DOCSLIB.ORG

D3.1 Baseline Report of Hamburg Demonstrator Area WP3, Task 3.1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
D3.1 Baseline Report of Hamburg Demonstrator Area WP3, Task 3.1 Ref. Ares(2017)5877910 - 30/11/2017 Deliverable due date: M12 – November 2017 (Interim M8) D3.1 Baseline report of Hamburg demonstrator area WP3, Task 3.1 Transition of EU cities towards a new concept of Smart Life and Economy D3.1 Baseline Report of Hamburg demonstrator area Page 2 Project Acronym mySMARTLife Project Title Transition of EU cities towards a new concept of Smart Life and Economy st th Project Duration 1 December 2016 – 30 November 2021 (60 Months) Deliverable D3.1 Baseline report of Hamburg demonstration area Diss. Level PU Working Status Verified by other WPs Final version Due date 30/11/2017 Work Package WP3 Lead beneficiary HAM Contributing KON, ENH, HCU, HAW, CAR beneficiary(ies) This task will set and assess, according to WP5, a baseline for Hamburg demonstration. Analysis of the district in which the interventions will be implemented with information about the main architectural issues, energy facilities and energy consumption, mobility data and urban Task description infrastructures are necessary for the definition of the baseline and for identifying the improvements potential. More details are needed in the case of the existing urban plans, public procurement and the current citizen engagement strategies in Hamburg. Date Version Author Comment 06/07/2017 0.1 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Interim Version 07/07/2017 0.2 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Interim Version (Language corrections) Chapter land use, green and public spaces structure, 11/07/2107 0.3 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) traffic completed 12/07/2017 0.4 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Chapter Environment: air quality, Nature protection Chapter Environment: CO2-emission, waste and water 12/07/2017 0.5 Jutta Wolff (HAM-BGD) Chapter Energy characterisation Chapter Urban plans All remaining chapters updated incl. indicators, 13/07/2017 0.6 Jutta Wolff (HAM-BGD) chapter 4 and 5 checked 13/07/2017 0.7 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Chapter 6, 7 checked. References checked. Johannes Mielchen, Jutta Wolff 13/07/2017 0.8 Language corrections and final reviewing (HAM-BGD) D3.1 Baseline Report of Hamburg demonstrator area Page 3 Correction in Table 4 - Total no. of single households 17/072017 0.9 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) 1994: 45,6% Correction page numbers 25/07/2017 0.10 CARTIF Alignment of contents and final review 0.11 CARTIF Review 18/10/2017 0.12 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Remove of the footer, to reduce the documents Data 18/10/2017 0.13 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Comments and text responsibilities 23/10/2017 0.14 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Part 11, City Transportation 25/10/2017 0.15 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Part 11, Local Bicycle traffic 01/11/2017 0.16 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Part 12, Bergedorf Süd von KON eingefügt 01/11/2017 0.17 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Part 8, translation insert 01/11/2017 0.18 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Part 5, text from HCU insert 02/11/2017 0.19 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Layout Changes 02/11/2017 0.20 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Part 8, table insert, minor corrections 03/11/2017 0.21 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Maps insert 03/11/2017 0.22 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Text from partners insert 06/11/2017 0.23 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Selection of Indicators 06/11/2017 0.24 Jutta Wolff (HAM-BGD) Selection of Indicators, update part on Co2 emissions 07/11/2017 0.25 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Insert of statistical data 07/11/2017 0.26 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) 8.5 Actual Plans Developments 07/11/2017 0.27 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Correctionsfrom HAM-SK 07/11/2017 0.28 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Insert energy text from HAW Insert corrections for section 4-7 (here only few 09/11/2017 0.30 Jutta Wolff (HAM-BGD) comments left), chapter 8 sent to Katharina for corrections All sections are inserted and completed, final 09/11/2017 0.31 Jutta Wolff (HAM-BGD) corrections missing All sections are inserted and completed, final spelling 09/11/2017 0.33 Jutta Wolff (HAM-BGD) and orthographic mistakes are corrected 09/11/2017 0.34 Jutta Wolff (HAM-BGD) Submitted version on 9.11.2017 16/11/2017 0.35 Cartif review 28/11/2017 0.36 Jutta Wolff (HAM-BGD) Correction of indicators 29/11/2017 0.37 Johannes Mielchen (HAM-BGD) Submitted Version 30/11/2017 0.38 CARTIF Review D3.1 Baseline Report of Hamburg demonstrator area Page 4 Copyright notices ©2017 mySMARTLIfe Consortium Partners. All rights reserved. mySMARTLife is a HORIZON2020 Project supported by the European Commission under contract No.731297. For more information on the project, its partners and contributors, please see the mySMARTLife website (www.mysmartlife.eu). You are permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, containing this copyright notice, but modifying this document is not allowed. All contents are reserved by default and may not be disclosed to third parties without the written consent of the mySMARTLife partners, except as mandated by the European Commission contract, for reviewing and dissemination purposes. All trademarks and other rights on third party products mentioned in this document are acknowledged and owned by the respective holders. The information contained in this document represents the views of mySMARTLife members as of the date they are published. The mySMARTLife consortium does not guarantee that any information contained herein is error-free, or up-to-date, nor makes warranties, express, implied, or statutory, by publishing this document. D3.1 Baseline Report of Hamburg demonstrator area Page 5 Table of Content 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 15 2. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 17 2.1 Purpose and target group ............................................................................................................................ 17 2.2 Contributions of partners ............................................................................................................................. 19 2.3 Relation to other activities in the project ..................................................................................................... 19 PART I: Hamburg city audit ........................................................................................................................................ 20 3. City audit overview .............................................................................................................................................. 20 3.1 City characterisation .................................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 Predefinition of the Evaluation Framework ................................................................................................. 20 4. City characterisation ............................................................................................................................................ 22 4.1 General overview and geographic positioning ............................................................................................ 22 4.2 Socioeconomic characterisation.................................................................................................................. 23 4.2.1 A growing multicultural city ..................................................................................................................... 23 4.2.2 Economic context and employment in Hamburg .................................................................................... 25 4.3 Climatic characterisation ............................................................................................................................. 26 4.4 Urban morphology and land use characterisation ....................................................................................... 27 4.4.1 Urban morphology .................................................................................................................................. 28 4.4.2 Green and public spaces structure characterisation .............................................................................. 29 4.4.3 Traffic characterisation ............................................................................................................................ 31 4.5 Energy characterisation ............................................................................................................................... 34 4.5.1 Energy characterisation of Germany ...................................................................................................... 34 4.5.2 Energy characterisation of Hamburg ...................................................................................................... 37 4.6 Environmental characterisation ................................................................................................................... 41 4.6.1 Air Quality................................................................................................................................................ 41 4.6.2 Noise ....................................................................................................................................................... 43 4.6.3 Nature and protection areas ................................................................................................................... 45 4.6.4 CO2-emissions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Macht Und Pracht 8.–10. September 2017
    Seit über 100 Jahren Immobilienkompetenz in der Verwaltung und Vermittlung von Zinshäusern, Wohnanlagen und Geschäftshäusern. Seit 1939 befindet sich der Sitz am Jungfernstieg 34, dem denkmalgeschützten Heine-Haus. Unser Firmensitz im Heine-Haus MACHT UND PRACHT 8.–10. SEPTEMBER 2017 Immobilienmakler und Grundstücksverwaltungen seit 1913 Jungfernstieg 34 • 20354 Hamburg www.richardgrossmann.de Ihre Ansprechpartner: Herr Berge: 040/35 75 88-17 • Herr Lux: 040/35 75 88-61 IVD VHH EEK Aktuelles Programm, Programmänderungen Inhalt und Nachmeldungen: www.denkmalstiftung.de/denkmaltag Zum Geleit 7 Vorwort 8 Alle Veranstaltungen sind kostenlos. In einigen Fällen sind jedoch Stiftung Denkmalpflege Hamburg 9 rechtzeitige Voranmeldungen notwendig. Hinweis: Alle Führungen und Besichtigungen inkl. des Rahmen- Denkmalschutzamt Hamburg 10 programms finden in der Verantwortung der jeweiligen Veran- Auftaktveranstaltung am 8.09.2017 11 stalter statt. Denkmalschutzamt und Stiftung Denkmalpflege Hamburg übernehmen die Koordination und die Redaktion des Baukultur 2017 12 Programmhefts. Die Kontaktdaten der Veranstalter finden Sie unter www.denkmalstiftung.de/denkmaltag. Familienprogramm 15 Führungen und Besichtigungen: Die Deutsche Stiftung Denkmalschutz koordiniert den Tag des offenen Denkmals bundesweit und gibt eine kostenfreie ALTONA Denkmaltag-App für Android und iPhone heraus. ALTONA-ALTSTADT Köhlbrandtreppe 19 Hauptkirche St. Trinitatis Altona 19 Bundesweites Programm: www.tag-des-offenen-denkmals.de/programm Stuhlmannbrunnen 20 Museum für textile
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 9. Two Germanies, 1961-1989 Origins, Motives, and Structures of Citizens' Initiatives (October 27, 1973)
    Volume 9. Two Germanies, 1961-1989 Origins, Motives, and Structures of Citizens' Initiatives (October 27, 1973) When local politicians started making controversial decisions that harmed citizens’ quality of life – like building super-highways through residential neighborhoods – citizens began to form single-issue protest movements in the hopes of forcing politicians to abandon misguided urban development projects. The Citizens Strike Back. Participation or: The only Alternative? Citizens’ Initiatives and the Hamburg Example “The citizens triumphed over the authorities” was the headline of a morning paper in Hamburg this summer. It was about an inner-city highway, a so-called feeder road to the prospective western freeway bypass around Hamburg, which also includes the new tunnel under the Elbe. The route for a connection with the urban road network would had to have been cut through the densely built-up residential area of Ottensen. There had been protests for a long time. Resistance to the intentions of local politicians was ultimately modeled on other citizens’ initiatives. In the end, the success of this local protest movement was not limited to the planned route alignment and not even to urban traffic planning in general. The feeder will not be built as planned. There is still no substitute for it – although the western freeway bypass is already far along. Nevertheless, this is not merely a matter of the authorities capitulating. Ottensen, a district built in the early twentieth century, with narrow streets, mostly poor building materials, and a relatively large amount of industry, is an urban redevelopment area. In addition to not building the feeder road, the building authority approved the appointment of a redevelopment commissioner, corresponding to the wishes of the relevant district assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany FRACIT Report Online Version
    EUDO CITIZENSHIP OBSERVATORY ACCESS TO ELECTORAL RIGHTS GERMANY Luicy Pedroza June 2013 CITIZENSHIP http://eudo-citizenship.eu European University Institute, Florence Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies EUDO Citizenship Observatory Access to Electoral Rights Germany Luicy Pedroza June 2013 EUDO Citizenship Observatory Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Access to Electoral Rights Report, RSCAS/EUDO-CIT-ER 2013/13 Badia Fiesolana, San Domenico di Fiesole (FI), Italy © Luicy Pedroza This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the authors. Requests should be addressed to [email protected] The views expressed in this publication cannot in any circumstances be regarded as the official position of the European Union Published in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/ www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Research for the EUDO Citizenship Observatory Country Reports has been jointly supported, at various times, by the European Commission grant agreements JLS/2007/IP/CA/009 EUCITAC and HOME/2010/EIFX/CA/1774 ACIT, by the European Parliament and by the British Academy Research Project CITMODES (both projects co-directed by the EUI and the University of Edinburgh). The financial support from these projects is gratefully acknowledged. For information about the project please visit the project website at http://eudo-citizenship.eu Access to Electoral Rights Germany Luicy Pedroza 1. Introduction Presently, in Germany, only resident German citizens have the franchise in elections at all levels. EU citizens have and can exercise electoral rights on roughly equivalent conditions to German citizens in municipal and European Parliament elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistisches Jahrbuch Hamburg 2015/2016 241 17 Gebiet Und Geografische Angaben
    17 Gebiet und geografische Angaben Statistikamt Nord Statistisches Jahrbuch Hamburg 2015/2016 241 17 Gebiet und geografische Angaben Bodenflächen nach Art der tatsächlichen Nutzung chen zählen Vor- und Hausgärten, Spiel- und Stell- plätze und andere Flächen; es sei denn, dass diese Die Erhebung der Bodenflächen nach Art der tatsäch- wegen eigenständiger Verwendung nach ihrer tat- lichen Nutzung erfolgt unter Zugrundelegung der An- sächlichen Nutzung auszuweisen sind. gaben des Liegenschaftskatasters und ist eine Be- standsaufnahme der zum Stichtag vorliegenden Ver- hältnisse der Bodennutzung. Die Flächen werden Landwirtschaftsfläche nach der Belegenheit ausgewiesen, d. h. sie spiegeln die tatsächliche Lage der Flächen wider (Belegen- Unbebaute Flächen, die dem Ackerbau, der Wiesen- heitsprinzip). und Weidewirtschaft, dem Gartenbau, dem Obstbau oder den Baumschulen dienen. Einbezogen werden neben dem Ackerland, Grünland und Gartenland auch Betriebsfläche Moor, Heide, Brachland sowie unbebaute Flächen (landwirtschaftliche Betriebsflächen), die vorherr- Unbebaute Flächen (einschließlich Abbauland), die schend dem landwirtschaftlichen Betrieb dienen. gewerblich, industriell oder für Zwecke der Ver- und Nicht hierzu gehören Parks. Entsorgung genutzt werden. Verkehrsfläche Erholungsfläche Unbebaute Landflächen, die dem Straßen-, Schie- Unbebaute Flächen, die vorherrschend dem Sport nen- oder Luftverkehr sowie Landflächen, die dem und der Erholung dienen. Verkehr auf den Wasserstraßen dienen. Flächen anderer Nutzung Waldfläche Unbebaute Flächen,
    [Show full text]
  • A Pathological Normalcy? a Study of Right-Wing Populist Parties in Germany
    Right-Wing Populist Parties – A Pathological Normalcy? A Study of Right-Wing Populist Parties in Germany ABSTRACT This chapter challenges the common explanation for the success or failure of right-wing populism, conducting a theory-testing analysis. Right-wing populist parties are often viewed as a temporary phenomenon, caused by some form of a crisis that weakened society. Cas Mudde offered an alternative explanation, claiming that the core sentiments of right-wing populism are rooted in society. Three concepts – authoritarianism, nativism and populism – are assumed to form the basis of right-wing populism. Examining party programmes, public statements and secondary literature on the German parties Die Republikaner, Schill-Partei and Alternative für Deutschland, this chapter identifies to what extent the three notions are reflected in the parties’ ideologies. Next, the chapter looks at public opinion surveys in order to detect those sentiments within the German society. The analysis reveals that the three notions are not only part of the parties’ ideologies, but are also consistently present in the German public opinion. The findings furthermore indicate that the success or failure of right-wing populist parties depends on their ability to deal with organisational struggles, to broaden their agenda and to provide a charismatic leader. As a consequence, this study of right-wing populism shows that explaining the surge of such parties based on the occurrence of crisis might be a convenient argument by those who neglect that the problem goes deeper. Anne Christin Hausknecht1 1 Anne Christin Hausknecht received a bachelor degree in European Studies at Maastricht University. She is currently enrolled for a Master in International Human Rights Law and International Criminal Law at Bangor University.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics and Culture of FC St. Pauli
    This article was downloaded by: [University College Dublin] On: 29 April 2013, At: 11:46 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Soccer & Society Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fsas20 The Politics and Culture of FC St. Pauli: from leftism, through anti- establishment, to commercialization Petra Daniel a & Christos Kassimeris a a European University Cyprus, Egkomi, Cyprus Published online: 25 Mar 2013. To cite this article: Petra Daniel & Christos Kassimeris (2013): The Politics and Culture of FC St. Pauli: from leftism, through anti-establishment, to commercialization, Soccer & Society, DOI:10.1080/14660970.2013.776466 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2013.776466 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and- conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hamburg Rathaus Seat of the Hamburg State Parliament and the Hamburg State Administration
    Hun bixêr hatin Mirë se erdhët Te aven Baxtale Welcome Bienvenue Willkommen THE HAMBURG RATHAUS SEAT OF THE HAMBURG STATE PARLIAMENT AND THE HAMBURG STATE ADMINISTRATION Kalender Englisch Umschlag U1-U4.indd 1 06.06.17 20:56 The Hamburg Rathaus Kalender Englisch Umschlag U1-U4.indd 2 06.06.17 20:57 The Hamburg Rathaus Seat of the state parliament and state administration Welcome to Hamburg! We hope that you will Hygieia and the dragon symbolize the conque- state parliament and the Hamburg state ad- settle in well and that Hamburg will become ring of the Hamburg cholera epidemic of 1892. minstration. your second home. With this brochure, we’d In Hamburg, the state parliament is called the like to introduce you to the Hamburg Rathaus, Bürgerschaft and the state administration is the city hall. It is the seat of Hamburg’s state called the Senat. parliament and administration. Perhaps it It is at the Rathaus where issues important is comparable to similar buildings in your to you are debated and resolutions made – countries, in which the state administration housing and health issues, education issues, or state parliament have their seats. and economic issues, for example. The Rathaus is in the middle of the city, and Please take the time to accompany us through was built more than 100 years ago, between the Hamburg Rathaus on the following pages, 1884 and 1897. With its richly decorated and learn about the work and the responsibili- commons.wikimedia.org/Brüning (gr.); Rademacher Jens Photos: façade, its width of 111 meters, its 112-meter ties of the Senat and the Bürgerschaft.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    introDUCTION During Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach’s tenure almost 40 pastors were elected and installed in their new positions in Hamburg. This large number results from two historic facts: the five Hamburg main churches—St. Petri, St. Nicolai, St. Catharinen, St. Jacobi, and St. Michaelis—employed not only a main pastor, but up to four deacons; and the Ministerium, the highest board of the Ham- burg clergy, was responsible for a large number of additional congregations in and outside the walls of the city.1 These included the churches of St. Johannis, St. Maria Magdalena, Heilig-Geist (Holy Spirit), Heilige Dreieinigkeitskirche (Holy Trinity), St. Pauli auf dem Hamburgerberge; the churches associated with St. Hiob Hospital, the Waisenhaus (orphanage), the Zuchthaus (correc- tional institute), the Pesthof, the Spinnhaus-Kirche; and, as a relic of the Han- seatic League, the guard ship on the Elbe River. Furthermore the churches in Eppendorf, Hamm und Horn, Billwerder an der Bille, Moorfleet, Allermöhe, Ochsenwerder, Moorburg, Ritzebüttel, Groden, Döse, and Altenwalde were in Hamburg territory (though up to 80 miles away from the city), whereas the churches in Bergedorf, Altengamme, Neuengamme, Kirchwerder, Curslack, and Geesthacht were overseen jointly by the Hamburg and Lübeck clergy.2 Fi- nally, some German congregations abroad recruited pastors from Hamburg, most notably London and Arkhangelsk (on the Russian coast of the White Sea).3 1. The single most important source is Janssen. See also Jensen, Bruhn, and Enßlin/Wolf 2007. 2. The following congregations were supervised by the HamburgMinisterium , although no new pastors were installed there between 1768 and 1788: Maria Magdalena (within the city walls), Eppendorf, Hamm und Horn, Bergedorf, and Neuengamme.
    [Show full text]
  • Bowler, Mcelroy and Müller Electoral Studies 2017 Old
    Voter preferences and party loyalty under cumulative voting: political behaviour after electoral reform in Bremen and Hamburg Shaun Bowlera,*, Gail McElroy b, Stefan Müllerb Accepted for publication in Electoral Studies a Department of Political Science, University of California, Riverside, USA b Department of Political Science, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland * Corresponding author. Department of Political Science, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Bowler) Abstract Many electoral systems constrain voters to one or two votes at election time. Reformers often see this as a failing because voters’ preferences are both broader and more varied than the number of choices allowed. New electoral systems therefore often permit more preferences to be expressed. In this paper we examine what happens when cumulative voting is introduced in two German states. Even when we allow for tactical considerations, we find that the principle of unconstrained choice is not widely embraced by voters, although in practice, too, many seem to have preferences for more than just one party. This finding has implications for arguments relating to electoral reform as well as how to conceive of party affiliations in multi-party systems. Keywords: electoral reform; cumulative voting; propensity to vote; Germany; state elections Acknowledgements: We thank Volker Best, Michael Jankowski, Tom Louwerse, the editor, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions. A previous version of the paper was presented at the annual general conference of the European Political Science Association Conference in Milan, 22–24 June 2017. 1 1. Introduction What happens when voters are given the opportunity to express numerous preferences? Many electoral systems allow voters only a limited amount of choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamburg Hamburg Presents
    International Police Association InternationalP oliceA ssociation RegionRegionIPA Hamburg Hamburg presents: HamburgHamburg -- a a short short break break Tabel of contents 1. General Information ................................................................1 2. Hamburg history in brief..........................................................2 3. The rivers of Hamburg ............................................................8 4. Attractions ...............................................................................9 4.1 The port.................................................................................9 4.2 The Airport (Hamburg Airport .............................................10 4.3 Finkenwerder / Airbus Airport..............................................10 4.4 The Town Hall .....................................................................10 4.5 The stock exchange............................................................10 4.6 The TV Tower / Heinrich Hertz Tower..................................11 4.7 The St. Pauli Landungsbrücken with the (old) Elbtunnel.....11 4.8 The Congress Center Hamburg (CCH)...............................11 4.9 HafenCity and Speicherstadt ..............................................12 4.10 The Elbphilharmonie .........................................................12 4.11 The miniature wonderland.................................................12 4.12 The planetarium ................................................................13 5. The main churches of Hamburg............................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Statistisches Amt Für Hamburg Und Schleswig-Holstein Statistik Informiert
    Statistisches Amt für Hamburg und Schleswig-Holstein Statistik informiert ... 10. August 2010 V/2010 Bevölkerung mit Migrationshintergrund in den Hamburger Stadtteilen Zum ersten Mal hat das Statistikamt Nord eine Sonderauswertung aus dem Melderegister zur Bevölkerung mit Migrationserfahrung oder Migrationshin- tergrund nach Stadtteilen durchgeführt. In Hamburg lebten demnach Ende 2009 insgesamt rund 487 000 Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund, das sind 28 Prozent aller Einwohnerinnen und Einwohner. Rund 231 000 von ihnen haben nicht die deutsche Staatsangehörigkeit, 139 000 sind einge- bürgert und 76 000 Aussiedler. Hinzu kommen 42 000 Kinder und Jugendli- che, die keine eigene Migrationserfahrung haben und die die deutsche Staatsangehörigkeit besitzen, denen aber durch einen oder beide Elternteile ein Migrationshintergrund zugeordnet wird. Im Vergleich der Bezirke gibt es den größten Anteil von Personen mit Migra- tionshintergrund in Hamburg-Mitte – fast 43 Prozent. Im Bezirk Hamburg- Nord sind es hingegen nur gut 22 Prozent. Doch auch innerhalb der Bezirke gibt es große Unterschiede zwischen den Stadtteilen. Die Anteile an der je- weiligen Gesamtbevölkerung sind in der beigefügten Tabelle 2 dargestellt. Billstedt, Wilhelmsburg und Rahlstedt sind die Stadtteile mit den (absolut) meisten Personen mit Migrationshintergrund. Die höchsten Anteile an der Bevölkerung im Stadtteil finden sich auf der Veddel und in Billbrook mit mehr als zwei Dritteln. Vergleichsweise wenige Personen mit Migrations- hintergrund leben dagegen in den Stadtteilen der Vier- und Marschlande (mit Ausnahme von Allermöhe), in denen sie deutlich unter zehn Prozent der Bevölkerung ausmachen. Der Anteil der Personen mit Migrationshintergrund an der Bevölkerung ist in den jüngeren Altersgruppen deutlich höher als in den älteren. Nur etwa zwölf Prozent der Hamburgerinnen und Hamburger über 65 Jahre haben einen Migrationshintergrund, aber fast 43 Prozent der unter 15-jährigen.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeologische Gebietseinheit 2 [Hg 2]: Vier- Und Marschlande
    Anpassung der Fahrrinne von Unter- und Außenelbe Schutzgut Wasser / Grundwasser (Anhang II) Planfeststellungsunterlage H.2c BWS GmbH HYDROGEOLOGISCHE GEBIETSEINHEIT 2 [HG 2]: VIER- UND MARSCHLANDE Lage und Begrenzung: Die hydrogeologische Gebietseinheit 2, Vier- und Marschlande (202 km 2 Fläche), befindet sich auf der nördlichen Elbseite im östlichen Stadtgebiet Hamburgs. Es han- delt sich um ein bis zu 13 km breites Marschgebiet. Die vorherrschenden Nutzungen sind Industrie und Gewerbe (im Westen), Ackerbau und Grünland (im Osten), Sied- lung sowie Trink- und Brauchwassergewinnung. Die hydrogeologische Gebietseinheit 2 grenzt im Norden an den Geestrand, im Nordwesten an die Binnenalster und im Südwesten und Südosten an die Elbe. Sie wird von den Gewässern Bille, Dove-Elbe und Gose-Elbe durchflossen. Hydrogeologie: In der hydrogeologischen Gebietseinheit 2 befinden sich bis ca. 6 m mächtige Weich- schichten (s. Abb. II-hG2-1 und II-hG2-2), im Bereich von Fehlstellen der Weich- schichten Sand und Geschiebemergel. Dies ist vor allem in den nördlichen Randbe- reichen der Fall. Im Hafengebiet können die Weichschichten aufgrund anthropogener Bodenveränderungen bereichsweise entfernt oder in ihrer Mächtigkeit reduziert sein. Im Hafengebiet sind sie größtenteils durch Aufschüttungen überlagert. Unterhalb der Weichschichten befinden sich 15 - 25 m mächtige Sande und Kiese des oberen, quartären Grundwasserleiters. Darunter befinden sich Geschiebemergel und Glimmer- ton mit Fehlstellen im Bereich von eiszeitlichen Rinnen bzw. in Hochlagen des Ter- tiärs. Im Bereich solcher Fehlstellen ist ein hydraulischer Kontakt zu tieferen Grund- wasserleitern möglich. Im Untergrund befinden sich die Salzstöcke Geesthacht und Hohenhorn. Seite 1/1= Anpassung der Fahrrinne von Unter- und Außenelbe Schutzgut Wasser / Grundwasser (Anhang II) Planfeststellungsunterlage H.2c BWS GmbH Grundwasseranschluss und Tidebeeinflussung der Oberflächengewässer: Die Elbsohle verläuft innerhalb von Sand und Kies (oberer, quartärer Grundwasserlei- ter), es besteht Grundwasseranschluss.
    [Show full text]