EG39CH16-Newell ARI 27 September 2014 14:17 The Psychology of Environmental Decisions Ben R. Newell,1 Rachel I. McDonald,1,2 Marilynn Brewer,1 and Brett K. Hayes1 1School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia; email:
[email protected] 2Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045 Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2014. 39:443–67 Keywords The Annual Review of Environment and Resources is decision making, environment, framing, mental model, psychological online at environ.annualreviews.org distance, social norms, social dilemma, worldview This article’s doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-010713-094623 Abstract Copyright c 2014 by Annual Reviews. Humanity faces an unprecedented set of global environmental problems. We All rights reserved argue that to promote pro-environmental decisions and to achieve public consensus on the need for action we must address individual and collective Access provided by University of New South Wales on 11/26/14. For personal use only. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resourc. 2014.39:443-467. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org understanding (cognition) of environmental problems, as well as individ- ual and collective commitments to take action to mitigate or prevent those problems. We review literature pertaining to psychological predispositions, mental models, framing, psychological distance, and the social context of decisions that help elucidate how these goals of cognition and commitment can be achieved. This article reveals the complex and multiply determined nature of environmental decisions. However, we argue that this complex- ity points to opportunities to reduce the inherent uncertainty surrounding global environmental challenges via appeals to the psychological mechanisms that underpin our decisions.