DOCSLIB.ORG

BEHAVIOR and ACTIVITY of REHABILITATED BUZZARDS &Lpar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BEHAVIOR and ACTIVITY of REHABILITATED BUZZARDS &Lpar J. Raptor Res. 28(2):100-107 ¸ 1994 The Raptor ResearchFoundation, Inc. BEHAVIOR AND ACTIVITY OF REHABILITATED BUZZARDS (Buteo buteo) RELEASED IN NORTHERN ITALY DAVIDE CSERMELY AND CARLO VITTORIO CORONA 1 Dipartimentodi Biologiae FisiologiaGenerali, Universitd di Parma, Viale delle Scienze,1-43100 Parma, Italy AI•STI•CT.--The behaviorand habitat huntingof 16 rehabilitatedcommon buzzards (Buteo buteo) released in northernItaly were analyzed.The buzzardswere releasedindividually in differentseasons, and their activitywas recorded continuously for at leastthe first 3 d after releaseand intermittently thereafter until they dispersedfrom the releasesite. The birds remainedin the surroundingarea for more than 100 d, showinga progressiveacclimation to the new environment.The releasedbuzzards interacted frequently with wild territorialconspecifics and were attackedby severalspecies of corvids,especially the hooded crow (Corvuscorone). Nevertheless, such interactions were not the directcause of dispersal.Some birds defendeda territoryadjacent to or insidethat of a wild buzzard.Prey capture was almost normal, although certainlyunderestimated. Small mammalsand reptileswere mostoften caught. Although the area chosen for this studyhad high human population,this was not a major sourceof interferencewith the releases. Thus,the buzzards appeared to be ableto copewith theirnew environment being minimally influenced by havingbeen in captivity. KEY WORDS: hawks;Buteo buteo; behavior; captivity; dispersal,' rehabilitation; behavioral ecology. Comportamientoy actividad de los Buteobuteo rehabilitados y deyadosen libertaden el nordede Italia RESUMEN.--Seanaliz6 la conductay el habitatde caza de 16 individuosrehabilitados de la especieButeo buteo liberados en el norte de Italia. Los individuos de B. buteo fueron liberados en el firea de estudio individualmenteyen diferentesestaciones; su actividadfue registradacontinuamente por al menostres dias despugsde su liberaci6ne intermitentementehasta el momentode abandonarel sitio de liberaci0n. Las avespermanecieron en los alrededoresdel firea por mils de 100 dias,mostrando una progresiva aclimataci0nal nuevoambiente. Los individuos liberdos interactuaban frecuentemente con conespecificos territorialessilvestres y fueronatacados por variasespecies de c6vidos,especialmente Corvus corone. Sin embargo,tales interacciones no fueronla causadirecta de su dispersion.Algunas aves defendieron territoriosvecinos o al interiorde losdefendidos por individuossilvestres. La capturade presafue casi normal,aunque ciertamente subestimada. Tanto pequefiosmamiferos como reptiles fueron a menudo capturados.Aunque las fireasescogidas para esteestudio tenlan una alta poblaci6nhumana, este factor no constituy6una gran fuente de interferenciassobre las liberaciones. En slntesis,B. buteoparece ser capazde incertarseen sunuevo mediambiente siendo escasamente influenciado por su cautividad. [Traducci6n de Ivan Lazo] Severalprograms for the rehabilitationof raptors still neglected.In fact, it is almostimpossible to get have been developedin recentyears by institutions information of the fate of released birds from the devotedto the protectionof birds. Standard proce- literature, because most data refer to survival rate dures for raptor rehabilitation have been developed and recoverydistance from the releasesite (Servheen for severalspecies (Nelson 1977, Llewellynand Brain and English 1979, Duke et al. 1981, Ingram 1983, 1983, Pendletonet al. 1987, Weaver and Cade 1991) Hamilton et al. 1988). Moreover, little precisein- as well as the techniquesfor successfulrelease (Shet- formation has been compiledon the behaviorof in- rod et al. 1982, Llewellyn 1991). Nevertheless,the dividuals after release. adaptationof birds back into the natural habitat is The objectiveof this study was to fill that gap, investigatingin detail the behavior,activity, and in- tra- and interspecificinteractions in a group of com- • Present address: Via P. Petronia 89, 1-00136 Roma, mon buzzards(Buteo buteo) immediately after re- Italy. lease following rehabilitation until they dispersed 100 JUNE 1994 BEHAVIOROF RELEASEDBUZZARDS 101 from the area. Such an investigationis likely to be The daylight period was equally dividedinto three sec- of interestto raptor rehabilitators(Meyers and Mil- tions that were variable during the year based upon the ler 1992). photoperiod.The proportionof time spentin eachhabitat for each one-third of the daylight period and in every METHODS seasonwas arcsintransformed for comparison.The exact time of sunriseand sunsetfor the geographicalcoordinates The buzzardsused in this study were all wild birds, of the area were calculatedevery 2 wk. The days after housedtemporarily for rehabilitation at the Raptor Re- releasewere countedconsidering the day of releaseas day habilitationCentre (RRC) managedby the Italian Society one. The days of the year were indicatedconsidering the for the Protectionof Birds (LIPU) near Parma. They all spring equinox as day zero. originatedin northernor centralItaly within 100-200 km We usedthe Mann-Whitney U-test to comparemeans, of the release area. When released the birds were all in the Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA (Siegel 1956) to perfect physical condition and flying fitness, and were evaluate time durations between seasons or between thirds chosenrandomly amongthose ready for releasing.Those of the day, the Spearman rank correlationto ascertain possiblyimprinted to humans were not considered. possiblecorrelations, and the Chi-square test to compare A total of 16 buzzards were studied. Six were adult frequencies.The means are given ___SE, and the proba- (two males and four females) and 10 were sub-adults (five bility is always given as two-tailed. malesand five females).They were releasednear the end of each season,from April 1990 to November 1991. Five RESULTS were studied between winter and spring, four between spring and summer, three between summer and autumn, Most buzzardsdid notdisappear quickly from the and four between autumn and winter. Thus, we avoided releasesite in 426.6 hr of observation(Table 1). The the most stressfulclimatic conditionsthat occur in Janu- area used by the birds was about 2730 ha in size, ary-February and in July-August (Kostrzewaand Kos- almost centered around the release site. One-half of trzewa 1991). The duration in captivity was variable, the sampledbuzzards left the studyarea within three ranging from a few days to severalmonths, depending on the seriousnessof the injury or illness.The mean duration days. Three departed within a few hours and one for nine buzzards was 295.5 + 109.2 d. We did not know on day three. This occurredin early spring and the period for the other five, but it was certainly within autumn. the same range. Mortality. Three buzzardsdied in the studyarea The release site was located within a waterfowl sanc- by electrocutionafter perching on medium-tension tuary managedby LIPU about 15 km north of Parma and 5 km from the Po River. The area is flat and without pylonswhich are widely distributedin the plains of extensivewoodlands but with a high human population Italy, and unfortunatelyare a seriousproblem for density. The site was chosenbecause of the necessityto otherspecies too. One bird diedof a gunshotwound observeclosely and track the buzzard behavior precisely, receivedduring the night or at dawn beforewe start- even for long distancesif necessary.Wild buzzards are regularly presentparticularly during winter. Severaltaxa edour observationsession, and anotherdied in spring of invertebratesand terrestrialvertebrates offered an easy for unknownreasons during a late snowfall.Finally, and variable food source. one buzzard was recaptured closeto starvation. The area surroundingthe releasesite containedseveral Habitat Use. Habitat typeswithin the studyarea biotopes,with rather differing vegetalcover. The habitat typeswere evaluatedusing the methoddescribed by Emlen were small. Their distributionwas almostregular, (1956). Several watercourses--the Parma River and sev- andthe buzzardsmoved very easilyfrom onehabitat eral streams--run within the studyarea. Most of the trees to another.We foundgreat individual variability in are concentratedalong them. habitat use (H = 31.79, N = 450, P < 0.001, mea- The buzzardswere releasedindividually between 0900- suredas minutes spentby eachbird in eachhabitat). 1500 H on days without precipitation.Beforehand they were kept on locationin an outdoor aviary for 1-2 wk in Birdsthat changedhabitat frequently had beenkept order for them to habituateto the environment.A radiotag in captivity for the least time (Z = 2.18, N = 279, (9 g two stage,BIOTRACK, Wareham, U.K.) was at- P < 0.05). During winter, buzzardsstayed in one tached some hours before release (Kenward 1987, White habitat longer than in other seasons,both during and Garrott 1990). days 1-3 (H = 10.28, N = 390, P < 0.05) and in The buzzardswere followed virtually continuouslyfrom dawn to dusk each day if weather permitted for the first all-days (H = 17.58, N = 485, P < 0.001). 3 d after release, hereafter referred as "days 1-3." If a The buzzards remained longer in open habitats bird did not leavethe area, it was subsequentlymonitored than in areaswith thick vegetationin every period intermittentlywith the sameschedule at 1-4 d intervals, considered(Kostrzewa 1989). The tendencyto ex- until the bird disappearedfrom the surroundings.That period, including the first 3 d, is hereafter indicated as plore different habitats immediately after release, "all-days."
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reproduction and Behaviour of the Long-Legged Buzzard (.Buteo Rufinus) in North-Eastern Greece
    © Deutschen Ornithologen-Gesellschaft und Partner; download www.do-g.de; www.zobodat.at Die Vogelwarte 39, 1998: 176-182 Reproduction and behaviour of the Long-legged Buzzard (.Buteo rufinus) in North-eastern Greece By Haralambos Alivizatos, Vassilis Goutner and Michael G. Karandinos Abstract: Alivizatos , H., V. Goutner & M. G. Karandinos (1998): Reproduction and behaviour of the Long- legged Buzzard ( Buteo rufinus) in North-eastern Greece. Vogelwarte 39: 176-182. The breeding biology of the Long-legged Buzzard ( Buteo rufinus) was studied in the Evros area, north-eastern Greece in 1989, 1990, 1992 and 1993. The mean number of young fledged per pair per year was similar between years with an overall average of 0.93 (1.58 per successful pair). Of ten home range variables examined, the num­ ber of alternative nest sites and the extent of forest free areas in home ranges were significant predictors of nest­ ling productivity. Aggressive interactions were observed with 18 bird species (of which 12 were raptors), most commonly with the Buzzard {Buteo buteo). Such interactions declined during the course of the season. Prey pro­ visioning to nestlings was greatest in the morning and late in the afternoon declining in the intermediate period. Key words: Buteo rufinus, reproduction, behaviour, Greece. Addresses: Zaliki 4, GR-115 24 Athens, Greece (H. A.); Department of Zoology, Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki, GR-54006, Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece (V. G.); Laboratory of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural University of Athens 75 Iera Odos 1 1855 Athens, Greece (M. G. K.). 1. Introduction The Long-legged Buzzard (Buteo rufinus) is a little known raptor of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Green Plant Material in Bird Nests to Avoid Ectoparasites
    July1984] ShortCommunications 615 the Spot-wingedFalconet may not benefitthe Monk HoY, G. 1980. Notas nidobio16gicasdel noroestear- Parakeet in such a manner. gentino. II. Physis (Buenos Aires), Secc. C, 39 We are grateful to A. G6mez Dur&n and J. C. Vera (96): 63-66. (INTA) for grantingus the useof the fieldwork areas, MACLEAN,G.L. 1973. The SociableWeaver, part 4: to N. Arguello and M. Nores for their assistancein predators, parasites and symbionts. Ostrich 44: the identification of food remains, and to J. Navarro 241-253. for his help in the field. This work wassupported by STRANECK,R., & G. VASINA. 1982. Unusual behav- a grant from the Subsecretariade Ciencia y Tecno- iour of the Spot-winged Falconet (Spiziapteryx logla (SUBCYT) of Argentina. circumcinctus).Raptor Res. 16: 25-26. LITERATURE CITED Received7 July 1983, accepted21 February1984. DEAN, A. 1971. Notes on Spiziapteryxcircumcinctus. Ibis 113: 101-102. The Use of Green Plant Material in Bird Nests to Avoid Ectoparasites PETER H. WIMBERGER 1 ZoologyDivision, Washington State Museum DB-10, Universityof Washington, Seattle,Washington 98105 USA Certain birds characteristicallyplace green plant causesnestling mortality in and nest desertion by material in their nests.This greenery is not part of birds (Webster 1944, Neff 1945, Fitch et al. 1946, Moss the nest structureproper but is placed haphazardly and Camin 1970, Feare 1976,Wheelwright and Boers- around the edges or inside the nest. The birds re- ma 1979).In general,the increasedmortality due to plenishthe spraysof greenmaterial, often daily, dur- ectoparasitesis causedby the loss of blood, which ing incubation and the nestling period (Brown and weakens the host, by viral disease, or by disease Amadon 1968, Beebe1976, pers.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration Strategies of Common Buzzard (Buteo Buteo Linnaeus
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle «Grigore Antipa» Vol. 60 (2) pp. 537–545 DOI: 10.1515/travmu-2017-0008 Research Paper Migration Strategies of Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo Linnaeus, 1758) in Dobruja Cătălin-Răzvan STANCIU1, Răzvan ZAHARIA2, Gabriel-Bogdan CHIȘAMERA4, Ioana COBZARU3, *, Viorel-Dumitru GAVRIL3, 1, Dumitru MURARIU3 1Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, 91–95 Splaiul Independenței, 5050095 Bucharest, Romania 2Oceanographic Research and Marine Environment Protection Society Oceanic-Club, Constanța, Romania 3Institute of Biology Bucharest of Romanian Academy, 296 Splaiul Independenței, 060031 Bucharest, Romania 4“Grigore Antipa” National Museum of Natural History, 1 Kiseleff Blvd., 011341, Bucharest, Romania *corresponding author, email: [email protected] Received: August 2, 2017; Accepted: August 31, 2017; Available online: August 31, 2017; Printed: December 31, 2017 Abstract. We studied various aspects regarding migration behavior of the Common Buzzard for two subspecies (B. b. buteo and B. b. vulpinus) transiting the region which overlaps with the Western Black Sea Corridor. Using vantage points set across Dobruja we managed to count 2,662 individuals. We highlighted the seasonal and diurnal peak passage, flight directions and height of flight for each season. Our results suggest that 57% of the counted individuals belongs to long-distance migrant Steppe Buzzard - B. b. vulpinus. The peek passage period in autumn migration was reached between the 26th of September to the 6th of October, while for the spring migration peek passage remained uncertain. The main autumn passage direction was from N to S, and NNW to SSE but also from NE to SW. For spring passage the main direction was from S to N but also from ESE to WNW.
    [Show full text]
  • Hooded and Carrion Crows to Be Members of the Same Species
    ADVICE The conservation and legal status of the hooded crow in England 1. Background and legal status 1.1 Until 2002, hooded crow and carrion crow were considered to be separate races (sub-species) of the same species Corvus corone. Hooded crow and carrion crow were listed separately in the second schedule of the Protection of Birds Act (1954) which allowed both forms to be killed. Corvus corone (with the common name ‘Crow’) was included in Schedule 2 Part II of the Wildlife & Countryside Act (1981). This listed birds which could be killed or taken by authorised persons at all times and was colloquially referred to as the ‘pest bird’ list. Covus corone and all other species were removed from Schedule 2 Part II in 1993. Corvus corone (‘Crow’) was subsequently included on several general licences when these replaced Schedule 2 Part II as a mechanism for authorising control of named species in certain circumstances and under specified conditions. As sub-species of Corvus corone both hooded crow and carrion crow could be controlled under these licences. 1.2 Following a full review of the latest evidence, the British Ornithologists’ Union (BOU) recommended in 2002 that carrion crow and hooded crow be treated as separate species, Corvus corone and C. cornix respectively (Knox et al. 2002; Parkin et al. 2003). Following this taxonomic recommendation, both species were admitted to the official BOU list of British birds. 1.3 Since 2002, the general licences for England have continued to list Corvus corone (common name ‘Crow’). Due to the taxonomic change this has had the effect of limiting use of the licences to control of the carrion crow, which is the only form of the crow now regarded as Corvus corone.
    [Show full text]
  • WILD BIRDS and the LAW: SCOTLAND a Plain Guide to Bird Protection Red-Necked Phalarope by Guy Shorrock (RSPB)
    For more information about RSPB Scotland, please contact: RSPB Scotland Headquarters, Dunedin House, 25 Ravelston Terrace, Edinburgh EH4 3TP. Tel: 0131 311 6500 E-mail: [email protected] www.rspb.org.uk/scotland The Partnership for Action Against Wildlife Crime (PAW) is a multi-agency body comprising representatives of all the organisations involved in wildlife law enforcement, including the Police, HM Revenue and Customs, representatives of government departments and NGOs, such as the RSPB. It provides a strategic overview of enforcement activity; considers and develops responses to strategic problems; and looks at issues of strategic concern alongside the National Wildlife Crime Unit. RSPB Scotland is part of the RSPB, which speaks out for birds and wildlife, tackling the problems that threaten our environment. Nature is amazing – help us keep it that way. The RSPB is part of BirdLife International, the global partnership of bird conservation organisations. www.rspb.org.uk/birdlaw WILD BIRDS AND THE LAW: SCOTLAND A plain guide to bird protection Red-necked phalarope by Guy Shorrock (RSPB). The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) is a registered charity: England and Wales no. 207076, Scotland no. SC037654. 770-0474-08-09 Wild birds and the law in Scotland This is a summary of the law as it also be possible to get some idea applies to wild birds in Scotland. whether or not an offence has been committed or whether a proposed action We are frequently asked for a handy might be against the law. It is intended guide to the law as it applies to wild to do this without overwhelming the birds in Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do Zoos Attract Crows? a Comparative Study from Europe and Asia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Debrecen Electronic Archive Received: 29 May 2019 | Revised: 10 October 2019 | Accepted: 4 November 2019 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5881 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Why do zoos attract crows? A comparative study from Europe and Asia László Kövér1 | Szabolcs Lengyel2 | Makiko Takenaka3 | Alice Kirchmeir4 | Florian Uhl4 | Rachael Miller4,5 | Christine Schwab4 1Department of Nature Conservation Zoology and Game Management, University Abstract of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary Crows have successfully colonized many cities, and urban zoos have been impor- 2 GINOP Sustainable Ecosystems Group, tant in this process. To evaluate why zoos attract crows, we quantified crow num- Department of Tisza Research, Danube Research Institute, Centre for Ecological bers and behavior in three zoos in Europe (Debrecen, Edinburgh, Vienna) and one in Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Asia (Sapporo). Data were collected in 445 surveys over 297 days in summer 2014 Debrecen, Hungary 3Department of Biology, Tokai University and winter 2014–2015. We found that crow numbers were highest in Vienna, inter- Sapporo Campus, Sapporo, Japan mediate in Debrecen and Edinburgh and lowest in Sapporo, increased significantly 4 Department of Cognitive Biology, from summer to winter (Debrecen, Edinburgh, Vienna), and from mornings to after- University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria noons (Debrecen, Sapporo, Vienna), and were higher in sunny weather than in cloudy 5Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK weather with precipitation and when visitor numbers were low (Debrecen, Vienna). The crows' use of natural food was highest in Vienna, intermediate in Edinburgh and Correspondence László Kövér; Department of Nature Sapporo, and low in Debrecen.
    [Show full text]
  • LEGGED BUZZARD &Lpar
    ]. RaptorRes. 21(1):8-13 ¸ 1987 The Raptor ResearchFoundation, Inc. NOTES ON THE BREEDING BIOLOGY OF THE LONG-LEGGED BUZZARD (Buteorufinus) IN BULGARIA ILIYA Ts. VATEV ABSTRACT.--Observationswere madeon Long-leggedBuzzard (Buteorufinus) nests in Bulgariabetween 1978-83. Egg hatchinginterval was 29-44 hr. First nestlingplumage color was dirty-white tingedbeige, cere and legs yellow; iris color changedfrom sepia at hatchingto brownish yellow-greyat fiedging. Featherswere visibleby two wk. Until two wk old, nestlingsassumed a "frozen" postureon their bellies when alarmed. Nestlingsfed unaided by the fourth wk. Fledging beganby d 49. Adults were aggressive towards humanswhile young were downy, but aggressionlessened as young got older. The Long-leggedBuzzard (Buteorufinus) is one openplains beyond. The area is grazedby sheepand cattle of Europe'sleast studiedraptors. Little detailedin- attendedby herdsmen.The landscapeis variedby scattered thorn scrub,streamside willows (Salix sp.), Carpinusorz- formation on the breeding cycle of the speciesis entalisand a smallconifer plantation (Pinus nigra). Nearest availablein the literature, especiallywith regard to arable groundis one km away. Climate is temperatecon- its nestlings(Dementiev and Gladkov 1954; Brown tinental; av. rainfall = 592.1 liter/m 2 (1981-84); alti- and Amadon 1968; Glutz et al. 1971; Harrison 1975; tude -- 7-800 m. Cramp and Simmons1980). Recently,Michev et al. RESULTS (1984) reported14 definitebreeding records for Bul- The Nest. Long-leggedBuzzards used the same garia and estimatedthe country'spopulation to be nest at Pekliuka in 1981, 1983, and (T. Michev, around 50 pairs. Also reported were noteson nest pers. comm.) 1984. A new nest, relatively slight in sites,egg size, breeding season and foodof the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Presence of Long-Legged Buzzard (Buteo Rufinus) in Moldova (Romania)
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © 28 décembre «Grigore Antipa» Vol. LV (2) pp. 285–290 2012 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-012-0018-6 WINTER PRESENCE OF LONG-LEGGED BUZZARD (BUTEO RUFINUS) IN MOLDOVA (ROMANIA) EMANUEL ȘTEFAN BALTAG, VIOREL POCORA, CONSTANTIN ION, LUCIAN SFÎCĂ Abstract. Long-legged Buzzard (Buteo rufinus) is a medium sized bird of prey which is known as a breeding species for Romania. In the last years it started to become a common wintering presence in the south-eastern part of Romania (Dobrogea) but it was also recorded in the more northern areas (Moldova) during the cold season. Its presence in Moldova, during the winter period, was recorded in large river valleys, with agricultural lands or grasslands and with trees or timber poles, which are used for perching. Long-legged Buzzard is a new presence for Moldavian winter seasons and it could be observed only in warm periods of winter, when the daily mean temperature is above 0°C. The wintering places are maintained not only for all winter period, but also for the next years. This behaviour could be explained by its territorial fidelity, which was recorded also in other European buzzard species during the winter period. Résumé. Buse féroce (Buteo rufinus) est un oiseau de taille moyenne de proie qui est connu comme une espèce nicheuse pour la Roumanie. Dans les dernières années, il est devenu une présence commune au cours de l’hiver au sud-est de la Roumanie (Dobroudja), mais il était également enregistré dans les régions du Nord (Moldavie) pendant la saison froide.
    [Show full text]
  • SOCIAL Organizanon in a Populanon of the HOODED CROW JON LOMAN Data Presented in This Paper Will Be Used for Two Kinds of Compar
    SOCIAL ORGANIZAnON IN A POPULAnON OF THE HOODED CROW JON LOMAN Dept. of Animal Ecology, Ecology building, S 223 62 Lund, Sweden Received 16 February 1982, revised 8 May 1984 CONTENTS cally related, species. Corvid social organization 1. Introduction.................................................... 61 can roughly be classified as territorial, colonial, 2. Study area....................................................... 61 or communal. Territorial systems are those 3. Methods......................................................... 62 3.1. Trapping and tagging................................... 62 where the living space is split up into exclusive 3.2. Recording................................................. 62 territories, at least during the breeding season. 3.3. Radio-tracking........................................... 62 Colonial species have their nests concentrated 4. Results........................................................... 62 and feed in a common area around the nesting 4.1. Territorial and flock crows in spring................ 62 4.2. Acquisition of territories and pair bond............ 64 colony but each nest is tended by a single pair. 4.3. Attachment to the territory........... 65 Communal societies are those where a family 4.4. Seasonal variation in flock size and feeding group tends one nest in a shared territory. The stations 66 4.5. Distribution of crows during winter.. 68 Hooded Crow mainly belongs to the territorial 4.6. Migration................................................. 70 category. Abshagen (1963)
    [Show full text]
  • FACED BUZZARD &Lpar;<I>BUTASTUR INDICUS</I>
    j. RaptorRes. 38(3):263-269 ¸ 2004 The Raptor ResearchFoundation, Inc. BREEDING BIOLOGY OF THE GREY-FACED BUZZARD (BUTASTUR INDICUS) IN NORTHEASTERN CHINA WEN-HONG DENG 1 MOE KeyLaboratory for BiodiversityScience and Ecological En•neering, College of Life Sciences, BeijingNormal University, Beijing, 100875 China WEI GAO Collegeof Life Sciences,Northeast Normal University, Changchun, 130024 China JI•NG ZHAO Collegeof Life Sciences,illin NormalUniversity, Siping, 136000 China ABSTRACT.--Westudied the breeding biologyof the Grey-facedBuzzard (Butasturindicus) in Zuojia Nature Reserve,Jinlin province,China from 1996-98. Grey-facedBuzzards are summerresidents in northeasternChina. Nesting sites were occupied in Marchand annualreoccupancy was 60%. Grey-faced Buzzardsbuilt new or repairedold nestsin late March and laid eggsin earlyApril. Layingpeaked in late April and spanned32 d (N = 15 clutches).Clutches consisted of 3-4 eggs,incubated for 33 -+ 1 d predominantlyby the female,to whomthe malebrought prey. After young hatched, the femalealso beganhunting. The mean brood-rearingperiod was 38 -+ 2 d and nestlingfemales attained larger asymptoticmass than males,but the lattergrew fasten Males fledged at a meanage of 35 d and females at 39 d. Youngwere slightlyheavier than adultsat fiedging,but the wing chordand tail lengthswere shorterthan thoseof adults.A total of 50 eggswas laid in 15 nests(i clutchsize = 3.3), of which80% hatchedand 90% of the nestlingsfledged. A mean of 2.4 youngfledged per breedingattempt. Overall nest successwas 80%. Causesof nest failure were addled eggsand predation on eggsor nestlingsby small mammals (e.g., Siberian weasel [Mustelasibe•ica] ). KEYWORDS: Grey-facedBuzzard; Butastur indicus; breeding biology; clutch size,, nestlings; fledglings; develop- m•t;, reproductivesuccess. BIOLOG•A REPRODUCTIVA DE BUTASTUR INDICUS EN EL NORESTE DE CHINA REsUMEN.--Estudiamosla biologla reproductiva de Butasturindicus en la reservaNatural de la Provi- denciade Jinlin en Chinadesde 1996-98.
    [Show full text]
  • Buzzard (Common Buzzard), with Its Catholic Diet and Habitat Preferences, and a General Decline in Persecution, Now Breeds in Almost Everybuzzard Part of Britain
    Buteo buteo 1. INTRODUCTION The buzzard (common buzzard), with its catholic diet and habitat preferences, and a general decline in persecution, now breeds in almost everyBuzzard part of Britain. Substantial increases in the population have occurred during the last two decades (Clements, 2000; Holling, 2007). Breeding numbers and range have also increased in Ireland (Norriss, 1991; Greenwood et al., 2003). Adult buzzards are largely sedentary in Britain and Ireland, in contrast to the majority of European populations that are migratory. Most immature buzzards undertake dispersive movements from their first September until they settle at around two years of age (Walls & Kenward, 1998). Fennoscandian buzzards are migratory and a few may reach eastern Britain. Adults of both sexes are similar, although males may be identified from their smaller size when seen close to females. Before their first moult at one year old, juveniles can be separated from adults. Adults have dark brown eyes and a broad, dark sub-terminal tail band; juveniles have lighter eyes and faint, narrow tail bars with no broad sub-terminal band. Juveniles also have distinct teardrop streaking to the feathers on the underparts, often showing a lot of the whitish background feathers. Adults are never streaked but have barring on many of the breast and belly feathers, sometimes very heavy so that little if any white shows. Adults also clearly show the classic pale crescent across the breast usually absent in juveniles. For further information on the biology and ecology of this
    [Show full text]
  • A Resume of Anting, with Particular Reference to A
    A RESUMI? OF ANTING, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO A CAPTIVE ORCHARD ORIOLE BY LOVIE M. WHITAKER INCE Audubon (1831:7) wrote of Wild Turkeys (Meleugris gallopuvo) S rolling in “deserted” ants ’ nests (Allen, 1946)) and Gosse (1847:225) reported Tinkling Grackles (Q uiscalus niger) in nature anointing themselves with lime fruits (Chisholm, 1944), an extensive literature on the anting ac- tivities of birds has slowly evolved. The complete bibliography of anting probably would approximate 250 items, yet the purpose of the behavior re- mains unexplained. Anting may be defined as the application of foreign substances to the plum- age and possibly to the skin. These substances may be applied with the bill, or the bird may “bathe” or posture among thronging ants which invest its plumage. Among numerous explanations for the use of ants are these: (1) the bird wipes off ant acid, preparatory to eating the ant; (2) ants prey upon, and their acids repel, ectoparasites; (3) ant acids have tonic or medicinal effects on the skin of birds; (4) odor of ants attracts birds, much as dogs are drawn to ordure or cats to catnip; (5) an t s intoxicate the bird or give it unique pleasurable effects; (6) ant substances on the plumage, irradiated by sun- light, produce vitamin D, which the bird ingests during preening; (7) the bird enjoys the movement of insects in its plumage; (8) ant substances pre- vent over-drying of feather oils or give a proper surface film condition to the feathers. For discussions of these possibilities, see Chisholm (1944, 1948: 163-175)) Adlersparre (1936)) IJ zen d oorn (1952~)) Eichler (1936~)) Klein- Schmidt (in Stresemann, 1935b), L ane (1951:163-177)) Kelso (1946, 1949, 1950a, 19506, 1955 :37-39)) Brackbill (1948)) G6roudet (1948), Groskin (1950)) and McAtee (1938).
    [Show full text]