DOCSLIB.ORG

Nest-Site Selection by Four Sympatric Forest Raptors in Southern Norway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nest-Site Selection by Four Sympatric Forest Raptors in Southern Norway J. RaptorRes. 31(1):16-25 ¸ 1997 The Raptor ResearchFoundation, Inc. NEST-SITE SELECTION BY FOUR SYMPATRIC FOREST RAPTORS IN SOUTHERN NORWAY VmAa SELAS Departmentof Biologyand Nature Conservation,Agricultural University of Norway, P.O.Box 5014, N-1432 Ks, Norway ABsTR•CT.--Differencesbetween 0.1 ha nest-siteplots of Honey Buzzards (Pernisapivorus), European Sparrowhawks(Acdpiter nisus), Northern Goshawks(A. gentilis)and Common Buzzards (Buteobuteo) were comparedto randomlysampled 0.1 ha control plotswithin a 400 km2 area with 80% forestand <2% agriculturalland in southernNorway. At Honey Buzzardnest sites,forests were more productive than in control plots and there wasa higher proportion of spruce,older trees and a higher tree density at Northern Goshawknest sitesthan in control plots. Nests of European Sparrowhawkswere also in siteswith higher tree densitythan expected.Common Buzzardnest siteswere situatedin steeperterrain than control plots and more often had a southern aspect.For sparrowhawks,nesting in forestswith high tree densitymay be an adaptation to avoid goshawksand pine martens (Martesmartes) which are their main nest predators. For the larger species,nest-site selection may be a responseboth to nest predation risk, microclimate,foraging habitat and food supply. KEYWORDS: HoneyBuzzard; European Sparrowhawk; Common Buzzard; Northern Goshawk; Accipiter nisus; Accipiter gentilis;Buteo buteo; Pernis apivorus;forest;, nest-site selection; Norway. Seleccitn del nido de cuatro rapacesde bosquesin que no aparean en el sur de Norway. RESUMEN.---Diferenciasentre 0.1 ha parcela de sitio de nido de Pernisapivorus, Acdpter nisus, A. gentilis y Buteobuteo fueron comparadoscon muestrasalazar 0.1 ha parcelasmanejadas dentro de una area de 400 km2 con 80% bosquey <2% tierra agricolaen el sur de Norway.En nidos de Pernisapivorus, los bosquesfueron mas productivo en las parcelasmanejadas y habia una proporcitn alta de Picea,firboles maduros y densidad alto de firboles en nidos de A. nisustambi•n estaban en sitios con densidad alta de firbolesmas de 1oque esperfibamos.Nidos de B. buteoestaban situados mas en terreno abrupto que en parcelasmanejadas y con frecuencia tenla aspectodel sur. Para A. nisus, nidos en el bosque con densidad alta de firboles puede ser un adaptacitn para evitar A. gentilisy Martes martesque son su principal depredador de nido. Para la especiemas grande, la seleccitn del nido puede ser reaccitn a riesgode depredador al nido, microclima,hfibitat de forraje y suministrode cornida. [Traduccitn de Rafil De La Garza, Jr.] Breeding pairs of raptors use relatively large ar- hand, dense foliage may decreasethe possibilityfor eas, and thus have a good opportunity to select breeding birds to detect and escape from preda- nesting placesthat maximize the probability of suc- tots (G6tmark et al. 1995). Thus, selection of nest cessfulbreeding and lifetime reproduction (New- site may be a trade-off between concealment and ton 1979). Interspecificdifferences in nest-sitese- opportunities to escapeor attack predators, which lection may be due to differences in body size and also depend on flight ability, body size or other flight performance of different species,but it can characteristicsof the species.Selection may alsobe also be due to interspecificdifferences in nest pre- affected by a trade-off between current and future dation risk, climatic conditions during breeding reproduction, since short-lived specieswith large and feeding habits (Newton 1979,Janes 1985), or brood sizes have more to lose when nesting at- to interspecificcompetition for nest sitesand ter- tempts fail than long-lived species with smaller ritories (Newton 1979). brood sizes. For several bird species,dense foliage close to Cover may also be an important factor since it the nest both reduces the rate of detection, and can shield nests from wind or rain and limit ex- impedes the ability of predators to hunt in the vi- cessive nocturnal radiation loss or excessive diur- cinity of the nest (Martin 1993). On the other nal heat-gain from solar radiation (Walsberg1985). 16 M_•CH 1997 NEST-SITE SELECTION BY FOUR RA_PTORS 17 Protection from thermal extremesmay be the most 400 km •and is situated 50-300 m a.s.l. and 10-30 km important factor in nest-siteselection by medium- inland from the coast, in the boreo-nemoral zone (Abra- hamsen et al. 1977). The climate is suboceanic,and snow and large-sizedraptors where nest predation is low usually covers the ground from December-April. The (Newton 1979,Janes 1985). At higher latitudes,the studyarea is hilly and sharplyundulating. It is dominated timing of breeding in these birds should be im- by forests(80%), with scatteredlakes (10%), bogs (5%) portant, since early breeders are faced with more and lessthan 2% agriculturalland. Forestsare character- ized by a fine-grained mosaicof young-, medium- and severeclimatic conditionsthan thosespecies which old-aged coniferous, mixed and deciduous stands,with begin nesting later in spring. Scotspine (Pinussylvestris), Norway spruce (Piceaatnes), If prey are not evenlydispersed throughout the oak (Quercusspp.), aspen (Populustremula) and birch landscape,raptors should selectnest sitesclosest to (Betulaspp.) the dominant tree species. the best hunting areasin order to reduce time and Forestrybased on clear cutting, replanting and thin- ning of the regrowth was introduced to the area in the energy connectedwith foraging. Thus, local varia- 1950s.At the time of my study,approximately 30% of the tion in the availabilityof food may influence the area had been clear-cut,with most regeneration<20 yr. nest-siteselection (Janes1985), and explain inter- The area is dividedinto numeroussmall ownerships with specific differences in nesting habitat. management of forests controlled by each of the land owners.Most of the properties are managed to provide In Fennoscandia,four raptor specieshunt and a mosaicof forest types.Thus, there is a heterogeneous nest in forest-dominatedlandscapes. The Europe- environmenton a small scale,but a homogeneous,frag- an Sparrowhawk (Accipiternisus; mean body mass mented environmenton a large scale. male 150 g, female 260 g) is the main predator on The study area was searchedfor nest sites each year small birds (Sulkava 1964a, Selfis 1993), while the (cf. Forsman and Solonen 1984), and habitat variables were describedat one nest site in each nestingterritory Northern Goshawk (A. gentilis;mean body mass located. If possible,the nest site used in 1988 was select- male 870 g, female 1330 g) primarilyfeeds upon ed. In territories where the 1988 nest was not found, I larger bird speciesand mammals (H6glund 1964, usuallydescribed the nest site usedin 1989. Alternatively, Sulkava 1964b, Widan 1987, Selfis 1989). The Com- the nest site used closest in time to 1988 or 1989 was described.The breeding densityof goshawksincreased mon Buzzard (Buteobuteo; mean body massmale during the time of the study.To get a larger number of 740 g, female 1100 g) is a generalistpredator that nest sitesof this species,I first selectedone nest site from respondsfunctionally to changesin populationsof each of the nesting territories used since 1985. Then, I its vole (Microtusspp.) prey (Suomus1952, Spidso selectedone nest site in each of the 11 new nesting ter- ritories establishedduring 1986-88, even though these and Sel•s 1988), while the Honey Buzzard (Pernis territories substitutedfive of the existingones. Since the apivorus;mean body massmale 750 g, female 910 goshawksin the five old territories had all been illegally g) mainly feeds on the larvae and pupae of social shot by game keepers, I regarded the data to be inde- hymenoptera species(Holstein 1944, Hagen and pendent. Thus, I describeda total of 48 nest site plots of Bakke 1958, It/imies and Mikkola 1972). the sparrowhawk,30 of the goshawk,50 of the Common Buzzard,and 21 of the Honey Buzzard. Severalauthors have describednest sitesused by Control plotswere describedduring 1989. Aerial pho- sparrowhawks (Tinbergen 1946, Holstein 1950, tographsof the studyarea taken in spring 1989 (scale1: Hald-Mortensen1974), goshawks(Holstein 1942, 15000) were covered by a grid with 100 numbered inter- Dietzen 1978, Link 1986), Common Buzzards sectionsof which two were randomly selectedas control plots. Out of 122 selectedpoints, 80 (65.6%) were locat- (Holstein 1956, Kntwer and Loske 1980, Solonen ed in forests>20 yr old and 25 (20.5%) were in forests 1982, Jedrzejewskiet al. 1988, Hubert 1993) and <20 yr old (clear-cutsand regrowth), while 9 (7.4%) Honey Buzzards (Holstein 1944, Arecoif et al. were on lakes,4 (3.3%) on bogs,and 4 (3.3%) on agri- 1994) in Europe. However, no one has compared cultural land or developed areas. Measurements were made only in control plotsin habitatsapparently suitable nest-siteselection of sympatricpopulations of these for raptors (i.e., forests >20 yr old, N = 80). speciesin a continuousforest habitat. My aim was Each of the nest site plots and the control plots cov- to study the importance of different habitat vari- ered 0.1 ha within a circle with a radius of 17.8 m. In ableson nest-siteselection of thesespecies by com- nest site plots, the nest was in the center of the circle. paring habitat variablesfrom plots at nest siteswith The followinghabitat variableswere used: those from plots placed randomly in the study 1) Site type, determined from the plant community area. (Kielland-Lund 1981, 1994). Plots dominated by Bar- bilophozio-Pinetumor Vaccinio-Pinetumwere classifiedas STUDY AREA AND METHODS siteswith
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE LONG-EARED OWL INSIDE by CHRIS NERI and NOVA MACKENTLEY News from the Board and Staff
    WINTER 2014 TAKING FLIGHT NEWSLETTER OF HAWK RIDGE BIRD OBSERVATORY The elusive Long-eared Owl Photo by Chris Neri THE LONG-EARED OWL INSIDE by CHRIS NERI and NOVA MACKENTLEY News from the Board and Staff..... 2 For many birders thoughts of Long-eared Owls invoke memories of winter Education Updates .................. 4 visits to pine stands in search of this often elusive species. It really is magical Research Features................... 6 to enter a pine stand, find whitewash and pellets at the base of trees and realize that Long-eareds are using the area that you are searching. You scan Stewardship Notes ................. 12 up the trees examining any dark spot, usually finding it’s just a tangle of Volunteer Voices.................... 13 branches or a cluster of pine needles, until suddenly your gaze is met by a Hawk Ridge Membership........... 14 pair of yellow eyes staring back at you from a body cryptically colored and Snore Outdoors for HRBO ......... 15 stretched long and thin. This is often a birders first experience with Long- eared Owls. However, if you are one of those that have journeyed to Hawk Ridge at night for one of their evening owl programs, perhaps you were fortunate enough to see one of these beautiful owls up close. CONTINUED ON PAGE 3 HAWK RIDGE BIRD OBSERVATORY 1 NOTES FROM THE DIRECTOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS by JANELLE LONG, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR As I look back to all of the accomplishments of this organization, I can’t help but feel proud CHAIR for Hawk Ridge Bird Observatory and to be a part of it.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproduction and Behaviour of the Long-Legged Buzzard (.Buteo Rufinus) in North-Eastern Greece
    © Deutschen Ornithologen-Gesellschaft und Partner; download www.do-g.de; www.zobodat.at Die Vogelwarte 39, 1998: 176-182 Reproduction and behaviour of the Long-legged Buzzard (.Buteo rufinus) in North-eastern Greece By Haralambos Alivizatos, Vassilis Goutner and Michael G. Karandinos Abstract: Alivizatos , H., V. Goutner & M. G. Karandinos (1998): Reproduction and behaviour of the Long- legged Buzzard ( Buteo rufinus) in North-eastern Greece. Vogelwarte 39: 176-182. The breeding biology of the Long-legged Buzzard ( Buteo rufinus) was studied in the Evros area, north-eastern Greece in 1989, 1990, 1992 and 1993. The mean number of young fledged per pair per year was similar between years with an overall average of 0.93 (1.58 per successful pair). Of ten home range variables examined, the num­ ber of alternative nest sites and the extent of forest free areas in home ranges were significant predictors of nest­ ling productivity. Aggressive interactions were observed with 18 bird species (of which 12 were raptors), most commonly with the Buzzard {Buteo buteo). Such interactions declined during the course of the season. Prey pro­ visioning to nestlings was greatest in the morning and late in the afternoon declining in the intermediate period. Key words: Buteo rufinus, reproduction, behaviour, Greece. Addresses: Zaliki 4, GR-115 24 Athens, Greece (H. A.); Department of Zoology, Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki, GR-54006, Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece (V. G.); Laboratory of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural University of Athens 75 Iera Odos 1 1855 Athens, Greece (M. G. K.). 1. Introduction The Long-legged Buzzard (Buteo rufinus) is a little known raptor of Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Accipiters.Pdf
    Accipiters The northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) and the sharp-shinned hawk (Accipiter striatus) are the Alaskan representatives of a group of hawks known as accipiters, with short, rounded wings (short in comparison with other hawks) and long tails. The third North American accipiter, the Cooper’s hawk (Accipiter cooperii) is not found in Alaska. Both native species are abundant in the state but not commonly seen, for they spend the majority of their time in wooded habitats. When they do venture out into the open, the accipiters can be recognized easily by their “several flaps and a glide” style of flight. General Description: Adult northern goshawks are bluish- gray on the back, wings, and tail, and pearly gray on the breast and underparts. The dark gray cap is accented by a light gray stripe above the red eye. Like most birds of prey, female goshawks are larger than males. A typical female is 25 inches (65 cm) long, has a wingspread of 45 inches (115 cm) and weighs 2¼ pounds (1020 g) while the average male is 19½ inches (50 cm) in length with a wingspread of 39 inches (100 cm) and weighs 2 pounds (880 g). Adult sharp-shinned hawks have gray backs, wings and tails (males tend to be bluish-gray, while females are browner) with white underparts barred heavily with brownish-orange. They also have red eyes but, unlike goshawks, have no eyestrip. A typical female weighs 6 ounces (170 g), is 13½ inches (35 cm) long with a wingspread of 25 inches (65 cm), while the average male weighs 3½ ounces (100 g), is 10 inches (25 cm) long and has a wingspread of 21 inches (55 cm).
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Green Plant Material in Bird Nests to Avoid Ectoparasites
    July1984] ShortCommunications 615 the Spot-wingedFalconet may not benefitthe Monk HoY, G. 1980. Notas nidobio16gicasdel noroestear- Parakeet in such a manner. gentino. II. Physis (Buenos Aires), Secc. C, 39 We are grateful to A. G6mez Dur&n and J. C. Vera (96): 63-66. (INTA) for grantingus the useof the fieldwork areas, MACLEAN,G.L. 1973. The SociableWeaver, part 4: to N. Arguello and M. Nores for their assistancein predators, parasites and symbionts. Ostrich 44: the identification of food remains, and to J. Navarro 241-253. for his help in the field. This work wassupported by STRANECK,R., & G. VASINA. 1982. Unusual behav- a grant from the Subsecretariade Ciencia y Tecno- iour of the Spot-winged Falconet (Spiziapteryx logla (SUBCYT) of Argentina. circumcinctus).Raptor Res. 16: 25-26. LITERATURE CITED Received7 July 1983, accepted21 February1984. DEAN, A. 1971. Notes on Spiziapteryxcircumcinctus. Ibis 113: 101-102. The Use of Green Plant Material in Bird Nests to Avoid Ectoparasites PETER H. WIMBERGER 1 ZoologyDivision, Washington State Museum DB-10, Universityof Washington, Seattle,Washington 98105 USA Certain birds characteristicallyplace green plant causesnestling mortality in and nest desertion by material in their nests.This greenery is not part of birds (Webster 1944, Neff 1945, Fitch et al. 1946, Moss the nest structureproper but is placed haphazardly and Camin 1970, Feare 1976,Wheelwright and Boers- around the edges or inside the nest. The birds re- ma 1979).In general,the increasedmortality due to plenishthe spraysof greenmaterial, often daily, dur- ectoparasitesis causedby the loss of blood, which ing incubation and the nestling period (Brown and weakens the host, by viral disease, or by disease Amadon 1968, Beebe1976, pers.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised January 19, 2018 Updated June 19, 2018
    BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION / BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC WILDLIFE YUBA PROJECT YUBA RIVER RANGER DISTRICT TAHOE NATIONAL FOREST REVISED JANUARY 19, 2018 UPDATED JUNE 19, 2018 PREPARED BY: MARILYN TIERNEY DISTRICT WILDLIFE BIOLOGIST 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 3 II. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... 4 III. CONSULTATION TO DATE ...................................................................................................... 4 IV. CURRENT MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ............................................................................... 5 V. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AND ALTERNATIVES ......................... 6 VI. EXISTING ENVIRONMENT, EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES, AND DETERMINATION ......................................................................... 41 SPECIES-SPECIFIC ANALYSIS AND DETERMINATION ........................................................... 54 TERRESTRIAL SPECIES ........................................................................................................................ 55 WESTERN BUMBLE BEE ............................................................................................................. 55 BALD EAGLE ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Immature Northern Goshawk Captures, Kills, and Feeds on Adult&Hyphen
    DECEMUER2003 SHO•tT COMMUNICATIONS 337 [EDs.], Proceedingsof the 4th Workshop of Bearded Vulture (Gypaetusbarbatus) in the Pyrenees:influence Vulture. Natural History Museum of Crete and Uni- on breeding success.Bird Study46:224-229. versity of Crete, Iraklio, Greece. --AND --. 2002. Pla de recuperaci6 del trenca- --AND M. RAZIN.1999. Ecologyand conservationof 16s a Catalunya: biologia i conservaci6. Documents the Bearded Vultures: the case of the Spanish and dels Quaderns de Medi Ambient, 7. Generalitat de French Pyrenees.Pages 29-45 in M. Mylonas [ED.], Catalunya, Departament de Medi Ambient, Barcelo- Proceedingsof the Bearded Vulture Workshop. Nat- na, Spain. ural History Museum of Crete and University of , ---,J. BERTP,AN, ANt) R. HERrre^. 2003. Breed- Crete, Iraklio, Greece. ing biology and successof the Bearded Vulture HIRALDO,F., M. DELIBES,ANDJ. CALDER(SN. 1979. E1 Que- (Gypaetusbarbatus) in the eastern Pyrenees.Ibis 145 brantahuesos(Gypaetus barbatus). L. Monografias 22. 244-252. ICONA, Madrid, Spain. , --, AND R. HE•Em^. 1997. Estimaci6n de la MARGAiJDA,A. ANDJ. BERTRAN.2000a. Nest-buildingbe- disponibilidad tr6fica para el Quebrantahuesosen Ca- haviour of the Bearded Vulture (Gypaetusbarbatus). talufia (NE Espafia) e implicacionessobre su conser- Ardea 88:259-264. vaci6n. Do•ana, Acta Vertetm24:227-235. --AND --. 2000b. Breeding behaviour of the NEWTON,I. 1979. Populationecology ofraptors. T. &A D Bearded Vulture (Gypaetusbarbatus): minimal sexual Poyser,Berkhamsted, UK. differencesin parental activities.Ibis 142:225-234. ß 1986. The Sparrowhawk.T. & A.D. Poyser,Cal- --AND --. 2001. Function and temporal varia- ton, UK. tion in the use of ossuaries by Bearded Vultures --^NO M. MA•QUtSS.1982. Fidelity to breeding area (Gypaetusbarbatus) during the nestling period.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration Strategies of Common Buzzard (Buteo Buteo Linnaeus
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle «Grigore Antipa» Vol. 60 (2) pp. 537–545 DOI: 10.1515/travmu-2017-0008 Research Paper Migration Strategies of Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo Linnaeus, 1758) in Dobruja Cătălin-Răzvan STANCIU1, Răzvan ZAHARIA2, Gabriel-Bogdan CHIȘAMERA4, Ioana COBZARU3, *, Viorel-Dumitru GAVRIL3, 1, Dumitru MURARIU3 1Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, 91–95 Splaiul Independenței, 5050095 Bucharest, Romania 2Oceanographic Research and Marine Environment Protection Society Oceanic-Club, Constanța, Romania 3Institute of Biology Bucharest of Romanian Academy, 296 Splaiul Independenței, 060031 Bucharest, Romania 4“Grigore Antipa” National Museum of Natural History, 1 Kiseleff Blvd., 011341, Bucharest, Romania *corresponding author, email: [email protected] Received: August 2, 2017; Accepted: August 31, 2017; Available online: August 31, 2017; Printed: December 31, 2017 Abstract. We studied various aspects regarding migration behavior of the Common Buzzard for two subspecies (B. b. buteo and B. b. vulpinus) transiting the region which overlaps with the Western Black Sea Corridor. Using vantage points set across Dobruja we managed to count 2,662 individuals. We highlighted the seasonal and diurnal peak passage, flight directions and height of flight for each season. Our results suggest that 57% of the counted individuals belongs to long-distance migrant Steppe Buzzard - B. b. vulpinus. The peek passage period in autumn migration was reached between the 26th of September to the 6th of October, while for the spring migration peek passage remained uncertain. The main autumn passage direction was from N to S, and NNW to SSE but also from NE to SW. For spring passage the main direction was from S to N but also from ESE to WNW.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Northern Goshawk Forest Type Preference in the Chippewa
    Northern Goshawk Forest Type Preference in the Chippewa National Forest Travis W. Ludwig Department of Resource Analysis, Saint Mary’s University of MN, Winona, MN 55987 Keywords: Goshawk, Accipiter gentilis, GIS, forest stands, Chippewa National Forest, minimal convex polygons, quaking aspen Abstract The Chippewa National Forest has large expanses of land that are densely forested and largely uninhabited providing excellent habitat for Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentiles). The Chippewa National Forest is currently updating its forest management plan and one of the issues is the importance of goshawk habitat. The goshawk is a listed Sensitive Species in the Eastern Region for the U.S. Forest Service. This study used a geographic information system to assess which forest types are important as goshawk habitat. Since limited knowledge exists concerning goshawk habitat, three habitat estimations (minimal convex polygons, Kernel 95% and Forage Buffer) were used to determine which forest stands occur within goshawk utilization areas. While quaking aspen plays a vital role in goshawk habitat in the Chippewa National Forest, goshawks there are opportunistic and take advantage of many other forest types. Introduction The Chippewa National Forest, hereafter called Chippewa NF, encompasses 1.6 million acres. Of this, 666,325 acres are managed by the USDA Forest Service. The forest consists of aspen, birch, pine, balsam fir, and maple species. The Chippewa NF contains approximately 1300 lakes, 900 miles of rivers and streams, and 400,000 acres of wetlands. The Chippewa NF is the largest national forest east of the Mississippi (Chippewa National Forest Website, 2002). The Chippewa NF is located in northern Minnesota between the cities of Grand Rapids to the east and Bemidji to the west (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Goshawk (Accipiter Gentiles)
    Northern Goshawk (Accipiter gentiles) Paul Cotter The northern goshawk (goshawk) is a short-winged, highly maneuverable hawk of the accipiter group inhabiting boreal and mountain forests of North American, Europe, and northern Russia. Some goshawks migrate; some are resident; and others are probably nomadic, moving more in years of low prey. The breeding and winter ranges of the goshawk overlap extensively. In Southeastern Alaska (Southeast), the goshawk is a year-round resident and begins to occupy nesting stands in February and March (Iverson et al. 1996) (Fig 1). Relatively large size, a slate gray back, and a fine gray barring on underparts make the adult goshawk difficult to confuse with any other bird of prey in the Tongass National Forest. Under poor light and in the forest, however, the FIG 1. Male northern goshawk at nest in old-growth forest in southeastern Alaska. (Bob Armstrong) goshawk and red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) can be confused, even by experienced birders. Short wings multiyear study to examine the ecology and habitat and a long tail make the goshawk well-suited for associations of Queen Charlotte goshawks in the navigating through its most common habitat of old- Tongass National Forest. growth forest, where it often crashes through dense brush to capture birds and small mammals. In STATUS IN SOUTHEASTERN ALASKA Southeast, the primary diet of the goshawk includes Distribution grouse, ptarmigan, red squirrels (Tamiasciurus The goshawk is found across the Tongass National hudsonicus), songbirds, jays, and crows (Lewis 2001). Forest from Dixon Entrance in southern Southeast In the mid-1990s, the conservation status of the (Iverson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Goshawk Laingi Subspecies
    COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Northern Goshawk Laingi subspecies Accipiter gentilis laingi in Canada THREATENED 2000 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION DES ENDANGERED WILDLIFE ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: Please note: Persons wishing to cite data in the report should refer to the report (and cite the author(s)); persons wishing to cite the COSEWIC status will refer to the assessment (and cite COSEWIC). A production note will be provided if additional information on the status report history is required. COSEWIC 2000. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Northern Goshawk Laingi subspecies Accipiter gentilis laingi in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 36 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm) Cooper, J.M. and P.A. Chytyk. 2000. Update COSEWIC status report on the Northern Goshawk Laingi subspecies Accipiter gentilis laingi in Canada, in COSEWIC assessment and update status status report on the Northern Goshawk Laingi subspecies Accipiter gentilis laingi in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-36 pp. Previous Report Duncan P. and D.A. Kirk. 1995. COSEWIC status report on the Queen Charlotte Goshawk Accipiter gentilis laingi in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 44 pp. Production note: The Northern Goshawk laingi subspecies Accipiter gentilis laingi was formerly designated by COSEWIC as the Queen Charlotte Goshawk Accipiter gentilis laingi.
    [Show full text]
  • Accipiter Gentilis -- (Linnaeus, 1758)
    Accipiter gentilis -- (Linnaeus, 1758) ANIMALIA -- CHORDATA -- AVES -- ACCIPITRIFORMES -- ACCIPITRIDAE Common names: Northern Goshawk; Autour des palombes; Eurasian Goshawk; Goshawk European Red List Assessment European Red List Status LC -- Least Concern, (IUCN version 3.1) Assessment Information Year published: 2015 Date assessed: 2015-03-31 Assessor(s): BirdLife International Reviewer(s): Symes, A. Compiler(s): Ashpole, J., Burfield, I., Ieronymidou, C., Pople, R., Wheatley, H. & Wright, L. Assessment Rationale European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) At both European and EU27 scales this species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence 10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). Despite the fact that the population trend appears to be decreasing, the decline is not believed to be sufficiently rapid to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (30% decline over ten years or three generations). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern within both Europe and the EU27. Occurrence Countries/Territories of Occurrence Native: Albania; Andorra; Armenia; Austria; Azerbaijan; Belarus; Belgium; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Bulgaria; Croatia; Cyprus; Czech Republic; Denmark; Estonia; Finland; France; Georgia; Germany; Greece; Hungary; Ireland, Rep. of; Italy; Latvia; Liechtenstein; Lithuania; Luxembourg; Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of; Moldova; Montenegro; Netherlands; Norway; Poland; Portugal; Romania; Russian Federation; Serbia; Slovakia; Slovenia; Spain; Sweden; Switzerland; Turkey; Ukraine; United Kingdom; Gibraltar (to UK) Vagrant: Canary Is. (to ES) Population The European population is estimated at 166,000-220,000 pairs, which equates to 332,000-440,000 mature individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • LEGGED BUZZARD &Lpar
    ]. RaptorRes. 21(1):8-13 ¸ 1987 The Raptor ResearchFoundation, Inc. NOTES ON THE BREEDING BIOLOGY OF THE LONG-LEGGED BUZZARD (Buteorufinus) IN BULGARIA ILIYA Ts. VATEV ABSTRACT.--Observationswere madeon Long-leggedBuzzard (Buteorufinus) nests in Bulgariabetween 1978-83. Egg hatchinginterval was 29-44 hr. First nestlingplumage color was dirty-white tingedbeige, cere and legs yellow; iris color changedfrom sepia at hatchingto brownish yellow-greyat fiedging. Featherswere visibleby two wk. Until two wk old, nestlingsassumed a "frozen" postureon their bellies when alarmed. Nestlingsfed unaided by the fourth wk. Fledging beganby d 49. Adults were aggressive towards humanswhile young were downy, but aggressionlessened as young got older. The Long-leggedBuzzard (Buteorufinus) is one openplains beyond. The area is grazedby sheepand cattle of Europe'sleast studiedraptors. Little detailedin- attendedby herdsmen.The landscapeis variedby scattered thorn scrub,streamside willows (Salix sp.), Carpinusorz- formation on the breeding cycle of the speciesis entalisand a smallconifer plantation (Pinus nigra). Nearest availablein the literature, especiallywith regard to arable groundis one km away. Climate is temperatecon- its nestlings(Dementiev and Gladkov 1954; Brown tinental; av. rainfall = 592.1 liter/m 2 (1981-84); alti- and Amadon 1968; Glutz et al. 1971; Harrison 1975; tude -- 7-800 m. Cramp and Simmons1980). Recently,Michev et al. RESULTS (1984) reported14 definitebreeding records for Bul- The Nest. Long-leggedBuzzards used the same garia and estimatedthe country'spopulation to be nest at Pekliuka in 1981, 1983, and (T. Michev, around 50 pairs. Also reported were noteson nest pers. comm.) 1984. A new nest, relatively slight in sites,egg size, breeding season and foodof the species.
    [Show full text]