DOCSLIB.ORG

An Overview of Logging in Cameroon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Overview of Logging in Cameroon Linking forests & people www.globalforestwatch.org AN OVERVIEW OF LOGGING IN CAMEROON An Initiative of WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE A Global Forest Watch Cameroon Report What Is Global Forest Watch? GFW’s principal role is to provide access to better What is GFW Cameroon? information about development activities in forests Approximately half of the forests that initially cov- and their environmental impact. By reporting on Global Forest Watch Cameroon (GFW Cameroon) ered our planet have been cleared, and another 30 development activities and their impact, GFW fills is an affiliate of the international Global Forest percent have been fragmented, or degraded, or a vital information gap. By making this information Watch program. It is currently composed of three replaced by secondary forest. Urgent steps must be accessible to everyone (including governments, Cameroonian nongovernmental environmental taken to safeguard the remaining fifth, located industry, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), organizations (NGOs): Cameroon Environmental mostly in the Amazon Basin, Central Africa, forest consumers, and wood consumers), GFW Watch (CEW), the Centre pour l’Environnement et le Canada, Southeast Asia, and Russia. As part of promotes both transparency and accountability. We Développement (CED), and the Centre International this effort, the World Resources Institute in 1997 are convinced that better information about forests d’Etudes Forestières et Environnementales (CIEFE). started Global Forest Watch (GFW). will lead to better decisionmaking about forest A national advisory committee (Groupe de Suivi)— management and use, which ultimately will result including representatives from national and inter- Global Forest Watch is identifying the threats in forest management regimes that provide a full range national NGOs, government management agencies, weighing on the last frontier forests—the world’s of benefits for both present and future generations. and research institutions—offers periodic review remaining large, relatively undisturbed forest input on GFW Cameroon’s activities and products. ecosystems. By 2005, our goal is to have Global To this end, GFW (i) tracks existing and planned The GFW international network, with help from Forest Watch chapters up and running in 21 countries. development activities, (ii) identifies the actors— other partners, provides technical and financial These nations account for about 80 percent of the including companies, individuals, government support for GFW Cameroon, with the goal of world’s remaining forests. In the longer term, GFW agencies, and others—engaged in this development, building capacity for independent, locally driven monitoring will extend to nonfrontier forest regions, (iii) monitors the implementation of laws and regu- monitoring and reporting within the country. where ongoing development threatens smaller tracts lations established in the interest of forest stewardship, of unique, and often highly diverse, natural forests. and (iv) provides data on forest ecosystems to All data presented in this report are available at highlight the environmental and economic tradeoffs www.globalforestwatch.org or by contacting us at GFW is an independent network of national and/or that development options entail. the address provided on the inside back cover. local organizations that monitor and map logging, mining, road-building, and other forest development GFW is an information service. Our mandate is within major forested regions of the world. Each strictly limited to providing objective, credible, organization gathers and reports similar information, peer-reviewed data, and making that information with an emphasis on comparable, preferably mapped widely available. information that covers entire forest ecosystems. All Global Forest Watch publications are available We also recognize that forests straddle political from the World Resources Institute as well as on boundaries. At the global level, we hope that the our website at www.globalforestwatch.org. publication of national reports using comparable data and mapping techniques will provide, in the aggregate, a valuable picture of global trends in development activities and environmental condi- tions in the world’s forests. AN OVERVIEW OF LOGGING IN CAMEROON Linking forests & people www.globalforestwatch.org A Global Forest Watch Cameroon Report A Global Forest Watch Report prepared by: Henriette Bikié, Jean-Gaël Collomb, Louis Djomo, Susan Minnemeyer, Roger Ngoufo, and Samuel Nguiffo Contributions by: Théophile Ndjodo, Ousseynou Ndoye, Laurie Clark, Elizabeth Selig, and Dirk Bryant Global Forest Watch is an Initiative of the World Resources Institute 2000 World Resources Institute Washington, DC www.wri.org/wri/ Carollyne Hutter Editor Hyacinth Billings Production Manager Designed by: Papyrus Design Group, Washington, DC Cover photographs © 1998 JG Collomb © 1997 John Siddle © 1997 David Wilkie Each World Resources Institute report represents a timely, scholarly treatment of a subject of public concern. WRI takes responsibility for choosing the study topics and guaranteeing its authors and researchers freedom of inquiry. It also solicits and responds to the guidance of advisory panels and expert reviewers. Unless otherwise stated, however, all the interpretation and findings set forth in WRI publications are those of the authors. Copyright © 2000 World Resources Institute. All rights reserved. ISBN 1-56973-437-2 ENGLISH ISBN 1-56973-438-0 FRENCH Printed in the United States of America on chlorine-free paper with recycled content of 50%, 20% of which is post-consumer. CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 TERMINOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 KEY FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 ASSESSING LOGGING DEVELOPMENT IN CAMEROON ................................................................................................................................................. 10 How Much Forest Remains? .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 How Are the Forests Valued? ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Wood Products ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 Biodiversity ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 15 Ecosystem Services ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 15 How is Forest Development Evolving? ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Who is Logging Cameroon’s Forests? ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 23 How is Forest Development Legislated and Regulated? ............................................................................................................................................................ 25 How Does Compliance Align with Existing Legislation? ......................................................................................................................................................... 28 Results of the Coarse-scale Assessment ............................................................................................................................................................................... 28 Results of the Fine-scale Assessment ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MINMAP Région Du Centre SERVICES DECONCENTRES REGIONAUX ET DEPARTEMENTAUX
    MINMAP Région du Centre SERVICES DECONCENTRES REGIONAUX ET DEPARTEMENTAUX N° Désignation des MO/MOD Nbre de Marchés Montant des Marchés N° page 1 Services déconcentrés Régionaux 19 2 278 252 000 4 Département de la Haute Sanaga 2 Services déconcentrés départementaux 6 291 434 000 7 3 COMMUNE DE BIBEY 2 77 000 000 8 4 COMMUNE DE LEMBE YEZOUM 8 119 000 000 8 5 COMMUNE DE MBANDJOCK 3 50 000 000 10 6 COMMUNE DE MINTA 5 152 500 000 10 7 COMMUNE DE NANGA-EBOKO 12 139 500 000 11 8 COMMUNE DE NKOTENG 5 76 000 000 13 9 COMMUNE DE NSEM 1 27 000 000 13 TOTAL 42 932 434 000 Département de la Lekié 10 Services déconcentrés départementaux 8 268 357 000 14 11 COMMUNE DE BATCHENGA 2 35 000 000 15 12 COMMUNE DE LOBO 8 247 000 000 15 13 COMMUNE DE MONATELE 11 171 500 000 16 14 COMMUNE DE SA'A 16 384 357 000 18 15 COMMUNE D'ELIG-MFOMO 7 125 000 000 20 16 COMMUNE D'EVODOULA 9 166 250 000 21 17 COMMUNE D'OBALA 14 223 500 000 22 18 COMMUNE D'OKOLA 22 752 956 000 24 19 COMMUNE D’EBEBDA 6 93 000 000 27 TOTAL 103 2 466 920 000 Département du Mbam et Inoubou 20 Services déconcentrés départementaux 4 86 000 000 28 21 COMMUNE DE BAFIA 5 75 500 000 28 22 COMMUNE DE BOKITO 12 213 000 000 29 23 COMMUNE DE KIIKI 4 134 000 000 31 24 COMMUNE DE KONYAMBETA 6 155 000 000 32 25 COMMUNE DE DEUK 2 77 000 000 33 26 COMMUNE DE MAKENENE 3 17 000 000 33 27 COMMUNE DE NDIKINIMEKI 4 84 000 000 34 28 COMMUNE D'OMBESSA 5 91 000 000 34 29 COMMUNE DE NITOUKOU 6 83 000 000 35 TOTAL 51 1 015 500 000 MINMAP/DIVISION DE LA PROGRAMMATION ET DU SUIVI DES MARCHES PUBLICS Page 1 de 88 N° Désignation
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Index of Common Names: Supplement to Tropical Timbers of the World (AH 607)
    Complete Index of Common Names: Supplement to Tropical Timbers of the World (AH 607) by Nancy Ross Preface Since it was published in 1984, Tropical Timbers of the World has proven to be an extremely valuable reference to the properties and uses of tropical woods. It has been particularly valuable for the selection of species for specific products and as a reference for properties information that is important to effective pro- cessing and utilization of several hundred of the most commercially important tropical wood timbers. If a user of the book has only a common or trade name for a species and wishes to know its properties, the user must use the index of common names beginning on page 451. However, most tropical timbers have numerous common or trade names, depending upon the major region or local area of growth; furthermore, different species may be know by the same common name. Herein lies a minor weakness in Tropical Timbers of the World. The index generally contains only the one or two most frequently used common or trade names. If the common name known to the user is not one of those listed in the index, finding the species in the text is impossible other than by searching the book page by page. This process is too laborious to be practical because some species have 20 or more common names. This supplement provides a complete index of common or trade names. This index will prevent a user from erroneously concluding that the book does not contain a specific species because the common name known to the user does not happen to be in the existing index.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversification of Tree Crops: Domestication of Companion Crops for Poverty Reduction and Environmental Services
    Expl Agric. (2001), volume 37, pp. 279±296 Printed in Great Britain Copyright # 2001 Cambridge University Press REVIEW PAPER DIVERSIFICATION OF TREE CROPS: DOMESTICATION OF COMPANION CROPS FOR POVERTY REDUCTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES By R. R. B. LEAKEY{ and Z. TCHOUNDJEU{ {Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0QB, Scotland, UK and {International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, PO Box 2067, YaoundeÂ, Cameroon (Accepted 19 January 2001) SUMMARY New initiatives in agroforestry are seeking to integrate indigenous trees, whose products have traditionally been gathered from natural forests, into tropical farming systems such as cacao farms. This is being done to provide from farms, marketable timber and non-timber forest products that will enhance rural livelihoods by generating cash for resource-poor rural and peri-urban households. There are many potential candidate species for domestication that have commercial potential in local, regional or even international markets. Little or no formal research has been carried out on many of these hitherto wild species to assess potential for genetic improvement, reproductive biology or suitability for cultivation. With the participation of subsistence farmers a number of projects to bring candidate species into cultivation are in progress, however. This paper describes some tree domestication activities being carried out in southern Cameroon, especially with Irvingia gabonensis (bush mango; dika nut) and Dacryodes edulis (African plum; safoutier). As part of this, fruits and kernels from 300 D. edulis and 150 I. gabonensis trees in six villages of Cameroon and Nigeria have been quantitatively characterized for 11 traits to determine combinations de®ning multi-trait ideotypes for a genetic selection programme.
    [Show full text]
  • GEF Prodoc TRI Cameroon 28 02 18
    International Union for the Conservation of Nature Country: Cameroon PROJECT DOCUMENT Project Title: Supporting Landscape Restoration and Sustainable Use of local plant species and tree products (Bambusa ssp, Irvingia spp, etc) for Biodiversity Conservation, Sustainable Livelihoods and Emissions Reduction in Cameroon BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT The Republic of Cameroon has a diverse ecological landscape, earning her the title “Africa in Miniature”. The southern portions of Cameroon’s forests are part of the Congo Basin forest ecosystem, the second largest remaining contiguous block of rainforest on Earth, after the Amazon. In addition to extensive Mangrove belts, Cameroon also holds significant portions of the Lower Guinea Forest Ecosystems and zones of endemism extending into densely settled portions of the Western Highlands and Montagne forests. The North of the country comprising the Dry Sudano-Sahelian Savannah Zones is rich in wildlife, and home to dense human and livestock populations. Much of the population residing in these areas lives in extreme poverty. This diversity in biomes makes Cameroon one of the most important and unique hotspots for biodiversity in Africa. However, human population growth, migrations, livelihoods strategies, rudimentary technologies and unsustainable land use for agriculture and small-scale forestry, energy and livestock, are contributing to biodiversity loss and landscape degradation in Cameroon. Despite strong institutional frameworks, forest and environmental policies/legislation, and a human resource capital, Cameroon’s network of biomes that include all types of forests, tree-systems, savannahs, agricultural mosaics, drylands, etc., are progresively confronted by various forms of degradation. Degradation, which is progressive loss of ecosystem functions (food sources, water quality and availability, biodversity, soil fertility, etc), now threatens the livelihoods of millions of Cameroonians, especially vulnerable groups like women, children and indigenous populations.
    [Show full text]
  • CMR-3W-Cash-Transfer-Partners V3.4
    CAMEROON: 3W Operational Presence - Cash Programming [as of December 2016] Organizations working for cash 10 programs in Cameroon Organizations working in Organizations by Cluster Food security 5 International NGO 5 Multi-Sector cash 5 Government 2 Economic Recovery 3 Red Cross & Red /Livelihood 2 Crescent Movement Nutrition 1 UN Agency 1 WASH 1 Number of organizations Multi-Sector Cash by departments 15 5 distinct organizations 9 organizations conducting only emergency programs 1 organizations conducting only regular programs Number of organizations by departments 15 Economic Recovery/Livelihood Food security 3 distinct organizations 5 distinct organizations Number of organizations Number of organizations by department by department 15 15 Nutrition WASH 3 distinct organizations 1 organization Number of organizations Number of organizations by department by department 15 15 Creation: December 2016 Sources: Cash Working group, UNOCHA and NGOs More information: https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/en/operations/cameroon/cash )HHGEDFNRFKDFDPHURRQ#XQRUJ 7KHERXQGDULHVDQGQDPHVVKRZQDQGWKHGHVLJQDWLRQVXVHGRQWKLVPDSGRQRWLPSO\RI̙FLDOHQGRUVHPHQWRUDFFHSWDQFHE\WKH8QLWHG1DWLRQV CAMEROON:CAMEROON: 3W Operational Presence - Cash Programming [as of December 2016] ADAMAOUA FAR NORTH NORTH 4 distinct organizations 9 distinct organizations 1 organization DJEREM DIAMARE FARO MINJEC CRF MINEPAT CRS IRC MAYO-BANYO LOGONE-ET-CHARI MAYO-LOUTI MINEPAT MINEPAT WFP, PLAN CICR MMBERE MAYO-REY PLAN PUI MINEPAT CENTRE MAYO-DANAY 1 organization MINEPAT LITTORAL 1 organization
    [Show full text]
  • Approved by the Ministry of the Environment and Forests
    Project of Independent Observation in Support of Forest Law Enforcement in Cameroon Approved by the Ministry of the Environment and Forests Report No. 027 En Joint Mission: Central Control Unit – Independent Observer ------------------------------- Title: None Location: Central Province Mission date: September 20-21, 2002 Company: GCI Nyanzom, IBC Independent Observer (Global Witness): Mr. Stuart Wilson, Project Director Mr. Owada Jean Cyrille, Technical Assistant Mr. Tangyie Ché Célestine, Driver TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 1 2. RESOURCES USED ............................................................................................. 2 3. COMPOSITION OF THE MISSION................................................................ 2 4. CONSTRAINTS ..................................................................................................... 2 5. RESULTS OF THE MISSION............................................................................ 2 5.1. Summary of the case ............................................................................................. 2 5.2. Meetings with IBC representatives and various external services representatives 2 5.3. Official hearing of the Ombessa forest law enforcement official ......................... 3 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS......................................... 4 Appendix .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • N I G E R I a C H a D Central African Republic Congo
    CAMEROON: LOCATIONS OF UNHCR PERSONS OF CONCERN (September 2020) ! PERSONNES RELEVANT DE Maïné-Soroa !Magaria LA COMPETENCE DU HCR (POCs) Geidam 1,951,731 Gashua ! ! CAR REFUGEES ING CurAi MEROON 306,113 ! LOGONE NIG REFUGEES IN CAMEROON ET CHARI !Hadejia 116,409 Jakusko ! U R B A N R E F U G E E S (CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC AND 27,173 NIGERIAN REFUGEE LIVING IN URBAN AREA ARE INCLUDED) Kousseri N'Djamena !Kano ASYLUM SEEKERS 9,332 Damaturu Maiduguri Potiskum 1,032,942 INTERNALLY DISPLACED PERSO! NS (IDPs) * RETURNEES * Waza 484,036 Waza Limani Magdeme Number of refugees MAYO SAVA Mora ! < 10,000 EXTRÊME-NORD Mokolo DIAMARÉ Biu < 50,000 ! Maroua ! Minawao MAYO Bauchi TSANAGA Yagoua ! Gom! be Mubi ! MAYO KANI !Deba MAYO DANAY < 75000 Kaele MAYO LOUTI !Jos Guider Number! of IDPs N I G E R I A Lafia !Ləre ! < 10,000 ! Yola < 50,000 ! BÉNOUÉ C H A D Jalingo > 75000 ! NORD Moundou Number of returnees ! !Lafia Poli Tchollire < 10,000 ! FARO MAYO REY < 50,000 Wukari ! ! Touboro !Makurdi Beke Chantier > 75000 FARO ET DÉO Tingere ! Beka Paoua Number of asylum seekers Ndip VINA < 10,000 Bocaranga ! ! Borgop Djohong Banyo ADAMAOUA Kounde NORD-OUEST Nkambe Ngam MENCHUM DJEREM Meiganga DONGA MANTUNG MAYO BANYO Tibati Gbatoua Wum BOYO MBÉRÉ Alhamdou !Bozoum Fundong Kumbo BUI CENTRAL Mbengwi MEZAM Ndop MOMO AFRICAN NGO Bamenda KETUNJIA OUEST MANYU Foumban REPUBLBICaoro BAMBOUTOS ! LEBIALEM Gado Mbouda NOUN Yoko Mamfe Dschang MIFI Bandjoun MBAM ET KIM LOM ET DJEREM Baham MENOUA KOUNG KHI KOUPÉ Bafang MANENGOUBA Bangangte Bangem HAUT NKAM Calabar NDÉ SUD-OUEST
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Global Tree Conservation Atlas
    Conserving wildlife since 1903 Towards a Global Tree Conservation atlas Mapping the status and distribution of the world’s threatened tree species Adrian Newton, Sara Oldfield, Gerardo Fragoso, Paul Mathew, Lera Miles, Mary Edwards Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Conserving wildlife since 1903 UNEP World Conservation Fauna & Flora International Monitoring Centre Great Eastern House 219 Huntingdon Road Tenison Road Cambridge CB3 0DL Cambridge CB1 2TT United Kingdom United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1223 277314 Tel: +44 (0) 1223 571000 Fax: +44 (0) 1223 277136 Fax: +44 (0) 1223 461481 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.unep-wcmc.org Website: www.fauna-flora.org Director: Mark Collins Director: Mark Rose THE UNEP WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE is the FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL, founded in 1903 and the world’s biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the first international conservation organization, acts to conserve United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the world’s threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing foremost intergovernmental environmental organization. solutions that are sustainable, are based on sound science UNEP-WCMC aims to help decision-makers recognize the and take account of human needs. The organization currently value of biodiversity to people everywhere, and to apply this works in over 60 countries, including more than 25 as part of knowledge to all that they do. The Centre’s challenge is to the Global Trees Campaign. transform complex data into policy-relevant information, to build tools and systems for analysis and integration, and to support the needs of nations and the international community as they engage in joint programmes of action.
    [Show full text]
  • Obtaining Forest Foods from Timber Trees in Cameroon: How Far Do People Walk to Collect Fruits and Caterpillars? P
    Obtaining forest foods from timber trees in Cameroon: How far do people walk to collect fruits and caterpillars? P. Maukonen*, P. Donn*, L. Snook** *Bioversity International, P.O. Box 2008 Messa, Yaounde Cameroon **Bioversity International, Via dei Tre Denari, 472/a, 00057 Maccarese, Rome, Italy Abstract Approximately 61% of timber species in the Congo Basin also bear locally used non- Multiple-use Tree timber forest products. Amongst these are edible fruits of Moabi (Baillonella Species toxisperma), and edible caterpillars on Sapelli (Entandrophragma cylindricum) and Tali (Erythrophleum suaveolens). Participatory mapping combining GPS coordinates Sapelli (Entandrophragma cylindricum) and interviews was carried out with 5 female and 5 male collectors in each of two hosts vast quantities of Imbrasia villages adjacent to each of two logging concessions in Cameroon to: (1) locate the (Nudaurelia) oyemensis, one of the 82 trees from which men and women obtained these foods, in space and on maps that species of caterpillars and larvae included the boundaries of nearby logging concessions; (2) determine the distances commonly consumed in Central Africa. It is travelled by men and women to collect these wild resources (3) gather information also the second most important timber species in terms of volume exported from on the trees and the collection, transformation and sale of these NTFPs, and (4) the region, contributing 1.3 million cubic assess the potential impacts of logging activities on local people’s access to these metres of wood annually to the export food resources. market (Bayol et al., 2012), and is considered vulnerable to extinction as a During one day collecting trips people walk an average of 2.7 km (± 1.42) from the result of this level of demand (Hawthorne, 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Trafficking in Cameroon and Republic of the Congo
    Wildlife Traffcking in Cameroon and Republic of the Congo A Scoping Review and Recommendations for Cooperation with China A / Room 032, unit 1, foreign affairs offce building, tower garden, No. 14, South Liangmahe Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing P.C / 100600 T / 86-10-8532-5910 F / 86-10-8532-5038 E / [email protected] http://www.geichina.org Acknowledgement We would like to give special thanks to UK’s Department for International Development (DFID) for its funding support on this project. We are very grateful of Mr. Simon Essissima from the Ministry of Forestry and Wildlife of Cameroon and Mr. Nan Jiang from the Nanjing Forest Police College of China for their invaluable feedbacks and suggestions to the report. We would also like to thank Mme. Jiaman Jin, Executive Director of GEI, Mr. Chun Li, Senior Consultant of GEI, Mr. Peng Ren, Program Manager of Overseas Investment, Trade and the Environment, and Ms. Lin Ji, Executive Secretary of GEI for their guidance, support and participation throughout the research project. Finally, we would like to thank our interns who have contributed to the translation and editing of this report: Ms. Qiuyi Wang, Ms. Qian Zhu, Ms. Diana Gomez. 01 02 Acronyms Introduction ACFAP Congolese Wildlife and Protected Areas Agency [1] Wildlife traffcking is increasingly considered a threat to global conservation efforts. With global momentum to combat international wildlife traffcking, countries along the ANAFOR National Forest Development Support Agency "Congo Basin Forests," Greenpeace supply chain should take collective action to ensure effective disruption of the traffcking CAR Central African Republic USA, accessed August 09, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Programmation De La Passation Et De L'exécution Des Marchés Publics
    PROGRAMMATION DE LA PASSATION ET DE L’EXÉCUTION DES MARCHÉS PUBLICS EXERCICE 2021 JOURNAUX DE PROGRAMMATION DES MARCHÉS DES SERVICES DÉCONCENTRÉS ET DES COLLECTIVITÉS TERRITORIALES DÉCENTRALISÉES RÉGION DU CENTRE EXERCICE 2021 SYNTHESE DES DONNEES SUR LA BASE DES INFORMATIONS RECUEILLIES N° Désignation des MO/MOD Nbre de Marchés Montant des Marchés N°Page 1 Services déconcentrés Régionaux 17 736 645 000 3 2 Communauté Urbaine de Yaoundé 62 10 459 000 000 5 Département de la Haute Sanaga 3 Services déconcentrés départementaux 2 24 000 000 10 4 Commune de Bibey 12 389 810 000 10 5 Commune de Lembe Yezoum 17 397 610 000 11 6 Commune de Mbandjock 12 214 000 000 12 7 Commune de Minta 8 184 500 000 12 8 Commune de Nanga Ebogo 21 372 860 000 13 9 Commune de Nkoteng 12 281 550 000 14 10 Commune de Nsem 5 158 050 000 15 TOTAL 89 2 022 380 000 Département de la Lekié 11 Services déconcentrés départementaux 9 427 000 000 16 12 Commune de Batchenga 8 194 000 000 17 13 Commune d'Ebebda 10 218 150 000 18 14 Commune d'Elig-Mfomo 8 174 000 000 19 15 Commune d'Evodoula 10 242 531 952 20 16 Commune de Lobo 11 512 809 000 21 17 Commune de Monatélé 12 288 500 000 22 18 commune d'Obala 11 147 000 000 23 19 commune d'Okola 14 363 657 000 24 20 commune de Sa'a 17 319 500 000 25 TOTAL 110 2 887 147 952 Département du Mbam et Inoubou 21 Services déconcentrés départementaux 6 144 385 000 27 22 Commune Bafia 13 213 500 000 27 23 Commune de Bokito 9 167 500 000 28 24 Commune de DEUK 17 379 500 000 29 25 Commune Kiiki 10 285 000 000 30 26 Commune Konyambeta 12 295
    [Show full text]
  • Cholera Outbreak
    Emergency appeal final report Cameroon: Cholera outbreak Emergency appeal n° MDRCM011 GLIDE n° EP-2011-000034-CMR 31 October 2012 Period covered by this Final Report: 04 April 2011 to 30 June 2012 Appeal target (current): CHF 1,361,331. Appeal coverage: 21%; <click here to go directly to the final financial report, or here to view the contact details> Appeal history: This Emergency Appeal was initially launched on 04 April 2011 for CHF 1,249,847 for 12 months to assist 87,500 beneficiaries. CHF 150,000 was initially allocated from the Federation’s Disaster Relief Emergency Fund (DREF) to support the national society in responding by delivering assistance. Operations update No 1 was issued on 30 May 2011 to revise the objectives and budget of the operation. Operations update No 2 was issued on 31st May 2011 to provide financial statement against revised budget. Operations update No 3 was issued on 12 October 2011 to summarize the achievements 6 months into the operation. Operations update No 4 was issued on 29 February 2012 to extend the timeframe of the operation from 31st March to 30 June 2012 to cover the funding agreement with the American Embassy in Cameroon. PBR No M1111087 was submitted as final report of this operation to the American Embassy in Cameroon on 03 August 2012. Throughout the operation, Cameroon Red Cross volunteers sensitized the populations on PBR No M1111127 was submitted as final report of this how to avoid cholera. Photo/IFRC operation to the British Red Cross on 14 August 2012. Summary: A serious cholera epidemic affected Cameroon since 2010.
    [Show full text]