DOCSLIB.ORG

EV Bus for Indonesia's Public Transportation Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EV Bus for Indonesia's Public Transportation Future 6/26/2019 EV Bus for Indonesia’s Public Transportation Future EANET e-Mobility Awareness Forum – 26 June 2019 1 Brief History 2 1 6/26/2019 Products Range 3 Customers Automotive Customers Non-Automotive Customers 4 2 6/26/2019 Corporate Objectives in EV Project To address the need to utilize Renewable Energy to replace the Fossil Fuel as main source of energy To address the need to reduce carbon emission for the sake of better and healthier future of the next generation To address the need for decreasing oil fuel import as Indonesia is a net importer of oil fuel country To address the need to introduce electric bus as one of the best mass transportation solution in for the future which could reduce the pollution and improving fuel usage efficiency As the the future business direction and new strategic expansion of Bakrie Autoparts 5 Reason for Choosing Electric Bus Venture Can reduce the carbon emission 04 significantly as they will be operated in highly densed and poluted environment Electric bus technology can be applied easily. Assembly process is not very 02 complicated. 04 Bakrie Autoparts has tremendous experience in Commercial Vehicle components production Bus is mass transportation method 01 whch can be enjoyed by various social strata 20 6 3 6/26/2019 China, World’s Leader in EV Sources: IEA (International Energy Agency) analysis based on country submissions, complemented by ACEA (2018); EAFO (2018a). 7 BYD main highlights The only EV producer who is having the patent in all four main core Founded in 1995, BYD now is the components (batteries, electric motors, biggest producer of EV in the world 1 2 electronic controls & charging infrastructure) 220,000 employees, 30 Commmitted to support local 6 3 content and local industries manufacturing plants worldwide more than 20 years experience in Delivered more than 35,000 electric 5 4 batteries R&D and manufacturing, buses to 50 countries in the world world biggest producer of iron- phosphate batteries 8 4 6/26/2019 Stake Holders BA Users / Project BYD Operators Owner • Electric Bus & • Transportation • Fleet owner • Route owner Charging Station Solution • Fleet day to day • Supporting Products and • APM & Distributor operation infrastructure (BRT Technology provider • After Sales Services lanes, bus stops) • Charging Station provider Provider 9 Development Stages Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Technological Market Penetration Initial Full Commercialization Demonstration • CBU units Commercialization / Industrilization • CBU units • CBU chassis • CKD / IKD • Local Body • Local chassis • Local Components Assembly • Local Content ~ 40% • Local Body production • Local Components • Local Content ~ 60% 10 5 6/26/2019 EV Progress • Product Introduction and Servicing IMF / World Bank Conference, Bali October 2018. • Electric Bus introduction to Central Java 01 Government & ITDC • Strategic Partnership with Nusantara • Member of Gaikindo Gemilang (Body Builder), Pahala Kencana 02 (Operator) and APM Auto Component • MOU with BYD for Trans Jakarta for Indonesia (components maker) Electric Bus Trial Activity. • Display of BYD buses at Trans Jakarta 03 Stand during BusWorld Indonesia 2019 • MOU with Pahala Kencana, DAMRI & PPD for BRT and non • Launching of Trans Jakarta 04 BRT Projects electric bus trial by Governor of Jakarta. • Socialization programs of 05 Electric Bus for Trans Jakarta passengers as instructed by Governor of DKI 11 Socialization of EV Buses – IMF Conference and Trans Jakarta Trial May – June 2019 • Total Operational hour: 157 hours • Total distance travelled: 1,156 km • Total passengers carried: 13,277 people 12 6 6/26/2019 Obtained Data K9RA C6 Length x Width (m) 12 x 2.5 7.4 x 2 Parameter: • Charging station: Gross Weight (kg) 16,250 9,100 82,500 VA (82,5 kW) • Data Obtainment: Top Speed (kmh) 70 120 12 -1 5 October 2018 Seat capacity 33 + 2 24 + 1 • Traffic Condition: Stop and Go at least Battery capacity (kWh) 324 138 75% Distance travel per 1% Battery Capacity (km) 2.95 4.40 Full Battery Range (km) 295 440 Cost per km* (USD) 0.15 0.08 • Electricity Cost: USD 0.12/ kWh (non subsidized rate). Subsidized rate: USD 0.07 / kWh • As comparison, cost per km of K9 using subsidized diesel rate is around USD 0.19 per km. Ratte 13 Next Steps • Order completion of trial units for PK, DAMRI, PPD and Kopaja • Commencement of next phase trial • Commencing Trans Jakarta Trial Activity with K9 & C6 • MOU with Kopaja and • Ordering and production of • Finalize Homologation others Private Fleets / more trial units (High Floor) Process for K9RA & C6 Bus Operators 14 7 6/26/2019 Challenges Homologations 02 Regulations 01 Commercials Target 03 Infrastructure04 Localizations 05 15 Challenges • No Framework Regulations (Presidential Decree not yet released) • No Clear Road Map or Guides for EV • No Incentives in required area 01 • No clear jurisdiction • No Specific Standard for EV • ICE Homologations Process / Standards are still being used such as engine 02 capacity, horsepower requirement, vehicle weight • No equipment to test EV features such as battery • Commercial parameters of ICE vehicles are still being used or targeted, for example the price per km target, ROI period etc. 03 • Intangible benefits of EV not yet quantified. • Lack of support from the Banks in getting leasing • Unclear guidance and no coordination on providing infrastructure , for 04 example in providing electricity power for charging structure • Highest electricity rate (non subsidized category) • Difficult to fulfill localization requirements such as to produce the 05 battery locally after certain period of time 16 8 6/26/2019 Supports Required Commitment from the Government in coming out with regulations, guidance and incentives policies Support and Advisory from International Organization, such as UN Environment in advising and getting commitment from Government Support from Financial Institutions for financial / leasing facilities Support & Understanding from EV Principle 17 Thank you 18 9.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BAB IV HASIL DAN PEMBAHASAN A. Sejarah Perusahaan Sejak
    BAB IV HASIL DAN PEMBAHASAN A. Sejarah Perusahaan Sejak berdirinya pada tahun 1993, Pahala memainkan peran penting di Indonesia dalam industri pengiriman ekspres. Sebagai anggota pengiriman perusahaan Asosiasi Perusahaan Jasa Ekspres Indonesia (asperindo) menyediakan kargo dan logistik ke seluruh Indonesia dan Luar Negeri. Pahala adalah anggota Pahala Group yang juga termasuk Pahala Kencana transportasi dan Pahala wisata. Pahala memulai di Kudus Jawa Tengah pada tahun 1976 di mana jasa transportasi darat kami mulai berkembang pesat sehigga pada tahun 1993 dipercayakan Pahala Kencana untuk didirikan. Dengan adanya beberapa cabang dan agen penjualan di Sumatra, Jawa, Madura, dan Bali pada tahun 2003 perusahaan dengan cepat tumbuh untuk menutupi lebih dari 400 tujuan di Indonesia bersama dengan 200 negara di seluruh dunia, didukung oleh ratusan armada transportasi. Saat ini, Pahala mengungkapkan dengan kisaran luas jaringan di Indonesia dipercaya untuk memberikan ribuan konsinyasi setiap minggu, ini bisa dimungkinkan hanya karena kepercayaan pelanggan, iman , kehandalan, kecepatan, efisiensi dan pengiriman tepat waktu. Pada tahun 2006 Pahala memiliki dorongan untuk berubah menjadi lebih profesional dengan PT. Pahala Express mengungkapkan sebagai nama merek baru PT. Pahala Express, perusahaan telah mengembangkan model positioning yang positif dalam waktu pengiriman ekspres. PT. Pahala yakin bahwa meningkatkan kepuasan pelanggan dan layanan terpadu yang dapat dipercaya adalah kunci untuk mencapai posisinya sebagai perusahaan pengiriman ekspres terkemuka di Indonesia. Di dalam perkembangan situasi pergerakan bisnis yang dinamis memacu Pahala Kencana untuk membuka beberapa bidang usaha baru, antara lain : Pada tahun 1993 PT. Pahala Kencana mendirikan Jasa Titipan Pahala Kencana yang kini berubah nama menjadi Pahala Express dan di tahun yang sama Biro Perjalanan Wisata PT.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Failure in Jakarta Public Bus Transport
    Faculty of Economic Sciences, Communication and IT Doddy Hendra Wijaya SERVICE FAILURE IN JAKARTA PUBLIC BUS TRANSPORT Service Science Project Report Date/Term: Spring 2009 Supervisors: Bo Enquist Samuel Petros Sebhatu Karlstads Universitets 651 88 Karlstad Tfn 054-700 10 00 Fax 054-700 14 60 [email protected] www.kau.se 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background Populations in most developing countries are increasing much faster than car ownership levels and therefore an increasing proportion of the population is dependent on public transport except for very short journeys. In most countries, walking is the most common mode of travel for distances of up to one or two kilometers in urban areas and much further in rural areas. Those who own bicycles tend to use them for journeys of up to about eight kilometers, beyond which public transport is preferred mode. Public transport also provides an alternative to those who have private transport, but are sometimes deterred from using it by traffic congestion, parking difficulties or problems in accessing certain streets, although in practice it is relatively unusual, particularly in developing countries, for car owners to use public transport to any significant extent. However, in many developing countries families tend to be large, so that even if these is a car belonging to a household, most members of the family are still likely to use public transport for at least some of their travel (Iles 2005) Public transport is therefore vital for the vast majority without access to private transport. There is need for personal mobility, in particular for access to employment opportunities, but with low income levels affordability is a common problem, while the services provided are often regarded as inadequate.
    [Show full text]
  • Title of the Document
    Underage drivers rule the road by night “It’s not that hard once you’ve got it moving,” says Andi Ilham as he powers a lurching Metro Mini at high speed down a Jakarta street late at night. The No. 75 bus that he drives most nights, plying the popular route between Blok M and Pasar Minggu in South Jakarta, is one of a fleet of 13 that belongs to a distant relative, through whom Andi got the job. He says he started out as a conductor on one of the Metro Minis, and gradually learned how to drive the heavy, smoke-belching bus. Neatly dressed in a button-down checked shirt and jeans, and wearing closed shoes, Andi is not your typical Metro Mini driver. That’s because he’s only 16 years old. Too young to apply for a driver’s license or even an ID card — the minimum age for both is 17 — Andi has been driving Metro Minis since he was 15. He claims to be one of a growing number of underage sopir tembak — illegal drivers who fill in for the regular drivers, usually at night, when the streets are less crowded and the police not as likely to pull buses over for traffic infractions. While no government figures are available, the claim may hold water. When the Jakarta Globe visited Blok M, Senen and Manggarai bus terminals over several nights last week, many of the Metro Mini and Kopaja drivers admitted to being between 14 and 17 years old. These drivers, none of whom had a license, operate buses serving some of the most frequented routes, including Blok M to Ciledug, Manggarai to Pasar Minggu and Senen to Lebak Bulus.
    [Show full text]
  • Jakarta's Bus Rapid Transit System Indonesia
    Jakarta’s Bus Rapid Transit System CASE STUDY Indonesia | March 2016 "Transport in Asia and the Pacific faces a web of issues that need a strategic solution... Countries across the region have to contend with road safety, air pollution, social sustainability, climate change impacts, lack of public financing, decrepit infrastructure, and even cross-border bottlenecks, among others.” - James Leather, Co-Chair, ADB Transport Community of Practice Hoping to improve the worsening traffic situation in Jakarta, Sutiyoso—then Governor of Jakarta—bit the bullet and pushed for the construction of the Jakarta Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system in 2001. With worsening traffic congestion and growing population of 8 million in 2000, BRT was thought as the ultimate solution to the traffic woes of people in the capital of Indonesia. The BRT masterplan is projected to have a busway network consisting of eleven corridors. The system is a closed trunk system without a functioning feeder system. The first corridor of Jakarta’s BRT of around 12.9 km, essentially consisting of a dedicated lane and loading platforms for large buses in the inner side of city streets, began operations in early 2004. Initially, the system ran well and showed good results—patrons’ travel time was reduced by an average of 20 minutes through a clean and convenient transport system that had longer operating hours. Pre-launch objections from affected bus operators and the driving public had disappeared. However, problems on the operational and managerial aspects of the project began to crop up a few months after the BRT was launched. Months after the BRT launch, Governor Sutiyoso—then governor of Jakarta—listened intently at the problems presented by the various stakeholders of Jakarta’s Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) System.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Low Carbon Public Transport Carbon Public
    Implementing Low Carbon Public Transport in Jakarta Project RblE&ERenewable Energy & Energy Efficiency Project (REEEP) Project ID 108010494 Report 1 Technical Specification on Cleaner Fuel Buses for Direct Service March 2012 Table of Contents 1. BACKGROUND: DIRECT SERVICE CONCEPT 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Direct Service Concept 1.3 Fleet Type and Capacity 2. DEFINING SUITABLE FLEET FOR DIRECT SERVICE 2.1 Desired Vehicle Performance for Direct Service 222.2 Level of Emissions to be expected 3. FUEL TYPE : DIESEL or CNG? 3.1 The Benefit of Diesel 3.2 The Benefit of CNG 333.3 CbiiCombining the Two: CtiCreating A Sus ta ina ble Sys tem with Differen t Flee t AtArrangement 4. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION DESIGN FOR DIRECT SERVICE BUSES 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Condition of Existing buses 4.3 Chassis and Engine Technical Specification 4.4 Body and Interior Specification and Design 4.5 Equipment and Supporting Tools Specification 5. PROVIDING RELIABILITY IN RUNNING THE DIRECT SERVICE 5.1 The Need for Maintenance Contract: How the Contract Should be Arranged 5.2 Quality Control: How to supervise the Maintenance and Quality Checking 5.3 Monitoring and Evaluation as Part of Quality Control 6. FLEET RECOMMENDATION Implementing Low Carbon Public Transport in Jakarta Project 2 Chapter 1 Background : Direct Service Concept Implementing Low Carbon Public Transport in Jakarta Project 3 CHAPTER 1 1.1 Introduction Transjakarta, the first Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system in REEEP Project “Implementing Low Carbon Public Indonesia, started in 2004. As of February 2012 11 Transport in Jakarta” will outline plans and measures to Corridors, with 180 km long are in operation and served by be taken to implement the tranforming medium buses to 206 stations and 560 buses, 480 of which run on become Transjakarta Direct Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Daftar Perusahaan Angkutan Pariwisata Seluruh Indonesia Per Januari 2018
    DAFTAR PERUSAHAAN ANGKUTAN PARIWISATA SELURUH INDONESIA PER JANUARI 2018 Kode Nama Kota Propinsi Tgl. Mohon No. SK Tgl. SK Berakhir 115001 CV. NA-SABE KOTA LANGSA NANGGROE ACEH 10/11/2007 SK.424/AJ.202/DJPD/115002 15/02/2008 15/02/2013 DARUSSALAM 115002 CV. KURNIA KOTA BANDA ACEH NANGGROE ACEH 16/02/2012 SK.1446/AJ.202/DJPD/115002 30/04/2012 30/04/2017 DARUSSALAM 115003 PT. ANUGERAH LAMPOIH SAKA KOTA BANDA ACEH NANGGROE ACEH 16/02/2012 30/04/2012 30/04/2017 DARUSSALAM 115004 CV. BINTANG SEMPATI KOTA BANDA ACEH NANGGROE ACEH 11/05/2014 SK.3125/AJ.202/DJPD/115004 13/06/2014 13/06/2019 DARUSSALAM 115005 PT. ACEH PHONNA JAYA KOTA BANDA ACEH NANGGROE ACEH 10/07/2017 SK.3374/AJ.202/DJPD/115005 31/07/2017 31/07/2022 DARUSSALAM 125003 PT. PACTO Ltd. KOTA MEDAN SUMATERA UTARA 11/08/2006 AJ.202/3314/LLAJ/125003 28/08/2006 27/08/2011 125005 PT. FOUR SEAS T & T SERVICE KOTA MEDAN SUMATERA UTARA 10/05/2006 AJ.202/2678/LLAJ/125005 20/09/2008 29/11/2010 125006 PT. WORTA HOLIDAYS KOTA MEDAN SUMATERA UTARA 22/06/2011 SK.3662/AJ.202/DJPD/125006 28/10/2011 27/08/2016 125007 PT. KING'S STAR KOTA MEDAN SUMATERA UTARA 20/06/2011 SK.3668/AJ.202/DJPD/125007 28/10/2011 06/11/2015 125008 PT. EVER PROMPT KOTA MEDAN SUMATERA UTARA 23/06/2011 SK.3658/AJ.202/DJPD/125008 28/10/2011 19/11/2016 125009 PT. EKASUKMA WISATA KOTA MEDAN SUMATERA UTARA 17/06/2011 SK.3664/AJ.202/DJPD/125009 28/10/2011 06/11/2015 125010 PT.
    [Show full text]
  • Kota 45 2 Blok M APTB Sinar Jaya Dalam Kota Blok M
    TERMINAL BUS BLOK M Jenis Angkutan Jumlah No. Terminal Perusahaan No. Trayek Jurusan Antar Kota Dalam Kota Kendaraan 1 Blok M damri Dalam Kota Blok M - Kota 45 2 Blok M APTB Sinar Jaya Dalam Kota Blok M - Bogor 7 3 Blok M APTB Mayasari Dalam Kota Blok M - Cileungsi 7 4 Blok M Trans Jabodetabek Dalam Kota Blok M - Ciputat 9 5 Blok M damri Dalam Kota Blok M - Bandara Soeta 14 6 Blok M PPD R. 45 Dalam Kota Blok M - Cililitan 6 7 Blok M Mayasari Bakti R. 57 Dalam Kota Blok M - Puloadung 5 8 Blok M Mayasari Bakti 05 T Dalam Kota Blok M - Bekasi 10 9 Blok M Mayasari Bakti 05 B Dalam Kota Blok M - Bekasi 10 10 Blok M Mayasari Bakti 34 Dalam Kota Blok M - Cimone 10 11 Blok M Mayasari Bakti 121 Dalam Kota Blok M - Cikarang 7 12 Blok M AJA Putra 138 Dalam Kota Blok M - Tangerang 7 13 Blok M metromini S. 69 Dalam Kota Blok M - Ciledug 27 14 Blok M metromini S. 70 Dalam Kota Blok M - joglo 9 15 Blok M metromini S. 71 Dalam Kota Blok M - Bintaro 5 16 Blok M metromini S. 72 Dalam Kota Blok M - Lebak Bulus 9 17 Blok M metromini S. 74 Dalam Kota Blok M - Rempoa 10 18 Blok M metromini S. 75 Dalam Kota Blok M - Ps. Minggu 29 19 Blok M metromini S. 77 Dalam Kota Blok M - Ragunan 4 20 Blok M metromini S. 610 Dalam Kota Blok M - Pondok Labu 26 21 Blok M metromini S.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparisson User's Time Value of Money on Operation of Public
    Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol.9, 2011 Comparison User’s Time Value Of Money On Operation Of Public Transportation System in Jakarta Najid TaufikWijaya Engr, MT, Dr. Engineer Lecturer Graduated Department of Civil Engineering Department of Civil Engineering Tarumanagara University Tarumanagara University Fax: 62-21-5663277 Fax : 62-21-5663277 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Phone: 62-21-5672548 Phone: 62-21-5672548 Mobile: 62818156673 Mobile: 628593383368 Abstract: At the recent time, there is happened move of usage from transit (public transportation) usage to private usage especially motorcycle usage. We have known that level of user satisfaction is relatively depend on the whole situation of trip service variables in the city. The two main attributes that be user’s consideration as the measurement of transit service is travel time and waiting time of transit user. Those time are influenced by the characteristic of the user and the purpose of the user trip. So that is very important to know the time value of both travel time and waiting time of transit user. The time value must depend on various of trip purpose and user characteristic. The stated pereference survey method is applied on the quesionaire to get the data of user preference. Those time value will be differentiate by the trip purpose and the kind of transit (public transportation) service like Bus, Metromini/ Kopaja (Medium Bus) and Mikrolet (Micro Bus). Key Words : Waiting time, travel time, fare, time value 1. BACKGROUND Public transportation or Transit in Jakarta reached 140,000 vehicles and serving 53 routes, which inappropriate vehicle condition or vehicle’ages is more than 12 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Studi Kasus: Kopaja P20)
    ANALISIS POTENSI PERMINTAAN KOPAJA TERINTEGRASI TRANSJAKARTA (STUDI KASUS: KOPAJA P20) Purwhita Nuansa Budi, Alvinsyah Departemen Teknik Sipil, Universitas Indonesia, Kampus Baru UI Depok, 16426, Indonesia E-mail : [email protected] / [email protected] Abstrak Koperasi Angkutan Jakarta (KOPAJA) P20 telah diintegrasi dengan Transjakarta, disebut KOPAJA P20 Terintegrasi. Namun integrasi ini tidak menarik banyak peminat dari penumpang KOPAJA P20 Reguler, dikarenakan sistem pembayaran yang sulit dan waktu tempuh yang tidak memenuhi SPM BRT. KOPAJA merencanakan perbaikan pelayanan dengan penggunaan tiket elektronik dan percepatan waktu tempuh serta akan menambah biaya transportasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan memperkirakan potensi permintaan KOPAJA P20 Terintegrasi. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan model logit berbasiskan persamaan fungsi utilitas yang dikembangkan dengan metode wawancara stated preference ke dalam beberapa skenario selanjutnya dievaluasi dan dipilih fungsi yang terbaik. Hasil analisis menyatakan bila selisih waktu 10 menit dan selisih biaya Rp500, Rp1000 dan Rp1500 potensi permintaan penumpang yang bersedia pindah dari KOPAJA P20 Reguler ke KOPAJA P20 Terintegrasi sebesar 78% (1.769 pnp), 55% (1.247 pnp) dan 29% (658 pnp). Selisih waktu 20 menit dengan selisih biaya yang sama, potensi permintaan penumpang sebesar 90% (2.041 pnp), 74% (1.678 pnp) dan 49% (1.111 pnp). Selisih waktu 30 menit dengan selisih biaya yang sama, potensi permintaan penumpang sebesar 95% (2.155 pnp), 87% (1.973 pnp) dan 70% (1.588 pnp). Mengacu pada hasil analisis peningkatan jumlah potensi permintaan KOPAJA P20 Terintegrasi tergantung dari pelayanan yang diberikan yang meliputi selisih biaya dan selisih waktu. POTENTIAL DEMAND ANALYSIS OF KOPAJA INTEGRATED WITH TRANSJAKARTA (Case Study: KOPAJA P20) Abstract KOPAJA P20 is a medium bus service which is integrated with Transjakarta system.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Entrepreneurs and Collective Violence: Assessing Spatial Variations in Anti-Chinese Rioting Within Jakarta During the May 1998 Riots
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Weeraratne, Suranjan Working Paper Ethnic entrepreneurs and collective violence: Assessing spatial variations in anti-Chinese rioting within Jakarta during the May 1998 riots WIDER Working Paper, No. 2010/55 Provided in Cooperation with: United Nations University (UNU), World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER) Suggested Citation: Weeraratne, Suranjan (2010) : Ethnic entrepreneurs and collective violence: Assessing spatial variations in anti-Chinese rioting within Jakarta during the May 1998 riots, WIDER Working Paper, No. 2010/55, ISBN 978-92-9230-292-4, The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), Helsinki This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/54158 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Document
    Mobility App and Citizens Views from Jakarta Livelihood, Social and Governance Implications of Innovation in Informal Transportation in the Developing World Mobility App and Citizens Ying Gao DRAFT September 2017 Acknowledgements This study is an independent academic research conducted mainly in July-August 2017 (MIT COUHES Protocol #1707014280 “Understanding and Measuring Citizen Perceptions of Informal Public Service Provision in the Case of Urban Transport in Indonesia”). The fieldwork was funded by MIT D-Lab International Development Innovation Network (IDIN, https://d-lab.mit.edu/idin) and MIT Governance Lab (MIT GOV/LAB, www.mitgovlab.org). This document is a research project output submitted to IDIN. I am indebted to wonderful colleagues in Indonesia for their kind support. I would like to express special thanks to fieldwork research assistants Alisa Delmafitri, Balqisa Farhani, Efod Pangkerego, Irena Lucy Ishimora, Joce Timoty Pardosi, Malindo Marpaung, Meidyca Febriandila, Nur Ratna Mukti, and Wahyu Widi Astuti, as well as colleagues at Kemitraan Habitat, MIT Urban Risk Lab PetaBencana Jakarta project office, RuangWaktu – Knowledge Hub for Sustainable (Urban) Development, University of Indonesia Faculty of Law Student Council, University of Indonesia Geography Department, and USAID Jakarta Office. Many others also generously gave help and insights, to which I am grateful. If there are mistakes or inconsistencies of information in this document, they are mine. Contact Information Ying Gao email: [email protected] | Dept. of Political Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) MOBILITY APP AND CITIZENS 2 DRAFT September 2017 Table of Contents List of Acronyms 4 I. Introduction 5 From Innovation to Impact 5 Jakarta: Setting the Scene 6 Research Design: Stakeholder Interviews 8 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Bab I Pendahuluan
    BAB I PENDAHULUAN 1.1 Latar Belakang Pada umumnya perkembangan sarana transportasi di Indonesia berjalan sedikit lebih lambat dibandingkan dengan negara-negara lain seperti Malaysia dan Singapura. Hal ini disebabkan oleh perbedaan regulasi pemerintah masing-masing negara dalam menangani kinerja sistem transportasi yang ada. Kebanyakan dari negara maju menganggap pembangunan transportasi merupakan bagian yang integral dari pembangunan perekonomian. Pembangunan berbagai sarana dan prasarana transportasi seperti halnya dermaga, pelabuhan, bandara, dan jalan rel dapat menimbulkan efek ekonomi berganda (multiplier effect) yang cukup besar, baik dalam hal penyediaan lapangan kerja, maupun dalam memutar konsumsi dan investasi dalam perekonomian lokal dan regional. Banyak peluang bisnis yang muncul dari sektor ini, demikian halnya kesempatan kerja banyak tercipta dari sektor jasa. Saat ini berbagai bisnis jasa banyak di jumpai dalam kehidupan sehari-hari, salah satu contohnya adalah perusahaan jasa transportasi. Bertambahnya jumlah penduduk dan kompleksitas kehidupan yang semakin meningkat, menyebabkan kebutuhan akan jasa transportasi semakin meningkat. Hal ini ditanggapi oleh para pelaku bisnis transportasi untuk berusaha memenuhi kebutuhan tersebut, dengan menambah armadanya maupun mendirikan perusahaan transportasi baru. Banyaknya tempat wisata indah di Bali memicu tingginya jumlah masyarakat dari wilayah jawa khususnya Semarang untuk mengunjungi pulau Bali. Hal ini memberi peluang bagi para pemilik perusahaan transportasi untuk membuat jalur trayek Semarang ke Bali. Ada beberapa perusahaan transportasi yang melayani trayek Semarang ke Bali. Perusahaan jasa tersebut diataranya adalah PO. MAdu Kismo, PO. Safari Darma Raya, PO. Gunung Harta dan PO. Pahala Kencana. Namun tidak semua perusahaan transportasi tersebut mendapat respon positif dari pengguna jasa transportasi. Data penumpang 1-31 Maret 2018 dengan jumlah seat 28-30 sebagi berikut.
    [Show full text]