Chairmen of Parliamentary Committees belonging to the Group It has always played a leading role in the construction of Europe. > The Coordinator within each of the Standing Committees > The Chairman and the Secretary-General of the European The Chairman of the EPP Group is Manfred Weber MEP. He chairs People's Party, if they are Members of the European Parliament its governing bodies and speaks for the Group in keynote debates > One co-opted Member for every 10 Members of a national delegation during the Plenary Sessions at the European Parliament. He is supported by Coordinators on each of the Parliament's Committees THE FOUR WORKING GROUPS and by Heads of the National Delegations represented in the Group. The operational needs of the Group are serviced by a Group The EPP Group's political strategy is formulated in the framework of Manfred Weber Esther de Lange Secretariat, providing policy and organisational support.
    [Show full text]