DOCSLIB.ORG

Prosody-Syntax Interface in Spontaneous Spoken Hebrew

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prosody-Syntax Interface in Spontaneous Spoken Hebrew Tel Aviv University The Lester & Sally Entin Faculty of Humanities The Chaim Rosenberg School of Jewish Studies The SpeeCHain Perspective: Prosody‐Syntax Interface in Spontaneous Spoken Hebrew THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE “DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY” by Vered Silber‐Varod Under the supervision of: Prof. Shlomo Izre'el SUBMITTED TO THE SENATE OF TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY April 2011 Table of Contents Lists ..................................................................................................................................... vi Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Overview of the dissertation ................................................................................ 6 2 Prosody ...................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 The Intonation Unit and its boundaries .............................................................. 13 2.2 Annotation systems of prosodic boundary tones – from theory to practice ..... 17 2.3 The communicative value of prosodic boundaries: terminal vs. continuous boundary tones ................................................................................................... 20 2.4 Summary ............................................................................................................. 24 3 Theoretical approaches to the prosody‐syntax interface ......................................... 25 3.1 Prosodic phonology ............................................................................................ 27 3.1.1 Prosodic phonology and Hebrew research ................................................. 30 3.2 Studying prosody independently of syntax ........................................................ 32 3.2.1 Summary ..................................................................................................... 35 3.3 Spontaneous speech as fundamental for the study of language ....................... 36 3.3.1 Planned speech evidence............................................................................ 38 3.3.2 Written language evidence ......................................................................... 39 3.3.3 Evidence from other languages .................................................................. 40 3.3.4 Spontaneous data ....................................................................................... 41 4 Research questions .................................................................................................... 43 5 Corpus ........................................................................................................................ 44 5.1 Transcription conventions .................................................................................. 46 5.1.1 Single transcription file per speaker ........................................................... 46 5.1.2 Phonemic inventory .................................................................................... 46 5.1.3 Clitic – the minimal syntactic unit transcribed ........................................... 49 5.1.3.1 Complex adverbial structures .............................................................. 51 5.1.4 Tokens versus types .................................................................................... 52 5.1.4.1 The F2F database ................................................................................. 53 5.1.4.2 The TEL database ................................................................................. 53 i 6 Prosodic boundary patterns ...................................................................................... 54 6.1 Boundary tones in spontaneous Israeli Hebrew ................................................ 54 6.1.1 T‐boundary tones ........................................................................................ 54 6.1.2 C‐boundary tones ........................................................................................ 54 6.1.3 Perceptual segmentation of IUs ................................................................. 56 6.1.4 Pauses ......................................................................................................... 57 6.1.5 An example of prosodic labeling and initial results .................................... 59 6.1.5.1 F2F annotation data ............................................................................ 60 6.1.5.2 TEL annotation data ............................................................................. 62 6.2 Phonetic realizations of continuous boundary tones ......................................... 63 6.2.1 Continuous Elongation (CE) boundary tones .............................................. 63 6.2.1.1 Term conversion .................................................................................. 64 6.2.1.2 A shift from disfluency to a prosodic pattern ...................................... 65 6.2.1.3 The phonetic realization of the CE boundary tone ............................. 70 6.2.2 Continuous Neutral (CN) boundary tones .................................................. 74 6.2.3 Continuous Rise (CR) boundary tones ........................................................ 75 6.2.4 Continuous Rise‐Fall (CRF) boundary tones ................................................ 76 6.2.5 Continuous Fall (CF) boundary tones .......................................................... 77 6.2.6 Syllable duration in various prosodic environments .................................. 78 7 Methodology .............................................................................................................. 82 7.1 Linear (n‐gram) analysis ...................................................................................... 82 7.2 The C‐boundary domain of analysis ................................................................... 82 7.2.1 Word order in spontaneous spoken Hebrew ............................................. 85 8 Results ........................................................................................................................ 89 8.1 Elements preceding C‐boundaries ...................................................................... 89 8.1.1 Clean‐up ...................................................................................................... 89 8.1.2 Elements preceding C‐boundaries: Findings .............................................. 90 8.2 Elements following C‐boundaries ....................................................................... 95 8.2.1 Clean‐up ...................................................................................................... 95 8.2.2 Elements following C‐boundaries: Findings ................................................ 96 ii 8.3 Dependencies over C‐boundaries ..................................................................... 100 8.3.1 Why examine both sides of the boundary? .............................................. 100 8.3.2 Results of dependencies over C‐boundaries ............................................ 102 8.4 Dependencies per C‐boundary ......................................................................... 106 8.4.1 Dependencies over the CE‐boundary tone ............................................... 106 8.4.2 Dependencies over the CN‐boundary tone .............................................. 107 8.4.3 Dependencies over the CR boundary tone ............................................... 109 8.4.4 Dependencies over the CRF boundary tone ............................................. 111 8.4.5 Dependencies over the CF boundary tone ............................................... 112 8.5 From POS to lexeme analysis – The preceding elements ................................. 112 8.5.1 Group A POS .............................................................................................. 113 8.5.1.1 POSS [Sel] 'of' ..................................................................................... 113 8.5.1.2 DEF [ha] 'the' ..................................................................................... 114 8.5.1.3 PREP‐DEF ........................................................................................... 115 8.5.1.4 SUB [SE] ............................................................................................. 116 8.5.1.5 Prepositions ....................................................................................... 116 8.5.1.6 Conjunctions ...................................................................................... 118 8.5.1.7 Personal pronouns ............................................................................. 121 8.5.1.8 Modifiers ............................................................................................ 124 8.5.1.9 BE ....................................................................................................... 125 8.5.1.10 AUX – Modal lexemes ........................................................................ 127 8.5.1.11 Existentials [jeS] 'there is' and [en] 'there is not' .............................. 127 8.5.1.12 Other POSs ......................................................................................... 129 8.5.2 Group B items ........................................................................................... 131 8.5.2.1 DM – Discourse markers
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prosodic Processes in Language and Music
    Prosodic Processes in Language and Music Maartje Schreuder Copyright © 2006 by Maartje Schreuder Cover design: Hanna van der Haar Printed by Print Partners Ipskamp, Enschede The work in this thesis has been carried out under the auspices of the Research School of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurosciences (BCN), Groningen Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 60 ISSN 0928-0030 ISBN 90-367-2637-9 RIJKSUNIVERSITEIT GRONINGEN Prosodic Processes in Language and Music Proefschrift ter verkrijging van het doctoraat in de Letteren aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen op gezag van de Rector Magnificus, dr. F. Zwarts, in het openbaar te verdedigen op donderdag 15 juni 2006 om 13:15 uur door Maartje Johanneke Schreuder geboren op 25 augustus 1974 te Groningen Promotor: Prof. dr. J. Koster Copromotor: Dr. D.G. Gilbers Beoordelingscommissie: Prof. dr. J. Hoeksema Prof. dr. C. Gussenhoven Prof. dr. P. Hagoort Preface Many people have helped me to finish this thesis. First of all I am indebted to my supervisor Dicky Gilbers. Throughout this disseration, I speak of ‘we’. That is not because I have some double personality which allows me to do all the work in collaboration, but because Dicky was so enthusiastic about the project that we did all the experiments together. The main chapters are based on papers we wrote together for conference proceedings, books, and journals. This collaboration with Dicky always was very motivating and pleasant. I will never forget the conferences we visited together, especially the fun we had trying to find our way in Vienna, and through the subterranean corridors in the castle in Imatra, Finland.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Theoretical Implications of Cypriot Greek Initial Geminates
    <LINK "mul-n*">"mul-r16">"mul-r8">"mul-r19">"mul-r14">"mul-r27">"mul-r7">"mul-r6">"mul-r17">"mul-r2">"mul-r9">"mul-r24"> <TARGET "mul" DOCINFO AUTHOR "Jennifer S. Muller"TITLE "On the theoretical implications of Cypriot Greek initial geminates"SUBJECT "JGL, Volume 3"KEYWORDS "geminates, representation, phonology, Cypriot Greek"SIZE HEIGHT "220"WIDTH "150"VOFFSET "4"> On the theoretical implications of Cypriot Greek initial geminates* Jennifer S. Muller The Ohio State University Cypriot Greek contrasts singleton and geminate consonants in word-initial position. These segments are of particular interest to phonologists since two divergent representational frameworks, moraic theory (Hayes 1989) and timing-based frameworks, including CV or X-slot theory (Clements and Keyser 1983, Levin 1985), account for the behavior of initial geminates in substantially different ways. The investigation of geminates in Cypriot Greek allows these differences to be explored. As will be demonstrated in a formal analysis of the facts, the patterning of geminates in Cypriot is best accounted for by assuming that the segments are dominated by abstract timing units such as X- or C-slots, rather than by a unit of prosodic weight such as the mora. Keywords: geminates, representation, phonology, Cypriot Greek 1. Introduction Cypriot Greek is of particular interest, not only because it is one of the few varieties of Modern Greek maintaining a consonant length contrast, but more importantly because it exhibits this contrast in word-initial position: péfti ‘Thursday’ vs. ppéfti ‘he falls’.Although word-initial geminates are less common than their word-medial counterparts, they are attested in dozens of the world’s languages in addition to Cypriot Greek.
    [Show full text]
  • Contrastive Modelling of the Intonation of Recapitulatory Echo Interrogative Sentences in Modern American English and Cuban Spanish
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Nottingham ePrints Garcia Romero, Gilberto (2013) Contrastive modelling of the intonation of recapitulatory echo interrogative sentences in modern American English and Cuban Spanish. MA(Res) thesis, University of Nottingham. Access from the University of Nottingham repository: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/13527/1/AN_INTONATIONAL_ANALYSIS_OF_THE_INTERR OGATIVE_SYSTEMS_IN_MODERN_ENGLISH_AND_CUBAN_SPANISH_2012.pdf Copyright and reuse: The Nottingham ePrints service makes this work by researchers of the University of Nottingham available open access under the following conditions. · Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. · To the extent reasonable and practicable the material made available in Nottingham ePrints has been checked for eligibility before being made available. · Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not- for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. · Quotations or similar reproductions must be sufficiently acknowledged. Please see our full end user licence at: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/end_user_agreement.pdf A note on versions: The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.
    [Show full text]
  • An Autosegmental/Metrical Analysis of Serbo-Croatian Intonation *
    AN AUTOSEGMENTAL/METRICAL ANALYSIS OF SERBO-CROATIAN INTONATION * Svetlana Godjevac Abstract Based on the qualitative analysis of the Fo contours of wide range ofutterances (broad focus declaratives, broad focus questions, nar­ row focus declaratives, narrow focus questions, vocative chant, and prompting intonation) utterred by nine native speakers, an autoseg­ mental/metrical analysis of Standard Selbo-Croatian intonation is pro­ posed. This analysis argues for sparse specification of tones, contra Inkelas and Zee (1988), and two levels of prosodic phrasing: the phonological word and the intonational phrase. The phonological word is defined in te!lDS of a lexical pitch accent and an initial word boundary tone, whereas the intonational phrase is a domain defined by pitch range manipulations (expansion, compression, reset, downstep) and final intonational phrase boundary_ tones. 1 Introduction Standard Serbo-Croatian (SC) is a pitch-accent language. All analyses (Browne & Mccawley 1965 (B&M), Inkelas & Zee 1988 (l&Z), Kostic 1983, Lehiste & Ivie 1963, •r would like to express my gratitude to Mary Beckman, Chris Barker, Allison Blodgett, Rebecca Her­ man, Molly Homer, Tsan Huang, Ilse Lehiste, Gina Taranto, and Pauline Welby. I also wish to thank my informants: Dragana Aleksic, Ljubomir Bjelica, Ana Devic, Ksenija Djuranovic, Svetislav Jovanovic, Jasna Kragalott, Svetlana Li.kic, and Branislav Unkovic for their patience and kindness in providing the data. All errors are mine. 79 . SVETLANA GODJEVAC 1986 (L&I), Nikolic 1970, Stevanovic 1989, Gvozdanovic (1980), inter alia) recognize four different types of accents: short falling, long falling, short rising, and long rising. In this paper I present an analysis of surface tones of these accent types in different sentential environments, including broad-focus and narrow-focu.s utterances, citation form, vocative chant, prompting intonation, and questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Automatic Prosodic Variations Modelling for Language and Dialect Discrimination Jean-Luc Rouas
    Automatic prosodic variations modelling for language and dialect discrimination Jean-Luc Rouas To cite this version: Jean-Luc Rouas. Automatic prosodic variations modelling for language and dialect discrimination. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2007, 15 (6), 10.1109/TASL.2007.900094. hal-00657977 HAL Id: hal-00657977 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00657977 Submitted on 9 Jan 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Automatic prosodic variations modelling for language and dialect discrimination Jean-Luc Rouas Abstract— This paper addresses the problem of modelling recognition [5], notably Adami’s system [6]. More recently, prosody for language identification. The aim is to create a system systems using syllable-scale features have been under research, that can be used prior to any linguistic work to show if prosodic although their aim is to model acoustic/phonotactic properties differences among languages or dialects can be automatically determined. In previous papers, we defined a prosodic unit, the of languages [7] or also prosodic cues [8]. pseudo-syllable. Rhythmic modelling has proven the relevance of Beside the use of prosody to improve the performances of the pseudo-syllable unit for automatic language identification.
    [Show full text]
  • Vowel Reduction Rds: an Instance of Foot Recursion? Or a Language-Specific Prosodic Unit? Introduction
    Reduction in in Phonology 2014, MIT! September 19-21 2014! ! Aleksei Nazarov! University of Massachusetts Amherst! [email protected] Outline Hypothesis: Dutch has prosodic domain larger than syllable, smaller than foot “Reduction Domain” (RD): full vowel σ + optional schwa σs Evidence from morphotactics and vowel reduction RDs: an instance of foot recursion? or a language-specific prosodic unit? Introduction English: only schwa in (non-word final) unstressed position ɑ̀gmɛ̀ntéɪʃən ~ ɑ̀gməntéɪʃən (after Pater 2000) Dutch: both full vowels and schwa in unstressed position má.jo.nɛ́:.zə "mayonnaise" má.jə.stɛ̀it "(Your) Majesty" Introduction Dutch standardly analyzed as a quantity- sensitive trochaic language (Oostendorp 1997 and references therein) LL-final words: penultimate main stress (mà.ka)(ró.ni) “macaroni” LH-final words: antepenultimate main stress le(ó.ni)(dɑ̀s) “Leonidas” Introduction Antepenultimate stress: Non-Finality forces stress to shift to penultimate foot if last syllable is heavy (Oostendorp 1997, references therein) This yields antepenultimate stress when the penult is light (i.e., a foot dependent) leonidɑs → le(ó.ni)(dɑ̀s); *le(ò.ni)(dɑ́́s) Introduction Reality of unstressed full vowels: If all full vowels were stressed, avoidance of final main stress could never yield antepenultimate stress leonidɑs → *le(ò)(ní)(dɑ̀s) leonidɑs ?→ le(ó)(nì)(dɑ̀s) Introduction Standard metrical analyses of Dutch: (mà.jo)(nɛ́:.zə) (má.jə)(stɛ̀it) Van der Hulst & Moortgat (1980) propose: Dutch has nested foot structure Smaller foot
    [Show full text]
  • ¡Nao I.11 .Uüw.Flhrts Ef... Rb» a Il En I. L
    fix a mw s ,r: ef... r .11 .uüw.flhrts‘ ¡nao I ; fix.L... , b» a Il En I. l aii?- «Wwflnrzk... BOLETIN DE LA ACADEMIA NACIONAL DE LA HISTORIA XXXIX 1966 Academia Nacional de la Historia San Martín 336 Buenos Aires Argentina BOLETÍN DE LA ACADEMIA NACIONAL DE LA HISTORIA Volumen XXXIX (1966) COMISIÓN DE PUBLICACIONES Director: Dr. José Luis Molinari Asesores: Dr. Milcíades A. Vígnati Prof. Ricardo Piccirilli Cnel. Augusto G. Rodríguez Dr. Ernesto I. Fine Mesa Directiva de la Academia Nacional de la Historia (1964 — 1966) DR. RIcARDO ZORRAQUíN BEcÚ Presidente DR. MILcíADEs ALEJO VIGNATI SR. RICARDO PIccIRILLI Vicepresidente 24’ Vicepresidente 1° DR. JOSÉ LUIs MOLINARI DR. ERNESTO J. FrrrE Tesorero Secretario SR. GUILLERMO GALLARDO CNIEL. AUGUSTO G. RODRÍGUEZ Protesorero Prosecretario ACADÉMICOS DE NÚMERO (*) DR. ENRIQUE RUIz-GUIÑAzÚ . .. 1921 DR. LEONcIO GIANELLO DR. ARTURO CAPDEvILA 1922 CORONEL AUGUSTO G. RODRícUEz 1955 DR. MIcUEL ANGEL CÁRcANO 1924 . ROBERTO LEvILLIER . .. 1955 DR. BENJAMIN VILLEGAS DR. ENRIQUE M. BARBA . .. 1955 BAsAvILBAsO 1926 . RICARDO ZORRAQUÍN BEcÚ .. 1955 DR. ENRIQUE DE GANDIA . .. 1930 . ARMANDO BRAUN MENÉNDEZ 1957 DR. MILcíADEs ALEJO VIGNATI . 1930 . JOSE LUIs MOLINARI . .. DR. JOSÉ IMBELLONI . 1937 . ATILIO CORNEJO . .. .°°‘<F".°" P9P!‘ R. l’. CUILLERRIO FURLONc . CARLOS R. MELO . .. CARDIFF S. J. .. 1938 SR. José A. ORíA . .. 1939 . EDMUNDO CORREAs NMNMNNMHHHH . BONIFACIO DEL CARRIL . .. SR. RICARDO R. CAILLEr-BOIs .. 1942 “QPPWPFPPWH? . ROBERTO ETCHEPAREBORDA .. SR. JULIO CÉSAR RAI-TO DE LA RETA . JULIO CÉSAR GONZÁLEZ SR. RICARDO PIccIRILLI . JOsE MARIA MARILUz CAP. DE NAvíO CONT. HUMBERTO URQUIJO . 1960 F. BURzIO . D . ERNESTO J. FITTE . S.E. CARDENAL DR. ANTONIO CAc­ SR. GUILLERMO GALLARDO .
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisition of Hebrew Phonoloy
    Pre-final version – comments are welcome To appear in: Berman, Ruth (ed.) Acquisition and Development of Hebrew: From Infancy to Adolescence. John Benjamins. PATHS AND STAGES IN THE ACQUISITION OF HEBREW PHONOLOGICAL WORD Avivit Ben-David & Outi Bat-El Hadassah Academic College & Tel-Aviv University The acquisition of Hebrew phonology has started gaining attention during the last two decades, with quantitative and theoretical studies on the distribution and development of various phonological structures. In this paper, we follow the acquisition of the phonological word in Hebrew, attending to the prosodic word (number of syllables), the foot (stress patterns), the syllable and its sub-syllabic units (onset and coda), and the segments and their features. For each type of phonological structure, we (a) provide distributional facts in Hebrew, in order to evaluate the role of frequency in phonological development; (b) discuss the constraints active during the different stages of development; and (c) introduce the simplification strategies children employ on their way to faithful targets. At the end we consider the resources children use during their phonological development. Key words: language acquisition, Hebrew, phonology, prosodic word, syllable, onset, coda, stress, trochaic bias, segments, features, frequency, nature vs. nurture. 1. Introduction When we start studying children’s language development, using phonetics as our data source, our first encounter with children’s grammar lies within the domain of phonology, i.e. the mental system that categorizes and organizes the phonetics of speech. Data and generalizations are approached from two angles: (a) the principles active in the children’s phonological system during every stage of development, and (b) the correspondence between the children’s productions and the adults’ targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosodic Structure and Intonation in Koasati
    PROSODIC STRUCTURE AND INTONATION IN KOASATI Matthew Gordona, Jack Martinb & Linda Langleyc aUniversity of California, Santa Barbara; bCollege of William & Mary; cMcNeese State University [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT 2. METHODOLOGY This paper provides a description of prosodic structure and intonational properties of Koasati, an This study is based on a combination of qualitative endangered Muskogean language spoken by observations about Koasati prosody made over approximately 300 people in Louisiana and Texas. several years of fieldwork on the language as well a Words in Koasati group into Accentual Phrases series of elicited recordings targeting particular (AP), which are characterized by an initial and final properties of the prosodic system for both qualitative high tone. Accentual Phrases in turn combine to and quantitative study. The targeted recordings form Intonational Phrases (IP), which are defined by consisted of elicited word lists and sentences a final boundary tone: L% (or for certain speakers recorded from multiple speakers (both male and LH%) in statements, H% in questions, and HL% in female) designed to illustrate the features of lexical commands. In addition to intonational tones, Koasati tone, phrasal intonation patterns, and prosodic also has tonal accents of three types. First, there is constituency. In addition, recordings of two lexical tone associated with certain nouns and certain narratives were consulted for further insight into verbal affixes. Second, tone is used morphologically intonation and prosodic structure. The primary data to convey aspectual distinctions in verbs. Finally, consulted were all recorded at a sampling rate of predictable accents may dock on the penultimate 44.1kHz onto a Marantz (PMD 661) solidstate syllable of the stem and on heavy syllables (those recorder using a handheld unidirectional Sennheiser containing a long vowel or a coda sonorant).
    [Show full text]
  • Epenthesis and Prosodic Structure in Armenian
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Epenthesis and prosodic structure in Armenian: A diachronic account A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Indo-European Studies by Jessica L. DeLisi 2015 © Copyright by Jessica L. DeLisi 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Epenthesis and prosodic structure in Armenian: A diachronic account by Jessica L. DeLisi Doctor of Philosophy in Indo-European Studies University of California, Los Angeles, 2015 Professor H. Craig Melchert, Chair In this dissertation I will attempt to answer the following question: why does Classical Armenian have three dierent reexes for the Proto-Armenian epenthetic vowel word- initially before old Proto-Indo-European consonant clusters? Two of the vowels, e and a, occur in the same phonological environment, and even in doublets (e.g., Classical ełbayr beside dialectal ałbär ‘brother’). The main constraint driving this asymmetry is the promotion of the Sonority Sequenc- ing Principle in the grammar. Because sibilants are more sonorous than stops, the promo- tion of the Sonority Sequencing Principle above the Strict Layer Hypothesis causes speak- ers to create a semisyllable to house the sibilant extraprosodically. This extraprosodic structure is not required for old consonant-resonant clusters since they already conform to the Sonority Sequencing Principle. Because Armenian has sonority-sensitive stress, the secondary stress placed on word-initial epenthetic vowels triggers a vowel change in all words without extraprosodic structure, i.e. with the old consonant-resonant clusters. Therefore Proto-Armenian */@łbayR/ becomes Classical Armenian [èł.báyR] ‘brother,’ but Proto-Armenian */<@s>tipem/ with extraprosodic <@s> becomes [<@s>.tì.pém] ‘I rush’ because the schwa is outside the domain of stress assignment.
    [Show full text]
  • PETER AUER a Note on Prosody in Natural Phonology
    Sonderdrucke aus der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg PETER AUER A note on prosody in natural phonology Originalbeitrag erschienen in: Julian Mendez Dosuma (Hrsg.): Naturalists at Krems: papers from the Workshop on Natural Phonology and Natural Morphology, (Krems, 1 - 7 July 1988). Salamanca: Ed. Univ. de Salamanca, 1990, S. 11-22 A Note on Prosody in Natural Phonology Peter Auer . Naturalness in Phonology: articulation/perception or cognition? The last 15 years have brought about dramatic changes in (Generative) Phonology; We have witnessed the times of segmental Generative Phonology coming to an end. Radically new conceptions of Phonology have developed. Instead of taking the input and output of Phonology as strings of linearly ordered segments, as it was the case in classical Generative Phonology, phonological units are now assumed to display an internal hierarchical organization; from year to year, the complexity of this internal organization seems to increase, and new research paradigms such as Autosegmental Phonology, Metrical Phonology, Prosodic Phonology, Dependency Phonology have developed and worked on phonological representations and models that have little to do with, say, SPE phonology. All of these new approaches make use of the theoretical insight that phonological data should be spread onto a number of levels or "tiers") This non-linear approach has made it possible to analyze suprasegmental phenomena, which by their very nature, spread beyond single phonological segments (such as tone, intonation, st0d, musical and pitch accent); in addition, phenomena hitherto considered to be in the realm of the segment turned out to be analyzable in a much more explanative way, when looked upon in the new paradigm - phenomena such as compensatory lengthening or assimilation.
    [Show full text]
  • Tense, Mood and Aspect in the Verbal System of Spoken Israeli Hebrew
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Languages in contact: preliminary clues of an emergence of an Israeli Arabic variety Dekel, N.; Brosh, H. Publication date 2012 Document Version Final published version Published in Journal of Arts and Humanities Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Dekel, N., & Brosh, H. (2012). Languages in contact: preliminary clues of an emergence of an Israeli Arabic variety. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 1(3), 1-17. http://www.theartsjournal.org/images/archive_articles/December2012/1.pdf General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:25 Sep 2021 Languages in contact: Preliminary clues of an emergence of an Israeli Arabic variety Nurit Dekel, PhD Senior Researcher in Linguistics Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication University of Amsterdam, Netherlands Hezi Brosh, PhD Professor of Arabic Languages and Cultures Department United States Naval Academy Annapolis ABSTRACT This paper describes from a linguistic point of view the impact of the Hebrew spoken in Israel on the Arabic spoken natively by Israeli Arabs.
    [Show full text]