Ornamental Trees & Shrubs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ornamental Trees & Shrubs 18-May-20 Tel: 083 419 0223 Email: [email protected] Web: www.thembatrees.co.za Bag Size 2.5L 10L 20L 40L 125L 200L 400L 1000L Diameter of Bag 12cm 20cm 30cm 42cm 50cm 80cm 90cm 1.2m Height of Bag 15cm 22cm 30cm 42cm 50cm 70cm 70cm 92cm ORNAMENTAL TREES & SHRUBS Plant name Common name 2.5litre 10litre 20litre 40litre 125litre 200litre 400litre 1000litre Afrocarpus falcatus Outeniqua Yellowwood 300 Betula pendula Silver Birch 11 51 1 Brachylaena discolor Coast Silver Oak 200 100 33 Celtis africana White Stinkwood 50 7 Celtis sinensis Chinese Hackberry 145 14 65 3 Combretum erythrophyllum River Bushwillow 450 78 Cupressus x leylandii Leylandii 600 100 Cussonia spicata Cabbage Tree 35 Dais cotinifolia Pompon Tree 5 244 Dodonaea angustifolia Sand Olive 145 6 Dombeya rotundifolia Wild Pear 79 Ekebergia capensis Cape Ash 297 40 Ficus natalensis Natal Fig 100 500 604 155 Ficus rubignosa Rusty Fig 175 2 3 25 Ginko biloba Ginko 14 Halleria lucida Tree Fuschia 70 Harpephyllum caffrum Wild Plum 60 180 Kiggelaria africana Wild Peach 70 Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum 200 12 80 21 Nuxia floribunda Forest Elder 70 100 55 Olea europaea africana Wild Olive 10 70 20 Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree 10 10 237 Populus lombardii Lombardii Poplar 400 100 45 Populus simonii Chinese Poplar 500 138 1 Quercus cerris Turkey Oak 200 1 Quercus incana Bluejack Oak 16 Quercus nigra Water Oak 300 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 400 4 28 2 Quercus robur English Oak 100 226 4 Quercus suber Cork Oak 30 Rapanea melanophloeas Cape Beech 12 Salix babylonica Weeping Willow 200 91 Salix matsudana 'Tortuosa' Corkscrew Willow 18 Salix mucronata Cape Willow 165 63 Searsia crenata Dune Crow-berry 1 Searsia lancea Black Karee 105 Searsia pendulina White Karee 100 192 4 Senegalia galpinii Monkey Thorn 58 110 Strelitzia nicolai Wild banana 1 Syzygium cordatum Water Berry 90 100 480 Syzygium guineense Water Pear 400 60 1 Syzygium paniculatum Magenta Cherry 80 100 Tarchonanthus camphoratus Camphor Tree 90 60 56 Taxodium distichum Bald Cypress 16 Ulmus parvifolia Chinese Elm 12 Vachellia karroo Sweet Thorn 22 24 45 Vachellia sieberiana var. woodii Paperbark 115 10 1 Vachellia xanthophloea Fever Tree 295 100 100 121 159 Vepris lanceolata White Ironwood 50 Viburnum tinus 'Compactum' Laurustinus 50 40 Viburnum tinus 'Lucidum' Laurustinus 70 Virgilia divaricata Keurboom 50 Ziziphus mucronata Buffalo Thorn 20 FRUIT & NUT TREES Plant name Common name 2.5litre 10litre 20litre 40litre 125litre 200litre 400litre 1000litre Citrus × aurantiifolia Tahiti Bearss Lime 400 69 Citrus x clementina Marisol Clementine 140 Citrus x limon Cape Rough Lemon 2 Citrus x limon Eureka Lemon 1000 80 165 Citrus x paradisi Star Ruby Grapefruit 30 10 Citrus x reticulata Nova Mandarin 80 Citrus x sinensis Palmer Navel Orange 45 154 11 Citrus x sinensis Valentia Orange 4 Citrus x sinensis Washington Navel Orange 20 232 Citrus unshiu Mihowase Satsuma 6 Citrus unshiu Novelty Naartjie 10 Ficus carica var. avignon Avignon Fig 3 Ficus carica var. green Green Fig 2 Ficus carica var. parisian Parisian Fig 2 2 Ficus carica var. white genoa White Genoa Fig 1 9 Ficus carica var. tangiers Tangier fig 2 Malus domestica Cripps Red Apple 30 Malus domestica Granny Smith Apple 5 20 Olea kalamata Kalamata Olive 300 6 Olea leccino Leccino Olive 8 Olea mission Mission Olive 15 Prunus avium Cherry 2 Prunus domestica - PLUM Cross pollinators Fortune SAPPHIRE Sapphire HARRY PICKSTONE D'Agen prune SELF 9 Van der Merwe prune SELF Pyrus communis - PEAR Cross pollinators Bon Chretien BEAURRE BOSC 4 Kieffer PACKHAMS 12 Packham ROSEMARIE 23 34 14 3 Rosemarie PACKHAMS 5 2 12 Prunus dulcis - ALMOND Cross pollinators Texas Mission NON PAREIL 28 Non Pareil PEERLESS / NU PLUS ULTRA 101 Peerless NON PAREIL 64 34 Prunus persica Peach Elberta 12 Prunus persica Peach Kakamas 1 Prunus persica Peach Sandvliet 8 Prunus persica Peach Summer Sun 11 10 Prunus persica Dessert Peach Suncrest 6 Prunus persica Nectarine Fiesta 18 Prunus persica Nectarine Mar. Pride 20 Prunus persica Nectarine Mayglo 1 Prunus persica Nectarine Donnarine 1 Punica granatum Pomegranate 100 90 RARE & FLOWERING TREES Plant name Common name 2.5litre 10litre 20litre 40litre 125litre Acer palmatum Japanese Maple 25 1 Acer palmatum var. dissectum 4 Fagus sylvatica Green Beech 29 Liriodendron tulipiflora Tulip Tree 1 Magnolia x soulangeana Saucer Magnolia 180 Malus floribunda Japanese Crabapple 20 Malus x purpurea Crabapple 17 Malus sieboldii Toringo Crabapple 20 Malus spectabilis Chinese Crab 20 Malus topsy white Topsy White Crabapple 44 Prunus cerasifera 'Nigra' Black Cherry Plum 8 Prunus serrulata Amanogawa - pale pink, double blossom 3 Prunus serrulata Mammoth Rose - dark pink, double blossom 20 5 Prunus serrulata Subhirtella Weeping - pale pink 8 Prunus serrulata Takasago - pale pink, semi-double blossom 1 Prunus serrulata Ukon - greenish pale pink flower 8.
Recommended publications
  • Exploring the Benefits and Challenges of Indigenous Foods in an African Context Using a Case Study of Community Gardens in the Western Cape of South Africa
    Exploring the benefits and challenges of indigenous foods in an African context using a case study of community gardens in the Western Cape of South Africa by Francia-Marié de Bruin Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Of Master of Philosophy in Sustainable Development in the Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Dr Laura Pereira Co-Supervisor: Catherine (Loubie) Rusch March 2018 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third-party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: March 2018 Copyright © 2018 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved i | P a g e Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract Research suggests that the benefits and value of indigenous foods within the South African context have not been fully utilised. Their potential value to the South African food system and food security which is embedded within it, could be enhanced were their benefits to be explored more comprehensively. Therefore, the aim of this research was to systematically review literature using relevant search criteria and databases relating to underutilised indigenous crop species and foods in Africa as well as abroad (including the Oceania, South America and Asia). The intention was to provide an encompassing overview of both literature and literature gaps regarding nutritional, environmental, economic, and social-cultural benefits and challenges of indigenous food plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Cintia Luz.Pdf
    Cíntia Luíza da Silva Luz Filogenia e sistemática de Schinus L. (Anacardiaceae), com revisão de um clado endêmico das matas nebulares andinas Phylogeny and systematics of Schinus L. (Anacardiaceae), with revision of a clade endemic to the Andean cloud forests Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo, para obtenção de Título de Doutor em Ciências, na Área de Botânica. Orientador: Dr. José Rubens Pirani São Paulo 2017 Luz, Cíntia Luíza da Silva Filogenia e sistemática de Schinus L. (Anacardiaceae), com revisão de um clado endêmico das matas nebulares andinas Número de páginas: 176 Tese (Doutorado) - Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo. Departamento de Botânica. 1. Anacardiaceae 2. Schinus 3. Filogenia 4. Taxonomia vegetal I. Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto de Biociências. Departamento de Botânica Comissão julgadora: ______________________________ ______________________________ Prof(a). Dr.(a) Prof(a). Dr.(a) ______________________________ ______________________________ Prof(a). Dr.(a) Prof(a). Dr.(a) _____________________________________ Prof. Dr. José Rubens Pirani Orientador Ao Luciano Luz, pelo entusiasmo botânico, companheirismo e dedicação aos Schinus Esta é a estória. Ia um menino, com os tios, passar dias no lugar onde se construía a grande cidade. Era uma viagem inventada no feliz; para ele, produzia-se em caso de sonho. Saíam ainda com o escuro, o ar fino de cheiros desconhecidos. A mãe e o pai vinham trazê-lo ao aeroporto. A tia e o tio tomavam conta dele, justínhamente. Sorria-se, saudava-se, todos se ouviam e falavam. O avião era da companhia, especial, de quatro lugares. Respondiam-lhe a todas as perguntas, até o piloto conversou com ele.
    [Show full text]
  • The Monophyly of Bursera and Its Impact for Divergence Times of Burseraceae
    TAXON 61 (2) • April 2012: 333–343 Becerra & al. • Monophyly of Bursera The monophyly of Bursera and its impact for divergence times of Burseraceae Judith X. Becerra,1 Kogi Noge,2 Sarai Olivier1 & D. Lawrence Venable3 1 Department of Biosphere 2, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, U.S.A. 2 Department of Biological Production, Akita Prefectural University, Akita 010-0195, Japan 3 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, U.S.A. Author for correspondence: Judith X. Becerra, [email protected] Abstract Bursera is one of the most diverse and abundant groups of trees and shrubs of the Mexican tropical dry forests. Its interaction with its specialist herbivores in the chrysomelid genus Blepharida, is one of the best-studied coevolutionary systems. Prior studies based on molecular phylogenies concluded that Bursera is a monophyletic genus. Recently, however, other molecular analyses have suggested that the genus might be paraphyletic, with the closely related Commiphora, nested within Bursera. If this is correct, then interpretations of coevolution results would have to be revised. Whether Bursera is or is not monophyletic also has implications for the age of Burseraceae, since previous dates were based on calibrations using Bursera fossils assuming that Bursera was paraphyletic. We performed a phylogenetic analysis of 76 species and varieties of Bursera, 51 species of Commiphora, and 13 outgroups using nuclear DNA data. We also reconstructed a phylogeny of the Burseraceae using 59 members of the family, 9 outgroups and nuclear and chloroplast sequence data. These analyses strongly confirm previous conclusions that this genus is monophyletic.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary: Monitoring for Sustainable Indigenous Forest
    MONITORING FOR SUSTAINABLE INDIGENOUS FOREST MANAGEMENT IN THE GARDEN ROUTE NATIONAL PARK Knysna 2014 ii CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 FOREST DYNAMICS MONITORING 2 2.1 Diepwalle Research Areas 2 2.2 Tsitsikamma strip plots 3 2.3 Permanent Sample Plots (PSPs) in nature reserves 3 2.4 National system of forest plots 3 3 FOREST DISTURBANCE AND RECOVERY 4 3.1 Gap dynamics research 5 3.2 Storms River big tree 5 3.3 Photo-monitoring of burnt forest 6 3.4 Koomansbos fire gap 7 3.5 Forest establishment 7 3.6 Forest succession on a burnt forest margin 7 4 UTILISATION OF FOREST PRODUCTS 8 4.1 Timber utilization 8 Permanent sample plots (PSPs) 9 Post-harvesting audit 11 4.2 Ferns 12 4.3 Bulbine 13 4.4 Bark 13 5 PLANT SPECIES OF CONSERVATION CONCERN 14 6 BLACKWOOD 15 6.1 Incidence of spread monitoring 15 6.2 Success of control action monitoring 16 6.3 Harkerville blackwood plot 16 iii 7 FAUNA 16 7.1 Antelope population monitoring 16 7.2 Rare mammal monitoring 16 7.3 Crowned eagle monitoring 17 7.4 The Knysna elephants 18 8 CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 19 9 SOCIAL MONITORING 19 9.1 Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment 19 9.2 Employment Equity 19 9.3 People and Conservation Park Based Education and Youth Development Programmes 20 9.4 Expanded Public Works Programmes (EPWP’s) 20 10 WASTE DISPOSAL 20 10.1 Hazardous waste 20 10.2 Household waste 21 11 CHEMICAL USAGE 21 12 COSTS, PRODUCTIVITY AND EFFICIENCY OF FOREST MANAGEMENT 21 13 CONCLUSION 22 APPENDIX 1: HARVEST TREE SELECTION CRITERIA APPLIED IN THE INDIGENOUS FORESTS OF THE GARDEN ROUTE NATIONAL PARK 23 APPENDIX 2: TREE LIST FOR THE INDIGENOUS FORESTS OF THE GARDEN ROUTE 24 1 1 INTRODUCTION The Garden Route National Park (GRNP) consists of a mosaic of diverse terrestrial, freshwater, estuarine and marine ecosystems, landscapes, and cultural heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Search and Rescue Plan
    Bayview Wind Farm PLANT SEACRH AND RESCUE PLAN Prepared for: Bayview Wind Power (Pty) Ltd Building 1 Country Club Estate, 21 Woodlands Drive, Woodmead, 2191. Prepared by: EOH Coastal and Environmental Services 76 Regent Road, Sea Point With offices in East London, Johannesburg, Grahamstown and Port Elizabeth (South Africa) www.cesnet.co.za August 2018 Plant Search and Rescue Plan This Report should be cited as follows: EOH Coastal & Environmental Services, August 2018, Bayview Search and Rescue Plan, CES, Cape Town. COPYRIGHT INFORMATION This document contains intellectual property and propriety information that are protected by copyright in favour of EOH Coastal & Environmental Services (CES) and the specialist consultants. The document may therefore not be reproduced, used or distributed to any third party without the prior written consent of CES. The document is prepared exclusively for submission to the Bayview Wind Energy Facility (PTY) Ltd in the Eastern Cape, and is subject to all confidentiality, copyright and trade secrets, rules intellectual property law and practices of South Africa. Coastal & Environmental Services i Bayview Wind Farm AUTHORS Ms Tarryn Martin, Senior Environmental Consultant and Botanical Specialist (Pri.Sci.Nat.) Tarryn holds a BSc (Botany and Zoology), a BSc (Hons) in African Vertebrate Biodiversity and an MSc with distinction in Botany from Rhodes University. Tarryn’s Master’s thesis examined the impact of fire on the recovery of C3 and C4 Panicoid and non-Panicoid grasses within the context of climate change for which she won the Junior Captain Scott-Medal (Plant Science) for producing the top MSc of 2010 from the South African Academy of Science and Art as well as an Award for Outstanding Academic Achievement in Range and Forage Science from the Grassland Society of Southern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded on 6 September 2014
    Changes in diet resource use by elephants, Loxodonta africana, due to changes in resource availability in the Addo Elephant National Park. by Jana du Toit Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magister Scientiae in the Faculty of Science at the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University. 2015 Supervisor: Prof G. I. H. Kerley Co-supervisor: Dr. M. Landman DECLARATION I, Jana du Toit (student number: 214359328), hereby declare that the dissertation for the qualification of Magister Scientiae (Zoology), is my own work and that it has not previously been submitted for assessment or completion of any postgraduate qualification to another University or for another qualification. Faecal samples and forage availability estimates were collected by Dr. M. Landman and her team. Diet quality analysis was done by CEDARA Feed Laboratory, and DNA metabarcoding was done by Dr. P. Taberlet and his team at the Labortoire d’Ecologie Alpine. J. du Toit i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my deepest gratitude and appreciation to the following people, without whom the completion of this dissertation would not have been possible: This study was funded by a bursary through Prof. Graham Kerley, for which I am deeply thankful. I’d also like to thank SANParks for the opportunity to work in the Addo Elephant National Park, as well as the Mazda Wildlife Fund for providing transport. To my supervisors, Prof. Graham Kerley and Dr. Marietjie Landman, thank you for the opportunity to work on this project, your assistance, support and sharing your knowledge with me. Your strive for excellence motivated me throughout this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Reserve Management Plan
    INTEGRATED RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN ZANDVLEI ESTUARY NATURE RESERVE June 2011 AUTHORIZATION PAGE This Integrated Management Plan for the Zandvlei Estuary Nature Reserve was drafted by the Area Manager and recommended by the Reserve Planning Team, a multi-disciplinary team consisting of: Reserve Planning Team: Branch Manager, Regional Manager, Area Manager, Biophysical Specialist, Biodiversity Coordinator, Sustainable Resource Specialist and Monitoring and Evaluation Coordinator _____________________________________ Casandra Sheasby – Area Manager Biodiversity Management Branch Environmental Resource Management Department City of Cape Town Name and Title Signature and Date Mr Jacob Hugo Executive Director: Economic, Environment and Spatial Planning Directorate Approved by: Name and Title Signature and Date Mr Anton Bredell Minister of Local Government, Environmental Affairs and Development Planning DOCUMENTED Integrated Reserve Management Plan This management plan replaces any previous versions Document Version: Prepared by: Adele Pretorius Version.02: June 2011 Responsibility: Reserve Management plans Document reference: Approved by: Mr Anton Bredell (DEA&DP reference to be Position: Minister of Local Government, Environmental inserted) Affairs and Development Planning Date of approval: Date of implementation : Immediate Distribution: Distribute as Reserve Management Plan to relevant staff in the City of Cape Town for immediate implementation. Date for Revision: June 2016 INTEGRATED RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN Compiled by Dalton Gibbs, Vaughn Thompson and Cassandra Sheasby Biodiversity Management Branch Environmental Resource Management Department City of Cape Town ZANDVLEI ESTUARY NATURE RESERVE June 2011 ISBN NUMBER TABLE OF CONTENTS PART SECTIONS AND SUBSECTIONS PAGE NUMBER NUMBER List of maps ii List of figures ii List of tables ii List of appendices iii List of abbreviations used iv Part 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcoding and Phylogenetic Analysis of Searsia
    Poster ID : 828 DNA barcoding and phylogenetic analysis of Searsia Makhado Tshililo, Michelle van der Bank and Sanele N. S. Shiba The African Centre for DNA Barcoding (ACDB), Department of Botany & Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, South Africa ABSTRACT Background. The family Anacardiaceae includes approximately 800 species in 82 genera. Rhus L. is the largest and most widely distributed genus in Anacardiaceae. However, controversy has surrounded the delimitation of the genus. Searsia F.A. Barkley was originally included into the Rhus complex but recent molecular studies have separated it along with six other genera from the Rhus complex and recognised them as separate genera. The genus Searsia, which is the focus of the current study, is represented by approximately 120 species and is widely distributed in Africa with only three species currently known from Asia. Here we include an extensive sampling and molecular analyses of Searsia species across its distribution range in Africa to access the relationships within the genus. Results. In total 205 taxa, representing 35 species of Searsia, were sequenced for the core barcoding regions (matK and rbcLa) along with additional markers, i.e. ITS, ETS, trnL-F and ndhF. Significance. This study contributes a first large sampling of Searsia. An infrageneric classification for the genus will be presented. Anacardium occidentale AY594459 Anacardium occidentale OM3645 Anacardium occidentale GH0152 Trichoscypha acuminata MPADN0277 Trichoscypha arborea MPADN0003Anacardium excelsum GQ9
    [Show full text]
  • Illustration Sources
    APPENDIX ONE ILLUSTRATION SOURCES REF. CODE ABR Abrams, L. 1923–1960. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. ADD Addisonia. 1916–1964. New York Botanical Garden, New York. Reprinted with permission from Addisonia, vol. 18, plate 579, Copyright © 1933, The New York Botanical Garden. ANDAnderson, E. and Woodson, R.E. 1935. The species of Tradescantia indigenous to the United States. Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Reprinted with permission of the Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University. ANN Hollingworth A. 2005. Original illustrations. Published herein by the Botanical Research Institute of Texas, Fort Worth. Artist: Anne Hollingworth. ANO Anonymous. 1821. Medical botany. E. Cox and Sons, London. ARM Annual Rep. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1889–1912. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis. BA1 Bailey, L.H. 1914–1917. The standard cyclopedia of horticulture. The Macmillan Company, New York. BA2 Bailey, L.H. and Bailey, E.Z. 1976. Hortus third: A concise dictionary of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. Revised and expanded by the staff of the Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. Reprinted with permission from William Crepet and the L.H. Bailey Hortorium. Cornell University. BA3 Bailey, L.H. 1900–1902. Cyclopedia of American horticulture. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. BB2 Britton, N.L. and Brown, A. 1913. An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada and the British posses- sions. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York. BEA Beal, E.O. and Thieret, J.W. 1986. Aquatic and wetland plants of Kentucky. Kentucky Nature Preserves Commission, Frankfort. Reprinted with permission of Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Thembalethu Upgraded Informal Settlement Project (Uisp): Bulk Services Terrestrial Fauna & Flora Specialist Study for Basic
    THEMBALETHU UPGRADED INFORMAL SETTLEMENT PROJECT (UISP): BULK SERVICES TERRESTRIAL FAUNA & FLORA SPECIALIST STUDY FOR BASIC ASSESSMENT DEA&DP Ref No: 16/3/1/1/D2/50/0060/12 PRODUCED FOR CAPE EAPRAC ON BEHALF OF GEORGE MUNICIPALITY BY [email protected] September 2013 THEMBALETHU UISP – Bulk Services & Area 8A/B CONTENTS Declaration of Consultants’ Independence .............................................................................................. 4 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Scope of Study............................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Assessment Approach & Philosophy............................................................................................. 9 1.3 Relevant Aspects of the Development........................................................................................ 11 2 Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 14 2.1 Data Sourcing and Review .......................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Site Visit......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A 25,000 Year Record of Climate and Vegetation Change from the Southwestern Cape Coast, South Africa
    Quaternary Research (2021), 1–18 doi:10.1017/qua.2021.31 Research Article A 25,000 year record of climate and vegetation change from the southwestern Cape coast, South Africa Lynne J. Quicka* , Brian M. Chaseb,c, Andrew S. Carrd, Manuel Chevaliere, B. Adriaan Groblera and Michael E. Meadowsc,f,g aAfrican Centre for Coastal Palaeoscience, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape 6031, South Africa; bInstitut des Sciences de l’Evolution- Montpellier (ISEM), University of Montpellier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France; cDepartment of Environmental and Geographical Science, University of Cape Town, South Lane, Upper Campus, 7701 Rondebosch, South Africa; dSchool of Geography, Geology and the Environment, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK; eInstitut für Geowissenschaften und Meteorologie, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms- Universität Bonn, Auf dem Hügel 20, 53121 Bonn, Germany; fSchool of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, 500 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai 200241, PR China and gCollege of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, PR China Abstract The southwestern Cape of South Africa is a particularly dynamic region in terms of long-term climate change. We analysed fossil pollen from a 25,000 year sediment core taken from a near-coastal wetland at Pearly Beach that revealed that distinct changes in vegetation com- position occurred along the southwestern Cape coast. From these changes, considerable variability in temperature and moisture availability are inferred. Consistent with indications from elsewhere in southwestern Africa, variability in Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) was identified as a strong determinant of regional climate change. At Pearly Beach, this resulted in phases of relatively drier con- ditions (∼24–22.5 cal ka BP and ∼22–18 cal ka BP) demarcated by brief phases of increased humidity from ∼24.5–24 cal ka BP and 22.5–22 cal ka BP.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Specialist Report for Kleinfontein Kalkmyn, Kouga Municipality, Eastern Cape
    Botanical Specialist Report for Kleinfontein Kalkmyn, Kouga Municipality, Eastern Cape Clayton Weatherall-Thomas 1 Lelane, 14 Cathcart Rd, Humewood, Port Elizabeth, 6070 E-mail [email protected] 18 April 2019 Cell. 083 401 8091 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Details of Specialist and Declaration of Interest ...................................................... 1 Project Description .................................................................................................. 1 Terms of Reference ................................................................................................ 3 Assumptions and Limitations .................................................................................. 4 2 Methods ......................................................................................................................... 4 3 Study Site Description .................................................................................................... 8 National Context ..................................................................................................... 8 3.1.1 National Vegetation Assessment ..................................................................... 8 3.1.2 Threatened Ecosystems ................................................................................ 10 3.1.3 National Freshwater Ecosystem Priority Areas Project .................................. 10 Regional Context .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]