DOCSLIB.ORG

And Others Going Metric: an Analysis of Experiences in Five Planning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
And Others Going Metric: an Analysis of Experiences in Five Planning DOCUMENT RESUME ED 104 725 SE 019 039 AUTHOR Chalupsky, Albert B.; And Others TITLE Going Metric: An Analysis of Experiences in Five Nations.and Their Implications for U.S. Educational. Planning. Final Report. INSTITUTION American Institutes for Research in the Behavioral Sciences, Palo Alto, Calif. SPONS AGENCY National Inst. of Education (DREW), Washington, D.C. REPORT-NO AIR-41800-2/74-FR PUB DATE 74 NOTE 140p.; For a related document, see SE 019 040 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC-$6.97 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS Curriculum; Educational Experience; *Educational Planning; *Instruction; International Piograms; *Mathematics Education;.Measurement; *Metric System; Research; *Surveys; Teacher Education ABSTRACT This study was undertaken in order to gather information concerning conversion to the metric system by other countries which sight be useful in planning for conversion by the United States. Representatives of organizations in five countries (United Kingdom, Australia, South Africa, stew Zealand, and _Canada) which had recently converted to the metric system were surveyed. The survey instrument was designed to cover 15 key areas related to influences for and resistance to conversion, scheduling, teaching strategies, development of materials and programs, and suggestions for the United States. Concurrently with the survey the investigators' developed an overseas data collection network and a complex information storage system, and conducted an intensive literature review. Findings are related to:(1) the identification of groups exerting influence for metrication; (2) strategies, materials and special problems of metric instruction; (3) teacher training; and (4) changes respondents would make in their country's approaches. Nine implications and recommendations are posed by the investigators. This report includes discussionS of the programs in each of the five countries and an extensive bibliography. (SD) U.S. OEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EOUCATION & WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EOUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO DUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGIN ATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED 00 NOT NECESSARILY REPRE SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF rq EOUCATION POSITION OR POLICY r- FINAL REPORT irf1 CD r--1 C3 W GOING METRIC: AN ANALYSIS OF EXPERIENCES IN FIVE NATIONS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR U. S. EDUCATIONAL PLANNING ip 1 i NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION PROJECT NO. 3-2173 ALBERT B. CHALUPSKY JACK J. CRAWFORD EDWIN M. CARR 1974 I iroria4.660111.o, 04' 41110111..1 I I b1 4 "sod 0AMERICAN INSTITU ES FOR RESE RCH 0" 0Post Office Box 1113 f Pa o Alto, California 94302 AIR-41800-2/74-FR FINAL REPORT GOING METRIC: AN ANALYSIS OF EXPERIENCES IN FIVE NATIONS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR U. S. EDUCATIONAL PLANNING National Institute of Education Project No. 3-2173 Albert B. Chalupsky Jack J. Crawford Edwin M. Carr American Institutes for Research in the Behavioral Sciences Palo Alto, California 1974 The research reported herein was performed pursuant to a grant contract with the National Institute of Education, U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Con- tractors undertaking such projects under Government spon- sorship are encouraged to express freely their professional judgment in the conduct of the project. Points of view or opinions stated do not, therefore, necessarily represent official National Institute of Education position or policy. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF FIGURES iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS SUMMARY vii INTRODUCTION 1 Early History of Metric Conversion 1 Recent U. S. Experience 3 Impact of Metric Conversion on Educational Practices 7 OBJECTIVES 11 PROCEDURES 12 Creation of Overseas Data Collection Network 12 Design of Information Storage System 14 Intensive Literature Search and Analysis 18 Direct Survey of Key Organizations 19 OVERVIEW OF METRICATION IN SELECTED COUNTRIES 23 United Kingdom 23 Australia 36 South Africa 49 New Zealand 57 Canada 65 FINDINGS 73 Groups Exerting Positive Influence for Metrication 74 Teacher Training 76 Instructional Strategies 81 Metric Instructional Materials 91 Problems in Metric Education, and Some Solutions 93 Special Problems in the Instruction and Use of the Metric System 108 Respondents Would Change their Country's Approach to Metri- cation 112 iii 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont.) Page IMPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR U. S. EDUCATION 116 REFERENCES 124 APPENDIX A Systme International d'Unites -(SI) A-1 APPENDIX B - OrganizationsRepresented by Survey-Respondents . B-1 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Summary Data on OrganizationsContacted and Responding 22 2 Representative Example of British TeacherTraining Courses in 1970 77 3 An Example of the Training ApproachUsed in British Industry (Petroleum Board, 1972) 87 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page Organization of the British MetricationBoard (Metrication Board, 1970) 26 2 Organization of the Australian MetricConversion Board (Metric Conversion Board, 1973a,p. 13) 39 3 Stamps Commemorating Australia's Conversionto the Metric System 48 4 Steering Committees of the Canadian'Metric Commission 69 5 Example of Canadian Pos:_er to Encourage "ThinkingMetric" 72 iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT-S It is impossible to acknowledge the contributions of each of- the hundreds of individuals Who provided the basic information upx1 which this report is based. Of special significance were the contributions of information and materials from the officials and employees of the metric conversion boards and the many other organizations and associations surveyed in the United Kingdom, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand and Canada. Many contributed greatly of their time in responding to our queries. Particularly generous with their assistancewere Dr. H. L. Prekel of the South African Bureau of Standards; Mr. B. McGaw, Staff Inspector, Department of Education, Queensland, Australia; Dr. Iau McCay, Department of Science, Canberra, formerly Secretary to the Education and Industrial Training Advisory Committee of the Australian Metric Conversion Board; and the Baroness Eirehe White, Deputy Chairman of the British Metrication Board. In Canada, special note should be made of the contri butions of Mr. Paul Boire, Executive Director of the Canadian Metric Commission, and his staff; Mr. John Buchanan of the Consumer Research Branch, Department of Consumer and Corporate Affairs; and Professor H. D. Allen of the Nova Scotia Teachers College. Many individuals in the U. S. also supplied helpful assistance. Particularly noteworthy was the continued encouragement and assistance offered by Mr. Jeffrey Odom of the Metric Information Offi:: cf -the National Bureau of Standards and the information provided by Mr. Louis Barbrow of the same office. Throughout the course of this project, Dr. Robert Beezer, NIE Project Officer, provided valuable advice and counsel. The study could not have been conducted without the assistance of our overseas representatives: Dr. and Mrs. David Hawkridge in Britain, Dr. Patrick McDonnell of Australia, and Professor M. D. Hills of New Zealand. Dr. David Beswick of Australia supplied very useful information and advice during the project planning stage.Mr. and Mrs. A. O. H. Roberts v were instrumental during the early stages of the project and provided important information during their visitsto Great Britain and South Africa. Finally. we would like to cite the excellentsupport. provided by Ms. Laura.Newmark, Ms. Roberta Steiner and Mr. John French ofthe AIR technical Library, and the contributions of the AIR studyteam which included Ms. Karen Cloyd, Ms. Carolyn Davis and Ms. CarolynUyemuta, in addition to the three authors. Needless to say, any errors theremay be in this report are the responsibility of the authors. Albert B. Chalupsky Project Director vi SUMMARY The'U. S. -is now approaching total commitment to "going metric." This pervasive change will present substantial education and training problems. We are in a unique position to make effective and timely use of the metric conversion experiences now occurring in five other countries: the United Kingdom, Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, and Canada. The major objectives of this exploratory study were: to review metric conversion in these selected foreign countries to identify atten- dant educational problems; to ,examine the edudational changes made to facilitate conversion; to relate such conversion steps -to problems and progress; and to make recommendations on how the experiences of countries undergoing conversion can best be utilized in the U. S. A four-pronged approach was employed to explore metric conversion in education in the five countries. This included: the creation of an overseas data collection network; the design of an information storage system; an intensive literature search and analysis, and a direct survey of key educational organizations. The approach to metrication in the five target countries is reviewed. The recent metrication history of each country is described along with the metric organization developed, the schedule, and major strategies employed. Major findings include: the identification-of groups exerting posi- tive influences for metrication; a description of extent and kinds of teacher training undertaken; a summary of major instructional strategies; and a review of training materials development and usage. Specific problems in metric education are identified and coping strategies-are described. These include problems of: resistance to change; inadequate materials; equipment conversion; teacher training; vocational training;
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Meter Greeters
    Journal of Applied Communications Volume 59 Issue 2 Article 3 The Meter Greeters C. Hamilton Kenney Follow this and additional works at: https://newprairiepress.org/jac This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Kenney, C. Hamilton (1976) "The Meter Greeters," Journal of Applied Communications: Vol. 59: Iss. 2. https://doi.org/10.4148/1051-0834.1951 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Applied Communications by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Meter Greeters Abstract The United States and Canada became meter greeters away back in the 1800's. The U.S. Congress passed an act in 1866 legalizing the metric system for weights and measures use, and metric units were on the law books of the Dominion of Canada in 1875. This article is available in Journal of Applied Communications: https://newprairiepress.org/jac/vol59/iss2/3 Kenney: The Meter Greeters The Meter Greeters C. Hamilton Kenney The United States and Canada became meter greeters away back in the 1800's. The U.S. Congress passed an act in 1866 legalizing the metric system for weights and measures use, and metric units were on the law books of the Dominion of Canada in 1875. The U.S. A. was a signatory to the Treaty of the Meter l signed in Paris, France. in 1875, establishing the metric system as an international measurement system, but Canada did not become a signatory nation until 1907.
    [Show full text]
  • Varying Constants, Gravitation and Cosmology
    Varying constants, Gravitation and Cosmology Jean-Philippe Uzan Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, UMR-7095 du CNRS, Universit´ePierre et Marie Curie, 98 bis bd Arago, 75014 Paris (France) and Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, Cape Town University, Rondebosch 7701 (South Africa) and National Institute for Theoretical Physics (NITheP), Stellenbosch 7600 (South Africa). email: [email protected] http//www2.iap.fr/users/uzan/ September 29, 2010 Abstract Fundamental constants are a cornerstone of our physical laws. Any constant varying in space and/or time would reflect the existence of an almost massless field that couples to mat- ter. This will induce a violation of the universality of free fall. It is thus of utmost importance for our understanding of gravity and of the domain of validity of general relativity to test for their constancy. We thus detail the relations between the constants, the tests of the local posi- tion invariance and of the universality of free fall. We then review the main experimental and observational constraints that have been obtained from atomic clocks, the Oklo phenomenon, Solar system observations, meteorites dating, quasar absorption spectra, stellar physics, pul- sar timing, the cosmic microwave background and big bang nucleosynthesis. At each step we arXiv:1009.5514v1 [astro-ph.CO] 28 Sep 2010 describe the basics of each system, its dependence with respect to the constants, the known systematic effects and the most recent constraints that have been obtained. We then describe the main theoretical frameworks in which the low-energy constants may actually be varying and we focus on the unification mechanisms and the relations between the variation of differ- ent constants.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Heater Formulas and Terminology
    More resources http://waterheatertimer.org/9-ways-to-save-with-water-heater.html http://waterheatertimer.org/Figure-Volts-Amps-Watts-for-water-heater.html http://waterheatertimer.org/pdf/Fundamentals-of-water-heating.pdf FORMULAS & FACTS BTU (British Thermal Unit) is the heat required to raise 1 pound of water 1°F 1 BTU = 252 cal = 0.252 kcal 1 cal = 4.187 Joules BTU X 1.055 = Kilo Joules BTU divided by 3,413 = Kilowatt (1 KW) FAHRENHEIT CENTIGRADE 32 0 41 5 To convert from Fahrenheit to Celsius: 60.8 16 (°F – 32) x 5/9 or .556 = °C. 120.2 49 140 60 180 82 212 100 One gallon of 120°F (49°C) water BTU output (Electric) = weighs approximately 8.25 pounds. BTU Input (Not exactly true due Pounds x .45359 = Kilogram to minimal flange heat loss.) Gallons x 3.7854 = Liters Capacity of a % of hot water = cylindrical tank (Mixed Water Temp. – Cold Water – 1⁄ 2 diameter (in inches) Temp.) divided by (Hot Water Temp. x 3.146 x length. (in inches) – Cold Water Temp.) Divide by 231 for gallons. % thermal efficiency = Doubling the diameter (GPH recovery X 8.25 X temp. rise X of a pipe will increase its flow 1.0) divided by BTU/H Input capacity (approximately) 5.3 times. BTU output (Gas) = GPH recovery x 8.25 x temp. rise x 1.0 FORMULAS & FACTS TEMP °F RISE STEEL COPPER Linear expansion of pipe 50° 0.38˝ 0.57˝ – in inches per 100 Ft. 100° .076˝ 1.14˝ 125° .092˝ 1.40˝ 150° 1.15˝ 1.75˝ Grain – 1 grain per gallon = 17.1 Parts Per million (measurement of water hardness) TC-092 FORMULAS & FACTS GPH (Gas) = One gallon of Propane gas contains (BTU/H Input X % Eff.) divided by about 91,250 BTU of heat.
    [Show full text]
  • Forests Commission Victoria-Australia
    VICTORIA, 1971 FORESTS COMMISSION VICTORIA-AUSTRALIA FIFTY SECOND ANNUAL REPORT FINANCIAL YEAR 1970-71 PRESENTED TO BOTH HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT PURSUANT TO ACT No. 6254, SECTION 35 . .Approximate Cosl of llrport.-Preparation, not given. Printing (250 copies), $1,725.00. No. 14-9238/71.-Price 80 cents FORESTS COMMISSION, VICTORIA TREASURY GARDENS, MELBOURNE, 3002 ANNUAL REPORT 1970-71 In compliance with the provisions of section 35 of the Forests Act 1958 (No. 6254) the Forests Commission has the honour to present to Parliament the following report of its activities and financial statements for the financial year 1970-71. F. R. MOULDS, Chainnan. C. W. ELSEY, Commissioner. A. J. THREADER, Commissioner. F. H. TREYV AUD, Secretary. CONTENTS PAGE 6 FEATURES. 8 fvlANAGEMENT- Forest Area, Surveys, fvlapping, Assessment, Recreation, fvlanagement Plans, Plantation Extension Planning, Forest Land Use Planning, Public Relations. 12 0PERATIONS- Silviculture of Native Forests, Seed Collection, Softwood Plantations, Hardwood Plantations, Total Plantings, Extension Services, Utilization, Grazing, Forest Engineering, Transport, Buildings, Reclamation and Conservation Works, Forest Prisons, Legal, Search and Rescue Operations. 24 ECONOMICS AND fvlARKETING- Features, The Timber Industry, Sawlog Production, Veneer Timber, Pulpwood, Other Forest Products, Industrial Undertakings, Other Activities. 28 PROTBCTION- Fire, Radio Communications, Biological, Fire Research. 32 EDUCATION AND RESEARCH- Education-School of Forestry, University of fvlelbourne, Overseas and Other Studies ; Research-Silviculture, Hydrology, Pathology, Entomology, Biological Survey, The Sirex Wood Wasp; Publications. 38 CONFERENCES. 39 ADMINISTRATJON- Personnel-Staff, Industrial, Number of Employees, Worker's Compensation, Staff Training ; fvlethods ; Stores ; Finance. APPENDICES- 43 I. Statement of Output of Produce. 44 II. Causes of Fires. 44 III. Summary of Fires and Areas Burned.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the National Bureau of Standards
    APPENDIX A FERDINAND RUDOLPH HASSLER First Superintendent of the Coast Survey and of Weights and Measures When Professor Stratton arrived at the Office of Weights and Measures on B Street in Washington in the spring of 1898 to survey its equipment and operations, he found there in the person of Louis A. Fischer, the adjuster, a link with Ferdinand Rudolph Hassler, the first Superintendent of Weights and Measures in the Federal Government. It was in the atmosphere of the office over which Hassler had presided, Stratton said, with its sacred traditions concerning standards, its unsurpassed instrument shop, its world-known experts in the construction and comparison of standards, and especially in the most precise measurement of length and mass, that the boy Fischer, scarcely over 16, found himself when he entered the employ of Govern- ment in a minor capacity [about the year 18801. * * Scarcely 40 years had passed since the end of Hassler's services and the beginning of Fischer's. His first instructors were the direct disciples of Hassler and he knew and talked with those who had come in personal contact with the first superintendent.1 Fischer's reminiscences concerning the early historyof the Weights and Measures office, gathered from his association with the successors of Hassler, were never recorded, to Stratton's regret, and the only biography of Hassler, by Florian Cajori, professor of mathematics at the University of California, centers on his career in the Coast Survey gathered from his association with the successors of Hassler, were never recorded, to in the history of science in the Federal Government, is the principal source of the present sketch.2 1 Stratton, "Address Memorializing Louis Albert Fischer, 1864.—1921," 15th Annual Con.
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Math CHAPTER 1
    © Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Fundamentals of Math CHAPTER 1 OBJECTIVES ■ Understand the difference between the Arabic and Roman numeral systems ■ Translate Arabic numerals to Roman numerals ■ Translate Roman numerals to Arabic numerals ■ Understand the metric system ■ Understand the apothecary system ■ Be able to convert metric to apothecary ■ Be able to convert apothecary to metric ARABIC NUMERALS The Arabic number system uses the numerals 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and zero (0). It is also known as the decimal system. Depending on how these numbers are arranged determines the value of the number. For example, digits 4, 7, and 2 placed together (472) represent the number four hundred seventy-two. A decimal point (.) separates whole numbers, or units, from fractional num- bers, or fractional units. All numbers on the left side of the decimal point are considered whole numbers. All numbers placed on the right of the decimal point are considered fractional units, or less than one whole unit. The following num- ber line shows the relationship of Arabic numerals based on their position in a number. Ten-thousands hundreds ones tenths thousandths hundred-thousandths -----5------8------2-----4-----3---- . ----6------7------9------3------2-------------- thousands tens hundredths ten-thousandths The number 43.6 contains the numerals 4, 3, and 6. This represents forty-three units of one and six-tenths of one unit. Decimals will be covered in more detail in Chapter 2. 1 59612_CH01_FINAL.indd 1 8/20/09 7:38:45 PM © Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION 2 Chapter 1 ■ Fundamentals of Math ROMAN NUMERALS The Roman numeral system does not utilize numerals.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Metric Conversion Manual
    COLORADO OT . DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION METRIC CONVERSION MANUAL January 1994 This manual or any part thereof must not be reproduced in any form without the following disclaimer. The information presented in this publication haS been prepared in accordance with recognized engineering principles and is for general information only. While it is believed to be accurate, this information should not be used or relied upon for any specific application without competent professional examination and verification of its accuracy, suitability, and applicability by a competent licensed engineer or other licensed professional. Publication of the material contained herein is not intended as a representation or warranty on the part of the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) , that this information is suitable for any general or particular use or of freedom from infringement of any patent or patents. Anyone making use of this information assumes all liability arising from such use. Caution must be exercised when relying upon the specifications and codes developed by other bodies and incorporated herein, since such material may be modified or amended from time to time subsequent to the printing of this edition. COOT bears no responsibility for such material other than to incorporate it at the time of the initial publication of this edition, subject to the general comments set forth in the preceding paragraph. Table of Contents Preface ................................................... v Introduction . vii Chapter 1: Metric Units, Terms, Symbols, and Conversion Factors . ... 1-1 Basic Metric . 1-1 Length, Area, Volume and Temperature . 1-7 Civil and Structural Engineering . 1-10 Metric Project Definition ....................... .. 1-12 Chapter 2: Right-Of-Way ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial Units
    Imperial units From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search This article is about the post-1824 measures used in the British Empire and countries in the British sphere of influence. For the units used in England before 1824, see English units. For the system of weight, see Avoirdupois. For United States customary units, see Customary units . Imperial units or the imperial system is a system of units, first defined in the British Weights and Measures Act of 1824, later refined (until 1959) and reduced. The system came into official use across the British Empire. By the late 20th century most nations of the former empire had officially adopted the metric system as their main system of measurement. The former Weights and Measures office in Seven Sisters, London. Contents [hide] • 1 Relation to other systems • 2 Units ○ 2.1 Length ○ 2.2 Area ○ 2.3 Volume 2.3.1 British apothecaries ' volume measures ○ 2.4 Mass • 3 Current use of imperial units ○ 3.1 United Kingdom ○ 3.2 Canada ○ 3.3 Australia ○ 3.4 Republic of Ireland ○ 3.5 Other countries • 4 See also • 5 References • 6 External links [edit] Relation to other systems The imperial system is one of many systems of English or foot-pound-second units, so named because of the base units of length, mass and time. Although most of the units are defined in more than one system, some subsidiary units were used to a much greater extent, or for different purposes, in one area rather than the other. The distinctions between these systems are often not drawn precisely.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C. General Tables of Units of Measurement
    Handbook 44 – 2016 Appendix C – General Tables of Units of Measurement Table of Contents Appendix C. General Tables of Units of Measurement ........................................................ C-3 1. Tables of Metric Units of Measurement ..................................................................................................... C-3 Units of Length ............................................................................................................................................... C-3 Units of Area .................................................................................................................................................. C-3 Units of Liquid Volume .................................................................................................................................. C-4 Units of Volume ............................................................................................................................................. C-4 Units of Mass .................................................................................................................................................. C-4 2. Tables of U.S. Customary Units of Measurement ..................................................................................... C-4 Units of Length ............................................................................................................................................... C-4 Units of Area .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Your Driving Costs 2020
    YOUR DRIVING COSTS 2020 How Much Does it Really Cost to Own a New Car? AAA Average Costs Per Mile Shown to the right are average per-mile costs for 2020 as determined by AAA, based on Miles per Year 10k 15k 20k the driving costs for nine vehicle categories Average Cost 82.36¢ 63.74¢ 54.57¢ weighted by sales. Detailed driving costs in each vehicle category are based on average costs for five top-selling 2020 models selected by AAA and can be found on pages 5 and 6. By category, they are: Î Small Sedan — Honda Civic, Hyundai Elantra, Î Minivan — Chrysler Pacifica, Dodge Grand Nissan Sentra, Toyota Corolla, Volkswagen Jetta Caravan, Kia Sedona, Honda Odyssey, Toyota Sienna Î Medium Sedan — Chevrolet Malibu, Ford Fusion, Honda Accord, Nissan Altima, Toyota Camry Î Pickup Truck — Chevrolet Silverado, Ford F-150, Î Large Sedan — Chevrolet Impala, Chrysler 300, Nissan Titan, Ram 1500 and Toyota Tundra Kia Cadenza, Nissan Maxima, Toyota Avalon Î Hybrid Car — Ford Fusion, Honda Insight, Î Small SUV — Chevrolet Equinox, Ford Escape, Hyundai Ioniq, Toyota Prius Liftback, Toyota Honda CR-V, Nissan Rogue, Toyota RAV4 RAV4 Î Medium SUV — Chevrolet Traverse, Ford Î Electric Car — BMW i3, Chevrolet Bolt, Hyundai Explorer, Honda Pilot, Jeep Grand Cherokee, Kona Electric, Nissan Leaf, Tesla Model 3 Toyota Highlander YOUR DRIVING COSTS | 2020 1 How to Calculate Your Own Driving Costs Start by figuring your gas cost per mile. To do this, you’ll need to keep track of your fueling habits over the course of one year. When your gas tank is full, write down the number of miles on your odometer.
    [Show full text]
  • Metric System and Its History
    Metric System and its History Following is an explanation of the Metric System and its history. This is part of a set of pages on the metric system and metric system conversion; to see the main page (and other related pages), click on Metric System Conversion Table / Chart and Converter for Metric Conversions. The metric system is an internationally agreed set of units for measurement. Since 1960, the metric system is correctly known as the SI system, which is short for Systeme International d'Unites (International System of Units). However, it is still commonly (although somewhat incorrectly) continues to be referred to as the metric system. It has only seven basic measures (known as units), listed in the following table, of which the first four are in common use and the other three are mainly for technical and scientific purposes. Type of measure Standard Unit Symbol length meter m mass (weight) kilogram kg temperature degree Kelvin K (see discussion below) time second s electric current ampere A amount of substance mole mol luminous intensity candela cd Although the kilogram is commonly used as a measure of weight, it is actually defined as a measure of mass. Weight is a measure of how heavy something is, whereas mass is a measure of the amount of matter. To illustrate, a 120 pound woman would weigh only 20 pounds on the moon (due to the moon having lower gravity than the earth), whereas a 50kg woman is 50kg on both the earth and the moon. In other words, her weight (how heavy she is) is less on the moon but her mass (how much matter she has) is unchanged.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrication Leaders Guide 2009
    Metrication Leaders Guide This resource book will help make your inevitable upgrade to the metric system easy, smooth, cheap, and fast. Pat Naughtin 2009 2 of 89 Make your upgrade to the metric system easy, smooth, cheap, and fast Decision making for metrication leaders !! " ! # $ Appendices % & % ! !! ' ! ( )% ' !* " " + , -&..)--/& , - ,$ # ! ,, 0 * + # ( http://metricationmatters.com [email protected] 3 of 89 Make your upgrade to the metric system easy, smooth, cheap, and fast. Deciding on a metrication program confirms that you are a metrication leader – not a follower. You have the courage to stand aside from the crowd, decide what you think is best for yourself and for others, and you are prepared to differ from other people in your class, your work group, your company, or your industry. As a metrication leader, you will soon discover three things: 1 Metrication is technically a simple process. 2 Metrication doesn't take long if you pursue a planned and timed program. 3 Metrication can provoke deeply felt anti-metrication emotions in people who have had no measurement experience with metric measures, or people who have difficulty with change. The first two encourage confidence – it's simple and it won't take long – but the third factor can give you an intense feeling of isolation when you first begin your metrication program. You feel you are learning a new language (you are – a new measuring language), while people around you not only refuse to learn this language, but will do what they can to prevent you from growing and from making progressive developments in your life. The purpose of this book is to give you some supporting arguments to use in your metrication process.
    [Show full text]