BC Law Magazine Winter 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
New England Law Boston: Updated 9-18 Institutions Wishing to Use Off
Application: New England Law Boston: Updated 9-18 Institutions wishing to use off-campus spaces for de-densification purposes should submit a 2-3 page document with the following sections and addressing the topics listed in each section below. Applications must be submitted to Nupoor Monani ( [email protected]) and will be accepted starting Monday, July 13th, 2020. Overall de-densification and isolation and quarantine strategy A narrative stating how off-campus occupancy helps the institution meet social distancing standards set forth by City/State/Federal public health guidance, and plans to isolate and quarantine members of the school community as necessary. New England Law | Boston has developed a Return to Campus Plan (see attached) designed to bring our community back to campus safely, in accordance with best practices and evolving government guidelines, while also preserving the educational quality of the law school experience. Essential to this Plan is the de-densifying of our main campus building at 154 Stuart Street, which we are operating at less than 25 % capacity. To accomplish this goal, the Law School sought out and rented, on a short-term basis, auxiliary classroom space in the Revere Hotel’s 6,400 square foot main ballroom. This space is adjacent to the Law School, has a dedicated point of access, and a regular capacity of 950 (per Boston Inspectional Services Occupancy Certificate), which will be used at less than 6% capacity. This space is dedicated exclusively as a classroom for the 258 students (split into five groups) in the incoming class who elected in-person learning. -
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 Application of Comcast Corporation, General Electric Company
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 Application of Comcast Corporation, ) General Electric Company and NBC ) Universal, Inc., for Consent to Assign ) MB Docket No. 10-56 Licenses or Transfer Control of ) Licenses ) COMMENTS AND MERGER CONDITIONS PROPOSED BY ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNICATIONS DEMOCRACY James N. Horwood Gloria Tristani Spiegel & McDiarmid LLP 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 879-4000 June 21, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PEG PROGRAMMING IS ESSENTIAL TO PRESERVING LOCALISM AND DIVERSITY ON BEHALF OF THE COMMUNITY, IS VALUED BY VIEWERS, AND MERITS PROTECTION IN COMMISSION ACTION ON THE COMCAST-NBCU TRANSACTION .2 II. COMCAST CONCEDES THE RELEVANCE OF AND NEED FOR IMPOSING PEG-RELATED CONDITIONS ON THE TRANSFER, BUT THE PEG COMMITMENTS COMCAST PROPOSES ARE INADEQUATE 5 A. PEG Merger Condition No.1: As a condition ofthe Comcast NBCU merger, Comcast should be required to make all PEG channels on all ofits cable systems universally available on the basic service tier, in the same format as local broadcast channels, unless the local government specifically agrees otherwise 8 B. PEG Merger Condition No.2: As a merger condition, the Commission should protect PEG channel positions .,.,.,.. ., 10 C. PEG Merger Condition No.3: As a merger condition, the Commission should prohibit discrimination against PEG channels, and ensure that PEG channels will have the same features and functionality, and the same signal quality, as that provided to local broadcast channels .,., ., ..,.,.,.,..,., ., ., .. .,11 D. PEG Merger Condition No.4: As a merger condition, the Commission should require that PEG-related conditions apply to public access, and that all PEG programming is easily accessed on menus and easily and non-discriminatorily accessible on all Comcast platforms ., 12 CONCLUSION 13 EXHIBIT 1 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. -
Reciprocal Access List As of January 2020 Albany Law School Schaffer
Reciprocal Access List as of January 2020 Albany Law School Schaffer Law Library Getty Research Institute American University in Cairo Graduate Center, CUNY Art Institute of Chicago Hagley Museum and Library Bard Graduate Center Harvard Law School Library Binghamton University Haverford College Boston College Hebrew Union College - NY Boston College Law Library Hebrew Union College - OH Boston University Hebrew Union College -CA Boston University Fineman and Pappas Law Institute for Advanced Study Library Library of Congress Brandeis University Massachusetts Trial Court Law Libraries Brigham Young University Metropolitan Museum of Art Brigham Young University Law Library Montana State University Brown University Museum of Fine Arts, Houston Bryn Mawr College National Gallery of Art Carnegie Mellon University Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art Clark Art Institute New England Law Boston Cleveland Museum of Art New School Libraries Columbia University-Butler Northeastern School of Law Library Columbia University-Law Library Northeastern University Columbia University-Teachers College Northwestern University Connecticut Judicial Branch Library System Ohio State University, The Cooper Union Library Ohio State University-Health Sciences Library Cornell Law Library Pennsylvania State University Cornell University Library Princeton University Cornell University Weill Medical Library Quinnipiac University School of Law Library Emory University Rhode Island State Law Library Fordham University Law Library Roger Williams University School of Law Frick -
Transpo Transcript.Indd
October 2013 Using Technology to Improve Transportation: All Electronic-Tolling and Beyond Transcript Introduction customer-facing and most customer- Underinvestment has put pressure on focused of all government services. STEVE POFTAK: Thanks to all of transportation providers to improve service. Trust in government is another aspect Fiscal pressures have limited the resources you for coming today and joining us. available to make those improvements. of transportation. And technology is a I’d also like to thank our partners who Technology off ers the opportunity to way for us to show our customers that leverage smaller investments by improving have put this together: Joseph Giglio customer services, enhancing operating we can improve their experience. from the Center for Strategic Studies effi ciencies, and increasing revenue. at the D’Amore-McKim School of I think the gold standard in our To explore the potential of new technologies to make transportation Business at Northeastern University business is giving more time back work more effi ciently, faster, and safer, the and Greg Massing at the Rappaport to people. Whether it’s standing on conference “Using Technology to Improve Transportation: All-Electronic Tolling and Center for Law and Public Service at a platform at Alewife or standing in Beyond” was held on May 7, 2013 at the Suffolk University. line at the Registry of Motor Vehicles, Suff olk University Law School. it is giving people more time back. Here in Massachusetts, we’ve just The Conference was co-sponsored by The Technology holds tremendous promise Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston, The gone through another round of Center for Strategic Studies at the D’Amore- to accomplish these goals that we have legislative and executive branch McKim School of Business at Northeastern in transportation. -
Student Housing Trends 2017-2018 Academic Year
Student Housing Trends 2017-2018 Academic Year Boston’s world-renowned colleges and universities provide our City and region with unparalleled cultural resources, a thriving economic engine, and a talented workforce at the forefront of global innovation. However, the more than 147,000 students enrolled in Boston-based undergraduate and graduate degree programs place enormous strain on the city’s residential housing market, contributing to higher rents and housing costs for Boston’s workforce. In Housing a Changing City: Boston 2030, the Walsh Administration outlined three clear strategic goals regarding student housing: 1. Create 18,500 new student dormitory beds by the end of 2030;1 2. Reduce the number of undergraduates living off-campus in Boston by 50%;2 3. Ensure all students reside in safe and suitable housing. The annual student housing report provides the opportunity to review the trends in housing Boston’s students and the effect these students are having on Boston’s local housing market. This report is based on data from the University Accountability Reports (UAR) submitted by Boston-based institutions of higher education.3 In this edition of Student Housing Trends,4 data improvements have led to more precise enrollment and off-campus data, allowing the City to better distinguish between students that are or are not having an impact on the private housing market. The key findings are: ● • Overall enrollment at Boston-based colleges and universities is 147,689. This represents net growth of just under 4,000 (2.8%) students since 2013, and a 2,300+ (1.6%) student increase over last year. -
Inside: • up and Coming Lawyers • Diversity Heroes •“The Lawscars” • Excellence in Legal Journalism Award
Inside: • Up and Coming Lawyers • Diversity Heroes •“The Lawscars” • Excellence in Legal Journalism Award Excellence in the law celebration May 20, 2010 5:30-8 p.m. Boston Marriott Copley Place For questions regarding the event, contact Melissa Mitchell at 617-218-8213 or [email protected] Presented by: Sponsored by: Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly www.masslawyersweekly.com April 19, 2010 B3 In this special section, Lawyers Weekly highlights 20 “rising stars” — Massachusetts lawyers who have been members of the bar for 10 years or less, but who have already distinguished themselves in some manner and appear poised for even greater accomplishments. WILLIAM J. BARABINO By Eric T. Berkman Since then, Barabino’s solo practice has grown as he’s obtained dozens of acquittals Wakefield criminal defense lawyer and dismissals in everything from drunk- William J. Barabino started his career driving and probation-violation cases to with two high-profile cases and hasn’t rape and murder. But he’s especially proud slowed down since. of representing youthful offenders. On his very first day of practice, he walked “It’s such a big responsibility, because juve- into Salem District Court only to be greeted niles are only charged as adults for the most by a pool of cameras serious crimes,” Barabi- and a reporter from no says. “I’m represent- The Boston Globe. It “I’m representing ing the people who turned out they were need it the most.” covering the bail hear- the people who The case that ing of a man accused of stands out most for indecent assault and need it the most.” him involved a 15- battery. -
Applicants to Accredited Law Schools
Applicants to Accredited Law Schools, 2012-2013 WFU National Seniors All Seniors All Number of Applicants 47 107 19,576 59,384 Average LSAT Score 156.4 157.9 153.8 153.1 Percentile 67th 71st 56th 56th Undergraduate GPA 3.34 3.22 3.37 3.26 Admitted to ABA Law School(s) Number 42 94 16,769 45,700 Percent 89% 88% 86% 77% Enrolled at a Law School Number 36 83 14,672 37,936 Percent 77% 78% 75% 64% Admissions per Applicant 3.85 3.58 3.48 2.82 Law Schools Admitting Wake Forest Applicants, 2012-2013 An asterisk (*) indicates that a student from Wake Forest enrolled at the school. Albany Law School of Union University* Michigan State University College of Law University of Chicago Law School American University Washington College of Law* Mississippi College of Law University of Cincinnati College of Law Appalachian School of Law New England Law – Boston University of Connecticut School of Law* Atlanta’s John Marshall Law School* New York Law School University of Denver School of Law Baylor University School of Law New York University School of Law University of the District of Columbia Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law* North Carolina Central University* University of Florida* Boston College Law School Northeastern University School of Law University of Georgia School of Law Boston University School of Law* Northern Kentucky University University of Houston Law Center Brooklyn Law School* Northwestern University School of Law University of Idaho School of Law* Campbell University* Notre Dame Law School University of Illinois College of Law Charleston -
How Many Connecticut College Alumni Earn Graduate Or Professional Degrees?
How Many Connecticut College Alumni Earn Graduate or Professional Degrees? John D. Nugent Office of Institutional Research and Planning March 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We used National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) data to determine how many Connecticut College alumni earn graduate or professional degrees within about 10 years of graduating. NSC data showed 637 (47%) of the 1,367 graduates of the Classes of 2007, 2008, and 2009 earned a total of 711 graduate or professional degrees as of January 2019. In descending order of frequency, 67% of these were master’s degrees (n=477) 12% were law degrees (n=85), 9% were business degrees (n=62), 6% were doctorates (n=46), and another 6% were medical degrees (n=41). Because several dozen 2007‐2009 graduates were still enrolled in degree programs as of the Spring 2019 semester, and because NSC data include only U.S. colleges and universities, it is safe to conclude that about half of these alumni will ultimately have earned one or more post‐baccalaureate degrees. Most 2007‐2009 graduates who went on to receive a medical, law or business degree waited at least two years after their graduation from Conn before enrolling in the program. The average elapsed time before beginning a degree program in medicine, law, or business was 26 months, 27 months, and 48 months, respectively. Using the federal government’s Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP) categories, the ten most common academic fields in which these alumni earned graduate or professional degrees were Health Professions and Related Programs (n=110 degrees); Education (n=104); Legal Professions and Studies (n=86); Business Management, Marketing, and Related Support Services (n=81); Public Administration and Social Service Professions (n=63); Psychology (n=52); Social Sciences (n=37); Visual and Performing Arts (n=26); Biological and Biomedical Sciences (n=20); Architecture and Related Services (n=15); and Physical Sciences (n=15). -
RAPPAPORT POLICY BRIEFS Instituterappaport for Greater Boston INSTITUTE Kennedy Schoolfor of Government, Greater Harvard University Boston June 2008
RAPPAPORT POLICY BRIEFS InstituteRAPPAPORT for Greater Boston INSTITUTE Kennedy Schoolfor of Government, Greater Harvard University Boston June 2008 Reducing Youth Violence: Lessons from the Boston Youth Survey By Renee M. Johnson, Deborah Azrael, Mary Vriniotis, and David Hemenway, Harvard School of Public Health In Boston, as in many other cities, aggressive behavior, assault, weapon Rappaport Institute Policy Briefs are short youth violence takes an unacceptably carrying, feelings of safety, and overviews of new scholarly research on important issues facing the region. This high toll. Reducing the burden of gang membership. It also inquired brief reports on the results of the Boston youth violence is a priority for the about risk and protective factors for Youth Survey 2006 (BYS), an in-school survey of Boston high school youth conducted City’s policymakers, civic leaders, violence (e.g., alcohol and drug use, biennially by the Harvard Youth Violence Prevention Center in collaboration with the and residents. To date, however, depressive symptoms, family violence, City of Boston. More information is available little information has been available developmental assets, academic at www.hsph.harvard.edu/hyvpc/research/. about the prevalence, antecedents and performance, perceptions of collective Renee M. Johnson impacts of youth violence in Boston. effi cacy within one’s neighborhood), Renee M. Johnson is a Research Associate at the Harvard School of Public Health and The Boston Youth Survey (BYS) and health behaviors (e.g., nutrition Core Faculty at the Harvard Youth Violence and physical activity). Although 1,233 Prevention Center. addresses this gap in knowledge. It is Deborah Azrael students took the survey, the analytical an in-school survey of Boston high Deborah Azrael is a Research Associate at the school students conducted by the sample includes only the 1,215 who Harvard School of Public Health. -
Boston Bound: a Comparison of Boston’S Legal Powers with Those of Six Other Major American Cities by Gerald E
RAPPAPORT POLICY BRIEFS Institute for Greater Boston Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University December 2007 Boston Bound: A Comparison of Boston’s Legal Powers with Those of Six Other Major American Cities By Gerald E. Frug and David J. Barron, Harvard Law School Boston is an urban success story. It cities — Atlanta, Chicago, Denver, Rappaport Institute Policy Briefs are short has emerged from the fi nancial crises New York City, San Francisco, and overviews of new and notable scholarly research on important issues facing the of the 1950s and 1960s to become Seattle — enjoy to shape its own region. The Institute also distributes a diverse, vital, and economically future. It is hard to understand why Rappaport Institute Policy Notes, a periodic summary of new policy-related powerful city. Anchored by an the Commonwealth should want its scholarly research about Greater Boston. outstanding array of colleges and major city—the economic driver This policy brief is based on “Boston universities, world-class health of its most populous metropolitan Bound: A Comparison of Boston’s Legal Powers with Those of Six Other care providers, leading fi nancial area—to be constrained in a way Major American Cities,” a report by Frug and Barron published by The Boston institutions, and numerous other that comparable cities in other states Foundation. The report is available assets, today’s Boston drives the are not. Like Boston, the six cities online at http://www.tbf.org/tbfgen1. asp?id=3448. metropolitan economy and is one of are large, economically infl uential the most exciting and dynamic cities actors within their states and regions, Gerald E. -
STATEMENT of LAWYERS and LEGAL SCHOLARS AGAINST U.S. SANCTIONS on ICC INVESTIGATORS of ATROCITIES June 2020 As Lawyers and Lega
STATEMENT OF LAWYERS AND LEGAL SCHOLARS AGAINST U.S. SANCTIONS ON ICC INVESTIGATORS OF ATROCITIES June 2020 As lawyers and legal scholars with experience in the fields of international law and national security, we urge the President to rescind his June 11 Executive Order targeting investigators and prosecutors of the International Criminal Court (ICC). The Order authorizes asset freezes and visa denials against ICC lawyers and officials who investigate U.S. personnel, including military and CIA personnel for alleged torture, rape, and other war crimes in Afghanistan, and relatedly at CIA “black sites” in Lithuania, Poland and Romania. All of these States are Parties to the ICC, an international court to which 123 countries – including our democratic allies in Europe and nations such as Australia, Canada, Costa Rica, Japan, South Africa and South Korea – are parties. The ICC is authorized by its statute to prosecute genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, committed on the territories of its State Parties. The undersigned have a diversity of views on the ICC and its Afghanistan investigation. However, we share the conviction that sanctioning ICC lawyers for carrying out their responsibilities to investigate atrocities is wrong in principle, contrary to American values, and prejudicial to U.S. national security. U.S. sanctions have long been legitimately imposed on terrorists, international criminals, and gross violators of human rights. But targeting ICC lawyers – and in some cases their families – punishes the very people who investigate atrocities. Seeking to intimidate investigators and punish prosecutors perverts the purpose and undermines the legitimacy of sanctions. The Afghanistan investigation is not a case of runaway prosecutors. -
(617) 548-8834 EDUCATION HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, Camb
R. MICHAEL CASSIDY P.O. Box 422 Winchester, MA 01890 [email protected] (617) 548-8834 EDUCATION HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, Cambridge, Massachusetts Juris Doctor, magna cum laude, 1985. UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME, South Bend, Indiana Bachelor of Arts, magna cum laude, 1982. Major: Government. Phi Beta Kappa. EXPERIENCE (PRESENT) BOSTON COLLEGE LAW SCHOOL Professor of Law (tenured since 2005) Courses: Evidence Criminal Law White Collar Crime Prosecutorial Ethics Advanced Evidence: Trial Objections Professional and Moral Responsibility of Lawyers Awards: Slizewski Distinguished Teaching Award (2005, 2010, 2016, 2019 and 2020) Student Yearbook Dedication (2003 and 2006) Faculty Pro Bono Service Award (2006) University Public Service Award (2002) Faculty Director Rappaport Center for Law & Public Policy (2015-2018) Supported research and hosted lectures, debates and roundtable discussions on important public policy issues affecting Greater Boston and Massachusetts. Center also provides fellowships and mentoring support for law students interested in pursuing careers in government service. Associate Dean for Academic Affairs (2007-2010) Responsible for all aspects of the academic program, including developing curriculum; making teaching assignments; recruiting, training and mentoring new full-time faculty; hiring adjunct faculty; planning faculty colloquia and symposia; complying with ABA accreditation standards; promoting faculty scholarship; implementing academic policies; hearing allegations of student academic misconduct; and, providing direction to staff in Registrar’s office. Advised Dean on strategic initiatives. Associate Dean for Administration and Finance (1996-2002) Responsible for administrative operations of the law school, including Admissions, Financial Aid, Career Services, Public Relations & Print Marketing, Law Reviews, and Faculty Support. Chief law School personnel officer and fiscal officer, responsible for managing an annual operating budget of 1 approximately $20 million.