Kabbala, Halakha and Kugel: the Case of the Two Handed Blessing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kabbala, Halakha and Kugel: the Case of the Two Handed Blessing Kabbala, Halakha and Kugel: The Case of the Two Handed Blessing Kabbala, Halakha and Kugel: The Case of the Two Handed Blessing* In parshat Vayehi, Yaakov simultaneously blesses his two grandchildren, Ephraim and Menashe by placing one hand upon each of their heads. Today, there is a widespread custom of blessing one own’s children on Friday night (although some only do it on the eve of Yom Kippur). This custom most likely originated with the Hasedi Ashkenaz in the 14th century but quickly spread to the rest of Europe, including France, Spain, and Italy.[1] The exact details of the blessing, however, are subject to some variation. The earliest sources mention only the priestly blessing and not Yaakov’s.[2] It was not until the 18th century, R. Yaakov Emden propose the specific usage of Yaakov’s blessing to his grandsons “God shall make you like Ephraim and Menashe.” Likewise, even within those sources they are inconsistent as to whether both hands are to be used or only one. Some provide that one hand should be used because it has 15 joints the same number of words as in the priestly blessing, while others urge two hands because they ”somekh“ ”סמך“ contain 60 bones which corresponds to the word samach” and“ ”סמ״ך“ to lay hands” to be read as the letter“ correspond to the numerical value of sixty rather than the literal translation equaling the number of letters in Birkat Kohanim. These sources disagree because of the symbolic nature of the hands vis-à-vis the blessing. The anonymous book, Hemdat Yamim, states that one should only use the right hand to bless. Likewise, R. Yitzhak Lampronti records that some refrain from using two hands to avoid “mixing hesed with din” corresponding to the right and left hands respectively. But he rejects that and he used both hands. R. Emden firmly rejects the idea of singlehanded blessings. He explains that Moshe and others used two. Yaakov was but an exception as he wanted to bless both of his grandsons simultaneously because he was already changing the order and wanted to minimize, as much as possible, the differences between the two. Further blessing the younger before the older would be an unforgivable insult. Thus, this was a special case where he was compelled to use one hand.[3] But in the late 19th century, a one handed blessing was suggested because of halakhic reasons. In 1779, R. Yehezkel Landau was born in Vilna. In 1793 he married his cousin, the daughter of Tzvi Hirsch and Mushka Zalkind, Haye Sorah.[4] Unexpectedly, an event surrounding Landau’s wedding would become a touchstone for birkat ha-banim. R. Landau was among those who were privileged to study with the Gaon and received his particular form of learning that eschewed pilpul and focused on peshat.[5] Additionally, R. Landau considered himself a talmid muvhak of and prayed in the same synagogue as R. Hayyim Volozhin.[6] That synagogue, the Parnes Kloyz, also claimed a number of other important members including R. Avraham Abele Poswoler, R. Landau’s brother-in-law.[7] With the death of R. Abele in 1806 R. Landau took over the position as Rosh Av bet Din of Vilna.[8] The position was first offered to R. Akiva Eiger but he turned it down.[9] R. Landau held that position until his death in 1870. Until this point the discussion regarding whether to use two hands or one is limited to symbolic or kabalistic reasons. But there are those who argue that there is a legal issue with using two hands and they attribute this view to the Gaon. Determining the Gaon’s practices is a very difficult task, he did not write a book of customs and instead most of what we have is from second hand or third hand sources, many of which are contradictory or unsupportable.[10] Close to one hundred years after the Gaon died, the siddur, Siddur ha-Gaon be-Nigleh u-Nistar, was published by Naftali Hertz, and for the first time it is recorded that the Gaon only used one hand for a blessing. The source for this practice is unclear. The “Nigleh” portion is generally taken from Ma’ashe Rav and Likutei Dinim meha-Gra, neither of which records this practice. R. Barukh ha-Levi Epstein, however, records a story about that Gaon that is related to the prohibition of a non-kohen reciting the priestly blessings in the synagogue. In Epstein’s commentary on the Torah, Torah Temimah, he posits a novel ruling that not only is a non-kohen prohibited from blessing the congregation but is prohibited from ever using two hands – like the priests – to bless anyone. According to Epstein, such a practice would violate a biblical commandment. But he wanted to address as to why he is the first to raise this issue and rather than concede that he is the source of this innovative ruling he records a story from “a trustworthy source” that “when the Gaon of Vilna blessed R. Yehezkel Landau the Moreh Tzedek of Vilna at his huppa, the Gaon only placed one hand on R. Landau’s head during the blessing. Those present asked the Gaon to explain his practice and he replied that only the priests in the temple can use two hands.”[11] Thus, R. Epstein is able to “toleh atsmo be-ilan gadol” (one should hang themselves on a big tree). Indeed, R. Epstein’s version of the Gaon’s position is still accepted today. Two siddurim that were recently published based upon the Gaon’s practices both record that it was his opinion that one must only use one hand because “only the priests in the temple were permitted to use two hands.” Both cite R. Epstein as their source.[12] That R. Landua received the Gaon’s blessing is attested to on his epithet. ”.חן הוצק בשפתיך כי גברה עליך ברכת אליהו גאון ישראל“ “Grace was placed upon his lips because he was overtaken by the blessing of Eliyahu Gaon of Israel.”[13] Nonetheless, the exact details of that blessing are not as clear. Indeed, the details of R. Epstein’s version that was transmitted by a “trustworthy source” seem somewhat suspect. First, R. Landau because he oversaw מו״ץ would not have been referred to as a the entire bet din system in Vilna and controlled all of the moreh tzedeks. Hence R. Landau was referred to as Rosh Av Bet Second, the Gaon was not known for [ראב״ד.[Din “Ravad” or 14 getting out much. He no longer studied at all in what was known as the Gaon’s kloyz that was located in the Great Synagogue Courtyard (shulhoyf) but studied in the same house he lived in, a location known as the Slutzki building.[15] While R. Landau was well-regarded none of the other histories of Vilna that discuss R. Landau and mention the he studied with the Gaon or the Gaon’s blessing also include the Gaon’s attendance at the wedding.[16] Finally, the Gaon’s commentary to Shulchan Orakh does not mention any issue with a non-kohen using two hands, nor does it appear in any of the books collecting the Gaon’s customs.[17] While admittedly none of the above issues are dispostive, there is a far better reason to discount R. Epstein’s version because there is a more reliable alternative version of the story that R. Epstein records, and according to this version, there is nothing to suggest that the Gaon deliberately avoided using two hands nor that there is any reason to do so. Indeed, stories that are attributed to the Gaon are notoriously unreliable. Already with the first “biography” of the Gaon, R. Dovid Luria cautioned that “the greatness of my teacher, Rabbenu ha-Gadol z’l [ha-Gaon] is such that there are many stories and legends attesting to that greatness there are as many variations, embellishments and deficiencies in every story.” In this instance, however, we have the benefit of hearing the story directly from the protagonist, R. Landau. R. Ben-Tzion Alfes Ben-Tzion Alfes was born in Vilna in 1851 and when he was a young boy spent time in the Gaon’s Kloyz and met R. Landau. Alfes records in his autobiography that “R. Landau recalled that the Shabbat after he was married, his father-in-law brought him to the Gaon to receive a blessing. When he arrived the Gaon was in the middle of his lunch meal, eating kugel.[18] R. Landau was wearing the new fur hat he received for his wedding and when the Gaon went to place his hands on R. Landau’s head, he turned away so that the Gaon wouldn’t dirty the fur hat with his greasy hands. The Gaon ended up just putting one hand on the hat and blessed R. Landau. R. Landau lived very long, over ninety and never required eyeglasses, and for the rest of his life he was disappointed regarding his small mindedness of valuing the hat more than the hands of the Gaon.”[19] כשהייתי בן עשר דרנו בחדר אצל אחד שהיה לו סבא זקן שהיה מכיר את הגאון רבנו אליהו מווילנא זצ”ל, ונהניתי מאד בשעה שאבי ז”ל ישב אצלו לשמוע ספורים מהגר”א, וכאשר אחרי נשואי קבעתי מקומי ללמוד ולהתפלל בקלויז הגר”א, הכרתי שם זקן אחד שהיה חתן הגאון ר’ אברהם (בעל מעלות התורה) אחי הגר”א, וכן הכרתי את הגאון ר’ יחזקאל לנדא אב”ד דווילנא שכאשר נעשה חתן הביא אותו מחותנו בשבת לפני הגר”א שיברך אותו, והגר”א ז”ל ישב בסעודה שניה של שבת ואכל את הקוגל, והחתן היה מלובש בשטריימיל ורצה הגאון להניח ידיו על ראש החתן לברכו ונסוג החתן לאחוריו שלא ישמין הגאון את השטריימיל בידיו השמנות מהפשטידא, והניח הגר”א ידו אחת על השטריימיל וברכו, והאריך ימים ולמד עד יומו האחרון בלי משקפים, והצטער רבי יחזקאל לנדא כל ימיו, על קטנות המוח שלו שהוקיר את השטריימיל יותר מידיו של הגר”א According to R.
Recommended publications
  • The Fifth Passover Cup and Magical Pairs: Isaac Baer Levinsohn and the Babylonian Talmud
    European Journal of Jewish Studies 15 (2021) 84–103 brill.com/ejjs The Fifth Passover Cup and Magical Pairs: Isaac Baer Levinsohn and the Babylonian Talmud Leor Jacobi Abstract The Fifth Passover Cup is mentioned in a textual variant of a baraita in Tractate Pesaḥim of the Babylonian Talmud (118a), attributed to Rabbi Ṭarfon and another anonymous Palestinian tanna. Scholars have demonstrated that the variant is primary in talmu- dic manuscripts and among the Babylonian Geonim. Following a nineteenth-century proposition of Isaac Baer Levinsohn, it is argued that the fifth cup was instituted in Babylonia due to concern for magical evil spirits aroused by even-numbered events [zugot]. Objections to Levinsohn’s theory can be allayed by critical source analysis: the Talmud’s attribution of the fifth cup to the Palestinian tanna Rabbi Ṭarfon in a baraita is pseudoepigraphic, based upon Rabbi Ṭarfon’s teaching regarding the recitation of Hallel ha-Gadol in Mishnah Ta‘anit 3:9. A special appendix is devoted to Levinsohn’s separate study on zugot in the ancient and medieval world. Keywords Talmud – Passover – magic – Haskalah – source criticism – Halakhah – Levinsohn – magical pairs © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2020 | doi:10.1163/1872471X-bja10020.0102883/ 3..8.31893: The Fifth Passover Cup and Magical Pairs 85 1 Introduction1 If the four Passover cups were created during the six days of creation, then the fifth was conjured up at twilight on the eve of the Sabbath.2 The saga of the mysterious fifth cup stretches from its origins in a phantom talmudic tex- tual variant to its alleged metamorphosis into the ubiquitous “cup of Elijah” to latter-day messianic revival attempts incorporating the visual arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Response-Ability in the Climate Crisis: Going Forth in Honest Teshuva and Active Hope
    1 Rabbi Chai Levy Kol Nidrei 2019 Congregation Netivot Shalom Jewish Response-ability in the Climate Crisis: Going Forth in Honest Teshuva and Active Hope Always a glutton for punishment, this year I decided to forgo the light summer reading, you know, the fun novels and page turners that people usually enjoy while vacationing. Yes, this summer, I dove into the climate change genre1 and read booKs liKe: The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming Needless to say, this wasn’t exactly the Kind of relaxing reading that you do while dozing off on a lounge chair with a pina colada. No, my reading would be accompanied by insomnia, Worrying about the future of life on earth. Anyone else having those nights? The author of The Uninhabitable Earth, David Wallace-Wells observes, and it’s an observation I’ve been sitting with daily (and losing sleep over): “We have not developed much of a religion of meaning around climate change that might comfort us, or give us purpose, in the face of possible annihilation.” We now Know the climate crisis is already here, and we Know we need to change our entire global infrastructures (such as energy, agriculture) to survive. But I want to speak tonight to the issue raised by David Wallace-Wells: What wisdom and purpose does Judaism offer in the climate crisis? Being a Jew is about taking responsibility, for the mitzvot, for our sacred obligations to our community and to our world. “Response-ability”: How are we able to respond when the needs of the world are so massive, so overwhelming, so hard to even fathom? The story of Jewish response-ability begins with the first Jew, Avraham.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ha'amek Davar of Naftali Zevi Yehuda Berlin
    The Ha'amek Davar of Naftali Zevi Yehuda Berlin Asher Charles Oser Department of Jewish Studies McGill University, Montreal January, 2007 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts. © Asher C. Oser 2007 Library and Bibliothèque et 1+1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l'édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-32543-8 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-32543-8 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l'Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans loan, distribute and sell th es es le monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, électronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Copy of Dissertation
    The Talmudic Zohar: Rabbinic Interdisciplinarity in Midrash ha-Ne’lam ​ by Joseph Dov Rosen A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Joint Doctor of Philosophy with Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley in Jewish Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Daniel Boyarin, Chair Professor Deena Aranoff Professor Niklaus Largier Summer 2017 © Joseph Dov Rosen All Rights Reserved, 2017 Abstract The Talmudic Zohar: Rabbinic Interdisciplinarity in Midrash ha-Ne’lam ​ By Joseph Dov Rosen Joint Doctor of Philosophy in Jewish Studies with the Graduate Theological Union University of California, Berkeley Professor Daniel Boyarin, Chair This study uncovers the heretofore ignored prominence of talmudic features in Midrash ​ ​ ha-Ne’lam on Genesis, the earliest stratum of the zoharic corpus. It demonstrates that Midrash ​ ​ ha-Ne’lam, more often thought of as a mystical midrash, incorporates both rhetorical ​ components from the Babylonian Talmud and practices of cognitive creativity from the medieval discipline of talmudic study into its esoteric midrash. By mapping these intersections of Midrash, Talmud, and Esotericism, this dissertation introduces a new framework for studying rabbinic interdisciplinarity—the ways that different rabbinic disciplines impact and transform each other. The first half of this dissertation examines medieval and modern attempts to connect or disconnect the disciplines of talmudic study and Jewish esotericism. Spanning from Maimonides’ reliance on Islamic models of Aristotelian dialectic to conjoin Pardes (Jewish ​ ​ esotericism) and talmudic logic, to Gershom Scholem’s juvenile fascination with the Babylonian Talmud, to contemporary endeavours to remedy the disciplinary schisms generated by Scholem’s founding models of Kabbalah (as a form of Judaism that is in tension with “rabbinic Judaism”), these two chapters tell a series of overlapping histories of Jewish inter/disciplinary projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Forsaken HBI Series on Jewish Women
    Forsaken HBI Series on Jewish Women Shulamit Reinharz, General Editor Sylvia Barack Fishman, Associate Editor Th e HBI Series on Jewish Women, created by the Hadassah-Brandeis Institute, publishes a wide range of books by and about Jewish women in diverse contexts and time periods. Of interest to scholars and the educated public, the HBI Series on Jewish Women fi lls major gaps in Jewish tudiesS and in Women and Gender Studies as well as their intersection. Th e HBI Series on Jewish Women is supported by a generous gift from Dr. Laura S. Schor. For the complete list of books that are available in this series, please see www.upne.com Sharon Faye Koren, Forsaken: Th e Menstruant in Medieval Jewish Mysticism Sonja M. Hedgepeth and Rochelle G. Saidel, editors, Sexual Violence against Jewish Women during the Holocaust Julia R. Lieberman, editor, Sephardi Family Life in the Early Modern Diaspora Derek Rubin, editor, Promised Lands: New Jewish American Fiction on Longing and Belonging Carol K. Ingall, editor, Th e Women Who Reconstructed American Jewish Education: 1910–1965 Gaby Brimmer and Elena Poniatowska, Gaby Brimmer: An Autobiography in Th ree Voices Harriet Hartman and Moshe Hartman, Gender and American Jews: Patt erns in Work, Education, and Family in Contemporary Life Dvora E. Weisberg, Levirate Marriage and the Family in Ancient Judaism Ellen M. Umansky and Dianne Ashton, editors, Four Centuries of Jewish Women’s Spirituality: A Sourcebook Carole S. Kessner, Marie Syrkin: Values Beyond the Self Ruth Kark, Margalit Shilo, and Galit Hasan-Rokem,
    [Show full text]
  • The Navi Journey — Yona
    110 THE NAVI JOURNEY — YONA METZUDOS DAVID, METZUDOS TZION: Commentary on Nevi’im and Kesuvim by R’ Yechiel Hillel Altschuler (18th century C.E.). Metzudos David provides an overall commentary on the text, while Metzudos Tzion focuses on the explanation of words. MIDRASH TANCHUMA: A Midrash on the Chumash based on the teachings of Tanchuma bar Abba (c. late fourteenth century). MISHBETZOS ZAHAV: Commentary on portions of Navi by R’ Shabsi Sheftel Weiss of Jerusalem. MISHNAH BERURAH: Commentary on Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chaim by R’ Yisrael Meir Kagan of Radin (1838–1933). See Chafetz Chaim. MUSSAR HANEVI’IM: Commentary on the Early Prophets written by Rabbi Yehudah Leib Ginsburg (20th century C.E.). His com- mentary focuses on mussar — the moral lessons of the text. He served as rabbi in Denver, Colorado. Also authored Yalkut Yehu- dah on the Torah. OHR HACHAIM: Commentary on the Torah by R’ Chaim ben Moshe Ibn Attar (1696–1743), a prominent rabbi in Morocco. He was a Talmudist and kabbalist. PIRKEI D’RABBI ELIEZER: An Aggadic Midrash composed by the school of the Tanna R’ Eliezer ben Horkanus (c. 100). PNEI YEHOSHUA: Commentary on the Talmud by R’ Yaakov Yeho- shua ben Tzvi Hirsch Falk (1680–1756). The Avnei Tzedek quoted in the name of the Chasam Sofer that “from the time the Chid- dushei HaRashba was printed no sefer was as great as that of the Pnei Yehoshua.” He served as a Rav in a number of cities. RADAK: Acronym for R’ David Kimchi (1160–1235), author of one of the most important commentaries on Tanach.
    [Show full text]
  • The Resurrection Motif in the Midrash on the Akedat Yitzchak1
    The Resurrection Motif in the Midrash on the Akedat Yitzchak1 David Jay Derovan The story of the Akedah,2 the binding and near sacrifice of Yitzchak, is the high point in Avraham's life. The event is described in the Torah in quick short strokes, however, these nineteen sentences give rise to an enormous body of Midrash.3 Much of this Midrash is very perplexing; the content is very strange, the associations are inexplicable and the message is sometimes unintelligible. Midrash is a genre of Rabbinic literature which is spread throughout the Talmud and collected in numerous anthologies. As a result, many of the same comments or stories, Aggadot,4 are repeated in many places, in different books of Midrash or in more than one tractate of Talmud. Therefore, when dealing with Midrash, it often makes sense to speak of a motif. A motif is a single plot line or a specific logical argument consisting of a number of basic elements which appears a number of times.5 In general, the expression of the motif is not always the same, and as a result we find variants on a standard theme. It is often the differences between the variants which say more than the similarities. Of all the motifs in the Midrash on the Akedah, the most puzzling is the resurrection motif. Even a cursory reading of the Akedah story reveals that God did not allow Avraham to harm Yitzchak at all. In fact, the reader is informed from the very beginning that the divine command to sacrifice Yitzchak is only a test: "It was after those things, that the Elohim tested Avraham."6 Even though Yitzchak is not mentioned explicitly in the last verse, it is obvious that he is still alive.
    [Show full text]
  • Jews and Judaism in the Rabbinic Era
    Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism Edited by Maren Niehoff (Jerusalem) Annette Y. Reed (Philadelphia, PA) Seth Schwartz (New York, NY) Moulie Vidas (Princeton, NJ) 173 Isaiah M. Gafni Jews and Judaism in the Rabbinic Era Image and Reality – History and Historiography Mohr Siebeck Isaiah M. Gafni, born 1944; BA, MA, and PhD from the Hebrew University; 1967–2012 taught Jewish History of the Second Temple and Talmudic Periods (500 BCE – 500 CE) at the Hebrew University; currently Professor Emeritus in Jewish History at the Hebrew University, and President of Shalem College, Jerusalem. ISBN 978-3-16-152731-9 / eISBN 978-3-16-156701-8 DOI 10.1628/978-3-16-156701-8 ISSN 0721-8753 / eISSN 2568-9525 (Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism) The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data are available at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2019 Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, Germany. www.mohrsiebeck.com This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher’s written permission. This applies particularly to reproduc- tions, translations and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was printed on non-aging paper by Gulde Druck in Tübingen, and bound by Groß- buchbinderei Spinner in Ottersweier. Printed in Germany. For Naomi Table of Contents Abbreviations.............................................................................................. IX I Introduction .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • With Letters of Light: Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls, Early Jewish
    With Letters of Light rwa lç twytwab Ekstasis Religious Experience from Antiquity to the Middle Ages General Editor John R. Levison Editorial Board David Aune · Jan Bremmer · John Collins · Dyan Elliott Amy Hollywood · Sarah Iles Johnston · Gabor Klaniczay Paulo Nogueira · Christopher Rowland · Elliot R. Wolfson Volume 2 De Gruyter With Letters of Light rwa lç twytwab Studies in the Dead Sea Scrolls, Early Jewish Apocalypticism, Magic, and Mysticism in Honor of Rachel Elior rwayla ljr Edited by Daphna V. Arbel and Andrei A. Orlov De Gruyter ISBN 978-3-11-022201-2 e-ISBN 978-3-11-022202-9 ISSN 1865-8792 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data With letters of light : studies in the Dead Sea scrolls, early Jewish apocalypti- cism, magic and mysticism / Andrei A. Orlov, Daphna V. Arbel. p. cm. - (Ekstasis, religious experience from antiquity to the Middle Ages;v.2) Includes bibliographical references and index. Summary: “This volume offers valuable insights into a wide range of scho- larly achievements in the study of the Dead Sea Scrolls, Jewish apocalypti- cism, magic, and mysticism from the Second Temple period to the later rabbinic and Hekhalot developments. The majority of articles included in the volume deal with Jewish and Christian apocalyptic and mystical texts constituting the core of experiential dimension of these religious traditions” - ECIP summary. ISBN 978-3-11-022201-2 (hardcover 23 x 15,5 : alk. paper) 1. Dead Sea scrolls. 2. Apocalyptic literature - History and criticism. 3. Jewish magic. 4. Mysticism - Judaism. 5. Messianism. 6. Bible. O.T. - Criticism, interpretation, etc. 7. Rabbinical literature - History and criticism.
    [Show full text]
  • Menstruation in Jewish Life and Law Wasserfall: Women and Water Page Iii
    Wasserfall: Women and Water page i Women and Water Wasserfall: Women and Water page ii BRANDEIS SERIES ON JEWISH WOMEN Shulamit Reinharz, General Editor Joyce Antler, Associate Editor Sylvia Barack Fishman, Associate Editor Susan Kahn, Associate Editor The Hadassah Research Institute on Jewish Women, established at Brandeis Uni- versity in 1997 by Hadassah, the Women’s Zionist Organization of America, Inc., supports interdisciplinary basic and applied research as well as cultural projects re- lated to Jewish women around the world. Under the auspices of the Institute, the Brandeis series on Jewish Women publishes a wide range of books by and about Jewish women in diverse contexts and time periods. Marjorie Agosín, Uncertain Travelers: Conversations with Jewish Women Immigrants to America Rahel R. Wasserfall, ed., Women and Water: Menstruation in Jewish Life and Law Wasserfall: Women and Water page iii Women and WateR Menstruation in Jewish Life and Law Edited by Rahel R. Wasserfall Brandeis University Press Published by University Press of New England Hanover and London Wasserfall: Women and Water page iv Brandeis University Press Published by University Press of New England, Hanover, NH 03755 © 1999 by Brandeis University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 54321 cip data appear at the end of the book Illustrations are from Rabbi David Miller, The Secret of the Jew: His Life— His Family, © 1930 by Rabbi David Miller and published by the author. This book was published with the help of the Lucius N. Littauer Foundation, Inc. Wasserfall: Women and Water page v Contents Acknowledgments vii rahel wasserfall Introduction: Menstrual Blood into Jewish Blood 1 I.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beast Between Us the Construction of Identity and Alterity Through Animal Symbolism in Late Antique Jewish and Christian Tradition
    DOI number: DOI - 10.14754/CEU.2017.11 Doctoral Dissertation The Beast between Us The Construction of Identity and Alterity through Animal Symbolism in Late Antique Jewish and Christian Tradition By: Andor Kelenhegyi Supervisor(s): Carsten L. Wilke Submitted to the Medieval Studies Department, and the Doctoral School of History Central European University, Budapest in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Medieval Studies, and for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2017 Table of contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................. 5 I. Introduction....................................................................................................................................... 7 I.I. Animal symbolism and the study of Jewish-Christian interrelations ......................................... 7 I.I.II. Research questions, sources and methodology ................................................................. 10 I.I.III. State of the art and hypothesis ......................................................................................... 12 I.II. Animal symbolism and human communities .......................................................................... 19 I.II.I. The Darwinian turn ........................................................................................................... 19 I.II.II. Animals describing reality ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • What's Happening @ O.Z. in Our Community…
    IN OUR COMMUNITY… —————————–————–—————–—— THANK YOU Over 60 participants for our Community Lunches … stay tuned for the next one! MAZEL TOV David Debora & Nicole Iglicki, on their aufruf WHAT’S HAPPENING @ O.Z. and upcoming wedding Hindy Poupko & Seth Galena and family, on the birth and bris of their son Dovid Gavriel Friday, May 31, 2019: CONDOLENCES 41st Day Omer (Iyyar 26) Rene & June Slotkin, on the passing of 6:10a Shacharit Rene’s sister Irene Hizme z’l 6:25a Shacharit 7:00a Shacharit SPONSORSHIPS 8:00a Shacharit Delicious Kiddush 6:45p Sephardic Plag Family Minyan & Mazzeh David Debora & Nicole Iglicki, in honor of Meets in Bet Medrash their aufurf and upcoming wedding *Shir HaShirim at 6:30pm Hashkama Kiddush 7:00p *** Early Minyan in Main Shul Dr. Joseph Frager, in memory of his father, 8:02p Candle Lighting Mordechai Avraham ben Rav Shmuel z’l 8:10p Mincha/Maariv in Main Shul Monday Night with Rabbi Schwartz Classes this past week were dedicated in Shabbat, June 1, 2019: honor of Memorial Day and in appreciation to Parshat Bechukotai - Shabbat Mevarchim the sacrifices of the American Armed Forces 42nd Day Omer (Iyyar 27) 7:30a Hashkama Minyan in Bet Medrash UPCOMING EXCITING COURSES Kiddush & Shiur in Social Hall Shabbat Refresher Course 8:30a Parsha Shiur with Rabbi Schwartz Wednesdays, June 5 — July 10, 6:45pm 9:15a Shacharit Join Adam Resnick and review the laws and 10:00a Youth Groups practical applications of Bishul, warming 11:15a Tot Tefillah & Monthly Birthdays! food, preparing, Borer, personal grooming, Delicious
    [Show full text]